Flow cytometric DNA analysis of fresh prostatic resections: Correlation with conventional prognostic parameters in patients with prostate cancer

Background. DNA ploidy analysis has been investigated as a prognostic indicator in prostate cancer. Most of the data is derived from retrospective studies using paraffin-embedded tissue. This method has drawbacks related to the quality of DNA histograms and uncontrolled data collection. Methods. DNA ploidy analysis of freshly resected prostatic tissue was prospectively compared with conventional prognostic variables in 97 men treated with radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer. Results. Regarding the patients, 31.9% were African American and 66% had pathologic Stages C or D1 disease. Only 9.6% of patients with Stages A2 and B had a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value greater than 10 ng/ml, whereas 97% of patients with PSA values greater than 20 ng/ml had pathologic Stages C and D1. PSA levels correlated with Gleason score (P = < 0.05); 51% and 100% of patients with Gleason score 5–7 and 8–10, respectively, had PSA values greater than 10 ng/ml. Twenty-two patients (23%) had DNA aneuploid tumors. Comparisons of mechanical to enzymatic cell suspensions indicated that DNA aneuploidy was better preserved in mechanical cell preparations. DNA ploidy correlated with pathologic stage (P = < 0.05) and Gleason score (P = < 0.05). Fifteen of 79 patients (18.9%) with Gleason score 5–7 had DNA aneuploid tumors versus 71.4% of patients with Gleason score 8–10. PSA groups correlated with ploidy status (P = 0.01). Although the majority of patients (19 of 22) with DNA aneuploid tumors had elevated preoperative PSA levels, none had a PSA value greater than 50 ng/ml. Conclusions. DNA ploidy analysis correlated with established prognostic indicators in prostate cancer; however, its independent correlation with natural history and treatment outcome must be established for it to have an effect on therapeutic decisions.     

Relationship between DNA ploidy, glandular differentiation, and tumor spread in human prostate cancer

DNA ploidy was evaluated by flow cytometry for 45 human prostate carcinomas (34 prostatectomy specimens and 11 biopsies). Twenty tumors (44.4%) contained a distinct aneuploid stem line. All 11 tumors confined to the prostate gland (pathological Stage B) were diploid. The frequency of aneuploidy increased with advancing stage, and most tumors with distant metastases were aneuploid. The degree of glandular differentiation was characterized by the Gleason score. One-third of tumors with a Gleason score of 5 to 6 were aneuploid, whereas over 70% of poorly differentiated tumors with a Gleason score of 9 to 10 were aneuploid. Among diploid tumors, 45.5% were localized carcinomas (Stage B), 36.4% were characterized by invasion outside the prostate (Stage C), and 18.2% formed pelvic nodal or distant metastases (Stages D1 and D2). In nearly two-thirds of patients with aneuploid tumors, pelvic nodal or distant metastases were found. When tumors were classified according to both DNA ploidy and degree of glandular differentiation, then subgroups of tumors with the highest and lowest degree of malignant potential became apparent. Only 7.1% of diploid tumors with a Gleason score of 5 to 6 formed metastases, but 80% of aneuploid tumors with a higher Gleason score (7 to 10) formed metastases. Diploid tumors with higher Gleason scores and aneuploid tumors with lower Gleason scores had intermediate frequencies of metastases. The presence of an aneuploid stem line in prostate carcinomas indicated that the tumor had spread outside the prostate gland or had metastasized. DNA ploidy may be an important prognostic factor for human prostate cancer. DNA ploidy and the degree of glandular differentiation considered together may improve prognostic evaluation of prostate carcinomas.     

Ten-year survival after radical prostatectomy: specimen Gleason score is the predictor in organ-confined prostate cancer

Pathologic stage is a major prognostic factor in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. However, disease recurrence occurs even in patients with organ-confined disease. With the advent of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing, the percentage of patients with pathologically organ-confined tumors has increased significantly. We studied clinical/pathologic factors that will predict disease recurrence in patients with pathologically organ-confined tumors. Patients with clinically localized newly diagnosed prostate cancer who had not received prior therapeutic intervention but who underwent radical prostatectomy as definitive treatment between 1990 and 1999, were included in this study. Clinical/pathologic parameters including age, race, clinical stage, preoperative PSA, and biopsy and specimen Gleason scores (grouped as 2-6, 7, and 8-10) were correlated with disease-free survival in patients with organ-confined disease. Metastasis-free and cancer-specific survival for the cohort was also assessed. A total of 1045 patients fulfilled our inclusion criteria. Overall, the 10-year estimates of PSA progression-free, metastasis-free, and cancer-specific survival were 75%, 91%, and 92%, respectively. Cancer was confined to the prostate in 532 of 1045 patients (51%), of whom 96% (511 of 532) remain PSA progression-free, compared to 65% (335 of 513) with extraprostatic disease (P = 0.0001). Interestingly, in patients with organ-confined disease, the specimen Gleason score was the only prognostic factor for disease recurrence after multivariable analysis. Radical prostatectomy provided excellent cancer control. For patients with pathologically organ-confined tumors, the specimen Gleason score is the only factor predictive of disease-free survival. Of note, Gleason scores of 8-10 are uncommon in these patients.     

Prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in patients with extraprostatic carcinoma after radical prostatectomy

BACKGROUND: A significant number of prostate adenocarcinoma patients undergoing radical prostatectomy are found to have microscopic extraprostatic disease extension. A majority of these patients have focal extraprostatic extension limited to one or both sides of the prostate. In addition, positive surgical margins are a common pathologic finding in this patient subgroup. In the current study, the authors evaluated the impact of positive surgical margins as an independent predictive factor for prostate specific antigen (PSA) progression in patients with pT3a/b N0M0 carcinoma. METHODS: The Mayo Clinic prostate cancer registry list provided 1202 patients with pT3a/b NO prostate carcinoma (no seminal vesicle or regional lymph node involvement) who underwent a radical prostatectomy between 1987-1995. To reduce confounding variables, patients who received preoperative therapy or adjuvant therapy were excluded, resulting in 842 patients who were eligible for analysis. RESULTS: A total of 354 patients (42%) had > or = 1 positive surgical margins whereas 488 patients (58%) demonstrated no margin involvement. The sites of margin positivity were as follows: apex (n = 163), base (n = 47), posterior prostate (n = 227), and anterior prostate (n = 11). A total of 111 patients had > or = 2 positive surgical margins. The 5-year survival free of clinical recurrence and/or biochemical failure (postoperative PSA level > 0.2 ng/mL) for patients with no positive surgical margins was 76% and was 65% for patients with 1 positive surgical margin (P = 0.0001). There was no significant difference in biochemical disease progression between patients with 1 versus those with > or = 2 surgical margins (65% vs. 62%). Multivariate analysis revealed that positive surgical margins were a significant predictor (P = 0.0017) of clinical disease recurrence and biochemical failure (relative risk, 1.55; 95% confidence interval, 1.18-2.04) after controlling for preoperative PSA, Gleason score, and DNA ploidy. CONCLUSIONS: In the current study, positive surgical margins were found to be a significant predictor of disease recurrence in patients with pT3a/b NO prostate carcinoma, a finding that is independent of PSA, Gleason score, and DNA ploidy. The benefit of adjuvant therapy in optimizing recurrence-free survival remains to be tested.     

Ten-Year Survival After Radical Prostatectomy: Specimen Gleason Score Is the Predictor in Organ-Confined Prostate Cancer

Pathologic stage is a major prognostic factor in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. However, disease recurrence occurs even in patients with organ-confined disease. With the advent of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing, the percentage of patients with pathologically organ-confined tumors has increased significantly. We studied clinical/pathologic factors that will predict disease recurrence in patients with pathologically organ-confined tumors. Patients with clinically localized newly diagnosed prostate cancer who had not received prior therapeutic intervention but who underwent radical prostatectomy as definitive treatment between 1990 and 1999, were included in this study. Clinical/pathologic parameters including age, race, clinical stage, preoperative PSA, and biopsy and specimen Gleason scores (grouped as 2-6, 7, and 8-10) were correlated with disease-free survival in patients with organ-confined disease. Metastasis-free and cancer-specific survival for the cohort was also assessed. A total of 1045 patients fulfilled our inclusion criteria. Overall, the 10-year estimates of PSA progression-free, metastasis-free, and cancer-specific survival were 75%, 91%, and 92%, respectively. Cancer was confined to the prostate in 532 of 1045 patients (51%), of whom 96% (511 of 532) remain PSA progression-free, compared to 65% (335 of 513) with extraprostatic disease (P = 0.0001). Interestingly, in patients with organ-confined disease, the specimen Gleason score was the only prognostic factor for disease recurrence after multivariable analysis. Radical prostatectomy provided excellent cancer control. For patients with pathologically organ-confined tumors, the specimen Gleason score is the only factor predictive of disease-free survival. Of note, Gleason scores of 8-10 are uncommon in these patients.     

