Medial Rotator Cuff Failure After Arthroscopic Double-Row Rotator Cuff Repair

Persistent tendon defects after rotator cuff repair are not uncommon. Recently, the senior author has identified a subset of 5 patients (mean age, 52 years; range, 42 to 59 years) after arthroscopic double-row rotator cuff repair who showed an unusual mechanism of tendon failure. In these patients the tendon footprint appears well fixed to the greater tuberosity with normal thickness. However, medial to the intact footprint, the tendon is torn with full-thickness defects through the rotator cuff. All patients were involved in Workers' Compensation claims. Magnetic resonance arthrography showed an intact cuff footprint but dye leakage in all patients. Revision surgery was performed at a mean of 8.6 months after the index procedure and showed an intact rotator cuff footprint but cuff failure medial to the footprint. Four patients had repair of the defects by tendon-to-tendon side-to-side sutures, whereas one did not undergo repair. Medial-row failure of the rotator cuff is a previously unreported mechanism of failure after double-row rotator cuff repair. Given the small number of patients in this study, it is unclear whether these defects are symptomatic. However, repair of these defects resulted in improvement in pain in 4 of 5 patients.     

A Novel Transosseous Button Technique for Rotator Cuff Repair

In an attempt to maximize stability by improving the lateral footprint compression of our repair in rotator cuff tears, we have been using a rotator cuff button (Arthrex, Naples, FL) passed through a transosseous tunnel as an anchor for our transosseous sutures. Our new innovation is to pass a rotator cuff button fully loaded with 4 strands around the central post, with 2 leading strands and 2 trailing strands on either end, through our transosseous tunnel. In this way, we can use the 4 central strands through our tunnel to obtain 2 good mattress sutures as a primary repair and the peripheral 4 strands passed around the lateral humerus as over sew mattress sutures to obtain good compression of the lateral tendon and so improve the footprint area. A double row equivalent is achieved. This technique has a good primary hold in the form of a device with proven history and avoids multiple anchors in the lateral humerus. Because it uses only a single fixation device, it is also significantly more economical. Theoretical risks to the axillary nerve or with osteoporosis have not been seen in practice. Tensioning the repair with suture passage through transosseous tunnels is readily achieved.     

Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repairs: An Anatomic and Biomechanical Rationale for Different Suture-Anchor Repair Configurations

The goal of rotator cuff repairs is to achieve high initial fixation strength, minimize gap formation, maintain mechanical stability under cyclic loading, and optimize the biology of the tendon-bone interface until the cuff heals biologically to the bone. We have seen an evolution in our approaches to fixing rotator cuff tears from open to mini-open to all arthroscopic. In our arthroscopic techniques, we have also seen a change in the types of anchors and sutures we use and our repair techniques including an evolution in techniques that include single row, double row, and, most recently, transosseous equivalent fixation. Single-row repairs are least successful in restoring the footprint of the rotator cuff and are most susceptible to gap formation. Double-row repairs have an improved load to failure and minimal gap formation. Transosseous equivalent repairs have the highest ultimate load and resistance to shear and rotational forces and the lowest gap formation. This review will discuss the anatomy and biomechanics of a normal rotator cuff, the biomechanical factors that play a role in rotator cuff repairs, the initial fixation repair mechanics, and finally propose an algorithm for rotator cuff fixation based on tissue quality and tear configuration.     

关节镜辅助小切口肩袖修复术治疗肩袖撕裂

目的 探讨关节镜辅助小切口修复术治疗肩袖撕裂的临床效果. 方法 1999年3月～2004年3月应用关节镜辅助小切口修复术治疗肩袖撕裂22例.13例行关节镜检查,小切口肩峰下间隙减压及肩袖修复术;9例行关节镜下肩峰下间隙减压及小切口肩袖修复术.采用UCLA肩评分标准进行评价. 结果 22例随访12～72个月,平均47个月,UCLA评分由术前（14.8±3.8）分升至术后（32.0±4.7）分（t=15.086,P=0.000）.优7例,良13例,可1例,差1例;20例满意. 结论 关节镜辅助小切口修复术是治疗肩袖撕裂的有效方法,操作简单,创伤小.     

Clinical Evidence Shows No Difference Between Single- and Double-Row Repair for Rotator Cuff Tears

Tears of the rotator cuff may be repaired by single- or double-row techniques. Single-row methods do not restore the rotator cuff footprint but do provide a good functional outcome. We surveyed the literature to ascertain the origin of the current trend of using double-row methods of repair. The footprint repair is a benefit of double-row fixation with strong evidence of its biomechanical success. However, the functional outcome of double-row fixation is equivalent to single-row fixation. Given the lack of scientific evidence and despite the enthusiasm of surgeons for this new technique, single-row fixation remains an acceptable method for managing these injuries, and it is our opinion that it is the preferable method.     

