Autoimmune heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia

Summary

Autoimmune heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (aHIT) indicates the presence in patients of anti‐platelet factor 4 (PF4)–polyanion antibodies that are able to activate platelets strongly even in the absence of heparin (heparin‐independent platelet activation). Nevertheless, as seen with serum obtained from patients with otherwise typical heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), serum‐induced platelet activation is inhibited at high heparin concentrations (10–100 IU mL^?1 heparin). Furthermore, upon serial dilution, aHIT serum will usually show heparin‐dependent platelet activation. Clinical syndromes associated with aHIT include: delayed‐onset HIT, persisting HIT, spontaneous HIT syndrome, fondaparinux‐associated HIT, heparin ‘flush’‐induced HIT, and severe HIT (platelet count of < 20 × 10⁹ L^?1) with associated disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). Recent studies have implicated anti‐PF4 antibodies that are able to bridge two PF4 tetramers even in the absence of heparin, probably facilitated by non‐heparin platelet‐associated polyanions (chondroitin sulfate and polyphosphates); nascent PF4–aHIT‐IgG complexes recruit additional heparin‐dependent HIT antibodies, leading to the formation of large multimolecular immune complexes and marked platelet activation. aHIT can persist for several weeks, and serial fibrin, D‐dimer, and fibrinogen levels, rather than the platelet count, may be helpful for monitoring treatment response. Although standard anticoagulant therapy for HIT ought to be effective, published experience indicates frequent failure of activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT)‐adjusted anticoagulants (argatroban, bivalirudin), probably because of underdosing in the setting of HIT‐associated DIC, known as ‘APTT confounding’. Thus, non‐APTT‐adjusted therapies with drugs such as danaparoid and fondaparinux, or even direct oral anticoagulants, such as rivaroxaban or apixaban, are suggested therapies, especially for long‐term management of persisting HIT. In addition, emerging data indicate that high‐dose intravenous immunoglobulin can interrupt HIT antibody‐induced platelet activation, leading to rapid platelet count recovery.

     

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: an autoimmune disorder regulated through dynamic autoantigen assembly/disassembly

Heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is the most common drug‐induced, antibody‐mediated cause of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis. HIT is caused by IgG antibodies that bind to epitopes on platelet factor 4 (PF4) released from activated platelets that develop when it forms complexes with heparin. Anti‐PF4/antibodies develop in over 50% of patients undergoing surgery involving cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), an incidence 20‐fold higher than HIT. Why might this occur? Binding of HIT IgG occurs only over a narrow molar ratio of reactants, being optimal at 1 mol PF4 tetramer to 1 mol unfractionated heparin (UFH). At these ratios, PF4 and UFH form ultralarge (>670 kD) complexes that bind multiple IgG molecules/complex, are highly antigenic, and promote platelet activation. Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), which is less antigenic, forms ultralarge complexes less efficiently and largely at supratherapeutic concentrations. In transgenic mice that vary in expression of human PF4 on their platelets, antigenic complexes form between PF4 and endogenous chondroitin sulfate. Binding of HIT IgG to platelets and induction of thrombocytopenia in vivo is proportional to PF4 expression. Heparin prolongs the duration and exacerbates the severity of the thrombocytopenia. High doses of heparin, as used in CPB, or protamine, which competes with PF4 for heparin, disrupts antigen formation and prevents thrombocytopenia induced by HIT antibody. These studies may help explain the disparity between the incidence of antibody formation and clinical disease and may help identify patients at risk for HIT (high platelet PF4). They also demonstrate that this autoimmune disease can be modulated at the level of autoantigen formation and point to rational means to intervene proximal to thrombin generation. J. Clin. Apheresis. 22:, 2007 © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia – therapeutic concentrations of danaparoid,unlike fondaparinux and direct thrombin inhibitors,inhibit formation of platelet factor 4–heparin complexes

