Prognosis of "masked" hypertension and "white-coat" hypertension detected by 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring 10-year follow-up from the Ohasama study

OBJECTIVES: We sought to investigate the prognosis in subjects with "white-coat" hypertension (WCHT) and "masked" hypertension (MHT), in which blood pressure (BP) is lower in clinical measurements than during ambulatory monitoring. BACKGROUND: The prognostic significance of WCHT remains controversial, and little is known about MHT. METHODS: We obtained 24-h ambulatory BP and "casual" BP (i.e., obtained in clinical scenarios) values from 1,332 subjects (872 women, 460 men) > or =40 years old in a representative sample of the general population of a Japanese community. Survival and stroke morbidity were then followed up for a mean duration of 10 years. RESULTS: Composite risk of cardiovascular mortality and stroke morbidity examined using a Cox proportional hazards regression model for subjects with WCHT (casual BP > or =140/90 mm Hg, daytime BP <135/85 mm Hg; relative hazards [RH])1.28; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.76 to 2.14) was no different from risk for subjects with sustained normal BP (casual BP <140/90 mm Hg, daytime BP <135/85 mm Hg). However, risk was significantly higher for subjects with MHT (casual BP <140/90 mm Hg, daytime BP > or =135/85 mm Hg; RH 2.13; 95% CI 1.38 to 3.29) or sustained hypertension (casual BP > or =140/90 mm Hg, daytime BP > or =135/85 mm Hg; RH 2.26; 95% CI 1.49 to 3.41) than for subjects with sustained normal BP. Similar findings were observed for cardiovascular mortality and stroke morbidity among subgroups by gender, use of antihypertensive medication, and risk factor level (all p for heterogeneity >0.2). CONCLUSIONS: Conventional BP measurements may not identify some individuals at high or low risk, but these people may be identifiable by the use of ambulatory BP.     

White-coat hypertension as a risk factor for the development of home hypertension: the Ohasama study

BACKGROUND: White-coat hypertension is a condition characterized by elevated blood pressure (BP) in medical settings combined with normal ambulatory-recorded BP or self-measured BP at home (home BP). However, it is unknown whether this condition represents a transient state in the development of hypertension outside medical settings. METHODS: We followed up 128 subjects with white-coat hypertension (home BP <135/85 mm Hg and office BP > or = 140/90 mm Hg) for 8 years and compared the risk of progression with home hypertension (home BP > or = 135/85 mm Hg or start of treatment with antihypertensive medication) with 649 sustained normotensive subjects (home BP <135/85 mm Hg and office BP <140/90 mm Hg) using data from population-based home BP measurement projects in Japan. RESULTS: During the 8-year follow-up period, 60 subjects (46.9%) with white-coat hypertension and 144 (22.2%) with sustained normotension progressed to home hypertension. The odds ratio of subjects with white-coat hypertension for progression to home hypertension (adjusted for possible confounding factors) was significantly higher than for subjects with sustained normotension (odds ratio, 2.86; P<.001). This association was observed independent of baseline home BP levels. CONCLUSION: The results from the present 8-year follow-up study demonstrate that white-coat hypertension is a transitional condition to hypertension outside medical settings, suggesting that white-coat hypertension may carry a poor cardiovascular prognosis.     

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and risk of cardiovascular disease: a population based study

