Mediation of skin allograft rejection in scid mice by CD4+ and CD8+ T cells.

We analyzed the role of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in H-2-disparate skin allograft rejection in the mutant mouse strain C.B-17/Icr scid with severe combined immunodeficiency. On the day of skin allografting, scid mice were adoptively transferred with negatively selected CD4+ or CD8+ splenocytes from normal unsensitized C.B-17/Icr mice. These populations were obtained using a double-mAb--plus--complement elimination protocol using anti-CD4 or anti-CD8 mAb that resulted in no detectable CD4+ or CD8+ cells by FACS and negligible numbers of cytolytic T lymphocytes by limiting dilution analysis in anti-CD8 treated populations. Spleen cells were removed from grafted mice at the time of rejection and were tested in vitro for antidonor reactivity in several assays: mixed lymphocyte culture, cell-mediated lympholysis, and LDA for CTL and for IL-2-producing HTL. The presence of Thy 1.2+, CD4+, or CD8+ cells was determined by FACS. All control C.B-17 mice and scid mice adoptively transferred with nondepleted CD4+, and CD8+ cells rejected skin allografts with similar mean survival times (15.6 +/- 1.5, 18.8 +/- 3.4, 18.0 +/- 5.4, respectively), whereas control scid mice retain skin allografts indefinitely (all greater than 100 days). C.B-17 syngeneic grafts survived indefinitely in all groups. At the time of rejection, splenocytes from scid mice receiving CD4+ cells had negligible donor-specific cytotoxicity in CML and negligible numbers of CTL by LDA, but demonstrated a good proliferative response in MLC and IL-2-producing cells by LDA (frequency = 1/1764). There were no detectable CD8+ cells present by FACS analysis. Conversely, splenocytes from scid mice adoptively transferred with CD8+ cells had strong donor-specific cytotoxicity in CML (58.8% +/- 16.1%) and CTL by LDA (frequency = 1/3448), but no significant proliferation was detected in MLC. There were no detectable CD4+ cells by FACS, but there were small numbers of IL-2-producing cells by LDA (frequency = 1/10,204). These data demonstrate that CD4+ cells adoptively transferred into scid mice are capable of mediating skin allograft rejection in the absence of any detectable CD8+ cells or significant functional cytolytic activity. The adoptive transfer of CD8+ cells also results in skin allograft rejection in the absence of detectable CD4+ cells. The detection of small numbers of IL-2 secreting cells in these mice may indicate that CD(8+)-mediated allograft rejection in this model is dependent on IL-2-secreting CD8+ cells.     

CD25+CD4+ regulatory T cells develop in mice not only during spontaneous acceptance of liver allografts but also after acute allograft rejection

BACKGROUND: Liver grafts transplanted across a major histocompatibility barrier are accepted spontaneously and induce donor specific tolerance in some species. Here, we investigated whether liver allograft acceptance is characterized by, and depends upon, the presence of donor reactive CD25CD4 regulatory T cells. METHODS: CD25 and CD25CD4 T cells, isolated from CBA. Ca (H2) recipients of C57BL/10 (B10; H2) liver and heart allografts 10 days after transplantation, were transferred into CBA. Rag1 mice to investigate their influence on skin allograft rejection mediated by CD45RBCD4 effector T Cells. RESULTS: Fully allogeneic B10 liver allografts were spontaneously accepted by naive CBA.Ca recipient mice, whereas B10 cardiac allografts were acutely rejected (mean survival time=7 days). Strikingly, however, CD25CD4 T cells isolated from both liver and cardiac allograft recipients were able to prevent skin allograft rejection in this adoptive transfer model. Interestingly, CD25CD4 T cells isolated from liver graft recipients also showed suppressive potency upon adoptive transfer. Furthermore, depletion of CD25CD4 T cells in primary liver allograft recipients did not prevent the acceptance of a secondary donor-specific skin graft. CONCLUSIONS: Our data provide evidence that the presence of CD25CD4 regulatory T cells is not a unique feature of allograft acceptance and is more likely the result of sustained exposure to donor alloantigens in vivo.     

