Planimetric and continuity equation assessment of aortic valve area: Head to head comparison between cardiac magnetic resonance and echocardiography

PURPOSE: To compare the accuracy of planimetric and continuity equation measurements of aortic valve area (AVA) by cardiac MR (cMR) to each other and against transthoracic (TTE) and transesophageal (TEE) echocardiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 31 patients (21 men, mean age = 67 +/- 13 years) with aortic stenosis (AS) and 16 controls (12 men, mean age = 57 +/- 14 years) underwent measurement of AVA by planimetric and continuity equation cMR. Measurements were compared to TEE planimetry and continuity equation TTE. RESULTS: AVA by continuity equation cMR correlated highly to continuity equation TTE (r = 0.98) and was not significantly different (1.8 +/- 1.3 cm2 vs. 1.8 +/- 1.4 cm2, P = 0.62). Similarly, AVA by cMR planimetry was not statistically different from TEE planimetry (2.1 +/- 1.7 cm2 vs. 2.1 +/- 1.6 cm2, P = 0.34) and correlated highly (r = 0.98). Yet planimetric measurements of AVA by cMR and TEE were significantly higher than AVA by continuity equation cMR (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively) and TTE (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: Both planimetry and continuity equation-based measurements of AVA by cMR are equally accurate. However, similar to TEE, cMR AVA is larger by planimetry than by continuity equation. This is consistent with the contention that the anatomical maximum opening of a stenotic aortic valve is larger than the size of the functional vena contracta.     

Absolute assessment of aortic valve stenosis by planimetry using cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with transesophageal echocardiography, transthoracic echocardiography, and cardiac catheterisation

OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to investigate absolute assessment of aortic valve area (AVA), before surgery for aortic stenosis, using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in comparison with transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and with effective AVA indirectly obtained by routine techniques i.e. transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and cardiac catheterisation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Absolute AVA planimetry was performed by TEE and CMR steady state free precession sequences obtained through the aortic valvular plane. Effective AVA was calculated by the continuity equation in TTE and by cardiac catheterisation (Gorlin formula). RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients with aortic valve stenosis, mean age 71.7 +/- 7.6 years, with a mean AVA of 0.93 +/- 0.31 cm2 as measured by TEE, were enrolled in the study. Mean differences were: between CMR and TEE planimetry: d = 0.01 +/- 0.14 cm2, between CMR and cardiac catheterisation: d = 0.05 +/- 0.13 cm2, between CMR and TTE: d = 0.10 +/- 0.17 cm2, between TTE and TEE: d = 0.10 +/- 0.18 cm2, between TTE and cardiac catheterisation: d = 0.06 +/- 0.16 cm2, and between TEE and cardiac catheterisation: d = 0.07 +/- 0.13 cm2. Mean intraobserver and interobserver differences of CMR planimetry were d = 0.02 +/- 0.07 cm2 and d = 0.03 +/- 0.14 cm2, respectively. CONCLUSION: CMR planimetry of the AVA is a noninvasive and reproducible technique to evaluate stenotic aortic valves and can be used as an alternative to echocardiography or cardiac catheterisation.     

Aortic stenosis: comparative evaluation of 16-detector row CT and echocardiography

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate whether planimetric measurements of aortic valve area (AVA) with 16-detector row computed tomography (CT) allow classification of aortic stenosis (AS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study had institutional review board approval; patients gave informed consent. Twenty patients (11 men, nine women; mean age, 63 years) with AS and 20 patients (10 men, 10 women; mean age, 65 years) without underwent transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), and retrospectively electrocardiographically gated 16-detector row CT. Twenty CT data sets were reconstructed in 5% steps of R-R interval; data analysis was performed with four-dimensional software. Maximum AVA in systole planimetrically measured with CT (AVA(CT)) was compared with AVA planimetrically measured with TEE (AVA(TEE)), AVA calculated with the continuity equation and TTE (AVA(TTE)), and transvalvular pressure gradients determined with the Bernoulli equation and TTE. Correlations among AVA(CT), AVA(TTE), AVA(TEE), and transvalvular pressure gradients were tested with bivariate regression analysis; agreement between methods was assessed with the Bland-Altman method. RESULTS: In patients without AS, mean AVA(CT) was 3.56 cm2 +/- 0.66 and mean AVA(TEE) was 3.43 cm2 +/- 0.69. In patients with AS, mean AVA(CT) was 0.89 cm2 +/- 0.35; mean AVA(TEE), 0.86 cm2 +/- 0.35; and mean AVA(TTE), 0.83 cm2 +/- 0.33. Mean transvalvular pressure gradient was 51 mm Hg +/- 22. Significant correlations were present between AVA(CT) and AVA(TEE) (r = 0.99, P < .001), AVA(CT) and AVA(TTE) (r = 0.95, P < .001), and AVA(CT) and transvalvular pressure gradients (r = -0.74, P < .01). Mean differences were -0.08 cm2 (limits of agreement: -0.32, 0.16) for AVA(CT) versus AVA(TEE) and 0.06 cm2 (limits of agreement: -0.15, 0.26) for AVA(CT) versus AVA(TTE). CONCLUSION: Planimetric measurements of AVA with retrospectively electrocardiographically gated 16-detector row CT allow classification of AS that is similar to that achieved with measurements by using echocardiographic methods.     

