The efficacy and safety of rituximab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite methotrexate treatment: results of a phase IIB randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging trial

OBJECTIVE: To examine the efficacy and safety of different rituximab doses plus methotrexate (MTX), with or without glucocorticoids, in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) resistant to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), including biologic agents. METHODS: A total of 465 patients were randomized into 9 treatment groups: 3 rituximab groups (placebo [n = 149], 500 mg [n = 124], or 1,000 mg [n = 192] on days 1 and 15) each also taking either placebo glucocorticoids, intravenous methylprednisolone premedication, or intravenous methylprednisolone premedication plus oral prednisone for 2 weeks. All patients received MTX (10-25 mg/week); no other DMARDs were permitted. RESULTS: Significantly more patients who received 2 500-mg or 2 1,000-mg infusions of rituximab met the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria (achieved an ACR20 response) at week 24 (55% and 54%, respectively) compared with placebo (28%; P < 0.0001). ACR50 responses were achieved by 33%, 34%, and 13% of patients, respectively (P < 0.001), and ACR70 responses were achieved by 13%, 20%, and 5% of patients (P < 0.05). Changes in the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (-1.79, -2.05, -0.67; P < 0.0001) and moderate to good responses on the European League Against Rheumatism criteria (P < 0.0001) reflected the ACR criteria responses. Glucocorticoids did not contribute significantly to the primary efficacy end point, ACR20 response at 24 weeks. Intravenous glucocorticoid premedication reduced the frequency and intensity of first infusion-associated events; oral glucocorticoids conferred no additional safety benefit. Rituximab was well tolerated; the type and severity of infections was similar to those for placebo. CONCLUSION: Both rituximab doses were effective and well tolerated when added to MTX therapy in patients with active RA. The primary end point (ACR20 response) was independent of glucocorticoids, although intravenous glucocorticoid premedication improved tolerability during the first rituximab infusion.     

Golimumab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite treatment with methotrexate: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy, safety, and pharmacology of subcutaneous administration of golimumab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) despite treatment with methotrexate (MTX). METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned in a double-blinded manner to receive injections of placebo plus MTX or 50 mg or 100 mg golimumab every 2 or 4 weeks plus MTX through week 48. Patients originally assigned to receive injections every 2 weeks had the interval increased to every 4 weeks starting at week 20. The primary end point was the proportion of patients meeting the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria (achieving an ACR20 response) at week 16. The study was powered to detect a difference in the primary end point when the combined golimumab groups and at least 1 of the individual dose groups were compared with placebo. RESULTS: The primary end point was attained. Sixty-one percent of patients in the combined golimumab plus MTX dose groups achieved an ACR20 response at week 16 compared with 37% of patients in the placebo plus MTX group (P=0.010). In addition, 79% of patients in the group receiving 100 mg golimumab every 2 weeks achieved an ACR20 response (P<0.001 versus placebo). Through week 20 (after which patients receiving placebo were switched to active infliximab therapy), serious adverse events were reported in 9% of patients in the combined golimumab groups and in 6% of patients in the placebo group. CONCLUSION: Golimumab plus MTX effectively reduces the signs and symptoms of RA and is generally well tolerated in patients with an inadequate response to MTX.     

Safety and efficacy of combination therapy of iguratimod with methotrexate for patients with active rheumatoid arthritis with an inadequate response to methotrexate: An open-label extension of a randomized,double-blind,placebo-controlled trial

Abstract

Objective. To obtain safety and efficacy data on combination treatment with iguratimod and methotrexate (MTX) in an open-label extension study in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods. Following a 28-week, randomized, double-blind trial of adding iguratimod or placebo to stable MTX therapy, patients entered a 24-week extension. Patients randomized to the iguratimod + MTX group continued treatment. Patients treated with placebo + MTX switched to iguratimod + MTX [the (placebo/iguratimod) + MTX group].

