A Novel Transosseous Button Technique for Rotator Cuff Repair

In an attempt to maximize stability by improving the lateral footprint compression of our repair in rotator cuff tears, we have been using a rotator cuff button (Arthrex, Naples, FL) passed through a transosseous tunnel as an anchor for our transosseous sutures. Our new innovation is to pass a rotator cuff button fully loaded with 4 strands around the central post, with 2 leading strands and 2 trailing strands on either end, through our transosseous tunnel. In this way, we can use the 4 central strands through our tunnel to obtain 2 good mattress sutures as a primary repair and the peripheral 4 strands passed around the lateral humerus as over sew mattress sutures to obtain good compression of the lateral tendon and so improve the footprint area. A double row equivalent is achieved. This technique has a good primary hold in the form of a device with proven history and avoids multiple anchors in the lateral humerus. Because it uses only a single fixation device, it is also significantly more economical. Theoretical risks to the axillary nerve or with osteoporosis have not been seen in practice. Tensioning the repair with suture passage through transosseous tunnels is readily achieved.     

The Double-Pulley Technique for Double-Row Rotator Cuff Repair

In an effort to maximize the area of footprint coverage, we developed the “double-pulley technique” for double-row rotator cuff repairs. Two suture anchors are inserted at the articular margin of the greater tuberosity (one anterior and one posterior). All 4 suture strands from each anchor are passed through a single medial point on the torn cuff. In this way, the 4 suture strands from the anteromedial anchor pass through 1 point in the cuff and the 4 strands from the posteromedial anchor pass through a different point in the cuff. A suture strand from 1 anchor is tied extracorporeally to a suture strand of the same color from the other anchor. The other ends of those 2 strands are then pulled, thereby delivering this extracorporeal knot into the joint and over the medial footprint. These 2 free suture strands are then tied together as a static knot. The procedure is repeated with the other sutures. This technique creates a double mattress suture medially, which compresses the intervening tendon bridge against its bone bed. We call this procedure the double-pulley technique because it uses the anchor eyelets as pulleys to deliver the extracorporeal knot into the shoulder. After the lateral row repair is performed, the rotator cuff footprint will be completely reconstituted.     

关节镜辅助小切口肩袖修复术治疗肩袖撕裂

目的 探讨关节镜辅助小切口修复术治疗肩袖撕裂的临床效果. 方法 1999年3月～2004年3月应用关节镜辅助小切口修复术治疗肩袖撕裂22例.13例行关节镜检查,小切口肩峰下间隙减压及肩袖修复术;9例行关节镜下肩峰下间隙减压及小切口肩袖修复术.采用UCLA肩评分标准进行评价. 结果 22例随访12～72个月,平均47个月,UCLA评分由术前（14.8±3.8）分升至术后（32.0±4.7）分（t=15.086,P=0.000）.优7例,良13例,可1例,差1例;20例满意. 结论 关节镜辅助小切口修复术是治疗肩袖撕裂的有效方法,操作简单,创伤小.     

肩关节镜下缝线桥技术治疗巨大肩袖撕裂的前瞻性研究

目的 探讨肩关节镜下缝线桥技术治疗巨大肩袖损伤的临床效果。方法 选取我科2018年1月至2020年9月收治的肩袖巨大撕裂病人120例,随机纳入单排缝合组、双排缝合组和缝线桥组,每组40例。比较三组病人治疗前后肩关节疼痛视觉模拟量表（visual analogue scale,VAS）评分、肩关节Constant-Murley功能评分、加州大学洛杉矶分校（University of California at Los Angeles,UCLA）肩关节评分和美国肩肘外科协会（American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons,ASES）评分及术后并发症发生情况。结果三组病人术后3个月时VAS评分未见明显统计学差异,但是缝线桥组术后6个月及9个月时VAS评分较单排缝合及双排缝合组明显降低,差异具有统计学意义（P<0.05）;术后3、6、12、24个月,缝线桥组的Constant-Murley功能评分、UCLA评分和ASES评分均较单排缝合组及双排缝合组明显增高,差异具有统计学意义（P<0.05）;缝线桥组病人再撕裂发生率较单排缝合组及双排缝合组明显降低,差异...     

Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Using a Triple-Loaded Suture Anchor and a Modified Mason-Allen Technique (Alex Stitch)

Surgical repair of the rotator cuff must have good resistance and should restore the tendon footprint. To attain this goal, a stitch with a strong biomechanical profile that avoids tissue strangulation should be used. We describe an arthroscopic suture technique undertaken to repair rotator cuff tears with a single triple-loaded suture anchor. The technique consists of a combination of a horizontal mattress and 2 vertical simple sutures that are positioned medial to the mattress suture. The suture anchor used is the 5-mm self-tapping ThRevo (Linvatec). This anchor is loaded with 3 sutures: 2 No. 2 nonabsorbable braided polyester sutures of different colors and a central high-strength No. 2 polyethylene suture. The shape of the anchor eyelet permits all 3 sutures to glide freely. A modified Mason-Allen technique (Alex stitch) that combines a horizontal side-to-side suture and 2 simples sutures as vertical loops is used. With use of the Spectrum suture passing device and shuttle relay system (Linvatec), both limbs of the centrally located polyethylene suture are passed through the cuff from bottom to top, approximately 1 cm from the tendon edge. This suture is not immediately tied. Next, with use of the same system, the other 2 sutures are placed medially and over the previous horizontal suture. Simple sutures are placed at an approximately 30° angle from the center of the anchor; 1 is placed anterior and the other posterior. The sutures are tied through the lateral portal. The mattress horizontal central stitch is always tied first, followed by the 2 vertical sutures. The horizontal mattress suture serves as a “rip stop stitch” and theoretically reduces the possibility of cutting out of the simple sutures.     

