Hepatitis G virus infection in hemodialysis patients and its relationship with hepatitis C virus infection

Our aim was to study the characteristics of hepatitis G virus (HGV) infection in hemodialysis (HD) patients. We evaluated 108 patients from two different units (A: 67 patients; B: 41 patients). HGV RNA and HCV RNA were detected by PCR. Nineteen patients (17.6%) were HGV RNA positive (20.9% in unit A and 12.2% in unit B (NS)). HCV RNA was positive in 19 patients (17.6%) (28.4% in unit A and 0 in unit B (p < 0.01)). Eight patients were HGV RNA and HCV RNA positive (group I), 11 HGV RNA positive (group II), 11 HCV RNA positive (group III), and 78 negative for both viruses (group IV). Time on HD was 51.3 +/- 37.0 months for group I, 36.0 +/- 27.9 months for group II, 63.5 +/- 40.2 months for group III, and 26.4 +/- 27.1 months for group IV (p < 0.01 for I and III). Seven patients (87.5%) from group I, 9 (81.8%) from group II, 10 (90.9%) from group III, and 44 (56.4%) from group IV had a history of transfusion (p < 0.03 for I, II and III). Two patients (25%) from group I, none from group II, 5 (45.4%) from group III, and 6 (7.7%) from group IV had chronic ALAT elevation (p < 0.01 for I and III). We conclude that HGV infection was frequent in our HD patients, related to transfusions and independent of HCV prevalence, and that HGV infection itself was not a cause of ALAT elevation suggesting chronic hepatitis.     

Hepatitis B virus infection in hemodialysis patients

Patients with chronic renal failure on hemodialysis suffer from impaired immune defense mechanisms. A defect in costimulatory signalling from antigen-presenting cells (APCs) for the antigen-specific activation of T cells leads to immune incompetence, particularly toward viral infections. The epidemiologic situation of dialysis patients who are treated in centers together with other immunocompromised patients and who need blood access 3 times weekly places them at a high risk for viral hepatitis B. Clinically, the infection shows a mild and subclinical, often anicteric, course, leading to chronic infection in the majority of cases. Typical consequences such as cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma may occur, however, seem to be less frequent than in hepatitis B-infected persons with normal renal function. Protection by vaccination is also hampered by the immune defect. Nevertheless, a high percentage of vaccinated patients is still desirable for infection control. Treatment of hepatitis B in dialysis patients is difficult because interferon-alfa is less effective and frequently leads to side effects. Lamivudine may become a future alternative, however, current experience is limited.     

Hepatitis C virus infection among kidney transplant recipients.

The extent of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection among kidney recipients was investigated in 67 patients by testing for anti-HCV paired serum samples, collected at time of transplantation and during follow-up (average 32 +/- 20 months). Prevalence of anti-HCV at transplant time was 48%, and was related to the time on dialysis and to the amount of blood transfusions. Following transplantation, nine (28%) seropositive patients lost anti-HCV and five (14%), previously seronegative, seroconverted. Anti-HCV was found to be positive in 92% of the patients with chronic liver disease who were on hemodialysis, but in 56% in kidney recipients with chronic hepatitis. Anti-HCV was positive in 50% of patients with resolving hepatitis before transplantation, but only in 21% of those with acute hepatitis following transplantation. This study confirms the high risk of HCV infection among hemodialysis and kidney recipient populations, and also that HCV is closely related with the length of time the patient is on hemodialysis as well as the number of blood units transfused. HCV is the main cause of acute and chronic liver disease in hemodialysis patients and of chronic liver disease in kidney recipients, but does not clearly influence the survival of the allograft nor that of patients.     

