扩展创伤重点超声评估技术在腹部闭合性创伤患者检查中的应用研究

目的探讨扩展创伤重点超声评估技术(EFAST)在腹部闭合性创伤患者检查中的应用价值。方法回顾性分析2017年2月至2018年2月医院腹部闭合性创伤患者156例病历及影像资料,所有患者均行EFAST、CT检查。以手术结果为金标准,比较EFAST、CT、EFAST+CT三种方法诊断效能、检查时间及费用。结果156例患者中,共计检查780个结果。手术结果显示216例脏器损伤脾损伤86例,肝损伤37例,肾脏损伤53例,腹膜血肿22例,胰腺损伤18例。EFAST检出阳性164例,阴性546例;CT检出阳性185例,阴性554例;EFAST+CT检出阳性200例,阴性560例。CT检测灵敏度、准确度高于EFAST;EFAST+CT灵敏度、特异度、准确度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值高于EFAST,灵敏度、准确度、阴性预测值高于CT,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。FAST检查时间短于CT,检查费用低于CT,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论EFAST较CT而言,具有检查时间短、费用低、诊断效能较高的特点,可用于腹部闭合性创伤患者早期检查,联合CT检查能提高腹部闭合性创伤的诊断效能。     

Emergency ultrasound credentialling for focused assessment sonography in trauma and abdominal aortic aneurysm: A practical approach for Australasia

Objective: Focused assessment with sonography for trauma and emergency ultrasound for abdominal aortic aneurysm are now practiced widely by non‐radiologists in emergency departments worldwide. Various credentialling programs have been proposed for novice sonographers; however, their feasibility has been questioned. We adopted the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine (ACEM) credentialling process for emergency ultrasound to determine whether it is feasible for emergency physicians in the Australasian environment. Methods: Three full‐time emergency medicine specialists and a post‐Fellowship Examination trainee at Auckland Hospital undertook the credentialling process. Results: All four participants had sufficient scans to complete the process after 16 months. Accuracy for focused assessment with sonography for trauma, 90% (95% CI 83–95%), and abdominal aortic aneurysm, 99% (95% CI 90–100%), is similar to that previously reported. Conclusion: The ACEM credentialling process for focused assessment with sonography for trauma and abdominal aortic aneurysm is practical and achievable for emergency medicine specialists working in the Emergency Department at Auckland Hospital. Further studies are necessary to determine whether this holds true for other major trauma centres in Australasia.     

The utility of focused assessment with sonography for trauma as a triage tool in multiple-casualty incidents during the second Lebanon war.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) as a triage tool in multiple-casualty incidents (MCIs) for a single international conflict. METHODS: The charts of 849 casualties that arrived at our level 1 trauma referral center were reviewed. Casualties were initially triaged according to the Injury Severity Score at the emergency department gate. Two-hundred eighty-one physically injured patients, 215 soldiers (76.5%) and 66 civilians (23.5%), were admitted. Focused assessment with sonography for trauma was performed in 102 casualties suspected to have an abdominal injury. Sixty-eight underwent computed tomography (CT); 12 underwent laparotomy; and 28 were kept under clinical observation alone. We compared FAST results against CT, laparotomy, and clinical observation records. RESULTS: Focused assessment with sonography for trauma results were positive in 17 casualties and negative in 85. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of FAST were 75%, 97.6%, 88.2%, 94.1%, and 93.1%, respectively. A strong correlation between FAST and CT results, laparotomy, and clinical observation was obtained (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: In a setting of a war conflict-related MCI, FAST enabled immediate triage of casualties to laparotomy, CT, or clinical observation. Because of its moderate sensitivity, a negative FAST result with strong clinical suspicion demands further evaluation, especially in an MCI.     