Predicting prostate carcinoma volume and stage at radical prostatectomy by assessing needle biopsy specimens for percent surface area and cores positive for carcinoma, perineural invasion, Gleason score, DNA ploidy and proliferation, and preoperative serum prostate specific antigen: a report of 454 cases

BACKGROUND: DNA ploidy analysis of prostate carcinoma is a generally accepted prognostic marker, particularly when tumors are extraprostatic at the time of surgery. In the past decade, the DNA content of prostate carcinoma frequently has been assessed in needle biopsy specimens based on the assumption that ploidy, in conjunction with serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) and Gleason score, provides valuable pretreatment information. METHODS: Between 1995 and 1998, the authors identified a consecutive series of 454 prostate carcinomas, verified by needle biopsies and followed by radical retropubic prostatectomies (RRP). Based on the needle biopsies, DNA ploidy and MIB-I immunostaining were measured by digital image analysis (DIA). The authors also quantified the percent of nuclei in four categories from the DNA histograms. The DIA data were combined with the age of the patient at diagnosis, the serum PSA, Gleason score, percent cores and percent surface area positive for carcinoma, and status of perineural invasion in multivariate models using tumor volume and risk of extraprostatic extension (EPE) at RRP as the outcome variables. RESULTS: Joint predictors of tumor volume at RRP were the percent cores positive for carcinoma (P < 0.0001), serum PSA (P < 0.0001), the percent surface area positive for carcinoma (P < 0.0001), and the percent nuclei classified by DNA quantification to be in the "S-phase" category (P = 0.03). Joint predictors of risk of EPE were the percent cores positive for carcinoma (P = 0.0004), a Gleason score of 7 (P < 0.0001), a Gleason score of 8 or 9 (P < 0.0001), serum PSA (P = 0.006) and perineural invasion (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: After adjusting for traditional prognostic markers, DNA ploidy interpretation and MIB-I quantitation of prostate carcinoma did not appear to jointly predict either outcome variable in the multivariate models. However, a quantitative measure related to both ploidy and proliferation, the percent of nuclei in the putative "S-phase" category from the DIA histograms, was found to jointly predict for tumor volume.     

The combined percentage of Gleason patterns 4 and 5 is the best predictor of cancer progression after radical prostatectomy.

PURPOSE: Clinical outcome is variable in prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy. The Gleason histologic grade of prostatic adenocarcinoma is one of the strongest predictors of biologic aggressiveness of prostate cancer. We evaluated the significance of the relative proportion of high-grade cancer (Gleason patterns 4 and/or 5) in predicting cancer progression in prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Radical prostatectomy specimens from 364 consecutive prostate cancer patients were totally embedded and whole mounted. Various clinical and pathologic characteristics were analyzed. All pathologic data, including Gleason grading variables, were collected prospectively. RESULTS: A multiple-factor analysis was performed that included the combined percentage of Gleason patterns 4 and 5, Gleason score, tumor stage, surgical margin status, preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA), extraprostatic extension, and total tumor volume. Using Cox regression analysis with bootstrap resampling for predictor selection, we identified the combined percentage of Gleason patterns 4 and 5 (P < .0001) and total tumor volume (P = .009) as significant predictors of PSA recurrence. CONCLUSION: The combined percentage of Gleason patterns 4 and 5 is one of the most powerful predictors of patient outcome, and appears superior to conventional Gleason score in identifying patients at increased risk of disease progression. On the basis of our results, we recommend that the combined percentage of Gleason patterns 4 and 5 be evaluated in radical prostatectomy specimens. The amount of high-grade cancer in a prostatectomy specimen should be taken into account in therapeutic decision making and assessment of patient prognosis.     

Correlation of margin status and extraprostatic extension with progression of prostate carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The correlation of surgical margins and extraprostatic extension (EPE) with progression is uncertain with regard to prostate carcinoma patients treated by radical prostatectomy. The objective of this study was to define factors predictive of cancer progression; emphasis was placed on surgical margins and their relation to extraprostatic extension. METHODS: The study group consisted of 377 patients who were treated by radical retropubic prostatectomy and bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy at the Mayo Clinic between 1986 and 1993. All specimens were totally embedded and whole-mounted. Patients ranged in age from 41 to 79 years (mean, 65 years). Those with seminal vesicle invasion or lymph node metastasis and those treated preoperatively with radiation or androgen deprivation were excluded. Final pathologic T classifications were pT2a (41 patients), pT2b (237), and pT3a (99). Progression was defined as biochemical failure (prostate specific antigen [PSA] >0.2 ng/mL), clinical or biopsy-proven local recurrence, or distant metastasis. The mean follow-up was 5.8 years (range, 0.2-11.4 years). Seventy-nine patients who received adjuvant treatment within 3 months after surgery were excluded from survival analysis. RESULTS: The overall margin positivity rate was 29%. Seventy-two patients (19%) had only positive surgical margins without evidence of EPE ("surgical incision"), 53 (14%) had only EPE, 37 (10%) had both, and 215 (57%) had neither. Positive margins were correlated with the finding of EPE (P = 0.003). Progression free survival rates at 5 and 10 years were 88% and 67%, respectively. In univariate analysis, preoperative PSA concentration, positive surgical margins, Gleason grade, cancer volume, and DNA ploidy were significant in predicting progression (P values, <0.001, <0.001, 0.01, 0.007, and <0.001, respectively). In multivariate analysis, margin status and DNA ploidy were independent predictors of progression (relative risk for margin status, 1.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-3.4; P = 0.03; relative risk for DNA ploidy, 5.1; 95% CI, 2.4-10.9; P<0.001). Among patients with positive margins, 5-year progression free survival was 78% for those with negative EPE and 55% for those with positive EPE. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical margin status and DNA ploidy were independent predictors of progression after radical prostatectomy. To improve cancer control, adjuvant therapy may be considered for patients with positive surgical margins or nondiploid cancer.     

