Biliary Internal Stents and Biliary Complications in Adult Liver Transplantation

BackgroundBiliary complications in liver transplantation (LT) can cause significant morbidity or even lead to a potential graft loss and patient mortality. Oftentimes biliary internal stents (ISs) are used at the time of LT to lower the risk for or prevent these biliary complications; however, their efficacy and outcomes remain controversial.MethodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted on all of the adult patients who underwent a deceased-donor LT (DDLT) with an end-to-end choledococholedocostomy. An IS was placed across the biliary anastomosis, passing through the ampulla. We compared the demographic profiles and various outcomes between the 2 groups (no-IS group vs IS group) and examined risk factors associated with anastomotic biliary complications.ResultsThe study comprised 350 patients in the no-IS group and 132 patients in the IS group. Anastomotic biliary fistula (ABF) occurred in 5 (1.4%) and 1 (0.8%) patients in the no-IS group and the IS group, respectively (P = .55). Anastomotic biliary stricture (ABS) occurred in 53 (15.1%) and 18 (13.6%) patients, respectively (P = .68). No significant difference was found in the overall biliary complications between the 2 groups (P = .33). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, acute rejection was the only risk factor for ABS (P = .02). One biliary complication–induced mortality occurred in the no-IS group in which the patient died of an ABF-induced hepatic artery pseudoaneurysm rupture.ConclusionThe use of biliary ISs in DDLT did not reduce the overall risk for biliary complications, but more research is needed to draw definite conclusions.     

External Biliary Drainage in Living Donor Liver Transplantation Using Duct-to-Duct Anastomosis

Purpose

This study compared the incidence of biliary complication (BC) in adult living donor liver transplant recipients who underwent right-lobe duct-to-duct anastomosis (DDA) with or without external biliary drainage (EBD) and intended to optimize EBD tube clamping.

Methods

This study consisted of a retrospective assessment of EBD effect and a prospective trial for EBD tube-clamping optimization. The retrospective study included the EBD group (n = 208) and the non-EBD group (n = 145). The prospective study included 60 patients with EBD.

Results

In the retrospective study, single DDA was performed in 83.7% of the EBD group and 80.7% of the non-EBD group (P = .47). One-year overall incidence of BC was 14.4% in the EBD group and 16.8% in the non-EBD group (P = .48). The incidence of early anastomotic bile leakage was 1.0% in the EBD group and 4.8% in the non-EBD group (P = .036). In the prospective study, there was no difference in tube-clamping success rates between low- and high-output EBD groups. There was also no statistical difference between the success and failure groups in terms of graft duct size, liver function tests, and post-transplant days at tube clamping.

Conclusions

The size of our EBD tube was too small for the graft duct size, therefore its main role appeared to be early biliary decompression, which helped prevent bile leakage and also simplified the route of cholangiogram in detecting early BC. Hence, EBD is worthy of performing in selected patients with a high risk of anastomotic bile leak.     

Long-Term Outcome of Adult-to-Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation for Post-Kasai Biliary Atresia

Our objective was to analyze problems in the perioperative management and long-term outcome of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for biliary atresia (BA). Many reports have described the effectiveness of liver transplantation (LT) for BA, particularly in pediatric cases, but little information is available regarding LT in adults (> or =16 years old). Between June 1990 and December 2004, 464 patients with BA underwent LDLT at Kyoto University Hospital, of whom 47 (10.1%) were older than 16 years. In this study, we compared the outcomes between adult (> or =16 years old) and pediatric (<16 years old) patients. The incidence of post-transplant intestinal perforation, intra-abdominal bleeding necessitating repeat laparotomy and biliary leakage was significantly higher (p < 0.0001, <0.001 and <0.001, respectively) in adults. Overall cumulative 1-, 5- and 10-year survival rates in pediatric patients were significantly higher (p < 0.005) than in adults. Two independent prognostic determinants of survival were identified: a MELD score over 20 and post-transplant complications requiring repeat laparotomy. Outcome of LDLT in adult BA patients was poorer than in pediatric patients. It seems likely that LT will be the radical treatment of choice for BA and that LDLT should be considered proactively at the earliest possible stage.     

