An Exploration of Trifluridine/Tipiracil Monotherapy and in Combination With Bevacizumab or Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Real-World Study

BackgroundTrifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) has achieved modest efficacy in the late-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. The present study aimed to explore the clinical efficacy and drug toxicities of TAS-102 for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in real-world clinical setting.MethodsFrom October 2020 to February 2022, patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who failed from 2 or more lines of prior therapy and treated with TAS-102 monotherapy, in combination with bevacizumab or immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) were analyzed. The evaluation indicators were progression free survival (PFS), objective response rate , disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS) and drug toxicities.ResultsA total of 70 patients were enrolled. The objective response rate and DCR were 1.4% and 68.6%. The median PFS and OS were 6.0 (95% CI: 4.1-7.9) and 10.0 (95% CI: 8.3-11.7) months. Compared with TAS-102 monotherapy and TAS-102 plus ICIs, TAS-102 plus bevacizumab obtained superior DCR (75.9% vs. 50% vs. 40%, P = .047), PFS (6.3m vs. 3.0 m vs. 3.0 m, P = .041) and OS (12.0 m vs. 6.5 m vs. 6.0m, P = .013). Patients without prior regorafenib or fruquintinib therapy obtained better median PFS (6.3 vs. 4.3 m, P = .031) and OS (NR vs. 9.0 m, P = .036). Other indicators, including age, tumor site, KRAS status and use of fluoropyrimidine as last regimen before TAS-102, did not affect the clinical efficacy of TAS-102. The most frequent adverse events were leukopenia, neutropenia, anemia, fatigue, nausea, and vomiting.ConclusionIn real-world clinical setting, TAS-102 showed consistent clinical efficacy and manageable safety with previous prospective clinical studies. Compared with monotherapy and TAS-102 plus ICIs, TAS-102 plus bevacizumab demonstrated better clinical efficacy for metastatic colorectal cancer.     

Vinorelbine After Prior Treatment With Eribulin for Advanced Breast Cancer: A Single-Centre Experience Suggesting Cross-Resistance

IntroductionThe tubulin inhibitor, eribulin, improves survival for previously treated advanced breast cancer (ABC) compared to chemotherapy of physician's choice, including vinorelbine, an older anti-tubulin. Vinorelbine is commonly still used after eribulin, but potentially risks cross-resistance and its efficacy in this setting is unproven.Materials and MethodsA retrospective analysis of all patients who received vinorelbine after prior eribulin (VAE) 2011-2015 and a parallel cohort of consecutive patients who received vinorelbine without prior eribulin (VWE) for previously treated ABC between 2005 and 2011. Patient demographics, histopathological features, treatment duration and responses were recorded. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival from date of first vinorelbine for each cohort. Secondary endpoints included radiological response rate, and overall survival (OS).ResultsThirty-five VAE and 103 VWE patients were identified, all female, 71.4% and 78.6% were ER positive/HER2 negative, 8.6% and 6.8% HER2 positive, and 20.0% and 14.6% triple negative for VAE and VWE cohorts, respectively. The median number of lines of chemotherapy lines prior to vinorelbine was 4 (range 2-6) and 2 (range 0-4), respectively. Fifteen VAE patients (42.9%) received ≥1 line of chemotherapy between eribulin and vinorelbine. VAE and WWE Patients received a median of 3 cycles of vinorelbine (range 1-9 and 1-12, respectively). The median progression-free survival for VAE patients was 2.1 months and 2.0 months for VWE patients. No VAE patients were progression-free at 24 weeks, compared to 15.5% of VWE patients. Median OS from commencing vinorelbine was 4.3 months for VAE and 6.4 months for VWE patients.ConclusionVinorelbine was of limited benefit after prior eribulin in our study, suggesting cross-resistance. Even without prior eribulin, only 15% of patients experienced clinical benefit from vinorelbine monotherapy.     