CD4+ T cells are sufficient to elicit allograft rejection and major histocompatibility complex class I molecule is required to induce recurrent autoimmune diabetes after pancreas transplantation in mice

BACKGROUND: We characterized the role of T cell subsets and major histocompatibility complex molecules in allograft rejection and recurrence of autoimmune diabetes. METHODS: Adoptive cell transfer and vascularized segmental pancreas transplantation were performed in mice. RESULTS: In an alloimmune response model, transfer of nondiabetic CD4, but not CD8 T cells, elicited pancreas allograft rejection in streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetic NOD/scid mice. Pancreas allografts were acutely rejected in STZ-induced diabetic NOD/beta2m mice (confirmed the absence of major histocompatibility complex [MHC] class I and CD8 T cells) and permanently accepted in NOD/CIIT mice (confirmed the absence of MHC class II and CD4 T cells). The results suggest that rejection of pancreas allograft is CD4-dependent and MHC class I-independent. In the autoimmune diabetes model, whole spleen cells obtained from diabetic NOD mice induced autoimmune diabetes in NOD/scid and NOD/CIIT mice, but the onset of diabetes was delayed in NOD/beta2m mice. However, the purified diabetic T cells failed to elicit autoimmune diabetes in NOD/beta2m mice. NOD/scid and NOD/CIIT pancreas grafts were acutely destroyed whereas four of six NOD/beta2m pancreas grafts were permanently accepted in autoimmune diabetic NOD mice. CONCLUSION: CD4 T cells are sufficient for the induction of allograft rejection, and MHC class I molecule is required to induce recurrent autoimmune diabetes after pancreas transplantation in mice.     

Allograft rejection in CD4+ T cell-reconstituted athymic nude rats--the nonessential role of host-derived CD8+ cells.

PVG-rnu/rnu nude rats reject fully allogenic renal (DA) and skin (BN, AO) allografts after the adoptive transfer of naive CD4+ T cells alone, but rejection is accompanied by the accumulation of many nude-derived CD8+ leukocytes within the graft. In addition, mononuclear cells infiltrating the rejecting renal grafts in these animals display cytotoxic activity in vitro against specific and third-party alloantigens. In this investigation we have treated CD4+ T cell-restored nude rats bearing renal or skin allografts with the mAb MRC OX8 to deplete the host of CD8+ cells. In vivo treatment with OX8 completely eliminated CD8+ cells from rejecting grafts of both kidney and skin, but it did not prevent graft rejection, nor did OX8 treatment abolish the cytotoxic effector cells found in nude rat spleen or in graft-infiltrating cells (GIC) of rejecting renal allografts. The nature of the cytotoxic activity was examined with anti-CD3 mAb 1F4, which was shown to block conventional CD8+ Tc killing in vitro but did not inhibit allogeneic target cell lysis by spleen cells from nude rats. The cytotoxic activity found in GIC of rejecting allografts was not inhibited by anti-CD3 mAb, suggesting that these cytotoxic effector cells were CD3-CD8- and were of extrathymic origin. We conclude that non-thymus-derived CD8+ GIC are not essential for allograft rejection in CD4+ T cell-restored nude rats.     

Role of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in murine skin and heart allograft rejection across different antigenic desparities

The factors that influence the relative contribution of the T cell subsets to allograft rejection remain unclear. We compared skin and heart rejection in CD4 Knockout (KO), and CD8 KO mice across full-, minor-, and class II histocompatibility antigen (HA) mismatches. Skin allografts were rejected by either CD4+ or CD8+ T cells alone at any degree of antigenic mismatch. However, either the absence of CD4+ cells or a lesser degree of HA mismatch resulted in prolongation of graft survival. In contrast, fully allogeneic heart grafts were accepted in CD4 KO recipients, and minor HA mismatched heart grafts were accepted by both CD4 KO and CD8 KO mice. Thus, the T cell subsets required for allograft rejection are determined by the immunogenicity of the tissue transplanted. In the absence of CD8+ T cells, perforin and Fas ligand (FasL) but not granzyme B mRNA were detected in rejecting grafts. Thus, granzyme B is a CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL)-specific effector molecule.     