Reduction of Biliary Complication Rate Using Continuous Suture and No Biliary Drainage for Duct-to-Duct Anastomosis in Whole-Organ Liver Transplantation

Biliary complications (BC) following orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) are related to various factors including surgical technique and use of biliary drains for a duct-to-duct (DD) anastomosis. Herein we have reported the influence of changes in surgical technique on BC following OLT in our center. From February 2002 to February 2007, we performed 101 whole-organ OLT with a DD anastomosis in 99 adults, of whom we analyzed 84 subjects. We excluded recipients who died within 30 days of OLT without any evidence of BC and 1 patient with a biliary stricture secondary to a hepatic artery thrombosis. Until late 2004, a DD anastomosis with interrupted sutures over an external biliary drain (DD/BD) was performed in 35 patients (Group I). Subsequently, no biliary drain was used for the DD anastomosis (DD/non-BD), using a continuous suture in 49 patients (Group II). The DD anastomosis with interrupted sutures over a biliary drain was associated with a higher incidence of both total (31% vs 8%; P = .008) and late BC (>30 days; 20% vs 2%; P = .008) with a trend toward more leaks (17% vs 4%; P = .06). All biliary leaks in patients with DD/BD reconstruction occurred at the exit site of the biliary drain following its removal. No significant differences were observed when we compared the incidence of biliary strictures and the necessity for surgical intervention. One patient died due to a BC. Our results indicated that a DD anastomosis performed with a continuous suture technique and no external biliary drainage reduced the incidence of BC after whole-organ OLT.     

Biliary Anastomosis in Living Related Liver Transplantation Using the Right Liver Lobe: Techniques and Complications

Since the introduction of adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation using the right lobe of the liver, biliary problems have led the list of complications resulting in postoperative morbidity. We report our experience with the first 30 living donor liver transplantations performed in our institution from August 1998 to January 2000. Patients were 21 men and 9 women, with a mean age 45 ± 16 years. Mean recipient weight was 65.1 ± 17.9 kg, mean graft weight was 877 ± 146 g, and the mean graft-recipient weight ratio was 1.5 ± 0.6. Patient and graft survival rates were 83.3% and 80%, respectively. Biliary anastomosis was either an end-to-end hepaticocholedochostomy with a T-drain or hepaticojejunostomy. Mean follow-up was 217.4 ± 149.8 days. The overall complication rate was 26.6% (8 of 30 procedures) and was directly correlated to the type of anastomosis and number of bile ducts. Surgical revision was necessary in all cases. Biliary complications were not the primary cause of graft loss. Adult living donor liver transplantation using the right lobe is a successful procedure, with graft and patient survival similar to those in cadaver full-organ transplantation. Postoperative morbidity, mainly caused by biliary leak, was directly related to the number of ducts and type of anastomosis. With increasing experience, we have better defined our plane of transection on the hilar plate, with the goal of obtaining only 1 biliary duct for the anastomosis. We also improved our parenchymal transection technique, which resulted in a decreased incidence of leak at the cut-surface area. (Liver Transpl 2000;6:710-714.)     

Usefulness of External Biliary Stent Buried Suture for Reducing Stent-Related Complications In Liver Transplantation

BackgroundExternal bile stents may be used to prevent biliary complications. However, the external biliary stent itself has a risk of complications. This study evaluated the frequency and treatment of complications associated with external bile stent.MethodsFrom May 2015 to September 2019, 18 deceased donor liver transplantations (DDLTs) and 25 living donor liver transplantations (LDLTs) were performed. We retrospectively reviewed these patients’ demographic profiles, type of transplantation and presence of biliary complications, external bile stent–related complications, and treatment results.ResultsOverall biliary complications occurred in 12 patients (27.9%): 3 strictures (6.9%), 2 leakages (4.6%), and 7 external bile stent–related complications (16.2%). Among the 7, 4 were self-removal or stent fractures at home, and 2 occurred after removal by a physician. One patient had ileus with peritonitis. Local peritonitis was controlled by antibiotics and fluid therapy, but 1 patient needed an operation because of intestinal obstruction with recurrent local peritonitis. All biliary complications occurred in LDLT, and external biliary stent–related complications also occurred only in LDLT, not in DDLT (P = .014). Interestingly, only 1 of 7 external bile stent–related complications occurred after we adopted the stent buried suture technique on the duodenum (P = .062).ConclusionsExternal bile stent–related complications were higher in LDLT than in DDLT. When performing external bile stent implantation, the stent buried suture technique will help reduce stent-related complications, especially in LDLT.     