Prognostic significance of Gleason pattern in patients with Gleason score 7 prostate carcinoma

BACKGROUND: In the current study, the authors sought to further stratify the prognosis of patients with Gleason score (GS) 7 prostate carcinoma. They assessed the influence on outcome of a predominant poorly differentiated Gleason pattern (primary Gleason pattern [GP] 4) and/or a coincident small focus of poorly differentiated tumor of higher grade (tertiary GP 5). METHODS: The authors studied 412 patients (mean postoperative follow-up, 33 months) with GS 7 tumors treated with radical prostatectomy at a single Australian campus between November 1989 and December 2002. The chi-square test, Kaplan-Meier method, and Cox proportional hazards analyses were used to evaluate the correlation between primary GP 4 and tertiary GP 5 with the occurrence of adverse pathologic features and disease recurrence. RESULTS: In this cohort, 307 patients (75%) had primary GP 3 tumors, 105 (25%) had primary GP 4 tumors, and 17 (2.3%) had a tertiary element of high-grade tumor (GP 5). Patients with primary GP 4 tumors displayed higher rates of seminal vesicle involvement and extraprostatic extension and, along with patients with tertiary GP 5, had significantly shorter times to disease recurrence. Univariate analysis demonstrated that primary GP 4 (P = 0.0003) and tertiary GP 5 (P < 0.0001) were strong predictors of disease recurrence. Primary GP 4 (P = 0.0122) remained an independent predictor of disease recurrence on stepwise multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Primary GP 4 tumors represented an aggressive subset of GS 7 prostate carcinomas. Primary GP was an easily accessible and clinically relevant predictor of disease recurrence in patients with GS 7 prostate carcinoma.     

Prostate specific antigen outcome based on the extent of extracapsular extension and margin status in patients with seminal vesicle negative prostate carcinoma of Gleason score < or = 7

BACKGROUND: Early (< or = 2 years) prostate specific antigen (PSA) failure after radical prostatectomy (RP) has been shown to predict for distant failure. After excluding patients with the pathologic predictors of early PSA failure, an analysis of PSA failure free (bNED) survival was performed to identify patients who may benefit from the use of postprostatectomy radiation therapy (RT). METHODS: Of 1,028 patients treated with RP for clinically localized prostate carcinoma between 1989 and 1999, 862 (84%) had either organ confined (OC), specimen confined (SC), or margin positive disease with negative seminal vesicles (SV) and a prostatectomy Gleason score < or = 7. A Cox regression multivariate analysis was performed in these patients evaluating the ability of the extent of extracapsular extension (ECE) (into but not through the capsule, SC focal ECE, SC established ECE, margin positive) and prostatectomy Gleason score (2-6 vs. 7) to predict time to postoperative PSA failure. RESULTS: SC focal ECE (P = 0.0017), SC established ECE (P < 0.0001), and margin positive disease (P < 0.0001) were significant predictors of time to postoperative PSA failure, whereas prostatectomy Gleason score and disease extending into but not through the capsule were not. Five-year bNED rates were 90%, 88%, 69%, 45%, and 33% for patients with OC, into but not through capsule, SC focal ECE, SC established ECE, and margin positive prostate carcinoma, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with SC ECE or margin positive prostate carcinoma and a prostatectomy Gleason score < or = 7 with no evidence of SV invasion may benefit from adjuvant postoperative RT.     