Results. In the iguratimod + MTX group, the rate of 20% improvement in American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR20) at week 52 (71.3%) was similar to that at week 24 (69.5%). ACR50, ACR70 and Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index at week 52 significantly improved compared with the values at week 24. In the (placebo/iguratimod + MTX) group, the switch to iguratimod treatment significantly improved ACR20 from 30.7% at week 24 to 72.1% at week 52. Frequent adverse events for 52 weeks in the iguratimod + MTX group were nasopharyngitis, upper respiratory tract inflammation, stomatitis, lymphocyte decrease, AST increase, ALT increase and blood iron decrease. These adverse events were predominantly mild or moderate in severity. No deaths occurred.

Conclusion. Efficacy and tolerance of iguratimod + MTX therapy was maintained to 52 weeks in patients with active RA with inadequate response to MTX.     

Efficacy and safety of tofacitinib as monotherapy in Japanese patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: a 12-week,randomized, phase 2 study

Abstract

Objectives. To evaluate oral tofacitinib versus placebo for treatment of active rheumatoid arthritis in Japanese patients with inadequate response to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs.

Methods. In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, parallel-group, 12-week, phase 2 study (clinicaltrials.gov NCT00687193), 317 patients received tofacitinib: 1, 3, 5, 10, or 15 mg as monotherapy or placebo twice daily (BID). Primary endpoint: response rate by American College of Rheumatology (ACR) ≥ 20% improvement criteria (ACR20) at week 12.

Results. ACR20 response rates: 37.7% (20/53), 67.9% (36/53), 73.1% (38/52), 84.9% (45/53), and 90.7% (49/54) with tofacitinib: 1, 3, 5, 10, and 15 mg BID, respectively, versus 15.4% (8/52) with placebo (p < 0.01; all doses). Dose-dependent ACR20 responses with tofacitinib versus placebo occurred from week 2 onward (p < 0.05). Changes from baseline in 28-joint disease activity score using erythrocyte sedimentation rate improved with tofacitinib versus placebo from week 4 (p < 0.01; all doses). Six tofacitinib patients experienced treatment-related serious adverse events (AEs). Most common treatment-emergent AEs: nasopharyngitis (10% vs 12%) and hyperlipidemia (5% vs 0%). Serum creatinine, hemoglobin, and total-, low-, and high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol levels increased with tofacitinib.

Conclusions. Tofacitinib produced dose-dependent ACR20 responses and reduced disease activity. The safety profile was consistent with that reported from global monotherapy trials.     

Comparative efficacy and safety of biosimilar adalimumab and originator adalimumab in combination with methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

We aimed to assess the relative efficacy and safety of biosimilar adalimumab and originator adalimumab plus methotrexate (MTX) compared to those of placebo plus MTX in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who showed an inadequate response to MTX. We performed a Bayesian network meta-analysis to combine direct and indirect evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining the efficacy and safety of biosimilar + MTX and adalimumab + MTX versus placebo + MTX (MTX group) in patients with active RA despite treatment with MTX. A total of eight RCTs involving 2543 patients met the inclusion criteria. The ACR20 response rate was significantly higher in the biosimilar + MTX (odds ratio [OR] 2.91, 95% credible interval [CrI] 1.57–5.74) and adalimumab + MTX (OR 2.80, 95% CrI 1.81–4.46) groups than in the MTX group, with no difference in the ACR20 response rate between the biosimilar + MTX and adalimumab + MTX groups. Biosimilar + MTX had the highest probability of being the best treatment in terms of the ACR20 response rate (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA]?=?0.7896), followed by adalimumab + MTX (SUCRA?=?0.7082) and MTX (SUCRA?=?0.0022). The ACR50 and ACR70 response rates showed a distribution pattern similar to that of the ACR20 response rate. Safety based on the number of serious adverse events did not differ significantly among the three interventions in the follow-up period of 12 to 24 weeks. Biosimilar and originator adalimumab, in combination with MTX, represent an effective intervention for active RA despite treatment with MTX. No significant difference was found between biosimilar and originator adalimumab in terms of efficacy and safety. However, follow-up in RCTs is short and not all safety outcomes can be assessed in RCTs. Thus, additional long-term evaluations are needed.     

