Acute promyelocytic leukemia: where does it stem from?

A fundamental issue in cancer biology is the identification of the target cell in which the causative molecular lesion arises. Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is thought to reflect the transformation of a primitive stem cell compartment. The resultant 'cancer stem cells' comprise only a minor portion of the leukemic clone but give rise through differentiation to more committed progenitors as well as differentiated blasts that constitute the bulk of the tumor. The maintenance of the leukemic clone is dependent on the self-renewal capacity of the cancer stem cell compartment, which is revealed by its ability to re-initiate leukemia in a transplant setting. The cellular basis of acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) is however less clear. APL has traditionally been considered to be the most differentiated form of AML and to arise from a committed myeloid progenitor. Here we review apparently conflicting evidence pertaining to the cellular origins of APL and propose that this leukemia may originate in more than one cellular compartment. This view could account for many apparent inconsistencies in the literature to date. An understanding of the nature of the target cell involved in transformation of APL has important implications for biological mechanism and for clinical treatment.     

Tumor stem cells

Stem cells possess two basic characteristics: they are able to renew themselves and to develop into different cell types. The link between normal stem cells and tumor cells could be examined in three aspects: what are the differences and similarities in the control of self-renewal capacity between stem cells and tumor cells; whether tumor cells arise from stem cells; do tumorous stem cells exist? Since tumor cells also exhibit self-renewal capacity, it seems plausible that their regulation is similar to that of the stem cells. The infinite self-renewal ability (immortalization) is assured by several, so far only partly known, mechanisms. One of these is telomerase activity, another important regulatory step for survival is the inhibition of apoptosis. Other signal transduction pathways in stem cell regulation may also play certain roles in carcinogenesis: e.g. Notch, Sonic hedgehog (SHH), and Wnt signals. Existence of tumor stem cells was suggested since it is simpler to retain the self-renewal capacity than to reactivate the immortality program in an already differentiated cell. Moreover, stem cells live much longer than the differentiated ones, and so they are exposed for a long period of time to impairments, collecting gene errors leading to the breakdown of the regulation. However, it is still an open question whether all cells in the tumor possess the capacity that produces this tissue or not, that is: are there tumor stem cells or there are not. If tumor stem cells exist, they would be the main target for therapy: only these must be killed since the other tumor cells possess limited proliferative capacity, therefore limited life span. The only problem is that during tumor progression stem-like cells can develop continuously and the identification but mainly the prevention of their formation is still a great challenge.(Pathology Oncology Research Vol 10, No 2, 69–73)     

Tumour stem cell-targeted treatment: elimination or differentiation.

A wide range of studies suggest that most cancers are clonal and may represent the progeny of a single cell, a cancer stem cell (CSC) endowed with the capacity to maintain tumour growth. The concept of a cancer stem cell emerged decades ago, and the haematopoietic system is where it has mostly gained ground. More recently, CSC have been described in breast cancer and brain tumours. Growing evidence suggests that pathways regulating normal stem cell self-renewal and differentiation are also present in cancer cells and CSC. Malignant tumours can be viewed as an abnormal organ in which a small population of tumourigenic cancer stem cells have escaped the normal limits of self-renewal giving rise to abnormally differentiated cancer cells that contribute to tumour progression and growth. This new model has important implications for the study and treatment of cancer. Understanding the molecular circuitry which contributes to the maintenance of stem cells may provide an insight into the molecular mechanisms of cancer and thus new approaches for elimination or differentiation therapy. Therapies targeting CSC should focus on pathways such as Wnt, Shh and Notch which are required for the maintenance of cancer stem cells, but also on the ABC transporter family and other specific properties of cancer stem cells.     

