Lessons learned from one hundred right lobe living donor liver transplants

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the first 100 adult right lobe living donor liver transplants (LDLT) in a single center to determine whether the results have improved with technical modifications and better experience. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Right lobe LDLT has been increasingly performed for adults with end-stage liver disease. Numerous modifications in technique have been introduced, and a learning curve is likely in view of its complexity. METHODS: One hundred consecutive adult right lobe LDLTs performed between May 1996 and May 2002 were retrospectively studied by comparing the first 50 (group 1) with the last 50 cases (group 2). The median follow-up was 37 (27 to 79) months for group 1 and 15 (7 to 27) months for group 2. RESULTS: The characteristics of donors and liver grafts were similar. In group 2, fewer recipients were intensive care unit (ICU)-bound or had hepatorenal syndrome before transplantation, and there was a lower disease severity as shown by a lower Child-Pugh score and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score. Significant improvements were found in the operation time, blood loss, ICU stay, and postoperative complication rate of the donors and in the operation time, transfusion requirements, number of reoperations, ICU stay, and hospital stay of the recipients in group 2. The hospital mortality rate of recipients was reduced from 16% to 0% (P = 0.006). Graft survival rates at 12 months and 24 months were improved from 80% and 74%, respectively, in group 1 to 100% and 96%, respectively, in group 2 (P = 0.002). After adjusting for differences in recipient risk factors (ICU-bound, hepatorenal syndrome, Child-Pugh score, and MELD score) in a multivariate Cox model, recipients in group 2 had significantly lower risk of graft loss (relative risk compared with group 1, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.03 to 0.66; P = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: There is a learning curve in adult right lobe LDLT. The results have significantly improved with technical refinement and better experience.     

One hundred nine living donor liver transplants in adults and children: a single-center experience

OBJECTIVE: To summarize the evolution of a living donor liver transplant program and the authors' experience with 109 cases. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The authors' institution began to offer living donor liver transplants to children in 1993 and to adults in 1998. METHODS: Donors were healthy, ages 18 to 60 years, related or unrelated, and ABO-compatible (except in one case). Donor evaluation was thorough. Liver biopsy was performed for abnormal lipid profiles or a history of significant alcohol use, a body mass index more than 28, or suspected steatosis. Imaging studies included angiography, computed tomography, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, and magnetic resonance imaging. Recipient evaluation and management were the same as for cadaveric transplant. RESULTS: After ABO screening, 136 potential donors were evaluated for 113 recipients; 23 donors withdrew for medical or personal reasons. Four donor surgeries were aborted; 109 transplants were performed. Fifty children (18 years or younger) received 47 left lateral segments and 3 left lobes; 59 adults received 50 right lobes and 9 left lobes. The average donor hospital stay was 6 days. Two donors each required one unit of banked blood. Right lobe donors had three bile leaks from the cut surface of the liver; all resolved. Another right lobe donor had prolonged hyperbilirubinemia. Three donors had small bowel obstructions; two required operation. All donors are alive and well. The most common indications for transplant were biliary atresia in children (56%) and hepatitis C in adults (40%); 35.6% of adults had hepatocellular carcinoma. Biliary reconstructions in all children and 44 adults were with a Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy; 15 adults had duct-to-duct anastomoses. The incidence of major vascular complications was 12% in children and 11.8% in adult recipients. Children had three bile leaks (6%) and six (12%) biliary strictures. Adult patients had 14 (23.7%) bile leaks and 4 (6.8%) biliary strictures. Patient and graft survival rates were 87.6% and 81%, respectively, at 1 year and 75.1% and 69.6% at 5 years. In children, patient and graft survival rates were 89.9% and 85.8%, respectively, at 1 year and 80.9% and 78% at 5 years. In adults, patient and graft survival rates were 85.6% and 77%, respectively, at 1 year. CONCLUSION: Living donor liver transplantation has become an important option for our patients and has dramatically changed our approach to patients with liver failure. The donor surgery is safe and can be done with minimal complications. We expect that living donor liver transplants will represent more than 50% of our transplants within 3 years.     