A major role for host MHC class I antigen presentation for promoting islet allograft survival

The purpose of this study was to determine the role for CD8 T cells versus generalized MHC class I-restricted antigen presentation in islet allograft rejection and tolerance. Diabetic C57BI/6 (B6, H-2(b)) controls, C57BI/6 CD8-deficient (CD8 KO), or MHC class I-deficient C57BI/6 (beta 2m KO) recipients were grafted with allogeneic BALB/c (H-2(d)) islets. Islet allografts were acutely rejected in untreated B6, CD8 KO, and in beta 2m KO mice, indicating that neither CD8 T cells nor host MHC class I is required for allograft rejection. We then determined the efficacy of costimulation blockade in these same strains. Costimulation blockade with anti-CD154 therapy facilitated long-term islet allograft survival in both B6 and in CD8 KO recipients. However, anti-CD154 treated beta 2m KO recipients were completely refractory to anti-CD154 therapy; all treated animals acutely rejected islet allografts with or without therapy. Also, anti-NK1.1 treatment of wild-type B6 mice abrogated graft prolongation following anti-CD154 therapy. Taken together, results show a dramatic distinction between two forms of MHC class I-restricted pathways in allograft prolongation. Although anti-CD154-induced allograft survival was CD8 T-cell independent, an intact host MHC class I-restricted (beta 2m-dependent) pathway is nevertheless necessary for allograft survival. This pathway required NK1.1+ cells, implicating NK and/or NKT cells in promoting allograft prolongation in vivo.     

CD4+ T cells responsive through the indirect pathway can mediate skin graft rejection in the absence of interferon-gamma

BACKGROUND: T cells responding through the indirect pathway can induce allograft rejection, but mechanisms of rejection are not known. Interferon-y (IFN-gamma) may be an important mediator of rejection under these circumstances. METHODS: We transferred CD4+ T cells from IFN-gamma-deficient (IFN-gamma-/-) mice into SCID recipients of MHC II-deficient (MHC II-/-) skin grafts. Under these conditions, rejection can only occur via the indirect pathway and cannot be mediated by T-cell production of IFN-gamma. RESULTS: IFN-gamma-/- CD4+ T cells rejected MHC II -/- skin grafts. Flow cytometry revealed only CD4+ T cells in the recipients. Cytokine enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot assays confirmed only indirect recognition with an associated expansion of an alloreactive population of IL-2-, IL-4-, and IL-5-secreting T cells. CONCLUSION: CD4+ T cells recognizing alloantigens via the indirect pathway can mediate skin graft rejection in the absence of IFN-gamma.     

Spontaneous allograft tolerance in B7-deficient mice independent of preexisting endogenous CD4+CD25+ regulatory T-cells

BACKGROUND: Acute cardiac allograft rejection requires host, but not donor, expression of B7-1/B7-2 costimulatory molecules. However, acute cardiac rejection requires direct antigen presentation by donor-derived antigen presenting cells to CD4 T-cells and does not require indirect antigen presentation to CD4 T-cells. Given this discrepancy in the literature and that the consequence of allograft exposure in B7-deficient mice is unknown; the goal of the study was to examine the antidonor status of allografted B7-1/B7-2-deficient hosts. METHODS: C57Bl/6 B7-1/B7-2-/- mice were grafted with heterotopic BALB/c hearts. Recipients bearing long-term surviving allografts were used to examine the status of antidonor reactivity in vitro and in vivo. Tolerance was examined in vivo through adoptive transfer of splenocytes from graft-bearing animals to secondary immune-deficient Rag-1-/- hosts bearing donor-type or third-party cardiac allografts and by regulatory T-cell depletion with anti-CD25 antibody. RESULTS: When transferred to B7-replete Rag-1-/- recipients, cells from na?ve B7-1/B7-2-/- mice readily initiated cardiac allograft rejection. However, splenocytes transferred from long-term allograft acceptor B7-1/B7-2-/- hosts failed to reject donor-type hearts but acutely rejected third-party allografts. In addition, such cells did not reject (donorxthird-party) F1 allografts. Finally, in vivo depletion of regulatory T-cells did not prevent long-term acceptance. CONCLUSIONS: Results demonstrate that B7-deficient T-cells are capable of acute cardiac allograft rejection in a B7-replete environment. Importantly, results also show that B7-deficient hosts do not simply ignore cardiac allografts, but rather spontaneously develop transferable, donor-specific tolerance and linked suppression in vivo. Interestingly, this tolerant state does not require endogenous CD4+CD25+ regulatory T-cells.     

