Prevalence of Sagittal Spinal Deformity Among Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty

BackgroundThe important relationship between sagittal spinal alignment and total hip arthroplasty (THA) is becoming well recognized. Prior research has shown a significant relationship between sagittal spinal deformity (SSD) and THA instability. This study aims at determining the prevalence of SSD among preoperative THA patients.MethodsA multicenter database of preoperative THA patients was analyzed. Radiographic parameters measured from standing radiographs included anterior pelvic plane tilt, spinopelvic tilt, and lumbar lordosis (LL); pelvic incidence (PI) was measured from computed tomography scans. Lumbar flatback was defined as PI-LL mismatch >10°, balanced as PI-LL of −10° to 10°, and hyperlordosis as PI-LL <−10°.ResultsA total of 1088 patients were analyzed (mean, 64 years; 48% female). And 59% (n = 644) of patients had balanced alignment, 16% (n = 174) had a PI-LL > 10°, and 4% (n = 46) had a PI-LL > 20° (severe flatback deformity). The prevalence of hyperlordosis was 25% (n = 270). Flatback patients tended to be older than balanced and hyperlordotic patients (69.5 vs 64.0 vs 60.8 years, P < .001). Spinopelvic tilt was more posterior in flatback compared to balanced and hyperlordotic patients (24.7° vs 15.4° vs 7.0°) as was anterior pelvic plane tilt (−7.1° vs −2.0° vs 2.5°) and PI (64.1° vs 56.8° vs 49.0°), all P < .001.ConclusionOnly 59% of patients undergoing THA have normally aligned lumbar spines. Flatback SSD was observed in 16% (4% with severe flatback deformity) and there was a 25% prevalence of hyperlordosis. Lumbar flatback was associated with increasing age, posterior pelvic tilt, and larger PI. The relatively high prevalence of spinal deformity in this population reinforces the importance of considering spinopelvic alignment in THA planning and risk stratification.     

Does It Matter: Total Hip Arthroplasty or Lumbar Spinal Fusion First? Preoperative Sagittal Spinopelvic Measurements Guide Patient-Specific Surgical Strategies in Patients Requiring Both

BackgroundIn patients requiring both total hip arthroplasty (THA) and lumbar spinal fusion (LSF), consideration of preoperative sagittal spinopelvic measurements can aid in the prediction of postfusion compensatory changes in pelvic tilt (PT) and inform adjustments to traditional THA cup anteversion. This study aims to identify relationships between spinopelvic measurements and post-THA hip instability and to determine if procedure order reveals a difference in hip dislocation rate.MethodsPatients at a single practice site who received both THA and LSF between 2005 and 2015 (292: 158 = LSF prior to THA, 134 = THA prior to LSF) were retrospectively reviewed for incidents of THA instability. Those with complete radiograph series (89) had their sagittal (standing) spinopelvic profiles measured preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, and 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 1.5 years, and 2 years postoperatively. Measured parameters included lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), PT, and sacral slope (SS).ResultsNo significant differences in dislocation rates between operative order groups were elicited (7/73 LSF first, 4/62 THA first; Z = 0.664, P = .509). Compared to nondislocators, dislocators had lower LL (−10.9) and SS (−7.8), and higher PT (+4.3) and PI-LL (+7.3). Additional risk factors for dislocation included sacral fusion (relative risk [RR] = 3.0) and revision fusion (RR = 2.7) . Predictive power of the model generated through multiple regression to characterize individual profiles of post-LSF PT compensation based on perioperative measurements was most significant at 1 year (R² = 0.565, F = 0.000456, P = .028) and 2 years (R² = 0.741, F = 0.031, P = .001) postoperatively.ConclusionIn performing THA after LSF, it is theoretically ideal to proceed with THA at a postfusion interval of at least 1 year, beyond which further compensatory PT change is minimal. However, the order of surgical procedure revealed no statistical difference in hip instability rates. In cases characterized by large PI-LL mismatch (larger or less predictable compensation profiles) or large SS or LL loss (considerably atypical muscle recruitment), consideration of full functional anteversion range between sitting and standing positions to account for abnormalities not appreciated with standing radiographic assessment alone may be warranted.     