Summary. Background: Treatment of heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), a disorder in which anti‐platelet factor 4 (PF4)–heparin antibodies cause platelet activation and hypercoagulability, requires alternative (non‐heparin) anticoagulation. Treatment options include direct thrombin inhibitors [lepirudin and argatroban (approved), and bivalirudin], danaparoid (approved) (mixture of anticoagulant glycosaminoglycans), or fondaparinux (synthetic heparin‐mimicking pentasaccharide). PF4–heparin complexes form at optimal stoichiometric ratios. Objectives: To compare the effects of these various non‐heparin anticoagulants in disrupting the formation of PF4–heparin complexes, and PF4‐containing immune complexes. Patients/methods: Sera were obtained from patients with serologically confirmed HIT. The effects of the alternative anticoagulants on PF4 and PF4–heparin complex interactions with platelets, as well as HIT antibody binding and platelet activation, were investigated. Results: Danaparoid at very low concentrations increased PF4 binding to platelets. In therapeutic concentrations, however, it decreased PF4 binding to platelets (P = 0.0004), displaced PF4–heparin complexes from platelets (P = 0.0033) and PF4 from the surface of a PF4‐transfected HEK‐293 EBNA cell line expressing the PF4 receptor CXCR3‐B (P = 0.0408), reduced PF4–heparin complex size (P = 0.025), inhibited HIT antibody binding to PF4–heparin complexes (P = 0.001), and prevented platelet activation by HIT antibodies (P = 0.046). Although fondaparinux also interfered with PF4 binding to platelets, HIT antibody binding to PF4–heparin complexes, and activation of platelets by HIT antibodies, these effects occurred only at supratherapeutic concentrations. The direct thrombin inhibitors had no effect at any concentrations. Conclusions: Danaparoid uniquely interferes with the pathogenesis of HIT by disrupting PF4‐containing immune complexes at therapeutic dose concentrations. It is possible that these effects contribute to its therapeutic efficacy.     

Early-onset and persisting thrombocytopenia in post-cardiac surgery patients is rarely due to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, even when antibody tests are positive

See also Gruel Y, Pouplard C. Post‐operative platelet count profile: the most reliable tool for identifying patients with true heparin‐induced thrombocypenia after cardiac surgery. This issue, pp 27–29. Summary. Background: The high frequency of thrombocytopenia in post‐cardiac surgery patients makes it challenging to diagnose heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Two platelet count profiles are reported as indicating possible HIT in these patients: profile 1 describes a platelet count fall that begins between postoperative days 5 and 10, whereas profile 2 denotes early‐onset thrombocytopenia that persists beyond day 5. Objectives: To examine how these platelet count profiles correlate with antibody status and HIT post‐cardiac surgery. Methods: We prospectively screened 581 cardiac surgery patients for heparin‐dependent antibodies by platelet factor 4 (PF4)–heparin immunoassay and platelet‐activation test, and performed daily platelet counts (until day 10) with 30‐day follow‐up. Results: All three patients with platelet count profile 1 tested positive for platelet‐activating anti‐PF4–heparin IgG antibodies [odds ratio (OR) 521.7, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.9–34 000, P = 0.002], and were judged to have HIT. In contrast, none of 25 patients with early‐onset and persisting thrombocytopenia (profile 2) was judged to have HIT, including five patients testing positive for platelet‐activating anti‐PF4–heparin IgG antibodies. In these patients, the frequency of heparin‐dependent antibodies did not differ from that in non‐thrombocytopenic controls, either for anti‐PF4–heparin IgG (OR 1.7, 95% CI 0.7–4.1, P = 0.31) or for platelet‐activating antibodies (OR 1.9, 95% CI 0.6–5.7, P = 0.20). Multivariate analysis revealed that type of cardiac surgery, but not HIT antibody status, predicted early‐onset and persisting thrombocytopenia. Together, these findings show that HIT was uncommon in this study population [overall frequency, 3/581 (0.5%), 95% CI 0.1–1.5%]. Conclusions: Thrombocytopenia that begins between 5 and 10 days post‐cardiac surgery is highly predictive for HIT. In contrast, early‐onset and persisting thrombocytopenia is usually caused by non‐HIT factors with coinciding heparin‐dependent antibody seroconversion.     