BACKGROUND: Information on the relationship between ambulatory blood pressure (BP) and cardiovascular disease in the general population is sparse. METHODS: Prospective study of a random sample of 1700 Danish men and women, aged 41 to 72 years, without major cardiovascular diseases. At baseline, ambulatory BP, office BP, and other risk factors were recorded. The end point was a combined end point consisting of cardiovascular mortality, ischemic heart disease, and stroke. RESULTS: After a mean follow-up of 9.5 years, 156 end points were recorded. In multivariate models, the relative risk (95% confidence interval) associated with increments of 10/5 mmHg of systolic/diastolic ambulatory BP were 1.35 (1.21-1.50) and 1.27 (1.16-1.39). The corresponding figures for office BP were 1.18 (1.09-1.29) and 1.11 (1.03-1.19). Compared with normotension (office BP <140/90 mm Hg; daytime BP <135/85 mm Hg) the relative risks associated with isolated office hypertension (office BP >/=140/90 mm Hg; daytime BP <135/85 mm Hg), isolated ambulatory hypertension (office BP <140/90 mm Hg; daytime BP >/=135/85 mm Hg), and sustained hypertension (office BP >/=140/90 mm Hg; daytime BP >/=135/85 mm Hg) were 0.66 (0.30-1.44), 1.52 (0.91-2.54), and 2.10 (1.45-3.06), respectively. A blunted BP decrease at night was a risk factor (P = .02) in subjects with daytime ambulatory hypertension, but not in subjects with daytime ambulatory normotension (P = .13). CONCLUSIONS: Ambulatory BP provided prognostic information about cardiovascular disease better than office BP. Isolated office hypertension was not a risk factor and isolated ambulatory hypertension tended to be associated with increased risk. A blunted BP decrease at night was a risk factor in subjects with daytime ambulatory hypertension.     

Correlation of repeated measurements of home blood pressure on one occasion and diagnosis of hypertension: study by measurement over seven consecutive days

In spite of the recent recognition of the usefulness of home blood pressure (BP) measurement, there are no clear guidelines for which measurements should be used for clinical evaluation. Therefore, the present study examined the correlation of repeated measurements of home BP on one occasion and the diagnosis of hypertension (HT) or normotension (NT). Home BP was measured with 700 volunteers aged 20 years or older (468 male and 232 female, mean age 40.6 years) in a sitting position three times each in the morning and evening for seven consecutive days. Excluding the measurements on the first day, the mean values were calculated for the first measurement (group A), second measurement (group B), the mean of the first and second measurements (group C), and the mean of the second and third measurements (group D). The correlation with the frequency of diagnosis of HT (>/=135/85 mmHg) and NT (<125/80 mmHg) was studied. Home BP in the morning and evening were both highest in group A (morning: 122.1 +/-0.6 (SEM)/75.9 +/-0.4 mmHg, evening: 120.4 +/-0.6/71.8 +/-0.4 mmHg) and lowest in group D (morning: 119.5 +/-0.6 / 75.2 +/-0.4 mmHg, evening: 117.5 +/-0.6/70.6 +/-0.4 mmHg). Using morning home BP, HT was diagnosed more often in group A (27.4%) than in group D (24.7%), with a lower frequency of NT diagnosis (55.7% vs. 61.7%; p = 0.06). With regard to the diagnosis made from evening home BP, HT was diagnosed more often and NT was diagnosed less often in group A (HT/NT: 18.4%/61.4%) than in group D (13.7%/68.0%), with statistical significance (p = 0.02). In conclusion, when the clinical diagnosis was made from seven-day home BP, the diagnosis of HT was made more frequently and NT diagnosis was made less frequently using the first measurement than the mean of the second and third measurements. This trend was more pronounced when diagnosis was made from evening home BP.     

Cardiovascular outcome in treated hypertensive patients with responder, masked, false resistant, and true resistant hypertension