Targeting stem cells in brain tumors

Stem cells are commonly defined as undifferentiated cells capable of self-renewing and giving rise to a large number of differentiated progeny. It is becoming increasingly apparent that there exist cancer stem cells (CSCs) from which the cells of any given malignancy arise, whereby only a few cells out of a population of cancer cells are able to initiate tumor formation. These CSCs, like their normal counterparts, are characterized by self-renewal and the ability to "differentiate" into all of the cell types in the original tumor. Current chemotherapeutic strategies involve using non-specific cytotoxic agents that target rapidly cycling cells. Although this may reduce disease burden in many cases, these therapies may miss the rare, self-renewing population that truly gives rise to the malignancy (the CSC). This review will focus on the recent discovery of stem cell-like cells in human brain tumors, putative "brain cancer stem cells," which exhibit the properties of self-renewal and the ability to recapitulate the original tumor heterogeneity. Dissecting the molecular mechanisms that underlie the ability of these cells to self-renew and maintain quiescence may allow the development of novel therapeutic strategies that will allow for more efficacious and less toxic therapies for these devastating malignancies.     

Cancer stem cell niche: the place to be

Tumors are being increasingly perceived as abnormal organs that, in many respects, recapitulate the outgrowth and differentiation patterns of normal tissues. In line with this idea is the observation that only a small fraction of tumor cells is capable of initiating a new tumor. Because of the features that these cells share with somatic stem cells, they have been termed cancer stem cells (CSC). Normal stem cells reside in a "stem cell niche" that maintains them in a stem-like state. Recent data suggest that CSCs also rely on a similar niche, dubbed the "CSC niche," which controls their self-renewal and differentiation. Moreover, CSCs can be generated by the microenvironment through induction of CSC features in more differentiated tumor cells. In addition to a role in CSC maintenance, the microenvironment is hypothesized to be involved in metastasis by induction of the epithelial-mesenchymal transition, leading to dissemination and invasion of tumor cells. The localization of secondary tumors also seems to be orchestrated by the microenvironment, which is suggested to form a premetastatic niche. Thus, the microenvironment seems to be of crucial importance for primary tumor growth as well as metastasis formation. Combined with its role in the protection of CSCs against genotoxic insults, these data strongly put forward the niche as an important target for novel therapies.     

Marker-independent Method for Isolating Slow-Dividing Cancer Stem Cells in Human Glioblastoma

Glioblastoma (GBM) is a devastating brain tumor with a poor survival outcome. It is generated and propagated by a small subpopulation of rare and hierarchically organized cells that share stem-like features with normal stem cells but, however, appear dysregulated in terms of self-renewal and proliferation and aberrantly differentiate into cells forming the bulk of the disorganized cancer tissues. The complexity and heterogeneity of human GBMs underlie the lack of standardized and effective treatments. This study is based on the assumption that available markers defining cancer stem cells (CSCs) in all GBMs are not conclusive and further work is required to identify the CSC. We implemented a method to isolate CSCs independently from cell surface markers: four patient-derived GBM neurospheres containing stem, progenitors, and differentiated cells were labeled with PKH-26 fluorescent dye that reliably selects for cells that divide at low rate. Through in vitro and in vivo assays, we investigated the growth and self-renewal properties of the two different compartments of high- and slow-dividing cells. Our data demonstrate that only slow-dividing cells retain the ability of a long-lasting self-renewal capacity after serial in vitro passaging, while high-dividing cells eventually exhaust. Moreover, orthotopic transplantation assay revealed that the incidence of tumors generated by the slow-dividing compartment is significantly higher in the four patient-derived GBM neurospheres analyzed. Importantly, slow-dividing cells feature a population made up of homogeneous stem cells that sustain tumor growth and therefore represent a viable target for GBM therapy development.     