Treatment of hepatitis C virus with interferon in hemodialysis patients awaiting kidney transplant

INTRODUCTION: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is associated with worsening disease progression after renal transplant, and to date there is no available treatment for use at this stage. It has therefore been recommended to treat HCV infection with interferon (IFN) during the dialysis period while the patient is on the waiting list for transplantation. METHODS: We analyzed data from 27 patients on hemodialysis awaiting transplant, who were under IFN treatment for chronic HCV infection (dominant genotype, 1b). The starting regime was IFN alpha-2b, 3 MU x 3/week (n = 20) or pegylated IFN alpha-2a, 135 mg/week (n = 7). If there was clearance of HCV RNA in the first 3 to 6 months, we attempted to prolong IFN treatment for 1 year, although in many patients the dose had to be reduced. A sustained response was defined as viral clearance for at least 12 months after the end of treatment. RESULTS: Viremia was negative in 13 patients (48.1%) at the end of treatment, but two of these patients relapsed, to give an overall long-term response rate of 11 patients (40.7%) and incomplete follow-up in three patients. Viral clearance was not achieved in 11 patients. In three patients (12%), IFN had to be suspended before finishing the third month of therapy due to side effects (mainly pancytopenia and intolerance of a previous kidney graft). Seven patients showing a sustained response underwent transplant, maintaining a negative viremia result. CONCLUSIONS: IFN treatment was effective in a high proportion of dialysis patients with HCV infection, with response rates possibly even higher than for the general population. However, its use is restricted by a high incidence of side effects.     

维持性血液透析患者感染乙型和丙型肝炎的分析

目的为了评价血液透析（血透）患者乙型和丙型肝炎（HBV、HCV）感染状态及对临床情况和肝功能的影响。方法对62例血透患者应用ELISA法和RT-PCR法检测抗-HCV和HCVRNA，采用斑点杂交法和固相放免法检测HBV标志，并检测肝功能和血浆蛋白电泳。结果62例患者中，抗-HCVIgM阳性27例（43．6％），抗-HCVIgG阳性29例（46．8％），HCVRNA阳性34例（54．8％），三项任一项阳性37例（59．7％），5例（8．1％）HBsAg阳性，其中HBeAg和HBVDNA阳性3例。结论向透患者中HCV感染严重，临床情况及预后差，检测血浆蛋白和电泳较肝功能酶学能更好地作为肝炎诊断和反映病情的指标。     

Occult hepatitis C virus infection among hemodialysis patients

Occult hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection (i.e., detectable HCV-RNA in the liver or peripheral blood mononuclear cells) in the absence of both serum HCV-RNA and anti-HCV antibodies has not been investigated in hemodialysis patients. In this study, real-time PCR and in situ hybridization was used to test for the presence of genomic and antigenomic HCV-RNA in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of 109 hemodialysis patients with abnormal levels of liver enzymes. Occult HCV infection, determined by the presence of genomic HCV-RNA, was found in 45% of the patients; 53% of these patients had ongoing HCV replication, indicated by the presence of antigenomic HCV-RNA. Patients with occult HCV infection had spent a significantly longer time on hemodialysis and had significantly higher mean alanine aminotransferase levels during the 6 mo before study entry. Logistic regression analysis revealed that mortality was associated with age >60 yr (odds ratio 3.30; 95% confidence interval 1.05 to 10.33) and the presence of occult HCV infection (odds ratio 3.84; 95% confidence interval 1.29 to 11.43). In conclusion, the prevalence of occult HCV infection is high among hemodialysis patients with persistently abnormal values of liver enzymes of unknown cause. The clinical significance of occult HCV infection in these patients requires further study.     

Absence of hepatitis delta virus infection in chronic hemodialysis and kidney transplant patients in france.

Hemodialyzed patients and kidney recipients are frequently multiply-transfused and infected by hepatitis B virus (HBV). Hepatitis delta virus (HDV) has a symbiotic association with HBV. The prevalence of HDV infection has, surprisingly, not been assessed in patients in hemodialysis or renal transplantation setting. We retrospectively studied the prevalence of serum delta antigen and antidelta antibodies by a microenzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in 77 of the 80 HBsAg-positive patients who underwent a kidney transplantation over a 10-year period. Of these patients, 73% had active HBV replication as assessed by the presence of serum HBV DNA and 65% had a biopsy-proved chronic active hepatitis, including cirrhosis. None of our patients had any marker of HDV infection at the end of the hemodialysis period or at the end of follow-up in transplantation. These results establish that HDV superinfection has indeed been extremely rare during end-stage renal failure and kidney transplantation in France, in contrast to HBV reactivation or hepatitis C virus infection.     

