Allogeneic blood progenitor cell collection in normal donors after mobilization with filgrastim: the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center experience

BACKGROUND: Information on the safety and efficacy of allogeneic peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) collection in filgrastim-mobilized normal donors is still limited. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The PBPC donor database from a 42-month period (12/94-5/98) was reviewed for apheresis and clinical data related to PBPC donation. Normal PBPC donors received filgrastim (6 microg/kg subcutaneously every 12 hours) for 3 to 4 days and subsequently underwent daily leukapheresis. The target collection was > or =4 x 10(6)CD34+ cells per kg of recipient's body weight. RESULTS: A total of 350 donors were found to be evaluable. Their median age was 41 years (range, 4-79). Their median preapheresis white cell count was 42.8 x 10(9) per L (range, 18.3-91.6). Of these donors, 17 (5%) had inadequate peripheral venous access. Leukapheresis could not be completed because of apheresis-related adverse events in 2 donors (0.5%). Of the 324 donors evaluable for apheresis yield data, 221 (68%) reached the collection target with one leukapheresis. The median CD34+ cell dose collected (first leukapheresis) was 462 x 10(6) (range, 29-1463).The main adverse events related to filgrastim administration in donors evaluable for toxicity (n = 341) were bone pain (84%), headache (54%), fatigue (31%), and nausea (13%). These events were rated as moderate to severe (grade 2-3) by 171 (50%) of the donors. In 2 donors (0.5%), they prompted the discontinuation of filgrastim administration. CONCLUSION: PBPC apheresis for allogeneic transplantation is safe and well tolerated. It allows the collection of an "acceptable" PBPC dose in most normal donors with one leukapheresis, with minimal need for invasive procedures.     

Kinetics of PBPC mobilization by cyclophosphamide, as compared with that by epirubicin/paclitaxel followed by G-CSF support: implications for optimal timing of PBPC harvest

BACKGROUND: Limited information is available on the mobilization kinetics of autologous PBPCs after induction with various chemotherapy regimens. With PBPC mobilization in patients with breast cancer used as a model for chemotherapy-induced PBPC recruitment, the kinetics of progenitor cells mobilized either with cyclophosphamide (CY) or epirubicin/paclitaxel (EPI-TAX) followed by the administration of G-CSF was compared. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The study included a total of 86 patients with breast cancer (stage II-IV) receiving either CY (n = 39) or EPI-TAX (n = 47), both followed by G-CSF support. The progenitor cell content in peripheral blood and apheresis components was monitored by flow cytometric enumeration of CD34+ cells. PBPC collection was started when the threshold of >20 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per L of peripheral blood was reached. RESULTS: The PBPC collection was begun a median of 9 days after the administration of EPI-TAX followed by G-CSF support, as compared to a median of 13 days after mobilization with CY plus G-CSF. After treatment with CY, the total numbers of PBPCs peaked on Day 1 of apheresis, and they rapidly declined thereafter. In contrast, treatment with EPI-TAX followed by G-CSF administration led to a steady mobilization of CD34+ cells during leukapheresis. The difference in the mobilization patterns with CY and EPI-TAX resulted in a greater yield of CD34+ cells per L of processed blood volume. Compared to EPI-TAX, mobilization with CY required the overall processing of 30 percent less whole-blood volume to reach the target yield of > or = 10 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg of body weight. After a median of three apheresis procedures, however, both CY+G-CSF and EPI-TAX+G-CSF were equally effective in obtaining this target yield. CONCLUSION: These results imply that specific PBPC mobilization as part of a given chemotherapy regimen should be taken into consideration before the planning of a PBPC harvest.     

