COVID-19 Modulates Inflammatory and Renal Markers That May Predict Hospital Outcomes among African American Males

Background and Objectives: African Americans and males have elevated risks of infection, hospitalization, and death from SARS-CoV-2 in comparison with other populations. We report immune responses and renal injury markers in African American male patients hospitalized for COVID-19. Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective study of 56 COVID-19 infected hospitalized African American males 50+ years of age selected from among non-intensive care unit (ICU) and ICU status patients. Demographics, hospitalization-related variables, and medical history were collected from electronic medical records. Plasma samples collected close to admission (≤2 days) were evaluated for cytokines and renal markers; results were compared to a control group (n = 31) and related to COVID-19 in-hospital mortality. Results: Among COVID-19 patients, eight (14.2%) suffered in-hospital mortality; seven (23.3%) in the ICU and one (3.8%) among non-ICU patients. Interleukin (IL)-18 and IL-33 were elevated at admission in COVID-19 patients in comparison with controls. IL-6, IL-18, MCP-1/CCL2, MIP-1α/CCL3, IL-33, GST, and osteopontin were upregulated at admission in ICU patients in comparison with controls. In addition to clinical factors, MCP-1 and GST may provide incremental value for risk prediction of COVID-19 in-hospital mortality. Conclusions: Qualitatively similar inflammatory responses were observed in comparison to other populations reported in the literature, suggesting non-immunologic factors may account for outcome differences. Further, we provide initial evidence for cytokine and renal toxicity markers as prognostic factors for COVID-19 in-hospital mortality among African American males.     

Predictors of new-onset diabetic ketoacidosis in patients with moderate to severe COVID-19 receiving parenteral glucocorticoids: A prospective single-centre study among Indian type 2 diabetes patients

Background and aimCOVID-19 infection predisposes to diabetic ketoacidosis(DKA); whether glucocorticoids enhances this risk is unknown.We aimed to study the occurrence of DKA after initiating glucocorticoids in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus(T2DM) and moderate-to-severe COVID-19, and identify predictors for it.MethodsPatients with T2DM and moderate or severe COVID-19 infection were prospectively observed for development of new-onset DKA for one week following initiation of parenteral dexamethasone. Clinical and biochemical parameters were compared between those who developed DKA (Group A) and those who didnot (Group B). Logistic regression was done to identify independent risk-factors predicting DKA; ROC-curve analysis to determine cut-offs for the parameters in predicting DKA.ResultsAmongst 302 patients screened, n = 196 were finally included, of whom 13.2% (n = 26,Group A) developed DKA. Patients in Group A were younger, had lower BMI, increased severity of COVID-19 infection, higher HbA1c%, CRP, IL-6, D-dimer and procalcitonin at admission (p_all < 0.02). Further, admission BMI (OR: 0.43, CI: 0.27–0.69), HbA1c % (OR: 1.68, CI: 1.16–2.43) and serum IL-6 (OR: 1.02, CI: 1.01–1.03) emerged as independent predictors for DKA. Out of these, IL-6 levels had the highest AUROC (0.93, CI: 0.89–0.98) with a cut-off of 50.95 pg/ml yielding a sensitivity of 88% and specificity of 85.2% in predicting DKA.ConclusionThere is significant incidence of new-onset DKA following parenteral glucocorticoids in T2DM patients with COVID-19, especially in those with BMI <25.56 kg/m², HbA1c% >8.35% and IL-6 levels >50.95 pg/ml at admission.     

