Lamotrigine as first-line drug in childhood absence epilepsy: a clinical and neurophysiological study

To investigate to which extent lamotrigine (LTG) may be effective and tolerated as a monotherapy for the treatment of newly diagnosed childhood absence seizures and, secondly, to evaluate the efficacy of this drug on the circadian interictal generalized epileptiform discharges, 20 consecutive newly diagnosed patients (five males, 15 females), aged 3-10 years (mean 6.9 years), affected by childhood absence epilepsy, were administered LTG as first-line drug at the initial dose of 0.5 mg/kg/day for 2 weeks, followed by 1.0 mg/kg/day for an additional 2 weeks. Thereafter, doses have been increased in 1-mg/kg/day increments up to 9-12 mg/kg/day in accordance with the clinical response. Each patient underwent an ambulatory (24 h) EEG monitoring before starting LTG therapy (time 0) and during the maintenance period at the end of LTG titration (time 1). After a mean follow-up period of 10.8 months (range 3-28 months), a 100% seizure control was obtained in 11 children (55.5%), a more than 75% seizure decrease was present in four (20%), and a >50% seizure decrease in five (25%), with a mean LTG dose of 6.2 mg/kg/day (range 1.2-11) in the controlled group. Adverse events were present in three patients (15%); they were generally mild and transient. Our series confirms that LTG monotherapy may control typical childhood absence seizures in about half the children as well as it may decrease interictal generalized spike and wave discharges both in seizure-free and uncontrolled patients. The slow titration phase of the drug due to the risk of the skin rash may eventually reduce compliance.     

Lamictal (Lamotrigine) Monotherapy for Typical Absence Seizures in Children

PURPOSE: To investigate whether lamotrigine (LTG) monotherapy is effective and safe for newly diagnosed typical absence seizures in children and adolescents (aged 3-15 years, n = 45). METHODS: A "responder-enriched" study design was used: open-label dose escalation was followed by placebo-controlled, double-blind testing of LTG. Conventional hyperventilation testing with EEG recording was used to confirm diagnoses and assess treatment success defined as complete freedom from seizures. Ambulatory 24-h EEG recordings provided supporting evidence of effectiveness. Safety was assessed by evaluation of adverse events, vital signs, and physical, neurologic, and laboratory examinations. Plasma samples were taken to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of LTG. RESULTS: During initial open-label dose escalation, 71.4% of patients (intent-to-treat) or 82% (per protocol analysis) became seizure free; individual patients responded at doses ranging from 2 to 15 mg/kg/day (median, 5.0). In the placebo-controlled, double-blind phase of the study, statistically significantly more patients remained seizure free when treated with LTG (62%) than with placebo (21%; p < 0.02; for the intent-to-treat analysis). Mean plasma concentrations of LTG, were linearly related to dose, although there was substantial interindividual variation. No patients were withdrawn from the study for any safety-related reason. CONCLUSIONS: LTG monotherapy is effective for typical absence seizures in children and is generally well tolerated.     

Concomitant use of divalproex sodium and lamotrigine in developmentally disabled patients with epilepsy: a retrospective evaluation of efficacy and tolerability

Objective. Epilepsy in institutionalized severe developmentally disabled patients poses a therapeutic challenge. Frequently these patients have multiple seizure (sz) types that are often intractable. Both divalproex sodium (VPA) and lamotrigine (LTG) have demonstrated efficacy. We sought to examine the efficacy of this specific combination in a group of institutionalized, developmentally disabled patients with epilepsy.Methods. Medical and pharmacy records of all patients with developmental disabilities and intractable seizures were reviewed to identify those who had received VPA and LTG. This retrospective evaluation was structured with respect to time frame and outcome measure. Phase 1 consisted of baseline monotherapy with VPA. Phase 2 consisted of titration/dose escalation. Phase 3 was treatment observation period with the combination of both. Seizure frequency and adverse effect data were obtained from nursing or residential staff records. Primary outcome measures were change in seizure frequency between Phases 1 and 3. Additional measures were percentage of patients seizure-free and those with >75% reduction in seizures. A Wilcoxan signed rank test was used for statistical analysis.Results. Of 293 patients, 25 (12M/13F, 31.7+/-10.2 years) had VPA monotherapy following which LTG was added. Mean doses of VPA and LTG were 1474+/-728 and 165+/-111mg/day, respectively. Baseline seizure frequency ranged from 1 to 25 per month. Mean seizure frequency significantly decreased (6.5+/-vs2.0+/-4.0seizures/month, P<0.001). Sixty-four percent of these patients had >/=75% reduction in seizures 28% became seizure-free.Conclusions. The combination of VPA and LTG appears efficacious in this group of developmentally disabled patients with intractable seizures. Rash, which has been associated with this combination, was notably absent and this may reflect the slower titration schedule used.     

