Primary immunosuppression with tacrolimus in kidney transplantation: three-year follow-up in a single center

INTRODUCTION: The 1-year results of the phase III US Multicenter Trial comparing tacrolimus- and cyclosporine (Sandimmun)-based immunosuppressive therapy in kidney transplantation revealed a significant reduction in the incidence and severity of acute rejection episodes among patients maintained on tacrolimus. This retrospective, nonrandomized, single-center study represented 3-year data for patient and graft survival and safety in the tacrolimus-treated patients. METHODS: Among 97 consecutive kidney transplant recipients 41 who received tacrolimus and 56 cyclosporine-based immunosuppression were followed for 3 years for patient and graft survivals and for the incidence of acute rejection episodes as well as serious adverse events. RESULTS: The 3-year patient and graft survival rates for tacrolimus and cyclosporine were similar (91.0% vs 90.2%, 96.5% vs 95.0%). However, the incidence of acute rejection episodes was significantly lower in the tacrolimus (17.1%) compared with the cyclosporine group (35.7%, P = .043). There was a higher incidence of headache, posttransplant diabetes, and alopecia reported in the tacrolimus group, whereas hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, and hirsutism were more frequent in the cyclosporine group. The incidences of hand tremor, hyperkalemia, and viral infections were comparable in both groups. Two patients in the tacrolimus group were converted to cyclosporine due to nephrotoxicity and posttransplant diabetes, respectively, whereas 12 patients in the cyclosporine group were converted to tacrolimus as rescue therapy for acute rejection (41.7%), gingival hyperplasia (33.3%), nephrotoxicity (8.3%), neurotoxicity (8.3%), and hirsutism (8.3%), respectively. CONCLUSION: The 3-year results of tacrolimus treatment show excellent efficacy and safety in kidney transplantation. Due to different side-effect profiles, it is necessary to develop individualized immunosuppressive strategies in kidney transplant recipients.     

Glucose metabolism in the first 3 years after renal transplantation in patients receiving tacrolimus versus cyclosporine-based immunosuppression.

The long-term effects of tacrolimus and cyclosporine on pancreatic islet cell function in renal transplant recipients are unclear. Therefore, a prospective, randomized, longitudinal study was performed that compared glucose metabolism in adult kidney allograft recipients on tacrolimus versus cyclosporine-based immunosuppression. Twenty-three white renal allograft recipients, randomized for either therapy with cyclosporine or tacrolimus, underwent intravenous glucose tolerance tests 6 times during the first 3 yr after transplantation. Concomitant therapy (low-dose steroids and azathioprine) was the same in both groups. Insulin sensitivity index (kG), insulin resistance (insulin/glucose ratio and homeostasis model assessment), and C-peptide and insulin secretion were calculated. Trough levels of tacrolimus and cyclosporine were measured. The occurrence of posttransplantation diabetes mellitus was prospectively monitored. Statistical analysis was performed by ANOVA for repeated measures, and parametric and nonparametric tests were also performed. Although only one patient treated with cyclosporine developed posttransplantation diabetes mellitus, kG levels were below normal in up to one-third of both patients who received tacrolimus and cyclosporine. The only significant difference between patients who received tacrolimus and those who received cyclosporine was in pancreatic secretion capacity at week 3 after transplantation, when the increment of C-peptide secretion was 57% lower and the increment of insulin secretion was 48% lower for patients receiving tacrolimus. In both groups, from week 3 to month 6, there was a tendency toward an increase in kG, despite a significant increase in fasting glucose and insulin resistance calculated by homeostasis model assessment. After month 6, there were no significant changes in any of the parameters of glucose metabolism, indicating that long-term use of either tacrolimus or cyclosporine does not cause chronic, cumulative pancreatic toxicity.     

