Evaluation of Alere i Influenza A&B for Rapid Detection of Influenza Viruses A and B

Rapid and accurate diagnosis of influenza is important for infection control, as well as for patient management. Alere i Influenza A&B is an isothermal nucleic acid amplification-based integrated system for detection and differentiation of influenza virus A and influenza virus B. The performance of the Alere i Influenza A&B was screened using frozen nasopharyngeal-swab specimens collected in viral transport medium (VTM) that were originally tested fresh with the FilmArray Respiratory Panel (RP) assay during the 2012–2013 influenza outbreak. In total, 360 VTM specimens were selected for Alere i Influenza A&B testing: 40 influenza virus A H1N1-2009 (influenza virus A-1), 40 influenza virus A H3N2 (influenza virus A-3), 37 influenza virus A “equivocal” or “no subtype detected” (influenza virus A-u), 41 influenza virus B, and 202 influenza virus-negative specimens, as initially determined by the FilmArray RP assay. The Alere assay showed sensitivities of 87.2%, 92.5%, 25.0%, and 97.4% for influenza virus A-1, influenza virus A-3, influenza virus A-u, and influenza virus B, respectively, after discordant resolution by Prodesse ProFLU+ PCR. The specificities were 100% for both influenza virus A and influenza virus B. In general, the Alere i Influenza A&B provided good sensitivity, although the assay did show poorer sensitivity with samples determined to have low influenza virus A titers by Prodesse ProFlu+ PCR (a mean real-time PCR threshold cycle [C_T] value of 31.9 ± 2.0), which included the majority of the samples called influenza virus A “equivocal” or “no subtype detected” by a single BioFire FilmArray RP test. The integrated, rapid, and simple characteristics of the Alere i Influenza A&B assay make it a potential candidate for point-of-care testing, with a test turnaround time of less than 15 min.     

Evaluation of a Rapid Detection Influenza Virus A Antigens Kit Using Paired Serum Antibody Test

Purpose

To evaluate the feasibility for gold immunochromatographic assay (GICA) in rapid detection of influenza virus A infection.

Materials and Methods

Seventy-three patients were enrolled. All patients contributed nasopharyngeal secretions and paired serum samples. Nasopharyngeal secretions was used for colloidal gold immunochromatographic rapid assay for influenza A virus immediately after the collection of specimen. Paired serum samples were used for the hemagglutination inhibition assay at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention influenza network laboratory in Beijing.

Results

Compare GICA test to hemagglutination inhibition (HI) assay, the Kappa value was 0.402 and the p value in the paired χ² test was higher than 0.05. Therefore, the difference was not statistically significant. The sensitivity of GICA was 50.0% and the specificity was 90.2%, and the negative predictive value was 90.2%.

Conclusion

The sensitivity for Influenza A antigen detection by using GICA is relatively low, the specificity is relatively satisfactory.     

QuickVue Influenza Test for Rapid Detection of Influenza A and B Viruses in a Pediatric Population

The performance of a lateral-flow immunoassay, the QuickVue Influenza Test, for detection of influenza A and B viruses in comparison with that of cell culture was evaluated by using nasopharyngeal aspirates, in viral transport medium, from children with respiratory tract infections. The sensitivity and specificity were 79.2 and 82.6%, respectively.     

化学发光免疫分析法检测乙肝病毒感染性标志物的临床应用

目的 探讨化学发光免疫分析法检测乙肝病毒感染性标志物的临床应用效果.方法 抽取我院2013年1月至2014年1月接收的疑似乙型肝炎病人800例,采用化学发光免疫分析法(CLIA)和酶联免疫吸附试验法(ELISA)分别检测患者的乙肝病毒血清标志物.结果 HBsAg、HBeAg、HBeAb的检出率CLIA高于ELISA(P＜0.01),两种方法HBsAb、HBcAb的检出率无明显差异(P＞0.05);低水平HBsAg检测ELISA敏感性低于CLIA;ELISA检出的最低浓度为0.128IU/mL,CLIA法检出的最低浓度为0.0311U/mL.结论 采用CLIA检测乙肝病毒感染性标志物相比ELISA更准确,可有效应用于乙肝临床诊断和病情动态监测.     