Margetuximab Versus Trastuzumab in Patients With Advanced Breast Cancer: A Cost-effectiveness Analysis

BackgroundIn the international, randomized, open-label, phase III study SOPHIA trial, margetuximab plus chemotherapy showed improved progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) compared with trastuzumab plus chemotherapy. This study aimed to investigate whether margetuximab plus chemotherapy is cost-effective compared with trastuzumab plus chemotherapy in pretreated patients with ERBB2-positive advanced breast cancer.Materials and MethodsThe clinical data for this model was derived from the SOPHIA trial. Costs and utility were either derived from the standard fee database or extracted from previously published literature. A three-state Markov model was developed to simulate the disease process of patients with advanced breast cancer. One-way sensitivity analyses were conducted to investigate the impact of variables in the analysis model. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed based on 10,000 Monte-Carlo simulations. A subgroup analysis was performed to test whether margetuximab is cost-effective in CD16A-158F allele carriers.ResultsMargetuximab plus chemotherapy provided an incremental 0.04 QALYs with an incremental cost of $66,109.78, compared with the trastuzumab plus chemotherapy, resulting in the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $1,486,442.35/QALY, which exceeded the willingness to pay (WTP) threshold. While in the CD16A-158F allele carriers subgroup, the ICER decreased to $592,669.73/QALY. The variance of the utility of PFS state, costs of margetuximab, and utility of progressive disease state were the most influential factors in the sensitivity analysis.ConclusionUnder current WTP threshold, margetuximab plus chemotherapy is not cost-effective compared with trastuzumab plus chemotherapy in pretreated patients with ERBB2-positive advanced breast cancer. Selecting CD16A-158F allele carriers might be a considerable option to optimize the cost-effectiveness of margetuximab.     

Multimodal Management of Testicular Mesothelioma - A Retrospective Analysis From a Tertiary Cancer Care Centre

The main modality of management of paratesticular mesothelioma remains orchiectomy while the use of adjuvant chemotherapy has not yet been explored. We aim to analyse the outcome of the multimodal management protocol in testicular mesothelioma We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients registered and treated for testicular mesothelioma between 2009 and 2019 in an oncology tertiary care hospital. Patients presenting with nodal, metastatic disease were treated with adjuvant, palliative chemotherapy respectively and their response to treatment was periodically monitored. Eight patients (3 early, 1 nodal, 4 metastatic) with median age of 58 years was included in the study. Patients who had limited (early, nodal) disease (n = 4) had overall survival ranging from 20 to 140 months while metastatic disease (n = 4) had poor outcomes with overall survival ranging from 2 to 13 months. Surgery remains to be an important modality of therapy that improves the local control and overall outcomes and the quality of life even in patients with metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis. Adjuvant chemotherapy might play a role in effective management of locoregional disease. The performance status, the extent of disease at the time of presentation are the important prognostic factors in deciding the outcome of the disease management.     

Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy With Capecitabine With or Without Temozolomide in Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Prospective,Randomised Phase II Study Stratified by O6-Methylguanine DNA Methyltransferase Status: KCSG-CO17-02

AimsTo evaluate the clinical efficacy of adding temozolomide (TMZ) to preoperative capecitabine (CAP)-based chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) and validate O⁶-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) methylation status as a predictive marker for TMZ combined regimens.Materials and methodsLARC patients with clinical stage II (cT3-4N0) or III (cT_anyN+) disease were enrolled. They were stratified into unmethylated MGMT (uMGMT) and methylated MGMT (mMGMT) groups by methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction before randomisation and were then randomly assigned (1:1) to one of four treatment arms: uMGMT/CAP (arm A), uMGMT/TMZ + CAP (arm B), mMGMT/CAP (arm C) and mMGMT/TMZ + CAP (arm D). The primary end point was the pathological complete response (pCR) rate.ResultsBetween November 2017 and July 2020, 64 patients were randomised. Slow accrual caused early study termination. After excluding four ineligible patients, 60 were included in the full analysis set. The pCR rate was 15.0% (9/60), 0%, 14.3%, 18.8% and 26.7% for the entire cohort, arms A, B, C and D, respectively (P = 0.0498 between arms A and D). The pCR rate was 9.7% in the CAP group (arms A + C), 20.7% in the TMZ + CAP group (arms B + D), 6.9% in the uMGMT group (arms A + B) and 22.6% in the mMGMT group (arms C + D). Grade 1–2 nausea or vomiting was significantly more frequent in the TMZ + CAP treatment groups (arms B + D) than in the CAP treatment groups (arms A + C, P < 0.001) with no difference in grade 3 adverse events. There were no grade 4 or 5 adverse events.ConclusionThe addition of TMZ to CAP-based chemoradiotherapy tended to improve pCR rates, particularly in those with mMGMT LARC. MGMT status may warrant further investigation as a predictive biomarker for chemotherapeutic agents and radiotherapy.     