Timeline of Oxygen Demand in Patients with COVID-19 Pneumonia

Objective In patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), understanding the timeline of oxygen demand and severe respiratory failure, such as intensive care unit (ICU) admission, may clarify the therapeutic window when home-care treatment is possible and help determine the timing of treatment in hospitalized patients to improve the respiratory status. We examined the timeline of respiratory status in hospitalized patients with moderate-to-severe COVID-19 in terms of oxygen demand and ICU admission. Methods We retrospectively assessed all patients with COVID-19 who were admitted to our hospital between February 2020 and February 2021 and required supplemental oxygen. This study included 66 patients who were transferred to the ICU (ICU patients) and 144 patients who were not transferred to the ICU (non-ICU patients). Results In the total cohort, the median duration from symptom onset to the need for supplemental oxygen was 8 [interquartile range (IQR) 6-10] days. This duration was significantly shorter in ICU patients than in non-ICU patients [8 (IQR 6-9) vs. 9 (IQR 6-10) days, p=0.02]. The median duration from symptom onset to ICU admission was 9 (IQR 8-11) days in severely ill patients. The median duration from the initiation of supplemental oxygen to ICU admission was 1.0 (IQR 1-2.75) days. Only 2 of 66 patients (3.0%) were admitted to the ICU six days or later after the initiation of supplemental oxygen. Conclusion Physicians should carefully monitor each patient''s condition after eight days from symptom onset. New therapies and their early administration are needed to reduce the frequency of respiratory failure in COVID-19 patients.     

Hospitalizaciones y mortalidad por COVID-19 en pacientes con enfermedades inflamatorias reumáticas en Andalucía

ObjectiveTo describe whether rheumatic inflammatory diseases (RID) are associated with a higher risk of hospitalization and/or mortality from COVID-19 and identify the factors associated with hospitalization and mortality in RID and COVID-19 in different Hospitals in Andalusia.MethodsDesign: Multicentre observational case-control study. Patients: RID and COVID-19 from different centres in Andalusia. Controls: patients without RIS matched by sex, age and CRP-COVID.Protocol A list of patients with PCR for COVID-19 was requested from the microbiology service from March 14 to April 14, 2020. The patients who had RID were identified and then consecutively a paired control for each case.Variables The main outcome variable was hospital admission and mortality from COVID-19.Statistical analysis Bivariate followed by binary logistic regression models (DV: mortality/hospital admission).ResultsOne hundred and fifty-six patients were included, 78 with RID and COVID-19 and 78 without RID with COVID-19. The patients did not present characteristics of COVID-19 disease different from the general population, nor did they present higher hospital admission or mortality. The factor associated with mortality in patients with RID was advanced age (OR [95% CI], 1.1 [1.0-1.2]; p = 0.025), while the factors associated with hospitalization were advanced age (OR [95% CI], 1.1 [1.0-1.1]; p = 0.007) and hypertension (OR [95% CI], 3.9 [1.5-6.7]; p = 0.003).ConclusionMortality and hospital admission due to COVID-19 do not seem to increase in RID. Advanced age was associated with mortality in RID and, in addition, HTN was associated with hospital admission.     

Clinical characteristics and determinants of mortality in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients on an intensive care unit—a retrospective explorative 1-year all-comers study

BackgroundClinical outcome in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) requiring treatment on intensive care units (ICU) remains unfavourable. The aim of this retrospective study was to exploratively identify potential predictors of unfavourable outcome in ICU patients diagnosed with COVID-19.MethodsIn all patients with COVID-19 (n=50) or severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) as comorbidity (n=11) at our ICU we assessed clinical, respiratory and laboratory parameters with a potential role for outcome. Main outcome variables were intubation and mortality rates.ResultsBetween March 2020 and March 2021, 573 patients were hospitalized with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Of these, 61 patients (10.6%, 44.3% women) aged 66.4±13.3 were admitted to ICU. A proportion of 73.8% of patients had moderate or severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). COVID-19 patients differed clinically from those with SARS-CoV-2 as comorbidity, such as severe heart or renal failure or sepsis as the leading cause of ICU admission, despite similar mortality rates (44.0% vs. 45.5%, P>0.5). Among COVID-19 patients, those who died had more often severe ARDS (91% vs. 46%, P=0.001), longer non-invasive ventilation (NIV) therapy prior to ICU (6.3±5.9 vs. 2.5±2.0 days, P=0.046), and higher interleukin-6 (IL-6) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) values as compared to survivors. In multivariable analysis, NIV duration ≥5 days on admission [odds ratio (OR): 42.20, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.22 to >99, P=0.038] and IL-6 [OR: 4.08, 95% CI: 1.16–14.33, P=0.028] remained independently predictive of mortality. In worsening tertiles of partial pressure of oxygen (pO₂)/inspiratory oxygen fraction (FiO₂) on admission (≥161.5, 96.5 to <161.5, <96.5) we observed a stepwise increase in intubation rates (P=0.0034) and mortality rates (P=0.031).ConclusionsAs inflammation, ARDS severity and longer NIV duration prior to ICU are associated with intubation and mortality rates, prognosis appears to be largely determined by disease severity. Whether NIV aggravates ARDS or if it indicates lack of recovery independent from type of ventilation, or both should be clarified in a prospective trial.     

