Long term results after cochlear implantation in elderly patients

BACKGROUND: Cochlear implantation has become the method of choice for the treatment of deaf patients. A better technology of stimulation opened a wider field of patients suitable for cochlear implantation. Aim of the present study was to evaluate to which extent senior patients benefit by cochlear implantation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 36 patients between 65 and 85 years were tested by the Freiburger speech test for monosyllabic words and by the HSM sentence test with and without noise. The results were compared to those of younger implanted patients (16 - 64 years, n = 101). RESULTS: The speech perception for monosyllabic words did not differ significantly between both groups. A maximum plateau in speech perception for monosyllabic words was reached after 2 years at 55 %. The HSM sentence test revealed significant differences in the increase of speech perception between senior and younger patients in the first post surgical year. After one year elderly patients reached the same perception score as younger patients with a maximum of approximately 80 % after 3 years. At a signal to noise ratio of 15 % younger patients achieved a maximal perception of 55 % after 1 year whereas senior patients needed 4 years to reach this level. CONCLUSIONS: Senior patients benefited by cochlear implantation to the same extent as younger patients did. Senior patients gained a similar speech perception level as younger implanted patients although the elderly needed more time to reach the same scores. Nevertheless, cochlear implantation should not be denied due to age alone.     

Speech perception in elderly patients following cochlear implantation

CONCLUSIONS: Elderly patients benefit from cochlear implantation in terms of speech perception and quality of life. Age alone should be no contraindication for implantation. OBJECTIVE: There have been concerns whether elderly patients may perform poorly after cochlear implantation due to degenerative processes in the central and peripheral auditory systems. The purpose of this study was to analyze the benefits of cochlear implantation in elderly patients in comparison to younger recipients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We examined 26 postlingually deafened adults aged > 65 years who received a cochlear implant at our center regarding preoperative findings, comorbidities, postoperative complications and quality of life. Speech perception was assessed by means of multi- and monosyllabic word recognition and compared to the results obtained by younger patients. RESULTS: The surgical procedure was well tolerated by all patients without notable perioperative complications. In terms of speech perception, no significant differences between the elderly patients and younger recipients were noted. All patients found that cochlear implantation had a positive impact on their quality of life.     

Speech perception in elderly patients following cochlear implantation

Conclusions. Elderly patients benefit from cochlear implantation in terms of speech perception and quality of life. Age alone should be no contraindication for implantation. Objective. There have been concerns whether elderly patients may perform poorly after cochlear implantation due to degenerative processes in the central and peripheral auditory systems. The purpose of this study was to analyze the benefits of cochlear implantation in elderly patients in comparison to younger recipients. Material and methods. We examined 26 postlingually deafened adults aged?>?65 years who received a cochlear implant at our center regarding preoperative findings, comorbidities, postoperative complications and quality of life. Speech perception was assessed by means of multi- and monosyllabic word recognition and compared to the results obtained by younger patients. Results. The surgical procedure was well tolerated by all patients without notable perioperative complications. In terms of speech perception, no significant differences between the elderly patients and younger recipients were noted. All patients found that cochlear implantation had a positive impact on their quality of life.     

Measuring progress in children with autism spectrum disorder who have cochlear implants

OBJECTIVE: To quantify progress after cochlear implantation for children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of speech and language and speech perception test scores of children with autism who have received a cochlear implant at our center. SETTING: University of Michigan Medical Center, Cochlear Implant Program. PATIENTS: Six children, ages 3 to 16 years, who received cochlear implants at the our center. All children were diagnosed as having ASD by a neuropsychologist, either before or after receiving a cochlear implant. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Children participated in preoperative and postoperative speech and language and speech perception testing. A survey was administered to parents to evaluate subjective impressions of cochlear implant benefit and quality of life before and after implantation. RESULTS: Improved scores were recorded for children on whom standardized expressive and receptive vocabulary testing was possible. Children who could not complete standardized tests demonstrated improvement in raw scores. Improvement on the Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale was noted for the 4 of 7 children who completed the scale preoperatively and postoperatively. Survey results suggested changes in responsiveness to sound, interest in music, vocalization, and eye contact following implantation. Five of the 6 families indicated that they would recommend a cochlear implant to another family in a similar situation. CONCLUSIONS: Gains made by children in our study were small compared with the general implant population; however, when compared with themselves preoperatively, these children did demonstrate progress. Improvements in behaviors and interaction point to a quality of life benefit following implantation that is difficult to quantify.     