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the cardiovascular outcome in apparently responder hypertensive patients with responder and masked hypertension, and in apparently resistant hypertensive patients with false and true resistant hypertension. METHODS: The occurrence of fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events was evaluated in 340 patients with responder hypertension (clinic blood pressure [BP] <140/90 mm Hg and daytime BP <135/85 mm Hg), 126 with masked hypertension (clinic BP <140/90 mm Hg and daytime BP >135 or 85 mm Hg), 146 with false resistant hypertension (clinic BP >or=140 or 90 mm Hg and daytime BP <135/85 mm Hg), and 130 with true resistant hypertension (clinic BP >or=140 or 90 mm Hg and daytime BP >135 or 85 mm Hg). RESULTS: During follow-up period (4.98 +/- 2.9 years), the event-rate per 100 patient-years was 0.87, 2.42, 1.2, and 4.1 in patients with responder, masked, false resistant, and true resistant hypertension, respectively. After adjustment for several covariates, including clinic BP (forced into the model), Cox regression analysis showed that cardiovascular risk was significantly higher in masked hypertension (masked versus responder hypertension, relative risk [RR] 2.28, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-4.7, P < .05) and in true resistant hypertension (true resistant versus responder hypertension, RR 2.94, 95% CI 1.02-8.41, P < .05), whereas there was no significant difference between false resistant and responder hypertension. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that patients with masked hypertension are at higher risk than those with responder hypertension, and that those with false resistant hypertension are at lower risk than those with true resistant hypertension. Ambulatory BP monitoring should be performed in treated hypertensive patients to obtain a better prognostic stratification.     

Correlation of Repeated Measurements of Home Blood Pressure on One Occasion and Diagnosis of Hypertension: Study by Measurement over Seven Consecutive Days

In spite of the recent recognition of the usefulness of home blood pressure (BP) measurement, there are no clear guidelines for which measurements should be used for clinical evaluation. Therefore, the present study examined the correlation of repeated measurements of home BP on one occasion and the diagnosis of hypertension (HT) or normotension (NT). Home BP was measured with 700 volunteers aged 20 years or older (468 male and 232 female, mean age 40.6 years) in a sitting position three times each in the morning and evening for seven consecutive days. Excluding the measurements on the first day, the mean values were calculated for the first measurement (group A), second measurement (group B), the mean of the first and second measurements (group C), and the mean of the second and third measurements (group D). The correlation with the frequency of diagnosis of HT (≥135/85 mmHg) and NT (<125/80 mmHg) was studied. Home BP in the morning and evening were both highest in group A (morning: 122.1 ±0.6 (SEM)/75.9 ±0.4 mmHg, evening: 120.4 ±0.6/71.8 ±0.4 mmHg) and lowest in group D (morning: 119.5 ±0.6 / 75.2 ±0.4 mmHg, evening: 117.5 ±0.6/70.6 ±0.4 mmHg). Using morning home BP, HT was diagnosed more often in group A (27.4%) than in group D (24.7%), with a lower frequency of NT diagnosis (55.7% vs. 61.7%; p?=?0.06). With regard to the diagnosis made from evening home BP, HT was diagnosed more often and NT was diagnosed less often in group A (HT/NT: 18.4%/61.4%) than in group D (13.7%/68.0%), with statistical significance (p?=?0.02). In conclusion, when the clinical diagnosis was made from seven-day home BP, the diagnosis of HT was made more frequently and NT diagnosis was made less frequently using the first measurement than the mean of the second and third measurements. This trend was more pronounced when diagnosis was made from evening home BP.     

Determinants of exaggerated difference in morning and evening blood pressure measured by self-measured blood pressure monitoring in medicated hypertensive patients: Jichi Morning Hypertension Research (J-MORE) Study

BACKGROUND: Morning blood pressure (BP) surge in ambulatory BP monitoring was a risk factor for stroke in our previous study. We studied the determinants of the morning minus evening systolic BP difference (ME difference) in self-measured BP monitoring, as a possible risk factor for stroke in medicated hypertensive patients. METHODS: Nine hundred sixty-nine hypertensive outpatients receiving stable antihypertensive drug treatment were studied using self-measured BP monitoring in the morning and evening. RESULTS: The ME difference ranged from -37.3 to 53.3 mm Hg (mean 7.9 mm Hg). The highest quartile (Q4) of the ME difference group (>15.0 mm Hg) had older age (68.0+/-9.8 years v 66.2+/-10.3 years, P=.01) and higher prevalence of men (48.3% v 39.9%, P=.02), regular alcohol drinkers (34.7% v 26.0%, P=.01) and beta-blocker use (26.9% v 19.9%, P=.03) than the other quartile groups (Q1 to Q3), whereas there was no significant difference in the average of morning and evening (ME average) BP. In logistic regression analysis controlling for ME average and other confounding factors, independent risks for Q4 of ME difference were older age (10 years older: odds ratio [OR] 1.21, P=.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04-1.42), regular alcohol drinker (OR 1.51, P=.04, 95% CI 1.01-2.26), and beta-blocker use (OR 1.50, P=.02, 95% CI 1.06-2.12). CONCLUSIONS: Older age, beta-blocker use, and regular alcohol drinking were significant determinants of the exaggerated ME difference in medicated hypertensive patients.     