Factors affecting graft survival after living donor liver transplantation

Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has been considered as an alternative option to resolve the shortage of cadaveric donor organs, despite the ethical aspects of the donor procedure. The objective of this study was to analyze the risk factors affecting graft survival in LDLT. From June 1996 to December 2002, 141 patients who underwent LDLT were retrospectively analyzed. Graft survival rates were 82.5%, 80%, 77.3%, and 77.3% at 6 months, 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years, respectively. The factors influencing graft survival in univariate analysis were graft-to-recipient body weight ratio (GRWR) less than 0.8% (P = .0009), intraoperative transfusion of more than six packed RBC units in addition to the use of cell saver amounts (P = .0001), left lobe grafts in adults causing small-for-size situations (P = .0135), and donor age (P = .0472). The multivariate analysis demonstrated that GRWR less than 0.8% (P = .002) and intraoperative transfusion of more than six packed RBC units (P = .014) were independent factors that decreased graft survival rates. The graft selection of greater than 0.8% of GRWR and reduction of intraoperative RBC transfusion improve graft survival.     

Results of 60 consecutive hepatectomies for pediatric living donor liver transplantation

Several technical improvements have been made to increase donor pool for pediatric liver transplantation, including reduced-size grafts, split-liver, and recently living donors. The objective of the present study is to report our single-center experience with 60 hepatectomies for living donor liver transplantation in pediatric recipients between June 2000 and December 2002. Donor workup consisted of a complete history and physical examination followed by laboratory test and liver function tests. Graft size was estimated using computed tomography scan or abdominal ultrasound. Liver biopsy was performed in all donors. Arteriogram was performed to evaluate hepatic arterial anatomy. All donors survived the procedure. Only seven patients experienced complications (10.2%), most of which were short term. We conclude that liver living donation for pediatric population is a safe procedure.     

Neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation is associated with worse patient and graft survival following pediatric liver transplantation

Long‐term outcomes remain suboptimal following pediatric liver transplantation; only one third of children have normal biochemical liver function without immunosuppressant comorbidities 10 years posttransplant. We examined the association between an index of neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation with graft and patient survival using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. We included children <19 years who underwent liver transplantation between January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2013 (n = 2868). Primary exposure was a neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation index—linked via patient home ZIP code—with a range of 0‐1 (values nearing 1 indicate neighborhoods with greater socioeconomic deprivation). Primary outcome measures were graft failure and death, censored at 10 years posttransplant. We modeled survival using Cox proportional hazards. In univariable analysis, each 0.1 increase in the deprivation index was associated with a 14.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]): 3.8%‐25.8%) increased hazard of graft failure and a 12.5% (95% CI: 2.5%‐23.6%) increased hazard of death. In multivariable analysis adjusted for race, each 0.1 increase in the deprivation index was associated with a 11.5% (95% CI: 1.6%‐23.9%) increased hazard of graft failure and a 9.6% (95% CI: ?0.04% to 20.7%) increased hazard of death. Children from high deprivation neighborhoods have diminished graft and patient survival following liver transplantation. Greater attention to neighborhood context may result in improved outcomes for children following liver transplantation.     

Long term results of living donor kidney transplantation: graft and patient survival

Donor kidney transplantation's graft and patient survivals are better than cadaver donor's. In Spain, living donor kidney transplantation hardly accounts for 1% of transplant activity in comparison to 60% in United States. Accordingly to bibliography, the experience of the Renal Transplant Unit of the Hospital Clinic de Barcelona has demonstrated better graft and receptor survival for living donor recipients. The analysis of 184 living donor kidney transplants and 1678 cadaver donor transplants performed between 1978 and 2002 showed that graft survival was higher in the group of living donors (p < 0.01). At the same time, graft survival was clearly better in receptors of HLA haploidentical grafts (n=142) (p < 0.05). The introduction of new and better immunosuppressive drugs, as well as better diagnostic and therapeutic management of acute rejection, prophylaxis for infections, and control of complications have contributed to better results. The absence of acute rejection between 1978 and 1983 was 45.1%, between 1984 and 1998 was 57.3% and 84.7% between 1999 and 2003. In conclusion, these results demonstrate better graft and patient survival for living donor kidney transplants in comparison with cadaver donor receptors. Altogether with the low risk involved for donors should incentivate authorities, professionals, and patients to promote these therapeutic option by means of adequate information and wider diffusion. Living donor kidney transplantation should contribute together with cadaver kidney transplantation to lessen our long waiting lists, because they are not excluding options.     