Modified 5-Item Frailty Index Score as Prognostic Marker After Radical Cystectomy in Bladder Cancer

IntroductionA modified 5-item frailty index was recently developed as a predictor of patient comorbidity-based mortality and morbidity. We evaluate the association between preoperative modified 5-item frailty index score and prognosis after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer.Patients and MethodsIn this multicenter retrospective study, we calculated modified 5-item frailty index scores of the 238 patients that underwent radical cystectomy for bladder cancer between March 2009, and March 2018. The patients were classified into high frailty index score (≥ 2) or low frailty index score (≤ 1) groups for comparison of overall and cancer-specific survival between them. To evaluate the prognostic impact of the preoperative frailty index, we also performed Cox proportional regression analyses for overall, and cancer-specific survival.ResultsOf 238 patients, 53 patients were classified into the high frailty index score group and 185 patients into the low frailty index score group. Overall, 70 patients died of bladder cancer (29%), and 21 patients died of other causes (9%). The patients with high frailty index score had significantly lower rate of overall survival than those with low frailty index score (P < .01). On the other hand, there was no significant difference in cancer-specific survival rate between the 2 groups (P = .07). Multivariable Cox proportional hazard analysis revealed that high modified 5-item frailty index score was independently associated with poor overall survival (P = .01), but not with poor cancer-specific survival (P = .15).ConclusionHigh preoperative modified 5-item frailty index score could be a significant independent predictor of poor prognosis after radical cystectomy in patients with bladder cancer.     

Gene network Analysis Defines a Subgroup of Small Cell Lung Cancer patients With Short Survival

BackgroundSmall cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive tumor, and despite its sensitivity to chemotherapy and radiotherapy, patients usually have a short survival. There are no clinically relevant predictive factors of responses to therapies, and therapeutic options are still limited.Materials and MethodsClinical data and somatic mutations of genes included in the MSK-IMPACT panel were retrieved from cBioPortal for 108 SCLCs and analyzed to identify mutated gene networks. Results were validated in an independent cohort of 54 SCLCs, whose information was also available from cBioPortal.ResultsDifferent networks were observed in tumors of short and long survivors. Degree (K) and betweenness (B) are key features that characterize a gene in its network of related mutations. By comparing their B/K ratio, 2 signatures of mutated genes were identified, describing short (IL-7R, NTRK2, HNF-1A) and long survivors (NBN, PTPN-11, IRS-1, INPP-4A, PIK-3CG, HGF, LATS-2, SMARCA-4, FLT-3, EIF-4A2, SPEN, PAX-5, SH2-D1A, ARID-1A, HOXB-13, ERCC-4, FANCA, FH, FGFR-2, MST-1R, SMAD-4, DDR-2, IGF-1R, PIK-3CB). Patients with at least 1 mutated gene of the short signature had a worse median overall survival of 8 versus 28 months (P < .001). Patients with at least 1 mutated gene of the long signature had a better median overall survival of 39 versus 20 months (P = .004). The value of the short signature was further confirmed in an independent cohort of SCLCs.ConclusionThe networks of mutated genes could help subclassify SCLCs based on their somatic mutations and aid in identifying a subset of tumors with poor prognosis.     

