杂交捕获法和PCR-RDB法检测妇女HPV感染的比较

目的探讨HC2法和PCR-RDB法检测妇女HPV感染的异同点。方法利用HC2法和PCR—RDB法检测妇女生殖道HPV感染状况，然后进行比较。结果81．14％（400／493）的样本PCR-RDB法和HC2法检测结果一致，两法一致性检验Kappa值为0．63（95％CI，0．57～0．69）。在HC2法RLU／CO〈1．00、1．00～9．99、10．00～99．99、100．00～999．99和≥1000．00的样本中，PCR—RDB法13种高危型HPV的检出率依次为1．60％（3／187）、29．85％（20／67）、69．88％（58／83）、86．52％（77／89）和91．04％（61／67），五组间比较，差异有统计学意义（Х^2=289．3，P〈0．01）。HC2法高危型HPV试剂可与HPV53、66、11、cp8304等基因型发生交叉反应。结论HC2法和PCR-RDB法具有较好的一致性，HC2法存在交叉反应现象，PCR-RDB法难以标准化。     

杂交捕获法和PCR-RDB法检测妇女HPV感染的比较

Objective To compare hybrid capture-Ⅱ(HC2)to polymerase chain reaction(PCR)-reverse dot-blot(RDB)for detecting HPV infection in women.Methods HC2 method and PCR-RDB were applied to detecting human papillomaviral infection in female genital duct,and the test results were analyzed.Results Concordant results were found in 81.14%(400/493)samples(Kappa=0.63;95%CI,0.57-0.69).The high risk type HPV positive rate detected by PCR-RDB were 1.60%(3/187),29.85%(20/67),69.88%(58/83),86.52%(77/89)and 91.04%(61/67),respectively,when the HC2 RLU/CO of samples were＜1.00,1.00-9.99,10.00-99.99,100.00-999.99 and≥1000.00.Statistical differences were found among the five groups(χ2=289.3,P＜0.01).Cross reactions were found between HC2 high risk probe and HPV53,66,11,cp8304 and other genotypes.Conclusion There is good concordance between HC2 and PCR-RDB,though cross reaction exists in HC2.Relatively speaking,there are more influential factors for PCR-RDB.     

杂交捕获法和PCR-RDB法检测妇女HPV感染的比较

Objective To compare hybrid capture-Ⅱ(HC2)to polymerase chain reaction(PCR)-reverse dot-blot(RDB)for detecting HPV infection in women.Methods HC2 method and PCR-RDB were applied to detecting human papillomaviral infection in female genital duct,and the test results were analyzed.Results Concordant results were found in 81.14%(400/493)samples(Kappa=0.63;95%CI,0.57-0.69).The high risk type HPV positive rate detected by PCR-RDB were 1.60%(3/187),29.85%(20/67),69.88%(58/83),86.52%(77/89)and 91.04%(61/67),respectively,when the HC2 RLU/CO of samples were＜1.00,1.00-9.99,10.00-99.99,100.00-999.99 and≥1000.00.Statistical differences were found among the five groups(χ2=289.3,P＜0.01).Cross reactions were found between HC2 high risk probe and HPV53,66,11,cp8304 and other genotypes.Conclusion There is good concordance between HC2 and PCR-RDB,though cross reaction exists in HC2.Relatively speaking,there are more influential factors for PCR-RDB.     

杂交捕获法和PCR-RDB法检测妇女HPV感染的比较

Objective To compare hybrid capture-Ⅱ(HC2)to polymerase chain reaction(PCR)-reverse dot-blot(RDB)for detecting HPV infection in women.Methods HC2 method and PCR-RDB were applied to detecting human papillomaviral infection in female genital duct,and the test results were analyzed.Results Concordant results were found in 81.14%(400/493)samples(Kappa=0.63;95%CI,0.57-0.69).The high risk type HPV positive rate detected by PCR-RDB were 1.60%(3/187),29.85%(20/67),69.88%(58/83),86.52%(77/89)and 91.04%(61/67),respectively,when the HC2 RLU/CO of samples were＜1.00,1.00-9.99,10.00-99.99,100.00-999.99 and≥1000.00.Statistical differences were found among the five groups(χ2=289.3,P＜0.01).Cross reactions were found between HC2 high risk probe and HPV53,66,11,cp8304 and other genotypes.Conclusion There is good concordance between HC2 and PCR-RDB,though cross reaction exists in HC2.Relatively speaking,there are more influential factors for PCR-RDB.     

杂交捕获法和PCR-RDB法检测妇女HPV感染的比较

Objective To compare hybrid capture-Ⅱ(HC2)to polymerase chain reaction(PCR)-reverse dot-blot(RDB)for detecting HPV infection in women.Methods HC2 method and PCR-RDB were applied to detecting human papillomaviral infection in female genital duct,and the test results were analyzed.Results Concordant results were found in 81.14%(400/493)samples(Kappa=0.63;95%CI,0.57-0.69).The high risk type HPV positive rate detected by PCR-RDB were 1.60%(3/187),29.85%(20/67),69.88%(58/83),86.52%(77/89)and 91.04%(61/67),respectively,when the HC2 RLU/CO of samples were＜1.00,1.00-9.99,10.00-99.99,100.00-999.99 and≥1000.00.Statistical differences were found among the five groups(χ2=289.3,P＜0.01).Cross reactions were found between HC2 high risk probe and HPV53,66,11,cp8304 and other genotypes.Conclusion There is good concordance between HC2 and PCR-RDB,though cross reaction exists in HC2.Relatively speaking,there are more influential factors for PCR-RDB.     