Therapy of Infantile Spasms with Valproate: Results of a Prospective Study

In a prospective study, 22 children with recently manifested infantile spasms (18 patients with symptomatic and 4 with idiopathic infantile spasms) were treated with sodium valproate (VPA). Before VPA was instituted, a loading test was performed to exclude abnormal patterns of VPA metabolites by gas chromatography and mass spectroscopy of serum and urine. This test was repeated during VPA therapy; an abnormal pattern of VPA metabolites was not observed. VPA was started in increasing dosage until infantile spasms were controlled or a maximum dose of 100 mg/kg/day was reached. If VPA did not control seizures or at least reduce frequency significantly after a trial of 4-6 weeks, dexamathasone was added to VPA. If focal seizures occurred in association with localized epileptogenic EEG discharges, carbamazepine (CBZ) was added to VPA. After 4 weeks of VPA monotherapy, infantile spasms were controlled in 11 children. After 3 months of therapy, 16 children were free of seizures (14 patients VPA monotherapy), and 4 children had reduction of seizure frequency to less than 25%. VPA doses varied between 40 and 100 mg/kg/day (mean 74). The mean plasma concentration was 113 micrograms/ml (range 46-177). After 6 months of therapy, total seizure control was achieved in 20 of 22 patients (16 children VPA monotherapy). The mean observation time was 16 1/2 months (range 6-36 months). There were seven relapses in six children during the first 7 months of therapy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Effect of antiepileptic drugs on spontaneous seizures in epileptic rats

The present study investigated whether spontaneously seizing animals are a valid model for evaluating antiepileptic compounds in the treatment of human epilepsy. We examined whether clinically effective antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), including carbamazepine (CBZ), valproic acid (VPA), ethosuximide (ESM), lamotrigine (LTG), or vigabatrin (VGB) suppress spontaneous seizures in a rat model of human temporal lobe epilepsy, in which epilepsy is triggered by status epilepticus induced by electrical stimulation of the amygdala. Eight adult male rats with newly diagnosed epilepsy and focal onset seizures were included in the study. Baseline seizure frequency was determined by continuous video-electroencephalography (EEG) monitoring during a 7 days baseline period. This was followed by a 2-3 days titration period, a 5-7 days treatment period, and a 2-3 days wash-out period. During the 5-7 days treatment period, animals were treated successively with CBZ (120 mg/kg/day), VPA (600 mg/kg/day), ESM (400 mg/kg/day), LTG (20 mg/kg/day), and VGB (250 mg/kg/day). VPA, LTG, and VGB were the most efficient of the compounds investigated, decreasing the mean seizure frequency by 83, 84, and 60%, respectively. In the VPA group, the percentage of rats with a greater than 50% decrease in seizure frequency was 100%, in the LTG group 88%, in the VGB group 83%, in the CBZ group 29%, and in the ESM group 38%. During the 7 day treatment period, 20% of the VPA-treated animals and 14% of the CBZ-treated animals became seizure-free. These findings indicate that rats with focal onset spontaneous seizures respond to the same AEDs as patients with focal onset seizures. Like in humans, the response to AEDs can vary substantially between animals. These observations support the idea that spontaneously seizing animals are a useful tool for testing novel compounds for the treatment of human epilepsy.     