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia associated with collection of hematopoietic progenitor cells by apheresis

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) can occur following exposure to heparin and is characterized by thrombocytopenia with increased risk for thrombosis. This condition is mediated by formation of immunoglobulin G antibodies against platelet factor 4/heparin complexes that can subsequently lead to platelet activation. Herein, we detail the clinical and laboratory findings, treatments, and outcomes of two patients who developed HIT and thrombosis after undergoing collection of hematopoietic progenitor cells by apheresis (HPC-A) for autologous HPC transplant. Given that heparin may be used during HPC-A collections, these cases emphasize the importance of prompt consideration of HIT in patients that develop thrombocytopenia and thrombosis following HPC-A collection with heparin anticoagulation.     

肝素／血小板因子4抗体与肝素诱导的血小板减少症

肝素诱导的血小板减少症（heparin—induced thrombocytopenia，HIT）是肝素治疗引起的严重并发症，可导致血栓形成和栓塞。HIT的发病机制主要与肝素／血小板因子4抗体介导的免疫反应有关，IgG类是主要的致病抗体，能与肝素和血小板因子4结合形成复合物，引起血小板凝集和凝血反应增强，同时抗体还通过作用于血管内皮细胞和单核细胞参与HIT的形成。抗体相关的实验室检测包括功能性血小板试验和免疫学试验，临床表现结合实验室检测有助于本病的早期诊断和治疗，但是在检测方面目前尚没有理想的方法。本文就AHPF4抗体、HIT发病机制、临床实验室检测和免疫学试验检测等问题进行了综述。     

Testing for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia antibodies

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) has a distinct clinical profile and unique pathogenesis. It is caused by platelet-activating IgG antibodies that recognize multimolecular complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) bound to heparin or certain other polyanions. Although an immune response to PF4/heparin associated with heparin treatment is very common, clinical HIT occurs only among the minority of patients whose antibodies are capable of strongly activating platelets. This explains why certain platelet activation assays and anti-PF4/polyanion immunoassays have high sensitivity for HIT and why diagnostic specificity is highest for those assays that preferentially detect pathogenic antibodies, such as the washed platelet activation assays or immunoassays that detect only IgG antibodies. Negative results obtained in a solid-phase PF4/polyanion immunoassay generally exclude HIT (high negative predictive value), especially in a setting of a low pretest probability. In addition, because the magnitude of a positive test result correlates with greater likelihood of HIT, a Bayesian diagnostic approach that combines pretest probability and the magnitude of a positive test result is recommended. Recent studies suggest that presence of anti-PF4/polyanion antibodies in certain clinical settings confers an adverse prognosis, even without clinically evident HIT. Whether such antibodies impart "forme fruste" HIT or are simply a surrogate marker for a non-HIT adverse risk factor such as inflammation is unresolved.     

The use of flow cytometry in the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT)

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) affects some of the patients exposed to heparin. It is mediated by antibodies that recognize neoepitopes on platelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin complexes. A HIT diagnosis requires both clinical and laboratory evaluation and remains a challenge. Since many patients develop antibodies in response to heparin, but only a few of them generate anti-PF4/heparin antibodies capable of activating platelets which consequently cause clinical complications, the performance of serologic assays is not enough to diagnose HIT. Functional assays can identify pathogenic antibodies capable of platelet activation, but they are more demanding and their limited availability contributes to the problem of diagnosing HIT. Restricted laboratories usually collect sera of multiple patients to perform functional assays only once or twice a week; hence, a HIT diagnosis can take several days. The use of flow cytometry appears to be a promising alternative in the confirmation of pathogenic anti-PF4/heparin antibodies. Flow cytometric assays detect either activation markers on a healthy donor’s platelet surfaces or platelet derived microparticles formed after platelet incubation with a patient’s serum. Flow cytometers are readily available in many clinical laboratories, so this technology introduces the possibility of an earlier HIT diagnosis. The objective of this review was to collect findings on flow cytometric HIT confirmations to the present date, and to review the currently available flow cytometric assays used in the diagnosis of HIT.     