Effects of Sagittal Spinal Alignment on Postural Pelvic Mobility in Total Hip Arthroplasty Candidates

BackgroundRecent research has demonstrated that patients with reduced pelvic mobility from standing to sitting have higher rates of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study evaluates the effect of sagittal spinal deformity, defined by pelvic incidence–lumbar lordosis mismatch (PI-LL), on postural changes in pelvic tilt (PT).MethodsA multicenter database of 1100 preoperative THA patients was queried. Anterior-pelvic-plane tilt (APPt), spinopelvic tilt (SPT), and LL were measured from radiographs of patients in supine, standing, flexed-seated, and stepping-up postures; PI was measured from computed tomography. Patients were separated into 3 groups based on PI-LL (<?10°, ?10° to 10°, >10°) and propensity-score matched by PI. Lumbar flatback-deformity was defined as PI-LL > 10°, hyperlordosis: PI-LL < ?10°. SPT/APPt, including changes between each posture were compared across PI-LL groups using analysis of variance, with post-hoc Tukey tests. Pearson correlations were reported when testing associations between SPT/APPt change and PI-LL.ResultsAfter propensity-score matching, 288 patients were analyzed (mean 65 y; 49% F). SPT and APPt change differed across all PI-LL categories from standing to seated, supine, and stepping-up with less SPT/APPt recruitment among hyperlordotic vs flatback patients (all P < .001). Greater PI-LL correlated with greater SPT recruitment from standing to seated (R = 0.294), supine (R = 0.292), and stepping-up (R = 0.207) (all P < .001). Smaller LL changes from standing to seated were associated with greater SPT recruitment (R = 0.372, P < .001).ConclusionsPostural changes in SPT/APPt are associated with spinopelvic measures in THA candidates. Hyperlordotic patients tend to utilize their spines more compared with flatback patients who were more likely to recruit PT. Increased focus on patients with lumbar flatback and hyperlordosis may help in reducing prosthetic dislocation prevalence following THA.     

Risk of Dislocation and Revision Following Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients With Prior Lumbar Fusion With Spinopelvic Fixation

BackgroundThe effect of spinopelvic fixation in addition to lumbar spinal fusion (LSF) on dislocation/instability and revision in patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) has not been reported previously.MethodsThe PearlDiver Research Program was used to identify patients aged 30 and above undergoing primary THA who received (1) THA only, (2) THA with prior single-level LSF, (3) THA with prior 2-5 level LSF, or (4) THA with prior LSF with spinopelvic fixation. The incidence of THA revision and dislocation/instability was compared through logistic regression and Chi-squared analysis. All regressions were controlled for age, gender, and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI).ResultsBetween 2010 and 2018, 465,558 patients without history of LSF undergoing THA were examined and compared to 180 THA patients with prior spinopelvic fixation, 5,299 with prior single-level LSF, and 1,465 with prior 2-5 level LSF. At 2 years, 7.8% of THA patients with prior spinopelvic fixation, 4.7% of THA patients with prior 2-5 level LSF, 4.2% of THA patients with prior single-level LSF, and 2.2% of THA patients undergoing only THA had a dislocation event or instability (P < .0001). After controlling for length of fusion, pelvic fixation itself was associated with higher independent risk of revision (at 2 years: 2-5 level LSF + spinopelvic fixation: aHR = 3.15, 95% CI 1.77-5.61, P < .0001 vs 2-5 level LSF with no spinopelvic fixation: aOR = 1.39, 95% CI 1.10-1.76, P < .0001).ConclusionAt 2 years, spinopelvic fixation in THA patients were associated with a greater than 3.5-fold increase in hip dislocation risk compared to those without LSF, and an over 2-fold increase in THA revision risk compared to those with LSF without spinopelvic fixation.Level of EvidenceIII.     

Mortality and Complications Following Early Conversion Arthroplasty for Failed Hip Fracture Surgery

