Phase 2 evaluation of topotecan administered on a 3-day schedule in the treatment of platinum- and paclitaxel-refractory ovarian cancer

PURPOSE; The aim of this study was to investigate the toxicity and efficacy of a more convenient topotecan administration schedule (in contrast to the "standard" 1.5 mg/m(2)/day x 5 days q 21 days) in the management of platinum- and paclitaxel-refractory ovarian cancer. METHODS: Patients with clinically defined platinum- and paclitaxel-refractory ovarian cancer participating in this phase 2 trial conducted by the Gynecologic Cancer Program of the Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Center received topotecan at a dose of 1.5 mg/m(2)/day x 3 days on a 21-day schedule. Both dose escalations and reductions were permitted in the protocol design. RESULTS: A total of 29 patients (median age: 61; range: 43-80) were treated with this modified topotecan schedule. These individuals had received a median of two prior regimens (range: 1-4) (retreatment with a platinum agent or paclitaxel considered a single regimen). The median number of topotecan courses delivered was 3 (range: 1-7). Major toxicity included grade 4 neutropenia (24% of patients); neutropenic fever (10%); grade 3 thrombocytopenia (10%); and requirement for blood transfusion (14%). Dose escalation was possible, and dose reductions required, in 14 and 28% of patients, respectively. Two patients exhibited evidence of a clinically relevant response to treatment. CONCLUSION: This 3-day topotecan program is more convenient and less toxic than the standard 5-day regimen. The limited level of activity observed is not inconsistent with that previously reported for the 5-day topotecan infusion schedule in platinum/paclitaxel-refractory ovarian cancer. Further investigation will be required to document the clinical utility of a 3-day topotecan schedule in a less heavily pretreated and more chemosensitive patient population.     

A phase I trial of oxaliplatin and topotecan in recurrent ovarian carcinoma

OBJECTIVE: Oxaliplatin and topotecan have demonstrated activity as single agents against recurrent platinum-sensitive and -resistant ovarian cancer, as well as synergy in vitro. This was a dose-finding study of combination therapy with weekly topotecan and alternating-week oxaliplatin in patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. METHODS: Eligible patients had a diagnosis of recurrent ovarian or primary peritoneal carcinoma, a performance status of 0-2, and normal bone marrow, renal, and hepatic function. On days 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle, patients received a fixed dose of oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2) via intravenous infusion. On days 1, 8, and 15, patients received an escalating dose of intravenous topotecan (2.0-4.0 mg/m2). Five dose levels were planned with a minimum cohort of 3 patients at each level. RESULTS: Thirteen patients were enrolled and received a total of 50 cycles of chemotherapy. The maximum tolerated dose was 85 mg/m2 of oxaliplatin and 3.0 mg/m2 of topotecan, and grade 3 neutropenia was the dose-limiting toxicity. Four of nine (44%) evaluable patients had stable disease or a partial response to the drug combination as assessed by cancer antigen-125 levels. CONCLUSIONS: A 28-day schedule of oxaliplatin and topotecan is safe and well tolerated. Because of the in vitro synergy observed between topoisomerase I inhibitors and platinum derivatives and the tolerability reported in the current study, this regimen warrants further investigation.     

A phase I trial of gemcitabine and topotecan in previously treated ovarian or peritoneal cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study

OBJECTIVE: To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the combination of gemcitabine and topotecan in women with previously treated epithelial ovarian, peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer. METHODS: Patients with recurrent or persistent cancer after treatment with a platinum and paclitaxel-containing regimen were eligible for this study. Initial treatment was gemcitabine at a dose of 800 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and 15 and topotecan at a dose of 0.5 mg/m(2) on days 2-5, with cycles repeated every 28 days. Dose escalations were planned first for topotecan (Cohort I, Dose Levels 1-5) then for gemcitabine (Cohort II, Dose Levels 6-9) until the MTD was reached. RESULTS: Ten patients received a total of 29 cycles. When none of the first four patients could complete therapy as prescribed due to toxicity, doses for each drug were reduced by 1 day. The next six patients were treated at the modified schedule of gemcitabine days 1 and 8 and topotecan days 2-4 (Dose Level -1). Despite this modification, dose-limiting toxicities including neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and stomatitis occurred at Dose Level -1, and the study was closed early. CONCLUSIONS: At both the initial dose schedule and an attenuated schedule, the combination of gemcitabine and topotecan produced dose-limiting toxicities in women with previously treated epithelial ovarian or peritoneal cancer.     