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

A summary of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is presented. HIT is an adverse drug reaction characterized by thrombocytopenia and a high risk for venous or arterial thrombosis. The frequency of HIT ranges from 1 to 5% of patients receiving heparin with exact frequencies ranging between specific agents. Interestingly, this immune-mediated syndrome is ironically associated with thrombosis, not bleeding, with thrombin formation playing a major role. It is caused by heparin-dependent, platelet-activating antibodies that identifies a self-protein, PF4, bound to heparin that results in an antibody formation. The resulting platelet activation is associated with increased thrombin generation. Typically, the platelet count fall begins 5–10 days after starting heparin, although a rapid platelet count fall can occur in a patient who has antibodies from recent heparin use. Typical causes of HIT as well as the best diagnostic studies and treatment are discussed in this review. HIT was reviewed using a pubmed? search; google scholar? using key words: “Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia”; “heparin”, and “drug AND thrombocytopenia.”     

Prothrombotic factors enhance heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis in vivo in a mouse model

BACKGROUND: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia/thrombosis (HIT/T) is a common cause of life- and limb-threatening thrombosis. The development of antibodies that react with complexes of heparin and platelet factor 4 (PF4) is fundamental to the development of the disease. However, anti-PF4/heparin antibodies are far more common than is HIT/T and there is less understanding of the factors that contribute to thrombosis in only a subset of patients. OBJECTIVES: Both qualitative and quantitative differences in multiple factors (e.g. antibodies, heparin and platelets) may influence the clinical course of patients who develop anti-PF4/heparin antibodies. We examined the hypothesis that host-specific factors, such as comorbid prothrombotic conditions, would exacerbate the pathologic effects of anti-PF4/heparin antibodies. METHODS AND RESULTS: A mouse model transgenic for human Fcgamma RIIa and PF4 and null for mouse PF4 was used to study the influence of prothrombotic conditions on the effects of anti-PF4/heparin antibodies in vivo. To simulate a prothrombotic milieu, mice were fed a hypercholesterolemic diet (HD). HD-fed mice had elevated plasma cholesterol, increased platelet reactivity and increased endothelial activation relative to mice fed a standard diet (SD). Age- and sex-matched mice from each diet group were treated with an anti-PF4/heparin antibody and heparin. HD-fed mice developed more severe thrombocytopenia than similarly treated SD-fed mice. Mice with moderate to severe thrombocytopenia had elevated plasma levels of thrombin-antithrombin complexes, indicative of increased thrombin generation in vivo. Platelet-fibrin thrombi were observed in multiple organs of HD-fed mice that developed severe thrombocytopenia. CONCLUSIONS: Host-specific factors, such as prothrombotic changes in platelet reactivity and/or endothelial activation, may influence the development of thrombosis in a subset of patients who develop anti-PF4/heparin antibodies.     

Prospective evaluation of PF4/heparin immunoassays for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Summary.  Background:  Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an adverse complication of heparin caused by HIT antibodies that recognize platelet factor 4-heparin (PF4/hep) complexes leading to platelet activation. Several methods are available for the identification of HIT antibodies. Objectives:  To evaluate the clinical usefulness of different antigen-binding assays for detection of antibodies against PF4/hep complexes in a prospective study. Patients/methods:  A prospective cohort of 500 surgical and medical patients suspected of having HIT was evaluated. The laboratory assessment included particle gel immunoassay (PaGIA), polyspecific ELISA recognizing IgG, IgM and IgA antibodies (Poly-ELISA), IgG-specific ELISA (IgG-ELISA) and the HIPA test. The pretest probability of HIT was determined using the 4T's model. Positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV) of each immunoassay were determined depending upon the heparin-induced platelet activation (HIPA) results and the clinical scoring. The operating characteristics of each immunoassay were determined using the receiver-operation characteristic (ROC) curve. Results:  Platelet-activating antibodies were identified in 35/500 patients, all of whom had intermediate to high clinical probability. PF4/hep antibodies were detected in 124, 86 and 90 sera using Poly-ELISA (PPV = 28), IgG-ELISA (PPV = 40.6) and PaGIA (PPV = 36.6). NPV was 100% for Poly- and IgG-ELISA, but only 99.5% for PaGIA. ROC analysis revealed that PaGIA is less informative than ELISA. The IgG-ELISA provides better diagnostic information than the other assays. In addition, there is a clear correlation between optical density (OD) value and the probability of having HIT. Conclusions:  Our observation indicates that an IgG-ELISA provides the best diagnostic information of all antigen-binding assays.     