Allograft rejection in athymic nude rats by transferred T cell subsets. II. The response of naive CD4+ and CD8+ thoracic duct lymphocytes to an isolated MHC class I disparity

Athymic PVG-rnu/rnu (RT1c) rats were grafted with skin bearing isolated MHC disparities 7-14 days in advance of cell transfer. The ability of naive CD4+ or CD8+ thoracic duct lymphocytes to induce rejection was assessed by adoptive transfer of one or both T cell subsets into nude recipients bearing congenic PVG.r1 (MHC class I-only disparity, Aa) or PVG.r19 (class I and II-only disparity, Aa B/Da) skin grafts. Recipients of purified CD4+ TDL always rejected r19 allografts, whereas CD8+ TDL were ineffective against this class I + II difference. Neither the injection of CD4+ TDL nor CD8+ TDL alone resulted in destruction of r1 skin grafts. However, rejection of r1 tissue was observed in 63% of cases (19/30) when both CD4+ and CD8+ TDL were present in the nude recipients. Rejection of r1 skin was also induced in some recipients when CD8+ TDL were transferred 8 weeks in advance of CD4+ TDL. In contrast, sequential transfer in the reverse order apparently induced tolerance in the CD4+ population--i.e., surviving r1 skin grafts on 8 week CD4+ T cell-reconstituted nude recipients were not rejected following the subsequent transfer of CD8+ TDL. We conclude that CD4+ T cells were required for rejection of both class I and class II differences. In the presence of a class II difference, CD4+ T cells function autonomously to initiate both the inducer and effector stages of rejection. When the disparity is confined to class I, CD8+ T cells are required (probably at the effector stage) but are dependent on CD4+ T cells for help. There was no evidence of CD4+ effector T cells that could recognize class I directly within the graft.     

The Classical Complement Pathway in Transplantation: Unanticipated Protective Effects of C1q and Role in Inductive Antibody Therapy

Though complement (C) deposition within the transplant is associated with allograft rejection, the pathways employed have not been established. In addition, evidence suggests that C-mediated cytolysis may be necessary for the tolerance-inducing activities of mAb therapies. Hence, we assessed the role of the classical C pathway in acute allograft rejection and its requirement for experimental mAb therapies. C1q-deficient (C1q-/-) recipients rejected allografts at a faster rate than wild-type (WT) recipients. This rejection was associated with exacerbated graft pathology but not with enhanced T-cell responses in C1q-/- recipients. However, the humoral response to donor alloantigens was accelerated in C1q-/- mice, as an early IgG response and IgG deposition within the graft were observed. Furthermore, deposition of C3d, but not C4d was observed in grafts isolated from C1q-/- recipients. To assess the role of the classical C pathway in inductive mAb therapies, C1q-/- recipients were treated with anti-CD4 or anti-CD40L mAb. The protective effects of anti-CD4 mAb were reduced in C1q-/- recipients, however, this effect did not correlate with ineffective depletion of CD4+ cells. In contrast, the protective effects of anti-CD40L mAb were less compromised in C1q-/- recipients. Hence, this study reveals unanticipated roles for C1q in the rejection process.     