Geriatric Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Patients in Low-risk Population: Omitting Chemotherapy Based on Nomogram

BackgroundConsidering old age and comorbidities, the actual benefit of chemotherapy in older patients with early triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) remains uncertain. We aimed to select appropriate patients who could avoid chemotherapy in this population.MethodsA total of 6482 patients more than 65 years old with T1-2N0-1M0 TNBC in 2010-2015 were extracted from SEER program. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify independent factors associated with chemotherapy usage. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier plots and log-rank tests. Independent prognostic factors were identified by multivariate Cox analysis. A nomogram predicting breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and a risk stratification model were constructed.ResultsA total of 3379 (52.13%) patients received chemotherapy while 3103 (47.87%) did not. Age, married status, grade, T-stage, N-stage, radiation and breast-conserving surgery (BCS) were significantly associated with chemotherapy usage (all P < .05). Chemotherapy significantly improved OS (HR = 0.606, P < .001) and BCSS (HR = 0.763, P = .006) in the entire population. A nomogram was built by incorporating independent risk factors (age, T-stage, N-stage, grade and radiation). Based on the score of the nomogram, the risk stratification model demonstrated that chemotherapy improved OS (P < .001) and BCSS (P < .001) of patients in the high-risk group (score >180), but not in the low-risk group (score ≤75).ConclusionChemotherapy is beneficial for geriatric patients with T1-2N0-1M0 TNBC in this study, and the risk stratification model indicates the feasibility of sparing chemotherapy in low-risk subgroup without sacrificing survival, providing clinicians tools to weigh the risk–benefit of chemotherapy and customize the individualized treatment accordingly.     

CAR T-Cells for the Treatment of Refractory or Relapsed Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Single-Center Retrospective Canadian Study

Background: Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cells are an important new third-line treatment option for large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). The objective response rates in pivotal early phase clinical trials with CAR T-cells were very promising. The objective of this study was to describe the efficacy results obtained with CAR T-cells infusions in our institution and to compare the toxicities of our cohort with those of pivotal trials and studies conducted in a real-life setting.Patients and Methods: Efficacy and safety data were retrospectively collected from 25 patients with LBCL treated with CAR T-cells therapy at CHU de Québec-Université Laval. A literature search was then performed to identify other efficacy or safety data from a real-life setting. Results: At 3 months post infusion, the objective response rate (ORR) in our population with tisagenlecleucel and axicabtagene-ciloleucel were 20% and 47%, respectively. Bulky disease was the only negative predictor of poor response at 3 months (0% vs. 53%, P = .03). Bulky disease was associated with a median PFS of 2 months compared to 5 months for non-bulky disease (P = .0009). Grade ≥ 3 hematological toxicities were greater in patients treated with axi-cel (60% vs. 20%, P = .048), without bone marrow involvement (55% vs. 0%, P =.046), without stage IV disease (72% vs. 21%, P =.02), with refractory disease (67% vs. 10%, P =.01) or having been affected by cytokine release syndrome (58% vs. 0%, P =.02).Conclusion: The poor response rate at 3 months after infusion in our cohort was influenced mainly by bulky disease. Further studies are needed to better characterize the loss of efficacy of CAR T-cells because the majority of patients will relapse over time.     

The Cardioprotective Effect of Vitamin D in Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Adjuvant Doxorubicin Based Chemotherapy

PurposeThe primary objective of this study was to investigate the potential protective effect of Vitamin D (Vit D) on DOX induced cardio toxicity (DIC) in early breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant DOX based chemotherapy (AC). The secondary objective was to investigate the anti–inflammatory effect of Vit D by measuring serum IL-6 and its correlation with cardio toxicity.MethodsThis study was carried out on 150 newly diagnosed women with breast cancer who were planned to receive four cycles of adjuvant AC chemotherapy regimen (60 mg/m² DOX and 600 mg/m² cyclophosphamide) every 21 days. Study patients were randomized 1:1 into a control group treated with AC and a Vit D group treated with AC plus 0.5 µg of Vit D (Bon One 0.5 µg) orally once daily during the whole treatment course. The cardio protective effect of Vit D was assessed by measuring serum levels of Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), cardiac troponin T (cTnT), and anti–inflammatory Interleukin 6 (IL-6) at baseline, and after 4 cycles of AC in all study patients.ResultsVit D supplementation in Vit D group patients was associated with a significant decrease (P < 0.001) in serum levels of LDH, cTnT, and IL-6 compared to the control group .ConclusionThe present work provides a promising clinical evidence to support the cardio protective effects of Vit D against DIC through attenuating the evoked pro-inflammatory cytokines induced by DOX.     

