Suture of new and old peripheral meniscus tears

A prospective study of repaired vertical peripheral tears of the meniscus in fifty patients (nine women and forty-one men) was carried out from January 1977 to June 1980. All tears were confirmed preoperatively by arthroscopy. Forty-three medial and seven lateral menisci were repaired. Fifteen tears were treated within two weeks and thirty-five were operated on as long as seven years after injury. Only eight patients had a meniscal tear that was not accompanied by injuries of either the anterior cruciate ligament or the collateral ligaments, or both. At a mean follow-up of eighteen months (range, six to thirty-nine months), forty-two patients (84 per cent) had clinically apparent healing of the sutured meniscal tear. Repeat arthroscopy was done in twenty-seven (64 per cent) of these patients, four to twenty-nine months (mean, twelve months) after the operation. The arthroscopy proved that all of these repaired tears had healed. Eight patients had a second tear after the initial repair: four were reruptures at the sutured area and four were new ruptures in another area of the meniscus and were associated with fresh trauma. All of these patients subsequently had an arthroscopic meniscectomy.     

Second look arthroscopic evaluation of repaired radial/oblique tears of the midbody of the lateral meniscus in stable knees

Background

Radial/oblique tears of the midbody of the lateral meniscus significantly impair the ability of the meniscus to withstand the tibiofemoral load, requiring meniscal repair. However, healing status after meniscal repair has not been fully elucidated. This study aimed to evaluate arthroscopic findings after inside-out suture repair for isolated radial/oblique tears of the midbody of the lateral meniscus.

Posterior root tear of the medial and lateral meniscus

An avulsion of the tibial insertion of the meniscus or a radial tear close to the meniscal insertion is defined as a root tear. In clinical practice, the incidence of these lesions is often underestimated. However, several biomechanical studies have shown that the effect of a root tear is comparable to a total meniscectomy. Clinical studies documented progredient arthritic changes following root tears, thereby supporting basic science studies. The clinical diagnosis is limited by unspecific symptoms. In addition to the diagnostic arthroscopy, MRI is considered to be the gold standard of diagnosis of a meniscal root tear. Three different direct MRI signs for the diagnosis of a meniscus root tear have been described: Radial linear defect in the axial plane, vertical linear defect (truncation sign) in the coronal plane, and the so-called ghost meniscus sign in the sagittal plane. Meniscal extrusion is also considered to be an indirect sign of a root tear, but is less common in lateral root tears. During arthroscopy, the function of the meniscus root must be assessed by probing. However, visualization of the meniscal insertions is challenging. Refixation of the meniscal root can be performed using a transtibial pull-out suture, suture anchors, or side-to-side repair. Several short-term studies reported good clinical results after medial or lateral root repair. Nevertheless, MRI and second-look arthroscopy revealed high rates of incomplete or absent healing, especially for medial root tears. To date, most studies are case series with short-term follow-up and level IV evidence. Outerbridge grade 3 or 4 chondral lesions and varus malalignment of >5° were found to predict an inferior clinical outcome after medial meniscus root repair. Further research is needed to evaluate long-term results and to define evident criteria for meniscal root repair.     

Effects of abrasion therapy on tears in the avascular region of sheep menisci

This study was designed to test the hypothesis that abrasion of the parameniscal synovium aids healing of a stable tear in the avascular region of the meniscus in a sheep model. In six sheep, a 5-7-mm longitudinal full-thickness tear was made in the avascular inner half of the anterior part of the lateral meniscus. The parameniscal synovium was abraded superiorly and inferiorly from the meniscus periphery to the lesion. Three animals in a control group received identical meniscal tears but no abrasion treatment. A harness prevented weight bearing and maintained the knee fully flexed after surgery. Twelve weeks after the operation, no healing was seen in any tears. Histologic examination revealed in both groups increased numbers of dividing chondrocytes on either side of the tear. In the test group, several layers of fibroblasts, which appeared in two menisci to derive from the upper meniscal surface, were seen covering both cut surfaces of the tear. It is concluded that the distance from the periphery to the defect is too far for abrasion therapy to stimulate sufficient cellular ingrowth to facilitate repair of tears in the avascular region of the meniscus.     

