Role of contrast-enhanced helical CT in the evaluation of acute thoracic aortic injuries after blunt chest trauma

The purpose of this retrospective study was to determine the value of contrast-enhanced helical CT for detecting and managing acute thoracic aortic injury (ATAI). Between June 1995 and February 2000, 1419 consecutive chest CT examinations were performed in the setting of major blunt trauma. The following CT findings were considered indicative of ATAI: intimal flap; pseudoaneurysm; contour irregularity; lumen abnormality; and extravasation of contrast material. On the basis of these direct findings no further diagnostic investigations were performed. Isolated mediastinal hematoma on CT scans was considered an indirect sign of ATAI: In these cases, thoracic aortography was performed even if CT indicated normal aorta. Seventy-seven patients had abnormal CT scans: Among the 23 patients with direct CT signs, acute thoracic aortic injuries was confirmed at thoracotomy in 21. Two false-positive cases were observed. The 54 remaining patients had isolated mediastinal hematoma without aortic injuries at CT and corresponding negative angiograms. The 1342 patients with negative CT scans were included in the 8-month follow-up program and did not show any adverse sequela based on clinical and radiographic criteria. Contrast-enhanced helical CT has a critical role in the exclusion of thoracic aortic injuries in patient with major blunt chest trauma and prevents unnecessary thoracic aortography. Direct CT signs of ATAI do not require further diagnostic investigations to confirm the diagnosis: Isolated aortic bands or contour vessel abnormalities should be first considered as possible artifacts or related to non-traumatic etiologies especially when mediastinal hematoma is absent. In cases of isolated mediastinal hematoma other possible sources of bleeding should be considered before directing patients to thoracic aortography.     

Direct findings of aortic injury on contrast-enhanced CT in surgically proven traumatic aortic injury: a multi-centre review

OBJECTIVE: To review the contrast-enhanced CT findings in surgically proven traumatic aortic injury (TAI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched the trauma registries of three academic medical centres from 1994 to 2000 and found 34 patients with surgically proven TAI that received pre-operative contrast-enhanced chest CT. Two chest radiologists recorded by consensus the size and location of direct (pseudoaneurysm, intimal flap) and indirect (mediastinal haematoma) findings of TAI. The imaging findings were correlated with surgical reports. RESULTS: Direct findings of aortic injury (pseudoaneurysm or intimal flap) were seen on contrast enhanced CT in all patients and confirmed at surgery. Specifically, a pseudoaneurysm was seen in 33 (97%), presenting either as a focal bulge in 22 (65%) or as more diffuse aneurysmal enlargement in 11 (32%). An intimal flap was identified in 31 cases (91%). A periaortic haematoma was seen in 31 cases (91%). In the three patients without periaortic haematoma, the only indications of aortic injury were a focal pseudoaneurysm in two (6%) and an intimal flap in one (3%). CONCLUSION: In this series of surgically proven TAI, direct findings of aortic injury were seen in all cases. Aortic tear occurred without mediastinal haematoma in 9% (3/34) of patients.     

Making the transition: the role of helical CT in the evaluation of potentially acute thoracic aortic injuries

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to show that helical CT could be used at our center in lieu of routine aortography to examine patients who have had serious blunt chest trauma. We also wanted to assess the potential savings of using CT to avoid unnecessary aortography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The institutional review board approved the parallel imaging-CT immediately followed by aortography-of patients presenting with blunt chest trauma between August 1997 and August 1998. To screen patients for potential aortic injuries, we performed parallel imaging on 142 patients, and these patients comprised our patient population. CT examinations of the patients were reviewed for signs of injury by radiologists who were unaware of each other's interpretations and the aortographic results. Findings of CT examinations were classified as negative, positive, or inconclusive for injury. Aortography was performed immediately after CT. The technical and professional fees for both transcatheter aortography and helical CT were also compared. RESULTS: Our combined kappa value for all CT interpretations was 0.714. The aortographic sensitivity and negative predictive value were both 100%. Likewise, the sensitivity and negative predictive value of CT were 100%. The total costs of performing aortography were estimated at approximately $402,900, whereas those for performing helical CT were estimated at $202,800. CONCLUSION: Helical CT has a sensitivity and negative predictive value equivalent to that of aortography. Using CT to eliminate the possibility of mediastinal hematoma and to evaluate the cause of an abnormal aortic contour in a trauma patient allows us to use aortography more selectively. Avoiding the performance of unnecessary aortography will expedite patient care and reduce costs. We report the results of our experience with CT and how our center successfully made this transition in the initial examination of patients with serious thoracic trauma.     