Testing the cancer stem cell hypothesis in melanoma: The clinics will tell

Whether tumorigenic cancer stem cells (CSCs) exist in melanoma has been the focus of much controversy in recent years. A number of studies have pointed to the existence of melanoma cell sub-populations that act as CSCs and can be distinguished from other tumor cells based on specific surface marker expression or specific properties such as the capacity for extensive self-renewal. Other studies failed to identify melanoma stem cells and proposed that the potential to initiate tumors is a wide spread feature in melanoma inherent to most if not all cells of the tumor mass. As with normal stem cells, the term CSC is based on an operational definition, indicating not just a tumor-initiating cell, but also a cell with the capacity to sustain long-term tumor propagation. Therefore, the experimental set-up chosen to identify putative CSCs in melanoma is crucial: Both the method of tumor cell preparation and the procedure used to assess CSC properties in vivo influence the experimental outcome and hence its interpretation. In this review, we summarize our current knowledge on CSCs and the role of stem cell properties in melanoma and discuss recent findings with respect to their clinical relevance.     

Cancer stem cells: an old idea--a paradigm shift

Although the concept that cancers arise from "stem cells" or "germ cells" was first proposed about 150 years ago, it is only recently that advances in stem cell biology have given new impetus to the "cancer stem cell hypothesis." Two important related concepts of this hypothesis are that (a) tumors originate in either tissue stem cells or their immediate progeny through dysregulation of the normally tightly regulated process of self-renewal. As a result of this, (b) tumors contain a cellular subcomponent that retains key stem cell properties. These properties include self-renewal, which drives tumorigenesis, and differentiation albeit aberrant that contributes to cellular heterogeneity. Recent experimental evidence in a variety of tumors has lent strong support to the cancer stem cell hypothesis that represents a paradigm shift in our understanding of carcinogenesis and tumor cell biology. This hypothesis has fundamental implications for cancer risk assessment, early detection, prognostication, and prevention. Furthermore, the current development of cancer therapeutics based on tumor regression may have produced agents that kill differentiated tumor cells while sparing the rare cancer stem cell population. The development of more effective cancer therapies may thus require targeting this important cell population.     

A TARBP2-dependent miRNA expression profile underlies cancer stem cell properties and provides candidate therapeutic reagents in Ewing sarcoma

We have recently demonstrated that human pediatric mesenchymal stem cells can be reprogrammed toward a Ewing sarcoma family tumor (ESFT) cancer stem cell (CSC) phenotype by mechanisms that implicate microRNAs (miRNAs). Here, we show that the miRNA profile of ESFT CSCs is shared by embryonic stem cells and CSCs from divergent tumor types. We also provide evidence that the miRNA profile of ESFT CSCs is the result of reversible disruption of TARBP2-dependent miRNA maturation. Restoration of TARBP2 activity and systemic delivery of synthetic forms of either of two of its targets, miRNA-143 or miRNA-145, inhibited ESFT CSC clonogenicity and tumor growth in vivo. Our observations suggest that CSC self-renewal and tumor maintenance may depend on deregulation of TARBP2-dependent miRNA expression.     

Wnt and BMP signals control intestinal adenoma cell fates

Cellular hierarchies and signals that govern stemness and differentiation of intestinal adenoma cells are not well defined. In this study, we used organotypic culture to investigate the impact of β-catenin and BMP signals in cells that form intestinal adenoma in the mouse. We found that activation of β-catenin signaling by loss of APC or transgenic induction of oncogenic mutant β-catenin (Ctnnb1(mut) ) initiates the conversion of untransformed intestinal cells to tumor cells. These tumor cells display cancer stem cell (CSC) traits such as increased expression of the CSC markers Cd133 and Cd44, a high capacity for self-renewal and unlimited proliferative potential. Subsequent inactivation of transgenic Ctnnb1(mut) results in the reversion of tumor cells to normal intestinal stem cells, which immediately reinstall the cellular hierarchy of the normal intestinal epithelium. Our data demonstrate that oncogenic activation of β-catenin signaling initiates the early steps of intestinal cellular transformation in the absence of irreversible genetic or epigenetic changes. Interestingly, we found that tumor cells in culture and in adenoma produce BMP4, which counteracts CSC-like traits by initiating irreversible cellular differentiation and loss of self-renewal capacity. We conclude that the opposition of stemness-maintaining oncogenic β-catenin signals and autocrine differentiating BMP signals within the adenoma cell provides a rationale for the formation of cellular hierarchies in intestinal adenoma and may serve to limit adenoma growth.     

