Knee braces: current evidence and clinical recommendations for their use

Methods of preventing and treating knee injuries have changed with the rapid development and refinement of knee braces. Prophylactic knee braces are designed to protect uninjured knees from valgus stresses that could damage the medial collateral ligaments. However, no conclusive evidence supports their effectiveness, and they are not recommended for regular use. Functional knee braces are intended to stabilize knees during rotational and anteroposterior forces. They offer a useful adjunct to the treatment and rehabilitation of ligamentous knee injuries. Patellofemoral knee braces have been used to treat anterior knee disorders and offer moderate subjective improvement without significant disadvantages. Additional well-designed studies are needed to demonstrate objectively the benefits of all knee braces. Knee braces should be used in conjunction with a rehabilitation program that incorporates strength training, flexibility, activity modification and technique refinement.     

Efficacy of knee braces and foot orthoses in conservative management of knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review

A systematic analysis was conducted on the effectiveness of knee braces and foot orthoses in conservative management of knee osteoarthritis. The methodologic quality of the randomized clinical trials, controlled clinical trials, and observational studies were systematically reviewed using the Structured Effectiveness Quality Evaluation Scale. Twenty-five studies met the inclusion criteria. The orthoses used in the studies included Generation II osteoarthritis knee brace, valgus knee braces, functional off-loading knee braces, knee sleeves, lateral-wedged insoles with subtalar strapping, medial-wedged insoles, and specialized footwear. Results suggest that knee braces and foot orthoses are effective in decreasing pain, joint stiffness, and drug dosage. They also improve proprioception, balance, Kellgren/Lawrence grading, and physical function scores in subjects with varus and valgus knee osteoarthritis. Knee braces and foot orthoses could be cautiously considered as conservative management for relief of pain and stiffness and improving physical function for persons with knee osteoarthritis. The conclusions of this review are limited by methodologic considerations like poor quality of trials and heterogeneity of interventions.     

The effect of orthotic devices on knee adduction moment,pain and function in medial compartment knee osteoarthritis: a literature review

Background Knee braces and foot orthoses are commonly used to improve knee adduction moment, pain and function in subjects with knee osteoarthritis (OA). However, no literature review has been performed to compare the effects of foot orthoses and knee braces in this group of patients. Purpose The aim of this review was to evaluate the effects of foot orthoses and knee braces on knee adduction moment, pain and function in individuals with knee OA. Study design Literature review. Method The search strategy was based on the Population Intervention Comparison Outcome method. A search was performed in PubMed, Science Direct, Google Scholar and ISI web of knowledge databases using the PRISMA method and based on selected keywords. Thirty-one related articles were selected for final evaluation. Results The results of the analysis of these studies demonstrated that orthotic devices reduce knee adduction moment and also improve pain and function in individuals with knee OA. Conclusion Foot orthoses may be more effective in improving pain and function in subjects with knee OA. Both knee braces and foot orthoses reduce the knee adduction moment in knee OA and consequently patients typically do not need to use knee braces for a long period of time. Also, foot orthoses and knee braces may be more effective for medial compartment knee OA patients due to the fact that this treatment helps improve pain and function.

• Implications for Rehabilitation

• Knee braces and foot orthoses are commonly used for improving knee adduction moment, pain and function in subjects with knee osteoarthritis (OA).

• Orthotic devices can reduce knee adduction moment, pain and improve function in knee OA.

• The combined use of a knee braces and foot orthoses can provide more improvement in knee adduction moment, reduced pain and increased function.

     

Braces and splints for musculoskeletal conditions

Braces and splints can be useful for acute injuries, chronic conditions, and the prevention of injury. There is good evidence to support the use of some braces and splints; others are used because of subjective reports from patients, relatively low cost, and few adverse effects, despite limited data on their effectiveness. The unloader (valgus) knee brace is recommended for pain reduction in patients with osteoarthritis of the medial compartment of the knee. Use of the patellar brace for patellofemoral pain syndrome is neither recommended nor discouraged because good evidence for its effectiveness is lacking. A knee immobilizer may be used for a limited number of acute traumatic knee injuries. Functional ankle braces are recommended rather than immobilization for the treatment of acute ankle sprains, and semirigid ankle braces decrease the risk of future ankle sprains in patients with a history of ankle sprain. A neutral wrist splint worn full-time improves symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome. Close follow-up after bracing or splinting is essential to ensure proper fit and use.     