维持性血液透析患者丙型肝炎病毒感染情况的调查与护理预防

目的 调查本透析中心6年间维持性血液透析患者丙型肝炎病毒的感染率变化情况,分析丙型肝炎病毒感染的易感因素,探讨预防丙型肝炎病毒传播的措施.方法 检测所有长期维持性血液透析患者丙型肝炎抗体,丙型肝炎RNA,并收集相关临床资料.结果 2004年155例透析患者中丙型肝炎感染率为10.3%.2009年228例患者中丙型肝炎抗体阳性率为8.8%.2010年300例丙型肝炎的感染率为7.3%.其中111例患者在我中心透析6年以上,累计透析85100余次,没有新发丙型肝炎感染.显示输血次数和肾移植病史是并发丙型肝炎的危险因素.结论 近6年来我中心的血液透析患者丙型肝炎感染率呈下降趋势.通过减少输血,严格执行血液透析时防止血源性传播疾病操作规程,能够减少丙型肝炎在透析患者之间的传播.

Abstract：

Objective To investigate the hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in patients with maintained hemodialysis for 6 years in the hemodialysis center of Beijing Friendship Hospital, and to analyse the risk factor of HCV infection. Methods HCV RNA , the serum virus antibody were detected in hemodialysis patients . The relationship between the infection of hepatitis virus and the dialysis time, blood infusion and hepatic function was analysed. Results The percentage of HCV infection patients was 10.3% ,8.8%, and 7.3% in 2004,2009,2010 respectively. 111 patients were treated in our center for more than 6 years. There was no new HCV infection in these group patients during 6 years. Blood infusion and the history of kidney implantation were the risk factors. Conclusion The percentage of HCV infection in hemodialysis patients was reduced in our dialysis center. Avoidance blood transfusion and infection control of blood purification standard operating procedure are the major ways to prevent transmit HCV in patient with MHD.     

The long-term outcome of hepatitis B infection in hemodialysis patients

Little information on the long-term outcome of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in hemodialysis patients is available. We studied 49 hemodialysis patients, seen at three centers between 1969 and 1985, who developed HBV infection. Patients were studied retrospectively and followed for up to 10 years (mean 52 +/- 5 months). Only 20% (n = 10) of patients converted to hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) negative, the majority of whom did so within 6 months of becoming HBsAg positive. Twenty-nine percent (n = 14) of patients developed chronic elevation of liver enzymes which remitted in one patient. Only one patient died from liver disease. We conclude that HBV infection in hemodialysis patients more often results in persistent antigenemia and chronic elevation of liver enzymes than is the case in patients without kidney disease. However, the risk of death from liver disease is low.     