Lamotrigine and Seizure Aggravation in Severe Myoclonic Epilepsy

Summary: Purpose: In severe myoclonic epilepsy of infancy (SME), multiple drug-resistant focal and generalized seizure types occur. Lamotrigine (LTG), found effective in many generalized and partial seizures, has been little used in severe childhood epilepsy syndromes with multiple seizure types. We studied the effects of LTG in SME.
Methods: Twenty-one patients with SME, aged 2–18 years, were treated with LTG, 20 in add-on and one in monotherapy. LTG was started at 0.2–2.5 mg/kg/day and increased to 2.5–12.5 mg/kg/day. For each seizure type, excluding atypical absences, >50% variations compared with the 2 months preceding LTG were considered indicators of response, also taking into account the degree of disability each seizure type produced.
Results: LTG induced worsening in 17 (80%) patients, no change in three, and improvement in one. There was >50% increase in convulsive seizures in eight (40%) of 20 patients. Myoclonic seizures worsened in six (33%) of 18 patients. Of five patients improving in at least one seizure type, four had concomitant worsening of more invalidating seizures. Clear-cut worsening appeared within 3 months in most patients but was insidious in some. LTG was suspended in 19 patients after 15 days-5 years (mean, 14 months) with consequent improvement in 18.
Conclusions: The pronounced seizure deterioration during LTG treatment was not attributable to the natural course of the disease and could be a direct effect of therapeutic LTG doses. LTG treatment seems inappropriate in SME.     

Association between antiepileptic drug dose and long-term response in patients with refractory epilepsy

Seizures in patients with medically refractory epilepsy remain a substantial clinical challenge, not least because of the dearth of evidence-based guidelines as to which antiepileptic drug (AED) regimens are the most effective, and what doses of these drugs to employ. We sought to determine whether there were regions in the dosage range of commonly used AEDs that were associated with superior efficacy in patients with refractory epilepsy. We retrospectively analyzed treatment records from 164 institutionalized, developmentally disabled patients with refractory epilepsy, averaging 17 years of followup per patient. We determined the change in seizure frequency in within-patient comparisons during treatment with the most commonly used combinations of 12 AEDs, and then analyzed the response to treatment by quartile of the dose range for monotherapy with carbamazepine (CBZ), lamotrigine (LTG), valproate (VPA), or phenytoin (PHT), and the combination LTG/VPA. We found that of the 26 most frequently used AED regimens, only LTG/VPA yielded superior efficacy, similar to an earlier study. For the monotherapies, patients who were treated in the lowest quartile of the dose range had significantly better long-term reduction in seizure frequency compared to those treated in the 2nd and 3rd quartiles of the dose range. Patients with paired exposures to CBZ in both the lowest quartile and a higher quartile of dose range experienced an increase in seizure frequency at higher doses, while patients treated with LTG/VPA showed improved response with escalation of LTG dosage. We conclude that in this population of patients with refractory epilepsy, LTG/VPA was the most effective AED combination. The best response to AEDs used in monotherapy was observed at low dosage. This suggests that routine exposure to maximally tolerated AED doses may not be necessary to identify those patients with drug-resistant seizures who will have a beneficial response to therapy. Rather, responders to a given AED regimen may be identified with exposure to low AED doses, with careful evaluation of the response to subsequent titration to identify non-responders or those with exacerbation of seizure frequency at higher doses.     

Foetal malformations and seizure control: 52 months data of the Australian Pregnancy Registry

The Australian Pregnancy Registry, affiliated European Register of Antiepileptic drugs in Pregnancy (EURAP), recruits informed consenting women with epilepsy on treatment with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), those untreated, and women on AEDs for other indications. Enrolment is considered prospective if it has occurred before presence or absence of major foetal malformations (FMs) are known, or retrospective, if they had occurred after the birth of infant or detection of major FM. Telephone Interviews are conducted to ascertain pregnancy outcome and collect data about seizures. To date 630 women have been enrolled, with 565 known pregnancy outcomes. Valproate (VPA) above 1100 mg/day was associated with a significantly higher incidence of FMs than other AEDs (P < 0.05). This was independent of other AED use or potentially confounding factors on multivariate analysis (OR = 7.3, P < 0.0001). Lamotrigine (LTG) monotherapy (n = 65), has so far been free of malformations. Although seizure control was not a primary outcome, we noted that more patients on LTG than on VPA required dose adjustments to control seizures. Data indicate an increased risk of FM in women taking VPA in doses >1100 mg/day compared with other AEDs. The choice of AED for pregnant women with epilepsy requires assessment of balance of risks between teratogenicity and seizure control.     

