树脂加强型玻璃离子黏结剂黏结力的实验研究

目的 了解光固化树脂加强型玻璃离子水门汀的剪切强度能否满足临床需要;并比较不同条件下其剪切强度的变化.方法 收集离体前磨牙50颗,随机均分为5组.第1组(对照组):35%磷酸酸蚀30s,冲洗、干燥,涂黏结剂,采用京津釉质黏结剂黏结托槽.第2、4组:35%磷酸酸蚀30s,冲洗,湿润,采用光固化型的Fuji Ortho Lc树脂加强型玻璃离子黏结托槽.第3、5组:不酸蚀,采用光固化型的Fuji Ortho Lc树脂加强型玻璃离子黏结托槽.1、2、3组用电子万能实验机测24h的抗剪切强度,4、5组测30 min的抗剪切强度.并统计牙面上的黏结剂残留量.结果 第2、3、4组的抗剪切强度均能满足临床需要,第5组的抗剪切强度不能满足临床需要,第2组的抗剪切强度与其它各组相比差别有显著性.结论 光固化树脂加强型玻璃离子在酸蚀和免酸蚀后24h,以及酸蚀黏结30min后的剪切强度均能满足临床需要;而免酸蚀黏结30min的抗剪切强度不能满足临床需要;酸蚀后光固化树脂加强型玻璃离子的剪切强度明显增强.     

光固化树脂加强型玻璃离子水门汀即刻剪切强度的测定

目的研究光固化树脂加强型玻璃离子水门汀黏结正畸托槽的即刻剪切强度。方法收集离体前磨牙30颗,随机均分为3组。第1组(对照组):35%磷酸酸蚀30 s,冲洗、干燥,涂黏结剂,京津釉质黏结剂黏结托槽。第2、3组:35%磷酸酸蚀30 s,冲洗,湿润,光固化型的Fuji Ortho Lc树脂加强型玻璃离子黏结托槽。第1、2组24 h后测剪切强度,第3组30 min内测剪切强度。托槽去除后统计牙面上的黏结剂残留量。结果第2组的剪切强度高于第3组,差异有显著性;第1、3组间剪切强度差异无显著性。结论光固化树脂加强型玻璃离子水门汀的即刻黏结强度能够满足临床要求,但24 h后的黏结强度显著增强。     

树脂加强型玻璃离子水门汀粘结性能和防龋性能的研究

目的对比树脂加强型玻璃离子水门汀与临床普遍使用的复合树脂型正畸釉质粘结剂的抗剪切力,探讨树脂加强型玻璃离子水门汀对牙釉质面脱矿的影响.方法本研究实验一把45颗离体牙随机分成3组,分别使用复合树脂型正畸釉质粘结剂,树脂加强型玻璃离子水门汀及在牙面用厂家提供的处理液进行表面处理后使用树脂加强型玻璃离子门汀粘结正畸托槽.使用材料万能试验机测量各样本的抗剪切力.实验二在离体条件下,对分别使用树脂加强型玻璃离子水门汀,复合树脂型正畸釉质粘结剂粘托槽的釉质面进行人工脱矿,用偏振光显微镜观察釉质面的脱钙程度.结果使用树脂加强型玻璃离子水门汀粘结托槽时,其抗剪切力与临床普遍使用的复合树脂型正畸釉质粘结剂接近,使用树脂加强型玻璃离子水门汀粘结托槽,釉质面未见明显脱矿区.结论树脂加强型玻璃离子水门汀可能是一种适合临床使用的理想托槽粘结剂.     

两种光固化正畸黏结剂的黏结性能评价

目的:研究光固化树脂加强型玻璃离子黏结剂与自酸蚀光固化正畸黏结剂对金属托槽-牙面黏结的特点。方法:60颗离体前磨牙随机分成6组,每组10颗牙,3组用光固化树脂加强型玻璃离子黏结剂,另3组用自酸蚀光固化复合树脂黏结剂黏结正畸托槽,分别于0.5、24h及冷热循环实验后测试其抗剪强度及黏结剂残留指数,并通过扫描电镜观察树脂—牙釉质面形态。结果:2种材料黏结强度均能超过5MPa。但是,24h自酸蚀光固化正畸黏结剂的强度高于光固化树脂加强型玻璃离子黏结剂的强度(P<0.05)。结论:2种光固化正畸黏结剂能提供正畸临床黏结金属托槽足够的黏结力。     

树脂加强型玻璃离子水门汀临床初步应用的研究

目的了解树脂加强型玻璃离子水门汀在临床使用的脱落率,探讨树脂加强型玻璃离子水门汀在临床使用的可行性.方法20名正畸初诊患者的上颌左右侧分别使用正畸用树脂加强型玻璃离子水门汀,复合树脂型正畸釉质粘结剂粘结正畸托槽,观察其临床脱落率.结果树脂加强型玻璃离子水门汀粘结托槽的脱落率与临床普遍使用的复合树脂型正畸釉质粘结剂粘结托槽的脱落率相似.结论树脂加强型玻璃离子水门汀可以满足临床需要.     