The predictive value of white cell or CD34+ cell count in the peripheral blood for timing apheresis and maximizing yield

BACKGROUND: The collection of peripheral blood stem and progenitor cells (PBPCs) for transplantation can be time-consuming and expensive. Thus, the utility of counting CD34+ cells and white cells (WBCs) in the peripheral blood was evaluated as a predictor of CD34+ cell yield in the apheresis component. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The WBC and CD34+ cell counts in the peripheral blood and the apheresis components from 216 collections were assessed. Sixty-three patients underwent mobilization with chemotherapy plus filgrastim, and 17 patients and 14 allogeneic PBPC donors did so with filgrastim alone. The relationship between the number of WBC and CD34+ cells in the peripheral blood and in the apheresis component was analyzed by using rank correlation and linear regression analysis. RESULTS: The correlation coefficient for CD34+ cells per liter of peripheral blood with CD34+ cell yield (x 10(6)/kg) was 0.87 (n = 216 collections). This correlation existed for many patient and collection variables. However, patients with acute myeloid leukemia had fewer CD34+ cells in the apheresis component at any level of peripheral blood CD34+ cell count. Components collected from patients with CD34+ cell counts below 10 x 10(6) per L in the peripheral blood contained a median of 0.75 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg. When the WBC count in the blood was below 5.0 x 10(9) per L, the median number of CD34+ cells in the peripheral blood was 5.6 x 10(6) per L (range, 1.0-15.5 x 10(6)/L). A very poor correlation was found between the WBC count in the blood and the CD34+ cell yield (p = 0.12, n = 158 collections). CONCLUSION: The number of CD34+ cells, but not WBCs, in the peripheral blood can be used as a predictor for timing of apheresis and estimating PBPC yield. This is a robust relationship not affected by a variety of patient and collection factors except the diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia. Patients who undergo mobilization with chemotherapy and filgrastim also should undergo monitoring of peripheral blood CD34+ cell counts, beginning when the WBC count in the blood exceeds 1.0 to 5.0 x 10(9) per L.     

Leukapheresis after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation: a novel approach to harvest a second autograft

BACKGROUND: Autologous peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) are usually collected after the administration of conventional-dose chemotherapy (CDCT) and growth factors. However, there are no data available concerning the collection of PBPCs after high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) and autologous hematopoietic transplantation in a larger series. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Patients (n = 30) underwent leukapheresis for PBPC harvest after CDCT. After HDCT and autografting, the collection of a second PBPC autograft was attempted. RESULTS: Leukapheresis was performed after CDCT in all cases at a median of 118 CD34+ cells per microL (range, 18-589) and resulted in 6.4 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg (range, 1.7-29.0). After HDCT and autografting, 24 patients (80%) underwent secondary leukapheresis, although they had a significantly lower median of peripheral blood (PB) CD34+ cells (30/microL; range, 10-171; p < 0.001). In these patients a median of 3.6 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg (range, 1.6-10.1) was collected in the post-transplantation course. In the remaining six patients (20%) with PB CD34+ cells < 10 per microL, no PBPC harvesting was performed. These so-called poor mobilizers had received significantly less CD34+ cells for autologous transplantation than patients with successful post-HDCT mobilization (median, 2.5 x 10(6)/kg [range, 1.7-3.0] vs. 6.5 x 10(6)/kg [range, 3.2-19.6]; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Collection of PBPCs is possible in most patients during the recovery phase of hematopoiesis after HDCT plus autografting, and the number of circulating PBPCs may be related to the CD34+ cell dose transfused by the preceding autograft.     

A prospective, randomized, sequential, crossover trial of large-volume versus normal-volume leukapheresis procedures: effect on progenitor cells and engraftment