Eradication of leukemia stem cells as a new goal of therapy in leukemia.

Leukemias have traditionally been classified and treated on the basis of phenotypic characteristics, such as morphology and cell-surface markers, and, more recently, cytogenetic aberrations. These classification systems are flawed because they do not take into account cellular function. The leukemia cell population is functionally heterogeneous: it consists of leukemia stem cells (LSC) and mature leukemia cells that differentiate abnormally to varying extents. Like normal hematopoietic stem cells, LSCs are quiescent and have self-renewal and clonogenic capacity. Because they are quiescent, LSCs do not respond to cell cycle-specific cytotoxic agents used to treat leukemia and so contribute to treatment failure. These cells may undergo mutations and epigenetic changes, further leading to drug resistance and relapse. Recent data suggest that mature leukemia cells may acquire LSC characteristics, thereby evading chemotherapeutic treatment and sustaining the disease. Ongoing research is likely to reveal the molecular mechanisms responsible for LSC characteristics and lead to novel strategies for eradicating leukemia.     

Stem cells, quiescence and rectal carcinoma: an unexplored relationship and potential therapeutic target

Stem cells are responsible for maintaining differentiated cell numbers during normal physiology and at times of tissue stress. They have the unique capabilities of proliferation, self-renewal, clonogenicity and multi-potentiality. It is a widely held belief that stem-like cells, known as cancer stem cells (CSCs), maintain tumours. The majority of currently identified intestinal stem cell populations appear to be rapidly cycling. However, quiescent stem cell populations have been suggested to exist in both normal intestinal crypts and tumours. Quiescent CSCs may have particular significance in the modern management of colorectal cancer making their identification and characterisation a priority. In this review, we discuss the current evidence surrounding the identification and microenvironmental control of stem cell populations in intestinal crypts and tumours as well as exploring the evidence supporting the existence of a quiescent stem and CSC population in the gut and other tissues.     

Identification of a cancer stem cell in human brain tumors

Most current research on human brain tumors is focused on the molecular and cellular analysis of the bulk tumor mass. However, there is overwhelming evidence in some malignancies that the tumor clone is heterogeneous with respect to proliferation and differentiation. In human leukemia, the tumor clone is organized as a hierarchy that originates from rare leukemic stem cells that possess extensive proliferative and self-renewal potential, and are responsible for maintaining the tumor clone. We report here the identification and purification of a cancer stem cell from human brain tumors of different phenotypes that possesses a marked capacity for proliferation, self-renewal, and differentiation. The increased self-renewal capacity of the brain tumor stem cell (BTSC) was highest from the most aggressive clinical samples of medulloblastoma compared with low-grade gliomas. The BTSC was exclusively isolated with the cell fraction expressing the neural stem cell surface marker CD133. These CD133+ cells could differentiate in culture into tumor cells that phenotypically resembled the tumor from the patient. The identification of a BTSC provides a powerful tool to investigate the tumorigenic process in the central nervous system and to develop therapies targeted to the BTSC.     

First among equals: the cancer cell hierarchy

Primary cancer cells exhibit heterogeneity in their proliferative ability. The cancer stem cell (CSC) model accounts for this heterogeneity by proposing that each cancer consists of a small population of CSCs that are capable of unlimited growth and self-renewal and a much larger population of cells, descendants of the CSCs, that have lost self-renewal capacity. The CSC model has important implications for cancer therapy. Eradication of CSCs, the cells responsible for maintenance of the neoplasm, would be necessary and sufficient to achieve cure. By extension, both the frequency of stem cells in a tumor and their propensity to undergo self-renewal (P_sr) would have a direct impact on the curability of that tumor. The P_sr is a critical biological characteristic of CSCs—small differences in P_sr have enormous impact on the probability of success in cancer therapy. Differentiation therapy, defined as treatment that reduces the P_sr of CSCs, is one approach to targeting CSCs.     

