Carboplatin in combination therapy for metastatic breast cancer

BACKGROUND: Anthracycline-based regimens have a limited role in patients with metastatic breast cancer due to cumulative cardiotoxicity and their common use in adjuvant chemotherapy. New nonanthracycline regimens are, therefore, needed for metastatic disease. Single-agent carboplatin is active in patients with previously untreated metastatic breast cancer, producing response rates of 20%-35%. Preclinical studies have demonstrated synergistic antitumor efficacy of carboplatin and trastuzumab in HER2(+) models. METHODS: Phase II and III clinical trial data of combination therapy with carboplatin (Paraplatin; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Princeton, NJ), a taxane, and/or trastuzumab (Herceptin; Genentech, Inc.; South San Francisco, CA) in metastatic breast cancer were identified from multiple sources, including: A) clinical trial data published in peer-reviewed journals within the last 5 years; B) preliminary clinical trial data from abstracts recently presented at national meetings; and C) phase III protocols currently evaluating carboplatin-based combination regimens. RESULTS: In several phase II studies, combination carboplatin and paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb) therapy was active and reasonably well tolerated in the first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer, producing objective response rates of 53%-62%-substantially higher rates than those seen in other phase II trials of either drug alone. Similar phase II data for carboplatin with docetaxel (Taxotere; Aventis; Bridgewater, NJ) have been reported, and recent phase III data suggest that adding carboplatin to a paclitaxel/trastuzumab regimen produces superior efficacy than paclitaxel/trastuzumab alone for patients with HER2(+) metastatic disease. Drug scheduling plays an important role in the therapeutic ratio of this combination treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Incorporation of carboplatin as a standard agent in first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer has support from several recent studies. Preliminary results of combination carboplatin/taxane therapy with trastuzumab in metastatic disease are encouraging, and other carboplatin combinations are also being investigated in other phase II and III trials in patients selected based on the HER2 status of their cancer. Results are eagerly awaited.     

Cost-effectiveness analysis of capecitabine in combination with docetaxel in comparison to docetaxel monotherapy in advanced or metastatic breast cancer in France

Objective to estimate the cost-effectiveness ratio of adopting capecitabine/docetaxel combination therapy in place of docetaxel alone, in France, in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC), resistant to, or relapsing after anthracycline-containing therapy, The SO14999 trial is a multicenter trial, randomized, including 511 patients equitably divided between the two groups. In addition to efficacy data, medical resource consumption related to adverse events were also collected in this trial ("piggy-back" analysis). French cost were associated to each data in order to estimate the medical cost of the two strategies from a healthpayer perspective. Afterwards, incremental cost-effectiveness analysis was performed based on the overall survival outcome and progression free survival. The addition of capecitabine to docetaxel resulted in an increase in median survival of 90 days (442 versus 352 days; p = 0.0126) and increase in the duration of progression free survival of 58 days (186 versus 128 days; p = 0.0001) compared with docetaxel alone. The total medical cost by patient was evaluated at 11,786 on average IC95% = [10,982-12,591] in the arm in association versus 11,570 IC95% = [10,719-12,421] in the arm in monotherapy; that is to say a non-significant overcost of 216 under capecitabine (p = 0.642). Moreover, the additional cost per year of life saved was estimated at 952 and the one without progression of the disease was established at 1,198 . A combined treatment associating capecitabine and docetaxel proves to be a cost-effectiveness strategy compared with the use of docetaxel alone, in the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer in France.     