BackgroundHip fracture in older patients leads to high morbidity and mortality. Patients who are treated surgically but fail acutely face a more complex operation with conversion total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study investigated mortalities and complications in patients who experienced failure within one year following hip fracture surgery requiring conversion THA.MethodsPatients aged 60 years or more undergoing conversion THA within one year following intertrochanteric or femoral neck fracture were identified and propensity-matched to patients sustaining hip fractures treated surgically but not requiring conversion within the first year. Patients who had two-year follow-up (91 conversions; 247 comparisons) were analyzed for 6-month, 12-month, and 24-month mortalities, 90-day readmissions, surgical complications, and medical complications.ResultsNonunion and screw cutout were the most common indications for conversion THA. Mortalities were similar between groups at 6 months (7.7% conversion versus 6.1% nonconversion, P = .774), 12 months (11% conversion versus 12% nonconversion, P = .999), and 24 months (14% conversion versus 22% nonconversion, P = .163). Survivorships were similar between groups for the entire cohort and by fracture type. Conversion THA had a higher rate of 90-day readmissions (14% versus 3.2%, P = .001), and medical complications (17% versus 6.1%, P = .006). Inpatient and 90-day orthopaedic complications were similar.ConclusionConversion THA for failed hip fracture surgery had comparable mortality rates to hip fracture surgery, with higher rates of perioperative medical complications and readmissions. Conversion THA following hip fracture represents a potential “second hit” that both surgeons and patients should be aware of with initial decision-making.     

What are the Outcomes After Primary Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in Patients With Prior Cerebrovascular Accidents?

BackgroundFor patients who have a history of cerebrovascular accident (CVA) with neurological sequelae undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA), we sought to determine mortality rate, implant survivorship, complications, and clinical outcomes.MethodsOur total joint registry identified CVA sequelae patients undergoing primary THA (n = 42 with 25 on affected hip) and TKA (n = 56 with 34 on affected knee). Patients were 1:2 matched based upon age, sex, body mass index, and surgical year to a non-CVA cohort. Mortality and implant survivorship were evaluated via Kaplan-Meier methods. Clinical outcomes were assessed via Harris Hip scores or Knee Society scores . Mean follow-up was 5 years (range, 2-12).ResultsFor CVA sequelae and non-CVA patients, respectively, the 5-year patient survivorship was 69 versus 89% after THA (HR = 2.5; P = .006) and 56 versus 90% after TKA (HR = 2.4, P = .003). No significant difference was noted between groups in implant survivorship free from any reoperation after THA (P > .2) and TKA (P > .6). Postoperative CVA occurred at an equal rate in CVA sequelae and non-CVA patients after TKA (1.8%); none after THA in either group. The magnitude of change in Harris Hip scores (P = .7) and Knee Society scores (P = .7) were similar for CVA sequelae and non-CVA patients.ConclusionComplications, including the risk of postoperative CVA, implant survivorship, and outcome score improvement are similar for CVA sequelae and non-CVA patients. A 2.5-fold increased risk of death at a mean of 5 years after primary THA or TKA exist for CVA sequelae patients.     

Differences in Spinopelvic Characteristics Between Hip Osteoarthritis Patients and Controls

BackgroundThis study of patients with hip primary osteoarthritis and a matched, asymptomatic, volunteers (controls) group aimed to determine spinopelvic differences between the two groups and their consequences for total hip arthroplasty.Methods104 patients (52 in each group) had their sagittal spinopelvic parameters (lumbar lordosis angle, sacral slope, pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence, and the pelvic-femoral angle) measured in the standing, relaxed-seated, and deep-flexed seated positions. Spinopelvic movement was calculated as the change between the different positions, and individual spinopelvic mobility was classified in accordance with the change in pelvic tilt as previously described (ΔPT: stiff (<10°), normal (10-30°), and hypermobile (>30°)).ResultsTransitioning from the standing to relaxed-seated position, patients demonstrated 13? less hip flexion (P < .001), 12? more posterior pelvic tilt (P = .006), and 6? more lumbar flexion (P = .038) compared with controls. Transitioning from the standing to deep-flexed seated position, patients demonstrated 18? less hip flexion (P < .001), accompanied by a posterior and not an anterior pelvic tilt as in the controls (7? ± 14 vs ?6? ± 17; P < .001). Patients showed a higher percentage of spinopelvic hypermobility (19% vs 2%; P = .008).ConclusionThe reduced ability of flexion in the arthritic hip, leads to posterior pelvic tilt in the relaxed-seated position. This is associated with a likely compensatory increased lumbar flexion to keep an upright position. Therefore, spinopelvic hypermobility has to be defined as pathologic. When moving to the deep-flexed seated position, decreased flexion of the arthritic hip prevents the pelvis from tilting anteriorly while the lumbar spine performs a compensatory flexion by approximately the same amount compared with controls.Level of EvidenceLevel II, diagnostic study.     