Effect of the ellipsoid shape of the left ventricular outflow tract on the echocardiographic assessment of aortic valve area in aortic stenosis

BackgroundPrevious studies showed discrepancies between echocardiographic and multidector row CT (MDCT) measurements of aortic valve area (AVA).ObjectiveOur aim was to evaluate the effect of the ellipsoid shape of the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT), as shown and measured by MDCT, on the assessment of AVA by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) in patients with severe aortic stenosis.MethodsThis retrospective single-center study involved 49 patients with severe aortic stenosis referred before transcatheter aortic valve implantation. The AVA was deduced from the continuity equation on TTE and from planimetry on cardiac MDCT. Area of the LVOT was calculated as follows: on TTE, from the measurement of LVOT diameter on parasternal long-axis view; on MDCT, from manual planimetry by using multiplanar reconstruction perpendicular to LVOT.ResultsAt baseline, correlation of TTE vs MDCT AVA measurements was moderate (R = 0.622; P < .001). TTE underestimated AVA compared with MDCT (0.66 ± 0.15 cm² vs 0.87 ± 0.15 cm²; P < .001). After correcting the continuity equation with the LVOT area as measured by MDCT, mean AVA drawn from TTE did not differ from MDCT (0.86 ± 0.2 cm²) and correlation between TTE and MDCT measurements increased (R = 0.704; P < .001).ConclusionAssuming that LVOT area is circular with TTE results in constant underestimation of the AVA with the continuity equation compared with MDCT planimetry. The elliptical not circular shape of LVOT largely explains these discrepancies.     

Grading of aortic stenosis severity: a head-to-head comparison between cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and echocardiography

Aim

To prospectively evaluate the accuracy of cardiac magnetic resonance (cMR) imaging for the assessment of aortic valve effective orifice area (EOA) by continuity equation and anatomical aortic valve area (AVA) by direct planimetry, as compared with transthoracic (TTE) and transesophageal (TEE) two-dimensional (2D) echocardiography, respectively.

Methods and results

A total of 31 patients (21 men, 10 women, mean age 69?±?10 years) with moderate-to-severe aortic stenosis (AS) diagnosed by TTE and scheduled for elective aortic valve replacement, underwent both cMR and TEE. AVA by cMR was obtained from balanced steady-state free-precession cine-images. EOA was computed from phase-contrast MR flow analysis. AVA at cMR (0.93?±?0.42 cm²) was highly correlated with TEE-derived planimetry (0.92?±?0.32 cm²) (concordance correlation coefficient, CCC?=?0.85). By excluding 11 patients with extensively thickened and heavily calcified cusps, the CCC increased to 0.93. EOA at cMR (0.86?±?0.30 cm²) showed a strong correlation with TTE-derived EOA (0.78?±?0.25 cm²) (CCC?=?0.82).

Conclusions

cMR imaging is an accurate alternative for the grading of AS severity. Its use may be recommended especially in patients with poor transthoracic acoustic windows and/or in case of discordance between 2D echocardiographic parameters.