Indications for and outcomes of mastoid obliteration in cochlear implantation.

OBJECTIVE: To review the indications, efficacy, and long-term outcomes of mastoid obliteration in cochlear implant surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case review. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Seventeen patients who underwent a mastoid obliteration procedure to facilitate the insertion of a cochlear implant between 1978 and 2005. INTERVENTION: Mastoid obliteration procedure before cochlear implantation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Revision rate of the mastoid obliteration and cochlear implantation, postoperative audiometric scores (consonant-nucleus-consonant words/phonemes, Central Institute for the Deaf sentences, City University New York sentences in quiet and in noise), and incidence of complications. RESULTS: There were 17 patients with a median age of 60 years (range, 3-79 yr). Eight patients required mastoid obliteration for active chronic suppurative otitis media before cochlear implantation. Another 8 patients had existing mastoid cavities requiring obliteration (modified radical [n = 5] and fenestration cavities [n = 3]). A single patient with a sclerotic mastoid and an anterior sigmoid sinus underwent obliteration because of inadequate surgical access. The technique of obliteration was radical mastoidectomy with eustachian tube occlusion, blind sac closure of the external auditory canal, and cavity obliteration with either temporalis muscle flap (n = 15) or abdominal fat (n = 2). Cochlear implantation and mastoid obliteration were performed as a two-stage procedure in 10 patients and as a single-stage procedure in 7. Two patients required revision of the mastoid obliteration. At follow-up, all patients had stable obliterated cavities. Fifteen patients obtained significant improvement in speech discrimination scores, whereas 2 patients obtained some benefit from the cochlear implant through the perception of environmental sounds. CONCLUSION: For patients with chronic suppurative otitis media or existing mastoid cavities, the obliteration with temporalis muscle or abdominal fat is an effective technique to facilitate safe cochlear implantation.     

Cochlear implantation in prelingually deafened children with residual hearing

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the speech perception skills of prelingually deafened French children with preoperative residual hearing who received multichannel cochlear implants. DESIGN: The design of the study incorporated a within-subject, repeated measures design for assessing speech perception skills. SETTING: Montpellier, Toulouse and Lyon Pediatric Cochlear Implant Centers. SUBJECTS: Seven prelingually deafened children demonstrating marginal benefit from conventional amplification prior to implantation with a Nucleus multichannel cochlear implant, served as subjects for the speech perception assessment (a speech recognition score less than 30% defines marginal benefit from acoustic amplification on open set materials). The mean age at implantation was 7 years, 9 months. OUTCOME MEASURES: Speech perception skills were assessed using open set materials and the MUSS and MAIS questionnaires. RESULTS: Open-set speech recognition averaged 21.4% before implantation, and 83.6% after 1 year's cochlear implant experience. All children demonstrated an open-set score over 60% after 12 months of CI use. MAIS test scores averaged 18.1/40 before implantation and 35.1/40 after 9 months of CI use. MUSS test scores averaged 24.4/40 before implantation and 34.1/40 after 9 months of CI use. CONCLUSIONS: Cochlear implantation should be considered for prelingually hearing impaired children demonstrating marginal benefit from hearing aids, with a speech recognition score less than 30% on open set materials, in order to improve their speech discrimination skills.     

The role of age in pediatric cochlear implantation

OBJECTIVE: To document progress, benefit and importance of age in paediatric cochlear implantation. DESIGN: The EARS (Evaluation of Auditory Responses to Speech) test battery was performed on 33 prelingually deaf children at regular intervals up to 36 months following implantation. All children participated in individually tailored intensive audiological rehabilitation programs after receiving their implants. In this respect, it was attempted to evaluate speech perception scores in children implanted before and after the age of 3 in a homogenous group. RESULTS: All children demonstrated encouraging improvements over time in their speech recognition abilities. Furthermore, it was observed that the children who were implanted under the age of 3 achieved higher levels of speech perception performance. CONCLUSION: In order to shorten the process of central maturation of the auditory system, it is desirable to implant the children as young as possible. Early intervention seems to be the ideal strategy in enabling prelingually deaf children to derive maximum benefit from cochlear implantation.     