Efficacy of tacrolimus in rheumatoid arthritis patients who have been treated unsuccessfully with methotrexate: a six-month,double-blind,randomized, dose-ranging study

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy, safety, and optimal dose of tacrolimus monotherapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: This phase II, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled monotherapy study was set in 12 community sites and 9 university-based sites. Two hundred sixty-eight patients with RA who were resistant to or intolerant of methotrexate (mean dose 15.2 mg/week) and had active disease for at least 6 months (mean tender joint count 28.2, mean erythrocyte sedimentation rate 46.5 mm/hour) were randomized to receive treatment after discontinuation of methotrexate. Those who received at least 1 dose of tacrolimus were analyzed; 141 completed the study. Stable dosages of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and low-dose prednisone were allowed during treatment. All patients were given 1, 3, or 5 mg of tacrolimus or placebo once daily for 24 weeks. The American College of Rheumatology definition of 20% improvement (ACR20) and the tender and swollen joint counts at the end of treatment were the primary outcomes. RESULTS: ACR20 response rates demonstrated a clear dose response. The ACR20 response was observed in 15.5% of patients receiving placebo (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 7.1-23.9%), 29% of the 1 mg tacrolimus group (95% CI 18.3-39.7%) (P < 0.058); 34.4% of the 3 mg group (95% CI 22.7-46.0%) (P < 0.013), and 50% of the 5 mg group (95% CI 37.8-62.3%) (P < or = 0.001). The tender joint count improved statistically significantly in all tacrolimus groups. The swollen joint count, physical function, and patient-assessed pain improved statistically significantly in the 3 mg and 5 mg groups. The incidence of creatinine elevation > or =40% above baseline levels increased in a dose-dependent manner. Dropout rates were high (41-59%) and were more common for inefficacy in the placebo patients (71.4%), whereas they were more common for toxicity in the high-dose tacrolimus groups (31-33%). Discontinuation for creatinine elevation occurred in the 3 mg (3.1%) and 5 mg (10.9%) tacrolimus groups. CONCLUSION: Tacrolimus improved disease activity in methotrexate-resistant or -intolerant patients with RA. A dose response was observed when efficacy and toxicity were assessed at different doses. The optimal dose of tacrolimus appears to be >1 mg but < or=3 mg daily.     

Tacrolimus in rheumatoid arthritis patients receiving concomitant methotrexate: a six-month, open-label study

OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety of tacrolimus used in combination with oral methotrexate (MTX) to control the signs and symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in patients whose disease remains active despite treatment with MTX. METHODS: This was a multicenter open-label study conducted at 13 US sites. Eighty patients who at baseline had active RA (mean tender/painful joint count 29.4, mean swollen joint count 17.4, mean erythrocyte sedimentation rate 25.1 mm/hour) despite treatment for >/=1 month with a stable, maximally tolerated dosage of oral MTX (/=30% maximum increase in the Cr level from baseline during the study, with the Cr level in 3 patients (3.8%) exceeding the range considered normal for their age and sex. The maximum Cr level during the study was 1.8 mg/dl. The ACR20 clinical response rate at the end of treatment was 52.5% (95% confidence interval 41.6-63.4%). CONCLUSION: In patients whose active RA persists despite treatment with MTX, tacrolimus in combination with MTX is safe and well-tolerated and provides clinical benefit.     