杂交捕获法和PCR-RDB法检测妇女HPV感染的比较

Objective To compare hybrid capture-Ⅱ(HC2)to polymerase chain reaction(PCR)-reverse dot-blot(RDB)for detecting HPV infection in women.Methods HC2 method and PCR-RDB were applied to detecting human papillomaviral infection in female genital duct,and the test results were analyzed.Results Concordant results were found in 81.14%(400/493)samples(Kappa=0.63;95%CI,0.57-0.69).The high risk type HPV positive rate detected by PCR-RDB were 1.60%(3/187),29.85%(20/67),69.88%(58/83),86.52%(77/89)and 91.04%(61/67),respectively,when the HC2 RLU/CO of samples were＜1.00,1.00-9.99,10.00-99.99,100.00-999.99 and≥1000.00.Statistical differences were found among the five groups(χ2=289.3,P＜0.01).Cross reactions were found between HC2 high risk probe and HPV53,66,11,cp8304 and other genotypes.Conclusion There is good concordance between HC2 and PCR-RDB,though cross reaction exists in HC2.Relatively speaking,there are more influential factors for PCR-RDB.     

杂交捕获法和PCR-RDB法检测妇女HPV感染的比较

Objective To compare hybrid capture-Ⅱ(HC2)to polymerase chain reaction(PCR)-reverse dot-blot(RDB)for detecting HPV infection in women.Methods HC2 method and PCR-RDB were applied to detecting human papillomaviral infection in female genital duct,and the test results were analyzed.Results Concordant results were found in 81.14%(400/493)samples(Kappa=0.63;95%CI,0.57-0.69).The high risk type HPV positive rate detected by PCR-RDB were 1.60%(3/187),29.85%(20/67),69.88%(58/83),86.52%(77/89)and 91.04%(61/67),respectively,when the HC2 RLU/CO of samples were＜1.00,1.00-9.99,10.00-99.99,100.00-999.99 and≥1000.00.Statistical differences were found among the five groups(χ2=289.3,P＜0.01).Cross reactions were found between HC2 high risk probe and HPV53,66,11,cp8304 and other genotypes.Conclusion There is good concordance between HC2 and PCR-RDB,though cross reaction exists in HC2.Relatively speaking,there are more influential factors for PCR-RDB.     

杂交捕获法和PCR-RDB法检测妇女HPV感染的比较

Objective To compare hybrid capture-Ⅱ(HC2)to polymerase chain reaction(PCR)-reverse dot-blot(RDB)for detecting HPV infection in women.Methods HC2 method and PCR-RDB were applied to detecting human papillomaviral infection in female genital duct,and the test results were analyzed.Results Concordant results were found in 81.14%(400/493)samples(Kappa=0.63;95%CI,0.57-0.69).The high risk type HPV positive rate detected by PCR-RDB were 1.60%(3/187),29.85%(20/67),69.88%(58/83),86.52%(77/89)and 91.04%(61/67),respectively,when the HC2 RLU/CO of samples were＜1.00,1.00-9.99,10.00-99.99,100.00-999.99 and≥1000.00.Statistical differences were found among the five groups(χ2=289.3,P＜0.01).Cross reactions were found between HC2 high risk probe and HPV53,66,11,cp8304 and other genotypes.Conclusion There is good concordance between HC2 and PCR-RDB,though cross reaction exists in HC2.Relatively speaking,there are more influential factors for PCR-RDB.     

杂交捕获法和PCR-RDB法检测妇女HPV感染的比较

Objective To compare hybrid capture-Ⅱ(HC2)to polymerase chain reaction(PCR)-reverse dot-blot(RDB)for detecting HPV infection in women.Methods HC2 method and PCR-RDB were applied to detecting human papillomaviral infection in female genital duct,and the test results were analyzed.Results Concordant results were found in 81.14%(400/493)samples(Kappa=0.63;95%CI,0.57-0.69).The high risk type HPV positive rate detected by PCR-RDB were 1.60%(3/187),29.85%(20/67),69.88%(58/83),86.52%(77/89)and 91.04%(61/67),respectively,when the HC2 RLU/CO of samples were＜1.00,1.00-9.99,10.00-99.99,100.00-999.99 and≥1000.00.Statistical differences were found among the five groups(χ2=289.3,P＜0.01).Cross reactions were found between HC2 high risk probe and HPV53,66,11,cp8304 and other genotypes.Conclusion There is good concordance between HC2 and PCR-RDB,though cross reaction exists in HC2.Relatively speaking,there are more influential factors for PCR-RDB.     

杂交捕获法和PCR-RDB法检测妇女HPV感染的比较

Objective To compare hybrid capture-Ⅱ(HC2)to polymerase chain reaction(PCR)-reverse dot-blot(RDB)for detecting HPV infection in women.Methods HC2 method and PCR-RDB were applied to detecting human papillomaviral infection in female genital duct,and the test results were analyzed.Results Concordant results were found in 81.14%(400/493)samples(Kappa=0.63;95%CI,0.57-0.69).The high risk type HPV positive rate detected by PCR-RDB were 1.60%(3/187),29.85%(20/67),69.88%(58/83),86.52%(77/89)and 91.04%(61/67),respectively,when the HC2 RLU/CO of samples were＜1.00,1.00-9.99,10.00-99.99,100.00-999.99 and≥1000.00.Statistical differences were found among the five groups(χ2=289.3,P＜0.01).Cross reactions were found between HC2 high risk probe and HPV53,66,11,cp8304 and other genotypes.Conclusion There is good concordance between HC2 and PCR-RDB,though cross reaction exists in HC2.Relatively speaking,there are more influential factors for PCR-RDB.