The evolving role of capecitabine in breast cancer

Breast cancer is the most common cancer and the second greatest cause of cancer-related death among women in the United States. Capecitabine is a selectively tumor-activated fluoropyrimidine carbamate that is converted to 5-fluorouracil by the sequential activity of these enzymes, the final of which is thymidine phosphorylase, which is overexpressed in many human cancers. Capecitabine as a single agent and in combination with other drugs is efficacious in previously treated and untreated metastatic breast cancer (MBC). The integration of capecitabine, either as a single agent or in combination with docetaxel, into adjuvant breast cancer therapy is justified due to its high antitumor activity in previously treated and untreated MBC, its tolerability, lack of cross-resistance with the anthracyclines and taxanes, and because combined docetaxel/capecitabine improves the overall survival of patients with MBC. Capecitabine is being evaluated as preoperative therapy in patients with operable breast cancer, as adjuvant therapy in patients with high-risk node-negative or node-positive disease, and as oral single-agent therapy in women > or = 65 years of age. This article is an overview of published studies of capecitabine in MBC and the studies that are planned or have been proposed to evaluate capecitabine as adjuvant therapy for breast cancer.     

Capecitabine: expanding options for the treatment of patients with early or locally advanced breast cancer

Capecitabine has proven efficacy in metastatic breast cancer, extending survival in combination with docetaxel and offering a favorable safety profile, including minimal myelosuppression and alopecia, as a single agent. It is therefore logical that capecitabine could build on the improved outcomes achieved with taxanes in early breast cancer. In the neoadjuvant setting, a phase III trial of capecitabine and docetaxel (XT) versus doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) showed that XT was more effective than AC in terms of clinical response rate and pathologic complete response rate, with a manageable safety profile. Other studies, including a phase III trial of capecitabine, epirubicin, and docetaxel, a phase III trial of capecitabine and vinorelbine, and several phase II studies of different regimens with capecitabine, have confirmed the high activity of neoadjuvant capecitabine, with acceptable safety. In the adjuvant setting, a Finnish phase III study (FinXX) of sequential XT followed by cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and capecitabine versus docetaxel followed by 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide has shown favorable safety with lower doses of both capecitabine and docetaxel in the XT combination. Efficacy results from that trial are eagerly awaited. A large, ongoing trial program is continuing to explore the potential for capecitabine in the treatment of early breast cancer, looking at capecitabine-taxane combinations, capecitabine maintenance therapy, capecitabine for elderly patients, and sequential versus combination therapy, involving >20,000 patients.     

The choice of adjuvant combination therapies with taxanes: rationale and issues addressed in ongoing studies

The taxanes are emerging as the most powerful compounds in breast cancer. Both compounds, paclitaxel and docetaxel, have been evaluated in the metastatic setting before proceeding with adjuvant trials. Docetaxel was shown in phase III trials to be superior, in particular, in terms of time to progression and survival, to salvage polychemotherapies after failure of prior chemotherapy including anthracyclines. Also, after failure of alkylating agents, a benefit in favor of docetaxel was reported when compared to doxorubicin, whereas paclitaxel was reported to be either as efficacious or inferior to doxorubicin, while being comparable to cyclophosphamide/methotrexate/5-fluorouracil. The role of taxanes in combination with anthracyclines in first-line therapy of advanced breast cancer is still unclear although emerging. One phase III trial showed the significant superiority of doxorubicin/docetaxel (AT) versus doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (AC) in terms of response and time to progression. Several phase II studies with paclitaxel (over 3 hours) and anthracyclines in the metastatic setting showed high efficacy, but they also showed cardiac toxicity related to a pharmacokinetic interaction between the 2 agents. This fact led to the implementation of metastatic strategies (several phase III trials) aimed at avoiding the pharmacokinetic interaction or specifically limiting the cardiac toxicity that resulted in contradictory results. Consequently, adjuvant strategies with paclitaxel focused mostly on the sequential approach (AC followed by paclitaxel). In contrast, adjuvant strategies with docetaxel/anthracycline-based programs were implemented following both sequential and combination approaches. Results of all of these trials in the adjuvant setting are eagerly awaited in order to establish the role of taxanes in adjuvant breast cancer.     