     

Planimetry of aortic valve area in aortic stenosis by magnetic resonance imaging

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to determine whether noninvasive planimetry of aortic valve area (AVA) by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is feasible and reliable in patients with valvular aortic stenosis in comparison to transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and catheterization. METHODS AND RESULTS: Planimetry of AVA by MRI (MRI-AVA) was performed on a clinical magnetic resonance system (1.5-T Sonata, Siemens Medical Solutions) in 33 patients and compared with AVA calculated invasively by the Gorlin-formula at catheterization (CATH-AVA, n = 33) as well as to AVA planimetry by multiplane TEE (TEE-AVA, n = 27). Determination of MRI-AVA was possible with an adequate image quality in 82% (27/33), whereas image quality of TEE-AVA was adequate only in 56% (15/27) of patients because of calcification artifacts (P = 0.05). The correlation between MRI-AVA and CATH-AVA was 0.80 (P < 0.0001) and the correlation of MRI-AVA and TEE-AVA was 0.86 (P < 0.0001). MRI-AVA overestimated TEE-AVA by 15% (0.98 +/- 0.31 cm2 vs. 0.85 +/- 0.3 cm2, P < 0.001) and CATH-AVA by 27% (0.94 +/- 0.29 cm2 vs. 0.74 +/- 0.24 cm2, P < 0.0001). Nevertheless, a MRI-AVA below 1,3 cm2 indicated severe aortic stenosis (CATH-AVA < 1 cm2) with a sensitivity of 96% and a specificity of 100% (ROC area 0.98). CONCLUSIONS: Planimetry of aortic valve area by MRI can be performed with better image quality as compared with TEE. In the clinical management of patients with aortic stenosis, it has to be considered that MRI slightly overestimates aortic valve area as compared with catheterization despite an excellent correlation.     

A New Method for Aortic Valve Planimetry with High-Resolution 3-Dimensional MRI and Its Comparison with Conventional Cine MRI and Echocardiography for Assessing the Severity of Aortic Valvular Stenosis

ObjectiveWe aimed to compare the aortic valve area (AVA) calculated using fast high-resolution three-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance (MR) image acquisition with that of the conventional two-dimensional (2D) cine MR technique.Materials and MethodsWe included 139 consecutive patients (mean age ± standard deviation [SD], 68.5 ± 9.4 years) with aortic valvular stenosis (AS) and 21 asymptomatic controls (52.3 ± 14.2 years). High-resolution T2-prepared 3D steady-state free precession (SSFP) images (2.0 mm slice thickness, 10 contiguous slices) for 3D planimetry (3DP) were acquired with a single breath hold during mid-systole. 2D SSFP cine MR images (6.0 mm slice thickness) for 2D planimetry (2DP) were also obtained at three aortic valve levels. The calculations for the effective AVA based on the MR images were compared with the transthoracic echocardiographic (TTE) measurements using the continuity equation.ResultsThe mean AVA ± SD derived by 3DP, 2DP, and TTE in the AS group were 0.81 ± 0.26 cm², 0.82 ± 0.34 cm², and 0.80 ± 0.26 cm², respectively (p = 0.366). The intra-observer agreement was higher for 3DP than 2DP in one observer: intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.95 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.94–0.97) and 0.87 (95% CI, 0.82–0.91), respectively, for observer 1 and 0.97 (95% CI, 0.96–0.98) and 0.98 (95% CI, 0.97–0.99), respectively, for observer 2. Inter-observer agreement was similar between 3DP and 2DP, with the ICC of 0.92 (95% CI, 0.89–0.94) and 0.91 (95% CI, 0.88–0.93), respectively. 3DP-derived AVA showed a slightly higher agreement with AVA measured by TTE than the 2DP-derived AVA, with the ICC of 0.87 (95% CI, 0.82–0.91) vs. 0.85 (95% CI, 0.79–0.89).ConclusionHigh-resolution 3D MR image acquisition, with single-breath-hold SSFP sequences, gave AVA measurement with low observer variability that correlated highly with those obtained by TTE.     