Can chest CT be used to exclude aortic injury?

PURPOSE: To determine whether chest computed tomography (CT) can be used to exclude aortic injury. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients in whom there was very high suspicion of traumatic aortic injury were examined with aortography only. Other patients were examined with contrast material-enhanced CT. Follow-up aortography was performed in all patients with moderate to high suspicion of traumatic aortic injury and in all patients with CT scans that were positive for traumatic aortic injury. CT scans were regarded as positive when they showed mediastinal hematoma or direct findings of aortic injury. During a 4 1/2-year period, 1,009 patients (263 female, 746 male; age range, 3-90 years) were evaluated for possible traumatic aortic injury. RESULTS: Of the 207 patients who underwent aortography directly without CT, 10 had traumatic aortic injury. Of the 802 patients who were examined with CT, 382 underwent follow-up aortography. In this group, there were 10 true-positive and no false-negative CT scans. CT had 100% sensitivity and a 100% negative predictive value for the detection of traumatic aortic injury.     

Periaortic hematoma at diaphragmatic crura at helical CT: sign of blunt aortic injury in patients with mediastinal hematoma

PURPOSE: To evaluate periaortic hematoma (PH) near the level of the diaphragm at abdominal computed tomography (CT) as an indirect sign of acute traumatic aortic injury after blunt trauma in patients with mediastinal hematoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 1998 to 2001, 97 patients with CT evidence of mediastinal hematoma after blunt thoracic trauma were retrospectively identified at two level 1 trauma centers. The presence or absence of PH near the level of the diaphragmatic crura was retrospectively established by a blinded reviewer at each institution. Aortic injury status was determined by reviewing angiographic, surgical, and clinical records. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative productive values, and positive and negative likelihood ratios were calculated. RESULTS: Among the 97 patients with mediastinal hematoma, 14 had both PH near the level of the diaphragm and aortic injury; six had aortic injuries without PH, five had PH near the level of the diaphragm without aortic injury, and 72 had no evidence of PH near the diaphragm and no aortic injury. Sensitivity for PH near the level of the diaphragm as a sign of aortic injury was 70%; specificity, 94%; positive predictive value, 74%; and negative predictive value, 92%. The positive likelihood ratio for the presence of aortic injury was 10.8, and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.3. CONCLUSION: PH near the level of the diaphragmatic crura is an insensitive but relatively specific sign for aortic injury after blunt trauma. The presence of this sign at abdominal CT should prompt imaging of the thoracic aorta to evaluate potential thoracic aortic injury.     

Application of spiral computerized tomography in the study of traumatic lesions of the thoracic aorta

