Dose fusion and efficacy evaluation of different radical radiotherapy doses for cervical cancer

BackgroundThe recommended external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) dose for cervical cancer is 40–50 Gy, but there is no consensus. In this study, 45-Gy and 50.4-Gy treatment groups were compared for fused doses to target tumor areas and organs at risk (OARs), clinical efficacy, and quality of life.MethodsSeventy-nine cases receiving radical radiotherapy within the past 3 years were retrospectively analyzed. EBRT and three-dimensional brachytherapy dose fusion values were calculated for target areas and OARs using Elastix V5.0. Clinical efficacy was assessed using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), adverse events using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.03 (CTCAE4.03), and quality of life using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30).ResultsMinimum fused dose delivered to 90% of the high-risk clinical target volume (HRCTV D90) did not differ significantly between 45-Gy and 50.4-Gy groups, whereas D2cc values of rectum and bladder (OARs) were significantly lower in the 45-Gy group (both p < 0.05). Further analysis showed that these D2cc differences resulted primarily from EBRT. No grade III–IV adverse events were observed in either group during follow up. Short-term clinical efficacy, adverse events, and EORTC QLQ-C30 functional and symptom scales also did not differ significantly between groups (all p > 0.05). However, quality of life was markedly higher in the 45-Gy group (p < 0.05).ConclusionAppropriate EBRT dose reduction can reduce OAR irradiation without compromising total target area dose or clinical efficacy. Dose fusion can facilitate the judicious choice of EBRT to limit OAR exposure, reduce adverse events, and enhance the quality of life.     

Deformable image registration–based contour propagation yields clinically acceptable plans for MRI-based cervical cancer brachytherapy planning

PurposeTo study the dosimetric impact of deformable image registration–based contour propagation on MRI-based cervical cancer brachytherapy planning.Methods and MaterialsHigh-risk clinical target volume (HRCTV) and organ-at-risk (OAR) contours were delineated on MR images of 10 patients who underwent ring and tandem brachytherapy. A second set of contours were propagated using a commercially available deformable registration algorithm. “Manual-contour” and “propagated-contour” plans were optimized to achieve a maximum dose to the most minimally exposed 90% of the volume (D₉₀) (%) of 6 Gy/fraction, respecting minimum dose to the most exposed 2cc of the volume (D_2cc) OAR constraints of 5.25 Gy and 4.2 Gy/fraction for bladder and rectum/sigmoid (86.5 and 73.4 Gy equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions [EQD₂] for external beam radiotherapy [EBRT] + brachytherapy, respectively). Plans were compared using geometric and dosimetric (total dose [EQD₂] EBRT + brachytherapy) parameters.ResultsThe differences between the manual- and propagated-contour plans with respect to the HRCTV D₉₀ and bladder, rectum, and sigmoid D_2cc were not statistically significant (per-fraction basis). For the EBRT + brachytherapy course, the D_2cc delivered to the manually contoured OARs by the propagated-contour plans ranging 98–107%, 95–105%, and 92–108% of the dose delivered by the manual-contour plans (max 90.4, 70.3, and 75.4 Gy for the bladder, rectum, and sigmoid, respectively). The HRCTV dose in the propagated-contour plans was 97–103% of the dose in the manual-contour plans (maximum difference 2.92 Gy). Increased bladder filling resulted in increased bladder dose in manual- and propagated-contour plans.ConclusionsWhen deformable image registration–propagated contours are used for cervical brachytherapy planning, the HRCTV dose is similar to the dose delivered by manual-contour plans and the doses delivered to the OARs are clinically acceptable, suggesting that our algorithm can replace manual contouring for appropriately selected cases that lack major interfractional anatomical changes.     