Role of orthoses in ligament injuries of the knee]

OBJECTIVE: To review the literature for the benefits of the three different knee braces (prophylactic, rehabilitation, functional) that can be used to treat ligament injuries of the knee. What is their influence on stability? Do they have adverse effects? Is their use justified? METHODS: We searched the Medline and Embase databases with use of the keywords knee, orthoses, brace, proprioception, stability, rehabilitation, physical therapy, and anterior cruciate ligament for reports published between 1980 and 2003 and selected 93 articles, expert reports or literature reviews. RESULTS: Anterior tibial displacement can be controlled with mechanical strains (150 N), which are lower than physiological restraints? (400 N). The control of joint position is improved by increasing proprioception. Soft tissue stiffness influences the control of anterior tibial displacement. The beneficial effects observed are mainly subjective. Our analysis of the literature showed limitations and variations in study methodologies. CONCLUSION: We did not find any justification for use of either prophylactic or rehabilitation braces. Functional braces can improve stability, as reported by the patient, and may be used in some situations.     

The effects of ankle bracing on motion of the knee and the hip joint during trunk rotation tasks

BACKGROUND: The use of prophylactic ankle braces is common during athletic activities since the ankle is one of the most commonly injured joints. Past studies have focused on the effects of ankle braces on ankle movement restriction, preventing injuries, proprioception, balance and athletic performance. However, the influence of ankle restriction on other joints has not been studied. The constraint of ankle movement may lead to an increased loading on the knee joint, which could be a potential risk of knee injuries during athletic activities. The primary goal of the current study was to determine quantitatively the effect of an ankle brace on the knee axial rotation during two different trunk turning tasks. METHODS: Ten healthy subjects performed trunk turning movements while standing on one leg: turning sideways to catch a ball and turning sideways to touch a target with the shoulder. The tasks were performed with and without an ankle brace worn on the supporting leg. The trunk axial rotation in reference to the floor and three dimensional joint angular motions of the ankle, knee and hip were determined. FINDINGS: The use of an ankle brace resulted in reduced trunk axial rotation during the ball catching tasks, and increased knee axial rotation during the target touching tasks. INTERPRETATION: The results of this study showed that the effect of the ankle brace on the knee axial rotation depended on the context of the tasks performed. Under situations that required forceful trunk turning movement while standing on a single leg, the ankle braces may cause an increase in the knee axial rotation indicating higher risk of knee injury.     

Lecture 16 ORTHOTICS Bracing the Lower Extremity

A long leg brace allows patients to walk despite weakness. When prescribing a brace, the physician should consider its six components—trunk attachment, thigh piece, knee joint, calf piece, ankle joint and foot piece. Short leg braces and foot braces pose different problems, but, like the long leg brace, they should be comfortable, durable and accomplish their purpose.     

Methods for evaluating the progression of osteoarthritis

This article discusses methods for evaluating the progression of osteoarthritis through dynamic functional imaging as opposed to current static techniques. Comparison is made between static and dynamic methods of evaluating knee alignment. The correlation between dynamic knee moments during gait and bone mineral content is discussed. Knee loading is considered in terms of high tibial osteotomy, knee braces, pain, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. New image-processing techniques for quantitating cartilage loss are described, and computational methods for generating true three-dimensional (3-D) maps of cartilage thickness are developed. Finally, new approaches to cross-correlate magnetic resonance images with kinematic measurements are described. These new techniques promise to become powerful diagnostic tools to detect and characterize pathological load distributions across articular cartilage.     