Aortic regurgitation: assessment with 64-section CT

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate diagnostic accuracy of 64-section computed tomography (CT) for evaluation of aortic regurgitation (AR), with transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) as reference. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The institutional review board approved this study; written informed consent was obtained. Thirty patients (23 men, seven women; mean age, 56.6 years) with AR underwent TTE and retrospective electrocardiographically gated 64-section CT. CT data sets were reconstructed in 5% steps from 40% to 90% of R-R interval for analysis. Maximum regurgitant orifice area (ROA) in diastole was planimetrically measured with CT, and measurements were compared with semiquantitative classification with TTE (Spearman rank order correlation coefficients). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated for differentiation between degrees of AR with ROA measurements. Dimensions of the aortic root and left ventricular parameters were compared (Pearson correlation analysis). RESULTS: A significant correlation was observed between CT planimetric size of ROA (mean, 62 mm2+/-63 [standard deviation]; range, 6-224 mm2) and TTE classification of mild, moderate, and severe AR (r=0.84, P<.001). With ROC analysis, discrimination between degrees of AR with CT was highly accurate when cutoff ROAs (25 mm2 and 75 mm2) were used. A significant correlation was observed between methods in dimensions of aortic annulus (mean, 29.0 mm+/-4.6), sinus of Valsalva (mean, 38.3 mm+/-8.6), and ascending aorta (mean, 37.2 mm+/-8.0); mean values were 27.4 mm+/-4.9 (r=0.76, P<.001), 37.7 mm+/-8.6 (r=0.94, P<.001), and 38.2 mm+/-7.9 (r=0.96, P<.001), respectively. Mean end-systolic volume (67 mL+/-38), end-diastolic volume (149 mL+/-48), and ejection fraction (57%+/-13) at CT correlated well with mean results at TTE (65 mL+/-36 [r=0.96, P<.001], 140 mL+/-48 [r=0.91, P<.001], 56%+/-13 [r=0.98, P<.001], respectively). CONCLUSION: Results of assessment of AR with 64-section CT are similar to those with TTE.     

Quantification of aortic valve area at 256-slice computed tomography: Comparison with transesophageal echocardiography and cardiac catheterization in subjects with high-grade aortic valve stenosis prior to percutaneous valve replacement

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to compare planimetric aortic valve area (AVA) measurements from 256-slice CT to those derived from transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and cardiac catheterization in high-risk subjects with known high-grade calcified aortic stenosis.

Methods and materials

The study included 26 subjects (10 males, mean age: 79 ± 6; range, 61–88 years). All subjects were clinically referred for aortic valve imaging prior to percutaneous aortic valve replacement from April 2008 to March 2009. Two radiologists, blinded to the results of TEE and cardiac catheterization, independently selected the systolic cardiac phase of maximum aortic valve area and independently performed manual CT AVA planimetry for all subjects. Repeated AVA measurements were made to establish CT intra- and interobserver repeatability. In addition, the image quality of the aortic valve was rated by both observers. Aortic valve calcification was also quantified.

Results

All 26 subjects had a high-grade aortic valve stenosis (systolic opening area <1.0 cm²) via CT-based planimetry, with a mean AVA of 0.62 ± 0.18. In four subjects, TEE planimetry was precluded due to severe aortic valve calcification, but CT-planimetry was successfully performed with a mean AVA of 0.46 ± 0.23 cm². Mean aortic valve calcium mass score was 563.8 ± 526.2 mg. Aortic valve area by CT was not correlated with aortic valve calcium mass score. A bias and limits of agreement among CT and TEE, CT and cardiac catheterization, and TEE and cardiac catheterization were −0.07 [–0.37 to 0.24], 0.03 [−0.49 to 0.55], 0.12 [−0.39 to 0.63] cm², respectively. Differences in AVA among CT and TEE or cardiac catheterization did not differ systematically over the range of measurements and were not correlated with aortic valve calcium mass score.

Conclusion

Planimetric aortic valve area measurements from 256-slice CT agree well with those derived from TEE and cardiac catheterization in high-risk subjects with known high-grade calcified aortic stenosis.     

Atrial septal defects in pediatric patients: noninvasive sizing with cardiovascular MR imaging

PURPOSE: To evaluate phase-contrast magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for sizing of secundum atrial septal defects (ASDs) and inflow MR angiography for detection of associated venous anomalies in pediatric patients with inconclusive transthoracic echocardiographic (TTE) results. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-five children (mean age, 5.4 years +/- 2.7 [SD]) with ASD and inconclusive TTE results underwent phase-contrast MR imaging. Defect size and rim distances measured on MR imaging sections obtained in the ASD plane and from the defect to the venae cavae, aortic root, and atrioventricular valves were compared with transesophageal echocardiographic (TEE) findings (n = 30) during transcatheter closure or surgical measurements (n = 40) by using Bland-Altman analysis. Inflow MR angiography was compared with invasive cine angiocardiography for detection of associated venous anomalies. RESULTS: For ASD size, mean differences were less than 1 mm between MR imaging and TEE measurements (with upper and lower limits of agreement between 2.3 and -3.3 mm) and were between 1.2 and -1.6 mm between MR imaging and surgical measurements (with upper and lower limits of agreement between 4.7 and -5.2 mm). Septal rim measurements at MR imaging agreed fairly well with TEE and surgical results. Septal length was overestimated at MR imaging versus TEE (mean difference, 3.0 mm; upper and lower limits of agreement, between 8.0 and -2.8 mm), but MR imaging septal length measurements agreed with surgical results. Rim distance to coronary sinus was difficult to assess. MR imaging enabled referral of 25 of 30 patients for successful transcatheter closure; five patients were found to have too large defects after balloon sizing. Multiple ASDs and/or associated vascular anomalies in 17 of 65 patients were clearly identified at MR imaging, compared with results of TEE, surgery, and cardiac catheterization. CONCLUSION: In children with ASD and inconclusive TTE results, MR imaging can enable determination of defect size, rim distances to adjacent structures, and venous connections.     