One hundred thirty-two consecutive pediatric liver transplants without hospital mortality: lessons learned and outlook for the future

OBJECTIVE: Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) has become an established procedure for the treatment of pediatric patients with end-stage liver disease. Since starting our program in 1989, 422 pediatric OLTs have been performed using all techniques presently available. Analyzing our series, we have concluded that the year of transplantation is the most important prognostic factor in patient and graft survival in a multivariate analysis. METHODS: From April 2001 to December 1, 2003, 18 whole organs (14%), 17 reduced-size organs (13%), 53 split organs (42%; 46 ex situ, 7 in situ), and 44 organs from living donors (33%) were transplanted into 115 patients (62 male and 53 female). One hundred twelve were primary liver transplants, 18 were retransplants, one third and one fourth liver transplants. Of the 132 OLTs, 26 were highly urgent (19.7%). The outcome of these 132 OLTs was retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: Of 132 consecutive pediatric liver transplants, no patients died within the 6 months posttransplantation. Overall, 3 recipients (2%) died during further follow-up, 1 child because of severe pneumonia 13 months after transplantation and the second recipient with unknown cause 7 months postoperatively, both with good functioning grafts after uneventful transplantation. The third had a recurrence of an unknown liver disease 9 months after transplantation. The 3-month and actual graft survival rates are 92% and 86%, respectively. Sixteen children (12%) had to undergo retransplantation, the causes of which were chronic rejection (3.8%), primary nonfunction (3.8%), primary poor function (PPF; 1.5%), and arterial thrombosis (3%). The biliary complication rate was 6%; arterial complications occurred in 8.3%; intestinal perforation was observed in 3%; and in 5%, postoperative bleeding required reoperation. The portal vein complication rate was 2%. CONCLUSIONS: Progress during the past 15 years has enabled us to perform pediatric liver transplantation with near perfect patient survival. Advances in posttransplant care of the recipients, technical refinements, standardization of surgery and monitoring, and adequate choice of the donor organ and transplantation technique enable these results, which mark a turning point at which immediate survival after transplantation will be considered the norm. The long-term treatment of the transplanted patient, with the aim of avoiding late graft loss and achieving optimal quality of life, will become the center of debate.     

Antidonor antibody in patients receiving ABO-identical and HLA-mismatched living donor liver transplants: effect on survival

We retrospectively determined the correlation of results of lymphocyte crossmatch tests by direct complement-dependent cytotoxicity, to the outcomes of 585 consecutive ABO-identical and human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-mismatched living donor liver transplants (LDLTs) (male:female=276:309; median age, 18 years). Crossmatch test results were positive in 14 recipients (2.4%). Patient survival at eight years in the crossmatch-positive group was significantly lower than in the crossmatch-negative group (positive group, 56.3%; negative group, 77.6%; P=0.014). The survival at five years of the crossmatch-positive group was significantly lower than the negative group in both older recipients (>or=18 years of age: positive group, 41.7%; negative group, 76.4%; P=0.0065), and female recipients (positive group, 37.5%; negative group, 81.9%; P=3.3x10). We conclude that antidonor antibodies have adverse effects on the clinical outcome of LDLTs, and that being female and/or older aged (>or=18 years of age) are risk factors for LDLT.     

Long-term survival and causes of late graft loss after adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation

The vast amount of experience with deceased donor liver transplantation allows for the evaluation of the causes underlying late graft loss and the adoption of strategies for its prevention. In contrast, the long-term results or causes of late graft loss after adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation have not been fully examined. Thus, we analyzed 176 adult recipients who survived at least 1 year after living donor liver transplantation. The median follow-up period was 33 months. Of the 176 recipients, eight died and three others underwent retransplantation. The most common cause of graft loss in our series was cholangitis (n = 4), which might be due partly to technical problems. The 3-year and 5-year patient survival rates of the subjects were 95% and 90%, respectively. Long-term survival after living donor liver transplantation was satisfactory in our series. Further improvement of surgical techniques for biliary reconstruction may reduce late graft loss.     

Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score does not predict patient or graft survival in living donor liver transplant recipients

Although living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is a successful procedure for most recipients, outcomes in patients who undergo transplantation as United Network for Organ Sharing status 2A are marginal. There are no published data on living donor liver transplant recipient outcomes relative to Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores. Such information could be useful in living donor liver transplant recipient selection. We retrospectively analyzed all non-fulminant hepatic failure, right hepatic lobe, adult-to-adult living donor liver transplant recipients at our center between August 1997 and March 2002. We calculated MELD scores at the time of LDLT and correlated scores with 1-year patient and graft survival and hospital days during the 90-day post-LDLT period. There were 62 recipients with greater than 6 months of follow-up: 38 men, 24 women; mean age, 47.9 years; 42 white, 1 black, 17 Hispanic, and 2 Asian patients. Twenty-nine patients had hepatitis C virus infection; 4 patients, hepatitis C virus infection and alcoholic liver disease; 4 patients, alcoholic liver disease; 4 patients, cryptogenic cirrhosis; 13 patients, primary sclerosing cholangitis; 5 patients, autoimmune hepatitis; and 3 patients, primary biliary cirrhosis. Mean and median MELD scores were 15.2 and 13, respectively (range, 6 to 40). One-year patient and graft survival were 59 of 62 patients (95%) and 52 of 62 patients (84%), respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between median MELD scores of dead versus living patients (15 v 13; P = .15) or patients who underwent retransplantation versus those who did not (16.5 v 13; P = .30). Mean and median hospital days in the 90-day post-LDLT period were 23.7 and 16.0 days, respectively. Living donor liver transplant recipients with a MELD score of 18 or greater had significantly more hospital days compared with recipients with a MELD score less than 18 (35.2 v 19.8 days; P = .01). In conclusion, MELD scores did not predict post-LDLT patient or graft survival at 1 year. However, higher MELD scores (≥18) were associated with more hospital days during the 3-month post-LDLT period. (Liver Transpl 2003;9:737-740.)     

Donor characteristics associated with liver graft survival

BACKGROUND: Organ availability is affecting the development of liver transplantation in its entirety, leading to transplant teams expanding the criteria for accepting organ donors. In these circumstances, analysis of the impact of the donor's characteristics on graft survival becomes mandatory. METHODS: Fifty-two donor variables from 5,150 liver transplants performed in Spain between 1994 and 2001 were analyzed through a univariate analysis. Those with statistically significant impact on graft survival were entered in a Cox regression model with the recipients' characteristics and other factors linked to the graft technique. RESULTS: Several donor factors negatively affect graft survival: donor age, cause of death, body mass index, vasoactive drug administration, prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) stay, increased alkaline phosphatase and liver enzyme levels, low bicarbonate level, and antecedents of hypertension. However, only four can be mentioned as representing a risk for losing the graft when donor variables are controlled with recipient or technique variables in a Cox regression model: donor age, antecedents of hypertension, prolonged ICU stay, and low bicarbonate level. In the same analysis, norepinephrine administration has a relative risk less than 1. CONCLUSIONS: The multivariate analysis of the impact of 52 donor characteristics on liver graft survival showed the negative effect of an elderly donor, with hypertension combined with the presence of metabolic acidosis, or a prolonged ICU donor stay. The administration of norepinephrine alone during donor management showed a protective effect.     

Long-term outcomes of 600 living donor liver transplants for pediatric patients at a single center.

This report concerns the long-term outcome of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for pediatric patients at a single center. Between June 1990 and December 2003, a total of 600 LDLTs, including 568 primary transplantations and 32 retransplantations, were performed for pediatric patients, who were immunosuppressed with FK506 and low-dose corticosteroids. Patient survival at 1, 5, and 10 years were 84.6%, 82.4%, and 77.2%, respectively, and the corresponding findings for graft survivals were 84.1%, 80.9%, and 74.5%. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that fulminant hepatic failure (FHF), a graft vs. body weight (GBWR) ratio of <0.8, and ABO-incompatible transplants were independently associated with both patient and graft survival. The retransplantation rate was 6%, and 55 patients (9.7%) have been completely weaned off immunosuppressants. Long-term patient and graft survival after pediatric LDLT for a large cohort of children at our hospital were found to be as good as those for cadaveric liver transplantation, although this series includes 13% liver transplantations with ABO-incompatible donors, which are obviously inferior in patient and graft survival. To obtain better outcomes for patients with FHF and for patients with ABO-incompatible transplants, immunosuppressive therapy needs to be improved.     