The effect of transpyloric enteral nutrition on inflammatory response and prognosis for patients with Corona Virus Disease-19 in intensive care unit: A STROBE compliant study

To investigate the effect of transpyloric enteral nutrition (TEN) on NLRP1, inflammatory response and prognosis for patients with Corona Virus Disease-19 (COVID-19) in intensive care unit (ICU). The present prospective observational study included 29 cases of COVID-19 patients in ICU who admitted to our hospital during February 2020 to March 2020. All the patients were divided into gastrogavage groups (n = 16) and TEN group (n = 13) according to route of enteral nutrition. Serum levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-1 β (IL-1β), interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and NLRP1 (NLR family pyrin domain containing 1) was detected by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Serum levels of lymphocyte, albumin and hemoglobin was detected using an automatic biochemical analyzer. Patients’ demographic and clinical characteristics were collected and analyzed. Kaplan–Meier (K-M) curve was conducted for survival analysis and receiver operating characteristic curve was used for the analysis of diagnostic value of biomarkers. All the patients were followed-up for 3 months. This study found that the survival group had higher rate of TEN therapies than the deceased. COVID-19 patients in ICU on TEN had lower APACHE II scores, frequency of feeding suspension and mortality, however, with higher content of albumin was found at 5th day. The incidence of nutritional intolerance including abdominal distension and gastric retention in patients on TEN was notably lower than those on gastrogavage. The serum levels of NLRP1, CRP, IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α decreased in a time-dependent manner, but patients on TEN had lower levels of NLRP1, CRP and IL-1β than patients on gastrogavage. A positive correlation was found among NLRP1 and inflammatory factors, and COVID-19 patients with lower NLRP1 had longer survival time. Serum NLRP1 also exhibited diagnostic value for the death of COVID-19 patients. TEN decreased inflammatory response and improved the prognosis for COVID-19 patients in ICU.     

Tocilizumab in the Management of COVID-19: A Preliminary Report

ImportancePneumonia due to COVID-19 can lead to respiratory failure and death due to the development of the acute respiratory distress syndrome. Tocilizumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting the interleukin-6 receptor, is being administered off-label to some patients with COVID-19, and although early small studies suggested a benefit, there are no conclusive data proving its usefulness.ObjectiveTo evaluate outcomes in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 with or without treatment with Tocilizumab.Design, setting, participantsRetrospective study of 1938 patients with confirmed COVID-19 pneumonia admitted to hospitals within the Jefferson Health system in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, between March 25, 2020 and June 17, 2020, of which 307 received Tocilizumab.ExposuresConfirmed COVID-19 pneumonia.Main outcomes and measuresOutcomes data related to length of stay, admission to intensive care unit (ICU), requirement of mechanical ventilation, and mortality were collected and analyzed.ResultsThe average age was 65.2, with 47% women; 36.4% were African-American. The average length of stay was 22 days with 26.3% of patients requiring admission to the ICU and 14.9% requiring mechanical ventilation. The overall mortality was 15.3%. Older age, admission to an ICU, and requirement for mechanical ventilation were associated with higher mortality. Treatment with Tocilizumab was also associated with higher mortality, which was mainly observed in subjects not requiring care in an ICU with estimated odds ratio (OR) of 2.9 (p = 0.0004). Tocilizumab treatment was also associated with higher likelihood of admission to an ICU (OR = 4.8, p < 0.0001), progression to requiring mechanical ventilation (OR = 6.6, p < 0.0001), and increased length of stay (OR = 16.2, p < 0.0001).Conclusion and relevanceOur retrospective analysis revealed an association between Tocilizumab administration and increased mortality, ICU admission, mechanical ventilation, and length of stay in subjects with COVID-19. Prospective trials are needed to evaluate the true effect of Tocilizumab in this condition.     