Archimedes Absorbable Internal Biliary Stent in Liver Transplants to Prevent Bile Leak

BackgroundBiliary complications, especially bile leaks, are an important cause of early postoperative morbidity and, rarely, mortality after liver transplant. The risk is higher in living donor liver transplant (LDLT) compared to deceased donor liver transplant (DDLT). Attempts to reduce bile leaks have included refinements in the biliary anastomosis technique and use of various external and internal stents, with inconsistent benefits. Recent availability and successful use of the absorbable Archimedes stent has prompted its intrabiliary placement across the anastomosis.MethodsIn this retrospective study, we analyzed the data of 20 adult patients who underwent a liver transplant with duct-to-duct biliary anastomosis using the Archimedes stent. Both DDLT and LDLT were performed using cava-preserving hepatectomy followed by standard implantation methods. Duct-to-duct biliary anastomosis was performed in all cases using interrupted sutures with extracorporeal knots over an absorbable intrabiliary stent. In addition to standard postoperative care, patients were monitored for bile leak.ResultsNine DDLTs had a single anastomosis over a 10-Fr stent. Out of 11 LDLT patients, 7 had a single anastomosis and 4 patients had 2 anastomoses, all over a 6-Fr stent. Two patients died, 1 as a result of graft primary nonfunction and another because of multidrug-resistant pneumonia. One patient had ascending cholangitis owing to stent migration in the duodenum. This episode was treated with endoscopic stent removal and appropriate antibiotics, with good recovery. None of the other patients had bile leaks, biloma, or stent-related complications.ConclusionsArchimedes internal absorbable biliary stents can be safely used in both living and deceased donor liver transplants to prevent bile leaks.     

Roux-en-Y Choledochojejunostomy Versus Duct-to-Duct Biliary Anastomosis in Liver Transplantation for Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis: A Meta-Analysis

Background

Roux-en-Y choledochojejunostomy and duct-to-duct anastomosis are potential methods for biliary reconstruction in liver transplantation (LT) for recipients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). However, there is controversy over which method yields superior outcomes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of duct-to-duct versus Roux-en-Y biliary anastomosis in patients undergoing LT for PSC.

Methods

Studies comparing Roux-en-Y versus duct-to-duct anastomosis during LT for PSC were identified based on systematic searches of 9 electronic databases and multiple sources of gray literature.

Results

The search identified 496 citations, including 7 retrospective series, and 692 patients met eligibility criteria. The use of duct-to-duct anastomosis was not associated with a significant difference in clinical outcomes, including 1-year recipient survival rates (odds ratio [OR], 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65–1.60; P = .95), 1-year graft survival rates (OR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.72–1.71; P = .64), risk of biliary leaks (OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.59–2.59; P = .33), risk of biliary strictures (OR, 1.99; 95% CI, 0.98–4.06; P = .06), or rate of recurrence of PSC (OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.19–4.78; P = .94).

Conclusions

There were no significant differences in 1-year recipient survival, 1-year graft survival, risk of biliary complications, and PSC recurrence between Roux-en-Y and duct-to-duct biliary anastomosis in LT for PSC.     

Variation in Biliary Complication Rates Following Liver Transplantation: Implications for Cost and Outcome

Although biliary complications (BCs) have a significant impact on the outcome of liver transplantation (LT), variation in BC rates among transplant centers has not been previously analyzed. BC rate, LT outcome and spending were assessed using linked Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients and Medicare claims (n = 16 286 LTs). Transplant centers were assigned to BC quartiles based upon risk‐adjusted observed to expected (O:E) ratio of BC separately for donation after brain death (DBD) and donation after cardiac death (DCD) donors. The median incidence of BC was 300% greater in the highest versus lowest DBD quartiles (19.0% vs. 5.9%) and varied 250% between DCD quartiles (20.3%–8.4%). Donor and recipient characteristics suggest that high BC centers actually used lower donor risk index organs, fewer split livers and fewer imports (p < 0.001 for all). Transplant at a center in the highest O:E quartile was associated with increased posttransplant mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 2.53, p = 0.007) in DCD transplant and increased graft loss (aHR 1.21, p = 0.02) in DBD transplant. Medicare spending was $22 895 (p < 0.0001) higher at centers in highest versus lowest BC quartile. In summary, BC rates vary widely among transplant centers and higher rates are a marker for an increased risk of death, graft failure and health‐care spending.     

A Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Biliary Anastomosis With or Without T-tube after Orthotopic Liver Transplantation

Biliary reconstruction continues to be a major source of morbidity following orthotopic liver transplantation. We wished to determine if choledochocholedochostomy without a T-tube was associated with fewer biliary complications and was less costly than choledochocholedochostomy with a T-tube. A retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent liver transplantation was performed. Patients were stratified into two groups: group I had bile duct reconstruction with T-tube and group II did not have a T-tube. The results were interpreted on an intention-to-treat analysis. We identified 147 adult patients who underwent initial liver transplantation. There were 76 patients in group I and 71 patients in group II. There were no statistical differences between the two groups regarding underlying cause of liver disease, patient age, gender or United Network for Organ Sharing status. As the decision to use a T-tube was made at the time of surgery, the two groups may not be strictly comparable. The mean hospital stay was longer in group I (31.1 +/- 27.9d) than in group II (18.8 +/- 15.5d) (p = 0.001). Biliary complications were statistically more frequent in patients from group I patients (25/76, 32.9%) than in patients from group II (11/71, 15.5%) (p = 0.01). There was a trend for the costs associated with diagnostic and therapeutic procedures for the management of biliary complications to be greater for group I than for group II, although this was not statistically significant (p = 0.235). Our study suggests choledochocholedochostomy without T-tube reconstruction is the preferred strategy for biliary reconstruction in orthotopic liver transplantation. It is not only associated with fewer biliary complications, but also less costly than using choledochocholedochostomy over a T-tube. Randomized prospective studies are needed to confirm our results.     

Intrahepatic Bilioenteric Anastomosis After Biliary Complications of Liver Transplantation: Operative Rescue of Surgical Failures

Background  Biliary complications after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) are multifactorial in origin. In most series, the frequency of such complications ranges from 5–20%. Most can be treated by endoscopy and/or interventional radiology. For cases in which this option is not successful, surgical approach is indicated. We report the results of reoperation using an intrahepatic bilioenteric anastomosis. Methods  The medical charts of patients with biliary complications after OLT during a 10-year period (1997–2007), who failed to respond to nonsurgical treatment and were surgically treated, were reviewed. Roux-en-Y hepatojejunostomy was performed. Segments IV and V were partially removed after cutting the hilar plate, thus obtaining healthy ducts without ischemic or inflammatory reaction and allowing a wide hepatojejunostomy. Results  Five cases (8.4%) with biliary complications after duct-to-duct anastomosis not amenable to further endoscopic management or interventional radiology were identified. Hepaticojejunostomy was achieved in all cases (wide, tension-free, nonischemic, fine hydrolyzable sutures), and segments IV and V were partially removed. No cholangitis, jaundice, and liver function test abnormalities were present in the postoperative. Mean follow-up was 24 months. Only one patient died of causes not related to bile duct reconstruction during follow-up. Conclusions  Intrahepatic hepatojejunostomy with partial resection of segments IV and V offers an excellent therapeutic alternative for biliary complications that require a surgical approach after OLT.     