BACKGROUND: The influence of leukapheresis size on the number of harvested peripheral blood progenitor cells is still unclear. A prospective randomized crossover trial was thus performed, to evaluate the effect of large-volume leukapheresis (LVL) versus normal-volume leukapheresis (NVL) on progenitor cells and engraftment in 26 patients with breast cancer and 15 patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma who were eligible for peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to undergo either LVL on Day 1 and on Day 2 or vice versa. The number of progenitor cells was evaluated in the harvest and before and after leukapheresis in the peripheral blood. RESULTS: The number of harvested CD34+ cells (4.8 x 10(6) vs. 3.4 x 10(6)/kg body weight, p < 0.001) and colony-forming units-granulocyte-macrophage (3.1 x 10(5) vs. 2.4 x 10(5)/kg body weight, p = 0.0026) was significantly higher for LVL procedures than for NVL procedures. The median extraction efficacy, defined as the difference between the yield in the harvest and the decrease in the total number of CD34+ cells in peripheral blood during leukapheresis, was significantly (p < 0.0001) higher for LVL than for NVL (2.6 x 10(8) and 8 x 10(7), respectively). In patients with breast cancer, the median amount of CD34+ cells in the harvest and the median extraction efficacy were higher for LVL than for NVL (p < 0.0001). This was not found for patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. CONCLUSION: LVL results in a higher yield of CD34+ cells and colony-forming units-granulocyte-macrophage than NVL, but only in patients with breast cancer and with high numbers of CD34+ cells in the peripheral blood before leukapheresis.     

The timing of granulocyte–colony-stimulating factor administration after chemotherapy does not affect stem and progenitor cell apheresis yield: a retrospective study of 65 cases

BACKGROUND: The optimal time for postchemotherapy granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) administration before peripheral blood stem and progenitor cell (PBPC) collection is not well defined. The impact of G-CSF scheduling on the number of CD34+ cells collected by leukapheresis from 65 patients with malignant disease was studied retrospectively. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Chemotherapy was performed on Days 1 and 2 and was followed by G-CSF to mobilize PBPCs. In Group 1, 30 patients received the first dose of G-CSF immediately after the end of chemotherapy, as commonly recommended. In Group 2, 35 patients received the first G-CSF dose after the end of chemotherapy (Days 7 or 8). RESULTS: No difference was observed between the two groups in white cell recovery and the median number of CD34+ cells harvested. The number of leukapheresis procedures necessary to obtain the minimal number of 3 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg was the same. The proportion of patients with a failure of PBPC collection was similar, and G-CSF consumption was reduced in Group 2 without increasing infectious risks. CONCLUSION: Early administration of G-CSF after chemotherapy appears not to be a prerequisite for satisfactory PBPC collection. This approach could allow significant savings in terms of medical cost. A randomized and prospective study would be necessary, however, to assess the validity of these conclusions.     

重组人G-CSF对健康供者外周造血干／祖细胞动员和采集效果的影响因素分析

应用重组人粒系集落刺激因子（rhG—CSF）对健康供者进行动员并采集造血干细胞用于异基因外周血造血干细胞移植已在临床广泛应用，本研究通过对影响外周干细胞动员和采集效果的多因素分析，进一步探讨最佳动员方案及采集时机。采取回顾性方法分析了431例健康供者外周血干细胞动员采集效果，并进一步分析了供者一般特征、rhG—CSF动员天数、每日皮下注射次数、剂量与采集效果的关系。结果表明：rhG—CSF在动员中平均应用剂量为5．7μg／（kg·d），平均采集1．7次，收获单个核细胞数平均为9．57×10^8／kg，CD34^＋细胞平均为4．91×10^6／kg。绝大多数供者不良反应轻微。多因素分析结果显示，采集效率主要与供者体重指数，采集天数相关。rhG—CSF动员第5天采集的供者，其MNC数、CD34^＋细胞数及第一次单采成功率均优于其他时间采集的供者。同时，本组供者应用rhG—CSF剂量较小且剂量范围较窄，rhG—CSF剂量不如采集时间对采集物质量的影响明显。结论：小剂量应用rhG—CSF动员并于第5天开始采集是健康供者造血干细胞动员的较理想方案。     

Harvesting peripheral blood progenitor cells from healthy donors with a short course of recombinant human granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor

A short-course administration of non-glycosylated granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) was investigated in 68 healthy donors (HDs) in order to collect > or = 4 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kilogram of recipient's body weight. G-CSF was given at 10 microg/kg per day administered in two divided doses for 3 days. Leukapheresis was scheduled on day 4, 12 h after the last dose of G-CSF. A median of 35.6 circulating CD34+ cells microL(-1) (range, 3.1-185) was found on the day of leukapheresis. This allowed a median collection of CD34+ cells of 4.2 x 10(6) per kilogram of recipient's weight (range, 1.0-17.4). One single procedure was sufficient to reach the target level of CD34+ cells in 36 (53%) of 68 donors; significant correlations were found between the number of CD34+ cells collected on day 4 and the patient's sex, body-weight and volume of blood processed. A retrospective analysis was made with a historical group of HDs collected on day 5. The day 5 schedule allowed a more consistent achievement of the target cell dose with one leukapheresis (P = 0.005) and resulted in the initial collection of a significantly larger number of CD34+ cells (P = 0.006).     