Transgenic anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody secretion by mouse segmental pancreas allografts promotes long term survival

To compare the effectiveness of transgenic and systemic monoclonal antibody therapy for pancreas transplantation, vascularised segmental pancreas allografts from wild-type or transgenic pancreatic tissue that secreted monoclonal anti-CD4 were placed in CBA recipients in which diabetes had been induced chemically by streptozotocin (STZ, non-autoimmune diabetes). In untreated CBA recipients, wild-type BALB/c or C57BL/6 bml pancreas transplants were rejected in a mean survival time (MST) of 27 and 30 days, respectively. BALB/c and C57BL/6 graft survival improved when recipients were given a short course of T cell depleting monoclonal anti-CD4 antibody, (GK 1.5, 2 mg total on days -1, 0, 1, 2 with grafting on day 0) with MST +/- S.D. of 71 +/- 29 and 44 +/- 36 days, respectively. Thus, transient depletion of CD4 was effective in delaying pancreas allograft rejection in these strain combinations. The use of C57BL/6 bml mice transgenic for a rat anti-CD4 antibody (GK5 mice) as pancreas donors provided allografts that secreted sufficient anti-CD4 antibody to cause CD4 T cell depletion in the recipients (CD4 cells decreased from 30 to < 5% of small lymphocytes). This degree of depletion was not sustained and the CD4 recovery inversely correlated with graft survival. Mice with > 20% CD4 cells in the splenic lymphocyte population 4 weeks post-transplant rejected their grafts (3 of 10 mice). However, in 7 of 10 mice CD4 cells remained low (< 15%) and allografts survived for > 80 days. The GK5 allografts survived significantly longer than those from non-transgenic bml controls (MST 83 +/- 32 days, compared with 30 days, P < 0.0005). This survival time was similar to that of BALB/c allografts in CBA recipients treated with a high dose of anti-CD4 antibody. Thus, transgenic secretion of anti-CD4 antibody by the pancreas allograft was very effective in prolonging its survival.     

Aggressive skin allograft rejection in CD28-/- mice independent of the CD40/CD40L costimulatory pathway.

CD28-/- mice have been utilized to study the role of B7/CD28 and B7-CTLA4 interactions. There is evidence that CTLA4 ligation may be critical for tolerance induction. The aim of the current study is to further investigate rejection responses of CD28-/- mice and to define the role of B7-CTLA4 interactions in the absence of the CD40 and CD28 pathways. Balb/c skin allografts were transplanted onto C57BL/6 (B6) wild type or CD28-/- mice treated with anti-CD40L, CTLA4-Ig, or combination blockade. To investigate the cellular mechanism of rejection in CD28-/- recipients, mice were treated with anti-CD4 or anti-CD8 antibodies prior to treatment with costimulation blockade. The fluoroscein dye CFSE was utilized to study T cell expansion in vivo. Surprisingly, treatment of B6 CD28-/- mice with CTLA4-Ig alone (MST 12d), anti-CD40L alone (MST 13d), or combined blockade (MST 13d) had no effect on allograft survival compared to untreated B6 CD28 mice (MST 11d). CD28-/- recipients depleted of CD4+ cells and treated with CTLA4-Ig, anti-CD40L, or combination blockade also did not have prolonged survival compared with untreated mice (MST 10d). In contrast, CD28-/- recipients depleted of CD8+ cells had markedly prolonged allograft survival when treated with either anti-CD40L alone (MST 49d) or with combination blockade (MST 57d). Studies utilizing CFSE demonstrated that CD28-/- CD8+ T cells are not defective in in vivo proliferation responses compared with wild type CD8 cells. Thus, CD28-/- CD8+ T cells are responsible for aggressive rejection responses of CD28-/- mice independent of the CD40 pathway. In addition, CD40L blockade does not result in CD4+ T cell tolerance in CD28 recipients, despite an intact B7-CTLA4 pathway.     

CD8 T cell-mediated rejection of intestinal allografts is resistant to inhibition of the CD40/CD154 costimulatory pathway

BACKGROUND: Disruption of the CD40/CD154 pathway inhibits rejection in numerous models. The importance of this pathway on intestinal allograft rejection was examined in this study. METHODS: Intestinal grafts from B6C3F1 mice transplanted into C57BL/6 recipients were assessed histologically for rejection. RESULTS: The monoclonal antibody to CD154, MR1, failed to inhibit rejection in wild-type mice. Similarly, CD154-/- recipient mice rejected intestinal allografts. MR1 did inhibit early rejection in CD8-/- mice, but had no effect in CD4-/- recipients. All MR1-treated CD8-/- recipients eventually developed rejection. No benefit was observed when blockade of the CD40/CD154 pathway by MR1 was combined with blockade of the CD28/B7 pathway by mCTLA4Ig. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that CD4+ T cells mediating intestinal allograft rejection may be more dependent upon the CD40/CD154 pathway than CD8+ T cells. This finding highlights the importance of identifying agents that suppress CD8+ T cell-mediated rejection.     