依那西普治疗中国接受甲氨蝶呤治疗的活动性类风湿关节炎患者随机双盲多中心对照研究

目的 研究依那西普每周1次皮下注射50 mg对接受甲氨蝶呤(MTX)治疗的中国活动性类风湿关节炎(RA)患者的疗效及安全性.方法 本研究由2部分组成:12周双盲治疗阶段和12周安全性开放研究阶段.双盲期间的随机通过临床操作随机化(CORE)系统完成.在双盲阶段,RA患者被随机分配到依那西普50mg治疗组或安慰剂组,每周1次皮下注射给药,同时坚持一定剂量MTX给药.完成双盲治疗的RA患者在开放治疗中均接受每周1次依那西普50 mg和MTX给药.以美国风湿病学会(ACR)疗效评价指标ACR 20为主要终点疗效指标.次要终点疗效指标包括医生和患者总体评价、晨僵持续时间、疼痛目视模拟测试表(VAS)、健康评估问卷(HAQ)、C反应蛋白(CRP)值、疼痛和肿胀关节数.并且比较2组的安全性结果.采用Fisher精确概率法对主要终点疗效指标第12周ACR 20应答情况及其他次要终点疗效指标进行分析.使用协方差方法分析连续终点相对于基线的变化.结果 双盲治疗期间修正的意向性治疗人群(Mitt)共有156例患者,其中依那西普+MTX组77例.安慰剂+MTX组79例,149例患者完成双盲阶段的治疗.治疗4周时,依那西普+MTX组ACR 20有效率为39%(30/77),安慰剂+MTX组为16%(13/79),差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);12周时,依那西普+MTX组ACR 20有效率为62%(48/77),安慰剂+MTX组为23%(18/79),差异有统计学意义(P<0.01).其他疗效指标包括医生和患者总体评价、晨僵持续时间、疼痛VAS、HAQ、CRP、触痛关节数、肿胀关节数等均从第4周开始,在依那西普+MTX组明显优于安慰剂+MTX组(P<0.01).总的不良反应发生率在2组间差异无统计学意义.结论 与安慰剂治疗活动性RA相比.依那西普治疗活动性RA起效迅速、疗效显著.依那西普50 mg+MTX每周1次给药治疗中国成年活动性RA患者24周,耐受性良好.     

Combination treatment with methotrexate, cyclosporine, and intraarticular betamethasone compared with methotrexate and intraarticular betamethasone in early active rheumatoid arthritis: an investigator-initiated, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether disease control can be achieved in early active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) by treatment with methotrexate and intraarticular betamethasone, and whether the addition of cyclosporine to the regimen has any additional effect. METHODS: Patients (n = 160) were randomized to receive methotrexate 7.5 mg/week plus cyclosporine 2.5 mg/kg of body weight/day (combination therapy) or methotrexate plus placebo-cyclosporine (monotherapy). At weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, and 8 and every 4 weeks thereafter, betamethasone was injected into swollen joints (maximum 4 joints or 4 ml per visit). Beginning at week 8, if synovitis was present, the methotrexate dosage was increased stepwise up to 20 mg/week, with a subsequent stepwise increase in the cyclosporine or placebo-cyclosporine dosage up to 4 mg/kg. RESULTS: At 52 weeks, 20% improvement according to the American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR20) was achieved in 85% of the combination therapy group versus 68% of the monotherapy group (P = 0.02). The median individual overall ACR response (ACR-N) in the 2 groups was 80.0% (interquartile range 40.1-91.8%) and 54.5% (interquartile range 2.4-87.8%), respectively (P = 0.025). At 48 and 52 weeks, ACR remission criteria were met in 35% of the combination therapy group and 28% of the monotherapy group. Progression in the Larsen score at 52 weeks was -0.2 +/- 6.5 and 0.4 +/- 6.9 (mean +/- SD) in the combination therapy and monotherapy groups, respectively. Serum creatinine levels increased by 7%, and hypertrichosis was more prevalent, in the combination therapy group. CONCLUSION: Combined treatment with methotrexate and intraarticular glucocorticoid showed excellent disease control and stopped the progression of erosions in patients with early active RA, who had a poor prognosis. Addition of cyclosporine improved the ACR20 and ACR-N responses, whereas the ACR50 and ACR70 responses, remission rates, and radiographic changes did not differ between the 2 study groups.     