Burden of diabetes mellitus and its impact on COVID-19 patients: A meta-analysis of real-world evidence

Background & aimsCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) spreads rapidly and within no time, it has been declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization. Evidence suggests diabetes to be a risk factor for the progression and poor prognosis of COVID-19. Therefore, we aimed to understand the pooled prevalence of diabetes in patients infected with COVID-19. We also aimed to compute the risk of mortality and ICU admissions in COVID-19 patients with and without diabetes.MethodsA comprehensive literature search was performed in PubMed to identify the articles reporting the diabetes prevalence and risk of mortality or ICU admission in COVID-19 patients. The primary outcome was to compute the pooled prevalence of diabetes in COVID-19 patients. Secondary outcomes included risk of mortality and ICU admissions in COVID-19 patients with diabetes compared to patients without diabetes.ResultsThis meta-analysis was based on a total of 23007 patients from 43 studies. The pooled prevalence of diabetes in patients infected with COVID-19 was found to be 15% (95% CI: 12%–18%), p = <0.0001. Mortality risk was found to be significantly higher in COVID-19 patients with diabetes as compared to COVID-19 patients without diabetes with a pooled risk ratio of 1.61 (95% CI: 1.16–2.25%), p = 0.005. Likewise, risk of ICU admission rate was significantly higher in COVID-19 patients with diabetes as compared to COVID-19 patients without diabetes with a pooled risk ratio of 1.88 (1.20%–2.93%), p = 0.006.ConclusionThis meta-analysis found a high prevalence of diabetes and higher mortality and ICU admission risk in COVID-19 patients with diabetes.     

Puerperium could have better intensive care outcomes with acute respiratory distress syndrome caused by COVID-19

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) with (COVID-19 often result in mortality. Treatment outcomes among puerperant, when compared with non-pregnant women (NPW) with the same syndrome. Physiological changes underwent within the gestation period have a considerable impact on the immune system, respiratory system, cardiovascular function, and coagulation. Through this research, it was aimed to compare intensive care unit (ICU) follow-up and treatment results of postpartum-period patients with those of non-pregnant ones. During the first week of ICU, 23 puerperant COVID-19 patients with ARDS and 34 non-pregnant COVID-19 patients took part in the study. Age, height, and predictive body weight (PBW) at admission to the ICU were compared with the clinical parameters of disease severity, such as FiO2 (fraction of inspired oxygen), PaO2 (arterial oxygen partial pressure), Horowitz index (PaO2/FiO2), procalcitonin (PCT), and C-reactive protein (CRP). Respiration parameters were recorded a meta-vision back server. Demographic data, FiO2, PaO2, Horowitz index, PCT, CRP and respiration parameters values were similar in both groups. The duration of non-mechanical ventilation and number of patients were seen to be significantly greater among the puerperant group than control group (P; .04 and .002, respectively). The duration of mechanical ventilation was similar in both groups (P; .07), while the mortality rate was lower in the puerperant group (P; .004). The postpartum women with COVID-19 induced ARDS were observed to have better ICU follow-up results and lower mortality. However, it is considered that the present results need to be supported greater number of participants.     

Obesity as a risk factor for unfavourable outcomes in critically ill patients affected by Covid 19

Background and aimsRecent studies show that obesity is a risk factor for hospital admission and for critical care need in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The aim was to determine whether obesity is a risk factor for unfavourable health outcomes in patients affected by COVID-19 admitted to ICU.Methods and results95 consecutive patients with COVID-19 (78 males and 18 females) were admitted to ICU and included in the study. Height, weight, BMI, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) scores, CRP, CPK, ICU and hospital length of stay and comorbidities were evaluated. Participants with obesity had a lower 28 day survival rate from ICU admission than normal weight subjects. Cox proportional hazard model-derived estimates, adjusted for age, gender and comorbidity, confirmed the results of the survival analysis (HR:5.30,95%C.I.1.26–22.34). Obese subjects showed longer hospital and ICU stay as compared with normal weight counterpart.Subjects with obesity showed significantly higher CRP and CPK levels than normal weight subjects.ConclusionIn individuals with obesity, careful management and prompt intervention in case of suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection is necessary to prevent the progression of the disease towards severe outcomes and the increase of hospital treatment costs.     