Evaluation of intrafraction motion of the organs at risk in image-based brachytherapy of cervical cancer

Purpose/IntroductionTo assess the variation in the doses received by the organs at risk (OARs) that can occur during treatment planning of cervical cancer by image-based brachytherapy.Methods and MaterialsAfter intracavitary application, two sets of images—CT and MRI—were obtained. The two sets of images were fused together with respect to the applicator. Contouring was done separately on CT and MR images. Dose received by the OARs on CT images with respect to the plans made on the MR images was estimated and compared with those on the MR images.ResultsAlthough there was always a difference between the dose received by the OARs based on the CT and MRI contours, it was not significant for the bladder and rectum; 2 cc doses differed by 0.49 Gy (±0.44) p = 0.28 for the bladder and 0.30 Gy (±0.29) p = 0.16 for the rectum. The 1 cc and 0.1 cc differences were also not significant. However for the sigmoid colon, there was significant intrafraction variation in the 2 cc doses 0.61 (±0.6) p = 0.001, 1 cc doses 0.73 (±0.67) Gy p = 0.00, and 0.1 cc dose 0.97 (±0.93) Gy p = 0.009.ConclusionsThe variation in the doses to the OARs must be considered while weighing target coverage against overdose to the OARs. Although not significant for the bladder and rectum, it was significant for the sigmoid colon. Estimated doses to OARs on the planning system may not be the same dose delivered at the time of treatment.     

三种局部补量技术在晚期宫颈癌放疗中的应用研究

目的 探讨三维腔内联合组织间插植（IC/IS BT）、三维腔内（ICBT）联合调强 （ICBT+IMRT）以及单纯IMRT技术在局部晚期宫颈癌治疗中的剂量学差异。方法 选取16例接受三维近距离治疗的局部晚期宫颈癌患者,在原IC/IS BT计划的基础上分别设计ICBT+IMRT和单纯 IMRT计划,研究3种计划中肿瘤靶区和危及器官（OARs）的剂量学差异。结果 共制定75个后装治疗计划,其中IC/IS BT、ICBT+IMRT和单纯 IMRT各25个。 ICBT+IMRT与IC/IS BT计划的靶区体积剂量D₉₀差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）, OARs的剂量比较低。单纯IMRT计划中OARs受量相对较大,且V₆₀明显偏高（与IC/IS BT相比,t=6.77、10.37、4.61、2.83,P<0.05）。结论 ICBT+IMRT计划的肿瘤靶区剂量覆盖较好且OARs受剂量低,可以作为IC/IS BT替代治疗手段。单纯 IMRT技术虽然靶区覆盖度较好,但OARs保护差,不适用于晚期宫颈癌的局部补量治疗。     

Variable impact of intracavitary brachytherapy fractionation schedule on biologically effective dose to organs at risk in patients with cervical cancer

PurposeTo determine the effect of intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) fractionation schedule on biologically effective dose to organs at risk.Methods and MaterialsWe reviewed records from 26 patients who had CT imaging during ICBT for International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IB2-IVA cervical cancer. Using α/β = 10, we calculated hypothetical nominal doses to achieve a biologically effective dose at 2 Gy per fraction (EQD2_α/β=10) of 40 Gy to Point A for high-dose-rate ICBT with 1–15 fractions. Corresponding minimum EQD2_α/β=3s to the maximally irradiated 2 cc of rectum, bladder, and sigmoid were calculated for each fractionation scheme and added to EQD2_α/β=3 from external beam radiotherapy. Total EQD2_α/β=3s were compared with American Brachytherapy Society suggested dose constraints (rectum/sigmoid, ≤75 Gy; bladder, ≤90 Gy).ResultsExcept for rectal EQD2_α/β=3 in three patients, the rectal, bladder, and sigmoid EQD2_α/β=3s decreased with increasing fractionation in all patients. Although the total rectal EQD2_α/β=3s were less than the American Brachytherapy Society rectal dose constraint in all patients at all fractionation schedules, the total bladder EQD2_α/β=3s routinely exceeded the bladder dose constraint, even at maximum fractionation. By contrast, increasing fractionation decreased the number of patients with doses exceeding the sigmoid dose constraint by 48%.ConclusionsThe relationship between ICBT fractionation schedule and relative EQD2_α/β=3s to rectum, bladder, and sigmoid depends on individual anatomy. Fractionation optimization can improve therapeutic ratios by minimizing the risk or severity of toxic effects. For patients in whom many fractions optimize the therapeutic ratio, low-dose-rate or pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy may be preferred.     