Blood eosinophilia in tacrolimus-treated patients: an indicator of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia

BACKGROUND: Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PcP) in immunocompromised patients is suggested if the following symptoms develop: dyspnea, fever, and interstitial infiltrates on chest x-ray. We observed a significant blood eosinophilia in kidney recipients with PcP under immunosuppressive treatment with tacrolimus. METHODS: Blood eosinophil counts of kidney recipients under immunosuppression with tacrolimus suffering from PcP were compared to eosinophil counts of patients without evidence of PcP and to patients showing PcP under immunosuppression with cyclosporine. RESULTS: PcP-positive patients treated with tacrolimus showed a significantly higher blood eosinophil count compared to PcP-positive patients treated with cyclosporine (P=0.01), and to patients under immunosuppression with tacrolimus without PcP, respectively (P=0.006). Eosinophilia preceded the time of a definitive PcP diagnosis by bronchoalveolar lavage and decreased after successful treatment. CONCLUSIONS: An increasing blood eosinophil count can be an indicator of P. carinii pneumonia in patients under immunosuppressive therapy with tacrolimus.     

A long-term comparison of tacrolimus (FK506) and cyclosporine in kidney transplantation: evidence for improved allograft survival at five years

BACKGROUND: The 1-year results of the Phase III U.S. Multicenter Trial comparing tacrolimus (FK506)- and cyclosporine (CsA)-based immunosuppressive therapy in kidney transplantation revealed a significant reduction in the incidence and severity of acute rejection episodes among patients maintained on tacrolimus. The present report at 5 years of follow-up focuses on the long-term impact of tacrolimus treatment on kidney allograft outcome. METHODS: The study protocol permitted crossover of patients to the alternate treatment arm under stringent conditions. The effect of crossover on graft survival was analyzed. Cardiovascular risk factors and serious adverse events were also monitored over 5 years. RESULTS: Intent-to-treat analysis revealed equivalent patient and graft survival between treatment arms at 5 years of follow-up (79.1% vs. 81.4%; P=0.472 and 64.3% vs. 61.6%; P=0.558 among tacrolimus and CsA-treated patients, respectively). However, the rate of crossover was significantly higher among patients randomized to receive CsA-based therapy (27.5% vs. 9.3%; P<0.001). The incidence of treatment failure (43.8% vs. 56.3%; P=0.008) was significantly lower among tacrolimus-treated patients. Graft survival was significantly improved in the tacrolimus treatment arm when crossover due to rejection was counted as graft failure (63.8% vs. 53.8%; P=0.014). Tacrolimus therapy was also associated with a significantly reduced requirement for medications to control hypertension and hyperlipidemia. There was a substantial rate of reversal of tacrolimus-associated insulin dependence. CONCLUSION: Tacrolimus-based therapy resulted in significantly reduced risk of graft failure, without an increase in the incidence of adverse events associated with long-term immunosuppression.     

Results of a two-center study comparing hepatic fibrosis progression in HCV-positive liver transplant patients receiving cyclosporine or tacrolimus

A 2-center retrospective analysis was performed in 60 patients undergoing liver transplantation for hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related disease (cyclosporine in 20, tacrolimus in 40). Mean (±SEM) follow-up was 23.6 ± 22.5 and 22.3 ± 13.7 months in patients receiving cyclosporine or tacrolimus, respectively. Clinically indicated biopsies were performed in 15/20 cyclosporine patients (75%) and 22/40 tacrolimus patients (55%; P = .17). The Ishak fibrosis score was significantly lower in cyclosporine-treated patients versus tacrolimus-treated patients (mean 1.7 ± 0.4 vs 3.1 ± 0.4; P = .023), as was percentage of fibrosis grade Ishak ≥4 (7% vs 41%; P = .028). The mean time to moderate fibrosis (Ishak score ≥3) was 38.2 ± 15.1 months in cyclosporine patients (4/15) and 23.5 ± 12.6 months in tacrolimus patients (14/22); the difference was not statistically significant (P = .09). This retrospective study suggests that cyclosporine-based immunosuppression is associated with less severe hepatic fibrosis in HCV-positive liver transplant recipients compared with tacrolimus-based regimens, but a larger prospective comparative trial is necessary to confirm these findings.     