Factors associated with low graft regeneration in the early phase after living donor liver transplantation

Appropriate graft regeneration after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is crucial to avoid small‐for‐size syndrome. We enrolled 44 recipients who underwent ABO‐identical/compatible LDLT from December 2007 to August 2016 and determined possible factors associated with low graft regeneration after LDLT. Liver regeneration was calculated by the ratio of the graft size on postoperative day (POD) 7 ± 1 day (calculated by CT volumetry) to the size of the donated liver at implant. Postoperative outcomes were compared between the low and high regeneration groups. Median regeneration rate was 1.65‐fold. Regeneration rate was negatively correlated with graft‐to‐recipient weight ratio. Postoperative morbidity rates on POD 14‐90 were significantly higher in the low group compared with the high group (63% vs 18%, P = .03). Graft and patient survival in the low group were significantly worse than the high group (1‐year graft survival 73% vs 100%, P = .002; patient survival 82% vs 100%, P = .01). Cold ischemia time (CIT; per 10 minute; odds ratio [OR] =1.37) and platelet count <60 000/μL on POD 5 (OR = 14.32) were independently associated with low regeneration. In conclusion, longer CIT and postoperative thrombocytopenia were associated with low graft regeneration in the early phase after LDLT, which could consequently lead to poor graft and patient survival.     

精准肝脏外科理念在儿童活体肝移植供肝切取术中的临床价值

目的 探讨精准肝脏外科理念在儿童活体肝移植供肝切取术中的临床价值.方法 回顾性分析2012年12月至2014年1月上海交通大学医学院附属仁济医院收治的58例儿童活体肝移植供者的临床资料.术前对供者行CT等检查,将二维影像学数据进行三维重建,评估供者肝内胆管和血管情况,并对肝左动脉和肝左静脉解剖结构进行分型,测算供者标准肝脏体积、拟切取肝脏体积和受者标准肝脏体积,模拟手术操作,制订手术方案.采取精准肝切除切取供肝.采用门诊和电话方式进行随访,随访时间截至2014年4月.结果 58例儿童活体肝移植供者术前CT血管造影检查示肝左动脉Ⅰ型28例、Ⅱ型10例、Ⅲ型20例、无Ⅳ型供者;肝左静脉Ⅰ型35例、Ⅱ型23例.三维重建预测拟切取肝脏体积为(243±65) mL.58例供者均成功完成供肝切取术,其中7例为左半肝切取,51例为肝左外叶切取.2例供者行胆囊切除.术中实际切取肝脏体积为(255±59) mL,拟切取肝脏体积平均误差率为4.94％.移植物质量与受者体质量比为3.3％±1.0％.手术时间为(260±89)min,术中出血量为(181±35)mL,仅1例供者术中输RBC 2 U.供者术后胃肠功能恢复时间为(2.0±1.1)d,术后拔除引流管时间为(3.0±1.2)d,术后住院时间为(7±3)d,出院时所有供者血清WBC、Hb、ALT、AST、TBil、DBil、AIb等指标水平正常.2例供者术后发生并发症,分别为切口少量渗血和脂肪液化,均经对症治疗后痊愈.58例儿童活体肝移植供者术后均获得随访,中位随访时间为8.7个月.供者恢复良好,随访期间无并发症发生.结论 精准肝脏外科理念应用于儿童活体肝移植供肝切取术,切取准确率高、供者肝功能损害小、术后并发症少、恢复快.     