急诊床旁应用超声FAST方案快速评估多发伤的初步研究

目的 研究急诊床旁应用超声FAST方案快速评估多发伤的临床价值.方法 2008年6月至2009年10月,浙江大学医学院附属第二医院急诊科收治的严重多发伤患者,共97例.男性72例,女性25例.年龄14～88岁,(41±16)岁.损伤严重度评分(ISS)14～38分,(23.2±9.3)分.纳入标准:①年龄≥14岁;②受伤12 h内;③直接进入急诊复苏室.排除标准:①2 d内死亡且未行腹部CT扫描或剖腹探查;②经FAST评估后直接手术治疗而未行常规超声检查.对研究对象的不同评估方法进行前瞻性对照研究.所有病例均由急诊医生应用超声FAST方案进行腹腔及心包评估,部位包括剑突下四腔心切面、右隔下及肝肾间隙、右结肠旁沟、左隔下及脾肾间隙、左结肠旁沟、盆腔,根据有无游离液体判断腹腔及心包是否有损伤.同时与常规超声检查、CT扫描及手术结果进行比较.FAST与常规超声耗时比较用配对资料t检验,两者检查结果一致性用配对McNemar检验,计算FAST与常规超声的特异度、敏感性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值、假阳性率、假阴性率、准确率.两者率的比较用Fisher检验.结果 FAST耗时1～6min,(3.18±0.79)min,显著短于常规超声检查(16.63±4.62)min,(t=28.61,P＜0.01).97例患者中,FAST阳性者11例,阴性者86例,其中4例为假阴性.与常规超声结果比较差异无统计学意义(P=0.5).从诊断效能看,以CT及手术结果作为金标准,FASST的敏感性为73%,特异性为100%,阳性预测值100%,假阳性率为0,阴性预测值为95.3%,假阴性率为4.6%,总准确率为95.9%,与常规超声相比,差异无统计学意义.结论 只要经过适当培训,急诊科医生完全可以掌握FAST技术,对严重创伤患者腹部损伤及心包作出快速准确的判断.     

Clinical predictors of injuries not identified by focused abdominal sonogram for trauma (FAST) examinations

This study's objective was to identify clinical characteristics of patients with a blunt traumatic injury that increased the risk of peritoneal or pericardial fluid collections and abdominal organ injuries not identified by a bedside focused abdominal sonogram for trauma (FAST) examination. This observational study used a retrospective chart review of a cohort of patients identified through a query of the University of Nebraska Medical Center's trauma registry, a tertiary referral center for portions of Nebraska, Iowa, and Missouri. Adult patients presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) for an evaluation of blunt traumatic injury from September 1996 to December 2002 were eligible if their ED course included admission to the trauma service after completion of a bedside FAST examination (US) and a confirmatory study (Conf) such as an abdominopelvic computed tomography scan or exploratory laparotomy within 12 h of completion of the ED FAST examination. The medical records of those patients with a US+/Conf+ or US-/Conf+ examination were reviewed. Clinical characteristics were recorded on a standard data collection form. Statistically significant predictors of a US-/Conf+ examination were found using a stepwise logistic regression procedure. A query of the trauma registry for the study period revealed 1453 adult individuals with blunt abdominal trauma, with 458 patients meeting the inclusion criteria. The clinical characteristics of the 79 US+/Conf+ examinations were compared to those of the 53 US-/Conf+ examinations. The presence of a radiographically proven pelvic fracture (odds ratio 3.459; 95% confidence interval of 1.308-9.157) and a radiographically or operatively proven renal injury (odds ratio 3.667; 95% confidence interval of 1.013-13.275) were found to be significant predictors. The presence of a pelvic fracture or renal injury in adult victims of blunt abdominal trauma increases the likelihood of a US-/Conf+ examination. Patients with a negative FAST examination and pelvic fracture may benefit from additional radiographic or operative evaluations for occult injuries.     

Experience with focused abdominal sonography for trauma (FAST) in 313 pediatric patients

PURPOSE: The use of focused abdominal sonography for trauma (FAST), which detects free fluid in the abdomen and pelvis, for the assessment of blunt abdominal trauma is gaining acceptance worldwide and has been described extensively in the general medical literature. The precise application of this technique in pediatric patients, however, has yet to be established. The aim of this study was to assess the utility of FAST in pediatric trauma patients by comparing the results of this technique with those of CT and explorative laparotomy (ELAP). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records and sonographic examinations of pediatric patients who had sustained multiple traumatic injuries for which they were treated at our hospital during a 20-month period. For all patients, FAST had been the initial screening examination for blunt abdominal trauma. We compared the FAST findings, which had been recorded as positive or negative, with the findings on CT or ELAP, which were considered definitive. RESULTS: A total of 313 patients (204 boys and 109 girls) with a mean age of 7.1 years were included in the study. The FAST finding had been negative in 274 patients, of whom 201 had had no clinical signs of abdominal injury and had been managed conservatively without complications. CT had been performed in 109 patients and ELAP in 11. FAST had yielded 3 false-negative and 2 false-positive results. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of FAST were 92.5%, 97.2%, and 95.5%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: FAST is an effective tool in screening pediatric trauma patients for blunt abdominal trauma.     