他克莫司与环孢素A在高致敏肾移植受者中的应用比较

目的 观察和比较高致敏肾移植受者应用他克莫司(FK506)与环孢素A(CsA)的有效性和安全性.方法 根据术后免疫抑制方案的不同,将147例高致敏肾移植受者(其中术前群体反应性抗体＞50%的首次肾移植受者59例,2次肾移植受者88例)分为FK506组(53例)和CsA组(94例),两组的免疫抑制方案分别为FK506(或CsA)+霉酚酸酯+泼尼松.观察并分析两组受者术后移植肾存活率、血肌酐水平以及并发症的发生率.结果 FK506组术后1、3和5年的移植肾存活率(86.8%、82.3%和75.3%)略高于CsA组(81.9%、75.4%和66.9%),但差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05);FK506组术后1年时血肌酐水平为(100.72±15.88)μmol/L,CsA组为(117.29±11.77)μmol/L,两组比较,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.01);FK506组与CsA组相比,术后急性排斥反应、慢性排斥反应、肝功能损害、高血压和高血脂的发生率显著降低(P＜0.05),而高血糖的发生率明显升高(P＜0.01),两组移植肾功能延迟恢复和感染的发生率无明显差异(P＞0.05).结论 FK506与CsA相比,能有效降低高致敏受者肾移植术后急、慢性排斥反应的发生率,减少术后并发症的发生,提高移植肾的长期存活率,对高致敏肾移植受者是非常有效和安全的.     

Tacrolimus compared with cyclosporine microemulsion in primary simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation: the EURO-SPK 3-year results

This 3-year study compared tacrolimus versus cyclosporine (CsA) microemulsion (ME) in conjunction with rATG induction, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and short-term corticosteroids in primary simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplantation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This large, prospective, multicenter study was conducted in 10 European centers and one center in Israel. Of the 205 SPK transplants performed from 1998 to 2000, 103 patients were randomly assigned to tacrolimus and 102 to CsA ME. All patients received concomitant rATG induction therapy, MMF, and short-term corticosteroids. RESULTS: In total, 36.9% patients receiving tacrolimus and 57.8% receiving CsA ME discontinued treatment (P = .003). Although 3-year patient and kidney graft survival rates were similar in both groups, pancreas survival was superior with tacrolimus (89.2% versus 72.4%; P = .002). Thrombosis resulted in pancreatic allograft loss in 10 patients receiving CsA ME and in 2 treated with tacrolimus (P = .02). The first episode of biopsy-proven rejection was moderate or severe in 1 of 31 tacrolimus-treated patients and 11 of 39 patients receiving CsA ME (P = .009). Overall adverse event frequency was similar in both groups, but surgical events were lower in the tacrolimus treated group. CONCLUSION: Tacrolimus was more effective than CsA-ME to prevent moderate or severe kidney or pancreas rejection after SPK transplantation. It also provided superior pancreatic graft survival and reduced the risk of pancreas thrombosis.     

Effect of calcineurin inhibitors on survival and histologic disease severity in HCV-infected liver transplant recipients.