The Effect of Recipient-Specific Surgical Issues on Outcome of Liver Transplantation in Biliary Atresia

Biliary atresia (BA), the most common reason for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) in children, is often accompanied by unique and challenging anatomical variations. This study examines the effect of surgical-specific issues related to the presence of complex vascular anatomic variants on the outcome of OLT for BA. The study group comprised 944 patients who were enrolled in the Studies of Pediatric Liver Transplantation (SPLIT) registry and underwent OLT for BA over an 11-year period. 63 (6.7%) patients met the study definition of complex vascular anomalies (CVA). Patient survival, but not graft survival, was significantly lower in the CVA group, (83 vs. 93 % at 1-year post-OLT). The CVA group had a significantly higher incidence of all reoperations, total biliary tract complications, biliary leaks and bowel perforation. The most frequent cause of death was infection, and death from bacterial infection was more common in the CVA group. Pretransplant portal vein thrombosis and a preduodenal portal vein were significant predictors of patient survival but not graft survival. This study demonstrates that surgical and technical factors have an effect on the outcome of BA patients undergoing OLT. However, OLT in these complex patients is technically achievable with an acceptable patient and graft survival.     

Novel Application of Internal-External Drainage Catheter as Biliary Stent for Percutaneous Transhepatic Treatment of Biliary Strictures in Living Donor Liver Transplantation Recipient Patients

ObjectivesAlthough endoscopic management is considered as the first-line treatment for biliary strictures, it may be challenging in living donor liver transplant recipients due to the complex nature of duct-to-duct reconstruction. In this study we present the use of a pigtail drainage catheter as a biliary stent to treat biliary strictures after a living donor liver transplant.MethodsTwenty-seven patients with biliary strictures were treated with our novel technique. In this technique, a pigtail catheter was trimmed into 3 parts (proximal, middle, and distal portions). A suture string was passed through the distal hole of the middle portion, which was then reversed and used as a stent while the proximal portion was used as a pusher. Following balloon dilation of the stenotic segment, the distal, reversed middle, and proximal portions were loaded over the guidewire. After proper placement of the stent, the retractor suture string, pusher, and guidewire were removed. The stent was removed during the third or fourth month of placement through endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in all patients.ResultsNo significant complications developed during the procedure or follow-up period. Ten patients required re-stenting by ERCP during the same session. The mean follow-up period was 2 years. Cholestase enzymes and bilirubin levels were within normal limits in all patients during follow-up.ConclusionStents derived from drainage catheter facilitate treatment of biliary strictures in patients not eligible for the retrograde approach. This stent is cheap, easy to implement, can be easily removed by ERCP, and re-stenting can be applicable in retrograde if needed.     

Risk Factors for and Clinical Course of Non-Anastomotic Biliary Strictures After Liver Transplantation

Non-anastomotic biliary stricture (NAS) formation is a major complication of liver transplantation. We prospectively determined the time to development of responsiveness to treatment, and clinical outcomes following NAS formation. In addition, an extensive analysis of the association of recipient, donor, and clinical variables with NAS formation was performed. A total of 749 consecutive patients was studied in a prospective, protocol-based fashion. Seventy-two patients (9.6%) developed NAS at a mean of 23.6 +/- 34.2 weeks post-transplantation. Non-anastomotic biliary stricture formation resolved in only 6% of affected patients. Although patient survival was not affected, retransplantation and graft loss rates were significantly greater in recipients who developed NAS. In contrast to previous reports, a pretransplant diagnosis of HCV was associated with a low frequency of NAS formation. The incidence of NAS was independently associated with pretransplant diagnoses of PSC and autoimmune hepatitis. Hepatic artery thrombosis, and prolonged warm and cold ischemia times were also independent risk factors for NAS formation. We conclude that NAS developed in approximately 10% of primary liver transplant recipients. A pretransplant diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis has been identified as a novel independent risk factor for NAS formation. Development of NAS significantly attenuates graft but not patient survival.     

External Biliary Fistula in Orthotopic Liver Transplantation

During orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT), various situations may occur in which biliary reconstruction is neither technically feasible nor recommended. One bridge to a delayed anastomosis can be an external biliary fistula (EBF). This procedure allows the surgeon to execute hemostatic maneuvers, such as abdominal packing; therefore, biliary reconstruction can be subsequently performed in a bloodless operative field without edematous tissues. EBF can be made by placing in the donor biliary tract a cannula that is fixed to the bile duct using 2-0 silk ties and secured outside the abdominal wall. The biliary anastomosis will be performed within 2 days after the OLT. The aim of this study was to examine the safety of EBF in terms of the incidence of biliary complications compared with a direct anastomosis. Among 1634 adult OLTs performed in 17 years in our center, 1322 were carried out with termino-terminal hepaticocholedochostomy (HC-TT); two with side-to-side hepaticocholedochostomy; 208 with hepaticojejunostomy (HJ); 31 with EBF and delayed HC-TT, and 71 with EBF and delayed HJ. Biliary complication rates in the EBF group were 24.5%, including 23.9% in the delayed HJ and 25.8% in the delayed HC-TT. Biliary complication incidence among all OLTs was 24.6% (P = NS). No complications related to the procedure were observed. Therefore, EBF is a safe technique without a higher biliary complication rate. It may be useful when a direct biliary anastomosis is dangerous.     