A phase I/II trial of weekly topotecan and carboplatin in potentially platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian and peritoneal carcinoma

OBJECTIVE: Topotecan and carboplatin are active in relapsed ovarian cancer, but attempts to combine these agents are limited by myelotoxicity. This phase I/II trial combined weekly topotecan, which is less myelosuppressive than the standard 5-day regimen, with carboplatin in patients with potentially platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian or peritoneal carcinoma (PS-OVCa/PCa). METHODS: Eligible patients had PS-OVCa/PCa, performance status 0-2, and normal bone marrow, renal, and hepatic functions. On day 1 of a 21-day cycle, patients received carboplatin (area under the curve [AUC] 5) followed by topotecan 2.0 mg/m2, both via 30-min intravenous infusion. Topotecan 2.0 mg/m2 also was administered on days 8 and 15. Treatment was withheld for neutropenia or thrombocytopenia on day 8 or 15. Dose escalation was planned. RESULTS: Seventeen patients received a total of 115 (median, 6) cycles of chemotherapy. With carboplatin AUC 4, neutropenia prevented dose escalation of topotecan; hematologic toxicity caused 34/105 (32%) weekly treatments to be withheld. However, carboplatin could be dose escalated to AUC 5 when the day 15 dose of topotecan was withheld. In the intent-to-treat population, there were 4 (24%) complete and 9 (53%) partial responses, 2 (12%) patients (at the carboplatin AUC 4 dose) with stable disease, and 2 (12%) nonevaluable patients. CONCLUSION: Carboplatin (AUC 5) on day 1 in combination with topotecan 2.0 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle is well tolerated and active in patients with PS-OVCa/PCa. A phase II trial comparing this with other carboplatin therapeutic doublets in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer is warranted.     

High-dose topotecan, melphalan, and cyclophosphamide (TMC) with stem cell support: a new regimen for the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to determine the optimal dose of topotecan when used in combination with high-dose melphalan and cyclophosphamide (TMC), and to assess the toxicity and efficacy of the regimen in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. METHODS: Fifty-three patients with persistent or recurrent ovarian cancer were treated. Disease status at study entry included: platinum-sensitive recurrent disease (15 patients), platinum-resistant or refractory recurrent disease (15 patients), positive second-look surgery (16 patients), failure to achieve a primary clinical complete response (CR) (7 patients). Following stem cell mobilization and collection, patients were given cyclophosphamide 1 g/m(2)/day on Days -6, -5, -4; melphalan 70 mg/m(2)/day on Days -3, -2; and topotecan at escalating doses from 1.25 to 4.0 mg/m(2)/day on Days -6 to -2. Peripheral blood stem cells were infused on Day 0. RESULTS: The optimal topotecan dose selected for future trials was 4.0 mg/m(2)/day x 5 days. The regimen had acceptable toxicity with no regimen-related death. Toxicity (Bearman toxicity criteria) was limited mostly to grade 1-2 mucositis and diarrhea. The overall response rate of patients with measurable or evaluable disease was 93%. Median survival has not yet been reached, but with a median follow up of 18 months (range: 11-37) 77% of patients are alive. CONCLUSION: With a topotecan dose of 4.0 mg/m(2)/day x 5 days, the TMC regimen has acceptable toxicity and produces high response rates. In the setting of ovarian cancer, high-dose chemotherapy should be administered only as part of well-designed clinical trials. TMC should be considered a potential regimen for future randomized trials in patients with advanced ovarian cancer.     

Weekly topotecan in heavily pretreated patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian carcinoma