Intra-Articular Hyaluronic Acid Injections Less Than 6 Months Before Total Hip Arthroplasty: Is It Safe? A Retrospective Cohort Study in 565 Patients

BackgroundIntra-articular hyaluronic acid (IAHA) can be injected into an osteoarthritic hip joint to reduce pain and to improve functionality. Several studies report IAHA to be safe, with minor adverse effects that normally disappear spontaneously within a week. However, intra-articular corticosteroids prior to total hip arthroplasty (THA) have been associated with increased infection rates. This association has never been investigated for IAHA and THA. We aimed to assess the influence of IAHA on the outcome of THA, with an emphasis on periprosthetic joint infection (PJI).MethodsAt a mean follow-up of 52 months (±18), we compared complication rates, including superficial and deep PJIs, of THA in patients who received an IAHA injection ≤6 months prior to surgery (injection group) with that of patients undergoing THA without any previous injection in the ipsilateral hip (control group). One hundred thirteen patients (118 hips) could be retrospectively included in the injection group, and 452 patients (495 hips) in the control group.ResultsNo differences in baseline characteristics nor risk factors for PJI between the 2 groups were found. The clinical outcomes in terms of VAS pain scores (1.4 vs 1.7 points, P = .11), modified Harris Hip Scores (77 vs 75 points, P = .09), and Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (79 vs 76 points, P = .24) did not differ between the injection group and the control group. Also, complications in terms of persistent wound leakage (0% vs 1.2%, P = .60), thromboembolic events (0% vs 0.6%, P = 1.00), periprosthetic fractures (1.7% vs 1.2%, P = .65), and dislocations (0% vs 0.4%, P = 1.00) did not differ. However, in the injection group there was a higher rate of PJIs (4% vs 0%, P < .001) and postoperative wound infections (9% vs 3%, P = .01), compared to the control group.ConclusionOur findings suggest that IAHA performed 6 months or less prior to THA may pose a risk for increased rates of PJI. We recommend refraining from performing THA within 6 months after IAHA administration.     

Lumbar Spine Degeneration and Flatback Deformity Alter Sitting-Standing Spinopelvic Mechanics—Implications for Total Hip Arthroplasty

BackgroundSpinal degeneration and lumbar flatback deformity can decrease recruitment of protective posterior pelvic tilt when sitting, leading to anterior impingement and increased instability. We aim at analyzing regional and global spinal alignment between sitting and standing to better understand the implications of spinal degeneration and flatback deformity for hip arthroplasty.MethodsSpinopelvic parameters of patients with full-body sitting-standing stereoradiographs were assessed: lumbar lordosis (LL), spinopelvic tilt (SPT), pelvic incidence minus LL (PI-LL), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), and T1 pelvic angle (TPA). Lumbar spines were classified as normal, degenerative (disc height loss >50%, facet arthropathy, or spondylolisthesis), or flatback (degenerative criteria and PI-LL >10°). Independent t-tests and analysis of variance were used to analyze alignment differences between groups.ResultsAfter propensity matching for age, sex, and hip osteoarthritis grade, 57 patients per group were included (62 ± 11 years, 58% female). Mean standing and sitting SPT, PI-LL, SVA, and TPA increased along the spectrum of disease severity. Increasing severity of disease was associated with decreasing standing and sitting LL. The flatback group demonstrated the greatest sitting SPT, PI-LL, SVA, and TPA. The amount of sitting-to-standing change in SPT, LL, PI-LL, SVA, and TPA decreased along the spectrum of disease severity.ConclusionSpinal degeneration and lumbar flatback deformity both significantly decrease lower lumbar spine mobility and posterior SPT from standing to sitting in a stepwise fashion. The demonstrated hypomobility in flatback patients likely serves as a pathomechanism for the previously observed increased risk of dislocation in total hip arthroplasty.     

Variability in Acetabular Component Position in Patients Undergoing Direct Anterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty Who Have Concomitant Spine Pathology