Chronic hepatitis C virus infection in renal transplant: treatment and outcome

BACKGROUND: Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a common cause of liver disease in post-renal transplant period and causes poor patient and graft survival. We analyzed the effects of antiviral therapy using ribavirin monotherapy or ribavirin in combination with interferon (IFN)-alpha in our kidney transplant recipients with chronic hepatitis C. METHODS: Total of 14 patients received antiviral therapy, all of whom had stable graft function, raised aminotransferases and positive HCV viremia at the start of treatment. Eight patients received ribavirin alone for a period of six months to two yr, in doses of 400-800 mg daily. Five patients received IFN-alpha therapy for a period of two months to 1.5 yr, in doses of 1.5 million units daily or three million units thrice weekly with ribavirin. One patient received pegylated IFN 50 microg once weekly in combination with ribavirin. The response was seen in terms of biochemical and virological improvement at the end of study period. RESULTS: In patients treated with ribavirin alone (n = 8), mean alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels before and after treatment were significantly different (198.4 +/- 147.6 and 104.8 +/- 66.5 IU/L respectively; p < 0.05). ALT levels normalized completely in three patients at the end of treatment, improved in three patients and deteriorated in two. Only in one of eight patients on ribavirin alone, HCV-RNA became negative after six months of treatment while in the rest (n = 7) HCV-RNA continued to be positive. In subjects on IFN plus ribavirin (n = 6), the mean ALT levels decreased significantly (from 280.2 +/- 114.9 IU/L at baseline to 71 +/- 49 IU/L at end of therapy; p < 0.05). Two patients had sustained remission (33.3%) on IFN plus ribavirin (persistently negative HCV-RNA), two patients relapsed after initial remission and in two patients treatment was stopped after two months because of graft dysfunction. Totally four patients developed graft dysfunction at some time during the course of IFN therapy (66.6%), but it was discontinued in only two (33.3%). All patients regained normal creatinine levels after discontinuation of IFN, although one patient developed chronic allograft nephropathy as shown by kidney biopsy. Four patients in IFN group developed leucopenia. Two patients developed severe anemia one of whom required blood transfusion and one developed severe flu-like syndrome requiring stoppage of therapy. CONCLUSION: Ribavirin monotherapy in renal transplant recipients with chronic hepatitis C infection results in good biochemical response but is not associated with virological clearance. IFN in combination with ribavirin is effective in two-thirds of patients after a minimum therapy of six months, but it is poorly tolerated, results in graft dysfunction in significant number of patients, and relapse can occur after stopping treatment.     

Hepatitis G virus infection in chronic dialysis patients and kidney transplant recipients

Background: The cloning of the hepatitis G virus (HGV), a novel RNA virus of the Flaviviridae family, has been very recently developed. HGV is known to be parenterally transmitted and has been detected in several patients with cryptogenic hepatitis. However, little information exists about the epidemiology of HGV infection in renal patients. We studied 178 chronic dialysis patients and 11 renal transplant individuals to evaluate prevalence risk factors and clinical manifestations of HGV infection in this population. Method: Hepatitis G virus infection has been detected by a modified PCR technology which incorporates digoxigenin-labelled nucleotides into the amplicon. Primers from the non-coding region and the NS-5 region of HGV are utilized for a single round amplification. Using a streptavidin surface and a biotin-labelled capture probe the labelled nucleic acid is bound through the capture probe to the surface, and the amplified nucleic acid is detected using antibody to digoxigenin. Results: HGV RNA was detected in 6% of chronic haemodialysis (HD) patients (11/172), 36% of renal transplant recipients (4/11), and 17% (1/6) of patients on peritoneal dialysis treatment (CAPD). There were no significant differences between HGV positive and negative patients on chronic HD treatment with regard to several demographic, biochemical and virological features. However, the frequency of anti-HCV antibody was significantly higher in HGV-positive than HGV-negative patients (9/11 (82%) vs 51/161 (32%), P=0.006). In the whole group of HGV RNA-positive patients, 78% (11/14) had a history of blood transfusion requirements, 14/16 (87%) had co-infection with HCV, and 1 (6%) had co-infection with HBsAg. There was no significant association between HCV genotypes and HGV RNA positivity. Six (27.5%) of 16 HGV RNA-positive patients showed raised aminotransferase values in serum. Conclusion: Patients on maintenance dialysis and kidney transplant recipients are at increased risk of HGV infection; HGV is very frequently associated to hepatitis C co-infection, regardless of HCV genotype. HGV may be transmitted by blood transfusions but transmission routes other than transfusion are possible; 37.5% of HGV RNA-positive patients showed raised serum amoinotransferase levels. Further investigations are necessary to clarify the role of HGV infection in the development of liver disease in this clinical setting.     