Active abdominal bleeding: contrast-enhanced sonography

Active contrast medium extravasation is a recognized and important angiographic and computed tomographic (CT) sign of bleeding. It is an indicator of active, ongoing, and potentially life-threatening hemorrhage and, hence, of the need for an immediate surgical or interventional treatment. Sonography (US) is frequently used as the first imaging option for screening patients with traumatic and nontraumatic abdominal emergencies. Owing to the current possibilities of low-mechanical index, real-time, contrast-specific systems, it is now possible to detect a contrast leakage by using US. This finding opens new possibilities in the assessment and management of several abdominal emergencies, including trauma (initial workup and monitoring), spontaneous hematomas, and rupture of aneurysms or masses. This article describes the technique, findings, possibilities, and limitations of contrast-enhanced US in the evaluation of active abdominal bleeding.     

Blunt hepatic trauma: evaluation with contrast-enhanced sonography: sonographic findings and clinical application.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to report our initial experience in the assessment of liver trauma with real-time contrast-enhanced sonography (CES). METHODS: From January 2000 to December 2003, there were 431 hemodynamically stable patients evaluated with sonography for blunt abdominal trauma. Among these patients, 87 were selected to undergo second-level imaging, consisting of CES and computed tomographic (CT) evaluation. Indications for further assessment were baseline sonographic findings positive for liver injury, baseline sonographic findings positive for injury to other abdominal parenchyma, baseline sonographic findings positive for free fluid only, baseline sonographic findings indeterminate, and baseline sonographic findings negative with persistent clinical or laboratory suspicion. RESULTS: There were 23 hepatic lesions shown by CT in 21 patients. Peritoneal or retroperitoneal fluid was identified in 19 of 21 positive cases by all 3 imaging modalities. Liver injury was found in 15 patients on sonography and in 19 on CES. Contrast-enhanced sonography compared better than unenhanced sonography with the criterion standard for related injury conspicuity, injury size, completeness of injury extension, and involvement of the liver capsule. Both CES and CT showed intrahepatic contrast material pooling in 2 cases. All patients with false-negative sonographic or CES findings recovered uneventfully. CONCLUSIONS: Contrast-enhanced sonography is an effective tool in the evaluation of blunt hepatic trauma, being more sensitive than baseline sonography and correlating better than baseline sonography with CT findings. In institutions where sonography is regarded as the initial procedure to screen patients with trauma, this technique may increase its effectiveness. In addition, CES may be valuable in the follow-up of patients with conservatively treated liver trauma.     

Screening sonography in pregnant patients with blunt abdominal trauma.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of screening sonography for the detection of clinically significant abdominal injury in pregnant patients with blunt trauma. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 5173 patients with blunt abdominal trauma who underwent screening sonography. Pregnant patients were identified, and the prospective sonographic interpretations were compared with surgical findings, computed tomography (CT), subsequent sonography, cystography, and the clinical course. RESULTS: Of 1567 female patients with trauma, 947 were of reproductive age and, 102 (11%) of these 947 were pregnant. One patient was excluded because a truth standard was not available. Five (5%) of these 101 patients were found to have injuries at surgery. These injuries involved the placenta (2 injuries), spleen (2 injuries), liver (1 injury), and kidney (1 injury); all required surgery. Initial sonographic findings were positive in 4 of 5 patients with injuries. The missed injury was a placental injury detected 15 hours after screening sonography because of fetal bradycardia. After screening sonography, 6 patients underwent additional abdominal imaging: CT (3 patients), cystography (1 patient), and additional sonography (2 patients). Of 101 patients, 95 (94%) required no additional tests, and 97 (96%) required no test involving ionizing radiation. No pregnant patient underwent diagnostic peritoneal lavage. Sensitivity was 80% (95% confidence interval, 28%-100%), and specificity was 100% (96 of 96; 95% confidence interval, 96%-100%) for detecting major abdominal injury. CONCLUSIONS: Sonography is an effective screening examination that can obviate more hazardous tests such as CT, cystography, and peritoneal lavage in most pregnant patients with trauma requiring objective evaluation of the abdomen.     