OBJECTIVE: To investigate weekly topotecan in heavily pretreated patients with recurrent ovarian cancer. METHODS: The records of patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer who were treated with weekly topotecan after failure of > or =1 prior regimen were reviewed. Patients received topotecan (median starting dose approximately 2.5 mg/m(2)) on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Antitumor response was assessed after 2 cycles by serial CA-125 levels. RESULTS: Thirty-five heavily pretreated patients received a mean of 5 cycles of topotecan (range, 1-13 cycles). Thirty-two patients had definable platinum sensitivity (16 sensitive, 8 resistant, 8 refractory). Median age was 56 years. A total of 177 cycles (534 weeks) of topotecan was administered. Hematologic toxicity was generally mild, and no grade 4 toxicities were observed. Grade 3 hematologic toxicity, including leukopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia, was observed in 2, 2, 1, and 0 patients, respectively. No patients experienced grade 3 or 4 nonhematologic toxicity. Based on serial CA-125 measurements, there were 1 (3%) complete and 5 (15%) partial responses, with 1 of the partial responses in a patient with platinum-refractory disease. Stable disease was reported in 13 (38%) patients, including 5 patients with platinum-resistant/refractory disease. CONCLUSION: Weekly topotecan demonstrates activity and is well tolerated compared with historical data with the standard 5-day schedule. Higher doses may be warranted because of the high tolerability shown for weekly topotecan. Weekly topotecan may be an appropriate treatment option for patients with recurrent ovarian cancer, especially heavily pretreated patients who might require dosing schedules with improved tolerability.     

拓扑替康联合铂类治疗晚期卵巢癌的疗效观察

目的:评价拓扑替康联合铂类(TPT+铂类)治疗晚期卵巢癌的疗效及安全性。方法:回顾分析2000年4月至2004年12月收治的符合入选标准的晚期卵巢上皮性癌患者45例,其中初治20例,复治25例。比较初治患者与同期收治的接受紫杉醇加铂类(TP方案)及环磷酰胺加铂类(PC方案)治疗者的临床有效率、中位无进展生存时间和中位生存时间。复治患者则比较一线经铂类或经紫杉醇治疗复发者的有效率、中位无进展生存时间和中位生存时间。结果:初治患者中,TPT+铂类组有效率为75.0%,中位无进展生存时间及中位生存时间分别为17.8月及29.7月,而TP组分别为82.5%,20.9月,35.3月,PC组分别71.4%,14.6月,27.8月,TPT加铂类组与TP组、PC组相比,差异无显著性(P>0.05)。复治患者中,总有效率为28.0%,一线经铂类或经紫杉醇治疗复发患者的有效率为33.3%、23.1%,中位无进展生存时间分别为11.3月、8.4月,中位生存时间分别为18.3月,17.3月,差异无显著性(P>0.05)。非血液性毒性轻微。结论:TPT联合铂类治疗晚期卵巢癌疗效肯定,特别是对复发病例有较好疗效,耐受性良好。     

Topotecan and ifosfamide as salvage treatment in advanced ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to evaluate activity and toxicity of the combination of topotecan and ifosfamide as salvage treatment in patients with advanced ovarian cancer refractory to or relapsing after platinum compound-based chemotherapy. METHODS: Thirty-nine patients entered the trial. Inclusion criteria were: previous platinum compound-based chemotherapy with or without paclitaxel, age /=50% reduction of baseline CA-125 was recorded. Significant higher response rate was observed in platinum-sensitive population (11/15 patients) compared to resistant disease (8/24 patients). CONCLUSIONS: Chemotherapy with topotecan and ifosfamide (IT) in pretreated advanced ovarian cancer patients is feasible with moderate toxicity. The potential of the regimen for synergistic drug interactions deserves further evaluations.     

A phase II study of liposomal lurtotecan (OSI-211) in patients with topotecan resistant ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVES: To determine the safety and efficacy of a novel topoisomerase I inhibitor, liposomal lurtotecan, in patients with topotecan resistant ovarian cancer. METHODS: The trial was an open-label phase II study for patients stratified by resistance to either single agent topotecan or to a prior topotecan-containing regimen. Liposomal lurtotecan was delivered at a dose of 2.4 mg/m(2) on Days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. Dose escalations and reductions were allowed based on hematologic toxicity. Patients were evaluated every two cycles for response to liposomal lurtotecan. RESULTS: Twenty-two women were accrued, with 16 women resistant to single agent topotecan and 6 women resistant to topotecan given in combination with a second chemotherapy agent. Hematologic toxicity consisted of mild to moderate thrombocytopenia, anemia, and neutropenia with mild to moderate gastrointestinal toxicity and fatigue. There were no responses, although eight patients had stable disease. CONCLUSIONS: Liposomal lurtotecan at this schedule demonstrates moderate hematologic toxicity and no evidence of clinical activity in a group of heavily pretreated women previously exposed to the topoisomerase I inhibitor topotecan. The study of this agent in alternative patient populations or with alternative schedules is ongoing.     