Use of plasma exchange in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: a report of two cases and a review of the literature

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), which is characterized by thrombocytopenia and potentially serious thromboses, may develop in patients exposed to heparin anticoagulation. HIT is caused by antibodies to the heparin/platelet factor 4 (PF4) complex. Management of HIT involves discontinuation of heparin and anticoagulation with a nonheparin alternative such as a direct thrombin inhibitor (DTI). This poses a challenge in the management of patients who need to undergo cardiopulmonary bypass surgery (CPB), because CPB requires anticoagulation with heparin and standardized protocols for use of DTIs are not widely available. We report two patients with HIT who underwent successful CPB with heparin anticoagulation following plasma exchange (PE) to reduce heparin/PF4 antibody titers. Case 1 is a 46-year-old male with cardiac amyloidosis who needed urgent placement of a left ventricular assist device. Case 2 is a 34-year-old woman with acute myocarditis who needed placement of a biventricular assist device. Both patients had positive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay assays for heparin/PF4 antibodies and clinical evidence of HIT before PE. Following PE and subsequent CPB, neither patient had clinical or laboratory evidence of HIT. The literature regarding the use of PE for the treatment of complications of HIT and as prophylaxis before CPB is reviewed.     

肝素诱导的血小板减少症的临床研究

目的 观察应用肝素治疗患者肝素诱导的血小板减少症(HIT)发病情况,探索血小板计数监测HIT的可行性及HIT抗体检测对HIT诊断的意义.方法 对在血管外科应用普通肝素(UFH)治疗的145例患者进行临床观察,于应用UFH治疗前及治疗后进行血小板计数、HIT抗体ELISA检测及肝素诱导的血小板聚集试验(HIPA)等实验室检测.结果 145例患者中血小板减少40例(27.6%),HIT抗体阳性59例(40.7%),HIPA阳性26例(17.9%),诊断HIT 24例(16.5%),其中发生HIT并血栓形成综合征(HITTS)5例(发病率3.4%,占HIT患者的20.8%).多数HIT患者(15例,62.5%)血小板减少与HIT抗体阳性、HIPA阳性同时发生.24例HIT患者的血小板计数均在停用UFH后3～6 d恢复到正常或达到用UFH前水平.结论 通过动态监测血小板计数、联合HIT抗体ELISA法检测及HIPA,可以早期诊断HIT,及时停用UFH,换用抗凝剂,HITTS的发生率有望进一步下降,减少致残、死亡的发生.

Abstract：

Objective To observe the incidence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) in patients received unfractionated heparin ( UFH ) treatment, and explore the feasibility of monitoring HIT by platelet counts, as well as the significance of HIT-antibody test in HIT diagnosis. Methods 145 patients received UFH treatment in Vascular Surgery Department were studied. Before and after the UFH treatment,platelet counts, HIT-antibody ELISA test and heparin-induced platelet aggregation (HIPA) were tested.Results Among the 145 patients, thrombocytopenia occurred in 40 ( 27.6% ) cases, HIT-antibody ELISA test positive in 59(40.7% ) cases, HIPA test positive in 26( 17.9% ) cases. The HIT was diagnosed in 24 (16.5%) cases, and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis (HITTS) occurred in 5( 3.4% in all cases, and 20.8% in HIT patients). In HIT patients, 15 patients (62.5%) were thrombocytopenia, HITantibody positive and HIPA test positive. Platelet counts in all of the 24 patients recovered to normal or level before UFH treatment in 3 -6 days after heparin withdrawal therapy. Conclusion HIT can be early diagnosed by monitoring platelet counts, HIT-antibody ELISA test and HIPA test. Withdrawal of heparin therapy in time and use of alternative anticoagulant, HITTS rate might be expected to decline further.     