Subacromial Internal Spacer for Rotator Cuff Tendon Repair: “The Balloon Technique”

Lateral reattachment of the rotator cuff and the more recent introduction of the double-row rotator cuff repair technique require adequate visualization to define the rotator cuff footprint and the greater tuberosity. In many cases extensive debridement in this area is required to remove the overlying subdeltoid bursa, which can impair visualization laterally on the proximal humerus. Inadequate visualization laterally may lead to improper placement of the lateral row of fixation, compromising the reduction and fixation of the repaired rotator cuff tendon. We describe a surgical technique used to improve lateral visualization of the proximal humerus for placement of lateral anchors during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using a Foley catheter. The end of a 14F-diameter Foley catheter is cut just proximal to the balloon end. One to three catheters are introduced in the subacromial space through small anterolateral or posterolateral portals and inflated with 15 mL of air. Adequate distension of the subacromial space allows better visualization, triangulation of the arthroscopic instruments, and anatomic repair of the rotator cuff tendon.     

Artrhoscopic Rotator Cuff Repair with Augmentation: The V‐sled Technique

Numerous techniques have been described for patch positioning in rotator cuff shoulder arthroscopic surgery. These techniques seem to be difficult challenges for the majority of arthroscopic surgeons, and because of that they are called “highly demanding” techniques. Without the use of dedicated instruments and cannulas, the authors propose a V‐sled technique that seems to be more reproducible, quicker and less difficult to perform for arthroscopic shoulder surgeons. The patient is placed in the lateral position. All arthroscopic procedures are performed without the use of cannulas. The standard posterior portal is used for the glenohumeral (GH) joint arthroscopy with fluid inflowing through the scope. After an accurate evaluation of the GH space, the scope is then introduced into the subacromial space. With the use of a spinal needle, a lateral portal is performed. The great tuberosity is prepared with a bur to place two 5.5 mm triple‐loaded radiolucent anchors. In addition, two free high strength sutures are passed through the muscle, respectively. The repair is performed using two high strength sutures from each anchor. The third wire from each anchor is retrieved out of the accessories portals used for the insertion of the anchors. In addition, two free high strength sutures are passed through the muscle, and the patch sizing is done using a measuring probe introduced through the lateral portal. Next, the patch is then prepared and is introduced into the subacromial space, and then the patch is stabilized, and the free sutures are tied.     

Heterotopic Ossification After Minimally Invasive Rotator Cuff Repair

Heterotopic ossification is a common phenomenon after spinal cord injury, head injury, neurologic disorders, burns and other trauma, and joint arthroplasty. Periarticular ossifications after shoulder surgery have been known to occur since the 19th century, at an incidence of up to 27%. After arthroscopic and minimally invasive shoulder surgical procedures were introduced and came into broad use, reports about heterotopic ossification became very rare. We describe here a case of heterotopic bone formation in the subdeltoid fascia after arthroscopic subacromial decompression, acromioclavicular joint resection, and mini-open rotator cuff reconstruction were performed with 2 absorbable suture anchors 3 months postoperatively. Computed tomography (CT) confirmed a massive heterotopic ossification of the deltoid muscle. During revision surgery, a 4 × 6.5-cm bone shell that consisted primarily of immature trabecular bone and lamellar bone in smaller proportions was removed. The case presented here is unique in the scientific literature. Although risk factors have been identified, the underlying pathomorphogenetic mechanism of such heterotopic bone formation remains unclear. Prophylactic administration of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or radiation for arthroscopic or minimally invasive shoulder surgery is not justified, given the low incidence of heterotopic ossification and the known adverse effects. Apparently, information on basic science and on evidence-based therapy is lacking.     

The Factors Affecting Pain Pattern after Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair

Background

We evaluated the factors that affect pain pattern after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

Methods

From June 2009 to October 2010, 210 patients underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair operations. Of them, 84 patients were enrolled as subjects of the present study. The evaluation of postoperative pain was conducted by visual analog scale (VAS) scores during postoperative outpatient interviews at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months. The factors that were thought to affect postoperative pain were evaluated by dividing into three categories: preoperative, operative, and postoperative.

Results

Pain after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery showed a strictly decreasing pain pattern. In single analysis and multiple regression tests for factors influencing the strictly decreasing pain pattern, initial VAS and pain onset were shown to be statistically significant factors (p = 0.012, 0.012, 0.044 and 0.028, respectively). With regard to the factors influencing lower than average intensity pain pattern for each period, the stiffness of internal rotation at 3 months postoperatively was shown to be a statistically significant factor in single and multiple regression tests (p = 0.017 and p = 0.004, respectively).

Conclusions

High initial VAS scores and the acute onset of pain affected the strictly decreasing postoperative pain pattern. Additionally, stiffness of internal rotation at postoperative 3 months affected the higher than average intensity pain pattern for each period after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.