Correlation of portal venous velocity and portal venous flow with short-term graft regeneration in recipients of living donor liver transplants

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the correlation of postoperative portal venous velocity (PVV) and portal venous flow (PVF) with the degree of short-term graft regeneration in recipients of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between August 2005 and April 2006, we performed 44 adult-to-adult LDLTs with right-lobe grafts, of whom 31 recipients were included in this study. Doppler ultrasonography was used to measure PVV (cm/s) and PVF (mL/min) on postoperative days (POD) 1, 3, and 5 or 6. Portal venous velocity index (PVI) was defined as the ratio of PVV to graft weight (GW), and portal flow volume index (PFI) as the ratio of PVF to GW. Graft regeneration rate (GRR), defined as the ratio of the volume of regenerated graft to GW, was estimated by dividing computed tomography volumetry at POD 7 by GW measured after retrieval of the graft. We analyzed the relationship between GRR and PVV, PVF, PVI, and PFI. RESULTS: GW ranged between 528 g and 1040 g (mean = 735 g) and GRR ranged between 118% and 278% (mean = 172%). Although neither PVV nor PVF correlated with GRR, PVI and PFI at POD 1 (P = .009) and PFI at POD 5 or 6 (P = .012) significantly correlated with GRR at POD 7. CONCLUSION: PVI and PFI at POD 1 are useful indicators to predict short-term graft regeneration in recipients of LDLT.     

Pretransplant Model for End-stage Liver Disease score has no impact on posttransplant survival in living donor liver transplantation

Background

A high Model For End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score ≥ 25 has been reported to be associated with increased posttransplant mortality and morbidity among patients undergoing living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). We reviewed the results of patients undergoing LDLT at our transplant center for decompensated cirrhosis to determine whether a high MELD impacted posttransplant survival.

Methods

From April 2002 to May 2011, 86-176 patients (49%) who underwent LDLT at our center had the indication of decompensated cirrhosis without hepatocellular carcinoma. Data were expressed in mean values ± standard error of the means (range). Patients survival rates were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method.

Results

Among the 86 patients with decompensated cirrhosis: Age was 49 ± 2 (1-68) years and 60 (70%) were of male gender. The causes in 25 (29%) were hepatitis B and 25 (29%) hepatitis C as well as one each for hepatitis B/C and B/D coinfections: 9 (10%), alcoholic cirrhosis. MELD score was 18 ± 1 (range = 6-40). In hospital mortality was 6/86 (7%). At 1152 ± 95 (range = 7-3317) days posttransplant follow-up 64 (74%) were alive with 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates of 84%, 70%, and 70%, respectively. MELD scores did not differ between those who survived and those who died (17.5 ± 8.0 versus 17.8 ± 8.4). No difference was noted in those with MELD < 25 or ≥25. In fact, the recipient with the highest MELD score (40) survived.

Conclusion

A high MELD score had no impact on posttransplant survival among cirrhotic patients undergoing LDLT. It should be considered to be an urgent indication rather than a contraindication to LDLT.     

Donor-recipient age difference and graft survival in living donor kidney transplantation

Background

In paired living kidney exchange donation from an old donor to a young recipient, it may be argued that elderly donors provide an inferior quality kidney. However, the impact of donors older than recipients on transplant outcomes remains unclear.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the charts of primary living kidney transplantation patients who were divided into two groups based on the age difference between donor and recipient (recipient age subtracted from donor age, donor-recipient < 20 vs ≥ 20). The donor-recipient age difference < 20 group comprised 75 and donor-recipient age difference ≥ 20 group, 25 subjects. Outcome measures included serum creatinine, acute rejection episodes as well as graft and patient survivals at 1 and 5 years after transplantation.

Results

The mean donor age difference cohorts of < 20 and ≥ 20 years showed donor ages of 33 ± 8 and 54 ± 8 years, respectively. The mean recipient age in both groups averaged under 40 years. The acute rejection rate within the first year posttransplantation was greater among age difference ≥ 20 years. The mean serum creatinine values of the donor-recipient age difference < 20 group was lower than the ≥20 years group at 1 and 5 years posttransplant. The 1-year difference was associated with an increased creatinine value at 5 years. However, death-censored graft survival of the age difference of the ≥ 20 years group was not different (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.01-1.37, P = .08). Patient survival of the age difference ≥ 20 years group showed no difference compared with the age difference < 20 years group (HR = 0.25, 95% CI = 0.01-6.35, P = .4).

Conclusion

Although the cohort of a donor-young recipient age difference ≥ 20 years showed a greater risk of an acute rejection episode early posttransplantation, it did not affect graft or patient survivals. When considering paired kidney donation, older age donors should not necessarily be limited.