The severity of recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) is likely related to several factors. Controversial results have been reported regarding the effect of specific calcineurin-inhibitors. The aim of this research was to determine whether there are differences on posttransplantation outcome in HCV-infected patients based on initial immunosuppression. Prospective randomized trial comparing tacrolimus vs. cyclosporine-based immunosuppression in a cohort of patients undergoing primary orthotopic liver transplantation between 2001 and 2003 was used. Yearly biopsies were performed. Patients with at least 1 protocol biopsy and those with very severe recurrence despite a follow-up of less than 1 yr (cholestatic hepatitis, progression to bridging fibrosis/cirrhosis) were included. Baseline characteristics (demographics, liver function at transplantation, genotype distribution, donor, surgery, immunosuppression except for the type of calcineurin inhibitor) did not differ between the 2 groups. Severe disease (defined as bridging fibrosis, cirrhosis, cholestatic hepatitis, and/or death due to recurrent disease in the first year) was present in 27 in 90 (30%), and was equally distributed in the cyclosporine and tacrolimus groups (15/46 vs. 12/44, respectively). A total of 33 in 90 (37%) patients had no fibrosis in the first year biopsy with no difference between the cyclosporine and tacrolimus groups (36.5 vs. 37%). The percentage of patients developing recurrent acute hepatitis was also similar (32% vs 35%); time to acute hepatitis though was shorter in the tacrolimus group (59 days [35-185] vs. 92 days [39-343] in the cyclosporin group; P = 0.02). Cholestatic hepatitis was observed in 4 of 44 and 5 of 46 patients under cyclosporine and tacrolimus, respectively (P = not significant). In conclusions, the short-term posttransplantation course of hepatitis C is not related to the calcineurin inhibitor used.     

A randomized, prospective, pharmacoeconomic trial of neoral 2-hour postdose concentration monitoring versus tacrolimus trough concentration monitoring in de novo liver transplant recipients.

Two-hour postdose cyclosporine (C2) monitoring is becoming an accepted method of therapeutic drug monitoring, although it is not known whether C2 monitoring is superior to tacrolimus (FK)-based immunosuppression. The purpose of this trial was to compare the safety, efficacy, and pharmacoeconomics of cyclosporine A (CsA) monitored by C2 levels versus FK monitored by trough levels in de novo liver transplant recipients. After informed consent, 60 de novo liver transplant recipients were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to receive either FK (trough, 6-10 ng/mL) or CsA (C2, 600-1200 ng/mL) and corticosteroids. The 2 groups were similar for gender, race, indication for liver disease, and age. At 1 year, patient survival was similar (93% for FK versus 90% for C2). One patient in the FK arm was retransplanted because of recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV). Early acute rejection occurred in 27% of FK-treated patients and 23% of CsA-treated recipients [P = not significant (NS)]. Recurrent HCV occurred in 21% of FK-treated patients and 61% of CsA-treated patient (P = 0.04). The incidence of other infections, new onset diabetes mellitus, requirement for antihypertensives, and requirement for cholesterol medications were similar between the groups. Annual calcineurin inhibitor costs were lower in the C2 arm ($5432 +/- 2091 for C2 versus $8291 +/- 3948 for FK, P = 0.001). Annual pretransplant drug costs ($2292 +/- 2331 for C2 versus $2831 +/- 2358 for FK, P = NS) and 1-year posttransplant drug costs ($17,214 +/- 16,600 for C2 versus $15,151 +/- 11,699 for FK, P = NS) were similar. In conclusion, immunosuppression with CsA, monitored by C2 levels, is safe, effective, and economical in liver transplant recipients and provides immunosuppression at least equivalent to that of FK.     

Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation in a large multicenter study: surgical complications

Simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplantation has evolved as an effective treatment modality for patients with end-stage nephropathy owing to type 1 diabetes mellitus. This kidney-pancreas transplant procedure includes a number of risks, one of them being surgical complications, which were analyzed in this large prospective multicenter study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The analysis included 205 patients randomly assigned to tacrolimus (n = 103) or cyclosporine ME (n = 102) in the Euro-SPK001 study. Surgical complications were defined as any intervention in the postoperative course related to the transplant procedure. RESULTS: The number of patients undergoing relaparotomy was significantly lower among the tacrolimus group (26.2%) as compared to the cyclosporine ME group (43.1%, P = .0109). Relaparotomy was performed earlier in the cyclosporine ME group (day 14 +/- 17) compared to patients in the tacrolimus group (day 26 +/- 26, P = .0506). Graft vessel thrombosis, intra-abdominal hemorrhage, and enteric or ureteral leakage within the first 3 months occurred significantly more frequently in cyclosporine ME-treated patients. Donor age above 45 years showed a negative impact on surgical complications. Relaparotomy had no impact on patient survival but significantly affected pancreas and kidney graft survival in both groups. CONCLUSION: This prospective, randomized, multicenter trial in patients undergoing primary SPK demonstrated a benefit of tacrolimus over cyclosporine ME with regard to the incidence of surgical complications and, consecutively, to kidney and pancreas graft survival.     