Application of Subtype-Specific Monoclonal Antibodies for Rapid Detection and Identification of Influenza A and B Viruses

We established a rapid method for the identification of influenza A and B virus strains: the peroxidase-antiperoxidase (PAP) staining method with two subtype-specific murine monoclonal antibodies, C179 (H1 and H2 specific) and F49 (H3 specific), and an anti-influenza B virus rabbit polyclonal serum. The types and subtypes of 160 strains were examined, and 158 strains were identified to be the same by the hemagglutination-inhibition (HI) test and the PAP method. In contrast to the results by the HI test, two strains were revealed to be a mixture of two subtypes (H1 and H3) by the PAP method, which was confirmed by plaque cloning. We further analyzed clinical specimens by the PAP method by directly inoculating specimens into Madin-Darby canine kidney cells in microplates. After 40 h of incubation, the types and subtypes of viruses in 52 of 152 specimens were clearly identified. Since the reactivities of the two monoclonal antibodies are not influenced by the antigenic drift of influenza virus, the newly developed method should be applicable not only for rapid diagnosis but also for the epidemiological study of influenza.     

不同试剂盒对乙脑病毒RNA提取效能的比较

目的比较常见的3种商售RNA提取试剂对乙脑病毒检测的相对效率、耗时和成本,为实验室应用及检测结果的评价提供依据。方法对乙脑病毒参考株悬液作10^-1～10^-4系列稀释,选用QIAGEN公司的QIAamp Viral RNA Mini Kit、Sangon生物公司的RNA提取试剂盒和Invitrogen公司的Trizol试剂3种核酸提取方法提取上述样本RNA．用TaqMan实时荧光定量反转录聚合酶链反应对其提取效率进行评价,并比较3种试剂（盒）的耗费时间和价格。结果对不同稀释度乙脑病毒样本的检测,均以QIAGEN公司QIAamp Viral RNA Mini Kit检测的敏感度最高。以该试剂盒的提取效率为100％,则Invitrogen和Sangon生物公司RNA提取试剂（盒）的提取效率分别为77．4％～86．8％和64．2％～74．1％。3种试剂（盒）对cDNA起始模板量的估计也有明显的影响,差别达到1～3个数量级,以QIAGEN公司的试剂盒最敏感。3种试剂（盒）提取RNA耗时分别为60min、100min和70min,价格效率比分别为46元、23元和20元。结论RNA提取试剂可影响JEV荧光定量PCR检测的结果,各实验室应根据实验目的和实验室条件．合理选择病毒RNA提取试剂盒。     

国产肿瘤标志物免疫分析药盒质量考察

用美国Ｂｉｏ－ｒａｄ公司、瑞典ＣＡＮＡＧ公司出品的质控样品和国家质量控制血清作为标准物质对１３个国产肿瘤标志物ＩＲＭＡ与ＲＩＡ药盒进行了质量检验。９个ＩＲＭＡ药盒的Ｂｍａｘ／Ｂｍｉｎ比值均大于２０，平均批变异系数（ＡＢＣＶ）小于４％，ｒ〉０．９９００；４个ＲＩＡ药盒的ＮＳＢ／Ｔ％〈５，Ｂ０／Ｔ〉３０，│ｒ│〉０．９９００，ＥＤ（有效剂量值）２５、ＥＤ和ＥＤ７５均在剂量－反应曲线范围内。每种药盒的质     

Evaluation of the Rapid BioStar Optical Immunoassay for Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in Adolescent Women

We evaluated the performance of the BioStar Chlamydia OIA (optical immunoassay) in adolescent females (n = 261) from an inner city population. With a reference standard of two different nucleic acid amplification tests, the sensitivity and specificity of the BioStar Chlamydia OIA were 59.4 and 98.4%, respectively. Due to its relatively low sensitivity, the BioStar Chlamydia OIA should only be used in conjunction with more sensitive laboratory tests unless laboratory tests are unavailable or timely return for treatment is unlikely.     

Evaluation of the Cepheid Respiratory Syncytial Virus and Influenza Virus A/B real-time PCR analyte specific reagent

Two rapid real-time RT-PCR assays, specific for respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and influenza A and B, were evaluated for the detection of these viruses in clinical respiratory samples. The RSV assay was applied to 100 samples and the Influenza A and B assay applied to 96 samples all of which had been tested previously by an “in-house” multiplex real-time PCR assay. Forty-three samples were negative for RSV by both methods and 56 samples were positive by both methods. One sample was negative by the new RSV assay although it was positive for RSV A by the “in-house” test. Thirty-nine samples were negative for influenza virus by both methods and 55 samples were positive by both assays. Two samples were negative by the new influenza assay however they were positive by the “in-house” influenza assay. The new assays did not cross react with samples containing other viruses including parainfluenza 1, 2, and 4; human metapnuemovirus; coronavirus 229E, NL63, OC43; rhinovirus; adenovirus; bocavirus and had a specificity of 100% and a sensitivity of 98.2% for RSV and 96.5% for influenza respectively. The results of this study demonstrate that the new assays are specific and sensitive for the detection of RSV and influenza viruses in clinical samples.     