BackgroundHip instability following total hip arthroplasty (THA) can be a major cause of revision surgery. Physiological patient position impacts acetabular anteversion and abduction, and influences the functional component positioning. Osteoarthritis of the spine leads to abnormal spinopelvic biomechanics and motion, but there is no consensus on the degree of component variability for THAs performed by anterior approach. Therefore, we sought to present guidelines for changes in acetabular component positioning between supine and standing positions for patients undergoing primary THA by a uniform anterior approach.MethodsPerioperative patient radiographs of the pelvis and lumbar spine were collected. Images were used to determine acetabular component positioning and degree of coexisting spinal pathology, categorized as a Lane Grade (LG). Final analysis of variance was performed on a sample size of 643 anterior primary THAs.ResultsFrom supine to standing position, as the severity of lumbar pathology increased the change in anteversion also increased (LG:0 = ?0.11° ± 4.65°, LG:1 = 2.02° ± 4.09°, LG:2-3 = 5.78° ± 5.72°, P < .001). The mean supine anteversion in patients with absent lumbar pathology was 19.72° ± 5.05° and was lower in patients with worsening lumbar pathology (LG:1 = 18.25° ± 4.81°, LG:2-3 = 16.73° ± 5.28°, P < .001).ConclusionPatients undergoing primary THA by anterior approach with worsening spinal pathology have larger increases in component anteversion when transitioning from supine to standing positions. Consideration should be given to this expected variability when placing the patient’s acetabular component.     

Lumbar Spine Fusion and Symptoms of Leg Length Discrepancy After Hip Arthroplasty

BackgroundHip length discrepancy (HLD) is common after total hip arthroplasty (THA); however, the effect of spinal fusion on perceived leg length discrepancy (LLD) symptoms after THA has not been examined. This study tested the hypothesis that LLD symptoms are increased in patients who underwent lumbar spinal fusion and THA, compared with patients with THA only.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study included 67 patients who underwent lumbar spinal fusion and THA, along with 78 matched control patients who underwent THA only. Hip and spine measurements were taken on postoperative, standing anterior-posterior pelvic, lateral lumbar, and anterior-posterior lumbar spinal radiographs. Perceived LLD symptoms were assessed via telephone survey.ResultsBetween the spinal fusion and control groups, there was no significant difference in HLD (M = 7.10 mm, SE = 0.70 and M = 5.60 mm, SE = 0.49) (P = .403). The spinal fusion patients reported more frequently noticing a difference in the length of their legs than the control group (P = .046) and reported limping “all the time” compared with the control group (P = .001). Among all patients with an HLD ≤10 mm, those in the spinal fusion group reported limping at a higher frequency than patients in the control group (P = .008). Patients in the spinal fusion group were also more likely to report worsened back pain after THA (P = .011) than the control group.ConclusionFrequencies of a perceived LLD, limping, and worsened back pain after THA were increased in patients with THA and a spinal fusion compared with patients who had THA only, even in a population with HLD traditionally considered to be subclinical. The results indicate that in patients with prior spinal fusion, precautions should be taken to avoid even minor LLD in the setting of THA.     

Total Hip Arthroplasty With Subtrochanteric Shortening Osteotomy in Patients With High Hip Dislocation Secondary to Childhood Septic Arthritis: A Matched Comparative Study With Crowe IV Developmental Dysplasia

BackgroundTotal hip arthroplasty (THA) with subtrochanteric shortening osteotomy (SSO) is performed to manage hips with high dislocations. We compared outcomes of THA with SSO in patients with high hip dislocation resulting from childhood septic arthritis and Crowe IV developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH).MethodsWe reviewed 60 THAs with SSO performed between May 1996 and December 2013. Thirty-one cases were classified as sequelae of childhood infection and 29 as DDH. Twenty-five hips were selected for each group after the propensity score was matched with preoperative demographics and leg length discrepancy (LLD). Clinical scores, complication and reoperation rates, radiographic results, and survivorships were compared. The mean duration of follow-up was 12.3 (range 5-22) years.ResultsThe average correction in LLD was 2.5 cm for childhood infection and 3.6 cm for DDH (P = .002). The infection group received more transfusions (mean 3.3 vs 2.0 units, P = .002), required more time for union of osteotomy site (mean 6.8 vs 5.2 months, P = .042), and reported lower Harris Hip Score (mean 85.1 vs 91.3, P = .017). Reoperations were performed in 11 (44%) previously infected hips and 3 (12%) DDHs (P = .012). Kaplan-Meier survivorship with an endpoint of revision for any reason was lower in the infection group (83.6%) than in the DDH group (100%) at 10 years (log rank, P = .040).ConclusionTHA with SSO in high hip dislocation secondary to childhood septic arthritis demonstrated less favorable clinical outcomes with increased risks of complication, compared with those performed in Crowe IV DDH with similar degree of chronic dislocation.     