False-positive tests for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome and systemic lupus erythematosus

Summary.  Background : Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a severe complication of heparin therapy that can be associated with arterial or venous thrombosis and is caused by antibodies against platelet factor 4 (PF4)–heparin complex. Patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) have been reported with positive tests for PF4–heparin complex antibodies by antigen assay. Whether such patients can be treated with heparin is a dilemma. Objectives : To determine the incidence and nature of the HIT immune reaction in patients with APS and/or systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Methods : Antibodies against PF4–heparin complex were assayed by particle gel immunoassay (PaGIA), or enzyme immunoassay (EIA) with or without an excess of heparin. EIA for PF4 alone was also performed. Functional assays for HIT, that is, heparin-induced platelet activation (HIPA) and heparin-induced platelet aggregation, were also performed. Results : In 32 of 42 patients (76.2%) with APS, APS and SLE, SLE, or SLE with antiphospholipid antibodies, EIA IgG or PaGIA for PF4–heparin complex antibodies were positive. Of these 32 samples, 26 (81.3%) tested positive for anti-PF4 antibodies. All 24 samples that were positive for PF4–heparin complex by EIA IgG were also positive for EIA IgG in the presence of heparin excess, and all were negative by the HIPA and heparin-induced platelet aggregation tests. Conclusion : A large proportion of patients with APS and/or SLE give false-positive HIT antigen test results that are presumably related to autoantibodies against PF4, which can be distinguished from true HIT antibodies by EIA for PF4–heparin complexes tested with heparin excess, and by functional assays.     

Catastrophic heparin-induced thrombocytopenia/thrombosis syndrome related to the use of a Port-A-Cath in a breast cancer patient receiving chemotherapy

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis (HIT/T) syndrome is usually triggered by an immune response after repeated administration of heparin. The syndrome is strongly associated with limb deep vein thrombosis and is potentially life-threatening if unrecognized. We describe the case of a patient with compartment syndrome of the left forearm complicated by HIT/T that developed after Port-A-Cath implantation through the left subclavian vein. Prompt recognition of HIT/T, immediate withdrawal of heparin, and timely institution of thrombolytic therapy successfully prevented limb loss.     

Comparative effects of two synthetic oligosaccharides on platelet activation induced by plasma from HIT patients

Summary.  Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a serious secondary event encountered in the clinical use of heparin. HIT results from the consumption of platelets that are immunologically activated by antibodies directed against complexes formed by platelet factor 4 (PF4) and sulfated polysaccharides that activate platelet aggregation, leading to paradoxical, life-threatening thrombosis. There is strong evidence that the ability of heparin and related compounds to induce HIT is closely linked to the structure of the polysaccharide, and particularly to its negative charge and to the length of the molecule. To test this hypothesis, we synthesized two sulfated oligosaccharides: SanOrg123781, a 16-mer, presenting two terminal charged domains separated by a 7-mer neutral linker, and SR121903, a highly sulfated 17-mer. Both of them displayed strong anti-factor (F) Xa and anti-FIIa activities but their affinities for PF4 were markedly different. SR121903 displaced PF4-bound heparin, whereas SanOrg123781 did not, underlining the importance of the charge of the molecule for the interaction with PF4. Platelet studies, in the presence of HIT serum, showed that SR121903 induced the secretion of platelet-dense granules (measured by the release of serotonin) whereas SanOrg123781 did not, a result in accordance with an absence of affinity of this molecule for PF4. These results were confirmed by measurements of platelet activation by flow cytometry (measured by annexin V binding, CD62 detection and activation of the GpIIb–IIIa complexes). In conclusion, we have demonstrated the importance of the charge of the polysaccharides in the HIT-induced platelet reactions measured by diverse methods, of which some are described for this purpose for the first time.     