Assessment of functional knee bracing: an in vivo three-dimensional kinematic analysis of the anterior cruciate deficient knee

OBJECTIVE: To describe three-dimensional tibial and femoral movements in vivo and examine the effect of a brace on knee kinematics during moderate to intense activity. DESIGN: Skeletal kinematics of anterior cruciate ligament deficient knees was measured with and without braces during moderate to intense activity. BACKGROUND: Invasive markers implanted into the tibia and femur are the most accurate means to directly measure skeletal motion and may provide a more sensitive measure of the differences between brace conditions. METHODS: Steinmann traction pins were implanted into the femur and tibia of four subjects having a partial or complete anterior cruciate ligament rupture. Non-braced and braced conditions were randomly assigned and subjects jumped for maximal horizontal distance to sufficiently stress the anterior cruciate ligament. RESULTS: Intra-subject peak vertical force and posterior shear force were generally consistent between conditions. Intra-subject kinematics was repeatable but linear displacements between brace conditions were small. Differences in angular and linear skeletal motion were observed across subjects. Bracing the anterior cruciate ligament deficient knee resulted in only minor kinematic changes in tibiofemoral joint motion. CONCLUSION: In this study, no consistent reductions in anterior tibial translations were observed as a function of the knee brace tested. Relevance. Investigations have reported that knee braces fail when high loads are encountered or when load is applied in an unpredictable manner. Questions remain regarding tibiofemoral joint motion, in particular linear displacements. The pin technique is a means for direct skeletal measurement and may provide a more sensitive measure of the differences between brace conditions.     

Management of patellofemoral pain syndrome

Patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS) is the most common cause of knee pain in the outpatient setting. It is caused by imbalances in the forces controlling patellar tracking during knee flexion and extension, particularly with overloading of the joint. Risk factors include overuse, trauma, muscle dysfunction, tight lateral restraints, patellar hypermobility, and poor quadriceps flexibility. Typical symptoms include pain behind or around the patella that is increased with running and activities that involve knee flexion. Findings in patients with PFPS range from limited patellar mobility to a hypermobile patella. To confirm the diagnosis, an examination of the knee focusing on the patella and surrounding structures is essential. For many patients with the clinical diagnosis of PFPS, imaging studies are not necessary before beginning treatment. Radiography is recommended in patients with a history of trauma or surgery, those with an effusion, those older than 50 years (to rule out osteoarthritis), and those whose pain does not improve with treatment. Recent research has shown that physical therapy is effective in treating PFPS. There is little evidence to support the routine use of knee braces or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Surgery should be considered only after failure of a comprehensive rehabilitation program. Educating patients about modification of risk factors is important in preventing recurrence.     

Grand appareillage orthopédique et révolution numérique

The use of prosthetic devices has advanced over the last decade thanks to the development of new technologies. Here, we present three examples: a myoelectric hand prosthesis, a microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knee and a computer-assisted tool for designing and adjusting braces.     

Knee Braces - an evaluation of treatment effectiveness after reconstruction of anterior crucial ligament

Background Despite extensive research providing significant progress in rehabilitation treatment of the anterior crucial ligament injuries, the problem concerning the choice of the most advantageous protection after reconstruction operation is still to be solved. Material and method Seventy one patients after reconstruction of anterior crucial ligament of the knee were examined objectively and subjectively to evaluate the effectiveness of three types of Rehabilitation Knee Braces in protecting of knee instability. All patients were examined by using Elgon Electrogoniometr to control dislocation of the knee and by using score test. Results Objective goniometric and subjective score tests gives better stability results of knee braces with strong construction. Conclusions In conclusion I affirmed Knee Braces sufficiently secure the knee against displacement in the joint and effectively protect the anterior crucial ligament against traumatic activity, which justifies their application rehabilitation after surgical reconstruction of anterior crucial ligament.     

Electromyographic and biomechanic analysis of anterior cruciate ligament deficiency and functional knee bracing