BCG Administration after Prior Radiation Treatment for Prostate Cancer

IntroductionProstate radiotherapy is associated with worse oncologic outcomes in patients with bladder cancer. The underlying mechanism is incompletely understood but is thought to be related to an altered microenvironment promoting tumorigenesis. However, there is a gap in the literature regarding how the effect of BCG varies according to prior radiotherapy in patients with non–muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). In this context, we sought to evaluate oncologic outcomes in NMIBC patients who have previously undergone prostate radiotherapy compared to patients with no prior history of pelvic radiotherapy.MethodsThis is a retrospective cohort study that includes all patients who received intravesical for NMIBC at our institution from 2001 to 2019. Patients were stratified into 3 cohorts: prior radiotherapy (RT), radical prostatectomy (RP), and no prostate cancer (No PCa). The outcomes of interest were recurrence at 1-year, progression to muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), and progression to metastatic disease. Comparisons were also made between cohorts with respect to elapsed time from radiation therapy. Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used for comparing continuous variables, while χ² and Fischer's exact tests were used to examine categorical variables.ResultsIn 199 total patients who underwent BCG for NMIBC, 23 had a prior history of prostate radiotherapy treatment, while 17 underwent prior radical prostatectomy. Overall, 41.2% of patients had recurrence at 1 year. There was no difference in the number of induction or maintenance BCG administrations received between the cohorts within the first year. There was no significant difference in recurrence at 1 year between the 3 cohorts (P = .56). There was also no difference in progression to MIBC or progression to metastatic disease with P = .50 and 0.89, respectively.ConclusionThe risk of recurrence after induction BCG treatment for high-grade NMIBC does not vary according to prior radiation treatment for prostate cancer.     

Association of Apatinib and Breast Cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundBreast cancer (BC) is a common malignant tumor. Apatinib in combination with other treatments has been used for BC; however, its safety and efficacy are not well-known. Therefore, this meta-analysis was performed to assess the efficacy and safety of apatinib in the treatment of BC.MethodsStudies comparing the effects of apatinib-based therapy versus control among BC patients were included. On January 21, 2022, a systematic search was performed in 9 databases. The risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to estimate efficacy and safety. The I square value (I²) was used to assess heterogeneity. A leave-one-out sensitivity analysis was also conducted. Publication bias was assessed by funnel plots and Egger's and Begg's tests.ResultsA total of 31 studies including 2,258 BC patients were included. The results showed that apatinib group had a significant improvement in disease control rate (DCR, RR = 1.43, 95% CI = 1.35–1.52, I² = 43.8%) and objective response rate (ORR, RR = 1.79, 95% CI = 1.51–2.13, I² = 61.8%) compared to the control group. Except for hemorrhage, hypertension, and hand-foot syndrome, the adverse events were similar between apatinib group and control group. Subgroup analyses found statistically significant differences in DCR in all subgroups except for apatinib combined with radiation therapy and with paclitaxel liposome plus S1. For ORR, there were statistically significant differences in all subgroups except for the radiation therapy, and apatinib monotherapy subgroups.ConclusionsOur study shown apatinib showed good efficacy and acceptable safety in the treatment of BC patients. More high-quality randomized controlled trials from different regions and countries are needed to confirm our findings.     

