Sensory and pulmonary irritation with exposure to methyl isocyanate

Methyl isocyanate (MIC) was tested for its potency as a sensory irritant and as a pulmonary irritant in mice. To evaluate sensory irritation, animals were exposed to MIC at concentrations between 0.5 and 7.6 ppm for a period of 90 min. A characteristic reflex decrease in respiratory rate indicating sensory irritation was observed. The concentration evoking a 50% decrease in respiratory rate (RD50) was found to be 1.3 ppm. To evaluate pulmonary irritation, animals were first anesthetized and fitted with a tracheal cannula. Following recovery from anesthesia, they were exposed to MIC at concentrations between 0.4 and 7.3 ppm for a period of 90 min. A characteristic decrease in respiratory rate indicating pulmonary irritation in tracheally cannulated (TC) mice was observed. The concentration evoking a 50% decrease in respiratory rate (RD50TC) was found to be 1.9 ppm. Thus, MIC was found to be a potent sensory and pulmonary irritant.     

Final report on the safety assessment of Methyl Alcohol

Methyl Alcohol is an aliphatic alcohol with use in a few cosmetic formulations as a solvent and denaturant. Concentrations up to 5% are typically used to denature ethyl alcohol in cosmetic products. Methyl Alcohol is readily absorbed through the skin and from the gastrointestinal and respiratory tracts, is distributed throughout all organs and tissues (in direct relation to the body's water distribution), and is eliminated primarily via the lungs. Undiluted Methyl Alcohol is an ocular and skin irritant. Inhalation studies showed a no-effect level for maternal damage of 10,000 ppm and for teratogenic effects of 5,000 ppm. Overall, Methyl Alcohol is not considered mutagenic. Carcinogenicity data were unavailable. The toxicity of Methyl Alcohol in humans results from the metabolism of the alcohol to formate and formic acid through a formaldehyde intermediate. Formate accumulation causes metabolic acidosis and inhibits cellular respiration. Methyl Alcohol toxicity is time and concentration dependent, and its toxic effect is competitively inhibited with ethyl alcohol. Because of the moderating effect of ethyl alcohol, it was concluded that Methyl Alcohol is safe as used to denature ethyl alcohol used in cosmetic products. No conclusion was reached regarding any other use of Methyl Alcohol.     

Acute respiratory responses of the mouse to chlorine.

In human subjects 15-min exposure to 0.5-1.0 ppm chlorine gas causes a nasal obstructive response in the absence of a marked sensation of irritation. The current investigation was designed to assess the response of the mouse for comparative purposes. Respiratory physiological responses were measured in female C57Bl/6J mice exposed to 0.8 to 4.0 ppm chlorine gas. Chlorine was a potent sensory irritant with an RD50 of 2.3 ppm. The gas produced airway obstruction as indicated by a concentration-dependent increase in specific airways resistance (sRaw) during the 15-min exposure. At 0.8 ppm, chlorine produced only mild sensory irritation (<20% change in breathing frequency) and a 65% increase in sRaw. Pretreatment with atropine was without effect on the obstructive response, suggesting a lack of involvement of muscarinic cholinergic pathways. Pretreatment with the sensory nerve toxin, capsaicin, dramatically reduced both the sensory irritation and obstructive responses to chlorine, suggesting the involvement of sensory nerves. Studies were also performed using the surgically isolated upper respiratory tract of the anesthetized mouse. Chlorine was efficiently scrubbed from the airstream (>97%) in that site and produced an obstructive response that was of sufficient magnitude to account for the entire response observed in the intact animal. In summary, chlorine gas produces an immediate nasal obstructive response in the mouse that appears to be similar to that in the human.     

Sensory irritation: risk assessment approaches

Irritation of eyes and upper airways--sensory irritation--is commonly used as a parameter for setting occupational exposure limits and is a common complaint in occupants of non-industrial buildings. Sensory irritation occurs from stimulation of receptors on trigeminal nerves. In general, chemically reactive compounds are more potent than non-reactive congeners. Animal studies allow prediction of sensory irritation effects in humans; the concentration-effect relationships are often steep. In humans, thresholds and suprathreshold effects can be obtained from short-term ( approximately seconds) exposures and from longer exposures ( approximately hours). Sensory irritation may develop over time and odour cues may influence reported sensory irritation symptoms; generally, the slope of the irritant effect is steeper than the slope of odour cues. A best available no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) should be based on a combined estimate from the three types of study. The NOAEL/5 is considered sufficient to protect individuals not especially sensitive. The present knowledge suggests that especially sensitive individuals may be protected by an additional uncertainty factor (UF) of 2, suggesting a combined UF of 10. In published studies, the combined UF is up to 300, highlighting the need of evidence-based UFs. Combined effects of sensory irritants can be considered additive as a first approximation.     