Variables affecting speech perception in postlingually deaf adults following cochlear implantation

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the time span over which there is greatest improvement in postlingually deaf adults undergoing cochlear implantation. Additionally, to quantify potential patient and device factors that may predict the postoperative results. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A longitudinal study was conducted. Numbers, monosyllables and sentence test results were collected for 66 cochlear implant subjects [Combi 40/40 +, n = 60; Clarion HF2, n = 2; Nucleus 24m/k, n = 4] at regular intervals for up to 6 years following cochlear implantation. RESULTS: All patients showed a steady improvement over time on all tests. Progress during the first 12 months was statistically significant, with further improvements being recorded after the 12-month testing period. The duration of deafness and the number of electrodes (8 for the Combi 40, 12 for the Combi 40 + ) appeared to be weakly correlated with postoperative performance. Re-implantation after device failure had no negative effect on speech reception. Subjects who were "upgraded" from an analogue to a digital cochlear implant improved their test results almost twofold. CONCLUSION: All the patients in our study gained substantial benefit from their cochlear implants. It is encouraging to note that the factors examined were not deemed to be relevant predictors of performance. Even long-term deaf subjects and re-implantees are able to achieve an excellent level of speech perception.     

Connexin-associated deafness and speech perception outcome of cochlear implantation

OBJECTIVE: To compare performance after cochlear implantation in children with mutations in connexin (Cx) 26 (GJB2) or Cx30 (GJB6) and children with deafness of unknown etiology. DESIGN: Genetic analysis and speech perception evaluation was performed in the children with and without Cx mutations who had undergone cochlear implantation. Speech perception performance was retrospectively analyzed 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 months after implantation. Test material was selected according to the child's age and cognitive and language abilities. SETTING: The study took place at speech and hearing and genetic centers of a hospital in the central part of Israel and the genetics departments of 3 additional centrally located hospitals. PATIENTS: A total of 30 children who had undergone cochlear implantation were selected for the study, with control patients matched according to age at implantation, duration of implant use, and mode of communication. There was no evidence for additional disabilities or handicaps in either group. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Speech perception measurements included a questionnaire, as well as closed and open-set tests. RESULTS: Overall, the 2 groups showed significant improvement in speech perception results after implantation. Four years after implantation, both groups achieved mean open-set speech perception scores of approximately 60%, 75%, and 90% for monosyllabic, 2 syllables, and words in sentences tests, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: There were no apparent differences in speech perception performance after implantation between the children with Cx mutations and children with deafness of unknown etiology. These data have important implications as a prognostic indicator when counseling candidates for cochlear implantation.     

Cochlear implant outcomes in the elderly.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to review cochlear implantation with respect to surgical and auditory outcomes in subjects aged 70 years and older. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: Tertiary referral centers. PATIENTS: Sixty-five patients aged 70 years or older at the time of implantation were compared to a group of patients aged <70 years. INTERVENTION: Patients underwent multichannel cochlear implantation with either the Clarion or Nucleus device. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Presence or absence of surgical complications and auditory performance with open-set word and sentence recognition testing. RESULTS: In patients implanted at age 70 or older, significant improvement in speech understanding was demonstrated in performance scores using Consonant Nucleus Consonant words, Central Institute for the Deaf sentences, and Hearing in Noise Test sentences at 3, 6, and 12 months when compared to preimplantation scores. However, their performance was slightly poorer when compared to a control group of patients <70 years of age in the same measures at 3, 6, and 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: The elderly population showed significant improvement in auditory performance tests following cochlear implantation compared to their preimplantation scores but performed less well than younger patients.     