Evaluation of Simplexa Flu A/B & RSV for Direct Detection of Influenza Viruses (A and B) and Respiratory Syncytial Virus in Patient Clinical Samples

We evaluated the performance of the Simplexa Flu A/B & RSV kit on 170 prospective respiratory samples using a modified protocol, supplied by the manufacturer, that eliminates the RNA extraction step. Overall, compared against our laboratory-developed assay, the assay''s sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were 95.1%, 99.6%, 98.7%, and 98.6%, respectively.     

A Novel Antigen Detection Immunoassay for Field Diagnosis of Hepatitis C Virus Infection

Abstract

The limitations of dominant methods-based on the detection of anti-HCV antibodies or HCV viremia currently used for the diagnosis of HCV infection enhance efforts to have a rapid, simple, sensitive, and specific alternative diagnostic approach to detect viral antigens. A highly reactive IgG antibody was raised to HCV-NS4 recombinant antigen. The produced antibody showed no cross-reactivity with the other HCV structural and nonstructural recombinant antigens (C1 + 2, C3 + 4, E2/NS1, NS3, NS5). The well established ELISA technique was adapted to detect the new target HCV-NS4 antigen in serum samples. Extremely high agreement was found between the results of ELISA and qualitative detection of HCV-RNA, using a RT-PCR test as a gold standard for the diagnosis of HCV infection. Based on these encouraging results, a novel enzyme immunoassay; dot-ELISA was developed for rapid (?5 min) and simple qualitative detection of the target HCV antigen in serum. The developed method detected the HCV target antigen in 95% of serum samples from HCV infected individuals, with a specificity of 97% using sera of noninfected individuals in comparison with PCR test. The antigen detection method showed high predictive values of positive (99%) and negative (90%). Moreover, the dot-ELISA could detect the HCV target antigen in sera negative for anti-HCV Abs, but positive for HCV-RNA, and in sera of HCV infected individuals with low viremia, as well as those with high viremia, using quantitative RT-PCR. Accordingly, the developed highly sensitive and specific HCV antigen detection method could be applied for mass screening of HCV infection.     

Evaluation of Oral Fluid Enzyme Immunoassay for Confirmation of a Positive Rapid Human Immunodeficiency Virus Test Result