Planimetry of the aortic valve orifice area: Comparison of multislice spiral computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging

Objective

We sought to determine the comparability of multislice computed tomography (MSCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for measuring the aortic valve orifice area (AVA) and grading aortic valve stenosis.

Materials and methods

Twenty-seven individuals, among them 18 patients with valvular stenosis, underwent AVA planimetry by both MSCT and MRI. In the subset of patients with valvular stenosis, AVA was also calculated from transthoracic Doppler echocardiography (TTE) using the continuity equation.

Results

There was excellent correlation between MSCT and MRI (r = 0.99) and limits of agreement were in an acceptable range (±0.42 cm²) although MSCT yielded a slightly smaller mean AVA than MRI (1.57 ± 0.83 cm² vs. 1.67 ± 0.98 cm², p < 0.05). However, in the subset of patients with valvular stenosis, the mean AVA was not different between MSCT and MRI (1.05 ± 0.30 cm² vs. 1.04 ± 0.39 cm²; p > 0.05). The mean AVAs on both MSCT and MRI were systematically larger than on TTE (0.88 ± 0.28 cm², p < 0.001 each). Using an AVA of 1.0 cm² on TTE as reference, the best threshold for detecting severe-to-critical stenosis on MSCT and MRI was an AVA of 1.25 cm² and 1.30 cm², respectively, resulting in an accuracy of 96% each.

Conclusion

Our study specifies recent reports on the suitability of MSCT for quantifying AVA. The data presented here suggest that certain methodical discrepancies of AVA measurements exist between MSCT, MRI and TTE. However, MSCT and MRI have shown excellent correlation in AVA planimetry and similar accuracy in grading aortic valve stenosis.     

64-slice multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) for detection of aortic regurgitation and quantification of severity

BACKGROUND: Recent advances in 64-slice multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) provide an opportunity to assess coronary artery disease, left ventricular function and, potentially, valvular heart disease. OBJECTIVE: To determine the ability of 64-MDCT to both detect and to quantify the severity of aortic regurgitation (AR), as compared with transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). METHODS: We evaluated a total of 64 patients (43 males, mean age 63+/-11 years), 30 with varying severities of AR as assessed by TTE and 34 matched controls. The severity of AR by TTE was determined using the vena contracta, the ratio of jet to left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) height, and the ratio of the jet to LVOT cross-sectional area. AR by MDCT was defined as a lack of coaptation of the aortic valve leaflets in diastole and, if detected, the maximum anatomic aortic regurgitant orifice was determined. RESULTS: All 34 control patients without AR were correctly identified by MDCT. There were 14 patients with mild AR, 10 with moderate AR, and 6 with severe AR by TTE. Of these patients, MDCT correctly identified 21 patients with AR (sensitivity 70%, specificity 100%, positive predictive value [PPV] 100%, and negative predictive value [NPV] 79%). Anatomic regurgitant orifice area measured by MDCT correlated well with the TTE-derived vena contracta (r=0.79, P<0.001), ratio of jet to LVOT height (r=0.79, P<0.001), and ratio of jet to LVOT cross-sectional area (r=0.75, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Direct planimetric measurement of the aortic valve anatomic regurgitant orifice area on 64-MDCT provides an accurate, noninvasive technique for detecting and quantifying AR.     