短期益赛普与甲氨蝶呤环磷酰胺联合治疗类风湿关节炎的临床研究

目的 探讨短期使用重组人Ⅱ型肿瘤坏死因子受体一抗体融合蛋白(rhTNFR:Fc,益普赛)与甲氨蝶呤(MTX)、环磷酰胺(CTX)联合治疗类风湿关节炎(RA)的有效性和安全性.方法 对84例患者随机分为实验组和对照组,仅有56例患者完成了本实验.实验组给予益赛普皮下注射治疗3个月,每周2次,每次25 mg;同时给予MTX治疗,每周1次,每次7.5～15 mg;CTX每3周1次,每次200 mg,3个月后给予空白模拟益赛普,继续接受MTX和CTX维持治疗.对照组给予益赛普皮下注射治疗,剂量及方法同实验组,同时给予空白模拟MTX和CTX对照,疗程为1年,随时观察并记录治疗过程中的任何不良事件,在0、2、4、8、12、24、36、52周监测其血常规、红细胞沉降率(ESR)、肝功能、肾功能、类风湿因子(RF)、抗环瓜氨酸肽(CCP)抗体.结果 实验组和对照组在ACR20,ACR70,ESR及CRP实验室指标均较入组时有明显改善,但两组问差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).治疗12周实验组停用益赛普时,两组的上述指标均进一步改善.疗程满36周时,实验组较对照组的各项指标仍持续好转,相关抗体水平浓度较对照组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),两组间的不良反应率差异无统计学意义.结论 短期益赛普与MTX、CTX联合治疗RA,可以减少益赛普的疗程,有效地缓解RA的症状和降低抗体水平,并不增加不良反应,具有较好的安全性.     

Efficacy and safety of iguratimod compared with placebo and salazosulfapyridine in active rheumatoid arthritis: a controlled, multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group study

We conducted a 28-week, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study of iguratimod in 376 Japanese patients with active rheumatoid arthritis to compare the efficacy and safety of the drug with those of placebo and salazosulfapyridine. In the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 response rate, iguratimod was superior to placebo (53.8% versus 17.2%; Fisher's exact test, P < 0.001) and was not inferior to salazosulfapyridine (63.1% versus 57.7%, 95% confidence interval for the rate difference, −7.9% to 18.7%). Iguratimod began exhibiting its therapeutic effect within 8 weeks after the initiation of treatment and was effective even in patients who had a poor response to previous treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. No statistically significant difference was noted in the incidence of adverse reactions between iguratimod and salazosulfapyridine. The study results suggest that iguratimod could become a new option for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.     

Treatment of early rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized magnetic resonance imaging study comparing the effects of methotrexate alone, methotrexate in combination with infliximab, and methotrexate in combination with intravenous pulse methylprednisolone

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of methotrexate (MTX), alone or in combination with intravenous (IV) methylprednisolone (MP) or infliximab, on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-detected synovitis, bone edema, and erosive changes in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Forty-four patients with early RA were randomized to receive MTX alone (MTX group), MTX plus IV MP (IV MP group), or MTX plus infliximab (infliximab group), infused on day 0 and weeks 2, 6, 14, 22, 30, 38, and 46. Gadolinium-enhanced MRI scans of the metacarpophalangeal joints, wrists, and metatarsophalangeal joints were performed at baseline, week 18, and week 52. RESULTS: Scores for MRI-detected synovitis and bone edema improved over time in the 3 groups, with significantly lower synovitis scores in the infliximab group compared with the MTX group and significantly lower bone edema scores in the infliximab group compared with the MTX and the IV MP groups. Scores for MRI-detected erosion significantly increased over time in all groups. There were no differences in erosion scores between the MTX group and the other groups. It is of note that patients treated with IV MP showed more significant progression in MRI-detected erosions compared with patients treated with infliximab. At week 22, response rates according to the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria (ACR20), the ACR50, and the ACR70 were significantly higher in both the IV MP group and the infliximab group compared with the MTX group. At week 52, remission was achieved in 40% of patients in the MTX group and in 70% of patients in the IV MP and infliximab groups. Health Assessment Questionnaire scores improved significantly over time in all groups, with patients receiving IV MP experiencing significantly more improvement compared with patients treated with MTX alone. No severe side effects were observed, except 1 case of MTX-related pneumonitis. CONCLUSION: The combination of MTX and infliximab is superior to MTX alone for reducing MRI-detected signs of synovitis and bone edema in patients with early RA. Progression of MRI-detected erosion was greater in patients treated with MTX plus IV MP compared with that in patients who received MTX plus infliximab.