The role of capecitabine in first-line treatment for patients with metastatic breast cancer

Capecitabine is an important drug in the therapeutic armamentarium for metastatic breast cancer. A comprehensive worldwide clinical trial program involving >10,000 patients with locally advanced and metastatic breast cancer has provided evidence for the current treatment strategies. On the basis of data demonstrating consistent activity across several trials in patients with heavily pretreated breast cancer, capecitabine was approved in the U.S. in 1998 for the treatment of patients with metastatic disease resistant to paclitaxel and anthracycline-containing therapy, with later European Union approval for single-agent capecitabine in the metastatic setting. Capecitabine plus docetaxel (XT) was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer in 2001 on the basis of the large phase III trial comparing XT with docetaxel alone, which showed a survival advantage for combination therapy compared with single-agent therapy. This was shortly followed by European approval for the combination in metastatic breast cancer. The clinical utility of capecitabine in the management of breast cancer is supported by its convenient oral dosing schedule and favorable safety profile, as well as its excellent clinical activity in primary and metastatic breast cancer. Recently, clinical trials have studied single-agent capecitabine as first-line treatment and evaluated other capecitabine-containing combinations with cytotoxic and novel targeted agents.     

Taxane/anthracycline combinations: setting a new standard in breast cancer?

Among the novel chemotherapeutic drugs introduced in the 1990s, the taxanes have emerged as the most powerful compounds in breast cancer. Both compounds, paclitaxel and docetaxel, have been evaluated in metastatic settings before adjuvant trials proceeded. Docetaxel was shown in several phase III trials to be superior, particularly in terms of survival, for salvaging polychemotherapies after failure of prior chemotherapy, including that with anthracyclines. A benefit of docetaxel was also reported when compared with doxorubicin after failure of alkylating agents. In phase III trials paclitaxel was reported to be as efficacious over 24 hours as doxorubicin 60 mg/m(2), while paclitaxel was significantly inferior to doxorubicin 75 mg/m(2) over 3 hours and was close to CMF in another trial. The role of taxanes in combination with anthracyclines in first-line therapy of advanced breast cancer is emerging. Following several phase II studies, a phase III trial showed the significant superiority of docetaxel/doxorubicin (AT) versus doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (AC) in terms of response and time to progression. In several phase II studies with paclitaxel (3 hours), anthracyclines in the metastatic setting showed high efficacy but produced cardiac toxicity related to a pharmacokinetic interaction between the two agents. This finding led to the implementation of metastatic strategies (phase III trials) aimed at avoiding the pharmacokinetic interaction, while the adjuvant strategies with paclitaxel focused primarily on the sequential approach (AC followed by paclitaxel). In contrast, adjuvant strategies with docetaxel/anthracycline-based programs were implemented following both sequential and combination approaches.     

Spotlight on Capecitabine in the Management of Advanced Breast Cancer

Capecitabine is an orally administered prodrug of fluorouracil which is indicated in the US and Europe, in combination with docetaxel, for the treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer failing anthracycline therapy, and as monotherapy for metastatic breast cancer resistant to paclitaxel and anthracycline therapy (US) or failing intensive chemotherapy (Europe). Capecitabine is also approved for use in metastatic colorectal cancer. Capecitabine is metabolically activated preferentially at the tumor site, and shows antineoplastic activity and synergy with other cytotoxic agents including cyclophosphamide or docetaxel in animal models. Bioavailability after oral administration is close to 100%. In patients with pretreated advanced breast cancer, capecitabine is effective as monotherapy and also in combination with other agents. Combination therapy with capecitabine 1250 mg/m² twice daily for 2 weeks of every 3-week cycle plus intravenous docetaxel 75 mg/m² on day one of each cycle was superior to intravenous monotherapy with docetaxel 100 mg/m² on day one of each cycle. Capecitabine plus docetaxel significantly reduced the risks of disease progression and death by 35% (p = 0.0001) and 23% (p < 0.05), respectively, and significantly increased median survival (p < 0.05) and objective response rates (p < 0.01). Efficacy has also been demonstrated with capecitabine monotherapy and combination therapy in previously untreated patients in preliminary trials. The most common adverse effects occurring in patients receiving capecitabine monotherapy include lymphopenia, anemia, diarrhea, hand-and-foot syndrome, nausea, fatigue, hyperbilirubinaemia, dermatitis and vomiting (all >25% incidence). While gastrointestinal events and hand-and-foot syndrome occurred more often with capecitabine than with paclitaxel or a regimen of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil (CMF), neutropenic fever, arthralgia, pyrexia and myalgia were more common with paclitaxel, and nausea, stomatitis, alopecia and asthenia were more common with CMF. The incidence of adverse effects and hospitalization was similar in patients receiving capecitabine plus docetaxel and those receiving docetaxel monotherapy. In conclusion, capecitabine, an oral prodrug of fluorouracil which is activated preferentially at the tumor site, is an effective and convenient addition to the intravenous polychemotherapeutic treatment of advanced breast cancer in pretreated patients, and also has potential as a component of first-line combination regimens. Combined capecitabine plus docetaxel therapy resulted in similar rates of treatment-related adverse effects and hospitalization to those seen with docetaxel monotherapy. Capecitabine is also effective as monotherapy in pretreated patients and phase II data for capecitabine as first-line monotherapy are also promising. While gastrointestinal effects and hand-and-foot syndrome occur often with capecitabine, the tolerability profile was comparatively favorable for other adverse effects (notably, neutropenia and alopecia).     

