Intubation in a patient with lingual tonsil hypertrophy using an intubating laryngeal mask airway in combination with fiberoptic intubation

A 66-yr-old man was scheduled for colon resection under general anesthesia. There were no findings suggesting difficulty of airway management. After induction of anesthesia, manual ventilation via a facemask was suboptimal, but increased fresh gas flow improved it. At direct laryngoscopy after achieving muscular relaxation, the arytenoids and epiglottis could not be seen even by an expert anesthesiologist. Intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA) was inserted to patient's larynx and ventilation could be continued. Tracheal intubation through ILMA was impossible because of hard resistance for inserting the endotracheal tube. Fiberoptic bronchoscopy revealed that the hypertrophied lingual tonsil obstructed the aperture of ILMA. Several attempts were made for intubation using fiberoptic tracheal intubation technique through ILMA and finally the patient's trachea was intubated without any bleeding or swelling of laryngeal tissues. The effectiveness of ILMA for the patient with lingual tonsil hypertrophy is still unknown, but the insertion of ILMA might be considered for safe airway management in combination with a fiberscope.     

The intubating laryngeal mask airway with and without fiberoptic guidance

We conducted this feasibility study using the intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA) and a polyvinyl chloride tracheal tube to compare success rates, hemodynamic effects, and postoperative morbidity with two methods of tracheal intubation. After ethics approval and informed consent, 90 healthy ASA physical status I or II women with normal airways were enrolled in the randomized, controlled study. After a standardized inhaled anesthesia induction protocol, tracheal intubations using ILMA with fiberoptic guidance (ILMA-FOB) and ILMA inserted blindly without fiberoptic guidance (ILMA-Blind) were compared with the control group of direct laryngoscopy (laryngoscopy group). All 90 patients were successfully ventilated. For tracheal intubation, success rates were equal in all three groups (97%). Total intubation times were longer for the ILMA-FOB group (77 s versus 48.5 s for laryngoscopy and 53.5 s for ILMA-Blind). The laryngoscopy group had a larger increase in mean arterial blood pressure to tracheal intubation. There were no differences in postoperative sore throat or hoarseness among the groups. In conclusion, success rates are equally high for tracheal intubation using ILMA-Blind and ILMA-FOB techniques in women with normal airways. IMPLICATIONS: The intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA) can be used as a primary airway for oxygenation and ventilation. Both methods of tracheal intubation using the ILMA were equally successful. Postoperative morbidity in the ILMA groups was similar to that in the laryngoscopy group. For women with normal airways, both the ILMA inserted blindly and the ILMA with fiberoptic guidance are suitable alternatives to laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation.     

Use of the intubating laryngeal mask airway to facilitate awake orotracheal intubation in patients with cervical spine disorders.

Airway management in patients with unstable cervical spines remains a challenge for anesthesia providers. Because neurologic evaluations may be required following tracheal intubation and positioning for the surgical procedure, an awake intubation technique is desirable in this patient population. In this report, we describe the use of an intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA) to facilitate awake tracheal intubation in two patients with cervical spine disorders. After topical local analgesia, the ILMA was inserted easily, and a tracheal tube was passed through the glottic opening without complications. Thus, the ILMA may be an acceptable alternative to the fiberoptic bronchoscope for awake tracheal intubation.     