Sonographic patterns of intraperitoneal hemorrhage associated with blunt splenic injury.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the correlation between sonographic detection of free fluid in the left upper quadrant and blunt splenic injury. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of all consecutive emergency blunt trauma sonograms obtained at a level I trauma center from January 1995 to January 2001. Data were collected on demographics, free fluid location, and patient outcome. Injuries were determined from computed tomography, diagnostic peritoneal lavage, laparotomy, or a combination thereof. RESULTS: A total of 4320 blunt trauma sonograms were obtained, and 596 patients (14%) had intra-abdominal injuries. The mean age was 33.7 +/- 19.1 years (range, 1-95 years), with 294 (49%) male and 302 (51%) female. There was no statistical difference between age, sex, or mechanism for all subgroups. There were 409 true-positive, 187 false-negative, 88 false-positive, and 3636 true-negative findings. Sensitivity of sonography for detecting all intra-abdominal injuries was 68%, and specificity was 97.6%; sensitivity for detecting isolated splenic injuries was 73.8%. Locations of free fluid in patients with nonsplenic injuries were compared with those in patients with splenic injuries. Isolated left upper quadrant free fluid was significantly associated with splenic injury (odds ratio = 3.0; P = .002), followed by diffuse free fluid (odds ratio = 2.1; P = .005). A subanalysis of isolated splenic injuries also revealed a significant association with left upper quadrant free fluid (odds ratio = 3.1; P = .007) and diffuse free fluid (odds ratio = 2.7; P = .0007). CONCLUSIONS: Free fluid in the left upper quadrant is significantly associated with splenic injury. This finding should triage patients more rapidly to computed tomography, angiography, embolization, and laparotomy.     

The Focused Abdominal Sonography for Trauma (FAST) Examination: Considerations and Recommendations for Training Physicians in the Use of a New Clinical Tool

Focused abdominal sonography for trauma (FAST) is being used by growing numbers of emergency physicians and surgeons because it has proven to be an accurate, rapid, and repeatable bedside test for evaluating abdominal trauma victims. Controversy exists about the optimal means of FAST education and the number of examinations necessary to demonstrate competency. Most FAST educators agree that FAST education should consist of three phases: didactic, practical, and experiential. This article summarizes options and preliminary recommendations suitable for developing a FAST curriculum.     

Evaluation of extremity trauma with sonography.

OBJECTIVE: To report on the use of bedside sonography in the diagnosis and treatment of penetrating extremity trauma. METHODS: Sonography was performed in the emergency department of a level 1 trauma center with both curved and linear array transducers. RESULTS: In both cases, foreign bodies and fractures resulting from gunshot wounds to the extremities were found. In addition, intra-abdominal and thoracic injuries were evaluated for using sonography. CONCLUSIONS: The increasing mobility and portability of sonography has led to its increasing use at the patient' bedside to diagnose a variety of conditions. It provides potential immediate diagnosis and has the flexibility for evaluating a multitude of injuries normally requiring several different imaging technologies. In circumstances in which conventional radiography is unavailable, such as at trauma scenes, mass casualty situations, or at the bedside with unstable patients, sonography can provide unique and essential information about these patients.     

Sonographic assessment of blunt abdominal trauma: a 4-year prospective study

PURPOSE: Emergency abdominal sonography has become a common modality worldwide in the evaluation of injuries caused by blunt trauma. The sensitivity of sonography in the detection of hemoperitoneum varies, and little is known about the accuracy of sonography in the detection of injuries to specific organs. The purpose of this study was to determine the overall accuracy of sonography in the detection of hemoperitoneum and solid-organ injury caused by blunt trauma. METHODS: From January 1995 to October 1998, 3,264 patients underwent emergency sonography at our institution to evaluate for free fluid and parenchymal abnormalities of specific organs caused by blunt trauma. All patients with intra-abdominal injuries (IAIs) were identified, and their sonographic findings were compared with their CT and operative findings, as well as their clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Three hundred ninety-six (12%) of the 3,264 patients had IAIs. Sonography detected free fluid presumed to represent hemoperitoneum in 288 patients (9%). The sonographic detection of free fluid alone had a 60% sensitivity, 98% specificity, 82% positive predictive value, and 95% negative predictive value for diagnosing IAI. The accuracy was 94%. Seventy patients (2%) had parenchymal abnormalities identified with sonography that corresponded to actual organ injuries. The sensitivity of the sonographic detection of free fluid and/or parenchymal abnormalities in diagnosing IAI was 67%. CONCLUSIONS: Emergency sonography to evaluate patients for injury caused by blunt trauma is highly accurate and specific. The sonographic detection of free fluid is only moderately sensitive for diagnosing IAI, but the combination of free fluid and/or a parenchymal abnormality is more sensitive.     