Spleen plays an important role in maintaining tolerance after removal of the vascularized heart graft

BACKGROUND: This study addresses the question of the mechanism for maintaining tolerance to donor alloantigen in the absence of antigen and the role of secondary lymphoid tissues. METHODS: Depleting anti-CD4 antibody administration in conjunction with allogeneic heart transplantation generates donor-specific operational tolerance. Primary C57BL/6 heart grafts were transplanted into the neck cavity of the anti-CD4 antibody pretreated C3H/He mice. At day 50, functioning heart grafts were removed from tolerant mice. At day 100, a secondary C57BL/6 or a third-party heart was transplanted into the abdomen. RESULTS: Anti-CD4 antibody therapy induced CD4CD25 regulatory T cells by 50 days after transplantation, as depleting anti-CD25 treatment in tolerant mice abrogated graft prolongation when spleen leukocytes were adoptively transferred to syngeneic mice. Tolerance was maintained by CD4CD25 regulatory T cells via a CTLA-4 signal at 100 days, even after removal of the primary graft at day 50. Administration of anti-CD25 antibody immediately after removal of the primary graft did not break tolerance, as five out of six second allografts transplanted at day 100 were accepted. Anti-CD25 antibody therapy in conjunction with splenectomy, but not thymectomy, immediately after removal of primary heart grafts at day 50 broke tolerance at day 100; all allografts were rejected. CONCLUSION: The spleen is important in maintaining CD4CD25 regulatory T cells after primary allograft removal.     

CD4+ T cell recognition of a single discordant HLA-A2-transgenic molecule through the indirect antigen presentation pathway induces acute rejection of murine cardiac allografts.

To further define the role of indirect allorecognition, cardiac allografts from HLA-A2-transgenic (HLA-A2+) C57BL/6 mice were heterotopically transplanted into normal C57BL/6, CD4 T cell-knockout (KO) C57BL/6 mice, CD8 T cell-KO C57BL/6 mice, fully MHC-discordant BALB/c mice (allogeneic control), and HLA-A2+ C57BL/6 mice (syngeneic control). HLA-A2+ grafts were acutely rejected when transplanted into BALB/c mice (mean survival time: 10+/-0.8 days), normal C57BL/6 mice (mean survival time: 16.5+/-2.1 days) as well as CD8-KO mice (mean survival time: 12.8+/-1.3 days). Histopathological analysis revealed classical acute cellular rejection with moderate to severe diffuse interstitial CD4+ and CD8+ cellular infiltrates and significant intra-graft deposition of IgG and complement. In contrast, HLA-A2+ grafts were not rejected when transplanted into CD4-KO mice or HLA-A2+ mice. CD8-KO recipients treated with an anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody, but not with an anti-NK monoclonal antibody, failed to reject their allografts with prolonged administration of antibody (30 days). Spleen cells from mice rejecting HLA-A2+ allografts failed to lyse HLA-A2+ target cells indicating a lack of involvement of CD8+ T cells in the rejection process. In contrast, spleen cells from rejecting animals proliferated significantly to both HLA-A2+ cells and to a peptide derived from the HLA-A2 molecule. Development of anti-HLA-A2 antibodies was observed in all animals rejecting HLA-A2+ allografts. These results suggest that indirect allorecognition of donor MHC class I molecules leads to rejection of cardiac allografts and development of alloantibodies in this unique transplant model in which there is a single MHC discordance between donor and recipient.     

Primed allospecific T cells prevent the effects of costimulatory blockade on prolonged cardiac allograft survival in mice.