The dosimetric advantages of perirectal hydrogel spacer in men with localized prostate cancer undergoing stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR)

To evaluate the dosimetric differences for patients receiving a perirectal hydrogel spacer (PR-HS) using SpaceOAR undergoing stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for localized prostate cancer with the CyberKnife VSI system. Gold fiducial markers and a PR-HS was inserted in 22 consecutive patients with histologically confirmed localized prostate cancer. For planning comparison, dosimetry from the clinical plans was compared against replans based on a simulated rectum volume designed to recreate a clinically appropriate spacer-less anatomy for each patient. Both sets were planned to 36.25 Gy in 5 fractions using the treatment planning system associated with the CyberKnife VSI system. The aim was to ensure equivalent target coverage for both plans and to evaluate doses to the organs-at-risk (OARs): rectum, bladder and penile bulb. The median PR-HS implant volume was 11.2 cc (range 8.8 to 14.9 cc). The maximal median perirectal separation was 15.5 mm (10.5 to 20.7 mm). Statistically significant reductions were noted for the 3 OARs, with no statistically significant difference in planning target volumes or clinical target volume coverage. All rectal dose constraints were significantly improved in the PR-HS plans with a percentage dose difference of at least 24% (rectum V_18.1Gy (%)) to 60.5% (rectum V_36Gy (cc)). The bladder and penile bulb dose constraints parameters were also significantly improved: the bladder V_37Gy was reduced by 17.1%, V_18.1Gy was reduced by 4.2%; the penile bulb D_50% was reduced by 7.7%. The use of PR-HS was able to significantly reduce planned dose to the rectum, bladder and penile bulb with SABR techniques associated with the CyberKnife VSI system.     

形变配准在宫颈癌近距离放疗分次间剂量评估中的可行性研究

目的:比较近距离放疗分次间靶区和正常组织在形变配准(DIR)和简单累加剂量体积直方图(DVH)情况下,累积剂量的剂量学差异,分析在宫颈癌三维近距离放疗计划中,形变配准技术应用于靶区和正常组织剂量评估的可行性。方法:回顾性选取13例宫颈癌近距离放疗病例,每个病例均进行了4次CT定位的近距离放疗。对每个病例的4次CT进行形...     

Risk factors for urethral stricture following external beam radiotherapy and HDR brachytherapy for prostate cancer

PurposeA potential late side effect of high-dose-rate (HDR) prostate brachytherapy combined with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) is urethral stricture. The purpose of this study was to evaluate dosimetric parameters possibly contributing to stricture development, including dose to bladder base and D2cc(Gy) within 10 mm of prostatic urethra (D2cc _10 mm), which has, so far, not been reported in the literature.Methods and MaterialsPatients developing urethral stricture, and matched controls, were identified from a prospective database of those receiving 46 Gy in 23 fractions of EBRT, followed by a single 15 Gy HDR brachytherapy dose. Patients had locally advanced, high- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Brachytherapy treatment planning parameters (planning target volume (PTV) size (cm ³), V110(%) _{bladder base}, D2cc _10mm, number of HDR catheters, number of source dwell positions, and total source dwell time within 10 mm of the prostatic urethra) were analyzed to determine potential risk factors for urethral stricture.ResultsSeventy-two patients were treated, 22 of whom developed a urethral stricture. Univariate logistic regression performed on the planning parameters identified increased PTV size and D2cc _10 mm, with decreased V110(%) _{bladder base} as risk factors for stricture formation.ConclusionsIt is suggested that PTV size, V110(%) _{bladder base}, and D2cc _10mm are predictive of urethral stricture formation following EBRT and brachytherapy to the prostate. This study demonstrates the importance of minimizing high dwell times and hot spots close to organs at risk and also the correction of any craniocaudal movement of catheters to avoid potential hot spots in the bulbomembranous urethra where there may be increased dose sensitivity.     