OBJECTIVE: Examine the neuromuscular response to functional knee bracing relative to anterior tibial translations in vivo. DESIGN: During randomised brace conditions, electromyographic data with simultaneous skeletal tibiofemoral kinematics were recorded from four anterior cruciate ligament deficient subjects to investigate the effect of the DonJoy Legend functional brace during activity. BACKGROUND: Knee braces do not increase knee stability but may influence afferent inputs from proprioception and therefore one might expect changes in muscle firing patterns, amplitude and timing. METHODS: Hoffman bone pins affixed with markers were implanted into the tibia and femur for kinematic measurement. The EMG data from the rectus femoris, semitendinosus, biceps femoris, and lateral head of the gastrocnemius were integrated for each subject in three separate time periods: 250 ms preceding footstrike and two consecutive 125 ms time intervals following footstrike. RESULTS: With brace, semitendinosus activity significantly decreased 17% prior to footstrike whereas bicep femoris significantly decreased 44% during A2, (P<0.05). Rectus femoris activity significantly increased 21% in A2 (P<0.05). No consistent reductions in anterior translations were evident. CONCLUSION: Our preliminary findings, based on a limited number of subjects, indicate joint stability may result from proprioceptive feedback rather than the mechanical stabilising effect of the brace. Despite a significant increase in rectus femoris activity upon landing, only one subject demonstrated an increase in anterior tibial drawer. RELEVANCE: Studies have shown functional braces do not mechanically stabilise the anterior cruciate ligament deficient knee. Perhaps bracing alters proprioceptive feedback. It has been shown that bracing the anterior cruciate ligament deficient knee may affect hamstring and quadriceps activity. Our findings stresses the importance of functional knee bracing combined with proprioceptive and muscular coordination training in order to increase joint stability.     

Einfluss von Gangbildmodifikationen und Orthesen auf die Kniegelenkbelastung bei Kniearthrose

Medial knee osteoarthritis is one of the most common diseases in persons over 55 years of age. Limited mobility and pain impair the activities of daily life. In addition to surgical interventions there are also conservative treatment options that can lead to pain reduction and normalization of load distribution. These include active treatment options, such as modification of gait and muscle strengthening. Modification of the gait pattern can lead to a reduction in the load situation in the knee joint during walking. This reduction in load is detected by a three-dimensional gait analysis during which the load situation in the knee joint can be measured. The primary target parameter is the external adduction moment. Modifications, such as increased lateral trunk sway, increased foot progression angle or increased internal thigh rotation can positively influence the load situation. Passive treatment options, such as knee joint braces or lateral wedge insoles also result in reduction of the external adduction moment. Studies have demonstrated that these measures not only caused a reduction of the moment but also reduced the subjective feeling of pain. Conservative measures can result in a reduction of knee joint loading and thus increase the quality of life.     

关节镜下半月板缝合术后康复计划的设计与临床初步应用

目的：探讨关节镜下半月板缝合术后康复计划的临床应用效果。方法：采用自行研究、设计的半月板缝合术后康复计划，对６０例关节镜下半月板缝合术后患者进行康复训练。采用术后立刻戴支具，术后第一天起按康复计划开始实施术肢康复。术后平均随访４６周。结果：１例老年患者术膝屈曲仅达１００度，１例患者术后５天自行去支具行走，完全负重，症状复发，其余患者症状消失，关节活动度正常，恢复原工作。结论：本康复计划各阶段目的明确，简便有效，结合现代支具的应用，取得了满意的临床效果，值得推广。     

A systematic review of bracing following reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament

Objectives

To determine whether the use of a postoperative knee brace following reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) affects clinical outcomes.

Data sources

The electronic databases AMED, Cinahl, Cochrane database, Embase, Medline (via Ovid), Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) and Pubmed were searched from their inception to August 2006. A manual search of pertinent specialist journals and the reference lists of identified articles was also performed.

Review methods

All English-language, human subject, controlled clinical trials that compared the effects of wearing a knee brace with not wearing a brace for 1 day to 3 months following ACL reconstruction were included. Two reviewers extracted the data independently from the included studies, and assessed the methodological quality of the literature using the PEDro scoring system.

Results

Seven papers comprising of 390 ACL reconstructions were included. There were no significant longer-term differences in outcomes between patients who wore knee braces and those who did not. The methodological assessment of the literature revealed a number of limitations, including not blinding assessors, not performing a power calculation to determine the sample size, and not concealing subject allocation.

Conclusions

There appeared to be no significant longer-term differences in clinical outcomes between patients who wore postoperative knee braces and those who did not. Areas for further study are suggested, most notably to assess this topic using more rigorous randomised controlled trial methodologies.     