Prognostic Value of Body Mass Index in Stage II/III Colon Cancer: Posthoc Analysis From the TOSCA Trial

BackgroundHigh body mass index (BMI) plays a key role in the development of colon cancer (CC). Our post-hoc analysis from the TOSCA trial analyzed the association between BMI and survival outcomes in terms of relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in stage II/III CC patients.Patients and methodsPatients enrolled in the TOSCA trial between 2007-2013 with BMI data entered the study. The prognostic impact of BMI on survival outcomes was investigated through uni- and multivariable Cox regression analyses.ResultsOverall, 1455 patients with stage II/III CC patients were included. The median follow-up was of 61.5 months; 16.1% of patients relapsed, 11.2% died and 19.5% patients relapsed or died. No impact of BMI on RFS was detected at univariate or multivariable analyses. By univariate analysis for OS, a significantly impact of a BMI > 30 kg/m² was reported (HR [>30 vs <25] 1.57, 95% CI 1.00-2.47, p = 0.049; HR [>30 vs <30] 1.55, 95% CI 1.01-2.37, p = 0.045). Multivariable analyses did not confirm this data. In the subgroup of stage III patients, a negative survival impact of BMI was found in univariate and multivariable models both for RFS and for OS.ConclusionsIn our study, obesity with BMI > 30 kg/m² was an independent prognostic factor for RFS and OS in CC patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy, regardless of its duration (3 or 6 months). However, the prognostic impact of adiposity and body composition measurement should be considered to better classify patients with high visceral fat and refine their risk assessment.     

Clinical Updates for Colon Cancer Care in 2022

Colon cancer needs better screening and treatment options. Its incidence in the young population is rising. Recent changes in guidelines recommend beginning screening for colon cancer at the age of 45. Circulating tumor DNA presents an opportunity to select patients for administration of adjuvant chemotherapy. Immunotherapy is an option for patients with a deficiency in mismatch repair proteins. However, its efficacy outside of this group of patients remains a challenge. Targeted therapies such as BRAF inhibitors are an option for patients with poor prognosis, for whom cytotoxic chemotherapy is not as effective. This review presents the recently published evidence regarding screening and treating patients with colon cancer.     

Treatment of Patients with Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review of Economic Evaluations

The management of patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) has been significantly modified by the availability of innovative but expensive treatments, increasing the economic burden of prostate cancer. Here, we aimed to systematically identify and review published economic evaluations (EEs) related to the treatment of mHSPC and assess their quality. A systematic search was performed of the PubMed and Cochrane databases. Three reviewers independently selected EEs by defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. They extracted all data from each EE (general information, study population, data about the EE, interventions and comparators, and outcomes). They also assessed the quality of the selected EEs according to Drummond's checklist. Fourteen EEs published between 2016 and 2021 were eligible for the systematic review. The EEs found ADT + docetaxel to be the most cost-effective of all available treatments as a first-line strategy for mHSPC (abiraterone acetate plus prednisone, enzalutamide, and apalutamide). Five EEs showed that a simple price reduction of abiraterone acetate of 50% to 75% could change the results to render this treatment also cost-effective relative to that with docetaxel. Twelve EEs were of high quality, with a Drummond score ≥ 7. Analysis of the 14 EEs identified by our systematic review, amongst which 78.6% met high quality standards, showed that ADT + docetaxel tends to be the most cost-effective alternative for mHSPC. These results were assessed by sensitivity analysis. The data provided by this systematic review help to provide a better understanding of these treatments and the better use of healthcare resources.     

Combining CAPRA-S With Tumor IDC/C Features Improves the Prognostication of Biochemical Recurrence in Prostate Cancer Patients