膝关节半月板撕裂的磁共振表现

目的进一步认识膝关节半月板撕裂的磁共振成像(MRI)表现。方法回顾分析50例膝关节半月板撕裂的MRI资料,所有病例均经关节镜手术证实。采用永磁型MRI机,场强0.2T。结果50例半月板撕裂中,按照部位分类,半月板撕裂位于内侧半月板前角2例,内侧后角37例,外侧半月板前角5例,外侧后角3例,同时累及半月板前角、体部和后角者内侧2例,外侧1例。按照半月板撕裂的形式分为:水平撕裂8例;垂直撕裂4例;斜形撕裂26例;纵形撕裂3例;放射状撕裂4例;桶柄状撕裂2例;复杂撕裂3例。结论MRI能够清楚显示膝关节半月板撕裂的部位和形式,为临床治疗提供可靠的依据,是目前诊断半月板撕裂的最好的影像学检查方法。     

Arthroscopic Meniscal Repair Using Biodegradable Screws

Objective Repair of meniscal tears to restore meniscal shape and function as well as to preserve meniscal chondroprotective and knee-stabilizing properties. Indications Peripheral incomplete or complete longitudinal tears of the medial or lateral meniscus. “Bucket-handle tears”. Contraindications Unstable joint not treated successfully. Complex meniscal tears or radial tears. Degenerative meniscal tissue. Meniscal lesions in the avascular central zone. Osteoarthritis. Infections. Local cutaneous affections. Surgical Technique Knee arthroscopy and inspection of the meniscal lesion. Freshening of the meniscal edges using a rasp or shaver. Intraarticular placement of the meniscal screws using a cannulated device. Perforation of the meniscus and refixation of the tear. Results 60 patients of a total of 65 were followed up by clinical examination after an average of 18 (8–34) months. Two patients had already undergone a partial meniscectomy at the time of follow-up, three had a recurrence of typical clinical signs of a meniscal tear. The other 55 patients rated the overall clinical results as “excellent” (n = 21), “good” (n = 31), or “satisfactory” (n = 3). The average Lysholm score at the time of examination was 93 (49–100) points.     

Die arthroskopische Meniskusrefixierung mit bioresorbierbaren Schrauben

Objective Repair of meniscal tears to restore meniscal shape and function as well as to preserve meniscal chondroprotective and knee-stabilizing properties. Indications Peripheral incomplete or complete longitudinal tears of the medial or lateral meniscus.“Bucket-handle tears”. Contraindications Unstable joint not treated successfully.Complex meniscal tears or radial tears.Degenerative meniscal tissue.Meniscal lesions in the avascular central zone.Osteoarthritis.Infections.Local cutaneous affections. Surgical Technique Knee arthroscopy and inspection of the meniscal lesion. Freshening of the meniscal edges using a rasp or shaver. Intraarticular placement of the meniscal screws using a cannulated device. Perforation of the meniscus and refixation of the tear. Results 60 patients of a toal of 65 were followed up by clinical examination after an average of 18 (8–34) months. Two patients had already undergone a partial meniscectomy at the time of follow-up, three had a recurrence of typical clinical signs of a meniscal tear. The other 55 patients rated the overall clinical results as “excellent” (n = 21), “good” (n = 31), or “satisfactory” (n = 3). The average Lysholm score at the time of examination was 93 (49–100) points.     