Platelet and monocyte antigenic complexes in the pathogenesis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT)

Summary.  Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an iatrogenic disorder that occurs in a small subset of patients receiving heparin. Twenty-five per cent (or higher) of affected patients develop limb or life-threatening thrombosis. The effectiveness of therapy is incomplete and may be complicated by bleeding. HIT is caused by antibodies that recognize the platelet chemokine, Platelet Factor 4 (PF4), complexed to heparin or to cellular glycosaminoglycans (GAGs). However, antibodies with the same apparent specificity are found in many more patients without clinical disease and the reason why so few develop HIT is uncertain. We propose that HIT antibodies recognize cell surface PF4/GAG complexes on intravascular cells, including platelets and monocytes that are dynamic and mutable. Heparin removes cell surface-bound PF4 in most individuals, but removal is incomplete in those with high pre-exposure surface-bound PF4 levels. Such individuals retain critically localized cellular antigenic complexes at the time antibodies develop and are at risk to develop HIT. This article reviews the scientific basis for this model and its clinical implications.     

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Summary.  Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is not only a common but also a potentially serious drug adverse effect. Unlike other drug-induced thrombocytopenias, HIT does not usually cause bleeding, but instead causes thrombosis. Thrombosis in HIT can lead to limb gangrene (requiring leg amputation) or even death. HIT is mediated by an antibody that recognizes an epitope on the platelet factor 4 (PF4)–heparin complex. The antibody–PF4–heparin complex binds to FcγRII receptors on the platelet surface and cross-links the receptors. This induces intense platelet activation and platelet aggregation, and simultaneously activates blood-coagulation pathways. These changes are probably the basis of the thrombotic events in HIT. Diagnosis of HIT should be made mainly on clinical criteria but should be confirmed whenever possible by laboratory tests, particularly in patients with comorbid conditions, in whom the diagnosis of HIT cannot be made with certainty without testing. The tests for HIT antibodies are either immunoassays (e.g. ELISA), or functional tests, (e.g. ¹⁴C-serotonin release assay). Once a clinical diagnosis of HIT is made, heparin should be ceased immediately and treatment with an alternative anticoagulant (such as danaparoid, r-hirudin or argatroban) commenced. This should continue for at least 5 days unless the diagnosis of HIT is subsequently proven to be incorrect. Warfarin should also be commenced when the patient is clinically stable and thrombosis is under control. There should be an overlap of a few days between warfarin and the alternative anticoagulant therapy.     

Optimization of a murine immunization model for study of PF4/heparin antibodies

Summary.  Background:  Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a life-threatening thrombotic illness caused by drug-dependent antibodies recognizing complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and heparin. Little is known about the immune pathogenesis of HIT, in particular factors influencing PF4/heparin antibody formation. To gain insight into the biologic basis of heparin sensitization, we have recently developed an animal model using wild-type (WT) mice in which murine PF4/heparin antibodies (anti-mPF4/H) arise de novo after antigen challenge. Objectives and methods:  This report describes technical refinements to the murine model and describes additional biologic features of the immune response to mPF4/heparin. Results:  Our studies indicate that antibody responses to mPF4/heparin are dependent on murine strain, injection routes and doses of mPF4 and heparin. C57BL/6 mice are more immunologically responsive to mPF4/heparin antigen than BALB/c mice and robust immunization can be achieved with intravenous, but not intraperitoneal, administration of antigen. We also observe a direct relationship between initial concentrations of mPF4 and antibody levels. Additionally, we demonstrate that mPF4/H immune response in mice decays with time, is not associated with thrombocytopenia and displays characteristics of immune recall on re-exposure to antigen. Conclusions:  These studies describe and characterize a murine model for studying the immunologic basis of PF4/heparin sensitization.