文拉法辛合并小剂量舒必利治疗抑郁障碍的对照研究

目的探讨用文拉法辛并小量舒必利治疗抑郁障碍的疗效与副反应。方法将32例单相抑郁患者和32例双相障碍抑郁患者分别随机分成2组，分别接受文拉法辛合并小剂量舒必利治疗（研究组）及单用文拉法辛治疗（对照组），共治疗6用。用汉密尔顿抑郁量表（HAMD）、汉密尔顿焦虑量表（HAMA）及犬体评定量表（CGI—CI）评估疗效，用副反应量表（TESS）评估治疗不良反应。结果在单相抑郁患者中，研究组在第2、4、6周末的HAMD、HAMA和CGI评分均显著少于对照组，且均有显著性差异（P〈0．05）。在双相障碍抑郁患者中，研究组在第2、4、6周末的HAMD、HAMA和CGI评分均显著少于对照组，且均有显著性差异（P〈0．05）。研究组与对照组在不良反应方面比较无显著性差异（P〉O．05）。结论文拉法辛合并小量舒必利治疗单相抑郁或双相障碍抑郁患者具有疗效好，起效快，副反应较少特点。     

文拉法辛治疗焦虑抑郁共病对照研究

目的：探讨文拉法辛与帕罗西汀治疗焦虑抑郁共病障碍的疗效及安全性。方法：73例焦虑抑郁共病障碍患者随机分为研究组35例和对照组38例。分别给予文拉法辛和帕罗西汀治疗8周。于治疗前后分别采用汉密尔顿焦虑量表（HAMA）、汉密尔顿抑郁量表（HAMD）及治疗中出现的症状量表（TESS）评定疗效和不良反应。结果：两组抗抑郁显效率（χ2=0.69,P〉0.05）和抗焦虑显效率（χ2=0.90,P〉0.05）相仿。两组HAMD、HAMA治疗后均显著下降（P〈0.05或P〈0.01）。不良反应均轻微（P〉0.05）。结论：文拉法辛与帕罗西汀治疗焦虑抑郁共病障碍疗效肯定,安全性高,依从性好。     

舒必利治疗焦虑、抑郁症状的疗效分析

对４０例患有焦虑、抑郁症状的患者进行舒必利治疗。观察时间为８周，剂量０．４～０．８ｇ／日。治疗１周内开始见效。４０例患者的总有效率为１００％，其中痊愈６０％，显著好转３５％，好转５％。以对焦虑症状的疗效最为显著，其次为抑郁改善，对失眠亦有治疗作用。提示此药可作为抗焦虑、抑郁剂在临床应用。     

抑郁与焦虑共病及文拉法辛缓释剂治疗

过去对精神疾病的诊断往往强调一元化的诊断原则，因为尽管某种疾病可以出现另外一种疾病的一些症状，但这些症状不占主要地位或持续时间很短，则应维持原来的诊断。例如大约近半数的精神分裂症病人可伴有抑郁症状，但这些抑郁症状多发生于分裂症状之后，持续时间较短，在临床表现中不占主要地位，因此仍然应该诊断为精神分裂症。     

文拉法辛缓释剂治疗焦虑障碍2例

有研究表明，文拉法辛缓释剂治疗抑郁症可获得更高的治愈率，现报告2例如下。     

文拉法辛与舍曲林治疗癫痫性抑郁障碍的对照研究

目的探讨文拉法辛和舍曲林治疗癫痫性抑郁障碍的疗效和安全性。方法将64例符合CCMD-3癫痫性抑郁障碍患者随机分为两组,在维持原抗癫痫药物的治疗基础上,分别给予文拉法辛和舍曲林治疗,疗程6周。采用汉密尔顿抑郁量表（HAMD）。汉密尔顿焦虑量表（HAMA）和副反应量表（TESS）评定疗效和不良反应。结果文拉法辛组显效率为83.3%,舍曲林组的显效率为76.7%。两者疗效相当。舍曲林组有2例引起癫痫发作次数增加,而文拉法辛对癫痫无明显影响。结论文拉法辛治疗癫痫性抑郁障碍疗效肯定,不良反应小,临床上可作为首选药物。     