The intubating laryngeal mask airway in failed fibreoptic intubation

PURPOSE: Prediction of difficult tracheal intubation is not always reliable and management with fibreoptic intubation is not always successful. We describe two cases in which blind intubation through the intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA FasTrach) succeeded after fibreoptic intubation failed. CLINICAL FEATURES: The first patient, a 50 yr old man, was scheduled for elective craniotomy for intracerebral tumour. Difficulty with intubation was not anticipated. Manual ventilation was easily performed following induction of general anesthesia, but direct laryngoscopy revealed only the tip of the epiglottis. Intubation attempts with a styletted 8.0 mm endotracheal tube and with the fibreoptic bronchoscope were unsuccessful. A #5 FasTrach was inserted through which a flexible armored cuffed 8.0 mm silicone tube passed into the trachea at the first attempt. The second patient, a 43 yr old man, presented with limited mouth opening, swelling of the right submandibular gland that extended into the retropharynx and tracheal deviation to the left. He was scheduled for urgent tracheostomy. Attempted awake fibreoptic orotracheal intubation under topical anesthesia showed gross swelling of the pharyngeal tissues and only fleeting views of the vocal cords. A #4 FasTrach was easily inserted, a clear airway obtained and a cuffed 8.0 mm silicone tube passed into the trachea at the first attempt. CONCLUSION: The FasTrach may facilitate blind tracheal intubation when fibreoptic intubation is unsuccessful.     

The LMA Fastrach™ facilitates fibreoptic intubation in oral cancer patients

PURPOSE: To compare ease of endotracheal intubation with the Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway (ILMA) tracheal tube (TT; for LMA-Fastrach) and regular PVC TT (Portex) for nasotracheal fibreoptic intubation in oral cancer patients with a difficult airway. METHODS: 40 patients of physical status ASA I-II with a history of previous oral cancer surgery and/or postoperative radiotherapy scheduled for oral cancer surgery were randomly allocated by sealed envelopes to undergo tracheal intubation with either the ILMA TT or a standard TT. Ease of nasal passage of the TT and ease of tracheal intubation over the fibrescope was assessed. Peak airway pressures were assessed intraoperatively and postoperatively for 12 hr. RESULTS: The use of the ILMA TT increased the ease of nasotracheal intubation by increasing the percentage of successful tube placements at the first attempt (80%) in comparison with standard TT (35%); (P < 0.05). Peak airway pressures were found to remain low with the ILMA TT. None of the patients experienced any airway related complications. CONCLUSIONS: Use of a soft, flexible, nonkinking ILMA TT with a tapered tip design facilitates passage into the trachea over a fibreoptic bronchoscope and allows maintenance of lower airway pressures. The ILMA TT may be a useful adjunct for management of the difficult airway in oral cancer surgery.     

Removal of the connector on the laryngeal mask airway provides a useful alternative to the intubating laryngeal mask

PURPOSE: We describe two cases in which fiberoptic intubation through the standard laryngeal mask airway (LMA) was successful with large-bore tracheal tubes (TTs) when an intubating LMA (ILMA) could not be used. CLINICAL FEATURES: Patient # 1, with obstructive sleep apnea, underwent elective surgical repair. His mouth opening was just under 25 mm, but difficult intubation was not anticipated. We induced general anesthesia, easily ventilated the patient by mask, and established neuromuscular blockade. Direct laryngoscopy and attempts to insert either a #5 or a #4 ILMA into the mouth failed. A standard #4 LMA, with the connector removed, was inserted, through which a 7.0 mm nasal RAE TT, fiberoptically guided, passed into the trachea at the first attempt. Patient #2, with a loosened implant after left hip arthroplasty, underwent revision prosthesis. Her neck movement was limited. We thus planned awake securing of the airway, but the patient refused. We induced anesthesia and established bag-mask-valve ventilation. The limited neck movement prevented direct laryngoscopy. Visualizing the laryngeal inlet with the fiberoptic bronchoscope (FOB) proved impossible as bloody secretions obscured the FOB's tip. Ventilation by mask was easy. As an ILMA was not available, we removed a #5 LMAs connector and passed an 8.0 mm nasal RAE TT through the LMA. Fiberoptic-guided intubation was easy. In both cases, the remainder of the intraoperative course was uneventful. CONCLUSION: A standard LMA whose connector has been removed to allow passage of TTs of >6.0 mm internal diameter may be substituted for the ILMA when necessary.     