Morning hypertension: the strongest independent risk factor for stroke in elderly hypertensive patients.

Stroke occurs most frequently in the morning hours, but the impact of the morning blood pressure (BP) level on stroke risk has not been fully investigated in hypertensives. We studied stroke prognosis in 519 older hypertensives in whom ambulatory BP monitoring was performed, and who were followed prospectively. During an average duration of 41 months (range: 1-68 months), 44 stroke events occurred. The morning systolic BP (SBP) was the strongest independent predictor for stroke events among clinic, 24-h, awake, sleep, evening, and pre-awake BPs, with a 10 mmHg increase in morning SBP corresponding to a relative risk (RR) of 1.44 (p<0.0001). The average of the morning and evening SBP (Av-ME-SBP; 10 mmHg increase: RR=1.41, p=0.0001), and the difference between the morning and evening SBP (Di-ME-SBP; 10 mmHg increase: RR=1.24, p=0.0025) were associated with stroke risks independently of each other. The RR of morning hypertension (Av-ME-SBP > or = 135 mmHg and Di-ME-SBP > or = 20 mmHg) vs. sustained hypertension (Av-ME-SBP > = 135 mmHg and Di-ME-SBP < or = 20 mmHg) for stoke events was 3.1 after controlling for other risk factors (p=0.01). In conclusion, morning hypertension is the strongest independent predictor for future clinical stroke events in elderly hypertensive patients, and morning and evening BPs should be monitored in the home as a first step in the treatment of hypertensive patients.     

Is masked hypertension an artefact due to the blood pressure measurement method and threshold effects?

From results of office and home measurements of blood pressure (BP), patients can be classified as "hypertensive (HT)", "normotensive (NT)", "office hypertensive (OH)" or "masked hypertensive (MH)" by crossing the classifications obtained from each method. It seems that 9 to 20% of patients could be MH with a prognosis close to HT (SHEAF study). OBJECTIVES: To test the hypothesis that at least one part of the prevalence of MH would be an artefact due to the difference between the methods of measurements (shygmomanometer vs semi-automatic device) and/or due to different definitions of office hypertension (OHT). To determine the impact of different definitions of OHT on the prevalence of MH. METHODS: During the course of a phase IV study, BP was measured with the same semi-automatic device (OMRON 705CP) both at doctor's office (3 measurements at 1-minute intervals) and at home, by the patient himself (3 measurements in the morning and in the evening at 1-minute intervals over the 7 days before the visit). Following definitions were used: Office HT: SBP > or =140 mmHg, DBP > or =90 mmHg, SBP > or =140 mmHg or DBP > or =90 mmHg; Home HT: SBP > or =135 mmHg, DBP> or =85 mmHg, SBP > or =135 mmHg or DBP > or =85 mmHg. Another definition of office HT was used SBP > or =135 mmHg, DBP > or =85 mmHg SBP > or =135 mmHg or DBP > or =85 mmHg. RESULTS: 575 patients were analysed. Results from the two methods of measurements are closed but significantly different (difference for SBP: 3.2 +/- 16.5 mmHg; p < 0.0001; difference for DBP: 1.4 +/- 10.3 mmHg; p = 0.002)     

Reproducibility of masked hypertension determined from morning and evening home blood pressure measurements over a 6-month period.