树脂加强型玻璃离子水门汀临床初步应用的研究

目的 :临床普遍使用的复合树脂型正畸釉质粘结剂有许多不足之处 ,如在粘结过程和去粘结过程中导致釉质的丧失 ;托槽周围因菌斑积聚和停留导致脱矿等。玻璃离子水门汀因具有能与牙釉质形成化学性粘结 ,能在潮湿环境中使用 ,具有抗龋性等特性而成为替代传统正畸粘结剂的理想选择。但传统型玻璃离子水门汀的粘结力比复合树脂粘结剂低 ,影响了其在临床的广泛应用。如何提高玻璃离子水门汀的粘结性能 ,使其适合正畸临床粘结的需要一直是研究者们关注的热点。近年来出现的树脂加强型玻璃离子水门汀进行了这方面的尝试。材料和方法 :本研究在 2 0名正畸初诊患者的上颌左右侧分别使用正畸用树脂加强型玻璃离子水门汀 ,复合树脂型正畸釉质粘结剂粘结正畸托槽 ,观察其临床脱落率。其主要目的为了解树脂加强型玻璃离子水门汀在临床使用的脱落率 ,探讨树脂加强型玻璃离子水门汀在临床使用的可行性。结果 :托槽粘结后一个月 ,统计托槽的脱落情况 ,结果如下 :用树脂加强型玻璃离子水门汀粘结的 88个托槽有 5个脱落 (2 .3% ) ;而用复合树脂粘结的 88个托槽有 4个脱落 (3.4 % )。卡方检验结果 (df=1,x2 =0 .117,p >0 .0 5 )显示 ,两种粘结剂的脱落率无显著性差异。结论 :树脂加强型玻璃离子水门汀粘结托槽的脱落率与使用     

光固化树脂加强型玻璃离子水门汀粘结性能的研究

目的　了解光固化树脂加强型玻璃离子水门汀在不同条件下的粘结性能 ,探讨一种更简便 ,不太注意污染的粘结方法。方法　 10 5颗因正畸原因拔除的健康双尖牙分成七组 ,在不同条件下 (酸蚀 /百酸蚀后干燥 /被水或唾液污染 )粘结脱槽 ,做冷热循环实验后 ,测剪切强度及粘结剂残余指数。结果　光固化树脂加强型玻璃离子水门汀可以替代复合树脂粘结剂 ,不要求严格隔湿。     

3种无托槽隐形矫治器附件粘接方法的比较研究

目的 比较全酸蚀粘接剂、自酸蚀粘接剂和树脂加强型玻璃离子水门汀3种材料粘接无托槽隐形矫治器附件的操作时间和临床效果。方法 将采用无托槽隐形矫治器矫治的30例错牙合畸形患者（附件156个）随机分为3组,每组10例。A组采用3M Adper Single Bond 2全酸蚀粘接剂和3M Z350纳米充填树脂粘接附件,B组采用3M Adper Easy One自酸蚀粘接剂和3M Z350纳米充填树脂粘接附件,C组直接采用GC Fuji Ortho LC树脂加强型玻璃离子水门汀粘接附件。记录每个附件的操作时间,评价粘接时、治疗1个月和6个月时3组附件的失败情况。结果 C组附件的操作时间较A、B组短（P<0.01）。3组附件之间的粘接失败率无统计学差异（P>0.05）,同一组内不同时间的粘接失败率也无统计学差异（P>0.05）。结论 3种材料粘接附件的稳定性均能达到满意的效果,但树脂加强型玻璃离子水门汀操作简便,更适宜临床推广。     