Inverse relationship between patient peripheral blood CD34+ cell counts and collection efficiency for CD34+ cells in two automated leukapheresis systems

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to analyze the CD34 cell collection efficiency (CE) of automated leukapheresis protocols of two blood cell separators (Spectra, COBE [AutoPBSC protocol] and AS104, Fresenius [PBSC-Lym, protocol]) for peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) harvest in patients with malignant diseases. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: PBPCs were collected by the Spectra AutoPBSC protocol in 95 patients (123 collections) and the AS104 PBSC-Lym protocol in 87 patients (115 harvests). Patients underwent a median of one (range, 1-4) conventional-volume apheresis procedure of 10.8 L (9.0-13.9) to obtain a target cell dose of > or =2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg. RESULTS: The median overall CD34 CE was significantly better on the AS104 than on the Spectra: 55.8 percent versus 42.4 percent (p = 0.000). This was also true below (59.2% vs. 50.1%; p = 0.022) and above (51.2% vs. 41.3%; p = 0.001) the preleukapheresis threshold of 40 CD34+ cells per microL needed to collect a single-apheresis autograft. However, at > or =40 circulating CD34+ cells per microL, both cell separators achieved the target of > or =2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg. The CD34 CE dropped significantly, from 59.2 percent at <40 cells per microL to 51.2 percent at > or =40 cells per microL on the AS104 (p = 0.017) and from 50.1 percent to 41.3 percent on the Spectra (p = 0.033). CONCLUSION: Whereas the CD34 CE was significantly different with the AS104 and the Spectra, the CD34 CE of both machines correlated inversely with peripheral blood CD34+ cell counts, showing a significant decline with increasing numbers of circulating CD34+ cells. Nevertheless, at > or 40 preapheresis CD34+ cells per microL, sufficient hematopoietic autografts of > or =2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg were harvested by a single conventional-volume (11 L) leukapheresis on both cell separators.     

DCEP chemotherapy followed by a single, fixed dose of pegylated filgrastim allows adequate stem cell mobilization in multiple myeloma patients

BACKGROUND: Pegylated filgrastim (PEG-f), a long-lasting granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor, has been used in different hematologic conditions to shorten chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and to mobilize peripheral blood stem cells. Data on mobilization efficacy in patients with multiple myeloma are, however, still limited. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The feasibility and mobilizing capacity of DCEP chemotherapy followed by a single subcutaneous dose of 6 mg of PEG-f in 23 myeloma patients (11 females and 12 males) whose median age was 55 years (range, 31-67 years) were investigated. RESULTS: The median number of CD34+ cells collected was 5.72 x 10(6) per kg body weight with a range between 0 x 10(6) and 29.4 x 10(6) per kg body weight. Twenty patients (87%) yielded more than 2 x 10(6) per kg body weight CD34+ cells. Among the 22 patients who mobilized some CD34+ cells, 27 leukapheresis procedures were carried out (a single leukapheresis procedure in 17 patients and 2 leukapheresis procedures in 5). The median interval between the start of chemotherapy and the first leukapheresis procedure was 12 days (range, 11-16 days). With regard to tolerability, 7 patients complained of mild to moderate back pain, controlled with oral analgesics. No patient was hospitalized, and no fever or infections occurred. CONCLUSION: These results, compared with those previously reported for the DCEP-filgrastim combination, suggest that DCEP chemotherapy followed by PEG-f is a promising combination to mobilize peripheral blood stem cells in myeloma patients.     