Comparison of clinical outcomes achieved with image-guided adaptive brachytherapy for cervix cancer using CT or transabdominal ultrasound

PurposeThis study aimed to evaluate retrospectively the treatment results when using various image-guided adaptive brachytherapy treatments for cervical cancer treated by radical radiotherapy.Methods and MaterialsFrom 2014 to 2017, 188 patients with cervical carcinoma were treated by whole pelvic radiotherapy plus four fractions of image-guided brachytherapy. Eight patients were excluded because of missing data. Consequently, 180 patients were analyzed. Of 180 patients, 92 were treated by CT-based brachytherapy (CT-BT), and transabdominal ultrasound–based brachytherapy (TAUS-BT) was used to treat another group. The treatment results and toxicity outcomes were evaluated by comparing the image-guidance techniques.ResultsThe mean follow-up time was 32 months (interquartile range 29.5–42 months). The mean age was 57 years (interquartile range from 50 to 65 years). In the CT-BT group, the mean cumulative doses to high-risk clinical target volume, bladder, rectum, and sigmoid were 87.2 Gy, 84.0 Gy, 68.8 Gy, and 69.8 Gy, respectively. In the TAUS-BT group, the mean cumulative doses to the cervix reference, bladder, and rectum points were 84.0 Gy, 65.5 Gy, and 74.0 Gy, respectively. There were no differences in the 2-year local control rate (p = 0.88) and disease-free survival rate (p = 0.34) in both groups. No difference in gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicity was observed in both groups, but there was higher vaginal toxicity in the TAUS-BT group compared with the CT-BT group (p = 0.03).ConclusionsNo difference in treatment results was observed between CT-based and TAUS-based approaches. However, TAUS-BT had higher vaginal toxicity in our retrospective analysis.     

Long-term effectiveness and safety of image-based,transperineal combined intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy in treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer

PurposeThe aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of image-based combined intracavitary-interstitial brachytherapy (IC-ISBT) using a transperineal template in locally advanced cervical cancer treatment.Methods and MaterialsA total of 94 patients of cervical cancer stage IIB-IVA underwent image-based transperineal interstitial brachytherapy without tandem (ISBT) or with tandem (IC-ISBT) between June 2008 and June 2018 at our institution. After pelvic chemoradiation, 42 patients underwent ISBT and 52 IC-ISBT. Dosimetric data, clinical response, and toxicity records of these patients were reviewed.ResultsClinical stage distribution was as follows: IIB: 22.4% (21), IIIA: 10.6% (10), IIIB: 56.4% (53), and IVA: 10.6% (10). Mean high-risk clinical target volume was 75.72 cc, and mean cumulative equivalent of 2 Gy per fraction for high-risk clinical target volume was 81 Gy. The median followup was 35.5 months. Overall 3- and 5-year local control, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were 84% and 84%, 69.1% and 62.9%, and 80.9% and 71.5%, respectively. Local control (90.4% vs. 76.2%; p = 0.048) and DFS (78.8% vs. 57.1%; p = 0.04) were significantly better in the patients of IC-ISBT arm. IC-ISBT (hazard ratio: 0.763; 95% confidence interval 0.217, 1.38; p = 0.046) and D90 dose >85 Gy (hazard ratio: 0.957; 95% confidence interval 0.927, 1.07; p = 0.037) were predictors of better DFS on univariate analysis. Overall survival was not affected significantly by any of the factors. Grade 3 and 4 late complications were recorded in 3.2% (3) of patients and were similar in both arms (p = 0.86). However, the mean rectum 2 cc dose was significantly lower in the IC-ISBT arm (p = 0.038).ConclusionsCombined IC-ISBT is a safe and effective approach to treat ICBT unsuitable cases. It integrates the benefits of ICBT to the adaptability of ISBT around various targets and should be practiced whenever feasible to provide superior outcomes in locally advanced cervical cancer.     