The impact of the biopsy Gleason score on PSA outcome for prostate cancer patients with PSA < or = 10 ng/ml and T1c,2a: implications for patient selection for prostate-only therapy

PURPOSE: This study was performed to determine the ability of the biopsy Gleason score, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, and the 1992 American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) clinical T-stage for predicting time to postoperative PSA failure for patients with a PSA < or =10 ng/ml and T1c or T2a disease. Specific attention is given to the patient subgroup with biopsy Gleason 3 + 4 vs. 4 + 3. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A concordance map of the biopsy and prostatectomy Gleason grades and a clinical-pathologic correlation of the PSA, biopsy Gleason score, and 1992 AJCC T-stage and pathologic stage were performed. A Cox regression multivariable analysis was used to evaluate the ability of the biopsy Gleason score, PSA, and 1992 AJCC T-stage to predict time to PSA failure for 457 men managed with a radical prostatectomy (RP). RESULTS: The absence of prostatectomy Gleason grade 4 or 5 disease was noted in 71%, 50%, and 11% of patients with biopsy Gleason score 2-6, 3 + 4, and > or =4 + 3 disease respectively while pathologic evidence of seminal vesicle invasion was noted in 2%, 4%, and 17% of these patients respectively. Estimates of 5-year PSA failure-free survival rates were not statistically different for patients with biopsy Gleason score 2-6 vs. 3 + 4 (79% vs. 81%; p = 0.93), but were significantly different for patients having biopsy Gleason score 2-6 vs. 4 + 3 (79% vs. 62%; p = 0.04) or 2-6 vs. 8-10 (79% vs. 18%; p = 0.0001) prostate cancer. CONCLUSION: Based on the pathologic stage and PSA control data following RP, patients with biopsy Gleason 3 + 4 disease and PSA < or =10 ng/ml and 1992 AJCC T1c or T2a disease may be suitable candidates for radiation therapy directed at the prostate only.     

In treating localized prostate cancer the efficacy of cryoablation is independent of DNA ploidy type

While the prognostic value of DNA ploidy has been well established for radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation, brachytherapy and androgen deprivation therapy its role as a survival outcome predictor for prostate cancer patients treated with cryoablation has not yet been examined. Anecdotal evidence suggesting that cryoablation may be independent of DNA ploidy type led to the implementation of the current study. Retrospective analysis of data including flow digital cytometry was performed on 447 archival specimens taken from patients who had undergone cryosurgical ablation of primary prostate cancer. Five-year biochemical disease free survivals (bDFS) (defined as PSA thresholds of 0.5 and 1.0 ng/ml) were determined with Kaplan-Meier analysis. Patients were grouped according to DNA ploidy types then stratified by Gleason grade, risk group, pre-surgical PSA level, and disease stage. Mean and median age of the cohort was 65 and 64.6 years. Mean follow-up was 65.7 months. The DNA ploidy status of the population was found to be 59% diploid, 13% tetraploid, and 28% aneuploid. Using PSA < 1.0 ng/ml criterion, the bDFS rates for diploid, tetraploid, and aneuploid were 78%, 75%, and 79% respectively. The bDFS rates using a PSA < 0.5 ng/ml criterion were 67%, 59%, and 69% for diploid, tetraploid, and aneuploid groups. No significant outcome differences were found in stratified analysis. This investigation demonstrates that the efficacy of cryoablation is independent of DNA ploidy type.     

Prediction of pelvic lymph node metastasis by the ratio of cathepsin B to stefin A in patients with prostate carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Pathologic grade and/or histologic score, extraprostatic extension indicated by invasion of the prostatic capsule, margin, and/or seminal vesicles by prostate cancer cells, serum total prostate-specific antigen (PSA), free PSA, complexed PSA levels and/or their ratios, regional pelvic lymph node metastases, and clinical staging have been used to diagnose and monitor the treatment of prostate carcinoma (PC) patients. The Gleason grading system is also used to grade/score a patient's stage of disease, with lower to higher scores indicating progression of PC. However, Gleason's system cannot be used to distinguish biologically aggressive PCs within a single Gleason score. Our objective was to identify subpopulations (or clones) of aggressive prostate cancers within an individual Gleason score by utilizing biological molecule(s) that also facilitate cancer cell invasion to prostatic stroma and metastasis to the lymph nodes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Specimens were collected from 97 patients with PC and from 8 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. These patients had not been treated with hormonal and/or chemotherapeutic agents before undergoing a prostatectomy at the Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical Center. Formalin-fixed, paraffin or paraplast-embedded prostate tissue sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin for pathologic diagnosis and adjacent sections were stained for for immunohistochemical study. We also collected data on age, race, extraprostatic extension, margin status, seminal vesicle, and lymph node invasion by cancer cells, clinical stage at prostatectomy, and mortality/survival data, including the available presurgery and postsurgery serum total PSA and prostatic acid phosphatase concentrations in patients. Immunohistochemical localization of mouse or rabbit anti-cathepsin B (CB) antibody IgG and mouse antihuman stefin (cystatin) A IgG was quantified using a computer-based image analysis system equipped with Metamorph software. RESULTS: CB and stefin A identified aggressive and less aggressive clones of PCs within an individual Gleason score. Tumors with a Gleason Score of 6 that are similar histologically and morphologically were heterogeneous with respect to the ratios of CB to stefin A (CB > stefin A, CB = stefin A, and CB < stefin A). We also found a significant positive association (P = 0.0066) between ratios of CB and stefin A (CB > stefin A) and the incidence of pelvic lymph node metastases, but not with ratios of CB less than stefin A and/or ratios of CB equal to stefin A. Patients with Gleason 7 PCs had a higher incidence of positive lymph nodes than those with Gleason Score 6 tumors. Our data indicated that mortality rates increased in patients when the ratios of CB were greater than stefin A. CONCLUSIONS: PC within an individual Gleason score is a heterogeneous tumor that contains clones or subpopulations of aggressive and less aggressive tumors that can be defined by the ratios of CB to stefin A. PC with an aggressive clone can be identified when the ratio of CB is greater than that of stefin A. Less aggressive clones are identified when the ratio of CB is less than that of stefin A or when the ratio of CB is equal to that of stefin A. The ratios of CB to stefin A can be used in the differential diagnosis and treatment of patients with PC. This is the first report to identify phenotypes of aggressive and less aggressive PCs within a Gleason score.     