Phase II evaluation of a 3-day infusion of topotecan in patients with recurrent ovarian or primary peritoneal cancer

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and toxicity profile in patients treated with topotecan at 2.0 mg/m2/day x 3 days every 3 weeks. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eligibility criteria included patients with recurrent primary peritoneal or epithelial ovarian cancer with > or =6 months elapsed from time of prior platinum treatment. Patients were required to have a performance status of < or =2 and normal hepatic and renal function. Response to therapy and toxicity was assessed using standard criteria. Chi-square and Student's t tests were used as appropriate. Survival was assessed with Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: All 40 patients enrolled were assessable for response. The mean age of the patients was 63.2 years (range 43-85). Median time to progression from initial treatment was 11.8 months. A total of 286 cycles of chemotherapy were administered with an average of 7.1 cycles per patient. Overall median time to progression (TTP) with 3-day topotecan treatment was 21 weeks (range 6-43 weeks). Of the 33 patients with measurable disease, 24% (11-42%, 95% CI) demonstrated a response. Seven patients had CA-125 evaluable disease with a response of 43% (10-89%, 95% CI). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 16 weeks (range 12-21 weeks, 95% CI). Median overall survival was 106 weeks (range 76-117 weeks, 95% CI). Assessment of toxicity by patient showed 90% demonstrating grade 3/4 neutropenia with the vast majority being uncomplicated. No severe non-hematological toxicity was observed. CONCLUSION: Administration of topotecan as a 3-day regimen is feasible with demonstrable activity and tolerable toxicity. Critical comparison to the 5-day regimen in a randomized fashion is warranted.     

A phase II trial of weekly topotecan for patients with secondary platinum-resistant recurrent epithelial ovarian carcinoma following the failure of second-line therapy

OBJECTIVE: To determine the response rate, progression-free survival and toxicity associated with weekly topotecan administered to patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent epithelial ovarian (EOC) in the third-line setting. METHODS: Patients with measurable platinum-sensitive EOC following failure of second-line chemotherapy were eligible for this phase II study. All patients were initially treated with cytoreductive surgery and platinum/paclitaxel-based chemotherapy. Continuous, weekly topotecan was administered at a starting dose of 4 mg/m(2). Toxicity and efficacy were assessed at various time points after initiation of therapy. RESULTS: Twenty nine patients were enrolled in this prospective study. Toxicity was acceptable with grade 1/2 nausea being the most commonly experienced side effect (52%). Nine patients (31%) had grade 3/4 leukopenia; however, only 3 patients had febrile neutropenia. Thirteen patients had a treatment delay and six required dose reductions. Twenty two patients were evaluable for efficacy. The overall response rate for weekly topotecan was 13.6% [95% CI; -0.7-27.9%] with 1 complete response, and 2 partial responses. Twelve patients (54.5%), including 2 with minor responses, had stable disease for a median duration of 18 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Weekly topotecan at the current schedule in the third-line setting in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent EOC has modest clinical activity. Toxicity associated with this regimen is acceptable but growth factor support, dose reductions, or schedule alterations may need to be considered in many of these patients.     

Phase II evaluation of 24-h continuous infusion topotecan in recurrent, potentially platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer: A Gynecologic Oncology Group study

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to develop an alternative effective and more convenient administration schedule for intravenous topotecan when used as palliative treatment in ovarian cancer. METHODS: The Gynecologic Oncology Group conducted a Phase II trial of 24-h infusional topotecan (8.5 mg/m(2)) with treatment repeated every 3 weeks in 29 patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (prior response to platinum-based chemotherapy with a minimum treatment-free interval >/=6 months). RESULTS: The major toxicities of therapy were grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia which developed in 86 and 14% of patients, respectively. Other severe side effects were uncommon. Only 2 partial responses (7%) were observed in the 28 patients evaluable for response. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the relatively favorable ovarian cancer patient population treated in this trial (platinum-sensitive recurrent disease), the response rate was disappointingly low. Considering the three- to fivefold higher objective response rates observed in other trials employing topotecan in individuals with platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer utilizing a 5-day treatment program (delivered every 3 weeks), the results of the current study provide strong support for the conclusion that clinically relevant antineoplastic activity of this agent is highly schedule dependent.     