宫颈癌二维近距离后装治疗中危及器官参考点剂量与三维体积剂量的相关性研究

目的 利用宫颈癌二维近距离后装治疗中危及器官（OARs）点剂量预测其三维体积剂量,评估在特定条件下,二维计划OARs体积剂量能否满足三维后装剂量限值要求。方法 回顾性分析基于CT图像的10例宫颈癌患者近距离后装治疗计划,将处方参考点剂量定为600 cGy,膀胱和直肠参考点剂量<360 cGy,设计并优化得到二维后装治疗计划。采用Pearson相关分析法对膀胱、直肠参考点剂量及OARs体积受量做相关性分析,利用线性回归方法得出膀胱、直肠参考点与其体积剂量的线性方程。结果 膀胱、直肠参考点剂量分别与其D_{1 cm³}、D_{2 cm³}、D_{5 cm³}和平均剂量显著正相关（r=0.559~0.668,P<0.05）;膀胱、直肠参考点剂量分别是其D_{2 cm³}的1.404和1.181倍;内外照射完成后膀胱、直肠D_{2 cm³}的相当于200 cGy分次等效生物剂量（EQD2）分别为8 410.0和6 827.0 cGy,均低于二者体积剂量限值。结论 利用膀胱、直肠参考点剂量能在一定程度上预测其体积剂量,对于满足膀胱、直肠参考点剂量低于处方剂量60%二维近距离后装计划,可将膀胱、直肠体积受量控制在相对安全的剂量范围内。而由于缺乏对小肠、乙状结肠剂量检测,二维后装计划在临床使用上仍然具有很大局限性。     

Paracervical blocks facilitate timely brachytherapy amidst COVID-19

PurposeThe COVID-19 pandemic presents serious challenges for brachytherapists, and in the time-sensitive case of locally advanced cervical cancer, the need for curative brachytherapy (BT) is critical for survival. Given the high-volume of locally advanced cervical cancer in our safety-net hospital, we developed a strategy in close collaboration with our gynecology oncology and anesthesia colleagues to allow for completely clinic-based intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT).Methods and MaterialsThis technical report will highlight our experience with the use of paracervical blocks (PCBs) and oral multimodal analgesia (MMA) for appropriately selected cervical ICBT cases, allowing for completely clinic-based treatment.Results18 of 19 (95%) screened patients were eligible for in-clinic ICBT. The excluded patient had significant vaginal fibrosis. 38 of 39 intracavitary implants were successfully transitioned for entirely in-clinic treatment utilizing PCBs and oral MMA (97% success rate). One case was aborted due to inadequate analgesia secondary to a significantly delayed case start time (PO medication effect diminished). 95% of patients reported no pain at the conclusion of the procedure. The median (IQR) D_2cc for rectum and bladder were 64.8 (58.6–70.2) Gy and 84.1 (70.9–89.4) Gy, respectively. Median (IQR) CTV high-risk D₉₀ was 88.0 (85.6–89.8) Gy.ConclusionsIn a multidisciplinary effort, we have successfully transitioned many ICBT cases to the clinic with the use of PCB local anesthesia and oral multimodality therapy in direct response to the current pandemic, thereby mitigating exposure risk to patients and staff as well as reducing overall health care burden.     

Reducing dose to rectum by placement of a rectum-emptying tube in cervical cancer patients treated with brachytherapy