PURPOSE: Acute thoracic aortic injuries account for up to 10-20% of fatalities in high-speed deceleration road accidents and have an estimated immediate fatality rate of 80-90%. Untreated survivors to acute trauma (10-20%) have a dismal prognosis: 30% of them die within 6 hours, 40-50% die within 24 hours, and 90% within 4 months. We investigated the diagnostic accuracy of Helical Computed Tomography (Helical CT) in acute traumatic injuries of the thoracic aorta, and the role of this technique in the diagnostic management of trauma patients with a strong suspicion of aortic rupture. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We compared retrospectively the chest Helical CT findings of 256 trauma patients examined June 1995 through August 1999. All patients underwent a plain chest radiograph in supine recumbency when admitted to the Emergency Room. Chest Helical CT examinations were performed according to trauma score, to associated traumatic lesions and to plain chest radiographic findings. All the examinations were performed with no intravenous contrast agent administration and the pitch 2 technique. After a previous baseline study, contrast-enhanced scans were acquired with pitch 1 in 87 patients. All examinations were assessed for the presence of mediastinal hematoma, periaortic hematoma, traumatic pseudodiverticulum, irregular aortic wall or contour and intimal flap as signs of aortic rupture. RESULTS: Helical CT showed thoracic aortic lesions in 9 of 256 patients examined. In all the 9 cases we found a mediastinal hematoma and all of them had positive plain chest radiographic findings of mediastinal enlargement. Moreover, in 6 cases aortic knob blurring was also evident on plain chest film and in 5 cases depressed left mainstem bronchus and trachea deviation rightwards were observed. All aortic lesions were identified on axial scans and located at the isthmus of level. Aortic rupture was always depicted as pseudodiverticulum of the proximal descending tract and intimal flap. We also found periaortic hematoma in 6 cases and intramural hematoma in 1 case. There were no false positive results in our series: 7 patients with Helical CT diagnosis of aortic rupture were submitted to conventional aortography that confirmed both type and extension of the lesions as detected by Helical CT, and all findings were confirmed by gross inspection at surgery. No false negative results have been recorded so far: untreated aortic ruptures are fatal within 4 months in 90% of patients, or they may evolve into chronic pseudoaneurysm in about 5% of survivors. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience Helical CT had much higher diagnostic sensitivity and specificity than plain chest radiography. In agreement with larger published series, in our small one the diagnostic accuracy of Helical CT was 100% in the evaluation of traumatic aortic ruptures. Moreover, Helical CT is faster and less invasive than conventional aortography, which makes this diagnostic modality increasingly used and markedly improves the management of the serious trauma patient. The more widespread use of this diagnostic tool has permitted to standardize the technique and now Helical CT can be used not only as a screening modality for patients that undergo digital aortography, but also as a reliable diagnostic method for surgical planning.     

Unenhanced dynamic mediastinal computed tomography in the selection of patients requiring thoracic aortography for the detection of acute traumatic aortic injury

In our institution, the selection of patients who require thoracic aortography to evaluate for acute traumatic aortic injury (ATAI) is based upon an appropriate mechanism of injury and radiologic demonstration of a mediastinal hematoma. When plain chest or chest and/or mediastinal radiographs demonstrate a mediastinal hematoma, the patient undergoes thoracic aortography as promptly as is clinically feasible. If the plain film studies are negative for mediastinal hematoma, thoracic aortography is not performed because the patient is presumed not to have an ATAI. When the plain film studies are equivocal and the patient is stable, unenhanced computed tomography (CT) of the mediastinum is used to evaluate for a mediastinal hematoma. CT signs of a mediastinal hematoma include a soft tissue density, representing the hematoma admixed with mediastinal fat, which obscures or obliterates the normal aortic-mediastinal fat interface; hematoma admixed with fat of the right paratracheal stripe causing increased width and density of the stripe; and hematoma surrounding, and frequently displacing, the esophagus to the right of its normal position. Six of 36 patients (17%) with mediastinal hematoma demonstrated by unenhanced mediastinal CT had ATAI by thoracic aortography and confirmed surgically. The thoracic aortograms of the remaining 30 of 36 patients (83%) were negative. Sixty-three of 100 patients (63%) with equivocal plain chest or mediastinal radiographs had negative mediastinum by unenhanced CT. All 63 patients (100%) with normal mediastinal CT and who did not have thoracic aortography were discharged from the hospital 1–42 days (mean, 9.3 days) post-injury without clinical or radiographic signs of aortic rupture. Supported in part by the John S. Dunn Research Foundation.     