Cyclosporine and long-term kidney graft survival

BACKGROUND: Previous analysis of kidney transplant data from the Collaborative Transplant Study database showed that patients receiving cyclosporine 3-6 mg/kg/day 1 year posttransplantation had the best graft survival rate 7 years posttransplantation. Longer-term and additional analyses have now been performed. METHODS: Data from cadaver kidney transplants performed between 1985 and 1998 were analyzed retrospectively. Patients were included if they had a functioning graft 1 year posttransplantation, and the daily cyclosporine dose administered 1 year posttransplantation was reported. Data on cyclosporine dose, serum creatinine concentration, and systolic blood pressure were recorded 1 and 5 years after transplantation; information on graft survival was documented at yearly intervals. RESULTS: Patients receiving cyclosporine 3-6 mg/kg/day 1 year posttransplantation had the best graft survival rate 10 years posttransplantation. Cyclosporine <2 mg/kg/day was least beneficial overall and in subanalyses based on age, risk level, and 1-year serum creatinine concentration. The microemulsion cyclosporine formulation (Neoral) was associated with a significantly higher 4-year graft survival rate than the conventional formulation (Sandimmune; P=0.0001). Median systolic blood pressure 5 years posttransplantation was similar in each 1-year cyclosporine dose category (range of medians 139.0-140.0 mmHg). The percentages of patients with serum creatinine concentrations of <130, 130-260, 260-400, or >400 micromol/L 1 and 5 years posttransplantation were similar across 1-year cyclosporine dose categories, with the exception of >6 mg/kg/day, where there was a shift toward a less favorable serum creatinine concentration over time. CONCLUSIONS: The 1-year cyclosporine dose was significantly associated with long-term graft survival, with evidence of underimmunosuppression at doses <3 mg/kg/day and overimmunosuppression at doses >6 mg/kg/day, but had little influence on systolic blood pressure or serum creatinine concentration at doses up to 6 mg/kg/day.     

Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus compared with cyclosporine microemulsion in primary simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation: 1-year results of a large multicenter trial

BACKGROUND: Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPK) transplantation has become an accepted therapy for type 1 diabetic patients with end-stage renal disease. This open-label, multicenter study compared the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus with the microemulsion (ME) formulation of cyclosporine in a clinical setting. The 1-year results are reported here. METHODS: The study was conducted in 10 European centers and one center in Israel. One hundred three patients were randomly assigned to tacrolimus and 102 to cyclosporine-ME. All patients received concomitant rabbit anti-T-cell globulin induction therapy, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and short-term cortico-steroids. The initial daily oral doses were 0.2 mg/kg for tacrolimus, 7 mg/kg for cyclosporine-ME, and 2 to 3 g for MMF. RESULTS: The 1-year incidence of biopsy-proven kidney or pancreas acute rejection was lower with tacrolimus (27.2%) than with cyclosporine-ME (38.2%; P = 0.09). Pancreas graft survival at 1 year was 91.3% with tacrolimus and 74.5% with cyclosporine-ME (P <0.0005). Renal graft survival was similar in the two study groups. There were no significant treatment-related differences in pancreatic or renal graft function. In total, 34 patients switched treatment from cyclosporine-ME to tacrolimus, but only 6 patients receiving tacrolimus required alternative therapy. Mean doses of MMF at 1 year were also lower in the tacrolimus group (1.36 vs. 1.67 g/day; P = 0.007). CONCLUSION: These findings support the use of tacrolimus therapy for uremic patients with type 1 diabetes who are undergoing SPK transplantation.     