Target Price Adjustment for Hip Fractures Is Not Sufficient in the Bundled Payments for Care Improvement Initiative

BackgroundUnder the Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (BPCI) initiative, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) adjusts the target price for total hip arthroplasty (THA) based upon the historical proportion of fracture cases. Concerns exist that hospitals that care for hip fracture patients may be penalized in BPCI. The purpose of this study is to compare the episode-of-care (EOC) costs of hip fracture patients to elective THA patients.MethodsWe reviewed a consecutive series of 4096 THA patients from 2015 to 2018. Patients were grouped into elective THA (n = 3686), fracture THA (n = 176), and hemiarthroplasty (n = 274). Using CMS claims data, we compared EOC costs, postacute care costs, and performance against the target price between the groups. To control for confounding variables, we performed a multivariate analysis to identify the effect of hip fracture diagnosis on costs.ResultsElective THA patients had lower EOC ($18,200 vs $42,605 vs $38,371; P < .001) and postacute care costs ($4477 vs $28,093 vs $23,217; P < .001) than both hemiarthroplasty and THA for fracture. Patients undergoing arthroplasty for fracture lost an average of $23,122 (vs $1648 profit for elective THA; P < .001) with 91% of cases exceeding the target price (vs 20% for elective THA; P < .001). In multivariate analysis, patients undergoing arthroplasty for fracture had higher EOC costs by $19,492 (P < .001).ConclusionPatients undergoing arthroplasty for fracture cost over twice as much as elective THA patients. CMS should change their methodology or exclude fracture patients from BPCI, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic.     

Hip Resurfacing: A Single Surgeon U.S. Series With Minimum Ten-Year Follow-up

BackgroundMetal-on-metal hip resurfacing is an alternative to total hip arthroplasty (THA). The aim of this study was to determine implant survivorship, analyze patient-reported outcomes measures and to determine patient satisfaction for patients who underwent metal-on-metal hip resurfacing at a large US academic institution by a single surgeon with a minimum of 10-year follow-up.MethodsPatients who underwent hip resurfacing from September 2006 through November 2009 were included. Patient demographics and variables were collected from a prospectively maintained institutional database and patients completed an additional questionnaire with patient-reported outcomes measures.ResultsA total of 350 patients (389 hips) out of 371 (433 hips) with a minimum 10-year follow-up were successfully contacted (94.3% follow-up). Mean age was 53 years, 258 were male (73%). 377 out of 389 hips (96.9%) did not require additional surgery. Gender was significantly related to implant survivorship (males 99.0%, females 90.9%; P < .001). 330 patients (369 hips, 94.8%) were satisfied with their surgery. Males had higher proportion of satisfaction scores (P = .02) and higher modified Harris Hip Score (odds ratio = 2.63 (1.39, 4.98), P = .003). Median modified Harris Hip Score score for non-revised hips was 84.0 [80.0; 86.0] versus those requiring revision, 81.5 [74.0; 83.0], (P = .009).ConclusionAt a minimum 10-year follow-up, hip resurfacing, using an implant with a good track record, demonstrates 99.0% survivorship in male patients with an average age of 52 years. We believe that the continued use of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty in this population is justified by both positive patient reported outcomes and survivorship.     

Cannabis Use Does Not Affect Outcomes After Total Hip Arthroplasty

BackgroundCannabis use in patients undergoing arthroplasty has increased with ongoing legalization throughout the United States. The purpose of this study was to report total hip arthroplasty (THA) outcomes in patients self-reporting cannabis use.MethodsThere were 74 patients who underwent primary THA from January 2014 to December 2019 at a single institution with minimum 1-year follow-up who had their self-reported cannabis use retrospectively reviewed. Patients who had a history of alcohol or illicit drug abuse were excluded. A match control was conducted based on age; body mass index; sex; Charlson Comorbidity Index; insurance status; and use of nicotine, narcotics, antidepressants, or benzodiazepines to patients undergoing THA who did not self-report cannabis use. Outcomes included Harris Hip Score (HHS), Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Reconstruction (HOOS JR), in hospital morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) consumed, outpatient MMEs prescribed, in hospital lengths of stay (LOS), postoperative complications, and readmissions.ResultsThere was no difference in the preoperative, postoperative, or change in Harris Hip Score or HOOS JR between cohorts. There was also no difference in hospital MMEs consumed (102.4 versus 101, P = .92), outpatient MMEs prescribed (119 versus 156, P = .11) or lengths of stay (1.4 versus 1.5 days, P = .32). Also, readmissions (4 versus 4, P = 1.0) and reoperations (2 versus 1, P = .56) were not different between groups.ConclusionSelf-reported cannabis use does not influence 1-year outcomes after THA. Further studies are warranted to determine the efficacy and safety of perioperative cannabis use after THA to help guide orthopaedic surgeons in counseling patients.     