Second donation of granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor-mobilized peripheral blood progenitor cells: risk factors associated with a low yield of CD34+ cells

BACKGROUND: There are still limited data on the efficacy and safety of repeated donations of granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)-mobilized peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) for allogeneic transplantation. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Sixty-seven healthy donors undergoing two consecutive mobilizations of PBPCs within a median interval of 5 months (range, 0.1-47 months) were investigated. For both first mobilization (FM) and second mobilization (SM), G-CSF (lenograstim) at 7.5 microg per kg per day was administered. RESULTS: The nonhematologic side effects were comparable between both mobilizations. A significantly lower yield of CD34+ cells x 10(6) per kg of donor weight was obtained on Day 5 of SM in female (n = 31; FM, 5.0; SM, 3.23; p = 0.008) but not in male (n = 36; FM, 5.96; SM, 5.36; p = 0.24) donors. Multivariate analysis identified a lower CD34+ blood concentration on Day 5 of FM (p < 0.001) as well as female sex (p = 0.015) as independent risk factors for a lower yield of progenitor cells, whereas donor age and body mass index, interval between donations, and schedule of G-CSF application showed no significant impact. CONCLUSION: The identified risk factors allow the estimation of the efficacy of a SM in an individual donor before G-CSF administration, thus avoiding distress to both the donor and the recipient.     

Large-volume leukapheresis using femoral venous access for harvesting peripheral blood stem cells with the Fenwal CS 3000 Plus from normal healthy donors: predictors of CD34+ cell yield and collection efficiency

The current paper reports on the predicting factors associated with satisfactory peripheral blood stem cell collection and the efficacy of large-volume leukapheresis (LVL) using femoral vein catheterization to harvest PBSCs with Fenwal CS 3000 Plus from normal healthy donors for allogeneic transplantation. A total of 113 apheresis procedures in 57 patients were performed. The median number of MNCs, CD3+ cells, and CD34+ cells harvested per apheresis was 5.3 x 10(8)/kg (range, 0.3-11.0 x 10(8)/kg), 3.0 x 10(8)/kg (range, 0.2-6.6 x 10(8)/kg), and 7.9 x 10(6)/kg (range, 0.1-188.9 x 10(6)/kg), respectively. The median collection efficiency of MNCs and CD34+ cells was 49.8% and 49.7%, respectively. A highly significant correlation was found between the collected CD34+ cell counts and the pre-apheresis WBC counts in the donors (P = 0.013), and between the collected CD34+ cell counts and the pre-apheresis peripheral blood (PB) CD34+ cell counts (P<0.001). Harvesting at least >4 x 10(6)/kg CD34+ cells from the 1st LVL was achieved in 44 (77.2%) out of 57 donors and in 19 (90.5%) out of 21 donors with a PB-CD34+ cell count of >40/microl. There was no significant difference in the harvested MNC and CD34+ cell counts between the 1st and 2nd apheresis. The catheter-related complications included catheter obstruction (n = 2) and hematoma at the insertion site (n = 3). Accordingly, LVL using femoral venous access for allogeneic PBSC collection from normal healthy donors would appear to be safe and effective.     

Harvesting of CD34 antigen-expressing cells with a new programme for the collection of mononuclear cells with use of the Amicus (Baxter) blood cell separator

A study was performed to evaluate a new programme for peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collection with the use of the Amicus (Baxter) blood cell separator. Healthy donors (n = 9) and oncology patients (n = 21) scheduled for PBSC transplant were studied. Ten PBSC harvests were performed in the donors and 30 in the patients. A median of 6.37 x 106 CD34+ cells per kg recipient body weight (range 3.08-11.06 x 106) were collected from the donors in a product weight of 169.5 g (118-186). From the patients, 6.26 x 106 CD34+ cells per kg body weight (range 0.2-53.6 x 106) were harvested in a product weighing 121.5 g (range 92-190). The median platelet contamination was 0.93 x 1011 (range 0.45-1.23 x 1011) per donor product and 0.2 x 1011 (range 0.05-0.86 x 1011) per patient product. No severe side effects were observed during or after the PBSC collection procedures.     