Comparison of cine MR imaging with Doppler echocardiography for the evaluation of aortic regurgitation

Regurgitant blood flow is associated with localized signal loss of the blood pool within the recipient chamber on cine MR images, which may be useful for assessing regurgitant valvular disease. To evaluate the potential of this technique for determining the severity of aortic regurgitation, multilevel cine MR imaging was performed in 10 normal volunteers and in 25 patients with aortic regurgitation documented and graded for severity by Doppler echocardiography. Cine MR images were analyzed to obtain cardiac chamber volumes and to measure the extent of the signal loss associated with regurgitation. All regurgitant lesions were visualized on cine MR images as areas of diastolic signal loss extending from the aortic valve into the left ventricle. The extent of signal loss and the regurgitant volume determined from analysis of MR images correlated with the echocardiographic severity of the lesion. The total area of diastolic left ventricular signal loss was 0 cm2 in 10 normal volunteers, 24 +/- 13 (+/- SD) cm2 in eight patients with mild aortic regurgitation, 49 +/- 11 cm2 in nine patients with moderate aortic regurgitation, and 62 +/- 20 cm2 in eight patients with severe aortic regurgitation (p less than .05 for moderate and severe vs mild). Left ventricular volumes calculated from MR images correlated well with echocardiographic volumes (r = .92, SEE = 30 ml, p less than .0001). Regurgitant fraction calculated from analysis of cine MR images was 4 +/- 7% in normal volunteers and 31 +/- 8% in mild, 45 +/- 11% in moderate, and 56 +/- 9% in severe aortic regurgitation (p less than .05 for moderate and severe vs mild and normal). Thus, cine MR imaging can provide useful qualitative and quantitative data regarding cardiac dimensions and regurgitant valvular flow in patients with aortic regurgitation.     

Aortic annulus and ascending aorta: Comparison of preoperative and periooperative measurement in patients with aortic stenosis

Background

Precise determination of the aortic annulus size constitutes an integral part of the preoperative evaluation prior to aortic valve replacement. It enables the estimation of the size of prosthesis to be implanted. Knowledge of the size of the ascending aorta is required in the preoperative analysis and monitoring of its dilation enables the precise timing of the operation. Our goal was to compare the precision of measurement of the aortic annulus and ascending aorta using magnetic resonance (MR), multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT), transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), and transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in patients with degenerative aortic stenosis.

Methods and results

A total of 15 patients scheduled to have aortic valve replacement were enrolled into this prospective study. TTE was performed in all patients and was supplemented with TEE, CT and MR in the majority of patients. The values obtained were compared with perioperative measurements. For the measurement of aortic annulus, MR was found to be the most precise technique, followed by MDCT, TTE, and TEE. For the measurement of ascending aorta, MR again was found to be the most precise technique, followed by MDCT, TEE, and TTE.

Conclusion

In our study, magnetic resonance was found to be the most precise technique for the measurement of aortic annulus and ascending aorta in patients with severe degenerative aortic stenosis.     

Occult scaphoid fractures: comparison of multidetector CT and MR imaging--initial experience

PURPOSE: To compare the diagnostic performance of multidetector computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in patients clinically suspected of having a scaphoid fracture and who had normal initial radiographs, with radiographs obtained 6 weeks after trauma as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The ethics committee approved the study, and all patients gave written informed consent. Twenty-nine patients (17 male, 12 female; age range, 17-62 years; mean age, 34 years +/- 13) underwent multidetector CT and MR imaging within 6 days after trauma. CT data were obtained with 0.5-mm collimation. For image review, 0.7-mm-thick multiplanar reformations were performed in transverse, coronal, and sagittal planes relative to the wrist. The 1.0-T MR examination consisted of coronal and transverse short inversion time inversion-recovery, coronal and transverse T1-weighted spin-echo, and coronal volume-rendered T2-weighted gradient-echo sequences. Two radiologists analyzed the CT and MR images. A binomial test was used to evaluate the significance of the differences between MR imaging and CT in detection of scaphoid fractures and cortical involvement (P < .05). RESULTS: The 6-week follow-up radiographs depicted a scaphoid fracture in 11 (38%) patients. Eight patients had a cortical fracture, while three patients had only a bandlike lucency within the trabecular portion of the scaphoid. MR imaging depicted all 11 fractures but only three [corrected] cortical fractures. Multidetector CT depicted all eight cortical fractures but failed to depict trabecular fractures. No false-positive fractures were seen on MR or CT images. Differences between MR imaging and CT were not significant for the detection of scaphoid fractures (P = .25) but were significant for cortical involvement (P = .03). CONCLUSION: Multidetector CT is highly accurate in depicting occult cortical scaphoid fractures but appears inferior to MR imaging in depicting solely trabecular injury. MR imaging is inferior to multidetector CT in depicting cortical involvement.     