Clinical and Radiological Evaluation after Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Using Suture Bridge Technique

Background

We retrospectively assessed the clinical outcomes and investigated risk factors influencing retear after arthroscopic suture bridge repair technique for rotator cuff tear through clinical assessment and magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA).

Methods

Between January 2008 and April 2011, sixty-two cases of full-thickness rotator cuff tear were treated with arthroscopic suture bridge repair technique and follow-up MRA were performed. The mean age was 56.1 years, and mean follow-up period was 27.4 months. Clinical and functional outcomes were assessed using range of motion, Korean shoulder score, Constant score, and UCLA score. Radiological outcome was evaluated with preoperative and follow-up MRA. Potential predictive factors that influenced cuff retear, such as age, gender, geometric patterns of tear, size of cuff tear, acromioplasty, fatty degeneration, atrophy of cuff muscle, retraction of supraspinatus, involved muscles of cuff and osteolysis around the suture anchor were evaluated.

Results

Thirty cases (48.4%) revealed retear on MRA. In univariable analysis, retear was significantly more frequent in over 60 years age group (62.5%) than under 60 years age group (39.5%; p = 0.043), and also in medium to large-sized tear than small-sized tear (p = 0.003). There was significant difference in geometric pattern of tear (p = 0.015). In multivariable analysis, only age (p = 0.036) and size of tear (p = 0.030) revealed a significant difference. The mean active range of motion for forward flexion, abduction, external rotation at the side and internal rotation at the side were significantly improved at follow-up (p < 0.05). The mean Korean shoulder score, Constant score, and UCLA score increased significantly at follow-up (p < 0.01). The range of motion, Korean shoulder score, Constant score, and UCLA score did not differ significantly between the groups with retear and intact repairs (p > 0.05). The locations of retear were insertion site in 10 cases (33.3%) and musculotendinous junction in 20 cases (66.7%; p = 0.006).

Conclusions

Suture bridge repair technique for rotator cuff tear showed improved clinical results. Cuff integrity after repair did not affect clinical results. Age of over 60 years and size of cuff tear larger than 1 cm were factors influencing rotator cuff retear after arthroscopic suture bridge repair technique.     

Current Biomechanical Concepts for Rotator Cuff Repair

For the past few decades, the repair of rotator cuff tears has evolved significantly with advances in arthroscopy techniques, suture anchors and instrumentation. From the biomechanical perspective, the focus in arthroscopic repair has been on increasing fixation strength and restoration of the footprint contact characteristics to provide early rehabilitation and improve healing. To accomplish these objectives, various repair strategies and construct configurations have been developed for rotator cuff repair with the understanding that many factors contribute to the structural integrity of the repaired construct. These include repaired rotator cuff tendon-footprint motion, increased tendon-footprint contact area and pressure, and tissue quality of tendon and bone. In addition, the healing response may be compromised by intrinsic factors such as decreased vascularity, hypoxia, and fibrocartilaginous changes or aforementioned extrinsic compression factors. Furthermore, it is well documented that torn rotator cuff muscles have a tendency to atrophy and become subject to fatty infiltration which may affect the longevity of the repair. Despite all the aforementioned factors, initial fixation strength is an essential consideration in optimizing rotator cuff repair. Therefore, numerous biomechanical studies have focused on elucidating the strongest devices, knots, and repair configurations to improve contact characteristics for rotator cuff repair. In this review, the biomechanical concepts behind current rotator cuff repair techniques will be reviewed and discussed.     

Artrhoscopic Rotator Cuff Repair with Augmentation: The V‐sled Technique

Numerous techniques have been described for patch positioning in rotator cuff shoulder arthroscopic surgery. These techniques seem to be difficult challenges for the majority of arthroscopic surgeons, and because of that they are called “highly demanding” techniques. Without the use of dedicated instruments and cannulas, the authors propose a V‐sled technique that seems to be more reproducible, quicker and less difficult to perform for arthroscopic shoulder surgeons. The patient is placed in the lateral position. All arthroscopic procedures are performed without the use of cannulas. The standard posterior portal is used for the glenohumeral (GH) joint arthroscopy with fluid inflowing through the scope. After an accurate evaluation of the GH space, the scope is then introduced into the subacromial space. With the use of a spinal needle, a lateral portal is performed. The great tuberosity is prepared with a bur to place two 5.5 mm triple‐loaded radiolucent anchors. In addition, two free high strength sutures are passed through the muscle, respectively. The repair is performed using two high strength sutures from each anchor. The third wire from each anchor is retrieved out of the accessories portals used for the insertion of the anchors. In addition, two free high strength sutures are passed through the muscle, and the patch sizing is done using a measuring probe introduced through the lateral portal. Next, the patch is then prepared and is introduced into the subacromial space, and then the patch is stabilized, and the free sutures are tied.     