The Efficacy of Valproate-Lamotrigine Comedication in Refractory Complex Partial Seizures: Evidence for a Pharmacodynamic Interaction

PURPOSE: To assess the comparative therapeutic value of valproate (VPA), lamotrigine (LTG), and their combination in patients with complex partial seizures resistant to other established antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). METHODS: After a 3-month prospective baseline, 20 adults with refractory complex partial seizures not exposed previously to VPA and LTG were scheduled to receive three consecutive add-on treatments with VPA, LTG, or their combination, according to an open, response-conditional, crossover design. Each period consisted of a 6- to 12-week dose optimization followed by 3-month evaluation at stabilized serum drug levels. Only patients not responding to one phase proceeded to the next. RESULTS: A >50% reduction in seizure frequency was observed in three of 20 patients given VPA and in four of 17 patients given LTG. Of the remaining 13 patients, four became seizure free, and an additional four experienced seizure reductions of 62-78% when VPA and LTG were given in combination. Mild tremor was observed in three patients receiving VPA and in all patients taking the VPA--LTG combination. In patients responding to combination therapy, optimized dosages and peak serum levels of both VPA and LTG were lower than those during separate administration. CONCLUSIONS: A considerable proportion of patients who failed to respond to VPA and LTG separately improved when the two drugs were combined, although serum levels of both agents were lower during combination therapy. Despite methodologic limitations in the nonrandomized treatment sequence, these findings suggest that VPA and LTG exhibit a favorable pharmacodynamic interaction in patients with refractory partial epilepsy. The dosage of both drugs, however, may need to be reduced to minimize the risk of intolerable side effects.     

Adding Lamotrigine to Valproate: Incidence of Rash and Other Adverse Effects

PURPOSE: Valproate (VPA) triples the half-life of lamotrigine (LTG), and combined use may be difficult. The adverse effect (AE) profile of this combination needs clarification. METHODS: We prospectively recorded our experience in adding LTG to VPA-containing regimens in 108 patients. Data collected included medications, seizure types and syndromes, and AEs. Patients were followed up to 27 months, until a stable dose was reached, or until LTG was discontinued. Patient management was not altered by this study. There were 60 patients with partial-onset seizures, 30 with generalized onset, and 12 with the Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. In 37, LTG was added to VPA monotherapy, and in 71, to VPA and other drugs. The median starting dose of LTG in our adult patients was 20.8 mg/day. RESULTS: LTG was added successfully in 86 (80%) patients. It was discontinued in 22 (20%): seven because of rash, seven for other AEs, and nine for other reasons. Rash occurred in 14 (13%) but caused discontinuation of LTG in only seven. We found a rash rate of 14.2% and a discontinuation rate because of rash of 8.7% among 310 patients in whom LTG was added to drug regimens not including VPA. Other AEs included fatigue (12%), gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms (9%), dizziness, headache, and insomnia (3% each). Serious AEs were hallucinations (two patients), hepatic enzyme elevations (two patients), irritability (one patient), and low white blood cell count (one patient). Whether LTG was added to VPA monotherapy or polytherapy made no difference in overall AE rate. CONCLUSIONS: LTG can be added to VPA with an acceptable incidence of side effects. LTG-induced rashes are no more common with VPA than with other drugs when LTG is added at very low initial dosages. Rashes are potentially serious and should be evaluated promptly.     

Evaluation of VPA dose and concentration effects on lamotrigine pharmacokinetics: implications for conversion to lamotrigine monotherapy

OBJECTIVE: Lamotrigine (LTG) is approved for monotherapy following withdrawal from enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs. LTG is also frequently used in combination with sodium valproate (VPA), and withdrawal to monotherapy in this setting is also frequently desirable. Given the known pharmacokinetic interaction between these two drugs, clinically relevant questions that should be answered include (1) at what dose and/or concentration of VPA does this interaction begin, and (2) at what dose of VPA does maximal inhibition occur. METHODS: LTG pharmacokinetics was evaluated using single-dose LTG (25 mg) given before and following low-dose VPA co-medication (125, 250, 375, 500 mg per day VPA) in healthy subjects. Serial blood samples were obtained over 120 h post-dose in order to calculate LTG kinetic parameters including area under the concentration-time curve, apparent oral clearance, elimination half-life and percent inhibition of LTG clearance at each dosage level of VPA. Pharmacodynamic modeling was used to calculate EC(50) values for this interaction. RESULTS: LTG pharmacokinetic parameters were evaluated in adult healthy female & male volunteers. Mean trough VPA concentrations at doses of 125, 250, 375 and 500 mg per day were 6.5, 13.9, 16.1 and 31.9 microg/ml, respectively. Maximal theoretical inhibition of LTG oral clearance by VPA is approximately 65%, with an EC50 concentration value of approximately 5.6 microg/ml of VPA. Mean inhibition of LTG oral clearance during concomitant treatment with VPA 125, 250, 375 and 500 mg per day was 30.8, 51.5, 52.8 and 50.3%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that VPA inhibition of LTG clearance begins at very low VPA doses and concentrations. Importantly, maximal inhibition can be expected at VPA doses of approximately 500 mg per day, with the magnitude of inhibition diminishing at doses below this. These data provide useful information to develop a dosing algorithm to facilitate conversion to LTG monotherapy.     