焦虑障碍、抑郁障碍患者的睡眠质量及与焦虑、抑郁症状的相关性

目的 探讨焦虑障碍、抑郁障碍患者的睡眠质量及与焦虑、抑郁症状的相关性.方法 选取2020年8月至2021年8月在深圳市康宁医院焦虑障碍科住院治疗的70例广泛性焦虑障碍、惊恐障碍、抑郁障碍患者,其中抑郁障碍组33例,焦虑障碍组37例.比较两组的汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)、汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)、匹兹堡睡眠质量指数...     

焦虑和抑郁障碍共病临床特征的对照研究

为了探讨焦虑和抑郁障碍共病 (ＣＡＤ)的性质 ,我们对ＣＡＤ的临床特征做了系统研究。对象　为 1 999年 1 1月至 2 0 0 0年 1 1月在南京脑科医院住院患者 ,75例。入组标准 :符合美国精神障碍诊断与统计手册第 4版 (ＤＳＭ ＩＶ)中主要抑郁症 (ｍａｊｏｒｄｅｐｒｅｓｓｉｏｎ ,ＭＤ)、广泛性焦虑障碍 (ｇｅｎｅｒａｌｉｚｅｄａｎｘｉｅｔｙｄｉｓｏｒｄｅｒ,ＧＡＤ)和惊恐障碍(ｐａｎｉｃｄｉｓｏｒｄｅｒ ,ＰＤ)的诊断标准 ;性别不限 ;年龄 1 8～ 65岁 ;经检查血常规正常 ,心、肝、肾功能正常 ;无精神分裂症、酒精和药物依赖病史 ,无脑器…     

伴抑郁症状的焦虑障碍患者生活质量的研究

目的 探讨伴有抑郁症状的焦虑障碍患者的生活质量.方法 纳入符合美国精神障碍诊断与统计手册第4版焦虑障碍诊断标准的患者163例和162名正常对照,患者按是否伴有抑郁症状分为单纯焦虑组以及焦虑-抑郁共存组,采用焦虑自评量表(SAS)、抑郁自评量表(SDS)、匹兹堡睡眠质量指数表(PSQI)和世界卫生组织生命质量测定量表简表(WHOQOL-BREF)等分别评定受试者的情绪症状、睡眠和生活质量,采用SPSS18.0对两组进行比较.结果 46.6%(76/163)的焦虑障碍患者伴有抑郁症状.焦虑-抑郁共存组的SAS标准分、PSQI总分均高于单纯焦虑组(P<0.01),WHOQOL-BREF总分及生理、心理、社会关系及环境领域得分分别为[ (47.92±8.52 )、(10.17±2.64)、(11.12±2.55)、(11.29±2.27)、(10.69±2.65)],而单纯焦虑组和健康对照组相应得分分别为[(57.88±9.43)、(13.02±2.61)、(13.08±2.29)、(13.44±2.41)、(12.47±2.63)和(65.14±9.42)、(14.99±2.41)、(11.12±2.55)、(11.29±2.27)、(10.69±2.65)],前者各得分均分别高于后两者(P均小于0.01).结论 焦虑障碍患者常伴发抑郁症状,伴有抑郁症状的焦虑障碍患者生活质量更低.     

文拉法辛合用小剂量舒必利治疗抑郁性神经症

目的：探讨文拉法辛合用小剂量舒必利治疗抑郁性神经症的疗效与不良反应。方法：将我院神经症科抑郁性神经症病例70例分为两组。研究组35例，使用文拉法辛合用小剂量舒必利治疗；对照组35例，单用文拉法辛治疗。疗程6周。采用汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)和副反应量表(TESS)评定疗效和不良反应。结果：两组疗效无明显差异。研究组恶心等不良反应明显为少。结论：文拉法辛合用小剂量舒必利治疗抑郁性神经症疗效好，不良反应减少，依从性更高。     