Review of capecitabine as oral treatment of gastric, gastroesophageal, and esophageal cancers

Capecitabine is a novel, orally administered fluoropyrimidine carbamate that has been approved for adjuvant treatment in patients with Stage III colon cancer, first-line metastatic colorectal cancer, and metastatic breast cancer, both as a single agent (for patients who are resistant to paclitaxel and anthracyclines) and in combination with docetaxel (after failure on anthracycline-based therapy). Capecitabine is being investigated in Phase I and II trials for the treatment of gastric, gastroesophageal, and esophageal cancers, primarily in the first-line metastatic setting but also in the adjuvant setting. The MEDLINE data base was searched for English-language clinical trials that were published from 1996 through October 2005 along with relevant abstracts that were presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology and at meetings of the European Cancer Conference and the European Society of Medical Oncology. The most frequently investigated combinations were capecitabine with docetaxel, paclitaxel, cisplatin, or oxaliplatin, and capecitabine also has been combined with irinotecan. These therapies have yielded efficacy data that compare favorably with data from Phase III trials of parenteral 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in the first-line metastatic setting, and they mostly are well tolerated. Capecitabine, when combined in doses <1250 mg/m(2) twice daily, consistently resulted in a lower frequency of Grade 3 or 4 toxic effects. Capecitabine, as a representative of oral fluoropymidine, is a promising agent in gastroesophageal cancers. Although some Phase III trials are completed, additional Phase III trials of capecitabine-based combinations that compare its efficacy and safety with parenteral 5-FU-based combinations, in both first-line metastatic and adjuvant settings, would be important.     

Survival benefit with capecitabine/docetaxel versus docetaxel alone: analysis of therapy in a randomized phase III trial

In a large phase III trial of 511 patients with anthracycline-pretreated advanced/metastatic breast cancer, capecitabine/docetaxel combination therapy was shown to have significantly superior efficacy compared with single-agent docetaxel, including superior progression-free and overall survival and objective response rate. An updated survival analysis with >/= 27 months follow-up shows that patients receiving combination therapy maintained significantly superior survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.777 [95% CI, 0.645-0.942]; P < 0.01; median survival, 14.5 months vs. 11.5 months) compared with those receiving single-agent docetaxel. Following the failure of docetaxel monotherapy, 35% of patients did not receive additional cytotoxic chemotherapy. Among patients randomized to single-agent docetaxel, only those given poststudy single-agent capecitabine had significantly prolonged survival compared with those given any other poststudy chemotherapy (HR, 0.500; P = 0.0046; median survival, 21.0 months vs. 12.3 months, respectively). By contrast, poststudy vinorelbine-containing chemotherapy did not affect survival following progression on single-agent docetaxel compared with other poststudy chemotherapy regimens (HR, 1.014; P = 0.94; median survival, 13.5 months vs. 12.6 months, respectively). Among patients randomized to combination therapy, discontinuing docetaxel of capecitabine has a similar effect on survival (HR, 0.720; P = 0.20; median survival, 15.8 months vs. 18.3 months, respectively). Median survival was 18.3 months in patients who discontinued docetaxel and continued to receive capecitabine versus 15.8 months in patients who discontinued capecitabine and continued to receive docetaxel, with a trend toward improved survival in patients continuing to receive capecitabine. Although this is a retrospective analysis, these data suggest that the sequential administration of docetaxel followed by capecitabine is associated with prolonged survival in patients who are candidates for sequential single-agent therapy.     