凝血指标、炎症指标与COVID-19的关系研究

背景 COVID-19病情严重程度与凝血指标、炎症指标异常等存在一定关系。目的探讨凝血指标、炎症指标与COVID-19的关系。方法回顾性选取武汉大学人民医院2020年1—5月收治的COVID-19患者280例作为观察组,根据预后将其分为存活亚组(n=231)和死亡亚组(n=49)。另选取2020年3—9月本院健康体检者120例作为对照组。分别比较观察组与对照组、存活亚组与死亡亚组一般资料、凝血指标[包括凝血酶原时间(PT)、活化部分凝血活酶时间(APTT)、纤维蛋白原(FIB)、D-二聚体(D-D)]、炎症指标[包括C反应蛋白(CRP)、降钙素原(PCT)]。采用多因素Cox比例风险回归分析探讨COVID-19患者预后的影响因素,绘制受试者工作特征曲线(ROC曲线)分析凝血指标、炎症指标对COVID-19的诊断价值及其预后的预测价值。结果观察组PT长于对照组,血浆FIB、D-D水平及血清CRP、PCT水平高于对照组(P <0.05)。存活亚组年龄小于死亡亚组,冠心病发生率和血浆FIB、D-D及血清CRP、PCT水平低于死亡亚组,PT短于死亡亚组(P <0.05);多因素Cox比例风险回归分析结果显示:年龄[HR=2.869,95%CI(1.497,5.500)]、冠心病[HR=3.796,95%CI(1.680,8.579)]、PT[HR=2.596,95%CI(1.703,3.957)]、血浆D-D水平[HR=2.289,95%CI(1.473,3.557)]及血清CRP[HR=2.542,95%CI(1.607,4.021)]、PCT[HR=2.596,95%CI(1.724,3.910)]水平是COVID-19患者预后的影响因素(P <0.05)。ROC曲线分析结果显示,PT、血浆FIB水平、血浆D-D水平、血清CRP水平、血清PCT水平诊断COVID-19的ROC曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.592[95%CI(0.542,0.641)]、0.665[95%CI(0.616,0.711)]、0.680[95%CI(0.631,0.725)]、0.690[95%CI(0.642,0.735)]、0.632[95%CI(0.583,0.680)];PT、血浆D-D水平、血清CRP水平、血清PCT水平预测COVID-19患者预后的AUC分别为0.536[95%CI(0.479,0.596)]、0.593[95%CI(0.533,0.651)]、0.603[95%CI(0.543,0.660)]、0.637[95%CI(0.577,0.693)]。结论年龄、冠心病、PT、血浆D-D水平及血清CRP、PCT水平是COVID-19患者预后的影响因素,而凝血指标、炎症指标对COVID-19诊断及其预后预测并无较大价值。     

Evaluation of Cardiac Biomarkers and Expression Analysis of IL-1, IL-6, IL-10, IL-17, and IL-25 among COVID-19 Patients from Pakistan

Coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) is caused by viral infection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Where upregulation of several important biomarkers and multiple organ dysfunction occurs, this study aimed to evaluate the association of cardiac biomarkers and CS induced acute lung damage with disease severity and mortality in survival of COVID-19 patients. A total of 500 COVID-19 patients with elevated cardiac biomarkers were studied for the analysis of myocardial abnormality through cardiac enzymes, inflammatory biomarkers, and the expression analysis of various cytokines, including IL-1, IL-6, IL-10, IL-17, and IL-25 genes. The elevation of various cardiac enzymes including LDH (87%), CK (78.4%), TNI (80.4%), CK-MB (83%), and D-dimer (80.8%) were found correlated (p < 0.001) with COVID-19 infection. Cardiac enzyme elevation was highly associated with an increased level of inflammatory biomarkers such as CRP (14.2%), SAA (11.4%) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (7.8%) (p = 0.001 for all). The quantitative expression analysis of IL-10, 1L-17, and 1L-25 were found to be high, while those of IL-1 and IL-6 were moderately elevated. The death-to-live ratio of COVID-19 patients was 457:43 indicating that the patients having elevated levels of both CKMB, D-dimer, CK and IL-1, IL-6, IL-10 and D-dimer, Troponin, CK and IL-1, IL-10 had high fatality rate (73% and 12% respectively). The current finding concludes that the evaluation of cardiac biomarkers with cytokine storm plays a significant role in COVID-19-associated anatomical organ damage, myocardial injury, and mortality. Physicians should pay special attention to cardiac biomarkers in patients with old age, inflammation, and comorbidities among COVID-19 infections.     