Three-consecutive-day topotecan is an active regimen for recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to determine the response rate and toxicity of topotecan administered Days 1-3 every 21 days for recurrent epithelial cancers of the ovary, peritoneum, or fallopian tube. A 3-day regimen may be more convenient and less expensive than a 5-day schedule. METHODS: Patients with recurrent epithelial cancer of the ovary, peritoneum, or fallopian tube who had adequate hepatic, renal, and hematologic function were eligible for participation. Topotecan (2 mg/m(2)) was administered for 3 consecutive days every 21 days. Response was measured clinically and serologically. Granulocyte colony stimulating factors (GCSF) were not utilized prophylactically, but could be added under specific conditions. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients with recurrent ovarian cancer whose median age was 63 (range 32-84) received 165 cycles of topotecan (median = 6; range 2-8) and are evaluable for toxicity. The median number of prior regimens was 1. Topotecan was administered on schedule in 96.6% of cycles. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was seen in 29.1 and 23.6% of courses, respectively; but only 3.4% of cycles required GCSF support (6 cycles for 2 patients). Grade 4 thrombocytopenia was rare (1% of cycles). Nonhematologic toxicity was mild. The response rate for 28 evaluable patients was 32.1% (10.7% complete response (CR) and 21.4% partial response (PR)); stable disease was seen in 17.9% of patients. The median progression-free interval (PFI) for all patients was 15.5 weeks (range 5-40). Eighteen platinum-sensitive patients demonstrated a 43.4% response rate (12.5% CR and 31.3% PR); stable disease was documented in 18.8%. The median PFI for platinum-sensitive patients was 18.5 weeks (range 5-40). CONCLUSION: Topotecan is an effective regimen with acceptable toxicity for recurrent ovarian cancer when administered for 3 consecutive days (2 mg/m(2)) every 21 days. It can be delivered on schedule without GCSF support in the vast majority of patients.     

Phase II trial of topotecan and cisplatin in persistent or recurrent squamous and nonsquamous carcinomas of the cervix

OBJECTIVE: Cisplatin is a standard treatment in advanced, recurrent cervical cancer. Because topotecan is an established treatment in gynecologic malignancies such as ovarian cancer and exhibits nonoverlapping toxicity with cisplatin, a phase II trial was conducted to evaluate the tolerability and antitumor activity of a cisplatin/topotecan doublet in persistent or recurrent cervical cancer patients. METHODS: Patients with bidimensionally measurable persistent or recurrent squamous cell and non squamous cell cervical cancer and adequate bone marrow were enrolled. Patients received 50 mg/m(2) of cisplatin intravenously over 1 h on Day 1 and 0.75 mg/m(2) of topotecan intravenously over 30 min on Days 1, 2, and 3 of 21-day cycles for six cycles or until disease progression. Tumor response and regimen toxicity were assessed using established Gynecologic Oncology Group criteria. RESULTS: Thirty-two of 35 enrolled patients were evaluable for toxicity and tumor response. All but 2 evaluable patients had received previous radiotherapy. No patient received prior chemotherapy. The cisplatin/topotecan doublet was well tolerated, with 77 and 78% of courses given without interruption or delay and at full doses, respectively. As anticipated, the most common toxicity was hematologic, with grade 3/4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia reported in 30 and 10% of cycles, respectively. The overall response rate was 28% (9/32), with 3 complete and 6 partial responses. The antitumor response in nonirradiated fields (30%) was similar to the response observed in previously irradiated fields (33%), suggesting good drug penetration. Median duration of response was 5 months (range, 2 to 15+ months). An additional 9 (28%) patients achieved stable disease. Median survival was 10 months, with 3 patients in lasting remission. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that the cisplatin/topotecan combination is safe, well tolerated, and active in persistent or recurrent cervical cancer patients. A phase III, multicenter trial is under way (cisplatin/topotecan versus cisplatin) based on these favorable results to confirm the safety and efficacy profile in this patient population.     