Effects of foot orthoses and valgus bracing on the knee adduction moment and medial joint load during gait

BACKGROUND: Lateral shoe wedges and valgus knee braces are designed to decrease the force acting in the medial knee compartment by reducing the external adduction moment applied at the knee. The biomechanical changes introduced by these orthoses can be relatively small. Computer modeling and simulation offers an alternative approach for assessing the biomechanical performance of these devices. METHODS: A three-dimensional model of the lower-limb was used to calculate muscle, ligament, and joint loading at the knee during gait. A lateral shoe wedge was simulated by moving the center of pressure of the ground reaction force up to 5mm laterally. A valgus knee brace was simulated by applying abduction moments of up to 12 Nm at the knee. FINDINGS: Knee adduction moment and medial compartment load decreased linearly with lateral displacement of the center of pressure of the ground reaction force. A 1 mm displacement of the center of pressure decreased the peak knee adduction moment by 2%, while the peak medial compartment load was reduced by 1%. Knee adduction moment and medial compartment force also decreased linearly with valgus moments applied about the knee. A 1 Nm increase in brace moment decreased the peak knee adduction moment by 3%, while the peak medial compartment load was reduced by 1%. INTERPRETATION: Changes in knee joint loading due to lateral shoe wedges and valgus bracing are small and may be difficult to measure by conventional gait analysis methods. The relationships between lateral shift in the center of pressure of the ground force, valgus brace moment, knee adduction moment, and medial joint load can be quantified and explained using computer modeling and simulation. These relationships may serve as a useful guide for evaluating the biomechanical efficacy of a generic wedge insole or knee brace.     

Treatment of knee osteoarthritis

Knee osteoarthritis is a common disabling condition that affects more than one-third of persons older than 65 years. Exercise, weight loss, physical therapy, intra-articular corticosteroid injections, and the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and braces or heel wedges decrease pain and improve function. Acetaminophen, glucosamine, ginger, S-adenosylmethionine (SAM-e), capsaicin cream, topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, acupuncture, and tai chi may offer some benefit. Tramadol has a poor trade-off between risks and benefits and is not routinely recommended. Opioids are being used more often in patients with moderate to severe pain or diminished quality of life, but patients receiving these drugs must be carefully selected and monitored because of the inherent adverse effects. Intra-articular corticosteroid injections are effective, but evidence for injection of hyaluronic acid is mixed. Arthroscopic surgery has been shown to have no benefit in knee osteoarthritis. Total joint arthroplasty of the knee should be considered when conservative symptomatic management is ineffective.     

I-cell disease and its rehabilitation: case study

I-cell disease is a rare inborn error of mucolipid metabolism that is characterized by generalized hypotonia, thick and tight skin, restriction of joint motion, coarse facial features, bony deformities, and an inability to stand or walk. A case was treated with gentle stretching, neurodevelopmental therapy, and strengthening exercises of both hip and knee extensor muscles. After this treatment the patient was able to ambulate with moderate support using bilateral long leg braces.     

The effect of functional knee brace design and hinge misalignment on lower limb joint mechanics

BACKGROUND: Knee bracing has been shown to alter lower limb joint mechanics, which may protect the anterior cruciate ligament. The effect of brace alignment and brace type, however, remains largely unknown. This study was conducted to determine whether the use of a functional knee brace, the type of brace used or its alignment relative to the knee causes biomechanical alterations to gait. METHODS: Ten healthy participants took part in two walking conditions (aligned brace and misaligned brace) for two different types of brace (sleeve brace with bilateral hinges and hinge-post-shell). A non-braced condition was included as a baseline measure. Three-dimensional kinematics and force platform data were used to calculate the joint intersegmental forces and net joint moments of the ankle, knee and hip. FINDINGS: In comparison to non-braced walking, the shell brace in its aligned position significantly reduced the peak ankle plantarflexor moment. There was a decreased peak knee flexion angle with both the aligned shell and sleeve braces. The shell brace in its aligned position significantly increased peak knee adduction and reduced peak knee internal rotation. INTERPRETATION: In this sample of healthy participants, functional knee bracing failed to alter lower limb mechanics in such a way that would reduce the force transmitted to the anterior cruciate ligament. In addition, although there were brace induced changes in lower limb kinematics with 2cm of distal hinge misalignment, it is unlikely that hinge misalignment of this magnitude is detrimental to an uninjured knee joint during walking.