Role of CT in excluding major arterial injury after blunt thoracic trauma

The role of CT in the diagnosis of major vascular rupture following blunt decelerating chest trauma is controversial. Its value in excluding major arterial injury has not yet been determined. During a 12-month period we obtained dynamic enhanced thoracic CT studies in 20 patients with blunt decelerating thoracic trauma who had abnormal or equivocal mediastinal contours on chest radiographs. In all cases diagnosis was confirmed by either digital subtraction (18 patients) or conventional thoracic angiography (two patients). CT scans showed evidence of direct aortic injury in three patients and evidence of mediastinal hematoma in five others. Four of these eight patients had major arterial injury verified angiographically and at surgery. In two patients the CT scan was considered equivocal; both patients had normal thoracic angiograms. CT excluded direct vascular injury or mediastinal hematoma in 10 patients. All 10 had normal thoracic angiograms. This preliminary study suggests that, in patients sustaining blunt decelerating thoracic trauma, thoracic CT may be more valuable than chest radiography in excluding major vascular injury and, in some cases, may reduce the need for thoracic angiography.     

主动脉壁内血肿的多层面螺旋CT诊断

目的:评价多层面螺旋CT诊断主动脉壁内血肿的价值.材料和方法:对23例怀疑主动脉病变的患者进行多层面螺旋CT扫描并诊断为主动脉壁内血肿.两名有经验的心血管放射医师按照CT标准做出诊断.使用16排多层面螺旋CT获得1.25mm层厚(1mm重建间隔)图像,应用多平面重建、曲面重建、最大密度投影和容积重建等方法显示壁内血肿及穿透溃疡.结果:23例主动脉壁内血肿中,1例A型,22例B型;B型壁内血肿中,仅累及降主动脉的8例,胸腹主动脉受累11例,局限于腹主动脉3例;11壁内血肿伴主动脉穿透溃疡,其中2例行带膜内支架治疗.结论:多层面螺旋CT能为主动脉壁内血肿的诊断、鉴别诊断和治疗提供重要信息.     

Computed tomography evaluation of traumatic rupture of the thoracic aorta: an outcome study.

OBJECTIVE: [corrected] To assess the long-term outcome of blunt trauma patients with suspected thoracic aortic or great vessel injury that was evaluated with contrast-enhanced chest computed tomography (CT). METHODS: We studied the outcome of 278 consecutive patients who received contrast-enhanced CT for blunt chest trauma with computerized searches of the regional trauma database, hospital medical records, universal government medical coverage plan billing records, and regional vital statistics databases. Data retrieved included patient demographics, mechanism of injury, status of the aorta and proximal great vessels at contrast-enhanced CT, hospital discharge diagnoses, and outpatient procedural billings with specific attention to aortic or great vessel injury. Median follow-up was 615 days following the traumatic event. RESULTS: Six subjects demonstrated direct signs of aortic or proximal great vessel injury on contrast-enhanced chest CT, as follows: aortic pseudoaneurysm and intimal flap (n = 4), carotid artery dissection (n = 1), and aortic dissection (n = 1). All were surgically treated, except the patient with aortic dissection, who was treated medically. In the other subjects, contrast-enhanced CT was negative (n = 230) or showed isolated mediastinal hematoma (n = 42). The computerized searches of the medical databases showed that none of these 272 subjects had procedures for, or died from, aortic or great vessel injury during the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: Computerized searches of medical databases found no evidence of missed thoracic aortic or proximal great vessel injury in blunt trauma patients who were evaluated with contrast-enhanced chest CT.     