Lack of correlation between hip osteoarthritis and anatomical spinopelvic parameters obtained in supine position on MRI

PurposeHip osteoarthritis (HOA) is known to have a multifactorial pathogenesis. Recent studies suggest that spinopelvic alignment may represent an important additional pathogenic abnormality resulting in HOA. This study aims to assess the correlation between spinopelvic parameters (pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS) and lumbar lordosis (LL)) obtained in the supine position on MRI and HOA, lateral center edge (LCE) angle, and patient reported back pain.MethodsAsymptomatic participants from the whole-body MRI cohort (FF4) from the cross-sectional case-control “Cooperative Health Research in the Region of Augsburg” study (KORA) were included. Whole-body MRI was performed in a standardized fashion in each case, on which hip osteoarthritis (HOA), anatomical spinopelvic parameters and lateral center edge angle were measured. Presence of back pain was assessed using a standardized questionnaire. Correlations were estimated by logistic regression models providing odds ratio.ResultsAmong 340 subjects (mean age 56.3 ± 9.3 years; 56.5% male), HOA was present in 89.1% (male: 87.0%, female: 91.7%, p = 0.17). The LCE angle was 30.0° ± 5.5 (men: 29.8° ± 5.9; women: 30.1° ± 5.1; p = 0.696). Mean PI was 54.0° ± 11.3°, PT was 13.7° ± 5.9°, SS was 40.3° ± 8.8° (significantly smaller in women p<0.05) and LL was 36.4° ± 9.6° (significantly greater in women p<0.05). None of the spinopelvic parameters correlated significantly with hip osteoarthritis or LCE angle. HOA was not correlated with back pain.ConclusionSpinopelvic parameters as measured in the supine position on MRI, do not correlate with hip osteoarthritis or lateral center edge angle.     

Return to Work Following Total Knee and Hip Arthroplasty: The Effect of Patient Intent and Preoperative Work Status

BackgroundThe ability of total knee and hip arthroplasty (TKA/THA) to facilitate return to work (RTW) when it is the patient’s preoperative intent to do so remains unclear. We aimed at determining whether TKA/THA facilitated RTW in patients of working age who intended to return.MethodsThis is a prospective cohort study of 173 consecutive patients <65 years of age, undergoing unilateral TKA (n = 82: median age 58; range, 39-65; 36 [43.9%] male) or THA (n = 91: median age 59; range, 34-65; 42 [46.2%] male) during 2018. Oxford knee/hip scores, Oxford-Activity and Participation Questionnaire, and EuroQol-5 dimension (EQ-5D) scores were measured preoperatively and at 1 year when an employment questionnaire was also completed.ResultsOf patients who intended to RTW, 44 of 52 (84.6%) RTW by 1 year following TKA (at mean 14.8 ± 8.4 weeks) and 53 of 60 (88.3%) following THA (at mean 13.6 ± 7.5 weeks). Failure to RTW despite intent was associated with job physicality for TKA (P = .004) and negative preoperative EQ-5D for THA (P = .01). In patients unable to work before surgery due to joint disease, fewer RTW: 4 of 21 (19.0%) after TKA; and 6 of 17 (35.3%) after THA. Preoperative Oxford knee score >18.5 predicted RTW with 74% sensitivity (P < .001); preoperative Oxford hip score >19.5 predicted RTW with 75% sensitivity (P < .001). Preoperative EQ-5D indices were similarly predictive (P < .001).ConclusionIn this United Kingdom study, preoperative intent to RTW was the most powerful predictor of actual RTW following TKA/THA. Where patients intend to RTW following TKA/THA, 85% RTW following TKA and 88% following THA.     