Effects of methacrolein on the respiratory tract in mice

The acute respiratory effects of airborne exposure to methacrolein were studied in a recent refinement of the standard test method with mice (ASTM, 1984. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia). Irritation of the upper respiratory tract caused a concentration-dependent decrease in the respiratory rate of 2-26 ppm methacrolein. In this range, only a minor airflow limitation occurred in the lower respiratory tract, suggesting that the main effect of methacrolein is sensory irritation. During exposure, the sensory irritation response maintained the same level, i.e. no desensitisation occurred. The concentration 10.4 ppm methacrolein reduced the respiratory rate by 50% (RD50). The extrapolated threshold for the respiratory depressing effect, RD0, was 1.3 ppm. The sensory irritation effect of methacrolein was compared with results from closely related compounds in order to elucidate the mechanism of the interaction between methacrolein and the sensory irritant receptor.     

Adenosine sensory transduction pathways contribute to activation of the sensory irritation response to inspired irritant vapors.

The molecular mechanisms through which sensory irritants stimulate nasal trigeminal nerves are poorly understood. The current study was aimed at evaluating the potential contribution of purinergic sensory transduction pathways in this process. Aerosols of 4-36 mM adenosine 5'-triphosphate (ATP) and adenosine both acted as sensory irritants. Large dose capsaicin pretreatment to induce degeneration of transient receptor potential vanilloid type-1 (TRPV1)-expressing C fibers greatly reduced, but did not abolish, the sensory irritation response to ATP aerosol and was without effect on the response to adenosine aerosol, indicating that ATP acts largely on capsaicin-sensitive (primarily C fibers) and adenosine acts on capsaicin-insensitive (primarily Adelta fibers) nerves. The response to adenosine was diminished by pretreatment with the broad-based adenosine receptor antagonist theophylline (20 mg/kg) and A1-selective antagonist 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine (0.1 mg/kg), providing evidence that adenosine stimulates capsaicin-insensitive nerves via the A1 receptor. The sensory irritation responses to 275 ppm styrene and 110 ppm acetic acid vapors were significantly reduced by theophylline pretreatment suggesting a role for adenosine signaling pathways in activation of the sensory irritant response by these vapors. If sensory nerves are activated by mediators that are released from injured airway mucosal cells, then nasal sensory nerve activation may be a reflection of irritant-induced alterations in airway cell integrity.     

Methanol and Formic Acid Toxicity: Biochemical Mechanisms

Abstract: Metabolism of methanol, methyl ethers, esters and amides give rise to formic acid. This acid is an inhibitor of the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase causing histotoxic hypoxia. Formic acid is a weaker inhibitor than cyanide and hydrosulphide anions. The body burden of formate in methanol poisoning is high enough to cause acidosis, and other clinical symptoms. Part of the protons can be attributed to formic acid whereas the most significant acid load results from the hypoxic metabolism. The acidosis causes e.g. dilatation of cerebral vessels, facilitation of the entry of calcium ions into cells, loss of lysosomal latency and deranged production of ATP. The latter effect seems to impede parathormone-dependent calcium reabsorption in the kidney tubules. Besides, urinary acidification is affected by formic acid. Its excretion causes continuous recycling of the acid by the tubular cell Cl^?/formate exchanger. This sequence of events may partially explain an accumulation of formate in urine. Occupational exposure to vapours of methanol and formic acid can be quantitatively monitored by urinary formic acid determinations. Formic acid toxicity may prove a suitable model for agents causing histotoxic hypoxia.     