Recently, the existence of so-called masked hypertension has attracted attention. In this study, the reproducibility of masked hypertension determined from morning and evening home blood pressure measurements was examined over a 6-month period. Home blood pressure measurements were taken consecutively for 7 days in volunteers at a company in 2002 and again in 2003. The 503 Japanese subjects (329 male, 174 female, mean age: 39.4 years), who were not taking antihypertensive drugs, were asked to measure their home blood pressure three times every morning and three times every evening. We defined casual blood pressure > or =140 (systolic) or > or =90 (diastolic) mmHg and home blood pressure > or =135 or > or =85 mmHg as hypertension. We also defined normotension as <140 and <90 mmHg in casual blood pressure and <135 and <85 mmHg in home blood pressure. We examined the reproducibility of four blood pressure categories (normotension, hypertension, white-coat hypertension, and masked hypertension) over a 6-month period. When measured in morning home blood pressure, the reproducibility of masked hypertension (59.1%) was significantly higher than that of white-coat hypertension (25.0%) and similar to that of hypertension (67.6%). However, the reproducibility of masked hypertension (23.5%) was similar to that of white-coat hypertension (32.0%) and significantly lower than that of hypertension (66.7%) when determined using evening home blood pressure. The concordances in the four blood pressure categories between the two periods were 0.582 (kappa coefficient) and 0.463 when determined using morning and evening home blood pressure data, respectively. In conclusion, the reproducibility of masked hypertension over a 6-month period was moderate in an urban Japanese population when evaluated by morning home blood pressure.     

Prevalence of Masked Hypertension in Subjects Treated with Antihypertensive Drugs as Assessed by Morning versus Evening Home Blood Pressure Measurements: the J-HOME study

To investigate the relationship between morning and evening home blood pressure (BP) measurements to make a diagnosis of masked hypertension, we collected information on the characteristics of 3,303 essential hypertensive outpatients receiving antihypertensive medication in Japan using a physician, self-administered questionnaire. All patients were asked to measure their home BP once every morning and once every evening for two weeks. Morning and evening home BP values of each patient were defined as the average of all morning and all evening home BP values, respectively. The mean BP values of all study subjects were 142.8/80.6 mmHg for office BP, 139.8/81.8 mmHg for morning home BP, 133.7/76.9 mmHg for evening home BP, and 136.8/79.3 mmHg for the average of the morning and evening home BPs. Masked hypertension was defined as an office BP < 140/90 mmHg and a home BP > or = 135/85 mmHg. The prevalence of masked hypertension diagnosed using morning home BP (23.1%) was higher than that diagnosed by evening home BP (14.7%); the prevalence was 19.0% when diagnosed using the average of the morning and evening home BPs. Among the 1,386 patients with a normal office BP, the diagnosis of masked hypertension based on morning and evening home BP values differed in 28.8% of patients for systolic BP and 20.9% for diastolic BP (kappa coefficient = 0.43). The present study showed that the prevalence of masked hypertension was underestimated when the diagnosis of masked hypertension was made on the basis of evening home BP.     

Significance of white-coat hypertension in older persons with isolated systolic hypertension: a meta-analysis using the International Database on Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring in Relation to Cardiovascular Outcomes population