Medial Rotator Cuff Failure After Arthroscopic Double-Row Rotator Cuff Repair

Persistent tendon defects after rotator cuff repair are not uncommon. Recently, the senior author has identified a subset of 5 patients (mean age, 52 years; range, 42 to 59 years) after arthroscopic double-row rotator cuff repair who showed an unusual mechanism of tendon failure. In these patients the tendon footprint appears well fixed to the greater tuberosity with normal thickness. However, medial to the intact footprint, the tendon is torn with full-thickness defects through the rotator cuff. All patients were involved in Workers' Compensation claims. Magnetic resonance arthrography showed an intact cuff footprint but dye leakage in all patients. Revision surgery was performed at a mean of 8.6 months after the index procedure and showed an intact rotator cuff footprint but cuff failure medial to the footprint. Four patients had repair of the defects by tendon-to-tendon side-to-side sutures, whereas one did not undergo repair. Medial-row failure of the rotator cuff is a previously unreported mechanism of failure after double-row rotator cuff repair. Given the small number of patients in this study, it is unclear whether these defects are symptomatic. However, repair of these defects resulted in improvement in pain in 4 of 5 patients.     

Arthroscopic Grafting of Greater Tuberosity Cyst and Rotator Cuff Repair

Cysts of the greater tuberosity can be a normal finding independent of age and concurrent rotator cuff tear. The presence of a large greater tuberosity cyst can present a challenge at the time of rotator cuff repair. We present a 1-step arthroscopic technique to address these defects at the time of rotator cuff repair using a synthetic graft (OsteoBiologics, San Antonio, TX) originally designed to address osteoarticular defects. With the viewing portal established laterally, a portal allowing perpendicular access to the cyst is established. The cyst is thoroughly debrided, and a drill sleeve is then introduced perpendicular to the surrounding bone, serving as a guide for the matching drill to create a circular socket. A correspondingly sized TruFit BGS cylindrical implant (OsteoBiologics) is then implanted by use of the included instrumentation. The scaffold is placed flush with the surrounding bone. Because our arthroscopic rotator cuff protocol uses a tension-band technique with placement of suture anchors distal and lateral to the rotator cuff footprint, we are subsequently able to proceed with routine rotator cuff repair.     

Arthroscopic Transosseous Reinsertion of the Rotator Cuff

Abstract Objective: Arthroscopic reinsertion of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendons by means of imitation of an open trans osseous reinsertion technique. Indications: Tears in the tendon cuffs of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus muscles. Patients < 75 years of age. Contraindications: Retracted tendons that cannot be sufficiently mobilized to provide a tension-free reinsertion. Tears of the tendon cuff of the subscapsularis muscle. Surgical Technique: The free edges of the tendons are sparingly resected. The tendon attachment site on the greater tuberosity is freed of soft tissue and decorticated using an arthroscopic bone burr. A full-radius burr is used to drill insertion sites for the sutures in the tuberosity. A hollow needle is inserted percutaneously to puncture the free edges of the tendon for a single reinsertion suture. The hollow needle is then fed through the greater tuberosity to the lateral portal. The suture is guided through the needle and advanced via a working cannula. If the tear is > 2 cm in width, a mattress suture should be placed via another channel in the bone. This is to provide plane contact of the tendon to the reinsertion site. Postoperative Management: Restriction of movement using a shoulder bandage for 6 weeks after the operation. Results: In the 75 patients treated using a single suture, there was an improvement compared to the related Constant Score from 55.8% before the operation to 80.4% at the follow-up examination, after an average of 26.8 months. The average age in this group was 58.2 years (range 35–75 years). In the 21 patients treated with a mattress suture, there was an improvement compared to the related Constant score from 59% before the operation to 83% at 14.3 months after the operation. The average age in this group was 58 years (range 35–75 years). The following is a reprint from Operat Orthop Traumatol 2006;18:1–18 and continues the new series of articles at providing continuing education on operative techniques to the European trauma community. Reprint from: Oper Orthop Traumatol 2006;18:1–18 DOI 10.1007/s00064-006-1159-1     

Biomechanical Fixation in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair

Rotator cuff repair remains a challenging and rapidly evolving field. Several recent studies have shown that arthroscopic repair yields functional results similar to those of mini-open and open procedures, with all of the benefits of minimally invasive surgery. However, the “best” repair construct remains relatively unknown, with wide variations in surgeon preference and conflicting evidence in the literature. The most recent developments in basic science, suture and suture anchor technology, and innovative prospects for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair are reviewed.