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundNon-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) patients represent a vulnerable population that may be susceptible to more severe COVID-19. Moreover, not only the underlying NAFLD may influence the progression of COVID-19, but the COVID-19 may affect the clinical course of NAFLD as well. However, comprehensive evidence on clinical outcomes in patients with NAFLD is not well characterized.ObjectivesTo systematically review and meta-analysis the evidence on clinical outcomes in NAFLD patients with COVID-19.MethodsMEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central were searched from inception through November 2020. Epidemiological studies assessing the clinical outcomes in COVID-19 patients with NAFLD were included. Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess study quality. Generic inverse variance method using RevMan was used to determine the pooled estimates using the random-effects model.ResultsFourteen studies consisting of 1851 NAFLD patients, were included. Significant heterogeneity was observed among the studies, and studies were of moderate to high quality [mean, (range):8 (6, 8)]. For NAFLD patients, the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for the severe COVID-19 was 2.60 (95%CI:2.24–3.02; p < 0.001) (studies,n:8), aOR for admission to ICU due to COVID-19 was 1.66 (95%CI:1.26–2.20; p < 0.001) (studies,n:2), and aOR for mortality for was 1.01 (95%CI:0.65–1.58; p = 0.96) (studies,n:2).ConclusionsAn increased risk of severe COVID-19 infection and admission to ICU due to COVID-19 with no difference in mortality was observed between NAFLD and non-NAFLD patients. Future studies should include the mortality outcome to conclusively elucidate the impact of NAFLD in patients with COVID-19.     

Statin therapy may protect against acute kidney injury in patients hospitalized for interstitial SARS-CoV2 pneumonia

Background and aimsCOVID-19-associated acute kidney injury (AKI) represents an independent risk factor for all-cause in-hospital death in patients with COVID-19. Chronic statin therapy use is highly prevalent in individuals at risk for severe COVID-19. Our aim is to assess whether patients under treatment with statins have a lower risk of AKI and in-hospital mortality during hospitalization for interstitial SARS-CoV2 pneumonia.Methods and resultsOur study is a prospective observational study on 269 consecutive patients admitted for COVID-19 pneumonia at the Internal Medicine Unit of IRCCS Sant'Orsola Hospital in Bologna, Italy. We compared the clinical characteristics between patients receiving statin therapy (n = 65) and patients not treated with statins and we assessed if chronic statin use was associated with a reduced risk for AKI, all-cause mortality, admission to ICU, and disease severity. Statin use was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of developing AKI (OR 0.47, IC 0.23 to 0.95, p 0.036) after adjustment for age, sex, BMI, hypertension, diabetes, and chronic kidney disease (CKD). Additionally, statin use was associated with reduced C-reactive protein (CRP) levels (p 0.048) at hospital admission. No significant impact in risk of all-cause mortality (HR 1.98, IC 0.71 to 5.50, p 0.191) and ICU admission (HR 0.93, IC 0.52 to 1.65, p 0.801) was observed with statin use, after adjustment for age, sex, BMI, hypertension, diabetes, and CKD.ConclusionThe present study shows a potential beneficial effect of statins in COVID-19-associated AKI. Furthermore, patients treated with statins before hospital admission for COVID-19 may have lower systemic inflammation levels.     