Capecitabine and vinorelbine in metastatic breast cancer

BackgroundAs anthracyclines and taxanes are frequently used in the adjuvant and first-line metastatic settings, capecitabine and vinorelbine are frequently used as monotherapy and in combination for metastatic breast cancer (MBC). In the absence of comparative, phase III data, retrospective analyses and cross-trial comparisons provide the only indication of the relative efficacy of these options.MethodsWe reviewed studies evaluating the 2 agents alone or in combination in MBC.ResultsWe identified 6 capecitabine and 2 vinorelbine phase III trials, numerous phase II monotherapy studies and 35 phase I/II studies exploring capecitabine–vinorelbine combination therapy (1 with trastuzumab in HER2-positive MBC).ConclusionFor monotherapy, the limited, retrospective comparative evidence supported by consistent prospective data suggests that capecitabine is more effective than vinorelbine. Comorbidities, organ function tolerability, tumour biology and patient characteristics should also inform treatment choice. If combination therapy is deemed clinically appropriate, intravenous vinorelbine with capecitabine may be considered, potentially improving efficacy compared with monotherapy, but at the cost of increased toxicity. Randomised evaluation versus capecitabine monotherapy is ongoing. In contrast, cross-trial comparison suggests that addition of oral vinorelbine to capecitabine adds haematological toxicity without apparently improving efficacy in pretreated MBC. Data from small, single-arm, phase II studies in the first-line setting are more encouraging. In summary, the strongest clinical data support capecitabine monotherapy in the majority of patients. In certain populations, a capecitabine–vinorelbine combination may be appropriate but requires further validation in randomised trials.     

Capecitabine

Capecitabine, an oral fluoropyrimidine carbamate, is adopted worldwide. As the treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer, capecitabine showed at least comparable efficacy with a favorable safety profile to bolus 5-FU/LV. In a large phase III trial (Xeloda Adjuvant Chemotherapy Trial: X-ACT), as the adjuvant treatment of patients with resected stage III colon cancer, capecitabine showed at least comparable disease-free survival, overall survival, and relapse-free survival with a favorable safety profile to bolus 5-FU/LV. Additionally, capecitabine-based combination regimens with oxaliplatin or irinotecan are now under evaluation. In phase II studies, capecitabine has shown the promising results in combination therapy. In Japan, capecitabine has been evaluated since 1994. In a recent phase II study, which evaluated the global dose as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer, the response rate was 35% (95% CI 23.1-48.4). The median time to disease progression was 169 days and the median overall survival was 617 days. Hand-foot syndrome (HFS), a characteristic adverse event of capecitabine, was observed in 73.3% of the patients, but the grade 3/4 was observed in 13.3% of the patients and only one patient discontinued the treatment due to HFS. An immediate approval of capecitabine in Japan is expected.     

New approaches for the treatment of colorectal cancer in the adjuvant setting

The value of adjuvant chemotherapy for some patients with stage III colorectal cancer has been established but the situation is less clear for stage II disease. Currently, infusional or bolus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/folinic acid (FA) is the treatment of choice but its success is limited and the use of combination therapies is now being investigated. The efficacy of irinotecan in metastatic disease has prompted its use in the adjuvant setting. A number of phase II and randomised phase III trials are investigating the role of irinotecan in combination with capecitabine in the metastatic setting. The role of irinotecan in combination with infusional and/or bolus 5-FU/FA and capecitabine is also under extensive review in the adjuvant setting. Adjuvant therapy with the combination of oxaliplatin/5-FU/FA has been shown to prolong three-year disease-free survival. The overall survival data for this study are not yet available. The use of targeted agents, which are not associated with the toxicities commonly associated with cytotoxic chemotherapy, are being investigated and because of their good safety profile have particular application for this stage of the disease. Biological markers which can help to identify those patients whose disease has a high likelihood of recurrence or those most likely to respond to chemotherapy will help to direct the optimum use of adjuvant therapy.     