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Asthmatics often report the triggering or exacerbation of respiratory symptoms following exposure to airborne irritants, which in some cases may result from stimulation of irritant receptors in the upper airways inducing reflexive bronchoconstriction. Ammonia (NH₃) is a common constituent of commercially available household products, and in high concentration has the potential to elicit sensory irritation in the eyes and upper respiratory tract of humans. The goal of the present study was to evaluate the irritation potential of ammonia in asthmatics and healthy volunteers and to determine whether differences in nasal or ocular irritant sensitivity to ammonia between these two groups could account for the exacerbation of symptoms reported by asthmatics following exposure to an irritant. Twenty-five healthy and 15 mild/moderate persistent asthmatic volunteers, with reported sensitivity to household cleaning products, were evaluated for their sensitivity to the ocular and nasal irritancy of NH₃. Lung function was evaluated at baseline and multiple time points following exposure. Irritation thresholds did not differ between asthmatics and healthy controls, nor did ratings of odor intensity, annoyance, and irritancy following exposure to NH₃ concentrations at and above the irritant threshold for longer periods of time (30 s). Importantly, no changes in lung function occurred following exposure to NH₃ for any individuals in either group. Thus, despite heightened symptom reports to environmental irritants among asthmatics, the ocular and nasal trigeminal system of mild to moderate asthmatics does not appear to be more sensitive or more reactive than that of nonasthmatics, nor does short-duration exposure to ammonia at irritant levels induce changes in lung function. At least in brief exposures, the basis for some asthmatics to experience adverse responses to volatile compounds in everyday life may arise from factors other than trigeminally mediated reflexes.     

The effects of n-butanol vapour on respiratory rate and tidal volume

Exposure to n-butanol vapour gave rise to a sensory irritation response which was measured by the reflexively induced decrease in respiratory rate in mice according to the American standard method (E981-84). The response reached maximum within the 1st min of exposure. In this period the expected threshold response (RD-0) and the concentration expected to depress the respiratory rate by 50% (RD-50) were extrapolated to be 233 ppm and 11696 ppm, respectively. The response followed the dynamics of a bimolecular reaction between butanol and the sensory irritant receptor. For concentrations below 3000 ppm, the response faded due to desensitization. However, concentrations above 3000 ppm gave rise to a new decrease in respiratory rate due to activation of lung receptors. Two types of lung receptors, probably J-receptors and stretch receptors, were involved. The sensory irritation response measured by the standard method gave a threshold response which was comparable to that found by electrophysiological experiments in rats. The irritation response in man as well as the maximum allowable concentration in the working environment were adequately predicted from the sensory irritation response in mice.     

Computer-based bioassay for evaluation of sensory irritation of airborne chemicals and its limit of detection

We expanded a previously described rule-based computerized method to recognize the sensory irritating effect of airborne chemicals. Using 2-chlorobenzylchloride (CBC) as a sensory irritant, characteristic modifications of the normal breathing pattern of exposed mice were evaluated by measuring the duration of braking (TB) after inspiration and the resulting decrease in breathing frequency. From the measurement of TB, each breath was then classified as normal (N) or sensory irritation (S). Using increasing exposure concentrations, the classification S increased from ≤2% (equivalent to sham-exposure) to 100% within a narrow exposure concentration range. The potency of CBC was then evaluated by calculating the concentration necessary to produce 50% of the breaths classified as S, i.e., S₅₀. This approach is easier to use than obtaining RD₅₀ (decrease in respiratory frequency by 50%) when high exposure concentrations are difficult to achieve. Detection limits were also established for this bioassay and experiments were conducted to obtain a level of response just around these limits, in order to delineate the practicality of using this bioassay at low exposure concentrations. Using this approach, sensory irritation was the only effect induced by CBC at low exposure concentrations. However, bronchoconstriction and pulmonary irritation were superimposed on this effect at higher exposure concentrations. Received: 9 December 1997 / Accepted: 6 January 1997     

Methanol and formic acid toxicity: biochemical mechanisms.