Speech perception after cochlear implantation over a 4-year time period

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term speech perception of cochlear implantees and to compare the developing auditory performance patterns of prelingual children and postlingual deaf adults. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-nine prelingually deaf children and 17 postlingually deaf adults who had been followed up for 4 years were included in the study. Speech perception ability was assessed by means of vowel and consonant confusion tests and the Korean version of the Central Institute of Deafness (K-CID) test (performed without visual cues). The test results were analyzed at 3 and 6 months after implantation and then annually. RESULTS: In the prelingually deaf children, the average results continuously improved over the 4-year period. In the postlingually deaf adults, the average results did not improve further after the first 2 years. Individuals with < 5 years of deafness had a faster rate of recovery of speech perception than those who had been deaf for > 5 years. The K-CID scores were negatively correlated with age at implantation for the prelingually deaf group and with the duration of deafness in the postlingually deaf group. Children fitted with implants at a younger age showed better speech perception ability than those fitted with implants at an older age. Interestingly, prelingually deaf children aged 5-7 years at implantation showed the widest variation in individual outcomes. Amongst this group of children with highly variable outcomes, the metabolic status of brain cortices determined by means of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) was available for three patients. The individual with the widest hypometabolic area had the best speech perception ability. CONCLUSION: The extent of hypometabolism as assessed by FDG-PET seemed to be one of the major factors predicting the outcome of cochlear implantation.     

Outcomes for cochlear implant users with significant residual hearing: implications for selection criteria in children

OBJECTIVES: To develop an evidence-based technique for providing recommendations to candidates for cochlear implantation with significant residual hearing and to assess the efficacy of the approach. DESIGN: Modified selection criteria were derived from an analysis of the postoperative performance for a large group of adult cochlear implant users. In particular, the distributions of results for implant users with significant preoperative open-set speech perception were reviewed. This suggested that the candidates had a good chance (>75%) of overall improvement if they obtained open-set sentence scores in quiet of up to 70% in the best-aided condition and scores of up to 40% in the ear to undergo implantation. PATIENTS: A group of 45 adult implantation candidates who fit the modified criteria and who underwent preimplantation and postimplantation assessment to compare actual results with those predicted from the distributions. RESULTS: The speech perception results showed that 36 subjects (80%) had improved open-set sentence scores with the cochlear implant compared with their best-aided preoperative performance (mean improvement, 20.5%). Forty-four (98%) had improved open-set sentence scores for the ear undergoing implantation (mean improvement, 65.3%). CONCLUSIONS: The general concept of using the distribution of speech perception results to make evidence-based recommendations for candidates for cochlear implants is supported by this study. The approach can be used across different subpopulations, including older children with significant residual auditory skills, and for different outcome measures. It is important that the data used to provide recommendations and modify selection criteria are from an unselected sample of implant users of adequate size. This study highlights the continuing need to evaluate speech perception performance carefully before and after cochlear implantation.     

Evidence-based guidelines for recommending cochlear implantation for young children: Audiological criteria and optimizing age at implantation

Abstract

Objective: Establish up-to-date evidence-based guidelines for recommending cochlear implantation for young children. Design: Speech perception results for early-implanted children were compared to children using traditional amplification. Equivalent pure-tone average (PTA) hearing loss for cochlear implant (CI) users was established. Language of early-implanted children was assessed over six years and compared to hearing peers. Study sample: Seventy-eight children using CIs and 62 children using traditional amplification with hearing losses ranging 25–120?dB HL PTA (speech perception study). Thirty-two children who received a CI before 2.5 years of age (language study). Results: Speech perception outcomes suggested that children with a PTA greater than 60?dB HL have a 75% chance of benefit over traditional amplification. More conservative criteria applied to the data suggested that children with PTA greater than 82?dB HL have a 95% chance of benefit. Children implanted under 2.5 years with no significant cognitive deficits made normal language progress but retained a delay approximately equal to their age at implantation. Conclusions: Hearing-impaired children under three years of age may benefit from cochlear implantation if their PTA exceeds 60?dB HL bilaterally. Implantation as young as possible should minimize any language delay resulting from an initial period of auditory deprivation.     

Auditory perception and speech identification in children with cochlear implants tested with the EARS protocol