The CDC recommends that a reactive rapid human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) test be confirmed with an approved supplemental test; the performance of an intermediate enzyme immunoassay (EIA) is optional. In support of this recommendation, it was found that of 1,431 reactive rapid HIV test results, 2 (0.1%) had false-negative oral fluid Western blot results and both had false-negative EIA results.Until 2002 in the United States, all tests for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection were conducted in laboratories and the results were reported within several days to 2 weeks. Beginning in 2003, rapid HIV tests waived under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 became available. The rapid tests can be performed with finger-stick whole-blood or oral fluid specimens in nonclinical settings, and the results (negative or preliminary positive) are available within an hour. Negative rapid test results may be reported without further testing. However, preliminary positive rapid test results must be confirmed in a laboratory with a supplemental test (e.g., a Western blot [WB] test) (2, 3). WB results from serum specimens are more accurate than WB results from oral fluid specimens, but because phlebotomy is not always feasible in nonclinical settings, some HIV testing programs use oral fluid for WB confirmation of rapid tests (4) (OraSure HIV type 1 [HIV-1] WB kit package insert; OraSure, Inc., Bethlehem, PA). Before 2007, the CDC recommended that a laboratory-based enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and a WB test be performed when oral fluid specimens were submitted for confirmation of positive rapid tests. In 2007, the CDC changed this recommendation because of the impending withdrawal of the only Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved oral fluid EIA and because postmarketing surveillance data identified several instances in which the oral fluid EIA was negative in persons whose rapid tests and oral fluid or serum WB were positive (1, 2). To evaluate the additional diagnostic usefulness of an oral fluid EIA to confirm preliminary positive rapid test results, the CDC examined the EIA and WB results for oral fluid specimens from persons confirmed to be HIV infected by serum WB.Study participants were persons with known HIV infection who had not taken antiretroviral treatment during the past 3 months. During the period from March 2006 to August 2007, 1,436 participants, all confirmed to be HIV infected by serum WB, were enrolled at clinics in six cities (Atlanta, GA; Baltimore, MD; Chicago, IL; Denver, CO; Louisville, KY; and Philadelphia, PA). Participants provided finger-stick whole-blood and oral fluid specimens, which were tested by the OraQuick Advance Rapid HIV-1/2 antibody test (OraSure, Inc., Bethlehem, PA) at the study site. Additional oral fluid specimens were collected using an OraSure HIV-1 oral specimen collection device and tested with the Vironostika HIV-1 Microelisa system EIA (bioMérieux, Marcy-l''Etoile, France) and the OraSure HIV-1 WB. The oral fluid EIA was not conducted for 429 specimens because of the unavailability of test kits due to a manufacturer shortage. Serum specimens were collected using standard BD Vacutainer tubes (Becton, Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, NJ) and tested with the Genetic Systems HIV-1/HIV-2 Plus O EIA and HIV-1 WB (Bio-Rad, Redmond, WA).Specimens from 5 of the 1,436 participants were excluded from analysis: two specimens were suspected of having an error in identification labeling, and three oral fluid specimens had insufficient volume for confirmatory testing. All whole-blood (n = 1,431) and oral fluid (n = 1,429) specimens tested positive using the OraQuick rapid test. All serum specimens (n = 1,431) tested positive by serum WB. Of the 1,431 oral fluid specimens tested by oral fluid WB, 1,423 (99.4%) were positive, six (0.4%) were indeterminate, and two (0.1%) were negative. Oral fluid EIAs were performed on 994 of the 1,423 specimens that had positive oral fluid WB results, and all 994 oral fluid EIAs were reactive. Of the six oral fluid specimens with indeterminate WB results, five of six (83.3%) were positive by oral fluid EIA. Of the two oral fluid WB-negative specimens, neither was positive by oral fluid EIA.Data from this study indicate that oral fluid WB tests were positive in 99.4% of specimens from persons who were known to be HIV infected. However, specimens from approximately 0.1% of HIV-infected persons had false-negative oral fluid WB results, and both of these specimens also had false-negative oral fluid EIA results. Specimens from six (0.4%) HIV-infected persons had indeterminate oral fluid WB results, and one of these specimens had false-negative results for oral fluid EIA. Current guidelines require additional confirmatory testing using a blood specimen for any persons with a positive rapid test and a negative or indeterminate oral fluid WB (3). For these persons, even if there is a positive oral fluid EIA result, they will still need a follow-up WB.Postmarketing surveillance conducted in 2003 to monitor the performance of the OraQuick test indicated that some HIV-infected persons with preliminary positive rapid test results had false-negative oral fluid EIA results (2). In addition, the only FDA-approved oral fluid EIA was withdrawn from the market (1). The results of this study support current CDC recommendations that all preliminary positive rapid test results be confirmed with an additional approved supplemental test for HIV, such as WB or an immunofluorescence assay, and that performing an intermediate EIA is optional (2, 3). The CDC further recommends that if WB confirmatory testing of an oral fluid specimen produces a negative or an indeterminate result, confirmatory testing should be repeated with a blood specimen because of its greater sensitivity (2, 3).     

流感及H5N1亚型禽流感病毒液相检测芯片的制备

目的 建立利用液相芯片技术检测甲、乙型流感和H5N1亚型高致病性禽流感病毒的方法,并对该方法进行评价。方法 对GenBank中甲型流感病毒的NP、乙型流感病毒的HA以及高致病性禽流感病毒（H5N1）的H5、N1基因片段序列进行同源性比对,根据保守序列,设计针对各基因的简并引物和寡核苷酸探针,制备探针偶联微球,将样本核酸多重PCR扩增产物与微球进行杂交,以Bio-Plex液相芯片检测系统进行芯片检测。结果 该方法可以对甲型流感病毒的NP基因、乙型流感病毒的HA基因以及高致病性禽流感病毒（H5N1）的H5、N1基因同时进行检测,病毒核酸的最低检出量为1pg,检测特异性高。结论 成功构建了甲、乙型流感病毒和H5N1亚型高致病性禽流感病毒液相芯片检测系统,为流感、禽流感的快速检测、诊断奠定了基础。