Metabolism of methanol, methyl ethers, esters and amides give rise to formic acid. This acid is an inhibitor of the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase causing histotoxic hypoxia. Formic acid is a weaker inhibitor than cyanide and hydrosulphide anions. The body burden of formate in methanol poisoning is high enough to cause acidosis, and other clinical symptoms. Part of the protons can be attributed to formic acid whereas the most significant acid load results from the hypoxic metabolism. The acidosis causes e.g. dilatation of cerebral vessels, facilitation of the entry of calcium ions into cells, loss of lysosomal latency and deranged production of ATP. The latter effect seems to impede parathormone-dependent calcium reabsorption in the kidney tubules. Besides, urinary acidification is affected by formic acid. Its excretion causes continuous recycling of the acid by the tubular cell Cl-/formate exchanger. This sequence of events may partially explain an accumulation of formate in urine. Occupational exposure to vapours of methanol and formic acid can be quantitatively monitored by urinary formic acid determinations. Formic acid toxicity may prove a suitable model for agents causing histotoxic hypoxia.     

Acute airway effects of diacetyl in mice

Occupational exposures to the butter flavouring agent diacetyl (2,3-butanedione) have caused lung inflammation and severe airflow limitation due to bronchiolitis obliterans. Diacetyl is naturally present in butter, beer, white wine, etc., and its pleasant odour is easily recognized by consumers. However, this pleasant odour may induce a false sense of safety when higher airborne concentrations are encountered in industrial use. In this study, the acute warning properties, in terms of sensory irritation, that could be useful to prevent workers from exposures to a high concentration were first investigated in a mouse bioassay. Then at higher exposure concentrations, the possibility of airflow limitation and pulmonary irritation were studied with the same mouse bioassay. Diacetyl induces concentration-dependent irritation in all parts of the respiratory tract during a 2-h exposure period. The no-observed-effect levels for each effect in the mice were above 100?ppm and initiation of sensory irritation in humans was estimated to occur above 20?ppm. No acute warning signal from the airways is expected at diacetyl levels that have caused bronchiolitis obliterans and other toxic effects. The sensory irritation effect, which occurred rapidly upon initiation of exposure, faded rapidly. Furthermore, high-level diacetyl exposures decreased the sensory irritation warning signal in mice upon repeated exposure, which suggests that the compound is especially insidious.     

Sensory irritation and pulmonary irritation of cumene and n-propanol: mechanisms of receptor activation and desensitization

Cumene and n-propanol, model substances for alcohols and alkylbenzenes, were investigated for sensory irritation in mice. The concentrations within the first 2 min. depressing the respiratory rate by 50% due to the effect in the upper respiratory tract were 2,058 p.p.m. and 22,080 p.p.m., respectively. Activation of the sensory irritant receptor followed the dynamics of reversible bimolecular reactions. The extrapolated maximum response and the apparent dissociation constant were 114.3% and 2,723 p.p.m. for cumene and 68.4% and 8,178 p.p.m. for propanol, respectively. Later on desensitization was observed. The effect was weak for cumene but conspicuous for propanol. For cumene desensitization had the origin in the rise of a threshold. No change in the dissociation constant or the maximum response was found. For propanol a decrease in the maximum response, which may be explained by an allosteric effect, was observed. The pulmonary irritation response was weak for cumene but was for propanol more important than sensory irritation at high concentrations. The following hypotheses are put forward: the effect of pulmonary irritation on the tidal volume is mediated via the stretch receptors while the effect on the respiratory frequency is mediated via the J-receptors.     

Sensory irritation to mixtures of formaldehyde,acrolein, and acetaldehyde in rats

 Sensory irritation of formaldehyde (FRM), acrolein (ACR) and acetaldehyde (ACE) as measured by the decrease in breathing frequency (DBF) was studied in male Wistar rats using nose-only exposure. Groups of four rats were exposed to each of the single compounds separately or to mixtures of FRM, ACR and/or ACE. Exposure concentrations of the mixtures were chosen in such a way that summation of the effects of each chemical would be expected not to exceed 80% reduction of the breathing frequency. FRM, ACR and ACE appeared to act as sensory irritants as defined by Alarie (1966, 1973). With FRM and ACR desensitization occurred, whereas with ACE the breathing frequency gradually decreased with increasing exposure time (up to 30 min). For mixtures, the observed DBF was more pronounced than the DBF for each compound separately, but was less than the sum of the DBFs for the single compounds. A model for three compounds competing for the same receptor was applied to predict the DBF of mixtures of FRM, ACE and ACR. The results also showed that with mixtures no desensitization occurred; in fact, the breathing frequency further decreased in the last 15 min of exposure. These observations were similar to those found for ACE alone, and might have been caused by effects on the upper respiratory tract. The results of the present study allow the conclusion that sensory irritation in rats exposed to mixtures of irritant aldehydes is more pronounced than that caused by each of the aldehydes separately, and that the DBF as a result of exposure to a mixture could well be predicted using a model for competitive agonism, thus providing evidence that the combined effect of these aldehydes is basically a result of competition for a common receptor (trigeminal nerve). Received: 24 April 1995/Accepted: 26 September 1995     

Acute airway effects of formaldehyde and ozone in BALB/c mice.