Background: Intraductal carcinoma and cribriform (IDC/C) tumor features are well-established prognosticators of biochemical recurrence (BCR), metastasis, and prostate cancer (PCa)-specific mortality. However, approximately 70% of PCa patients undergoing a radical prostatectomy are IDC/C negative, yet up-to 20% of these patients progress and experience BCR. Thus, tumor histopathologic characteristics such as IDC/C alone are limited in their ability to predict disease progression. Conversely, several nomograms such as Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment-Surgery (CAPRA-S) have been developed to aid in the prognostication of BCR, but not yet widely applied in clinical settings. Materials and methods: In this study, we assessed the combined prognostic utility of IDC/C, and CAPRA-S for BCR in 3 PCa patient cohorts. Results: CAPRA-S+IDC/C improved the predictive accuracy of BCR in all 3 cohorts (P < .001). Specifically, among IDC/C negative cases, CAPRA-S improved the prognostication of BCR in low-risk (Cohort 1; P < .001, Cohort 2; P < .001, Cohort 3; P = .003), intermediate (Cohort 1; P < .001, Cohort 2; P = .006, Cohort 3; P = .03) and high-risk (Cohort 1-3; P < .001) patients. Conversely, IDC/C improved the prognostication of BCR among CAPRA-S low-risk (Cohorts 1; P < .001 and Cohort 3; P = .003) patients. Conclusion: Our results suggest the investigation of histopathological IDC/C features in CAPRA-S low-risk patients and conversely, nomogram CAPRA-S among IDC/C negative patients improves the identification of patients likely to experience BCR, which would otherwise be missed through current assessment regimens. These patients can be offered more intensive monitoring and adjuvant therapies upfront to circumvent the development of recurrent cancer or overtreatment at the time of surgery.     

Perioperative,short-, and long-term outcomes of gastric cancer surgery: Propensity score-matched analysis of patients with or without prior solid organ transplantation

BackgroundDetails of perioperative outcomes and survival after gastric cancer surgery in prior transplant recipients have received minimal research attention.MethodsWe performed an observational cohort study using the database of 20,147 gastric cancer patients who underwent gastrectomy at a single gastric cancer center in Korea. Forty-one solid organ recipients [kidney (n = 35), liver (n = 5), or heart (n = 1)] were matched with 205 controls using propensity score matching.ResultsOperation time, blood loss, and postoperative pain were similar between groups. Short-term complication rates were similar between transplantation and control groups (22.0% vs. 20.1%, P = 0.777). Transplantation group patients with stage 1 gastric cancer experienced no recurrence, while those with stage 2/3 cancer had significantly higher recurrence risk compared to the controls (P = 0.049). For patients with stage 1 cancer, the transplantation group had a significantly higher rate of non-gastric cancer-related deaths compared to the controls (19.2% vs. 1.4%, P = 0.001). For those with stage 2/3 cancer, significantly lower proportion of the transplantation group received adjuvant chemotherapy compared to the control group (26.7% vs. 80.3%, P < 0.001). The transplantation group had a higher (albeit not statistically significant) rate of gastric cancer-related deaths compared to the controls (40.0% vs. 18.0%, P = 0.087).ConclusionTransplant recipients and non-transplant recipients exhibited similar perioperative and short-term outcomes after gastric cancer surgery. From long-term outcome analyses, we suggest active surveillance for non-gastric cancer-related deaths in patients with early gastric cancer, as well as strict oncologic care in patients with advanced cancer, as effective strategies for transplant recipients.     

Breast reconstruction after therapeutic or prophylactic mastectomy for breast cancer: A comparison of guideline recommendations

BackgroundThe purpose of this article is to illuminate differences in published clinical practice guideline recommendations for breast reconstruction after prophylactic and therapeutic mastectomy.MethodsTen guidelines were identified through a systematic search of websites and databases of reputable oncology guideline developers, and key differences and gaps in recommendations were noted. Quality assessment of the guidelines was conducted by three reviewers using the AGREE II tool, focusing on breast reconstruction specific documents rather than the general breast cancer guidelines.ResultsThe most comprehensive guidelines were published by Alberta Health Services, Cancer Care Ontario, the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, and the Association of Breast Surgery/British Association of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. AGREE II scores in the domains of “Scope and Purpose” and “Clarity and Presentation” were ranked relatively high for all four guidelines while “Applicability” and “Editorial Independence” were ranked relatively low. The Alberta and Ontario guidelines were the overall highest ranked guidelines across all domains.ConclusionOverall, these guidelines provide consistent recommendations on who should receive breast reconstruction education, who is a candidate for postmastectomy breast reconstruction, and the appropriate timing of reconstruction and extent of mastectomy. Future updates from all should focus on expanding to include alloplastic and autologous forms of reconstruction and should include a broad scope of relevant questions.