The impact of routine admission abdominal sonography on patient care

In a prospective study of 1000 consecutive patients, abdominal sonography added diagnostic information to that available by history and physical examination in 8.9%. The yield ranged from a high of 27.4% in patients with acute abdominal symptoms to a low of 2.7% in screening sonograms of patients without abdominal symptoms. Sonographically guided biopsy-proven diagnoses were obtained in 6.6% of the patients and were clinically not suspected in 4.4%. The percentage of false-positive and false-negative sonographic studies was 0.5% and 1.1%, respectively. Sonography shortened the duration of hospitalization in 15.3%.     

Reevaluation of ultrasonography for solid-organ injury in blunt abdominal trauma.

OBJECTIVE: To reevaluate the usefulness of ultrasonography for detecting and classifying solid-organ injuries from blunt abdominal trauma by comparing ultrasonography with computed tomography (CT) and laparotomy. METHODS: Six hundred four patients with blunt abdominal trauma were examined by both B-mode ultrasonography and CT for a study period of 14 years. The ultrasonographic examiners were divided into 2 groups depending on their experience with ultrasonography. The ultrasonographic results were then compared with CT and surgical findings. This was a retrospective study. RESULTS: In 198 patients, solid-organ injuries were identified on CT, laparotomy, or both. Sensitivity values in group A (experts) were 87.5% for hepatic injuries, 85.4% for splenic injuries, 77.6% for renal injuries, and 44.4% for pancreatic injuries. Sensitivity values in group B were 46.2% for hepatic injuries, 50.0% for splenic injuries, and 44.1% for renal injuries. The detection rates in group A were 80% to 100% for different types of hepatic injuries except superficial injuries (20%) and 70% to 100% for different types of splenic injuries. The detection rates for renal parenchymal and pancreatic duct injuries were 53.3% and 80%, respectively. The detection rates for injuries requiring intervention were 86.1% in group A and 66.7% in group B. CONCLUSIONS: The sensitivity of ultrasonography with the use of CT and surgical findings as reference standards decreased compared with our prior study. However, ultrasonography was found to enable experienced examiners to detect and classify parenchymal injuries efficiently, despite disadvantages in detecting superficial and vascular injuries. Ultrasonography should be used to explore not only free fluid but also solid-organ injuries.     

Extended field-of-view sonography: advantages in abdominal applications.

OBJECTIVE: To show the advantages of extended field-of-view sonography in abdominal applications. METHODS: Thirty-one cases were prospectively analyzed in our study. Extended field-of-view images were obtained when the radiologist decided that they would offer potential advantages for the examination. When extended field-of-view scanning was used, the radiologist determined prospectively whether it was useful according to several categories. Images were obtained with a 2- to 5-MHz curved array transducer or 4- to 9- and 5- to 12-MHz linear array transducers. RESULTS: Extended field-of-view sonography provided several potential benefits over conventional sonography in the abdominal area. The advantages of extended field-of-view sonography were better demonstration of the spatial relationship between lesions and adjacent normal structures in 18 cases (58%), accurate quantification of sizes or volumes of large organs or lesions in 16 (52%), better display of the extended and tubular structures in 6 (19%), usefulness for clinical consultations in 7 (23%), and documentation comparable with that of computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging in 10 (32%). CONCLUSIONS: Extended field-of-view sonography provided the anatomic context of the lesion in its surroundings and allowed precise measurement and tracing of the extended and tubular structures. The method has notable advantages and clinical applications.     

Prevalence,documentation, and communication of incidental findings in focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) examinations

BackgroundAs the focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) examination becomes increasingly ubiquitous in the emergency department (ED), a parallel increase in incidental findings can also be expected. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence, documentation, and communication of incidental findings on emergency physician-performed FAST examinations.MethodsRetrospective review at two academic EDs. Adult trauma patients undergoing FAST examinations used for clinical decision-making at the bedside were identified from an ED ultrasound image archival system. Expert sonologists reviewed ultrasound images for incidental findings, as well as electronic medical records for demographic information, mechanism of injury, type of incidental findings, documentation of incidental findings, and communication of incidental findings to the patient.ResultsA total of 1,452 FAST examinations were reviewed. One hundred and thirty-seven patients with incidental findings were identified (9.4%); 7 patients had an additional incidental finding. Renal cysts were most common (49/144, 34.0%), followed by pelvic cysts in women (32/144, 22.2%). While 31/144 (21.5%) incidental findings were identified and documented in the ultrasound reports or medical records by ED providers, only 6/137 (4.4%) patients were noted to be informed of their incidental findings.ConclusionIncidental findings were often encountered in FAST examinations, with cysts of the kidneys and pelvis being the most common findings. A vast majority of incidental findings were not documented or noted to be communicated to patients, which can be a barrier to follow-up care.     