Collection of peripheral blood progenitor cells with an automated leukapheresis system

BACKGROUND: Apheresis devices designed for the collection of mature blood elements are being used for the collection of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs).The collection of PBPCs differs from that of other cells in the rarity of the target cell and in the fact that donors may undergo several days of collection. A consequence of this process may be a depletion of blood cells such as platelets from the blood. The disposable set and operating software for an apheresis device (Spectra, COBE BCT) was modified by the manufacturer to automate the collection of PBPCs and reduce the collection of unwanted blood cells. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A study was initiated to compare the collection of PBPCs with the new device, the AutoPBSC (version [V]6.0 with AutoPBSC tubing set), and that with the MNC (mononuclear cell) procedure (V4.7 with white cell tubing set), for patients and healthy donors. RESULTS: Patients whose blood was processed by either theV6.0 orV4.7 procedure achieved the target dose of 5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg of patient weight in similar numbers of procedures, even though the calculated collection efficiency for CD34+ cells using the automated V6.0 procedure was significantly less than that with the V4.7 procedure for both allogeneic donors and patients donating PBPCs. The collection efficiency for platelets was lower with the V6.0 procedure, and components collected in this manner contained fewer platelets. Apheresis by the V6.0 procedure required 30 to 60 more minutes per procedure than apheresis by the V4.7 procedure. Review of engraftment kinetics after transplantation did not reveal any effect of the collection procedure on recipients of either allogeneic or autologous transplants. CONCLUSION: The collection efficiencies of the V6.0 procedure for both CD34+ cells and mature blood cells are lower than those of the V4.7 procedure.The lower collection efficiency for platelets results in a smaller drop in peripheral blood platelet count after the procedure.The automated features of the V6.0 procedure may simplify PBPC collection, but this procedure requires a longer apheresis.     

Immune reconstitution after autologous selected peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation: comparison of two CD34+ cell-selection systems

BACKGROUND: Selection of CD34+ PBPCs has been applied as a method of reducing graft contamination from neoplastic cells. This procedure seems to delay lymphocyte recovery, while myeloid engraftment is no different from that with unselected PBPC transplants. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Lymphocyte recovery was studied in two groups of patients who underwent autologous CD34+ PBPC transplant with two different technologies (Ceprate SC, Cellpro [n = 17]; CliniMACS, Miltenyi Biotech [n = 13]). The median number of CD34+ cells transfused was 3.88 x 10(6) per kg and 3.32 x 10(6) per kg, respectively. Residual CD3 cells x 10(6) per kg were 4.97 and 0.58, respectively (p = 0.041). Residual CD19 cells x 10(6) per kg were 1.33 and 0.73, respectively (NS). RESULTS: No differences were found between the two groups in total lymphocyte recovery to >0.5 x 10(9) per L, which achieved a stable count by Day 30. During the study period, the CD4+ cell count remained below 0.2 x 10(9) per L, and the B-cell subset showed a trend toward normalization. CD3/HLA-DR+ and CD16/56 increased markedly in both groups by Day 30. An increase in CMV (13%) and adenovirus (17.4%) infection was found in both groups. CONCLUSION: Both CD34+ cell selection technologies used here determined an excellent CD34+ cell purity and an optimal depletion of T cells. The high rate of viral complications is probably due to the inability of residual T cells left from the CD34+ cell selection to generate, immediately after transplant, an adequate number of virus-specific lymphocytes.     