MR measurement of blood flow in the true and false channel in chronic aortic dissection

Velocity encoded (VEC) cine MR imaging is a new noninvasive technique for the quantification of blood flow velocity in the cardiovascular system. Six patients with type B aortic dissection underwent VEC cine MR imaging at 1.5 T. This technique provides cine MR magnitude and VEC phase images at approximately 16 equally spaced intervals during an average cardiac cycle. A region of interest encompassing a vascular structure, i.e., false channel, provides a spatially averaged velocity for the time interval at which the image was acquired. Interpretation of velocity values from the 16 intervals during the cardiac cycle provides a temporally average velocity. Velocity mapping across the aortic lumen in these six cases showed average spatial and temporal velocity of 13.4 +/- 1.49 cm/s in the true channel and 3.1 +/- 0.84 cm/s in the false channel (p less than 0.05). The peak systolic velocity (temporal peak) was 43.6 +/- 7.20 cm/s in the true channel and 14.3 +/- 2.30 cm/s in the false channel (p less than 0.05). The flow volume per cardiac cycle was not significantly different between the ture (23.1 +/- 5.04 ml/cycle) and false channel (27.1 +/- 10.14 ml/cycle). There was substantial retrograde flow in the false channel of two patients. The intraobserver and interobserver variability was less than 10% (r = 0.98 to 0.99) for the measurement of flow parameters in both the true and the false channel. We conclude that VEC cine MR imaging demonstrates substantial differences in the hemodynamic pattern in the true and false channel in aortic dissection.     

Quantification of aortic valve stenosis in MRI—comparison of steady-state free precession and fast low-angle shot sequences

We compared two different magnetic resonance (MR) sequences [steady-state free precession (SSFP) and gradient echo fast low-angle shot (FLASH)] for the assessment of aortic valve areas in aortic stenosis using transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) as the standard of reference. Thirty-two patients with known aortic stenosis underwent MR (1.5 T) using a cine SSFP sequence and a cine FLASH sequence. Planimetry was performed in cross-sectional images and compared to the results of the TEE. In seven patients the grade of stenosis was additionally assessed by invasive cardiac catheterization (ICC). The mean aortic valve area measured by TEE was 0.97±0.19 mm², 1.00±0.25 mm² for SSFP and 1.25±0.23 mm² based on FLASH images. The mean difference between the valve areas assessed based on SSFP and TEE images was 0.15±0.13 cm² (FLASH vs TEE: 0.29±0.17 cm²). Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated that measurements using FLASH images overestimated the aortic valve area compared to TEE. Comparing ICC with MRI and TEE, only a weak to moderate correlation was found (ICC vs TEE: R=0.52, p=0.22; ICC vs SSFP: R=0.20, p=0.65; ICC vs FLASH: R=0.16, p=0.70). Measurements of the aortic valve area based on SSFP images correlate better with TEE compared to FLASH images.     

Myocardial viability: assessment with three-dimensional MR imaging in pigs and patients

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate the correlation between a three-dimensional (3D) delayed enhancement magnetic resonance (MR) imaging sequence and a two-dimensional (2D) delayed enhancement MR imaging sequence for noninvasive assessment of myocardial viability in pigs and patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The pig and patient studies were approved by the responsible authorities, and patients gave written informed consent. MR imaging was performed by using a rapid 3D inversion-recovery balanced steady-state free precession sequence and a 2D segmented inversion-recovery fast low-angle shot sequence as the reference standard. Fourteen pigs with reperfused (n=7) or nonreperfused (n=7) myocardial infarction and 17 patients (13 men, four women; mean age, 64.9 years+/-8.6 [standard deviation]) suspected of having myocardial infarction were included. Linear regression analysis and Bland-Altman analysis were used to compare the infarction volumes. RESULTS: In 10 of the 14 pigs the induction of myocardial infarction was successful. In these pigs, altogether 81 segments with myocardial infarction were demonstrated by both MR sequences, and agreement between the two sequences for classification of transmural extent of myocardial infarction was 99.7%. The infarction volume determined by using 3D MR imaging (4.64 cm3+/-2.48) in the pigs highly correlated with that of 2D MR imaging (4.65 cm3+/-2.39, r=0.989, P<.001) and that of staining by using triphenyltetrazolium chloride (4.67 cm3+/-2.44, r=0.996, P<.001). Thirteen of the 17 patients examined showed myocardial infarction in 34 myocardial segments with both sequences, and agreement between the two sequences for classification of transmural extent of myocardial infarction was 98.6%. In the patients, the infarction volume determined with both sequences highly correlated (9.71 cm3+/-7.47 for the 3D sequence vs 10.01 cm3+/-8.04 for the 2D sequence, r=0.982, P<.001). The breath-hold time necessary for the 3D MR imaging (21.0+/-2.3 seconds) was significantly shorter than that for 2D MR imaging (188.3+/-20.2 seconds, P<.001). CONCLUSION: Myocardial infarction volumes obtained with the 3D MR imaging sequence are highly correlated and in good agreement with volumes obtained with the 2D MR imaging standard approach and reduced the acquisition time by a factor of nine.     