Prognostic significance of DNA ploidy, S-phase fraction, and P-glycoprotein expression in colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Parameters that allow prediction of the disease course in colorectal cancer would aid the development of improved treatment strategies. For this reason, we evaluated the prognostic value of flow cytometric DNA ploidy and S-phase fraction (SPF) and P-glycoprotein (Pgp) expression in this type of tumor. METHODS: The prognostic significance of DNA ploidy, SPF, and Pgp expression on paraffin-embedded sections from 107 patients with colorectal carcinoma was determined. The mean follow-up was 36.6 months (range = 3-72 months). DNA ploidy and SPF were evaluated by flow cytometry and Pgp by immunohistochemistry using monoclonal antibody C219. The Cox regression model was used to adjust for several clinical and pathologic covariates. RESULTS: Of the 107 carcinomas examined, 44 (41.1%) were classified as DNA diploid and 63 (58.9%) as DNA aneuploid. DNA ploidy pattern was significantly related to tumor site (P = 0.010), tumor stage (P = 0.016), and vascular invasion (P = 0.015) but not to other clinicopathologic variables. Patients with DNA diploid tumors showed a better survival rate than did those with aneuploid tumors. After stage IV disease was excluded, patients with diploid tumors also presented a better disease-free and overall survival than did patients with aneuploid tumors. Mean SPF of the whole series was 13.5% (median = 11.3%, range = 1.4%-29.9%). Aneuploid tumors had a higher median SPF than did diploid tumors (17 vs. 6.2; P = 0.0001). SPF was only related significantly with tumor location (P = 0.026). In the multivariate analysis, SPF was a significant independent prognostic factor for overall survival (P = 0.01). When stage IV was excluded, SPF was also an independent prognostic variable for both disease-free (P = 0. 02) and overall (P = 0.01) survival. Of 107 tumors, 61 (57%) were positive for Pgp expression, but no relation was found between this and other clinicopathologic parameters. Pgp expression had no influence on survival. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that flow cytometric DNA ploidy and SPF are significant and independent prognostic factors in patients with colorectal carcinoma, whereas Pgp expression is not.     

Caveolin-1 expression is a predictor of recurrence-free survival in pT2N0 prostate carcinoma diagnosed in Japanese patients