Costimulatory blockade can induce long‐term allograft survival in naïve animals, but may not be as effective in animals with previously primed immune repertoires. We attempted to induce long‐term graft survival in B10.D2 recipients of B10.A cardiac allografts using donor‐specific transfusion (DST) plus anti‐CD40 ligand antibody (αCD40L). Recipients were either naïve mice, or mice previously primed to B10.A or third party alloantigens through engraftment and rejection of skin transplants. Untreated naïve mice rejected cardiac transplants by day 15 and contained a high frequency of primed, donor‐reactive T cells. Donor‐specific transfusion/αCD40L treatment of naïve animals induced long‐term graft survival associated with low frequencies of donor‐reactive T cells. Previous priming of donor‐specific T cells through rejection of B10.A, but not third party, skin grafts prevented the effects of DST/αCD40L on prolonging survival of B10.A hearts. Moreover, adoptive transfer of CD3+, CD4+ or CD8+ T cells from B10.A skin‐graft‐primed animals prevented the effects of DST/αCD40L. The data demonstrate that animals with immune repertoires containing previously primed, donor‐reactive T cells are resistant to the effects of costimulatory blockade. The findings have important implications for ongoing, costimulatory blockade‐based trials in humans, whose T‐cell repertoires are known to contain memory alloreactive T cells.     

An increase in the survival of murine H-2-mismatched cultured fetal pancreas allografts using depleting or nondepleting anti-CD4 monoclonal antibodies, and a further increase with the addition of cyclosporine

Depletion of CD4+ T lymphocytes with monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) has been shown to prolong allograft survival in mice. In this study, two rat anti-CD4 mAbs, H129.19 and GK1.5, were administered either alone or in combination with cyclosporine (CsA) to recipients of MHC-mismatched (H-2k to H-2d) cultured fetal pancreas allografts to determine their effect on graft survival. When compared with control mice, splenic CD4+ cells of GK1.5-treated mice were depleted by greater than 95%, but in H129.19-treated mice no depletion of CD4+ cells occurred. Instead, rat Ig was present on the surface of CD4+ cells in H129.19-treated mice. Anti-CD4 therapy with either H129.19 or GK1.5 prolonged fetal pancreas allograft survival to a similar extent, but did not lead to indefinite survival. Blockade of the CD4 antigen by the mAb H129.19 was as effective as the depletion of CD4+ cells by GK1.5 in prolonging allograft survival. Rejection of grafts by day 28 posttransplantation occurred in the absence of CD4+ cells, as determined by both flow cytometric examination of spleen cells and immunoperoxidase staining of the graft site. CsA alone did not prolong graft survival, but its addition to either H129.19 or GK1.5 mAb treatment significantly increased the survival rate of grafts at 28 days compared with mAb treatment alone. These results suggest that CD4+ cell depletion is not essential for effective anti-CD4 mAb therapy--and, further, that CsA may have a direct inhibitory effect on CD8+ cells during allograft rejection.     

Differential Roles of CD8+ and CD8− T Lymphocytes in Corneal Allograft Rejection in ''High-Risk'' Hosts

We examined the role of perforin and FasL in corneal allograft rejection mediated by CD8+ and CD8 T cells. BALB/c corneas were transplanted orthotopically into vascularized, 'high-risk' graft beds in C57BL/6 mice, perforin knockout mice and FasL-defective gld/gld mice. CD8+ and CD8 T cells were collected following graft rejection and adoptively transferred to SCID mice, which were then challenged with BALB/c corneal allografts. In every case, CD8 T cells could mediate graft rejection when adoptively transferred to SCID mice that received BALB/c corneal allografts. Although CD8+ T cells also mediated graft rejection, the tempo was slower. Moreover, CD8+ T cells collected FasL-defective donors that had rejected corneal allografts, mediated corneal allograft rejection in only 50% of the SCID mice that received the adoptively transferred cells. In some cases, CD8+ T-cell-mediated rejection occurred in the absence of delayed-type hypersensitivity and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte activity, but was associated with CD8+ T-cell-mediated apoptosis of BALB/c corneal cells in vitro. The results demonstrate the redundancy in immune mechanisms of corneal allograft rejection. Either CD8+ or CD8 T cells can produce corneal allograft rejection, however functional FasL is necessary for optimal rejection, even in a high-risk setting.     