Meniscus Tears: Treatment in the Stable and Unstable Knee

Basic science research and follow-up studies after meniscectomy have provided convincing evidence of the importance of preservation of the meniscus in decreasing the risk of late degenerative changes. Whether in a stable or an unstable knee, if a meniscus tear cannot be repaired, a conservative partial meniscectomy should be undertaken to preserve as much meniscal tissue as possible. When feasible, repair should be carried out in young patients with an isolated meniscus tear, despite healing rates that are significantly lower than those obtained when meniscus repair is done with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The incidence of successful healing is inversely related to the rim width and tear length. In general, meniscus repair should be limited to patients under 50 years of age. Vertical longitudinal tears, including bucket-handle tears, are most amenable to repair. Some radial split tears can be repaired. In an ACL-deficient knee, meniscus repair is more prone to failure if not performed in conjunction with an ACL reconstruction, and is not recommended. Meniscal allograft surgery is investigational but may hold promise for selected patients.     

Die arthroskopische Meniskusnaht

OBJECTIVE: Restoration of the function of the meniscus by suturing a tear to prevent long-term degeneration. INDICATIONS: Unstable longitudinal meniscal tear in the red and red-white zones with an intact central fragment. Dislocated bucket-handle tear near the base in the presence of good-quality tissue. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Lesion of the central meniscal fragment. Meniscal tears in the white, avascular zone. Degenerative meniscal lesions. Complex meniscal lesions. Untreated knee ligament instability. Uncooperative patient. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Standard anterior arthroscopy approach. Revitalization of the tear margins and the perimeniscal synovial membrane, trephination of the base of the meniscus to promote healing. Fixation of the tear with a resorbable or nonresorbable suture size 2-0 to 0 USP by means of different suture techniques. "Outside-in technique": the suture is introduced from outside the joint through the base of the meniscus using a cannulated needle and is then pulled back out using a suture loop inserted with another cannulated needle. The U-suture is knotted over the joint capsule through a stab incision. "Inside-out technique": the suture is introduced using a needle through a guide cannula from outside the joint through the meniscus and joint capsule and then brought out of the joint. The U-suture is knotted over the capsule through a short skin incision. "All-inside technique": the suture loop is passed through the meniscal tear and knotted within the joint using a posterior arthroscopy approach. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Full weight bearing without a brace for short tears with one suture. For tears with two sutures, partial weight bearing for 4 weeks without a brace. For large tears with three to four sutures, partial weight bearing up to 20 kp for 6 weeks and restricted knee motion in a brace up to 0/0/60 degrees . RESULTS: The healing rate for knee joints with stable ligaments and an isolated meniscal tear is between 50% and 75%. In cases with simultaneous ACL (anterior cruciate ligament) plasty, the healing rate is > 75%; for unstable knee joints it is < 50%.     

Diagnostics of degenerative meniscal tears at 3-Tesla MRI compared to arthroscopy as reference standard

Introduction The goal of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of 3-Tesla MRI for the assessment of degenerative meniscal tears in clinical practice. Materials and methods In patients with chronic knee pain, a negative history of acute trauma and a mean age of 52 years, 3-Tesla MRI were performed a few days prior to arthroscopy. In 86 menisci, diagnostic values of 3-Tesla MRI for the detection of degenerative tears were evaluated using arthroscopy as reference standard. The MRI classification, for meniscus diagnostics, described by Crues was used. Results At arthroscopy, all tears identified (19 horizontal, 7 complex, 3 radial) were degenerative as confirmed by histological examination. MRI grade II lesions had a prevalence of 24% and a rate of 24% of missed tears, whereas grade I lesions were not associated with a torn meniscus at arthroscopy. For meniscal tears, (grade III) sensitivity and specificity of 3-Telsa MRI was 79 and 95% for both menisci, 86 and 100% for the medial meniscus, and 57 and 92% for the lateral meniscus. The best diagnostic performance was found for complex tears, horizontal tears showed relatively good results, poor results were documented for radial tears. Conclusion For the medial meniscus, where horizontal and complex tears were more prevalent, 3-Tesla MRI shows a higher accuracy than for the lateral meniscus. Particularly with regard to the medial meniscus, 3-Tesla MRI could be effectively used when a degenerative tear is suspected. Nevertheless, in regard to a remarkable number of false positive and false negative findings the diagnostic value of a 3-Tesla MRI investigation should not be overestimated.     