64层螺旋CT在纵隔血肿诊断中的价值

目的评价64层螺旋CT在纵隔血肿合并其他脏器损伤诊断中的应用价值。方法回顾性分析经临床与手术证实的11例纵隔血肿患者的完整CT资料。结果前纵隔血肿5例,中纵隔血肿4例,后纵隔血肿2例;弥漫性血肿8例,局限性血肿3例。CT平扫发现纵隔血肿合并气胸、肋骨骨折等合并征4例,而螺旋CT多平面重建（multiplanar reconstruction,MPR）发现气胸、肋骨骨折及胸骨体骨折、颅脑外伤等7例。结论纵隔内心脏、大血管的损伤常导致弥漫性血肿,而小血管的损伤常导致纵隔内血肿呈局限性。螺旋CT扫描尤其多平面重建不仅能显示血肿的直接征象,而且还能同时发现伴发的其他损伤。因此,能为临床及时确诊和正确治疗提供可靠信息。     

Diagnosis and treatment planning of acute aortic emergencies using a handheld DICOM viewer

Acute aortic syndromes and traumatic aortic injury are often diagnosed on CT angiography, possibly requiring emergent intervention. Advances in handheld computing have created the possibility of viewing full DICOM datasets from a remote location. We evaluated the ability to diagnose and characterize acute aortic pathologies on CT angiograms of the thorax using an iPhone-based DICOM viewer. This study was performed after Institutional Review Board approval. Fifteen CT angiograms of the thorax in suspected acute aortic syndromes were evaluated by three blinded radiologists on a handheld device using a DICOM viewer. Studies were evaluated for the ability to identify and classify aortic dissection, transection, or intramural hematoma, measure aortic dimensions, and identify mediastinal hematoma, arch variants, and pulmonary pathology. Studies were compared to blinded interpretations on a dedicated PACS workstation. The aortic pathology was correctly identified as aortic transection/pseudoaneurysm (n?=?5), type A dissection (n?=?2), and type A intramural hematoma (n?=?1) by all reviewers, with no false-positive interpretations. This represents a sensitivity and specificity of 100 %. Mediastinal hematoma (n?=?6), pneumothorax (five right, three left), and arch vessel involvement (n?=?2) were identified in all cases. There was 88.5 % accuracy in identifying arch variants. Measurement of the size of the involved aortic segment was similar on handheld device and PACS workstation; however the adjacent normal aorta was 1.2?±?1.0 mm larger on the handheld device (p?=?0.03). Handheld DICOM viewers may be useful for emergent consultations and triage, and may expedite preprocedure planning to reduce the time interval between diagnostic scan and therapeutic intervention.     

Evaluation of emergency CT scans of the head: is there a community standard?

OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to assess the accuracy of general radiologists in the interpretation via teleradiology of emergency CT scans of the head. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied the interpretations of 716 consecutive emergency CT scans of the head by a group of 15 board-certified general radiologists practicing in the community (as opposed to an academic setting). The scans were sent via teleradiology, and the preliminary interpretations were made. Three of the general radiologists were functioning as nighthawks, and the remaining 12 were acting as on-call radiologists in addition to their normal daytime duties. Each CT examination was interpreted by one of five neuroradiologists the day after the initial interpretation had been performed. The findings of the final interpretation and the preliminary interpretation were categorized as showing agreement, insignificant disagreement, or significant disagreement. The reports in the two categories indicating disagreement were reviewed and reclassified by a consensus of three university-based neuroradiologists. RESULTS: Agreement between the initial interpretation by the general radiologist and the final interpretation by the neuroradiologist was found in 95% of the CT scans. The interpretations were judged to show insignificant disagreement in 3% (23/716) of the scans and to show significant disagreement in 2% (16/716). Of the 16 significant errors, five were false-positive findings and 11 were false-negative findings. Forty-seven CT scans depicted significant or active disease, and in 11 (23%) of these scans, the final report differed significantly from the preliminary interpretation. Three patients had pituitary masses, none of which had been described on the preliminary interpretation. CONCLUSION: The rate of significant discordance between board-certified on-call general radiologists and neuroradiologists in the interpretation of emergency CT scans was 2%, which was comparable to previously published reports of residents' performance. The pituitary gland may be a blind spot, and additional attention should be focused on this area.     