Correlations among insomnia symptoms, sleep medication use and depressive symptoms

Aim: To elucidate the factors associated with insomnia symptoms and the use of sleep medication, and the correlations among insomnia symptoms, sleep medication use and depressive symptoms in the general population. Methods: This survey was conducted in a rural community of Japan. Questionnaires consisted of basic information, the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, and a 12‐item version of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression scale, and were administered to all community members aged 20 years or over. A total of 2822 respondents with valid answers were subjected to analysis. Results: Occurrence of insomnia symptoms appeared to be associated with advancing age and existence of depressive symptoms. The extent of sleep medication use in the entire sample was 9%, and the value in the subjects with insomnia symptoms was 26%. Sleep medication use in insomniacs was associated with female sex and advancing age as well as higher scores in subcomponents of both poor subjective sleep quality and prolonged delay of sleep onset. Depressive symptoms were worst in the group with insomnia symptoms using sleep medication, and were significantly lower in the group without insomnia symptoms using sleep medication. Conclusions: Our study revealed that female sex, advancing age, depressive symptoms, poor sleep quality, and prolonged delay of sleep onset appeared as risk factors for sleep medication use. Insomnia symptoms were suspected to act as an exacerbating factor for depressive symptoms. However, our findings suggested that appropriate use of sleep medication could reduce depressive symptoms in the subjects with insomnia symptoms.     

Predictors of depressive symptoms at hospital discharge in patients with major depressive disorder

Abstract

Objective. Often patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) leave the hospital with continued significant symptomatology. This study sought to evaluate demographic, clinical, and psychosocial predictors of the presence of clinically significant depressive symptoms, defined as a Modified Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression score of ≥ 14, immediately following hospitalization for MDD. Methods. The study enrolled 135 patients with MDD as part of a larger clinical trial investigating the efficacy of post-hospitalization pharmacologic and psychosocial treatments for depressed inpatients. Structured clinical interview and self-report data were available from 126 patients at hospital admission and discharge. Results. Despite the significant decreases in depressive symptoms over the course of hospitalization, 91 (72%) displayed clinically significant depressive symptoms at discharge. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that female sex, earlier age of onset, and poorer social adjustment were unique predictors of symptom outcome. Conclusions. Results suggest that a large proportion of patients leave the hospital with continued significant symptomatology, and the presence of such symptoms following hospitalization for MDD is likely to be explained by a combination of factors.     

Extended release quetiapine fumarate as adjunct to antidepressant therapy in patients with major depressive disorder: pooled analyses of data in patients with anxious depression versus low levels of anxiety at baseline

Objectives. To evaluate quetiapine XR in patients with anxious depression, as defined by HAM-A total and HAM-D anxiety/somatisation factor scores. Methods. Post hoc analyses of pooled data from two 6-week, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled studies of adjunctive quetiapine XR (150 or 300 mg/day) in patients with MDD and inadequate response to antidepressants. Patients were stratified in a primary analysis using HAM-A (HAM-A total score at baseline ≥ 20 [“high”] or < 20 [“low”]) and a secondary analysis using HAM-D (anxious depression defined as HAM-D anxiety/somatisation factor score ≥ 7). Outcomes included change in MADRS total score. Results. In patients with high anxiety levels (HAM-A total score ≥ 20), reductions in MADRS total score were –15.20 (P = 0.122) and –15.92 (P < 0.05) for quetiapine XR 150 and 300 mg/day, respectively, vs. placebo (–13.49). In patients with low levels of anxiety (HAM-A total score < 20), both quetiapine XR doses (P < 0.001) improved MADRS total scores vs. placebo. In the secondary analysis, quetiapine XR 150 (P < 0.01) and 300 mg/day (P < 0.001) improved MADRS total score vs. placebo in patients with HAM-D anxiety/somatisation factor score ≥ 7. Conclusions. Adjunct quetiapine XR demonstrates efficacy in patients with anxious and non-anxious depression, assessed using HAM-A total score, and anxious depression assessed using HAM-D anxiety/somatisation factor score.     