Hepatitis C virus infection and kidney transplantation

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is an important problem in the patient with end-stage renal disease. After transplantation, liver disease is more frequent in HCV-positive patients than in HCV-negative patients. In the long run, this leads to important liver complications. The patients have a higher risk for developing proteinuria and infections. Long-term patient and graft survival rates are lower in HCV-positive patients than in HCV-negative graft recipients. Mortality is higher, mainly as a result of liver disease and infections. Despite this, transplantation is the best option for the HCV-positive patient with end-stage renal disease. Transplantation of HCV-positive kidneys should be offered to HCV-positive recipients in whom HCV RNA is detected in the serum. Finally, several measures after transplantation minimize the consequences of HCV infection. Adjustment of immunosuppression and careful follow-up in the outpatient clinic for early detection of proteinuria, infection, or worsening of liver disease are mandatory.     

Leukopenia and thrombocytopenia in hemodialysis patients with hepatitis B or C virus infection and non-hemodialysis patients with hepatitis cirrhosis

AIMS: To investigate the relation of leukopenia and thrombocytopenia in hemodialysis (HD) patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 86 HD patients with hepatitis B surface antigen-negative and hepatitis C antibody-negative, 28 HD patients with hepatitis C antibody-positive, 22 HD patients with hepatitis B surface antigen-positive, 78 non-HD patients with hepatitis B-induced liver cirrhosis and 38 non-hemodialysis patients with hepatitis C-induced liver cirrhosis. The following parameters were checked: anti-HCV, hepatitis B surface antigen, hemoglobin, hematocrit, white blood cells, platelets, calcium, phosphate, iron, ferritin, albumin, globulin, aspartate transaminase (AST), alanine transaminase (ALT) and C-reactive protein. The history of blood transfusions, medications, erythropoietin doses and adequate dialysis (KTNV) for 6 consecutive months was also recorded from charts. RESULTS: The HD patients with positive serum anti-HCV and non-HD patients with hepatitis B- or C-induced liver cirrhosis had higher prevalences of leukopenia (39.3%, 43.6% and 50% vs. 15.1%; p < 0.001) and thrombocytopenia (67.9%, 89.7% and 81.6% vs. 34.9%: p < 0.001) than HD patients with serum anti-HCV(-)HbsAg(-). The WBC (4,432 +/- 1,394, 4,792 +/- 2,263 and 4,624 2,446 vs. 5,590 +/- 1,500/mm3; p < 0.001) and platelet counts (140 +/- 45, 80 +/- 50 and 89 +/- 65 vs. 186 +/- 62 x 10(3)/mm3; p < 0.001) of HD patients with positive serum anti-HCV and non-HD patients with hepatitis B- or C-induced cirrhosis were also lower than HD patients without anti-HCV antibody. The liver cirrhosis patients had more thrombocytopenia than the HD patients with anti-HCV(+). The WBC and platelet counts did not vary between HD patients with HbsAg(+) and HD patients with anti-HCV(-)HBsAg(-). The durations of HD, hepatitis and liver cirrhosis were not related to the leukopenia or thrombocytopenia (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: HCV infection associated with leukopenia and/or thrombocytopenia in HD patients is as common as in non-HD patients with liver cirrhosis. This may be due to the direct effect of hemopoiesis rather than the hyperspleenism of liver cirrhosis patients. There is a need for further prospective investigation to ascertain the clinical significance of leukopenia and thrombocytopenia in HD patients with anti-HCV(+). The prevalence of leukopenia and thrombocytopenia was higher in HD patients with hepatitis C than in HD patients with hepatitis B and HD patient without hepatitis.     