New options for outpatient chemotherapy--the role of oral fluoropyrimidines.

For several decades fluoropyrimidines, especially 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), have played a role in standard chemotherapy regimens for a range of solid tumours, including breast and colorectal cancers. In recent years, schedule modification and biomodulation have achieved improved efficacy and tolerability. However, the complications arising from infused intravenous administration are well-recognized and there is an unmet medical need for oral agents with improved efficacy and tolerability, offering more convenient outpatient therapy.Several oral fluoropyrimidines are in development, including capecitabine, UFT (uracil plus tegafur), S-1 and eniluracil. As yet, only UFT/leucovorin and capecitabine have been evaluated in randomized phase III clinical trials in metastatic colorectal cancer. Both have demonstrated safety benefits and equivalent survival compared with the Mayo Clinic regimen, and capecitabine has demonstrated a significantly superior response rate. Time to disease progression was equivalent to the Mayo Clinic regimen with capecitabine, but inferior with UFT/leucovorin. Capecitabine is also effective in patients with taxoid-pretreated metastatic breast cancer, a population which previously had no established treatment options.Both capecitabine and UFT/leucovorin are being evaluated in combination with irinotecan and oxaliplatin in colorectal cancer, and vinorelbine and docetaxel/paclitaxel in breast cancer. In the future, these more convenient, oral fluoropyrimidines may replace intravenous 5-FU in the treatment of breast and colorectal cancer.     

Coming to grips with hand-foot syndrome. Insights from clinical trials evaluating capecitabine

Hand-foot syndrome is a localized cutaneous side effect associated with the administration of several chemotherapeutic agents, including the oralfluoropyrimidine capecitabine (Xeloda). It is never life-threatening but can develop into a painful and debilitating condition that interferes with patients' normal daily activities and quality of life. Several symptomatic/prophylactic treatments have been used to alleviate hand-foot syndrome, but as yet there is insufficient prospective clinical evidence to support their use. The only proven method of managing hand-foot syndrome is treatment modification (interruption and/or dose reduction), and this strategy is recommended for patients receiving capecitabine. Retrospective analysis of safety data from two large phase III trials investigating capecitabine as first-line therapy in patients with colorectal cancer confirms that this strategy is effective in the management of hand-foot syndrome and does not impair the efficacy of capecitabine. This finding is supported by studies evaluating capecitabine in metastatic breast cancer. Notably, the incidence and management of hand-foot syndrome are similar when capecitabine is administered in the metastatic and adjuvant settings, as monotherapy, or in combination with docetaxel (Taxotere). It is important that patients learn to recognize the symptoms of hand-foot syndrome, so that prompt symptomatic treatment and treatment modification strategies can be implemented.     

Multicentric, randomized phase III trial of two different adjuvant chemotherapy regimens plus three versus twelve months of trastuzumab in patients with HER2- positive breast cancer (Short-HER Trial; NCT00629278)

Trastuzumab, a monoclonal antibody against the HER2 receptor, is currently approved as a part of adjuvant therapy for patients with HER2-overexpressing breast tumors. The Short-HER study is a phase III randomized, multicentric Italian trial aimed at testing the optimal duration of adjuvant trastuzumab. In this trial, 2500 patients with HER2-positive breast cancer will be randomized to receive the following: (arm A, long) 4 courses of anthracycline- based chemotherapy (doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide or epidoxorubicin/cyclophosphamide) followed by 4 courses of docetaxel or paclitaxel in combination with trastuzumab, followed by 14 additional courses of trastuzumab administered every 3 weeks (for a total of 18 3-weekly doses of trastuzumab); or (arm B, short) 3 courses of 3-weekly docetaxel in combination with weekly trastuzumab (for a total of 9 weekly doses of trastuzumab) followed by 3 courses of 5-fluorouracil/epirubicin/cyclophosphamide. The primary objective is disease-free survival.     