Biodegradable arrows for arthroscopic repair of meniscal tears

Thirty-two meniscal tears in 32 patients were repaired using biodegradable meniscus arrows. The tears were fixed arthroscopically using an all-inside technique. Ten patients had a simultaneous anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The period of follow-up was an average of 25 (10-40) months. Twenty-six patients were clinically stable and asymptomatic at follow-up. Six patients were considered clinically unstable and all had associated ACL reconstruction and required a repeat arthroscopy. Two meniscal repairs failed to heal, and the broken meniscus arrow was retrieved arthroscopically 6 months after the primary operation. In four cases the meniscal tear healed completely (two cases) or partially. Otherwise, there were no objective signs of complications. The use of meniscus arrows is a simple, safe, and reliable method for repair of properly selected meniscal tears.     

Results of rasping of meniscal tears with and without anterior cruciate ligament injury as evaluated by second-look arthroscopy

Purpose: Meniscal rasping without suturing has been experimentally shown to stimulate vascular induction in tears in the avascular zone of menisci, resulting in meniscal healing. The goals of this study were to arthroscopically assess the results of meniscal rasping and analyze the factors affecting meniscal healing. Type of Study: Retrospective cohort study. Methods: Forty-eight torn menisci in 47 patients (age range, 14-47 years; average, 24 years) treated arthroscopically with the meniscal rasping technique were evaluated by second-look arthroscopy. The interval between the injury and the time of surgery ranged from 3 weeks to 13 years. There were 35 lateral and 13 medial meniscal tears associated with 44 anterior cruciate ligament injuries; 28 of the menisci had a full-thickness longitudinal tear and the other 20 had a partial-thickness tear. The length of the tears ranged from 10 to 33 mm (mean, 14.4 mm). The distance from the capsule to the tear ranged from 1 to 9 mm (mean, 5.0 mm). Results: Thirty-four menisci (71%) healed completely (without a marked visible unhealed area), 10 (21%) healed incompletely, and 4 (8%) showed no evidence of healing. There were no relationships between outcome and age, gender, injured side, or time from injury and rasping. Both the distance from the capsule to the tear and the length of the tear were longer in the unhealed menisci. Stable tears had a high healing rate after meniscal rasping. Conclusions: Meniscal rasping without suturing is an easy procedure to perform and seems to be a reliable way to repair longitudinal tears in the avascular region of the meniscus, although the healing potential of the procedure is affected by the distance from the capsule to the tear site and the length and the stability of the tear.Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, Vol 19, No 5 (May-June), 2003: pp 463–469     

Repeat tears of repaired menisci after arthroscopic confirmation of healing

We undertook 114 arthroscopic meniscal repairs in 111 patients and subsequently carried out second-look arthroscopy to confirm meniscal healing at a mean of 13 months after repair. Stable healing at the repaired site was seen in 90. Of these, however, 13 had another arthroscopy later for a further tear. The mean period between the repair and the observation of a repeat tear was 48 months. Of the 13 patients, 11 had returned to high activity levels (International Knee Documentation Committee level I or II) after the repair. An attempt should be made to preserve meniscal function by repairing tears, but even after arthroscopic confirmation of stable healing repaired menisci may tear again. The long-term rate of healing may not be as high as is currently reported. Second-look arthroscopy cannot predict late meniscal failure and may not be justified as a method of assessment for meniscal healing. Young patients engaged in arduous sporting activities should be reviewed regularly even after arthroscopic confirmation of healing.     