A new therapeutical approach: topotecan plus gemcitabine in the treatment of patients with relapsed ovarian cancer after failure of first-line chemotherapy with paclitaxel and platinum

AIM: Topotecan and gemcitabine have demonstrated mono-activity against recurrent ovarian cancer. Both drugs affect DNA replication; in addition, topotecan inhibits DNA repair. Based on the efficacy profiles and different mechanisms of action, a phase-I study was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of topotecan (day 1-5) and the dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) in combination with gemcitabine (day 1 + 8) every 21 days. METHODS: Three to six patients were treated per dose-level. Patients with ovarian cancer who had failed a platinum and paclitaxel-containing therapy were enrolled. No individual dose escalation or use of cytokines were allowed. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients were recruited. Fifty percent of all patients were pretreated with at least two platinum-containing therapies. Eighty courses were assessable for toxicity. The MTD was reached at a dosage of 0.75 mg/m2 topotecan in combination with 800/600 mg/m2 gemcitabine. Thrombocytopenia and leucopenia were the major DLTs. The dose for phase-II trials is 0.50 mg/m2 topotecan given with 800/600 mg/m2 gemcitabine. In this dose-level only one related non-haematological adverse event > grade 2 was observed (grade 3 mycotic stomatitis) and one grade 4 thrombocytopenia occurred. Responses were observed in six patients and stable disease in four out of 12 assessable patients. Median survival time was 15.3 (95% CI: 13.21-28.64) months. CONCLUSION: The results demonstrate feasibility and the tolerability of topotecan in combination with gemcitabine in recurrent ovarian cancer patients. Based on these results a phase-II study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of this new combination.     

A dose-escalating study of weekly bolus topotecan in previously treated ovarian cancer patients

OBJECTIVE: Topotecan is an established topoisomerase I inhibitor for the treatment of relapsed ovarian cancer. Myelotoxicity and suboptimal patient convenience associated with daily topotecan, however, have prompted investigators to explore alternate regimens, including a weekly regimen of topotecan. The objective of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of topotecan given as a weekly bolus in previously treated ovarian cancer patients. METHODS: Second- and third-line ovarian cancer patients with measurable disease or elevated cancer antigen 125 received weekly bolus topotecan intravenously starting at 1.5 mg/m(2). Topotecan was escalated in dose increments of 0.5 mg/m(2) every 21 days as tolerability allowed. Dose-limiting toxicity was defined as grade 3/4 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia. RESULTS: Thirty-two of 35 patients were evaluable for safety and tolerability. No notable toxicity was observed with weekly topotecan doses < 4 mg/m(2). Additionally, there was an absence of dose-limiting myelotoxicity and thrombocytopenia with weekly topotecan. The MTD of weekly topotecan without the use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support was 4 mg/m(2), with grade 2 anemia, chronic fatigue, and grade 2 gastrointestinal toxicity limiting further dose escalation. Weekly topotecan also demonstrated antitumor activity at doses >2 mg/m(2). CONCLUSIONS: The establishment of a well-tolerated, weekly regimen of topotecan (4 mg/m(2), with a maximum recommended dose of 6 mg/m(2)) provides the basis for further investigation in phase II studies of single-agent and combination regimens in previously treated ovarian cancer patients.     

Weekly topotecan for recurrent endometrial cancer: a case series and review of the literature

OBJECTIVE: Topotecan, a topoisomerase 1 inhibitor, has demonstrated antitumor activity in ovarian and endometrial cancers when administered daily for 5 days every 3 weeks. Recently, topotecan has been studied on a weekly dosing schedule for the treatment of ovarian cancer and found to have efficacy with reduced toxicity. The aim of this study is to review the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) experience with weekly topotecan dosing in women with recurrent endometrial cancer. We have included a review of the literature of weekly topotecan in the treatment of patients with gynecologic cancer. METHODS: After Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval, we identified all women with recurrent endometrial cancer treated with topotecan at MSKCC from May 1996 to February 2004. Patients treated on a weekly schedule were assessed for toxicity and response. A review of the literature pertaining to weekly topotecan in the treatment of endometrial cancer was also performed. RESULTS: Eleven patients were treated with weekly topotecan during the study period, with doses ranging from 2.5-4.0 mg/m(2) on a 2- or 3-week schedule with 1 week off. The median age of the patients was 60 years old (range, 47-76 years), and the median Karnofsky performance status was 80%. Six of the 11 patients were previously treated with more than three chemotherapy regimens and eight had received prior pelvic radiation. Ninety-seven percent of treatment doses were delivered as scheduled, and only two patients required dose reductions. One patient achieved a prolonged partial response for 54 weeks, and two patients had stabilization of disease for 15 weeks each. CONCLUSIONS: Weekly topotecan has antitumor activity and is well tolerated in patients with recurrent endometrial cancer, including those patients with multiple prior treatments. Topotecan on a weekly bolus schedule should be evaluated in prospective trials to better establish its role in the treatment of recurrent endometrial cancer.     