Dose-adjusting capecitabine minimizes adverse effects while maintaining efficacy: a retrospective review of capecitabine for metastatic breast cancer

Capecitabine monotherapy is considered standard treatment in anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer and has proven efficacy in this setting. Randomized studies and retrospective analyses have shown that, in patients who received capecitabine monotherapy, or in combination with docetaxel, dose modification of capecitabine is effective in the management of adverse events without compromising efficacy. Dose adjustment of capecitabine is easy to implement due to its twice-daily oral administration. This article reports the findings of a retrospective review of a large data set to consolidate the information about the impact of capecitabine dose modification on efficacy and safety outcomes in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Data on dose modification and outcomes were available from 4 phase II capecitabine monotherapy trials, 1 phase III capecitabine/docetaxel combination trial, and an analysis of consecutive patients who received capecitabine outside of a clinical trial (n = 971). Dose reductions were required in 41% of patients who received monotherapy (n = 131) and 65% of patients who received capecitabine/docetaxel (80% of these required dose reductions of both agents) (n = 163). Time to disease progression and overall survival were similar, or even slightly longer, among patients who received lower vs. full-dose capecitabine in all of the studies reviewed. Reduced capecitabine doses were associated with a lower incidence of treatment-related adverse events, specifically hand-foot syndrome, diarrhea, and stomatitis. Together, these data support the practice of dose-reducing capecitabine, including the possibility of starting at a lower dose (<1250 mg/m(2) twice daily), to reduce the incidence of adverse events without compromising efficacy.     

Docetaxel for treatment of solid tumours: a systematic review of clinical data

Docetaxel is a semisynthetic taxane, a class of anticancer agents that bind to beta tubulin, thereby stabilising microtubules and inducing cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis. Docetaxel was first approved for the treatment of anthracycline-refractory metastatic breast cancer in the mid-1990s. Since then, several randomised trials have reported improved time-to-progression, overall survival, or both in metastatic breast cancer treated with single-agent docetaxel or docetaxel-based combination regimens. Data from two adjuvant trials have shown a survival benefit with the addition of docetaxel to standard anthracycline-based regimens in patients with high-risk early breast cancer. In four randomised studies, docetaxel improved survival in locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. Moreover, two trials have shown that docetaxel combined with estramustine or corticosteroids improves survival in metastatic androgen-independent prostate cancer. Here, we review major randomised phase III trials with docetaxel in the treatment of solid malignant disease.     

Ongoing US cooperative group trials using taxanes in the adjuvant setting

The use of systemic adjuvant therapy in women with early-stage breast cancer has been demonstrated to have a profound impact on survival. The role of paclitaxel and docetaxel in the adjuvant setting has attracted a great deal of attention. Both of these agents are highly active in patients with advanced breast cancer. In addition, they can be utilized in combination with anthracyclines, which have been shown to provide a slightly better outcome in patients with early-stage breast cancer compared to non-anthracycline-containing regimens. Randomized trials have demonstrated a potential role for paclitaxel in adjuvant chemotherapy. In the Cancer and Leukemia Group B 9344 trial, which explored the use of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide with or without paclitaxel, the initial analysis demonstrated a 22% reduction in the relative risk of relapse and a 26% reduction in the relative risk of death in the paclitaxel group. However, a clear role for the use of paclitaxel in adjuvant therapy remains to be defined. The Breast Cancer International Research Group trial 001 compared the combination of docetaxel/doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide to 5-fluorouracil/doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide. This trial demonstrated a promising reduction in the relative risk of recurrence of 32% for the docetaxel/doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide group. Ongoing trials will help to further define the role of taxanes in the adjuvant setting for patients with operable breast cancer.