Different impacts of hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus on the outcome of kidney transplantation

Previous studies had shown that HBV and HCV infections lead to increased morbidity and mortality after kidney transplantation when compared with the nonhepatitis group. However, few studies have compared the impact among a population with a high prevalence of HBV and HCV infections. We studied the outcomes of 346 recipients including 23 HBsAg (+) patients (6.6%; group 1), 22 patients with anti-HCV+ (6.3%, group 2), and 301 nonhepatitis patients (group 3) in a single center during a 6-year period. No patient had evidence of precirrhosis or cirrhosis before transplant. The primary end point was graft and patient survival rates. Secondary end point was the rate of progression of chronic allograft, nephropathy. The median follow-up time was 3.7 (0.5-6.8) years. Five-year actuarial graft survival was 80% for group 1, 61% for group 2, and 88 % for group 3 (P = .005). Cox regression showed HCV (hazards ratio 2.96; 95% CI = 1.03-8.51) and acute rejection episode (HR 3.01; 95%CI = 1.86-4.87) to be significant predictors of graft survival. Actuarial 5-year patient survival of group 1 was significantly lower than group 2 or group 3 (79 % vs 89% and 96%; P = .003). Cox regression revealed that the hazards ratio of HBV for death was 7.63 (95%CI = 1.88-30.86; P = .004). In contrast, HCV infection had no significant effect on patient survival (HR 1.59; 95%CI = 0.28-9.02). The rate of chronic allograft nephropathy progression was significantly faster in group 1 (-6.74 mL/min per year) and group 2 (-6.14 mL/min per year) than the controls. We concluded that HBV infection decreased patient survival earlier than HCV and that HCV decreased graft survival more significantly than HBV. Both HBV and HCV were associated with rapid progression of chronic allograft nephropathy. HBV was the strongest risk factor for mortality compared with HCV, with acute rejection episode, with diabetes mellitus, or other hazardous factors.     

Occult hepatitis B virus infection in hemodialysis patients with chronic HCV infection

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of occult hepatitis B infection in hemodialysis patients with chronic HCV infection and to compare it with that of HCV-infected patients with normal renal function. METHODS: Forty-nine patients on maintenance hemodialysis and 48 HCV-infected but otherwise normal patients, both groups HCV RNA-positive and HBsAg-negative and matched for age and sex, were evaluated for the presence of HBV DNA in serum by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). A proportion of patients (11/49 and 39/48, respectively) were also examined for HBV antigens in hepatocytes by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: HBV DNA was detected by PCR in 10/49 (20.4%) hemodialysis patients and in 3/48 (6.3%) patients with normal renal function (p=0.041). HBV DNA concentrations were low (<10 3 copies/mL) in both groups. HBV DNA-positive hemodialysis patients had a significantly lower prevalence of past HBV vaccination and lower anti-HBs titers in serum than HBV DNA-negative patients of the same group. No positive staining for HBsAg or HbcAg was observed in the liver biopsies of either group. CONCLUSIONS: Occult HBV infection is more frequent in HCV-infected hemodialysis patients than otherwise normal patients with chronic HCV infection, probably because of impaired immune function in uremic patients and high risk of parenteral exposure to HBV. The clinical significance of this finding is unknown, but HBV vaccination of hemodialysis patients and staff could be an effective way of limiting the risk of transmission of HBV infection within dialysis units.     

Hepatitis B virus infection in heart transplant recipients in a hepatitis B endemic area.