Mesenteric injury caused by minor blunt abdominal trauma

The authors present an unusual case of mesenteric injury caused by minor blunt abdominal trauma and also provide a review of the literature.     

Residents Should Not Independently Perform Focused Abdominal Sonography for Trauma After 10 Training Examinations

Objectives. To assess whether 10 focused abdominal sonography for trauma (FAST) examinations could be used as a minimum standard for training, as suggested previously. Methods. This was a retrospective review of patients with abdominal trauma who underwent resident‐performed FAST examinations before surgical or Department of Radiology evaluation. Results. Six hundred ninety‐eight patients were examined by resident‐performed FAST followed by reference standard evaluations. Four hundred twelve patients were evaluated by residents who previously performed 10 FAST examinations; 154 were evaluated by 29 residents performing their 11th through 30th examinations; and 258 were evaluated by 10 residents performing their 31st and subsequent examinations. The results of resident‐performed FAST for intraperitoneal free fluid were as follows: 11 to 20 examinations—sensitivity, 73.9% (95% confidence interval, 51.3%–88.9%); specificity, 98.8% (92.5%–99.9%); true‐positive findings, 17; true‐negative, 81; false‐positive, 1; false‐negative, 6; total patients, 105; 21 to 30 examinations—sensitivity, 100% (73.2%–100%); specificity, 97.1% (83.3%–99.9%); true‐positive, 14; true‐negative, 34; false‐positive, 1; false‐negative, 0; total patients, 49; 31 and more examinations—sensitivity, 94.8% (88.6%–97.9%); specificity, 98.6% (94.5%–99.8%); true‐positive, 110; true‐negative, 140; false‐positive, 2; false‐negative, 6; total patients, 258. Conclusions. The suggestion that 10 examinations could be used as a minimum standard for training in FAST examinations was not validated.     

Splenic trauma: evaluation with contrast-specific sonography and a second-generation contrast medium: preliminary experience.

OBJECTIVE: To report our experience in the assessment of splenic trauma with contrast-coded sonography and a second-generation contrast medium. METHODS: From January to May 2002, 120 patients were studied with sonography for suspected splenic trauma. Twenty-five were selected for further imaging because of sonographic findings positive for splenic injury, findings positive for peritoneal fluid only, indeterminate findings, and negative findings with high clinical or laboratory suspicion. These patients underwent contrast-enhanced harmonic sonography and contrast-enhanced helical computed tomography. RESULTS: Among the 25 patients studied, 6 had no spleen trauma at initial and follow-up evaluation. One patient had a hypoperfused spleen without parenchymal damage, and 18 had splenic injuries; these 19 patients were considered positive. Hemoperitoneum was identified by sonography, contrast-enhanced sonography, and contrast-enhanced computed tomography in 74% of the 19 positive cases. Perisplenic clots were recognized in 58% of the cases by computed tomography and in 42% by baseline and enhanced sonography. Splenic infarctions were found in 11% of cases by contrast-enhanced sonography and computed tomography; none was found by unenhanced sonography. Parenchymal traumatic lesions were identified in 12 of 18 patients with splenic injuries by unenhanced sonography, in 17 cases by contrast-enhanced sonography, and in all 18 cases by contrast-enhanced computed tomography. A minimal splenic lesion was found in the single patient with a false-negative contrast-enhanced sonographic finding. Contrast-enhanced sonography correlated appreciably better than unenhanced sonography in detecting injuries and in estimating their extent. Findings undetectable on unenhanced sonography were also noted: splenic hypoperfusion in 11% of positive cases on both contrast-enhanced sonography and contrast-enhanced computed tomography, contrast medium pooling in 21% of cases on both contrast-enhanced sonography and computed tomography, and contrast extravasation in 11% of cases on computed tomography and 5% on contrast-enhanced sonography. CONCLUSIONS: Contrast-enhanced sonography is a promising tool in the assessment of splenic trauma. In institutions where sonography is used as the initial procedure, this technique may increase its effectiveness.