BACKGROUND: The authors previously identified elevated caveolin-1 expression in human prostate carcinoma and determined that caveolin-1 levels as detected by immunohistochemistry of radical prostatectomy specimens offered novel prognostic information. A higher incidence of caveolin-1 expression also was reported in African-American men compared with white men in the U.S. To explore these ethnic/racial differences in caveolin-1 expression further, the authors evaluated caveolin-1 expression as a predictive marker in Japanese men with prostate carcinoma. METHODS: Immunohistochemical staining with a caveolin-1 specific antibody was performed on routinely processed paraffin sections from 152 consecutively collected radical prostatectomy specimens. The mean patient age was 64.3 years (range, 49-74 years; median, 64.5 years) and the mean follow-up period was 49.5 months (range, 1.3-103.3 months; median, 48.2 months). Caveolin-1 immunoreactivity was evaluated in association with patient's age; preoperative prostate specific antigen level; clinical stage; and pathologic features including Gleason score, extraprostatic extension, status of surgical margins, seminal vesicle involvement, lymph node involvement, and time to disease progression after surgery. RESULTS: Positive caveolin-1 immunostaining was detected in 46 of the 152 tumors (30.3%) and was found to be associated significantly with a positive surgical margin (P = 0.022). A higher incidence of caveolin-1 expression tended to be found in patients with poorly differentiated tumors (Gleason score > 7, 6-7, and < 6, 35.0% vs. 34.9% vs. 20.4%, respectively) or in patients with extraprostatic extension versus those without extraprostatic extension (35.4% vs. 24.7%) or patients with lymph node involvement compared with those without lymph node involvement (50% vs. 29.5%), although these differences did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.100, P = 0.150, and P = 0.178, respectively, by the Spearman correlation test). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that increased caveolin-1 expression was associated with an increased risk of disease progression at 5 years (P = 0.0122 by the log-rank test). In patients with organ-confined (pT2N0) disease, univariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis revealed that positive caveolin-1 expression was the only significant predictor of disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy (P = 0.011; hazards ratio = 4.75; and 95% confidence interval, 1.43-15.76). CONCLUSIONS: The results of the current study confirm that positive caveolin-1 expression is associated with clinical markers of disease progression and is predictive of poor clinical outcome after surgery in Japanese patients with pT2N0 prostate carcinoma.     

Optimizing patient selection for prostate monotherapy

PURPOSE: Patients at low risk for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) failure following definitive local therapy are those with PSA of 10 or less, biopsy Gleason Score of 6 or less, and 1992 American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) clinical Stage T1c or T2a. However, low-risk patients managed with radical prostatectomy and found to have prostatectomy Gleason score > or = 3+4 have a less favorable PSA outcome when compared to patients with prostatectomy Gleason score < or = 3+3. This study was performed to determine whether the percentage of positive prostate biopsy cores could predict upgrading from a biopsy Gleason score of 6 or less to a prostatectomy Gleason score > or = 3+4 in low-risk patients to optimize selection for prostate only radiation therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Concordance testing of the biopsy Gleason score and the primary and secondary prostatectomy Gleason grades was performed in 427 prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy and at low risk for PSA failure. Logistic regression multivariable analysis was performed to test the ability of the established prognostic factors and the percentage of positive prostate biopsies (<34%, 34-50%, >50%) to predict for upgrading from biopsy Gleason score of 6 or less prostatectomy Gleason score > or = 3+4. PSA failure-free survival was reported using the actuarial method of Kaplan and Meier and comparisons were made using a log-rank test. RESULTS: Twenty-nine percent of the 427 study patients were upgraded from a biopsy Gleason score of 6 or less to a prostatectomy Gleason score > or = 3+4. The presence of greater than 50% positive biopsies was the only significant factor for predicting the upgrading from biopsy Gleason score of 6 or less to prostatectomy Gleason score > or = 3+4 on logistic regression multivariable analysis with the variables treated as continuous and categorical. Specifically, upgrading occurred in 26% vs. 59% of patients with 50% or less vs. greater than 50% positive biopsies, respectively. This translated into a 5-year PSA failure-free survival which was significantly higher (92% vs. 62%, p = 0.00001) for men with 50% or less vs. greater than 50% positive prostate biopsies, respectively. CONCLUSION: The presence of greater than 50% positive biopsies was associated with higher rates of pathologic upgrading which translated into lower 5-year PSA failure-free survival following radical prostatectomy (RP). Therefore, the percentage of positive biopsies may be useful in optimizing the selection of low-risk patients for prostate only radiation therapy such as external beam radiation or implant monotherapy.     

Predictors of mortality after androgen-deprivation therapy in patients with rapidly rising prostate-specific antigen levels after local therapy for prostate cancer

BACKGROUND: The authors identified biochemical and pathologic factors that were associated significantly with prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) after androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in men who had rapidly rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels after they received local treatment. METHODS: The study population consisted of 67 patients who had a PSA doubling time (DT) < or =6 months after radical prostatectomy (n = 50 patients) or external beam radiation therapy (n = 17 patients) for localized prostate cancer. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to evaluate whether the interval to PSA failure, pre-ADT PSA DT, PSA level at the time of ADT initiation, time to PSA nadir, PSA nadir after 8 months on ADT, and Gleason score were associated significantly with the time to PCSM 8 months after the initiation of ADT. RESULTS.: A PSA nadir >0.2 ng/mL (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 8.0; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.7-38.7; P = 0.009) and a Gleason score > or =8 (adjusted HR, 5.2; 95% CI, 1.3-20.6; P = 0.02) were associated significantly with a short time to PCSM. The cumulative incidence estimates of 3-year PCSM were 5.8% versus 50.9% for patients with a PSA nadir < or =0.2 ng/mL versus >0.2 ng/mL, respectively, and 10.8% versus 35.8% for patients who had tumors with a Gleason score < or =7 versus > or =8, respectively. CONCLUSIONS.: Among men with a PSA DT < or =6 months, both a PSA nadir >0.2 ng/mL after ADT and a Gleason score > or =8 cancer identified men who were at high risk for PCSM. These men would be ideal candidates for Phase III studies that evaluate the impact on survival of new systemic therapies for prostate cancer.     