Hepatitis C virus recurrence after liver transplantation: influence of immunosuppressive regimens on viral load and liver histology

Cyclosporine has recently been reported to produce in vitro suppression of hepatitis C virus replication driven by blockade of cyclophilins, an effect not shown for tacrolimus. However, the clinical consequence of this in vitro finding have not been well studied in vivo. We compared viral load and fibrosis in transplanted patients receiving monotherapy with tacrolimus or cyclosporine. Patients with recurrent hepatitis C after transplantation were selected from two tertiary centers with the following inclusion criteria: monotherapy with tacrolimus or cyclosporine for more than 12 months before viral load measurement, no antiviral treatment, corticosteroids stopped within 12 months after transplantation. HIV, hepatitis B, and active infection by cytomegalovirus were excluded. Patient characteristics, viral load, and fibrosis were compared by univariate analysis between the cyclosporine and tacrolimus groups. Significant variables, viral load, and fibrosis were included in a multivariate model. Sixty-six patients were included, 46 on tacrolimus and 20 on cyclosporine. Fifty-six were male, and the mean age was 55.3 +/- 10.1 years. Fibrosis (Ishak score) was 3.9 +/- 1.9 in the cyclosporine group and 2.7 +/- 1.9 in the tacrolimus group (P = .019). Viral load (log(10)IU/mL) was 5.8 +/- 0.5 and 5.9 +/- 0.5, respectively (P = .7) and time since liver transplantation was 95.3 +/- 47.7 and 41.1 +/- 16.8 months (P = .0001). In the multivariate model, viral load (P = .65) and fibrosis (P = .24) were not significantly different and only time since transplantation remained significant (P = .0001). In conclusion, viral load was not different in patients with tacrolimus as compared with cyclosporine, and the lower fibrosis observed in the cyclosporine group lacked significance when considered together with time since liver transplantation.     

Cyclosporine and tacrolimus: influence on cardiovascular risk factors

After allogenic transplantations, a dramatic increase in the development of arteriosclerotic plaques can be observed, which might be due to metabolic alterations, changes in the transplant organ, or the immunosuppression regimen. Many studies have demonstrated beneficial effects of tacrolimus compared with cyclosporine with regard to these conditions. These results have suggested that conversion to tacrolimus from cyclosporine is advantageous. Our study investigated whether patients with deteriorating renal function profit from this conversion. Thirty renal transplant patients were studied retrospectively, using data recorded from 3 years before to 3 years after conversion from cyclosporine to tacrolimus. While renal function (GFR) deteriorated progressively under cyclosporine, it stabilized and even improved under tacrolimus (creatinine: DeltaCyc = +1.4 mg/d; DeltaTac = -0.7 mg/dL; GFR: DeltaCyc = -35 mL/min; DeltaTac = 14 mL/min). In addition, uric acid levels (7.0 mg/dL vs 6.4 mg/dL, P < .05) and cholesterol levels (258 mg/dL vs 225 mg/dL, P < .05) were both significantly lower under tacrolimus. Conversion from cyclosporine to tacrolimus is recommended for kidney transplant patients in whom there has been a progressive fall in renal function. It leads to stabilization or even improvement of transplant function and a reduction in cardiovascular risk factors.     