Comparison of clinical outcomes,demographic, and laboratory characteristics of hospitalized COVID-19 patients during major three waves driven by Alpha,Delta, and Omicron variants in Tehran,Iran

Introduction

This study is the first study in which demographic, laboratory data, and outcomes of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) patients due to the circulating SARS-CoV-2 infections caused by different variants (Alpha, Delta, and Omicron) are compared in Iran.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective study of confirmed hospitalized COVID-19 cases from April 9, 2021, to May 22, 2022. Demographic data and laboratory findings were extracted from patients' electronic medical records on the first day of admission to the hospital. All patients were followed up for outcomes related to COVID-19 including intensive care unit (ICU) admission and mortality rate.

Results

Of 760 confirmed hospitalized COVID-19 cases, 362, 298, and 100 represented patients during waves 4–6, respectively. During the Omicron wave, hospitalized patients were older than the other two waves and had a lower median level of C-reactive protein (CRP), alanine transaminase (ALT), aspartate transaminase (AST), and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). The median length of hospital stay during waves 4–6 was 5 days (interquartile range [IQR]: 4.0–8.0), 7 days (IQR: 6.0–11), and 6 days (IQR: 5.0–9.0), respectively (p < 0.001). The rate of ICU admission during waves 4–6 significantly increased.

Conclusions

Although the Omicron variant caused less severe disease, in older patients who were hospitalized due to Omicron infection, longer hospital and ICU stays were reported, which could be attributed to their old age. In particular, elderly patients are more vulnerable to severe COVID-19; otherwise, as expected, other laboratory parameters and clinical outcomes were in accordance with differences in pathogenicity and infectivity of these variants.     

Moderately hyperglycemia as an independent prognostic factor for the worse outcome of COVID-19

BackgroundBlood sugar (BS) has been proposed as a prognostic factor for COVID-19. In this historical cohort study we evaluated the association between admission time BS and COVID-19 outcome.MethodsFirst, hospitalized COVID-19 patients were divided into three groups; Non-diabetic patients with BS < 140 mg/dl (N = 394), non-diabetic patients with BS ≥ 140 mg/dl (N = 113) and diabetic patients (N = 315). Mortality, ICU admission, and length of hospital stay were compared between groups and odds ratio was adjusted using logistic regression.ResultsAfter adjustment with pre-existing conditions and drugs, it was shown that non-diabetic patients with BS ≥ 140 mg/dl are at increased risk of mortality (aOR 1.89 (0.99–3.57)) and ICU admission (aOR 2.62 (1.49–4.59)) even more than diabetic patients (aOR 1.72 (1.07–2.78) for mortality and aOR 2.28 (1.47–3.54) for ICU admission.ConclusionsAdmission time hyperglycemia predicts worse outcome of COVID-19 and BS ≥ 140 mg/dl is associated with a markedly increase in ICU admission and mortality.     

Adults with Congenital Heart Disease during the COVID-19 Era: One-Year Tertiary Center Experience

Background: Adult patients with congenital heart disease (ACHD) might be at high risk of Coronavirus disease- 2019 (COVID-19). This study aimed to report on a one-year tertiary center experience regards COVID-19 infection in ACHD patients. Methods: This is a one-year (March-2020 to March-2021) tertiary-center retrospective study that enrolled all ACHD patients; COVID-19 positive patients’ medical records, and management were reported. Results: We recorded 542 patients, 205 (37.8%) COVID-19-positive, and 337 (62.2%) COVID-19-negative patients. Palliated single ventricle and Eisenmenger syndrome patients were more vulnerable to COVID-19 infection (P < 0.05*). Cardiovascular COVID-19 complications were arrhythmias in 47 (22.9%) patients, heart failure in 39 (19.0%) patients, cyanosis in 12 (5.9%) patients, stroke/TIA in 5 (2.4%) patients, hypertension and infective endocarditis in 2 (1.0%) patients for each, pulmonary hypertension and pulmonary embolism in 1 (0.5%) patient for each. 11 (5.4%) patients were managed with home isolation, 147 (71.7%) patients required antibiotics, 32 (15.6%) patients required intensive care unit (ICU), 8 (3.9%) patients required inotropes, 7 (3.4%) patients required mechanical ventilation, and 2 (1.0%) patients required extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Thromboprophylaxis was given to all 46 (22.4%) hospitalized patients. American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association classification revealed that complex lesions, and FC-C/D categories were more likely to develop severe/critical symptoms, that required mechanical ventilation and ECMO (P < 0.05*). Mortality was reported in 3 (0.6%) patients with no difference between groups (P = 0.872). 193 (35.6%) patients were vaccinated. Conclusions: COVID-19 infection in ACHD patients require individualized risk stratification and management. Eisenmenger syndrome, single ventricle palliation, complex lesions, and FC-C/D patients were more vulnerable to severe/critical symptoms that required ICU admission, mechanical ventilation, and ECMO. The vaccine was mostly tolerable.     