Simultaneous blockade of co-stimulatory signals, CD28 and ICOS, induced a stable tolerance in rat heart transplantation

An inducible co-stimulator (ICOS), a recently identified co-stimulatory receptor with a close structural homology of CD28 and CTLA4, is expressed on activated T cells. Anti-ICOS antibody was demonstrated to be effective on prolongation of graft survival after liver transplantation in rats. In this study, we investigated the potency of tolerance induction using the antibody combined with a recombinant adenovirus vector containing CTLA-4Ig cDNA (AdCTLA-4Ig) in rat heart transplantation model. Using a DA-to-Lewis rat heart transplantation model, an anti-rat ICOS antibody and AdCTLA-4Ig were simultaneously administered i.v. into recipients. The tissue specimens from the grafts were removed on various days after transplantation for histological evaluation. Donor-strain skin and heart grafts, and third-party heart allografts were challenged in the recipients with a long-term surviving graft. Splenocytes from the tolerance-induced recipients were used for adoptive transfer study. Anti-ICOS antibody alone did not prolong the survival of heart allograft. AdCTLA-4Ig monotherapy significantly prolonged the survival of heart allograft (Group 4). With a combination of Anti-ICOS antibody and AdCTLA-4Ig, all recipients were resulted in a long-term allograft acceptance for more than 200 days (Group 8). When challenged donor-strain skin grafts in the tolerant rats of Group 4, the skin was rejected, which also lead to a rejection of primary heart allografts. The recipients in Group 8 also rejected donor-strain skin grafts with no rejection of the primary heart grafts. These recipients accepted secondary heart grafts from donor-strain but not third-party. In Group 8 long-term survival recipients showed a high population of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cell in peripheral blood, and in adoptive transfer study subtraction of these CD4+CD25+ T cells accelerate the rejection of heart graft in secondary irradiated recipients. The present results demonstrated that anti-ICOS antibody combined with AdCTLA-4Ig potently induces a stable immune tolerance after heart allografting in rat, which is mediated by the induction of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells. This strategy may be attractive for clinical employment to induce transplantation tolerance.     

Patterns of immune responses evoked by allogeneic hepatocytes: evidence for independent co-dominant roles for CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell responses in acute rejection.

INTRODUCTION: This is the first in a series of reports that characterizes immune responses evoked by allogeneic hepatocytes using a functional model of hepatocyte transplantation in mice. METHODS: "Donor" hepatocytes expressing the transgene human alpha-1-antitrypsin (hA1AT-FVB/N, H2q) were transplanted into C57BL/6 (H2b) or MHC II knockout (H2b) hosts treated with anti-CD4, anti-CD8, or a combination of anti-CD4 and anti-CD8 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). Hepatocyte rejection was determined as a loss of circulating ELISA-detectable transgene product (hA1AT). In addition, some C57BL/6 mice underwent transplantation with FVB/N heterotopic cardiac allografts and were treated with anti-CD4 mAb. Cardiac allograft rejection was determined by palpation. Graft recipients were tested for donor-reactive alloantibodies and donor-reactive delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) responses. RESULTS: The median survival time (MST) of allogeneic hepatocytes in normal C57BL/6 mice was 10 days (no treatment), 10 days (anti-CD4 mAb), 14 days (anti-CD8 mAb), and 35 days (anti-CD4 and anti-CD8 mAbs). The MST of hepatocytes in B6 MHC class II knockout mice was 10 days (no treatment) and 21 days (anti-CD8 mAb). The MST of cardiac allografts was 11 days (no treatment) and >100 days (anti-CD4 mAb). Donor-reactive DTH responses were readily detected in both untreated and mAb-treated recipients. Donor-reactive alloantibody was barely detectable in untreated hosts. CONCLUSIONS: These studies demonstrate that allogeneic hepatocytes are highly immunogenic and stimulate strong cell-mediated immune responses by both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, even when treated with agents that can cause acceptance of cardiac allografts. Indeed, CD4+ or CD8+ T cells seem to independently cause hepatocellular allograft rejection. Allogeneic hepatocytes evoked strong donor-reactive DTH responses but were poor stimuli for donor-reactive antibody production. This is an unusual pattern of immune reactivity in allograft recipients.