Incidence and Cost of New Onset Diabetes Mellitus Among U.S. Wait-Listed and Transplanted Renal Allograft Recipients

This study sought to determine 1) the incidence and costs of new onset diabetes mellitus (NODM) associated with maintenance immunosuppression regimens following renal transplantation and 2) whether the mode of dialysis pretransplant or the type of calcineurin inhibition used for maintenance immunosuppression affected either the incidence or cost of NODM. The study examined the United States Renal Data System's clinical and financial records from 1994 to 1998 of all adult, first, single-organ, renal transplantations in either 1996 or 1997 with adequate financial records. It used the second diagnosis of diabetes in previously nondiabetic patients to identify NODM. While NODM had an incidence of approximately 6% per year among wait-listed dialysis patients, NODM over the first 2 years post-transplant had an incidence of almost 18% and 30% among patients receiving cyclosporine and tacrolimus, respectively. By 2 years post-transplant, Medicare paid an extra $21 500 per newly diabetic patient. We estimated the cost of diabetes attributable to maintenance immunosuppression regimens to be $2025 and $3308 for each tacrolimus patient and $1137 and $1611 for each cyclosporine patient at 1 and 2 years post-transplant, respectively.     

Is acute rejection the key predictor for long-term outcomes after renal transplantation when comparing calcineurin inhibitors?

In the context of modern immunosuppressive regimens, the overall incidence of acute rejection may no longer be the most accurate surrogate marker for long-term kidney graft survival. The type, severity, timing, and clinical course of acute rejection each influence the impact of a rejection episode, and if renal function recovers fully, there appears to be no survival disadvantage. Randomized clinical trials in renal transplant patients have generally shown that there are fewer acute rejection episodes with tacrolimus compared with cyclosporine, although with contemporary regimens, including mycophenolate acid, this difference is less marked than previously. In randomized trials, kidney graft survival rates with cyclosporine and tacrolimus have proven similar. Large-scale registry analyses have consistently shown no graft survival benefit with tacrolimus vs cyclosporine, and indeed, 2 such analyses have reported significantly higher graft survival with cyclosporine-based immunosuppression compared with tacrolimus in living-donor kidney transplant patients receiving mycophenolate mofetil. There are no reports of improved patient survival with either calcineurin inhibitor after kidney transplantation. In conclusion, the perception of better efficacy with tacrolimus vs cyclosporine based on the incidence of acute rejection is not supported by a difference in graft or patient survival after kidney transplantation.     

Causes of rehospitalization after renal transplantation; does age of recipient matter?

BACKGROUND: This study assessed the causes and related factors of rehospitalization following renal transplantation among elderly compared with younger patients. METHODS: We reviewed the charts of 567 patients rehospitalized after kidney transplantation from 2000 to 2006. According to age at the time of transplantation, hospitalizations were divided into two groups: group 1 (age >or=50 years) and group II (age 20 to 50 years). Demographics, clinical findings, causes for rehospitalization, patient outcomes (recovery, graft loss, death), intensive care unit (ICU) admission, length of hospital stay, time interval from transplantation to rehospitalization, as well as hospital costs were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-five (32.6%) rehospitalizations were charted for group I, who showed a higher proportion of admissions due to infection (42.2% vs 29.8%, P=.004) and macrovascular disease (3.8% vs 1.0%, P=.027) compared with group II. ICU admission (8.8% vs 2.4%, P=.001), mortality (10.2% vs 3.6%, P=.008), and hospital charges (1610 +/- 933 vs 931 +/- 850 purchase power parity dollars, P=.001) were also seen more frequently in group I but displayed a lower frequency of admissions due to graft rejection (20% vs 34.3%, P=.001). CONCLUSION: Recipient age at the time of transplantation was a main factor affecting rehospitalization among our patients.     