QT Interval Monitoring with Handheld Heart Rhythm ECG Device in COVID-19 Patients

Background:QTc prolongation is an adverse effect of COVID-19 therapies. The use of a handheld device in this scenario has not been addressed.Objectives:To evaluate the feasibility of QTc monitoring with a smart device in COVID-19 patients receiving QTc-interfering therapies.Methods:Prospective study of consecutive COVID-19 patients treated with hydroxychloroquine ± azithromycin ± lopinavir-ritonavir. ECG monitoring was performed with 12-lead ECG or with KardiaMobile-6L. Both registries were also sequentially obtained in a cohort of healthy patients. We evaluated differences in QTc in COVID-19 patients between three different monitoring strategies: 12-lead ECG at baseline and follow-up (A), 12-lead ECG at baseline and follow-up with the smart device (B), and fully monitored with handheld 6-lead ECG (group C). Time needed to obtain an ECG registry was also documented.Results:One hundred and eighty-two COVID-19 patients were included (A: 119(65.4%); B: 50(27.5%); C: 13(7.1%). QTc peak during hospitalization did significantly increase in all groups. No differences were observed between the three monitoring strategies in QTc prolongation (p = 0.864). In the control group, all but one ECG registry with the smart device allowed QTc measurement and mean QTc did not differ between both techniques (p = 0.612), displaying a moderate reliability (ICC 0.56 [0.19–0.76]). Time of ECG registry was significantly longer for the 12-lead ECG than for handheld device in both cohorts (p < 0.001).Conclusion:QTc monitoring with KardiaMobile-6L in COVID-19 patients was feasible. Time of ECG registration was significantly lower with the smart device, which may offer an important advantage for prevention of virus dissemination among healthcare providers.     

Clinical course and prognostic factors of COVID-19 infection in an elderly hospitalized population

IntroductionOlder subjects have a higher risk of COVID-19 infection and a greater mortality. However, there is a lack of studies evaluating the characteristics of this infection at advanced age.Patients and methodsWe studied 404 patients ≥ 75 years (mean age 85.2 ± 5.3 years, 55 % males), with PCR-confirmed COVID-19 infection, attended in two hospitals in Madrid (Spain). Patients were followed-up until they were discharged from the hospital or until death.ResultsSymptoms started 2–7 days before admission, and consisted of fever (64 %), cough (59 %), and dyspnea (57 %). A total of 145 patients (35.9 %) died a median of 9 days after hospitalization. In logistic regression analysis, predictive factors of death were age (OR 1.086; 1.015–1.161 per year, p = 0.016), heart rate (1.040; 1.018–1.061 per beat, p < 0.0001), a decline in renal function during hospitalization (OR 7.270; 2.586–20.441, p < 0.0001) and worsening dyspnea during hospitalization (OR 73.616; 30.642–176.857, p < 0.0001). Factors predicting survival were a female sex (OR 0.271; 0.128–0.575, p = 0.001), previous treatment with RAAS inhibitors (OR 0.459; 0.222–0.949, p = 0.036), a higher oxygen saturation at admission (OR 0.901; 0.842–0.963 per percentage point increase, p = 0.002), and a greater platelet count (OR 0.995; 0.991–0.999 per 10⁶/L, p = 0.025).ConclusionElderly patients with COVID-19 infection have a similar clinical course to younger individuals. Previous treatment with RAAS inhibitors, and demographic, clinical and laboratory data influence prognosis.