影响重性抑郁障碍患者残留症状的因素分析

目的:探讨影响重性抑郁障碍患者残留症状相关因素。方法:根据汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)评分,将规范治疗后目前已不符合抑郁障碍诊断标准的门诊复诊的抑郁障碍患者分为残留症状组(HAMD 8~20分,40例)和无残留症状组(HAMD8分,40例);对两组患者的一般人口学资料、临床资料及HAMD、社会支持评定量表(SSRS)、生活事件量表(LES)、家庭功能评定(FAD)评分比较和分析。结果:与无残留症状组相比,残留症状组发病至开始治疗的时间以及病程长,住院次数多,经济状况和治疗依从性差,家族史阳性率高;SSRS和FAD总分低,LES评分、治疗前HAMD总分及其中认知障碍、迟缓、绝望感3个因子分高;以上各项比较差异有统计学意义(P均0.05)。结论:病程、及时治疗与否、治疗依从性、家族史、经济状况、社会和家庭支持、生活事件、治疗前病情可能是抑郁障碍患者残留症状的影响因素。     

Eszopiclone co-administered with fluoxetine in patients with insomnia coexisting with major depressive disorder.

BACKGROUND: Insomnia and major depressive disorder (MDD) can coexist. This study evaluated the effect of adding eszopiclone to fluoxetine. METHODS: Patients who met DSM-IV criteria for both MDD and insomnia (n = 545) received morning fluoxetine and were randomized to nightly eszopiclone 3 mg (ESZ+FLX) or placebo (PBO+FLX) for 8 weeks. Subjective sleep and daytime function were assessed weekly. Depression was assessed with the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D-17) and the Clinical Global Impression Improvement (CGI-I) and Severity items (CGI-S). RESULTS: Patients in the ESZ+FLX group had significantly decreased sleep latency, wake time after sleep onset (WASO), increased total sleep time (TST), sleep quality, and depth of sleep at all double-blind time points (all p < .05). Eszopiclone co-therapy also resulted in: significantly greater changes in HAM-D-17 scores at Week 4 (p = .01) with progressive improvement at Week 8 (p = .002); significantly improved CGI-I and CGI-S scores at all time points beyond Week 1 (p < .05); and significantly more responders (59% vs. 48%; p = .009) and remitters (42% vs. 33%; p = .03) at Week 8. Treatment was well tolerated, with similar adverse event and dropout rates. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, eszopiclone/fluoxetine co-therapy was relatively well tolerated and associated with rapid, substantial, and sustained sleep improvement, a faster onset of antidepressant response on the basis of CGI, and a greater magnitude of the antidepressant effect.     

Comparative study of suicide risk in depressive disorder patients with and without problem drinking

The present study sought to determine whether the co-occurrence of problem drinking heightens suicide risk in individuals with depression in Japan, using a sample of 784 outpatients (287 men and 497 women) with depressive disorder. Female subjects with at least a moderate problem drinking showed significantly more severe depression and suicidality than those without, but no such difference was identified in men.     

抑郁症患者焦虑/躯体化症状早期的变化与氟西汀疗效的相关性研究

目的探讨抑郁症患者焦虑／躯体化症状的早期变化对氟西汀抗抑郁治疗达症状缓解的预测作用。方法对103例重症抑郁患者给予氟西汀治疗6w,剂量固定于20 mg／d,于治疗前及治疗后的第1、2、4、6w末用汉密顿抑郁量表17项(HAMD-17)评定临床症状,其中焦虑／躯体化因子分用来评定焦虑／躯体化症状。结果治疗6w末103例患者中32例(31．1％)达到症状缓解标准,71例(68．9 ％)未达到症状缓解标准。早期HAMD-17中焦虑／躯体化因子分及胃肠道症状条目分的变化与症状缓解存在正相关,而该因子中其余条目的变化与症状缓解不相关。结论HAMD-17中焦虑／躯体化因子分及胃肠道症状有关的条目分早期改善可能是氟西汀治疗后症状能基本缓解的预测因子。