酸蚀时间对树脂加强型玻璃离子粘结性能的影响

目的 比较光固化树脂加强型玻璃离子水门汀和复合树脂在几种粘结条件下，不同酸蚀时间后的粘结强度，探求减少釉质脱钙的粘结方法。方法 120颗因正畸拔除的健康双尖牙分成8组，酸蚀30秒或90秒后在几种条件下(干燥／被水或唾液潮湿)粘结脱槽，做冷热循环实验后，测剪切强度。结果 复合树脂酸蚀90秒较酸蚀30秒的粘接强度明显增强；光固化树脂玻璃在几种粘接条件下酸蚀90秒和酸蚀30秒粘接强度无明显区别，水潮湿组粘接强度最高。结论 复合树脂可通过延长酸蚀时间增加粘接强度；光固化树脂玻璃酸蚀30秒足够，延长酸蚀时闻不能增加粘接强度，白白造成釉质丢失。     

玻璃离子体水门汀与光固化复合树脂间的抗剪粘结强度

测定5种玻璃离子体水门汀(GIC)与光固化复合树脂间的抗剪粘结强度,结果显示:酸处理GIC表面,可以显著提高GIC与光固化复合树脂间的粘结强度。酸蚀+粘结剂处理优于单纯粘蛄剂处理,两者粘结强度有非常显著差异(P<0.01)。GIC作为光固化复合树脂基底材料在临床上应用,有指导意义。     

Use of a self-etching primer in combination with a resin-modified glass ionomer: effect of water and saliva contamination on shear bond strength.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of 3 different enamel conditioners (10% polyacrylic acid, 37% phosphoric acid, and self-etching primer) on the shear bond strength and site of bond failure of a resin-modified glass ionomer (Fuji Ortho LC, GC Europe, Leuven, Belgium) bonded onto dry, water-moistened, and saliva-moistened enamel. One hundred eighty bovine permanent mandibular incisors were randomly divided into 12 groups; each group consisted of 15 specimens. Three different enamel surface conditions were studied: dry, soaked with water, soaked with saliva. One hundred eighty stainless steel brackets were bonded with the resin-modified glass ionomer. After bonding, all samples were stored in distilled water for 24 hours and then tested in a shear mode on a testing machine. After self-etching primer application, Fuji Ortho LC produced the highest shear bond strengths under all the different enamel surface conditions; these values were significantly higher than those achieved in the remaining groups, except when Fuji Ortho LC was used in combination with 37% phosphoric acid on dry enamel. Fuji Ortho LC bonded without enamel conditioning produced the lowest shear bond strengths. The bond strength of the groups conditioned with 10% polyacrylic acid was significantly lower than that of the groups etched with 37% phosphoric acid, except when both conditioners were used on enamel soaked with water.     

Metallic brackets bonded with resin-reinforced glass ionomer cements under different enamel conditions

OBJECTIVE: To assess the shear bond strength of metallic orthodontic brackets bonded with either Fuji Ortho or Ortho Glass LC resin-reinforced glass ionomer cements to enamel surfaces under different conditions, namely, enamel without etching, enamel conditioned with 37% phosphoric acid and enamel conditioned with Transbond Plus Self Etching Primer (TPSEP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and five bovine inferior incisors were divided into seven groups (n = 15). In group 1 (control) Transbond XT was used according to the manufacturer's recommendations. In groups 2, 3, and 4 all using Fuji Ortho LC, the brackets were bonded, respectively, to enamel nonetched, enamel etched with 37% phosphoric acid, and enamel etched with TPSEP. In groups 5, 6, and 7, the bonding was performed using Ortho Glass LC under the same enamel conditions observed in the other experimental groups. After 24 hours, shear bond strength tests were performed for all samples at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. RESULTS: The results (MPa) showed no statistically significant difference between groups 1, 3, and 4 (P > .05). However, such groups were statistically superior to the others (P < .05). No statistically significant difference was observed between groups 2, 6, and 7 (P > .05). Group 5 showed the lowest shear strength value, which was also statistically inferior to the other groups (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of the enamel treatment, Fuji Ortho LC yielded shear strength values superior to those from Ortho Glass LC.     