PURPOSEOnly scarce data are available on the possibility to reduce rectal dose by controlling rectum filling before HDR (high dose rate) IGABT (image-guided adaptive brachytherapy) in LACC (locally advanced cervical carcinoma) patients. We compared dosimetric outcomes before and after the evacuation of gasses using a rectum emptying tube.METHODS AND MATERIALSixty CT (computed tomography) scans from 30 consecutive patients with cancer of the cervix undergoing HDR IGABT after EBRT were reviewed. Patients who underwent at least one gas evacuation were included in the analysis. The three-dimensional dosimetric data of the dosimetric plan performed before and after gas evacuation were compared. Primary endpoint was the difference between D2cc of the rectum before and after the procedure. Expected probability of grade 2–4 overall rectum morbidity was assessed using a probit model from the prospective multicenter EMBRACE study.RESULTSThirty five (58.3%) CT scans from 23 patients (76.7%) requiring gas evacuation were analysed. The mean rectum volume, before and after gas evacuation, was 123.1 cc (sd, ± 60.4) and 66.4 cc (sd, ± 34.8), respectively. For each patient, the volume of the rectum after gas evacuation was lower than before. No major complication occurred during and after the procedure. After gas evacuation, a significant reduction in rectal dose per fraction was observed, on average -4.3 Gy (-38.4%, p < 0.001) for D0.1cc and -1.9 Gy (-30.6%, p < 0.001) for D2cc. Estimated mean probability to develop a grade 2–4 rectum morbidity was significantly lower after gas evacuation, 6.9% (sd,± 1.94) versus 9.5% (sd,± 3.17), p < 0.001.CONCLUSIONGas evacuation using a rectal emptying tube in selected LACC patients treated with HDR BT after chemoradiotherapy, allowed a substantial reduction in the dose to the rectum. Such procedure could be of particular interest when a dose escalation strategy is being considered.     

基于四分位距值的调强放疗计划剂量体积直方图分析

目的 提出一种基于四分位距值的调强放射治疗（IMRT）计划靶区及危及器官剂量体积直方图（DVH）差异分析方法。方法 回顾分析22例宫颈癌IMRT计划,将靶区和危及器官（膀胱、直肠和左右股骨头）5组DVH曲线从Pinnacle³计划系统中导出,对每组DVH曲线求出平均DVH曲线和四分位距值曲线。结果 计划靶区DVH在54.03 Gy处差异最大,四分位距值为6.95%,处方剂量包绕的靶区体积为（96.43±1.63）%。膀胱DVH在17.24 Gy处差异最大,四分位距值为14.62%,V₄₀和V₃₀分别为（32.79±7.06）% 和（56.47±9.94）%。直肠DVH在35.92 Gy处差异最大,四分位距值为19.94%,V₄₀和V₃₀分别为（30.17±10.80）%和（58.16±11.99）%。膀胱与直肠的四分位距值差异有统计学意义（z=-6.59, P<0.05）。左侧股骨头DVH在16.06 Gy处差异最大,四分位距值为31.47%。右侧股骨头DVH在17.47 Gy处差异最大,四分位距值为32.82%,左右股骨头间的四分位距值间差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。结论 四分位距值曲线可以分析靶区和危及器官DVH曲线的变化趋势,为自动计划优化参数设置提供指导。     

Evaluation of dose differences between intracavitary applicators for cervical brachytherapy using knowledge-based models

PURPOSECurrently, there is a lack of patient-specific tools to guide brachytherapy planning and applicator choice for cervical cancer. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of organ-at-risk (OAR) dose predictions using knowledge-based intracavitary models, and the use of these models and clinical data to determine the dosimetric differences of tandem-and-ring (T&R) and tandem-and-ovoids (T&O) applicators.MATERIALS AND METHODSKnowledge-based models, which predict organ D_2cc, were trained on 77/75 cases and validated on 32/38 for T&R/T&O applicators. Model performance was quantified using ΔD_2cc=D_2cc,actual–D_{2cc,predicted}, with standard deviation (σ(ΔD_2cc)) representing precision. Model-predicted applicator dose differences were determined by applying T&O models to T&R cases, and vice versa, and compared to clinically-achieved D_2cc differences. Applicator differences were assessed using a Student's t-test (p < 0.05 significant).RESULTSValidation T&O/T&R model precision was 0.65/0.55 Gy, 0.55/0.38 Gy, and 0.43/0.60 Gy for bladder, rectum and sigmoid, respectively, and similar to training. When applying T&O/T&R models to T&R/T&O cases, bladder, rectum and sigmoid D_2cc values in EQD2 were on average 5.69/2.62 Gy, 7.31/6.15 Gy and 3.65/0.69 Gy lower for T&R, with similar HRCTV volume and coverage. Clinical data also showed lower T&R OAR doses, with mean EQD2 D_2cc deviations of 0.61 Gy, 7.96 Gy (p < 0.01) and 5.86 Gy (p < 0.01) for bladder, rectum and sigmoid.CONCLUSIONSAccurate knowledge-based dose prediction models were developed for two common intracavitary applicators. These models could be beneficial for standardizing and improving the quality of brachytherapy plans. Both models and clinical data suggest that significant OAR sparing can be achieved with T&R over T&O applicators, particularly for the rectum.     