The performance of children who receive a cochlear implant may be dependent on both age of the child at implantation and the amount of experience with the implant. In the present study, changes in auditory perception and speech identification were investigated with experience of 71 children who had received a cochlear implant. The children were divided into three groups, those above and those below the age of 7 years at the time of implantation, and those aged 3 years or younger deafened by meningitis. The children received either the Nucleus 22, the Nucleus 24 or the Med El C40+ implant. The test material was a reduced form of the EARS evaluation protocol developed by Med El into a multi-language format. Tests were performed pre-operatively, within 2-5 days of first fitting of the speech processor, then at 1, 3 and 6 months and every 6 months thereafter, for a total period of 24 months. The results indicated that all children showed improvement after 6-12 months. The rate of improvement differed between age groups. Children over 7 years of age had pre-operatively higher test scores than younger children, presumably because of their previous experience with hearing aids. These children showed an immediate post-operative drop in performance that recovered 1-3 months later. The children aged under 7 years started at lower performance levels but approached those of the older children after 12 months' cochlear implant use because their post-operative drop was less significant and their performance improved faster. Children who had been deafened by meningitis and implanted at the age of 3 or less made little progress over the first 6 months but approached test levels of the under-7-year-olds by 18 months or later. All three components of the evaluation protocol employed the Listening Progress Profile (LiP), the Monosyllabic-Trochee-Polysyllabic Test (MTP) and the Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale (MAIS) and proved to be valuable in demonstrating improvement in performance of cochlear implant children in all age groups once the immediate post-operative drop had been overcome.     

The benefit of cochlear implantation in the Japanese elderly

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the benefit of cochlear implant for Japanese elderly people with profound hearing loss. A questionnaire was administered to the five Japanese elderly people over 65 years old with the Nucleus 22 channel device and their family. The questionnaire was designed to gain insight into the patient's daily use and to evaluate the quality of life. Elderly patients who were implanted with the Nucleus device showed good ability to identify environmental sound and revealed no significant deterioration compared to younger patients. Implanted patients showed some difficulties in understanding speech in the noisy environment and conversation among several persons. Nevertheless, 80% of patients over 65 and their family reported communication benefits in the family and in social activities. In addition, 80% of the patients reported that they felt the better or improved quality of life after the implantation. All patients considered the implant was good for their life and would recommend a cochlear implant to a deaf friend. It is notable that 60% of patients and their family report that the recipients have become more cheerful. This study showed the cochlear implant contributes to the better quality of life in the Japanese elderly.     

Changes in educational placement and speech perception ability after cochlear implantation in children

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect and relationship of paediatric cochlear implantation on educational placement and speech perception ability and to determine the effect of a multilingual background on educational placement and speech perception ability after cochlear implantation. DESIGN: This study consisted of a retrospective chart review of 83 implanted patients and a questionnaire sent to parents of 80 implanted children. SETTING: This study was conducted in a cochlear implant program at a tertiary care centre. METHODS AND OUTCOME MEASURES: From the chart review, the educational placements and speech perception scores of implanted children were determined before and after implantation. In the questionnaire, parents were asked about their preferred educational placement for their child, the language spoken at home, and their impressions of the chosen school program for their child. RESULTS: Of the children who were in nonmainstream school programs at implantation (n = 30), 50% moved toward mainstream with 9 (30%) reaching mainstream placement. Of the children who were preschool at implantation (n = 34), 24 (70%) were placed or planned to be placed in mainstream after implantation. The rate of improvement in speech perception ability was significantly higher in those children who moved toward or remained in mainstream than those who stayed at the same nonmainstream educational placement or moved away from mainstream. Children from a multilingual background were able to achieve similar educational placements and similar rates of progress of speech perception outcome as the only English-speaking children. CONCLUSIONS: Children with cochlear implants have increased educational opportunities, with those children in mainstream and those who have moved toward mainstream demonstrating improved progress in speech perception ability.     

Speech perception of Mandarin Chinese speaking young children after cochlear implant use: effect of age at implantation

OBJECTIVE: The purposes of this study were to examine (1). whether the benefit of cochlear implants in Mandarin-speaking congenitally deaf children persists over a 2-year follow-up period, and (2). whether the age of the child at implantation affects the acquisition of speech perception by young deafened children. METHOD: Sixteen congenitally deaf children received implants of Nucleus CI24M devices. Speech perception tests were conducted using the Mandarin Auditory Perception Test Battery at 6-month intervals after connection of the device. We determined the benefit of cochlear implants by monitoring percent correct scores between 12 and 24 months after implantation. Regression analysis was used to correlate the measures of progress and the age at implantation. RESULTS: In the comparison of performance at 12 and 24 months post-connection, subjects performed significantly better at 24 than at 12 months in spondee, vowel, and consonant tests (P<0.05). In phrase and sentence tests, the mean score improved over time with device use, but the difference was not significant (P=0.066 and 0.067, respectively). However, no obvious improvement in average score was found in tone tests (P=0.386). Progress (improvement in speech perception) at 12 and 24 months had moderate negative correlations with age at implantation in spondee, vowel, phrase and sentence tests (P<0.05), but no correlation with age in consonant (P=0.20) and tone tests (P=0.26). CONCLUSION: The result, in accordance with the reports on Western language-speaking children, showed cochlear implants increasingly benefit Mandarin-speaking congenitally deaf children over a 2-year post-implantation period. Because age at implantation negatively correlates with improved speech perception after implantation, congenitally affected children with profound deafness (if they cannot obtain enough benefit from hearing aids) should receive implants as early as possible.     