The significance of white-coat hypertension in older persons with isolated systolic hypertension remains poorly understood. We analyzed subjects from the population-based 11-country International Database on Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring in Relation to Cardiovascular Outcomes database who had daytime ambulatory blood pressure (BP; ABP) and conventional BP (CBP) measurements. After excluding persons with diastolic hypertension by CBP (≥90 mm Hg) or by daytime ABP (≥85 mm Hg), a history of cardiovascular disease, and persons <18 years of age, the present analysis totaled 7295 persons, of whom 1593 had isolated systolic hypertension. During a median follow-up of 10.6 years, there was a total of 655 fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events. The analyses were stratified by treatment status. In untreated subjects, those with white-coat hypertension (CBP ≥140/<90 mm Hg and ABP <135/<85 mm Hg) and subjects with normal BP (CBP <140/<90 mm Hg and ABP <135/<85 mm Hg) were at similar risk (adjusted hazard rate: 1.17 [95% CI: 0.87-1.57]; P=0.29). Furthermore, in treated subjects with isolated systolic hypertension, the cardiovascular risk was similar in elevated conventional and normal daytime systolic BP as compared with those with normal conventional and normal daytime BPs (adjusted hazard rate: 1.10 [95% CI: 0.79-1.53]; P=0.57). However, both treated isolated systolic hypertension subjects with white-coat hypertension (adjusted hazard rate: 2.00; [95% CI: 1.43-2.79]; P<0.0001) and treated subjects with normal BP (adjusted hazard rate: 1.98 [95% CI: 1.49-2.62]; P<0.0001) were at higher risk as compared with untreated normotensive subjects. In conclusion, subjects with sustained hypertension who have their ABP normalized on antihypertensive therapy but with residual white-coat effect by CBP measurement have an entity that we have termed, "treated normalized hypertension." Therefore, one should be cautious in applying the term "white-coat hypertension" to persons receiving antihypertensive treatment.     

Morning hypertension assessed by home monitoring is a strong predictor of concentric left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with untreated hypertension

This study was performed to test whether morning hypertension defined by the morning-evening difference in home blood pressure (BP) (MEdif) and the average of morning and evening BP (MEave) is a determinant of concentric left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). The authors enrolled patients with untreated hypertension and performed echocardiography and home BP monitoring for 14 consecutive days. All patients were classified into 4 groups by the MEave and MEdif and morning hypertension was defined by MEave ≥135 mm Hg and MEdif ≥15 mm Hg. Left ventricular (LV) geometry was classified as normal, concentric remodeling, eccentric LVH, or concentric LVH. The morning hypertensive patients had a higher LV mass index and relative wall thickness than the other groups. According to multivariable logistic regression analysis, morning hypertensive patients had a significantly increased risk of the concentric LVH (odds ratio, 6.5; 95% confidence interval, 2.5-17.2; P<.001) compared with home normotensive patients with MEdif <15 mm Hg, after adjusting for confounders. Moreover, even among the home normotensives (white-coat hypertensives), patients with MEdif ≥15 mm Hg had a higher percentage of concentric remodeling than those with MEdif <15 mm Hg (32.5% vs 14.7%, P=.017). Morning hypertension defined by the MEdif and MEave is a strong determinant of concentric LVH, suggesting that this definition could be used to determine the cardiovascular risk of morning hypertension.     

Prognostic value of the variability in home-measured blood pressure and heart rate: the Finn-Home Study

The objective of the study was to assess the prognostic value of variability in home-measured blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) in a general population. We studied a representative sample of the Finnish adult population with 1866 study subjects aged 45-74 years. BP and HR self-measurements were performed on 7 consecutive days. The variabilities of BP and HR were defined as the SDs of morning minus evening, day-by-day, and first minus second measurements. The primary end point was incidence of a cardiovascular event. The secondary end point was total mortality. During a follow-up of 7.8 years, 179 subjects had experienced a cardiovascular event, and 130 subjects had died. In Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for age, sex, BP/HR, and other cardiovascular risk factors, morning-evening home BP variability (systolic/diastolic relative hazard: 1.04/1.10 [95% CI: 1.01-1.07/1.05-1.15] per 1-mm Hg increase in BP variability) and morning day-by-day home BP variability (relative hazard: 1.04/1.10 [95% CI: 1.00-1.07/1.04-1.16] per 1-mm Hg increase in BP variability) were predictive of cardiovascular events. Morning-evening home HR variability (relative hazard: 1.07 [95% CI: 1.02-1.12] per 1-bpm increase in HR variability) and morning day-by-day home HR variability (relative hazard: 1.11 [95% CI: 1.05-1.17] per 1-bpm increase in HR variability) were also independent predictors of cardiovascular events. Greater variabilities of morning home BP and HR are independent predictors of cardiovascular events. Because the variabilities of home BP and HR are easily acquired in conjunction with home BP and HR level, they should be used as the additive information in the assessment of cardiovascular risk.     