Mathematical modeling improves computed tomography diagnosis of traumatic aortic injury

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Acute traumatic aorta injuries (ATAIs) following blunt thoracic trauma require rapid and accurate diagnosis for institution of lifesaving treatment. The use of computed tomography (CT) in the diagnosis of such injuries continues to improve and has the potential to become the diagnostic modality of choice in many trauma centers. A standardized diagnostic model may contribute to improvements in radiologist interpretation of CT for ATAIs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The following diagnostic criteria were used to develop a diagnostic model for ATAIs: 11 areas of potential hematoma formation were identified in the mediastinum. Maximum short- and long-axis cross-sectional diameters of the aorta were measured. Qualitative morphologic information (contour change, intimal flap) was recorded. Smoothness of the aorta wall was assessed. These characteristics were quantified and analyzed for statistical significance, allowing for the development of an injury assessment model. RESULTS: The diagnostic model was used to score 69 blunt thoracic trauma patient cases. Average weighted kappa was 0.74, showing strong agreement among two observers and reproducibility of the model. The model improved injury assessment by classifying equivocal cases as either positive or negative. The ROC curve calculated from the original radiologist interpretation contained 86.1% area under the curve, while the curve for the new model contained 97.5%. The likelihood ratio increased from 30.06 to 48.67. The degree to which the new measure improved prediction over the original radiologist reading was tested using a nested model and yielded a reliable increment in model fit (chi2 analysis: Deltachi2(3) = 20.929, P < or = .0001). Finally, beta weights calculated from each variable were used to create a quantitative best-fit diagnostic model for future use. CONCLUSION: We have developed a diagnostic tool that may help radiologists better evaluate CT for ATAIs.     

主动脉壁内血肿的64层螺旋CT诊断价值

目的：评价64层螺旋CT对主动脉壁内血肿的价值及优势。方法：采用64层螺旋CT,连续容积增强扫描,对32例主诉急性胸背痛患者行CT检查并诊断为壁内血肿。结果：32例按Stanford分型：A型8例,B型24例。其直接征象：沿主动脉壁的环形或新月形低密度影,无撕裂的内膜片。间接征象：钙化的动脉壁内移10例,溃疡18例,主动脉粥样硬化改变8例。并发胸腔积液3例。结论：螺旋CT血管成像技术可以在无创或微创的情况下清晰地显示壁内血肿,为临床诊断和治疗提供有价值的依据。     

Evaluation of traumatic aortic injury: does dynamic contrast-enhanced CT play a role?

To investigate the value of 5-mm contrast material-enhanced computed tomography (CT) in patients with moderate to low probability of aortic laceration after a substantial deceleration injury, scans were obtained through the upper mediastinum in 160 consecutive patients. Thoracic angiography and aortography were performed in patients with evidence of mediastinal hemorrhage at CT. There was no evidence of mediastinal hemorrhage in 132 patients with normal admission chest radiographs. In the 28 patients with abnormal admission chest radiographs, CT helped exclude mediastinal hemorrhage in 22 patients (78%), and 19 patients (68%) were treated without undergoing angiography. Six patients had mediastinal hematoma at CT. Only one had an aortic laceration at angiography. The authors conclude that 5-mm contrast-enhanced CT can help exclude mediastinal hemorrhage and reduce the angiography rate in low-to-moderate-risk patients with a widened or indeterminate mediastinum. There were no unsuspected cases of mediastinal hemorrhage in patients with normal chest radiographs. Angiography is recommended for patients considered to be at high risk for aortic laceration.     

Advances in Imaging and Management Trends of Traumatic Aortic Injuries

CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology - Acute traumatic aortic injury (ATAI) is a life-threatening injury. CT is the imaging tool of choice, and the knowledge of direct and indirect signs of...     