Anesthetic management of an infant with Cornelia de Lange syndrome

We report anesthetic management of an infant with Cornelia de Lange syndrome. A 12-month-old girl with Cornelia de Lange syndrome was scheduled for ureterocystoneostomy because of vesicoureteral reflux. Preoperative physical examination suggested difficult tracheal intubation. After induction of anesthesia with sevoflurane (5%) in nitrous oxide (70%) and oxygen, a laryngeal mask airway (# 1.5) was inserted. A guide wire was inserted in the trachea through a laryngeal mask airway under direct vision of a fiberoptic bronchoscope. A tube-exchanger stylet was inserted around the guide wire after the laryngeal mask airway and fiberoptic bronchoscope had been removed. An endotracheal tube (ID 4.0 mm) was easily intubated around the tube-exchanger stylet. During the surgery, anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane (2-3%) in nitrous oxide (50%) and oxygen. There was no perioperative pulmonary complication.     

Fastrach intubation in patients with cervical disease

The Fastrach laryngeal mask for intubation is a new device designed for blind orotracheal intubation in patients with criteria predictive of difficult airway control. The new device looks like the conventional laryngeal mask but offers a series of design changes that allow orotracheal intubation to be accomplished without visualization of the glottis. The rigid metal tube is bent and incorporates a metal handle; the two fixed bars that prevent the epiglottis from falling and blocking the opening have been replaced by a moveable bar that rises with the passage of the endotracheal tube and the exit of the V-shaped metal tube guides the endotracheal tube that was specially designed for this use. We describe three patients with cervical disease, one with advanced ankylosing spondylitis, one with traumatic luxation of the C6-C7 articulation and one diagnosed of two cervical disk hernias. All their tracheas were intubated without difficulty through the Fastrach mask with the patients' heads in neutral position. Although fiberoptic bronchoscopy is the method of choice in patients with cervical problems, the non-availability of the technique and the need for training in its use make the Fastrach mask an alternative worth considering for such patients.     

A comparative study of tracheal intubation using an intubating laryngeal mask (Fastrach) alone or together with a lightwand (Trachlight)

Study Objective: To determine if the Trachlight^TM lightwand can facilitate Fastrach^TM intubation by guiding the tip of the endotracheal tube into the trachea.

Design: Open-label, prospective, randomized, comparative study.

Setting: General operating suites of a tertiary teaching hospital.

Patients: 172 elective surgical patients requiring general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation.

Interventions: With general anesthesia, the Fastrach™, which is a new intubating laryngeal mask airway, was inserted into the oropharynx. Ventilation was ensured before the insertion of an endotracheal tube via the Fastrach™. Tracheal intubation was then performed randomly (coin toss) using either the endotracheal tube alone (Fastrach™ group), or endotracheal tube with the Trachlight, a lightwand (Fastrach/Trachlight™ group). The time to place the Fastrach™ and endotracheal tube, to remove the Fastrach™, and the total time to intubate were recorded. The number of attempts, failures, trauma, sore throats, and hemodynamic changes were also recorded. Data were analyzed using unpaired t-test, ANOVA with repeated measures, or Chi-squares contingency table where appropriate.

Measurements and Main Results: Although there were no differences in the times to place the Fastrach™, and endotracheal tube, the hemodynamic changes, and postoperative complications, there were significantly more attempts and failures in the Fastrach™ group compared to the Fastrach™/Trachlight™ group. There were no differences in the incidence of sore throat and trauma in between the groups.

Conclusions: Although tracheal intubation is effective using a Fastrach™ alone (76% success rate), it is more effective when the Fastrach™ is used in conjunction with the Trachlight™ (95%). These results suggest that the lightwand is a useful adjunct for Fastrach™ intubation. However, the role of Fastrach™ intubation together with the Trachlight™ in the management of patients with a potential difficult airway remains to be determined.     