The clinical significance of nuclear DNA ploidy pattern in 184 patients with pheochromocytoma.

Flow cytometric nuclear DNA analysis was performed on paraffin-embedded tissue samples taken from 184 patients with pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma treated between 1960 and 1987. The Hedley technique was used for measurement of nuclear DNA content. Thirty-five percent of the tumors were DNA diploid, 33% showed a DNA tetraploid pattern, and 32% had DNA aneuploid pattern. Familial pheochromocytoma and associated endocrine or neoplastic disorders were more common among patients with DNA nondiploid tumors. Eighty-four percent of the tumors that invaded blood vessels and all patients with regional or distant metastases had tumors classified as DNA tetraploid or DNA aneuploid. Of 22 patients who had disease progression, 21 (95%) had tumors with abnormal DNA ploidy pattern (P less than 0.001). All 12 patients who died of cancer-related disease had abnormal DNA ploidy; none of the patients with DNA diploid tumor (n = 64) have died of pheochromocytoma (P less than 0.01). These results suggest that nuclear DNA ploidy pattern is an important and independent prognostic variable for patients with pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma.     

Clinical utility of endorectal MRI in determining PSA outcome for patients with biopsy Gleason score 7, PSA <or=10, and clinically localized prostate cancer

PURPOSE: Although the optimal management for patients with high-grade clinically localized prostate cancer is undefined, radical prostatectomy (RP) or external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) is performed. The clinical utility of the pretreatment prostrate-specific antigen (PSA) level (10 ng/mL) and endorectal MRI (erMRI) stage (T3 vs. T2) to stratify PSA outcome after RP in these patients was evaluated. METHODS AND MATERIALS: erMRI was performed in 147 men with biopsy Gleason score >or=7 and 1992 AJCC clinical Stage T1c or T2a disease before RP. Enumerations of the biopsy and prostatectomy Gleason scores, pathologic stage, and margin status were performed for each pretreatment group on the basis of erMRI findings and PSA level. Comparisons were made using a chi-square metric. The median follow-up was 4.5 years (range 1-10 years). Comparisons of the actuarial freedom from PSA failure (bNED) were made using the log-rank test. RESULTS: erMRI Stage T2 and T3 disease was found in 132 and 15 patients, respectively. On stratification by PSA level, patients with erMRI T3 disease had similar bNED outcomes (p = 0.46), regardless of the PSA level. The 3-year bNED rate was 82%, 64%, and 25% (p <0.0001) for Group 1 (erMRI T2 and PSA 10 ng/mL), and Group 3 (erMRI T3 with any PSA level), respectively. The rates of prostatectomy T3 disease, biopsy and prostatectomy Gleason score 8-10, and positive surgical margins were significantly higher (p or=7, PSA 相似文献   

Perineural invasion is a marker for pathologically advanced disease in localized prostate cancer

PURPOSE: To determine if perineural invasion (PNI) should be included in addition to prostate-specific antigen (PSA), biopsy Gleason score, and clinical T-stage for risk-stratification of patients with localized prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We analyzed prostatectomy findings for 1550 patients, from a prospectively collected institutional database, to determine whether PNI was a significant predictor for upgrading of Gleason score or pathologic T3 disease after patients were stratified into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups (on the basis of PSA, biopsy Gleason score, and clinical T-stage). RESULTS: For the overall population, PNI was associated with a significantly increased frequency of upgrading and of pathologic T3 disease. After stratification, PNI was still associated with significantly increased odds of pathologic T3 disease within each risk group. In particular, for low-risk patients, there was a markedly increased risk of extraprostatic extension (23% vs. 7%), comparable to that of intermediate-risk patients. Among high-risk patients, PNI was associated with an increased risk of seminal vesicle invasion and lymph node involvement. Furthermore, over 80% of high-risk patients with PNI were noted to have an indication for postoperative radiation. CONCLUSIONS: Perineural invasion may be useful for risk-stratification of prostate cancer. Our data suggest that low-risk patients with PNI on biopsy may benefit from treatment typically reserved for those with intermediate-risk disease. In addition, men with high-risk disease and PNI, who are contemplating surgery, should be informed of the high likelihood of having an indication for postoperative radiation therapy.