Multi-detector row CT of left ventricular function with dedicated analysis software versus MR imaging: initial experience

PURPOSE: To determine left ventricular (LV) volumetric and functional parameters from retrospectively electrocardiographically gated multi-detector row computed tomography (CT) by using semiautomated analysis software and to correlate results with those of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 30 patients (mean age, 59.2 years +/- 7.1 [SD]) known to have or suspected of having coronary artery disease, four-channel multi-detector row CT was performed with standard technique, and diastolic and systolic image reconstructions were generated. With commercially available analysis software capable of semiautomated contour detection, end diastolic and end systolic LV volumes were determined from short-axis secondary CT reformations. Steady-state free-precession cine MR images were acquired in short-axis orientation within 48 hours and analyzed by using dedicated software. Bland-Altman analysis was performed to calculate limits of agreement and systematic errors between CT and MR imaging. RESULTS: Mean end diastolic (138.8 mL +/- 31.9) and end systolic (53.9 mL +/- 21.2) LV volumes as determined with CT correlated well with MR imaging measurements (142.0 mL +/- 32.5 [r = 0.93] and 54.9 mL +/- 22.8 [r = 0.94], respectively [P <.001]). LV ejection fraction (61.6% +/- 10.6 for CT vs 62.3% +/- 10.1 for MR imaging; r = 0.89) and stroke volume (84.6 mL +/- 20.9 for CT vs 86.9 mL +/- 21.5 for MR imaging; r = 0.88) also showed good correlation (P <.001). Bland-Altman analysis showed acceptable limits of agreement (+/-9.8% for ejection fraction) without systematic errors. CONCLUSION: In selected patients, semiautomated analysis software enables LV volumetric and functional analysis based on multi-detector row CT data sets, the results of which correlate well with MR imaging findings.     

Prediction of left ventricular remodeling and analysis of infarct resorption in patients with reperfused myocardial infarcts by using contrast-enhanced MR imaging

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate the accuracy of clinical and cardiac magnetic resonance (MR) imaging parameters for predicting left ventricular (LV) remodeling by using follow-up imaging as reference standard, and to prospectively evaluate infarct resorption in patients with reperfused first myocardial infarcts. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was approved by the institutional ethics committee and all patients gave written informed consent. In 55 patients (48 men, seven women; mean age+/-standard deviation, 56 years+/-13), contrast material-enhanced and cine MR imaging were performed 5 days+/-3 and 8 months+/-3 after myocardial infarction (MI). Microvascular obstruction (MO) and infarct size were estimated at first-pass enhancement (FPE) and delayed enhancement (DE) MR, respectively. Remodeling was defined as an increase in LV end-diastolic volume index of 20% or higher at follow-up. Differences in continuous and categorical data were analyzed by using Student t test and Fischer exact test as appropriate. RESULTS: Patients with remodeling (n=13, 24%) had higher creatine kinase MB (P<.05), more anterior infarcts (P<.05), more often a reduced Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction flow (P<.05), larger infarct size at DE MR (P<.001), a greater extent of MO at FPE MR (P<.01), lower ejection fraction (P<.001) and higher LV end-systolic volume index (P<.01). Infarct size at DE MR was a powerful predictor for remodeling (odds ratio: 1.18, P<.001), demonstrating that the risk for remodeling increased 2.8-fold with each 10% increase in infarct size. Infarct size of 24% or more of LV area predicted remodeling with high sensitivity (92%), specificity (93%), and accuracy (93%). Infarct resorption was larger in patients with remodeling (P<.01). CONCLUSION: Infarct size 24% or more of the LV area constitutes an important threshold to predict remodeling. Patients with remodeling develop disproportionate infarct resorption.