Erste Erfahrungen mit der Intubationslarynxmaske

Objective: We report our initial experience with an improved model of the laryngeal mask airway, the intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA, commercial name Fastrach), which was designed by A.I.J. Brain to improve blind endotracheal intubation through a laryngeal mask. Methods: In the ILMA, a number of construction details were newly designed compared to a standard laryngeal mask airway (SLM): 1) the angle between the shaft and the mask plane is changed, and also the radius of the shaft, 2) the internal diameter of the shaft is increased to allow the passage of an 8.0 mm cuffed endotracheal tube, resulting in an outer diameter of 2.0 cm, 3) a stable rubber lip (epiglottic elevating bar) is incorporated instead of the gills to clear the epiglottis out of the lumen during the passage of the endotracheal tube, 4) the shaft is manufactured out of stainless steel covered by silicone with a handle attached for more precise guidance. We prospectively used the ILMA in 80 patients for blind intubation. 51 had normal anatomy (group I), 19 were difficult to intubate (Cormack grade 3–4; group II), 18 had a reduced mouth opening (≤2.5 cm awake; group III), 8 of them also were difficult to intubate. Results: Insertion of the ILMA and ventilation was possible in all patients but one with a mouth opening of 1.3 cm during anaesthesia. 4 patients with difficult intubation and one with normal anatomy could not be ventilated with a face mask but could be ventilated with the ILMA. Blind intubation was successful in 69 out of 80 patients (global success rate 87%; group I: 84%; II: 95%; III: 83%), in 38 during the first attempt (initial success rate 48%; group I: 45%; II: 63%; III: 44%), showing no difference for patients with normal anatomy, difficult intubation or reduced mouth opening. For 82 successful intubations, 157 intubation attempts were performed (success rate per attempt 52%; group I: 48%; II: 67%; III: 54%). Success rate per attempt decreased to 42%, if intubation was not successful during the first attempt (106 intubation attempts resulting in 44 successful intubations, including 31 intubation attempts for 11 failures; group I: 35%; II: 56%; III: 38%). Intubation through the ILMA was not possible in 11 patients (14%). Failures to intubate were caused by a reduced mouth opening in 1 patient, an unsuited endotracheal tube in 1 patient, a wrong size of the ILMA may have been the cause in 6 patients, in the remaining 3, lacking personal skill may have been responsible. Endotracheal tubes suited to be used with the ILMA are straight or preformed Woodbridge tubes, whereas standard plastic tubes are too stiff. Manouvres facilitating blind intubation though the ILMA were careful alignment of the ILMA with the handle, an up and down manouvre, rotation of the tube or head movements. Conclusion: The ILMA improved ventilation compared to a face mask and almost doubled the success rate of blind intubation compared to a SLM in our hands in a variety of intubation situations. The ILMA has the potential to be useful in difficult to intubate patients – except those with cervical pathology – or in emergency medicine. Handling can be trained during every day routine. Experienced judgement of definite endotracheal tube placement is mandatory.     

Feasibility of flexible lightwand-guided tracheal intubation with the intubating laryngeal mask during out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation by an emergency physician

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: We tested the feasibility of using the intubating laryngeal mask airway Fastrach (ILMA) as a ventilatory device and for flexible lightwand-guided tracheal intubation for out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation by an emergency physician. METHODS: After completion of a training programme, a single experienced emergency physician used the technique for all patients requiring out-of-hospital tracheal intubation over a 10-month period. If access to the head and neck was limited, the intubating laryngeal mask airway was inserted from below and to the side, otherwise it was inserted from above the head. Data about the time for the ambulance to reach the patient, whether or not access to the head and neck was limited, whether or not circulation was successfully restored, and the insertion and intubation success rates were noted. RESULTS: The mean (range) time for the ambulance to reach the patient was 12 (10-20) min. Access to the head and neck was limited in 8/37 (22%). Circulation was successfully restored in 10/37 (27%). The intubating laryngeal mask airway was successfully inserted at the first attempt in 35/37 (95%) and at the second attempt in 2/37 (5%). The tracheal tube was successfully inserted in 25/37 (67.5%) at the first attempt, 7/37 (19%) at the second attempt and 5/37 (13.5%) at the third attempt. There were no overall failures for intubating laryngeal mask airway insertion or tracheal intubation. There were no differences in success rate between positions. Oesophageal intubation was detected and corrected in 2/37 (5%). CONCLUSION: The intubating laryngeal mask airway has a high success rate as a ventilatory device and as a flexible lightwand-guided airway intubator during out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation by a well-trained emergency physician. This technique may be particularly useful when there is limited access to the head and neck.     

Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway in Morbidly Obese and Lean Patients: A Comparative Study

Background: The intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA) was designed using the characteristics of healthy-weight subjects but was shown to be an effective airway device in morbidly obese patients. The authors compared airway management quality in morbidly obese and lean patients with use of the ILMA.

Methods: Fifty morbidly obese and 50 lean patients (mean body mass indexes, 42 and 27 kg/m2, respectively) were enrolled in this prospective study. After induction of general anesthesia, characteristics of airway management were judged on safety and efficiency parameters, including success rate at ventilation and intubation and airway management quality criteria, such as the number of patients who required adjustment maneuvers, the number of failed tracheal intubation attempts, the total duration of airway management, and an overall difficulty visual analog scale score.

Results: The ILMA was successfully inserted and adequate ventilation through the ILMA was achieved in all 100 patients. The success rates of tracheal intubation through the ILMA were similar in obese and lean patients (96% and 94%, respectively). The numbers of failed blind tracheal access attempts and patients who required airway-adjustment maneuvers were significantly reduced in obese patients as compared with lean patients. Four obese patients experienced transient episodes of oxygen desaturation (oxygen saturation < 90%) before adequate bag ventilation was established with the ILMA.     

Comparison of the Performance of ‘Intubating LMA’ and ‘Cobra PLA’ as an aid to blind endotracheal tube insertion in patients scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia

ObjectiveSupraglottic airways (SGA) through which blind endotracheal intubation is made possible is an area of considerable interest. Our study aimed at comparing the Cobra Perilaryngeal Airway (CPLA) with the Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway (ILMA) with regard to the performance of the former as a conduit for facilitating blind endotracheal intubation.MethodsAmerican Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I–II patients consenting to the study, with no predictors of difficult airway, scheduled for elective surgery were randomized into two groups of 30 each. Anesthesia was induced with fentanyl, propofol and vecuronium. CPLA was inserted in Group I and ILMA in Group II. Fibreoptic scoring of the laryngeal view was done through the SGA. Blind intubation through either CPLA or ILMA was then carried out with cuffed polyvinyl chloride (PVC) tube in Group I and ILMA-tracheal tube in Group II.ResultsDemographic and surgical data were comparable between the two groups. The success rate of intubation (87% through CPLA and 90% through ILMA) (p value 1), number of attempts made and the fibreoptic scores (p value 0.12) were comparable between the two groups. Insertion time was significantly longer in Group I as compared with Group II (9 s vs. 4 s; p value 0.004). Trauma and sore throat were more common in Group I (p value ?0.1, 0.19 respectively). Hemodynamic monitoring showed more tachycardia during CPLA insertion as compared with ILMA (p value 0.006).ConclusionWe conclude that CPLA can be used as an effective conduit for blind endotracheal intubation with cuffed PVC tube and has comparable efficacy in tracheal intubation as that with ILMA.     

The intubating laryngeal mask. II: a preliminary clinical report of a new means of intubating the trachea

We have assessed the efficacy of a new laryngeal mask prototype, the intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA), as a ventilatory device and blind intubation guide. The ILMA consists of an anatomically curved, short, wide bore, stainless steel tube sheathed in silicone which is bonded to a laryngeal mask and a guiding handle. It has a single moveable aperture bar, a guiding ramp and can accommodate an 8 mm tracheal tube (TT). After induction of anaesthesia with propofol 2.5 mg kg-1 and fentanyl 2.5 micrograms kg-1, the device was inserted successfully at the first attempt in all 150 (100%) patients and adequate ventilation achieved in all, with minor adjustments required in four patients. Placement did not require movement of the head and neck or insertion of the fingers in the patient's mouth. Blind tracheal intubation using a straight silicone cuffed TT was attempted after administration of atracurium 0.5 mg kg-1. If resistance was felt during intubation, a sequence of adjusting manoeuvres was used based on the depth at which resistance occurred. Tracheal intubation was possible in 149 of 150 (99.3%) patients. In 75 (50%) patients no resistance was encountered and the trachea was intubated at the first attempt, 28 (19%) patients required one adjusting manoeuvre and 46 (31%) patients required 2-4 adjusting manoeuvres before intubation was successful. There were 13 patients with potential or known airway problems. The lungs of all of these patients were ventilated easily and the trachea intubated using the ILMA. In 10 of 13 (77%) of these patients, no resistance was encountered and the trachea was intubated at the first attempt; three of 13 (23%) patients required one adjusting manoeuvre. Tracheal intubation required significantly fewer adjusting manoeuvres in patients with a predicted or known difficult airway (P < 0.05). We conclude that the ILMA appeared on initial assessment to be an effective ventilatory device and intubation guide for routine and difficult airway patients not at risk of gastric aspiration.      