1. Concentration and time-effect relationships of formaldehyde and ozone on the airways were investigated in BALB/c mice. The effects were obtained by continuous monitoring of the respiratory rate, tidal volume, expiratory flow rate, time of inspiration, time of expiration, and respiratory patterns. 2. With concentrations up to 4 p.p.m., formaldehyde showed mainly sensory irritation effects of the upper airways that decrease the respiratory rate from a trigeminal reflex. The no-effect level (NOEL) was about 0.3 p.p.m. This value is close to the human NOEL, which is about 0.08 p.p.m. 3. Ozone caused rapid, shallow breathing in BALB/c mice. Later on, the respiratory rate decreased due to another vagal response that indicated an incipient lung oedema. The NOEL in mice was about 1 p.p.m. during 30 min of ozone exposure. No major effect occurs in resting humans at about 0.4 p.p.m. 4. Thus, the upper airway irritant, formaldehyde, and the deep lung irritant, ozone, showed the same types of respiratory effects in humans and in BALB/c mice. Also, the sensitivity was nearly identical. Continuous monitoring of respiratory effects in BALB/c mice, therefore, may be a valuable method for the study of effects of other environmental pollutants, which, however, should be confirmed in further studies.     

Acute airway effects of ozone-initiated d-limonene chemistry: importance of gaseous products

There are concerns about ozone-initiated chemistry, because the formation of gaseous oxidation products and ultrafine particles may increase complaints, morbidity and mortality. Here we address the question whether the gaseous products or the ultrafine particles from the ozone-initiated chemistry of limonene, a common and abundant indoor pollutant, cause acute airway effects. The effects on the airways by d-limonene, a ca. 16s old ozone/d-limonene mixture, and clean air were evaluated by a mice bioassay, from which sensory irritation of the upper airways, airflow limitation, and pulmonary irritation can be obtained. A denuder was inserted to separate the ultrafine particles from the gaseous products prior to the exposure chamber. Reduction of mean respiratory frequency (>30%) and 230% increase of time of brake were observed without denuder, during 30min exposure, to the ozonolyzed d-limonene mixture, which are indicative of prominent sensory effects. The initial concentrations (ppm) were 40 d-limonene and 4 ozone. The exposure concentrations (ppm) were about 35 d-limonene and 0.05 ozone. Formaldehyde and residual d-limonene, the salient sensory irritants, accounted for up to three-fourth of the sensory irritation. The upper airway effects reversed to baseline upon cessation of exposure. An effect on the conducting airways was also significant, which did not reverse completely upon cessation. Airway effects were absent with the denuder inserted, which did not alter the size distribution of ultrafine particles ( approximately 10mg/m(3)), significantly. The result was statistically indistinguishable from clean dry air. It is concluded that ultrafine particles that are generated from ozone-initiated d-limonene chemistry and denuded are not causative of sensory effects in the airways.     

Interactions of sulfur dioxide and acrolein as sensory irritants.

Sulfur dioxide/acrolein atmospheres were evaluated for their sensory irritation potential by monitoring the respiratory rate of groups of mice during 5-min control, 10-min exposure, and 5-min postexposure periods. The results demonstrated that depending upon the concentration ratio of these sensory irritants, either irritant can alter, or completely block, the effect of the other during the exposure. Following exposure to these mixtures, recovery was extremely slow, unlike the rapid recovery observed with each irritant alone.     