Control of home heart rate and home blood pressure levels in treated patients with hypertension: the J-HOME study

OBJECTIVE: Recently, it was found that resting heart rate (HR) measured at home (home HR), as well as self-measured blood pressure (BP) at home (home BP), was a strong predictor of the risk of cardiovascular disease mortality in the general Japanese population. It was also reported that home BP levels were not adequately controlled in hypertensive patients. Little information, however, is available on the current status of home HR control in treated patients with hypertension. The objective of this study was to examine the current status of home HR control and home BP control among treated patients with hypertension. METHODS: Home HR and BP were measured using a self-monitored BP measuring device. Morning home HR and BP were obtained in 3183 patients and evening home HR and BP were obtained in 3106 patients. On the basis of an earlier study, we defined a home HR value of >or=70 beats/min as 'high home HR'. RESULTS: The mean home HR value was 67.2+/-9.1 beats/min in the morning and 69.6+/-9.2 beats/min in the evening. Of the 3183 patients, 35.7% had a high home HR in the morning and 46.7% of the 3106 patients had a high home HR in the evening. The prevalence of patients with a high home HR and a controlled home BP (<135/85 mmHg) was 11.3% in the morning and 24.2% in the evening. CONCLUSION: Resting home HR control and home BP control were inadequate.     

Pulse hypertension: a new component of the metabolic syndrome in elderly women?

The classification of arterial hypertension (HT) to define metabolic syndrome (MS) is unclear in that different cutoffs of blood pressure (BP) have been proposed. We evaluated the categorization of HT most qualified to define MS in relationship with coronary heart disease (CHD) mortality at a population level. A total of 3257 subjects aged > or =65 years were followed up for 12 years. MS was defined according to the criteria of the National Education Cholesterol Program using three different categories of HT: MS-1 (systolic blood pressure (SBP) > or =130 and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) > or =85 mm Hg), MS-2 (SBP > or =130 or DBP > or =85 mm Hg) and MS-3 (pulse pressure (PP) > or =75 mm Hg in men and > or =80 mm Hg in women). Gender-specific adjusted hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for CHD mortality was derived from Cox analysis in the three MS groups, both including and excluding antihypertensive treatment. In women with MS untreated for HT, the risk of CHD mortality was always significantly higher than in those without MS, independent of categorization; the HR of MS was 1.73 (CI 1.12-2.67) using MS-1, 1.75 (CI 1.10-2.83) using MS-2 and 2.39 (CI 3.71-1.31) using MS-3. In women with MS treated for HT, the HR of CHD mortality was significantly increased only in the MS-3 group (1.92, CI 1.1-2.88). MS did not predict CHD in men. In conclusion, MS can predict CHD mortality in elderly women with untreated HT but not in those with treated HT; in the latter, PP is the most predictive BP value.     

Anthropometric and lifestyle factors associated with white-coat, masked and sustained hypertension in a Chinese population

OBJECTIVE: We investigated to what extent anthropometric and lifestyle factors contributed to the classification of Chinese individuals into groups with white-coat, masked and sustained hypertension (HT). METHODS: We measured the office and ambulatory blood pressure (BP) in 694 Chinese enrolled in the JingNing population study (45.7% men; mean age, 48.4 years). In multivariate-adjusted analyses, we determined the correlates of both types of BP and the factors contributing to white-coat HT (conventional and daytime BP > or =140/90 and <135/85 mmHg, respectively), masked HT (<140/90 and > or =135/85 mmHg) and sustained HT (> or =140/90 and > or =135/85 mmHg), relative to normotension (<140/90 and <135/85 mmHg). RESULTS: In continuous analyses, the conventional and daytime BPs were positively associated with age, body mass index and urinary sodium, and inversely with urinary potassium. The prevalence of white-coat, masked and sustained HT was 7.8, 10.8, and 35.0%, respectively. In line with the continuous analyses, the risk of sustained hypertension increased with age [odds ratio (OR), 2.11 per 10 years], body mass index (OR, 1.27 per 1 kg/m2) and urinary sodium (OR, 1.18 per 50 mmol/day), but was inversely associated with urinary potassium (OR, 0.34 per 25 mmol/day). Furthermore, the risk of white-coat and masked HT increased with age (OR, 1.79 and 1.40, respectively) and body mass index (OR, 1.14 and 1.12). Women were less likely to have masked hypertension than men (OR, 0.39). CONCLUSIONS: Sex, age, body mass index, and urinary sodium and potassium excretion contribute to the risk of white-coat, masked and sustained HT in Chinese.     