Focal arterial injuries of the proximal extremities: helical CT arteriography as the initial method of diagnosis

PURPOSE: To present our experience with helical computed tomographic (CT) arteriography as the initial diagnostic examination in patients suspected to have focal arterial injuries of the proximal extremities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: During 19 months, 142 arterial segments in the proximal portions of the extremities of 139 patients with trauma were evaluated with helical CT arteriography. CT arteriograms were interpreted on site by the radiologist in charge of emergency procedures and retrospectively with consensus interpretation between two radiologists. CT study quality and the presence of arterial injuries were noted. CT arteriographic findings were compared with those of surgery, conventional arteriography, and/or clinical follow-up. RESULTS: Five (3.6%) patients had nondiagnostic studies and underwent conventional arteriography. In the remaining 137 arterial segments in 134 patients, helical CT arteriography demonstrated arterial injuries in 61 segments and normal arteries in 76 segments. These segments were treated initially with surgery (55 segments) or endovascular intervention (four segments) or were observed (78 segments); 77 of the 78 observed segments remained stable at 3-18 months (mean follow-up, 5.2 months). There were no differences between the on-site and consensus interpretations (kappa = 1.0). The sensitivity of CT arteriography was 95.1%, and the specificity was 98.7%. CONCLUSION: Helical CT arteriography can be performed as the initial diagnostic method in most patients suspected to have focal arterial injuries of the proximal portions of the extremities.     

Clinical consequences of misinterpretations of neuroradiologic CT scans by on-call radiology residents

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Studies have looked at the accuracy of radiologic interpretations by radiology residents as compared with staff radiologists with regard to emergency room plain films, emergency room body CT scans, and trauma head CT scans; however, to our knowledge, no study has evaluated on-call resident interpretations of all types of neuroradiologic CT scans. Both as a part of our departmental quality control program and to address concerns of clinical services about misinterpretation of neuroradiologic CT scans by on-call radiology residents, we evaluated the frequency of incorrect preliminary interpretations of neuroradiologic CT scans by on-call radiology residents and the effect of such misinterpretations on clinical management and patient outcome. METHODS: As determined by the staff neuroradiologist the next day, all potentially clinically significant changes to preliminary reports of emergency neuroradiologic CT scans rendered by on-call radiology residents were recorded over a 9-month period. A panel of neuroradiologists reviewed and graded all the changed cases by consensus. An emergency department staff physician reviewed medical records of all submitted cases to determine clinical consequences of the misinterpretations. RESULTS: Significant misinterpretations were made in 21 (0.9%) of 2388 cases during the study period. There was a significant change in patient management in 12 of the cases, with a potentially serious change in patient outcome in two cases (0.08%). CONCLUSION: On-call radiology residents have a low rate of significant misinterpretations of neuroradiologic CT scans, and the potential to affect patient outcome is rare.     

Computed tomographic characteristics of the normal thymus gland: Relationship to mediastinal hematoma

Computed tomography (CT) is frequently used in the screening process to determine the need for angiography in patients with possible blunt thoracic aortic injury. Misinterpretation of normal mediastinal structures (particularly the thymus in patients under age 40 years) as mediastinal hematoma may result in a significant number of false-positive scans. During a 20-month period, we reviewed the chest CT examinations of 1247 patients to select two groups of patients: group I, in whom the mediastinum was normal by CT, and group II, in whom the CT identification of a mediastinal hematoma had been proven surgically. Two major mediastinal CT differences were noted between the groups. The first was a normal cleavage plane between the lateral aspect of the aortic arch and the soft tissue density of the thymus seen in 100% of patients with normal mediastinum (group I) and 0% of patients with known mediastinal hematoma (group II). The second difference relates to the anatomic fact that the thymus is normally present only in the anterior mediastinum. Thus, the presence of a soft tissue density throughout the right paratracheal region of the middle mediastinum, which was seen in 100% of group II (mediastinal hematoma) patients and in 0% of group I (normal) patients, represented blood and not thymus tissue. These results demonstrate fundamental differences in appearance between thymic tissue, regardless of its state of involution, and a mediastinal hematoma on unenhanced mediastinal CT (UMCT). It is important that these differences be recognized so that thymic tissue is not confused with a mediastinal hematoma resulting in unnecessary thoracic aortography. Supported in part by the John S. Dunn Research Foundation.