An attempt to define a just detectable effect for airborne chemicals on the respiratory tract in mice

 We have attempted to define a just detectable effect (JDE) for three different types of reactions along the respiratory tract: (a) sensory irritation of the upper airways (S), (b) airflow limitation along the conducting airways (A), and (c) pulmonary irritation at the alveolar level (P1 or P). Each type of reaction, S, A, P1 or P, was recognized by analyzing the breathing pattern of unanesthetized mice held in body plethysmographs. A rule-based computer program analyzed each breath during a period of 3.75 h and classified each breath as normal (N) or falling in any of the above categories (i.e., S, A, P1 or P). Eight groups of four mice were used for sham exposures: exposed to water vapor. These data sets were used, as sham exposure data, to define the variation which can occur with time in order to define an expected range of normal variation. Once this range was established, we defined JDE values for each type of effect and used such values to evaluate the results obtained in exposed animals. Eight groups of four mice were exposed to a mixture of airborne chemicals, machining fluid G (MFG), at concentrations from 0.17 to 55 mg/m³. Data sets for individual animals and for each group of animals exposed to MFG were analyzed to determine if and when a particular effect occurred. It was possible to recognize the effects of low exposure concentrations on groups of exposed animals or individual animals within each group. This procedure will be valuable when investigating the effect of airborne chemicals and when it is impossible to generate high exposure concentrations to define concentration-response relationships. Received: 4 October 1995/Accepted: 20 December 1995     

Evaluation of trigeminal sensitivity to ammonia in asthmatics and healthy human volunteers

Asthmatics often report the triggering or exacerbation of respiratory symptoms following exposure to airborne irritants, which in some cases may result from stimulation of irritant receptors in the upper airways inducing reflexive bronchoconstriction. Ammonia (NH3) is a common constituent of commercially available household products, and in high concentration has the potential to elicit sensory irritation in the eyes and upper respiratory tract of humans. The goal of the present study was to evaluate the irritation potential of ammonia in asthmatics and healthy volunteers and to determine whether differences in nasal or ocular irritant sensitivity to ammonia between these two groups could account for the exacerbation of symptoms reported by asthmatics following exposure to an irritant. Twenty-five healthy and 15 mild/moderate persistent asthmatic volunteers, with reported sensitivity to household cleaning products, were evaluated for their sensitivity to the ocular and nasal irritancy of NH3. Lung function was evaluated at baseline and multiple time points following exposure. Irritation thresholds did not differ between asthmatics and healthy controls, nor did ratings of odor intensity, annoyance, and irritancy following exposure to NH3 concentrations at and above the irritant threshold for longer periods of time (30 s). Importantly, no changes in lung function occurred following exposure to NH3 for any individuals in either group. Thus, despite heightened symptom reports to environmental irritants among asthmatics, the ocular and nasal trigeminal system of mild to moderate asthmatics does not appear to be more sensitive or more reactive than that of nonasthmatics, nor does short-duration exposure to ammonia at irritant levels induce changes in lung function. At least in brief exposures, the basis for some asthmatics to experience adverse responses to volatile compounds in everyday life may arise from factors other than trigeminally mediated reflexes.     

Sensory Irritation and Pulmonary Irritation by Airborne AUyl Acetate,AUyl Alcohol,and Allyl Ether Compared to Acrolein

Abstract: The propene derivatives, allyl acetate, allyl alcohol, allyl ether, and acrolein were investigated for their property as sensory irritant in Ssc:CF-1 mice. The concentration of the chemicals necessary to depress the respiratory rate by 50% (RD50) due to sensory irritation of the upper respiratory tract were 2.9, 3.9, 5.0 and 2.9 p.p.m., respectively. The potency of these propene derivatives varied very little for their concentration in air, in p.p.m., to depress the respiratory rate by 50%. However, when the potency is expressed in terms of thermodynamic activity acrolein was found to be 10 times more potent than the other propene derivates. This may be explained either by a higher reactivity of the carbon-carbon double bond or the involvement of the aldehyde group in a secondary chemical binding. No secondary chemical binding can be invoked for allyl acetate, allyl alcohol or allyl ether. In general, the chemical structure CH₂=CH-CH-O may be suspected to allow a molecule to act as a strong sensory irritant. The TLV's were predicted from the relation: TLV0.03 ± RD50 and were found to be 0.1, 0.1, 0.15, and 0.1 for allyl acetate, allyl alcohol, allyl ether, and acrolein, respectively. No pulmonary irritation was found at the concentration causing a 50% decrease in respiratory rate.