Successful mobilization of peripheral blood HPCs with G-CSF alone in patients failing to achieve sufficient numbers of CD34+ cells and/or CFU-GM with chemotherapy and G-CSF

BACKGROUND: Mobilization with chemotherapy and G-CSF may result in poor peripheral blood HPC collection, yielding <2 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg or <10 x 10(4) CFU-GM per kg in leukapheresis procedures. The best mobilization strategy for oncology patients remains unclear. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In 27 patients who met either the CD34 (n = 3) or CFU-GM (n = 2) criteria or both (n = 22), the results obtained with two successive strategies-that is, chemotherapy and G-CSF at 10 microg per kg (Group 1, n = 7) and G-CSF at 10 microg per kg alone (Group 2, n = 20) used for a second mobilization course-were retrospectively analyzed. The patients had non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (5), Hodgkin's disease (3), multiple myeloma (5), chronic myeloid leukemia (1), acute myeloid leukemia (1), breast cancer (6), or other solid tumors (6). Previous therapy consisted of 10 (1-31) cycles of chemotherapy with additional chlorambucil (n = 3), interferon (n = 3), and radiotherapy (n = 7). RESULTS: The second collection was undertaken a median of 35 days after the first one. In Group 1, the results of the two mobilizations were identical. In Group 2, the number of CD34+ cells per kg per apheresis (0.17 [0.02-0.45] vs. 0.44 [0.11-0.45], p = 0. 00002), as well as the number of CFU-GM (0.88 [0.00-13.37] vs. 4.19 [0.96-21.61], p = 0.00003), BFU-E (0.83 [0.00-12.72] vs. 8.81 [1. 38-32.51], p = 0.00001), and CFU-MIX (0.10 [0.00-1.70] vs. 0.56 [0. 00-2.64], p = 0.001134) were significantly higher in the second peripheral blood HPC collection. However, yields per apheresis during the second collection did not significantly differ in the two groups. Six patients in Group 1 and 18 in Group 2 underwent transplantation, and all but one achieved engraftment, with a median of 15 versus 12 days to 1,000 neutrophils (NS), 22 versus 16 days to 1 percent reticulocytes (NS), and 26 versus 26 days to 20,000 platelets (NS), respectively. However, platelet engraftment was particularly delayed in many patients. CONCLUSION: G-CSF at 10 microg per kg alone may constitute a valid alternative to chemotherapy and G-CSF to obtain adequate numbers of peripheral blood HPCs in patients who previously failed to achieve mobilization with chemotherapy and G-CSF. This strategy should be tested in prospective randomized trials.     

Preterm birth and the availability of cord blood for HPC transplantation

BACKGROUND: Cord blood from deliveries at term can be used for HPC transplantation. The objective of this study was to determine the amounts of cord blood nucleated cells (NCs) and HPCs that were collectable from preterm deliveries. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Cord blood collected from preterm deliveries between 22 and 36 weeks of gestation was compared with regard to volume, NC count (/mL), CD34+ cell count (/mL), and the NC and CD34+ cell counts per cord blood sample and at different gestational ages. RESULTS: A correlation was found between gestational age and NC count (r = 0.52, p<0.001), and an inverse relation was found between gestational age and CD34+ cell count (r = - 0.68, p<0.001). The CD34+ cell count per cord blood sample was independent of gestational age (r = - 0.13, p = NS), and no significant difference between early (22-32 week) and late (33-36 week) preterm deliveries was found (p = 0.870). Comparison with published data from cord blood transplantations revealed that up to one-third of preterm samples contained at least as many NCs (or CD34+ cells) as the median cell dose transplanted (calculated for the median recipient weight) in the respective study. Furthermore, 77 percent of all preterm samples contained at least 1 x 10(7) NCs (and 42% at least 1 x 10(5) CD34+ cells) per kg for transplantation in a recipient of 20-kg body weight, which corresponds to the lower threshold of cells per kg in the graft recommended by Eurocord. CONCLUSION: Preterm delivery should not be a reason to exclude cord blood collection if allogeneic cord blood transplantation in a sibling is planned.     