Hip Arthroplasty Outcomes for Femoral Neck Fractures in Transplant Patients

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to compare the short-term complications between transplant and nontransplant patients who undergo hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures (FNFs). Additionally, we sought to further compare the outcomes of total hip arthroplasty (THA) versus hemiarthroplasty (HA) within the transplant group.MethodsThis was a retrospective review utilizing the Nationwide Readmissions Database. Transplant patients were identified and stratified based on transplant type: kidney, liver, or other (heart, lung, bone marrow, and pancreas). Outcomes of interest included index hospitalization mortality, perioperative complications, length of stay, costs, hospital readmission, and surgical complications within 90 days of discharge.ResultsFrom 2010 to 2018, a total of 881,061 patients underwent THA or HA for FNFs, of which 2163 (0.2%) were transplant patients. When compared with nontransplant patients, all transplant patients had an increased risk of requiring blood transfusion (odds ratio [OR] = 1.51, P = .001), acute kidney injury (OR = 2.02, P < .001), and discharge to facility (OR = 1.67, P = .001) while having increased index hospitalization length of stay and costs. Liver and other transplant patients had an increased risk of readmission within 90 days (OR = 1.82, P < .001 and OR = 1.60, P = .014 respectively). Subgroup analysis for transplant patients comparing HA with THA demonstrated no differences in perioperative complication rates and decreased hospitalization length of stay and cost associated with THA.ConclusionIn this retrospective cohort study, transplant patients had an increased risk of requiring blood transfusions and acute kidney injury after hip arthroplasty for FNFs. There were no differences in short-term complications between transplant patients treated with HA versus THA.Level of evidence3 (Retrospective cohort study).     

Improvement in Sleep Patterns After Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Study in 780 Patients

BackgroundThis study assessed change in sleep patterns before and after total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and its relationship to patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).MethodsBetween July 2016 and June 2018, surgical data and PROMs were collected on 780 subjects before and 12 months after THA or TKA. PROMs included Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, patient satisfaction, and 2 questions from the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index.ResultsBefore surgery, 35% (270 of 780) reported poor quality sleep. Sleep quality and duration were worse in females over males, and in THA patients (39%) over TKA patients (30%; P = .011). Of those reporting bad sleep, 74% (201 of 270) were improved after arthroplasty. Satisfaction was higher in subjects reporting good sleep quality (626 of 676; 93%) compared with those reporting bad sleep quality (67 of 86; 78%) (P = .001). Sleep was positively correlated with better Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score/Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (r = 0.2-0.3).ConclusionImprovement in sleep quality and duration can be expected after THA and TKA and is associated with better outcome scores and satisfaction.     

Participation in Sports and Physical Activities After Total Joint Arthroplasty

BackgroundQuality data on physical activity participation following total joint arthroplasty (TJA) are limited. The purpose of this study was to explore patient participation, outcomes, and limitations in sports/physical activities following TJA.MethodsPatients who underwent total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) at a single institution from 2015 to 2020 were surveyed on sports/physical activity participation before and after TJA. Data were correlated with perioperative demographic and outcome scores. In total, 2,366 patients were surveyed: 788 (33.3%) underwent THA, 1,175 (49.7%) underwent TKA, and 403 (17.0%) underwent both THA/TKA.ResultsParticipation rates were 69.2, 61.5, and 61.3% at one year prior and 86.8, 81.5, and 81.6% at five years prior to THA, TKA, and THA/TKA, respectively. Participation rates were 73.1, 72.0, and 60.8% at mean 4.0 years postoperatively. Weekly time spent (P < .05) and exertion levels (P < .001) increased postoperatively for all three cohorts. For all three cohorts, the most common sports/activities were recreational walking, cycling, swimming, and golf, while intermediate- and high-impact activity participation decreased postoperatively. Independent predictors of postoperative sports/physical activity participation were younger age [THA (P < .001); TKA (P = .010)], lower body mass index [THA (P < .001); TKA (P < .001)], fewer comorbidities [THA (P < .001)], and higher postoperative Hip Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Junior[THA (P = .012)], Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Junior[TKA (P = .004)], 12-Item Short Form Physical Component Score[THA (P < .001); TKA (P < .001); THA/TKA (P = .004)], and 12-Item Short Form Mental Component Score[TKA (P = .004)] scores. Activity restrictions were reported among 17.5, 20.9, and 25.1% of THA, TKA, and THA/TKA patients, respectively, and were more commonly self-imposed than surgeon-directed for all cohorts.ConclusionThough sports/physical activity participation may improve following TJA compared to one year preoperatively, participation is decreased compared to five years preoperatively, transitions to low-impact activities, and varies among subsets of patients.