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is hyperendemic in Taiwan. It is almost impossible for us to reject organ donors or recipients with positive serum hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg). We report our experience with HBV infection in heart transplant recipients with particular attention to outcome of recipients who were HBsAg+ or who had received donor hearts from HBsAg+ donors. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of medical records. RESULTS: In the study, we included 101 heart recipients with post-transplant survival of more than 6 months. According to pre-transplant HBV serology markers, we divided patients into 4 groups. Group 1 (n = 8) had been HBsAg+ at the time of heart transplantation. Of these, 6 patients had HBV reactivation in the post-transplant follow-up and needed lamivudine treatment. Complete response was achieved in all 6 patients; however, HBV recurrence occurred in 1 patient after 8 months of lamivudine treatment. The recurrence remained under partial control. Group 2 (n = 16) was HBV na?ve at the time of heart transplantation. Of these, 2 received HBsAg+ donor hearts under perioperative hepatitis B immunoglobulin prophylaxis. HBV infection was successfully prevented in 1 patient, but the other contracted HBV hepatitis, which was successfully treated with lamivudine. In Group 2, 10 patients received donor hearts from anti-HBs+ donors, and none contracted HBV hepatitis after transplantation. Group 3 (n = 55) had protective anti-HBs antibody at the time of heart transplantation either from previous HBV vaccination (n = 10) or from natural HGB infection (n = 45). HBsAg+ donor hearts were transplanted into 2 patients with anti-HBs from previous HBV vaccination, and into 8 patients with anti-HBs form natural HBV infection. However, none of these 10 patients who received HBsAg+ donor hearts had HBV hepatitis after transplantation. Group 4 (n = 22) was HBs-, anti-HBs-, and anti-HBc+ at the time of heart transplantation. Of these, 7 patients received HBsAg+ donor hearts. Six patients experienced no HBV hepatitis after heart transplantation, and serum HBV DNA by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) at the time of heart transplantation was negative in all 6 patients. One patient had HBV hepatitis after transplantation, and serum HBV DNA by PCR at the time of heart transplantation also was positive. CONCLUSION: HBV reactivation after the heart transplantation was common but usually well controlled with lamivudine treatment. Therefore, HBV carrier status should not contraindicate heart transplantation. HBsAg+ donor hearts were safely transplanted into anti-HBs+ recipients; therefore, HBsAg+ itself was not a contraindication to heart donation. Patients with HBsAg-, anti-HBs-, anti-HBc+, and negative HBV DNA in the serum by PCR could be protected from HBV infection from HBsAg+ donor hearts. However, patients with HBsAg-, anti-HBs-, anti-HBc+, and positive HBV DNA in the serum by PCR should be recognized as HBV carriers and closely followed for potential HBV flare-up after heart transplantation.     

乙型肝炎病毒和丙型肝炎病毒感染对肾移植受者存活的影响

目的探讨乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)和(或)丙型肝炎病毒(hepatitis C virus,HCV)感染对肾移植受者长期存活的影响及预防措施。方法 HBV和(或)HCV感染肾移植受者110例(感染组),其中HBV感染受者56例、HCV感染受者52例,HBV与HCV合并感染2例。非HBV与非HCV感染受者694例(非感染组)。感染组受者术前有病毒复制者予积极治疗,研究早期肝功能正常者可接受肾移植,后期均用聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测,要求连续3～6个月HBV脱氧核糖核酸(DNA)0copy/ml,HCV核糖核酸(RNA)0copy/ml方可接受肾移植。术后定期检测HBV与HCV,定期检测感染组受者HBVDNA滴度、HCVRNA滴度。发现HBV复制,选用拉米夫定、阿德福韦酯治疗,酌情减少免疫抑制剂用量。分别比较两组术后1、3、5年人、肾存活率,比较两组的肝功能衰竭病死率。结果非感染组人、肾存活率分别为:1年94.2%、91.4%,3年为86.4%、85.2%,5年为82.7%、78.9%;感染组人、肾存活率分别为:1年90.2%、88.1%,3年为88.9%、86.2%,5年为81.5%、76.3%;两组数据比较差异均无统计学意义(均为P>0.05)。感染组中14例(12.7%)死于肝功能衰竭,其中10例为HBV感染者,非感染组受者无1例死于肝衰竭。感染组术后肝衰竭病死率明显高于非感染组(12.7%、0,P<0.05)。结论受者术前HBV和(或)HCV感染会明显增加肾移植术后肝衰竭死亡危险。患者术前处于病毒复制期应予积极治疗,在肝炎病毒停止复制6个月后再考虑肾移植。长期随访中应定期复查HBV与HCV感染指标,早确诊、早治疗,并及时调整免疫抑制剂剂量。