树脂修饰化玻璃离子托槽粘结剂粘结强度的体外研究

目的：评估一种树脂修饰化的玻璃离子托槽粘结剂在牙面不同处理方式和环境下的两次粘结后的剪切强度情况。方法：将新近拔除的105颗上颌第一前磨牙随机均分成7组,按照说明书的要求完成托槽的粘结。对照组牙面用37%的磷酸处理后,用光固化复合树脂粘结剂（3M,Transbond XT）粘结。其它6组牙面分别在37%的磷酸、GC处理剂（GC Self-Conditioner）、和不做任何处理的条件下,分别在干燥和湿润的环境下用树脂修饰化的玻璃离子（RMGIC;Fuji ORTHO LC,GC Corporation,Tokyo,Japan）粘结,所有牙齿均选用同种托槽。托槽粘结24 h后,在万能测力机下以1 mm/min的速度卸载,并记录下数值。除去牙面和托槽底面多余粘结剂后,重复上述过程。每次卸载后检查牙釉质损坏情况。结果：对照组两次剪切强度有较小的差异,其它GC玻璃离子粘结剂组两次剪切强度没有统计学意义。GC粘结剂不做任何处理组在干燥和湿润的环境下其剪切强度存在明显的差异。干燥环境下,37%的磷酸和GC处理剂处理后,GC粘结剂组两次卸载后的牙釉质均出现不同程度的釉裂或釉质脱落。结论：这种树脂修饰化的玻璃离子粘结剂可以在多种条件下用于托槽的粘结。     

Effect of blood contamination on shear bond strength of brackets bonded with a self-etching primer combined with a resin-modified glass ionomer

This study assessed the effect of blood contamination on the shear bond strength and bond failure site of a resin-modified glass ionomer (Fuji Ortho LC, GC Europe, Leuven, Belgium) used with 3 enamel conditioners (10% polyacrylic acid, 37% phosphoric acid, and self-etching primer). One hundred twenty bovine permanent mandibular incisors were randomly divided into 8 groups; each group consisted of 15 specimens. Two enamel surface conditions were studied: dry and contaminated with blood. One hundred twenty stainless steel brackets were bonded with the resin-modified glass ionomer. After bonding, all samples were stored in distilled water for 24 hours and then tested in shear mode on a testing machine. The groups conditioned with self-etching primer and 37% phosphoric acid had the highest bond strengths for both dry and blood-contaminated enamel. The groups conditioned with 10% polyacrylic acid showed significantly lower shear bond strength value, and the unconditioned groups had the lowest bond strengths. For each enamel conditioner, no significant difference was reported between dry and blood-contaminated groups. Significant differences in debond locations were found among the groups bonded with the different conditioners. Blood contamination of enamel during the bonding procedure of Fuji Ortho LC did not affect its bond strength values, no matter which enamel conditioner was used.     

Direct bonding comparing a polyacrylic acid and a phosphoric acid technique

The purpose of this study was to compare in vitro a polyacrylic acid technique (crystal bonding) with a conventional phosphoric acid-etch technique for the preparation of teeth for bonding. The potential value of the polyacrylic acid technique was evaluated for bond strength, enamel loss, cleanup, and fracture location--with and without the use of a sealant. Ninety-six premolars were evenly divided into two groups. Group A was preconditioned with polyacrylic acid and group B with phosphoric acid. Half of each group was treated with a sealant before direct bonding of orthodontic brackets. Sealant was not used on the other half of each group and brackets were bonded directly to the conditioned labial surfaces with a composite cement. Bonding and rebonding shear strength tests were carried out for both groups. Results indicated that shear bond strength values for the polyacrylic acid group were approximately one third those of the phosphoric acid group using a composite cement as the adhesive. Enamel loss was measured on the lingual surfaces of 30 of the 96 premolars. The lingual surfaces were conditioned with polyacrylic acid. Following debonding and cleanup procedures, the polyacrylic acid treated surface was left slightly pitted with no resin tags remaining. Cleanup procedures required only a rubber-cup silicate prophylaxis. The total enamel loss was minimal (4.5 micron), thus preserving most of the outermost fluoride-rich layer of enamel.     

Tensile and shear bond strength of resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement to glazed porcelain

The purpose of this study was to measure the tensile and shear bond strength of resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement (RGIC) to glazed porcelain, to evaluate the durability of RGIC by thermal cycling, and to examine the RGIC remaining on the surface of the porcelain after the bond strength test to evaluate bonding conditions. Three adhesives were used in this study: Concise (CO) as a chemically cured composite resin, Fuji ORTHO (FO) as a chemically cured RGIC, and Fuji ORTHO LC (FOLC) as a light-cured RGIC. Tensile and shear bond strengths were measured 24 hours after bonding orthodontic brackets and also after thermal cycling. Tensile bond strength after 24 hours was 6.6 +/- 3.2 MPa in CO, 7.3 +/- 1.4 MPa in FO, and 8.6 +/- 1.9 MPa in FOLC, and the strength significantly decreased after the thermal cycling test. Shear bond strength after 24 hours was 32.5 +/- 8.9 MPa in CO, 23.3 +/- 6.8 MPa in FO, and 24.7 +/- 6.5 MPa in FOLC, and in contrast to tensile bond strength, no decreases in the strength were detected after the thermal cycling test. CO showed significantly higher shear bond strength than did FO and FOLC. When using the shear bond strength test and CO, destruction of porcelain surfaces frequently occurred after 24 hours and was observed in every specimen after the thermal cycling. RGIC was found to be an advantageous alternative to resin adhesive for bracket bonding to porcelain and to enamel.     