Stem cells in breast tumours: Are they ready for the clinic?

The concept of stem-like cells in cancer has been gaining currency over the last decade or so since evidence for stem cell activity in human leukaemia and solid tumours, including breast cancer, was first published. The evidence established that sub-populations of cells identified by antibodies to cell surface markers behaved like developmental stem cells in their capacity to re-grow the human tumour for several generations in experimental immune-deficient hosts. The experiments established that cells with tumourigenic capacity expressed ‘cancer stem cell’ (CSC) markers and that activity could also be measured by self-renewal of tumour sphere colonies in culture. In breast and other cancers, there is good evidence that CSCs are relatively resistant to radio- and chemotherapy indicating that novel CSC-targeted therapies are needed. Several pathways are promising targets in breast CSCs. There are several ways of combating CSC activity including inducing their apoptosis, inhibiting stem cell self-renewal to either stop their division or to promote their differentiation, or targeting the CSC niche that supports them. The first challenge for developing novel CSC therapies is to ascertain which of these CSC properties is being targeted. The second challenge is to determine suitable CSC biomarkers to measure the efficacy of the novel CSC therapies. We propose using biomarkers as a means to identify and assess CSC activity in clinical trials. This is likely to be demanding but feasible in the near future. Thus, we asked if CSCs are ready for the clinic, however, the emerging question becomes: is the clinic ready for cancer stem cells?     

Sequencing of breast cancer stem cell populations indicates a dynamic conversion between differentiation states in vivo

Introduction

The cancer stem cell model implies a hierarchical organization within breast tumors maintained by cancer stem-like cells (CSCs). Accordingly, CSCs are a subpopulation of cancer cells with capacity for self-renewal, differentiation and tumor initiation. These cells can be isolated through the phenotypic markers CD44+/CD24-, expression of ALDH1 and an ability to form nonadherent, multicellular spheres in vitro. However, controversies to describe the stem cell model exist; it is unclear whether the tumorigenicity of CSCs in vivo is solely a proxy for a certain genotype. Moreover, in vivo evidence is lacking to fully define the reversibility of CSC differentiation.

Methods

In order to answer these questions, we undertook exome sequencing of CSCs from 12 breast cancer patients, along with paired primary tumor samples. As suggested by stem classical cell biology, we assumed that the number of mutations in the CSC subpopulation should be lower and distinct compared to the differentiated tumor cells with higher proliferation.

Results

Our analysis revealed that the majority of somatic mutations are shared between CSCs and bulk primary tumor, with similar frequencies in the two.

Conclusions

The data presented here exclude the possibility that CSCs are only a phenotypic consequence of certain somatic mutations, that is a distinct and non-reversible population of cells. In addition, our results imply that CSCs must be a population of cells that can dynamically switch from differentiated tumor cells, and vice versa. This finding increases our understanding of CSC function in tumor heterogeneity and the importance of identifying drugs to counter de-differentiation rather than targeting CSCs.     

干细胞niche与肿瘤干细胞产生和发展的关系

肿瘤干细胞学说认为大部分肿瘤来源于肿瘤干细胞。肿瘤干细胞与正常干细胞一样具有自我更新能力,能够产生肿瘤组织团块中的各种增殖和分化的细胞。肿瘤干细胞可能来源于正常干细胞或分化细胞。干细胞niche是干细胞生存的微环境,通过提供抑制细胞增殖和生长的信号来维持干细胞于静止状态。干细胞niche功能异常会导致niche的数量增加,以及干细胞功能异常和数量增加。肿瘤干细胞可能在异常的niche中存活,打破这种异常的niche就会削弱肿瘤干细胞的自我更新,从而抑制肿瘤的生长。靶向肿瘤干细胞异常微环境的治疗策略可能是癌症治疗的一个方向。