Development of an indigenous low-cost multichannel cylinder applicator for vaginal tumors

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to report our experience regarding the development of a low-cost multichannel vaginal cylinder applicator for superficial and recurrent vaginal tumors.Methods and MaterialsThe applicator mold was created by applying heated wax sheets in layers around a plastic tube. Interstitial stainless-steel needles were placed at equal distance around the mold surface to create multiple channels for treatment. Two plans were created using CT images for a patient with a recurrent tumor over the posterior vaginal wall for comparing single-channel and multichannel cylinder dosimetry. The doses received by the target (high risk clinical target volume) and organs at risk (OARs) were computed using dose–volume histograms.ResultsThere was no significant difference in terms of the prescribed dose delivered to high risk clinical target volume between the two plans. The volume of the target receiving 150 and 200 percent (V₁₅₀ and V₂₀₀) dose was higher in the multichannel cylinder plan than the single-channel cylinder plan. In terms of doses to the OARs, there was no significant difference between the rectum doses (D2cc rectum). There was a significant reduction in the dose to the bladder (D2cc bladder), urethra (D0.1cc urethra), and uninvolved vagina (D2cc uninvolved vagina).ConclusionsMultichannel vaginal cylinders reduce doses to the OARs as compared with the single-channel vaginal cylinder in superficial vaginal lesions limited to the wall of the vagina. Their use is limited by the cost of the applicator. Our low-cost multichannel vaginal cylinder can be used as a reliable alternative in such situations.     

Characterization of combined intracavitary/interstitial brachytherapy including oblique needles in locally advanced cervix cancer

PURPOSETo characterize and report on dosimetric outcomes of image guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT) using intracavitary and interstitial (IC/IS) applicators including oblique needles (O-needles) in locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC).METHODS AND MATERIALSTwenty LACC patients treated with radio-chemotherapy and offered IC/IS-IGABT including O-needles were analyzed. An in-house 3D-printed vaginal template was used to steer the needles parallel and obliquely in relation to the tandem, supplemented with free-hand needles if needed. Implant characteristics and loading patterns were analyzed. Using the equivalent dose in 2Gy-fractions (EQD2) concept, cumulative (EBRT+BT) V85, V75, V60Gy, targets/OARs doses and high dose volumes (150%, 200% and 300% (100% = 85 Gy EQD2₁₀)) were evaluated.RESULTSMedian(range) tumor width at diagnosis was 5.5(3.6; 7.5)cm; CTV_HR volume was 45(23; 136)cm³ with maximum distance from tandem to CTV_HR border of 3.4(2.5; 4.8)cm. T-stage distribution was IIB/III/IVA in 6(30%)/9(45%)/5(25%) of patients. At BT, 13(65%) patients had distal parametrial/pelvic wall infiltration. Median(range) number of needles per patient was 11(8–18). Average distribution of intrauterine, vaginal and interstitial dwell times were 31%, 25% and 44%, respectively. Median(range) dwell-time per dwell position was 11(2–127)% of average point-A based standard loading. Median V_85Gy/V_150%/V_200%/V_300% were 85(38; 171)/41(21; 93)/22(12; 41)/7(4; 19) cm³; CTV_HR D_90% was 93(83; 97)Gy EQD2₁₀; bladder/rectum/sigmoid/bowel D_2cm3 were 78(64; 104)/65(52; 76)/59(53; 69)/61(47; 76)Gy EQD2₃.CONCLUSIONSThe use of O-needles in patients with large and/or unfavorable tumors resulted in excellent target coverage and OARs sparing. Intrauterine and vaginal loadings were reduced compared to standard loading and almost half of the loading was shifted into IS needles. This was achieved with gentle loading in the majority of dwell positions.