Donor age-related differences in PBPC mobilization with rHuG-CSF

BACKGROUND: Data on the administration of rHuG-CSF to normal donors <18 years old are very limited. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The results of rHuG-CSF administration to 61 donors <18 years old (Group A) were retrospectively evaluated and compared with results from 353 donors > or = 18 years old (Group B) who are included in the Spanish National Donor Registry. The mean age (range) in Group A and B was 14 (1-17) and 38 (18-71) years, respectively (p<0.001). The mean dose of rHuG-CSF was 10 microg per kg per day (range, 9-16) during a mean of 5 days (range, 4-6). Central venous access was placed more frequently in younger donors (25% vs. 6%; p<0.001). RESULTS: The mean number of CD34+ cells collected was 7.6 and 6.9 x 10(6) per kg of donor's body weight in Group A and B, respectively. Fifty-six percent of Group A donors needed only one apheresis to achieve > or = 4 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg versus 39 percent of Group B donors (p = 0.01). Side effects were more common in Group B (71% vs. 41%; p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The administration of rHuG-CSF to donors <18 years old leads to CD34+ cell mobilization in a pattern similar to that observed in adults. Greater age was associated with a more frequent requirement for more than one apheresis to achieve a similar number of CD34+ cells.     

Isolation of CD34+ progenitor cells from peripheral blood by use of an automated immunomagnetic selection system: factors affecting the results

BACKGROUND: The isolation of CD34+ cells from mobilized peripheral blood is being increasingly used in the setting of allogeneic or autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation. Investigation of variables that may influence the effectiveness of CD34+ cell selection is of interest. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Fifty-one CD34+ cell selections from peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) (39 allogeneic and 12 autologous) were performed using a magnetic cell separator (Isolex 300i, Baxter), including version 2.0 software. The results obtained were analyzed for different processing variables. The feasibility of transplanting these isolated CD34+ cells was also analyzed. RESULTS: The isolated CD34+ cell fraction had a median purity of 88.9 percent (range, 47.8-98.3). The median recovery of CD34+ cells was 45.1 percent (13.8-76.2), and the median colony-forming unit- granulocyte-macrophage (CFU-GM) content was 17. 2 percent (0.8-58.6). Logarithms of T- and B-cell depletion had median values of 3.7 and 2.8, respectively. The version 2.0 software of the Isolex 300i gave a higher CD34+ cell recovery in the enriched cell fraction (median 57.8%) than did version 1.11 (39.4%) or 1.12 (44.4%) (p = 0.01). The use of recombinant human deoxyribonuclease I during cell processing yielded more CD34+ cells (53% vs. 41%, p = 0. 01) and higher purity (92.8% vs. 87%, p = 0.03). There was a correlation between the percentage of CD34+ cells labeled with the monoclonal antibody 8G12 clone and the percentage of CD34+ cells labeled with the monoclonal antibody used during the processing technique (9C5 clone) in the initial, enriched, and depleted CD34+ cell fractions (R(2) = 0.95; 0.92; 0.78, p< 0.005, respectively). Median times for recovering >0.5 x 10(9) per L of granulocytes and >20 x 10(9) per L of platelets were 13 and 16 days in the allograft patients and 13 and 14 days in the autograft patients. CONCLUSION: CD34+ cells can be highly and effectively isolated from allogeneic and autologous grafts by use of this automated technique, with a high grade of T- and B-cell depletion. These purified CD34+ cell components can engraft normally.     

Effect of filgrastim administration for steady-state mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells.

To obtain a better (optimal) schedule of peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collection by steady-state granulocyte colony-stimulating factor administrations for autologous or allogeneic transplantations, we compared the effect of doses of filgrastim (8 microg/kg/day versus 16 microg/kg/day) for the steady-state mobilization of PBSCs. The effects of a filgrastim dose of 8 microg/kg/day were not significantly different from those of a dose of 16 microg/kg/day. In the group of patients receiving 8 microg/kg/day, the CD34+ cells over 3 x 10(6)/kg donor body weight were harvested in 3 patients who did not have a long history of receiving combination chemotherapy. The administration of 8 microg/kg filgrastim was adopted also for allogeneic PBSC mobilization for 24 healthy donors. All healthy donors donated an adequate number of PBSCs (CD34+ cells over 4 x 10(6)/kg of recipient body weight) and tolerated this mobilization well with no serious complications. In PBSC mobilization with healthy donors, the maximal yields of CD34+ cells from Day 4 to Day 6 were seen on the fifth day in most cases.