Tacrolimus as secondary intervention vs. cyclosporine continuation in patients at risk for chronic renal allograft failure

BACKGROUND: Chronic renal allograft failure (CRAF) is the leading cause of graft loss post-renal transplantation. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus as secondary intervention in cyclosporine-treated kidney transplantation patients with impaired allograft function as indicated by elevated serum creatinine (SCr) levels. METHODS: Patients receiving cyclosporine-based immunosuppression who had an elevated SCr at least 3 months post-renal transplantation were enrolled. Treatment allocation was 2:1 to switch to tacrolimus or continue cyclosporine. This analysis was performed after 2 yr; patients will be followed for an additional 3 yr. RESULTS: There were 186 enrolled and evaluable patients. On baseline biopsy, 90% of patients had chronic allograft nephropathy. Baseline median SCr was 2.5 mg/dL in both treatment groups. For patients with graft function at month 24, SCr had decreased to 2.3 mg/dL in the tacrolimus-treated patients and increased to 2.6 mg/dL in the cyclosporine-treated patients (p = 0.01). Acute rejection occurred in 4.8% of tacrolimus-treated patients and 5.0% of cyclosporine-treated patients during follow-up. Two-year allograft survival was comparable between groups (tacrolimus 69%, cyclosporine 67%; p = 0.70). Tacrolimus-treated patients had significantly lower cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein levels and also had fewer new-onset infections. Cardiac conditions developed in significantly fewer tacrolimus-treated patients (5.6%) than cyclosporine-treated patients (24.3%; p = 0.004). Glucose levels and the incidences of new-onset diabetes and new-onset hyperglycemia did not differ between treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Conversion from cyclosporine to tacrolimus results in improved renal function and lipid profiles, and significantly fewer cardiovascular events with no differences in the incidence of acute rejection or new-onset hyperglycemia.     

Results and Complications after Living Related Kidney Transplantation in Hungary: 30 Years' Experience

The number of patients suffering from kidney disorders is increasing the need for kidney transplantation. Kidneys originating from living donors (LD) show substantially better results than those originating from cadaveric donors (CD). We performed 3000 kidney transplantations between November 1973 and December 2007, including 154 from LD (5.13%). The early kidney function as measured by the delta creatinine clearance was significantly better among the LD group (P < .001). There was no significant difference in the immunologic data between the LD and the CD groups (P = .047). Four years after transplantation the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and the serum creatinine level treated to be better among the LD group with tacrolimus versus cyclosporine immunosuppression (P = .089). In the LD group, the acute rejection rate was lower with tacrolimus- versus cyclosporine based immunosuppression (P = .014).     

Daclizumab induction therapy associated with tacrolimus-MMF has better outcome compared with tacrolimus-MMF alone in pediatric living donor liver transplantation

AIMS: Immunosuppression therapy for the control of immunologic rejection is a key aspect in liver transplantation. The objective of this study was to evaluate induction therapy with daclizumab (DAC) in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in children. METHODS: We compared 2 different immunosuppression protocols in 30 children undergoing LDLT. The patients were divided into 2 groups: 12 patients received tacrolimus with mycophenolate mofetil (TAC-MMF), and 18 patients received tacrolimus with MMF and DAC induction therapy at days 0 and 14 after LDLT (DAC-TAC-MMF). Both groups were similar with regard to age, sex, weight, and indication for liver transplantation. The incidence of biopsy-proved rejection episodes, posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD), and renal dysfunction were evaluated. Tacrolimus levels at posttransplantation day 14 and at 2 months after transplantation were compared in the 2 groups. RESULTS: Acute rejection episodes were observed in 8 patients in the TAC-MMF group (66%), and none in the DAC-TAC-MMF group (0%; P < .05). Neither PTLD nor renal dysfunction was seen in any patient. Mean Tacrolimus level on posttransplantation day 14 was 10.67 +/- 5.4 ng/mL in the TAC-MMF group and 5.65 +/- 3.6 ng/mL in the DAC-TAC-MMF group (P < .05). After the second month the mean tacrolimus levels were 7.2 +/- 2.9 ng/mL and 6.8 +/- 3.5 ng/mL in the TAC-MMF and DAC-TAC-MMF groups, respectively. (P = NS). CONCLUSION: Induction therapy with DAC is safe and associated with a lower incidence of rejection episodes among children undergoing LDLT.