Airway management using the intubating laryngeal mask airway for the morbidly obese patient

We studied the effectiveness of the intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA) in morbidly obese patients scheduled for bariatric surgery. We included 118 consecutive morbidly obese patients (body mass index, 45 +/- 5 kg/m(2)). After the induction of general anesthesia, the laryngeal view was classified by the first observer according to the method of Cormack and Lehane. The ILMA was then inserted, and the trachea was intubated through the ILMA by a second observer. The rate of successful tracheal intubation with ILMA was 96.3%. The success rate, the number of attempts, and the total duration of the procedure were not different among patients with low-grade (Cormack 1-2) and patients with high-grade (Cormack 3-4) laryngeal views. The time required for insertion of the ILMA was slightly longer in patients with high-grade laryngeal views. Failures of the technique were not explained by the experience of the practitioner or airway characteristics. No adverse effect related to the technique was reported. Results of this study suggest that using the ILMA provides an additional technique for airway management of morbidly obese patients. IMPLICATIONS: The intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA) provides an additional technique for airway management of morbidly obese patients. The best choice of the primary technique (laryngoscopy or ILMA) for tracheal intubation of an adult obese patient remains to be determined.     

A clinical investigation of the laryngeal mask airway

The size 2, 3 and 4 laryngeal masks (LM) were used in 50 patients having various types of clinical anesthesia. We measured the airway pressure at which gas leak occurred during the use of the LM. We compared the time taken to obtain clear airway, when patients were receiving 4.5 or 6 l.min-1 fresh flow by anesthetic machines. We compared the changes of SpO2, heart rate (HR) and arterial pressure (AP) at the time of insertion of the LM during the tracheal intubation. The LM could be successfully inserted in all the patients. Even if the head position was changed, there was no significant change in the leak pressure on each LM size. In both children and adult, the time interval taken to obtain clear airway by the LM was two-thirds of the time necessary during the tracheal intubation. While the LM or the endotracheal tube was inserted, delta SpO2 and delta HR in children, and delta AP in adult were much smaller in the LM group than in the endotracheal tube group. We conclude that the LM is very useful in the clinical anesthesia, and the LM gives less influence to cardiopulmonary system compared with tracheal intubation while offering clear airway.     

Reflex responses to insertion of the intubating laryngeal mask airway,intubation and removal of the ILMA

We studied 21 patients (ASA 1 or 2) to investigate the skin vasomotor reflex (SVmR) and haemodynamic responses to insertion of an intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA), tracheal intubation using the ILMA and removal of the ILMA. Anaesthesia was induced with fentanyl, midazolam, vecuronium and nitrous oxide. A size 4 ILMA was inserted using the standard technique, and a silicone reinforced tracheal tube (7.5 mm, ID) was passed through it. After confirming successful intubation, the ILMA was removed using the stabilizing rod. The three procedures were performed at approximately one-minute intervals. Insertion of the ILMA, intubation and removal of the ILMA all significantly reduced the skin blood flow on the ring finger in all patients. The mean amplitudes of the SVmR were 0.46 (SD 0.29), 0.54 (0.32) and 0.68 (0.21) respectively. The magnitude of the SVmR and the haemodynamic changes induced by removal of the ILMA were significantly larger than those accompanying the other two procedures. Use of the ILMA for intubation and removal of the ILMA produces three stimuli and the removal of the ILMA produces the greatest response.     