Effect of enamel etching on tensile bond strength of brackets bonded in vivo with a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of enamel etching on tensile bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The sample group consisted of 15 patients who had indications for extraction of four premolars for orthodontic reasons, equally divided into two different groups according to bracket and enamel preparation. Brackets were bonded in vivo, by the same operator, using a split mouth random technique: Group 1 (control), phosphoric acid + Fuji Ortho LC; Group 2, Fuji Ortho LC without acid conditioning. The teeth were extracted after 4 weeks using elevators. An Instron Universal Testing Machine was used to apply a tensile force directly to the enamel-bracket interface at a speed of 0.5 mm/min. The groups were compared using a Mann-Whitney U-test and Weibull analysis. RESULTS: Mean results and standard deviations (in MPa) for the groups were: Group 1, 6.26 (3.21), Group 2, 6.52 (2.73). No significant difference was observed in the bond strengths of the two groups evaluated (P = .599). CONCLUSIONS: Fuji Ortho LC showed adequate shear bond strength and may be suitable for clinical use.     

Glass ionomer cements as luting agents for orthodontic brackets

The objectives of the present study were to (1) assess the shear bond strengths of resin-reinforced glass ionomer Fuji Ortho LC and GC Fuji Ortho cements under differing conditions and (2) compare their bonding performance with that of conventional resin composite bonding systems. A sample of 264 bovine incisors was divided into 22 groups of 12 teeth each and bonded with SPEED central incisor brackets. Enamel surfaces of the teeth in the two experimental groups were conditioned according to the manufacturer's instructions; moreover, groups unconditioned before bonding were also included under both wet and dry conditions. A self-cure composite resin (Phase II) and a light-cure composite resin (Transbond XT) served as controls and were etched with 37% phosphoric acid and bonded in a dry field. After incubation at 37 degrees C for 24 hours and for seven days, the specimens were tested to failure with a shear force in an Instron machine. The Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI) was used to assess the amount of resin left on the enamel surfaces after debonding. Selected specimens were examined using scanning electron microscopy. Statistical analyses included analysis of variance tests, t-tests, and correlation coefficient calculations and showed that no significant difference existed between the glass ionomer cements under wet or dry conditions, provided the enamel was conditioned with 10% polyacrylic acid before bonding. Both glass ionomer cements were thus acceptable for bonding. Transbond XT had the highest mean shear bond strength irrespective of the incubation period. A positive correlation was obtained between the ARI scores and bond strength.     

A self-conditioner for resin-modified glass ionomers in bonding orthodontic brackets

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a new self-etch conditioner used with resin-modified glass ionomers (RMGIs) in bonding orthodontic brackets. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty human molars were cleaned, mounted, and randomly divided into three groups. In group 1 (control), 20 orthodontic brackets were bonded to teeth using Transbond Plus Self-etching Primer; in group 2, 20 brackets were bonded using an RMGI with a 10% polyacrylic acid conditioner. In group 3, 20 brackets were bonded using Fuji Ortho LC with a new no-rinse self-conditioner for RMGIs. The same bracket type was used on all groups. The teeth were debonded in shear mode using a universal testing machine, and the amount of residual adhesive remaining on each tooth was evaluated. Analysis of variance was used to compare the shear bond strength (SBS), and the chi(2) test was used to compare the Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI) scores. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the SBS (P = .556) between the groups. The mean SBS for Transbond Plus was 8.6 +/- 2.6 MPa, for Fuji Ortho LC using 10% polyacrylic acid 9.1 +/- 4.6 MPa, and for Fuji Ortho LC using GC Self-conditioner 9.9 +/- 4.1 MPa. The comparisons of the ARI scores between the three groups (chi(2) = 35.5) indicated that bracket failure mode was significantly different (P < .001), with more adhesive remaining on the teeth bonded using Transbond. Conclusions: The new self-etch conditioner can be used with an RMGI to successfully bond brackets. In addition, brackets bonded with Fuji Ortho LC resulted in less residual adhesive remaining on the teeth.