Biliary Complications After Pediatric Liver Transplantation

ObjectivesAfter liver transplantation, biliary complications are more prevalent in pediatric patients, with reported rates varying between 15% and 30%.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed biliary complications observed in 84 pediatric liver transplantation patients between July 2006 and September 2012. Biliary reconstruction was accomplished via a duct-to-duct anastomosis in 5 (83.3%) of the 6 patients receiving whole liver grafts and in 44 (56.4%) of the 78 patients who received a segmental live donor graft. For the remaining 34 patients with living donor and 1 patient with whole liver graft, Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy was the preferred method.ResultsPost-transplantation biliary complications were encountered in 26 patients (30.1%). The biliary complication rate was 38% in 49 duct-to-duct anastomosis, whereas it was 20% in the hepaticojejunostomy group consisting of 35 recipients. Thirteen of the 18 biliary leaks were from duct-to-duct anastomoses and the remaining 5 were from the hepaticojejunostomies and 6 of the 8 biliary strictures were observed in recipients with duct-to-duct anastomosis. In 19 of the 26 patients, the biliary complications were successfully treated with interventional radiologic procedures and 1 was treated with stent placement during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.ConclusionsPercutaneous interventional procedures are valuable, effective, and life-saving therapeutic alternatives for the treatment of bile leaks and strictures after pediatric liver transplantations.     

Outcome After Liver Transplantation for NASH Cirrhosis

Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) associated cirrhosis is an increasing indication for liver transplant (LT). The aim of this study was to determine outcome and poor predictive factors after LT for NASH cirrhosis. We analyzed patients undergoing LT from 1997 to 2008 at a single center. NASH was diagnosed on histopathology. LT recipients with hepatitis C, alcoholic or cholestatic liver disease and cryptogenic cirrhosis acted as matched controls.
Ninety-eight LT recipients were identified with NASH cirrhosis. Compared to controls, NASH patients had a higher BMI (mean 32.3 kg/m²), and were more likely to be diabetic and hypertensive. Mortality after transplant was similar between NASH patients and controls but there was a tendency for higher earlier mortality in NASH patients (30-day mortality 6.1%, 1-year mortality 21.4%). Sepsis accounted for half of all deaths in NASH patients, significantly higher than controls. NASH patients ≥60 years, BMI ≥30 kg/m² with diabetes and hypertension (HTN) had a 50% 1-year mortality.
In conclusion, patients undergoing LT for NASH cirrhosis have a similar outcome to patients undergoing LT for other indications. The combination of older age, higher BMI, diabetes and HTN are associated with poor outcome after LT. Careful consideration is warranted before offering LT to these high-risk patients.     

Recurrent Primary Biliary Cirrhosis After Liver Transplantation

Recurrent primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) is an important clinical outcome after liver transplantation (LT) in selected patients. Prevalence rates for recurrent PBC (rPBC) reported by individual LT programs range between 9% and 35%. The diagnostic hallmark of rPBC is histologic identification of granulomatous changes. Clinical and biochemical features are frequently absent with rPBC and cannot be used alone for diagnostic purposes. Some of the risk factors of rPBC may include recipient factors such as age, gender, HLA status and immunosuppression, as well as donor factors such as age, gender and ischemic time, although controversy exists. Most patients have early stage disease at the time of diagnosis, and there may be a role for therapy with ursodeoxycholic acid. While short‐ and medium‐term outcomes remain favorable, especially if compared to patients transplanted for other indications, continued follow‐up may identify reduced long‐term graft and patient survival.