Prognostic relevance of masked hypertension in subjects with prehypertension

BackgroundThe prognostic impact of masked hypertension is not yet completely clear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic relevance of masked hypertension in subjects with prehypertension.MethodsThe occurrence of fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events was evaluated in 591 subjects with prehypertension defined as clinic blood pressure (BP) in the range of 120-139 mm Hg for systolic BP and 80-89 mm Hg for diastolic BP. Among them, 471 were classified as having true prehypertension (clinic BP <140/90 mm Hg and daytime BP <135/85 mm Hg) and 120 as having masked hypertension (clinic BP <140/90 mm Hg and daytime BP >/=135 or 85 mm Hg).ResultsDuring the follow-up (6.6 +/- 4.3 years, range 0.5-15.5 years), 29 cardiovascular events occurred. In subjects with true prehypertension and masked hypertension the event-rates per 100 patient-years were 0.57 and 1.51, respectively. Event-free survival was significantly different between the groups (P < 0.005). After adjustment for other covariates, including clinic BP (forced into the model), Cox regression analysis showed that cardiovascular risk was significantly higher in masked hypertension than in true prehypertension (masked vs. true prehypertension, relative risk 2.65, 95% confidence interval 1.18-5.98, P = 0.018).ConclusionsAmong subjects with prehypertension, those with masked hypertension are at higher cardiovascular risk than those with true prehypertension. Out-of-office BP should be known in individuals with prehypertension, preferably by ambulatory BP monitoring or alternatively by home BP measurement, to obtain a better prognostic stratification.American Journal of Hypertension (2008). doi:10.1038/ajh.2008.196American Journal of Hypertension (2008); 21, 8, 879-883. doi:10.1038/ajh.2008.196.     

Stroke risk in systolic and combined systolic and diastolic hypertension determined using ambulatory blood pressure. The Ohasama study

BACKGROUND: To investigate the risk of stroke in subjects with isolated systolic hypertension (ISH), isolated diastolic hypertension (IDH), and combined systolic and diastolic hypertension (SDH) in a Japanese general population, we used 24-h ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) and casual-screening blood-pressure (CBP) readings. METHODS: Subtypes of hypertension were defined based on systolic blood pressure (SBP) >135 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) >80 mm Hg for 24-h ABP, and SBP >140 mm Hg or DBP >90 mm Hg for CBP. We obtained 24-h ABP and CBP data for 1271 (40% male) subjects aged > or =40 years (mean age, 61 years) without a history of symptomatic stroke; their stroke-free survival was then determined. The prognostic significance of each subtype of hypertension was determined by Cox proportional hazard analysis. RESULTS: There were 113 symptomatic strokes during follow-up (mean time, 11 years). Compared with normotension, among the hypertension subtypes determined by 24-h ABP, the adjusted relative hazards (RHs) of stroke were 2.24 for ISH (P = .002) and 2.39 for SDH (P = .0004). The association was less marked among subtypes determined by CBP (RH = 1.40 and P = .13 for ISH; RH = 2.07 and P = .017 for SDH). The IDH group was excluded from the Cox analysis because both the prevalence and the number of events were low in this group. CONCLUSIONS: Isolated systolic hypertension, as determined by 24-h ABP measurements, was associated with a high risk of stroke, similar to that found in SDH subjects; this suggests that the prognosis of hypertensive patients would be improved by focusing treatment on 24-h systolic ABP.