Hi-frequency electrical cautery stimulation in the treatment of displaced meniscal tears

This is a preliminary report of four cases of meniscal displaced tears: two bucket handle medial meniscus tears, one complex tear in the avascular zone or lateral meniscus, and one longitudinal full-thickness tear on the lateral meniscus. These tears were treated by applying hi- frequency current stimulation to the tissues and obtaining total meniscal visual healing on a second arthroscopic view after 6 weeks.Arthroscopy 1998 Sep;14(6):566-71     

Cysts of the lateral meniscus: arthroscopy versus arthroscopy plus open cystectomy

A retrospective analysis was performed on 32 knees in 31 patients with the diagnosis of cyst of the lateral meniscus. Average follow-up was 41 months, with a range of 16-72 months. Surgical and histological examination demonstrated pathology varying from large meniscal tears with minimal cyst formation to large cysts with no demonstrable meniscal tear. Two theories of etiology emerged: (a) The tear begins in the meniscus and spreads through the periphery. (b) The lesion begins as a compression injury to the vascular periphery and spreads centrally, producing a meniscus tear, or peripherally, producing a cyst, or both. In our series, 20 patients managed by arthroscopic partial meniscectomy and open cystectomy had 80% excellent-good results versus 50% excellent-good results in 12 patients treated with arthroscopy and partial meniscectomy without extraarticular cystectomy. We recommend the following treatment: arthroscopy with a diligent search for a lateral meniscal tear, especially peripherally. If none is found, proceed to extraarticular cystectomy. If a tear is found, remove all unstable meniscal fragments, leaving a rim, if possible, especially adjacent to the popliteus recess, and then proceed to open cystectomy.     

Clinical and MRI evaluation of meniscal tears repaired with bioabsorbable arrows.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Excision of meniscal tissue has been shown to increase the risk of degenerative changes of the knee joint. Whenever possible, meniscus repair has become the procedure of choice for treatment of meniscal tears. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present retrospective study evaluated the healing results of 77 meniscal ruptures treated with the an all-inside technique (Biofix meniscus arrow). The study group consisted of 73 patients with 77 longitudinal, vertical meniscal ruptures treated at Helsinki University Hospital between the beginning of January 1997 and the end of March 2001. The patients who had not received secondary surgery for failed repair during the follow-up period were examined clinically and with MRI. RESULTS: Fifty-one out of 77 meniscal ruptures (66%) healed clinically. In repairs performed in conjunction with ligament reconstruction the healing rate was higher (79%) than in the isolated tears (56%). The poorest results were seen in the very long vertical tears with luxation of the meniscus (38% healing rate). CONCLUSIONS: Bioabsorbable arrows offer a good alternative for treatment of meniscal ruptures, but the arrows alone do not seem to be sufficient to provide a reliable long-lasting result in the repair of very unstable meniscal ruptures.     

Editorial Commentary: Efforts to Heal Meniscal Radial Tears Are Ongoing

Meniscal radial tears are equivalent to the meniscectomized state. However, successful healing rates by current repair methods for meniscal radial tears are still not satisfactory. Several suture configurations that could approximate the tear gap and stabilize meniscal tissue have been developed to overcome the shortcomings of simple horizontal stitches and cross stitches. The hybrid stitch method, composed of horizontal stitches and vertical stitches, has been introduced. This method can provide stable fixation because the vertical stitches suture the bundle of circumferential fibers, and the vertical stitches act as rip stops for the horizontal stitches. However, it is still challenging to heal meniscal radial tears in avascular areas or complex tears. In treating radial tears, it is important not only to improve suture mechanics but also to promote biologic healing potential.     

The use of axial reconstructed images from three-dimensional MRI datasets for morphological diagnosis of meniscal tears of the knee