Phase 2 trial of carboplatin, paclitaxel, and irinotecan in ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancers

OBJECTIVE: Our goal in this nonrandomized phase 2 trial was to evaluate the toxicity and obtain preliminary data on the potential efficacy of a novel three-drug combination regimen (carboplatin-paclitaxel-irinotecan) when employed as initial therapy of advanced ovarian cancer or as second-line treatment in the setting of a prolonged (>or=12 months) treatment-free interval. METHODS: Patients with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of advanced ovarian cancer, primary adenocarcinoma of the peritoneum, or fallopian tube cancer were enrolled in the study. Patients received carboplatin (AUC 5), paclitaxel (150 mg/m(2) over 3 h), and irinotecan (100 mg/m(2) over 90 min). The three-drug combination was initially administered on an every 21-day schedule, but due to toxicity was subsequently changed to a 28-day program. RESULTS: A total of 30 patients were enrolled into this phase 2 trial. Twenty-three patients were chemotherapy naive, while 7 had received prior chemotherapy. Seventeen patients completed all six cycles of treatment. Eight patients (27%) were removed from the study after a median of three cycles due to toxicities. Seventeen patients (57%) experienced grade 4 neutropenia, with three individuals requiring hospitalization for neutropenic fever and dehydration. Grades 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia were experienced by three patients each. The principal nonhematologic toxicities were diarrhea (grade 3: three patients) and fatigue. The overall objective clinical response rate was 83%. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of carboplatin-paclitaxel-irinotecan can be administered to women with advanced ovarian cancer with significant, but overall acceptable toxicity. Modification of the regimen from a 3-week to a 4-week schedule permits a greater percentage of patients to complete the program without experiencing excessive toxicity. The overall objective response rate observed in this trial is comparable to other combination regimens employed in this setting. Defining a place for this three-drug program in the standard management of ovarian cancer will require the conduct of an appropriately designed randomized trial.     

Chemotherapy for recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer previously treated with platinum--a systematic review of the evidence from randomized trials

PURPOSE: To evaluate the chemotherapeutic options for women with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer who have received platinum-based chemotherapy. METHODS: A systematic search of the Medline, CancerLit and Cochrane Library databases was performed for the period from 1984 to June 2001 to find randomized trials comparing second- or higher-line chemotherapy regimens in patients with recurrent platinum-pretreated epithelial ovarian cancer. RESULTS: Seven randomized trials have failed to demonstrate the clear superiority of any one chemotherapy regimen in terms of improvements in long-term survival, quality of life or response rate. One trial detected a statistically significant difference between treatments in progression-free survival, which was longer with cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/cisplatin than with paclitaxel in women with platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer. Another trial did not show a difference between liposomal doxorubicin and topotecan overall in women with recurrent ovarian cancer but a subgroup analysis detected a significant survival advantage for liposomal doxorubicin over topotecan in women with platinum-sensitive disease. CONCLUSION: The evidence available does not support firm conclusions about the preferred chemotherapy regimen for recurrent ovarian cancer. Randomized trials that compare new drugs with current standard treatments are needed.     

Lack of efficacy of 24-h infusional topotecan in platinum-refractory ovarian cancer: A Gynecologic Oncology Group trial

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a more convenient topotecan administration schedule in the second-line treatment of advanced platinum-refractory ovarian cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The Gynecologic Oncology Group conducted a Phase II trial of 24-h infusional topotecan (8.5 mg/m(2)), repeated every 3 weeks in 26 patients with platinum-refractory ovarian cancer (failure to respond to initial platinum-based treatment or development of recurrent disease within 6 months of completion of chemotherapy). RESULTS: Grade 4 neutropenia (85% of patients) and thrombocytopenia (12%) were the major toxicities encountered. Of the 25 patients evaluable for response, only a single patient experienced an objective response (4%). CONCLUSIONS: When employed at this dose and schedule (24-h infusion every 3 weeks), topotecan has minimal second-line activity in platinum-refractory ovarian cancer.