Variables Affecting Speech Perception in Postlingually Deaf Adults Following Cochlear Implantation

Objective--To evaluate the time span over which there is greatest improvement in postlingually deaf adults undergoing cochlear implantation. Additionally, to quantify potential patient and device factors that may predict the postoperative results. Material and methods--A longitudinal study was conducted. Numbers, monosyllables and sentence test results were collected for 66 cochlear implant subjects [Combi 40/40+, n=60; Clarion HF2, n=2; Nucleus 24m/k, n=4] at regular intervals for up to 6 years following cochlear implantation. Results--All patients showed a steady improvement over time on all tests. Progress during the first 12 months was statistically significant, with further improvements being recorded after the 12-month testing period. The duration of deafness and the number of electrodes (8 for the Combi 40, 12 for the Combi 40+) appeared to be weakly correlated with postoperative performance. Re-implantation after device failure had no negative effect on speech reception. Subjects who were "upgraded" from an analogue to a digital cochlear implant improved their test results almost twofold. Conclusion--All the patients in our study gained substantial benefit from their cochlear implants. It is encouraging to note that the factors examined were not deemed to be relevant predictors of performance. Even long-term deaf subjects and re-implantees are able to achieve an excellent level of speech perception.     

The effects of cochlear implantation on quality of life in the elderly

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the benefits of unilateral cochlear implant (CI) in patients over 60 on speech perception and quality of life, comparing the results obtained with a control group of younger CI recipients. Twenty CI users (mean age 72 years), postlingually deafened, were included in this study. Audiological performance was evaluated using bisyllabic words and sentences recognition tests in a quiet and a noise environment. Moreover, we administered two questionnaires to evaluate the health status (SF-36), CI-related effects on daily activities and personal satisfaction (Questionnaire for self-evaluation of CI benefit with SADL scale modification). Performance measures of the geriatric population showed a significant benefit on speech recognition tests compared to pre-implantation condition, even if younger CI users scored significantly better in both bisyllabic words and sentences recognition test. All study patients reported being able to have a normal conversation with an acquaintance. No significant difference was found between the study and control group in physical and mental health status, conversation with an outsider, use of TV and phone. A significant difference (p < 0.05) was noticed, instead, between elderly and younger adult patients about the overall satisfaction derived from CI. Our findings confirm the indisputable utility of CI and provide evidence that elderly patients derive a substantial benefit from it on quality of life, as demonstrated by health status, success in the common activities of daily living and perceived satisfaction after this procedure.     

Receptive language as a predictor of cochlear implant outcome for prelingually deaf adults

Abstract

Objective: This study investigated outcomes and predictive factors, specifically language skills, for a group of prelingually hearing-impaired adults who received a cochlear implant. Design: Speech perception data, demographic information, and other related variables such as communication mode, residual hearing, and receptive language abilities were explored. Pre- and post-implant speech perception scores were compared and multiple regression analysis was used to identify significant predictive relationships. Study sample: The study included 43 adults with a prelingual onset of hearing loss, who proceeded with cochlear implantation at the Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital in Melbourne, Australia. Results: The majority of patients experienced benefit from their cochlear implants, with 88% demonstrating significant improvement in speech perception performance. Volunteers achieved better post-operative speech perception scores if they had a shorter duration of severe-to-profound hearing loss, better language skills, and used an exclusively oral communication mode. Conclusions: Although post-operative speech perception performance is significantly poorer for prelingually hearing-impaired adults compared to postlingually hearing-impaired patients, the study group demonstrated significant benefit from their cochlear implants. The variability in post-operative outcomes can be predicted to some extent from the hearing history and language abilities of the individual patient.