Introduction In recent years, three-dimensional (3D) MRI has been utilized to detect meniscal tears and has displayed several advantages over 2D MRI. The diagnostic performance to discriminate the type of meniscal tears by 2D MRI (sagittal and coronal images) and axial images from 3D MRI datasets has not been reported yet. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the efficacy of the axial reconstructed images from 3D MRI datasets for the morphological diagnosis of meniscal tears of the knee.Materials and methods Seventy-four menisci in 37 patients who underwent arthroscopic surgery of the knee were studied. All patients were examined by 2D sagittal and coronal MRI and by axial images from 3D MRI datasets prior to surgery. First, we compared the diagnostic performance for meniscal tears by 2D sagittal and coronal MRI to that by axial images from 3D MRI datasets as judged by arthroscopic findings. Second, we compared the correlation of tear types presumed from 2D sagittal and coronal MRI to arthroscopy with those presumed from axial images from 3D MRI datasets to arthroscopy.Results For the diagnostic performance of meniscal tears on 2D MRI, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were 93.5%, 88.4% and 90.5%, respectively. On axial images from 3D MRI, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were 96.8%, 79.1% and 86.5%, respectively. Nine cases were false-positive on axial images, while 5 cases were false-positive on 2D images. Correlations to arthroscopy were 100% by both scans for longitudinal tears and discoid meniscus tears. Only 29% were correctly diagnosed by 2D sagittal and coronal images for radial tears, however, all radial tears could be correctly diagnosed by axial images. All horizontal tears were correctly diagnosed on 2D sagittal and coronal images, while none of the horizontal tears could be correctly diagnosed from axial images.Conclusion Axial images from 3D MRI datasets were useful in the diagnosis of radial tears, but two limitations are noted concerning the use of axial images. First, medial menisci should be carefully read on axial slices because of the relatively high rate of false-positives on medial menisci. Second, axial images cannot discriminate horizontal tears from other types of meniscus tears.     

Arthroscopic repair of the bucket-handle meniscus: 10 failures in 27 stable knees followed for 3 years

In a total of 535 meniscal lesions diagnosed by arthroscopy, 54 patients had their meniscus sutured arthroscopically. 25 cases were excluded from the study due to concomitant ligamentous injury, while 2 were lost to follow-up, leaving 27 cases of arthroscopic repair of isolated bucket-handle meniscal tears for review. 8 cases had the repaired meniscus partially resected later due to recurring symptoms. The remaining 19 cases were scored for knee function and activity after a median observation time of 36 (18-52) months. 15 of 19 patients with a supposedly healed meniscus had normal knee function, i.e., unchanged compared to preinjury levels, but a slight drop in median activity score. With 8 re-ruptures and 2 patients who stated result as poor, the 10/27 failure rate was rather high. Our results are not as good as most reported previously.     

膝关节内外侧半月板后根部撕裂的MRI诊断价值

目的:探讨MRI对膝关节内外侧半月板后根部撕裂的诊断价值。方法:回顾性分析2012年1月至2016年1月,关节镜下证实为半月板后根部撕裂的患者43例。其中男25例,女18例;年龄27~69(42.5±8.3)岁;右侧27例,左侧16例。由2名医师采用双盲法独立回顾性分析经关节镜证实的43例半月板后根部撕裂患者的MRI表现,计算MRI对半月板后根部撕裂的诊断敏感性、特异性和准确性,并计算膝关节韧带损伤及半月板脱位等伴随情况。结果:143例中,关节镜手术证实43例半月板后根部撕裂,包括内侧撕裂24例,外侧撕裂19例。医师A诊断内侧半月板后根部撕裂的敏感性、特异性、准确性分别为91.67%、86.6%、83.9%,伴内侧半月板突出19例,伴前交叉韧带撕裂2例;外侧半月板后跟部撕裂的敏感性、特异性、准确性分别为73.7%、79.9%、79%,伴外侧半月板突出4例,伴前交叉韧带撕裂16例。医师B诊断内侧半月板后根部撕裂的敏感性、特异性、准确性分别为87.5%、87.4%、87.4%,伴内侧半月板突出19例,伴前交叉韧带撕裂2例;外侧半月板后跟部撕裂的敏感性、特异性、准确性分别为78.9%、82.3%、82.5%,伴外侧半月板突出4例,伴前交叉韧带撕裂16例。2名医师采用MRI诊断内、外侧半月板后根部撕裂的一致性均好,Kappa值分别为0.81和0.67。结论 :膝关节MRI诊断内外侧半月板后跟部撕裂及其伴随征象具有较大价值,为临床医生术前诊断提供依据,值得临床推广应用。