Intubating laryngeal mask airway in morbidly obese and lean patients: a comparative study

BACKGROUND: The intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA) was designed using the characteristics of healthy-weight subjects but was shown to be an effective airway device in morbidly obese patients. The authors compared airway management quality in morbidly obese and lean patients with use of the ILMA. METHODS: Fifty morbidly obese and 50 lean patients (mean body mass indexes, 42 and 27 kg/m, respectively) were enrolled in this prospective study. After induction of general anesthesia, characteristics of airway management were judged on safety and efficiency parameters, including success rate at ventilation and intubation and airway management quality criteria, such as the number of patients who required adjustment maneuvers, the number of failed tracheal intubation attempts, the total duration of airway management, and an overall difficulty visual analog scale score. RESULTS: The ILMA was successfully inserted and adequate ventilation through the ILMA was achieved in all 100 patients. The success rates of tracheal intubation through the ILMA were similar in obese and lean patients (96% and 94%, respectively). The numbers of failed blind tracheal access attempts and patients who required airway-adjustment maneuvers were significantly reduced in obese patients as compared with lean patients. Four obese patients experienced transient episodes of oxygen desaturation (oxygen saturation < 90%) before adequate bag ventilation was established with the ILMA. CONCLUSION: The authors confirmed that the ILMA was an efficient airway device for airway management of both lean and obese patients. In the conditions of this study, the authors observed that airway management with the ILMA was simpler in obese patients as compared with lean patients.     

A comparison of two tracheal intubation techniques with Trachlight and Fastrach in patients with cervical spine disorders

Optimal airway management strategies in patients with an unstable cervical spine remain controversial. A newly designed lightwand device (Trachlight) or an intubating laryngeal mask (Fastrach) may avoid hyperextension of the neck. However, there are few objective data that guide us in selecting the appropriate devices. We conducted a prospective randomized study in 148 patients who received general anesthesia for whom the operations were related to the clinical and/or radiographic evidence of cervical abnormality. Trachlight or Fastrach was used for tracheal intubation with the head and neck held in a neutral position. In the Trachlight group, intubation was successful at the first attempt in 67 of 74 (90.5%) cases and at the second attempt in 5 (6.8%) cases. In contrast, in the Fastrach group, 54 of 74 (73.0%) patients were intubated within our protocol. The mean time for successful tracheal intubation at the first attempt was significantly shorter in the Trachlight group than in the Fastrach group. The Trachlight may be more advantageous for orotracheal intubation in patients with cervical spine disorders than the Fastrach with respect to reliability, rapidity, and safety. IMPLICATIONS: The Trachlight may be more advantageous for orotracheal intubation in patients with cervical spine disorders than the Fastrach with respect to reliability, rapidity and safety.     

Airway access using an endotracheal tube changer for safe extubation in an infant with a difficult airway

We present a case where airway access was maintained using an endotracheal tube changer (ETC) after extubation in an infant with a difficult airway. A 4-month-old male infant with bilateral cleft lip and palate, micrognathia, schizencephaly, undescended testis, and abnormality of chromosomes 10 was scheduled for bilateral cleft lip repair. After anesthesia induction with thiamylal and vecuronium, we found that laryngoscopy was difficult (Cormack and Lehane grade III) despite external laryngeal compression. Since there was no fiberoptic bronchoscopy for an infant in our department, and the fact that epiglottis could be visualized with external laryngeal compression, three anesthesiologists attempted tracheal intubation in turn and intubation was successful at last. The surgery was concluded uneventfully; but since endotracheal intubation had been difficult, special care was taken for extubation. We used an ETC for tracheal tube passing into the endotracheal tube at the time of extubation. Although using the ETC in infant with difficult airway for extubation remains controversial, we believe that for a difficult airway, even in an infant, a flexible ETC is a useful device for temporal airway access after extubation.