Lamotrigine Therapy in Juvenile Neuronal Ceroid Lipofuscinosis

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of lamotrigine (LTG) therapy on epileptic seizures and general well-being in patients with juvenile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis (JNCL). METHODS: LTG was initiated in 28 patients with JNCL. The mean age of the patients at the initiation of LTG was 13.7 years (range, 6.7-28.2 years). LTG was started at a dosage of 0.1-0.5 mg/kg/day and increased every 2 weeks until a maintenance dose of 1.25-15 mg/kg/day was reached. On the basis of the indication for LTG therapy, the patients could be divided into four groups. In the first group, LTG was initiated on an add-on basis; in the second group, LTG was started as the first antiepileptic drug (AED) because of seizures, and in the third group, despite no preceding seizures, because of epileptiform activity in the whole-night polysomnography; in the fourth group, LTG replaced valproate (VPA), which was discontinued because of adverse side effects. The efficacy was assessed after 1 year on LTG. The mean follow-up time was 2.8 years (range, 1.3-5.8). RESULTS: LTG had a favorable effect in 23 of 28 patients. A decrease in frequency of seizures of > or =50% was observed in 10 and a decrease in severity of seizures in nine of the 22 patients who had preceding seizures. Increases in well-being were found in 18 of 28. During the follow-up, LTG was continued as monotherapy in 13 of 19 patients. CONCLUSIONS: In light of our experiences, LTG seems to be a valuable drug in JNCL.     

Gabapentin versus lamotrigine monotherapy: a double-blind comparison in newly diagnosed epilepsy

PURPOSE: This randomised, double-blind study compared the newer antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) gabapentin (GBP) and lamotrigine (LTG) as monotherapy in newly diagnosed epilepsy. METHODS: Patients with partial seizures with and/or without secondary generalization or primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures were randomized to either GBP or LTG. During 2- and 6-week titration periods, respectively, GBP dosage reached 1,800 mg/day, and LTG, 150 mg/day. In the subsequent 24-week maintenance phase, the dose could be adjusted based on seizure control or adverse events between 1,200 and 3,600 mg/day for GBP and 100 and 300 mg/day for LTG. The primary end point was time to exit, a composite of efficacy and tolerability. Evaluable patients were used for the primary efficacy analysis, whereas tolerability was examined on an intent-to-treat basis. RESULTS: A total of 309 patients was randomized, and 291 (148 GBP, 143 LTG) were included in the evaluable population. Nineteen patients in each group had an exit event. The median time to exit was 69 days for GBP and 48 days for LTG. The hazard ratio was estimated as 1.043 (90% confidence intervals, 0.602-1.809). Overall, 106 (71.6% of the evaluable population) GBP-treated and 96 (67.1%) LTG-treated patients completed the study. Of those, 80 (75.5%) patients taking GBP and 73 (76.0%) taking LTG remained seizure free during the final 12 weeks of treatment. Only 14 (8.9%) GBP-treated patients and 15 (9.9%) LTG-treated patients withdrew because of study drug-related adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: GBP and LTG monotherapy were similarly effective and well tolerated in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy.     

Valproic acid pharmacokinetics in children: III. Very high dosage requirements

Nine children were studied who required very high doses of valproic acid (VPA) (63.6-105 mg/kg/day) in order to achieve VPA serum concentrations between 50-100 micrograms/ml. These nine children had poorly controlled seizures and were receiving other antiepileptic drugs at the time of this study. The children with very high dose requirements were significantly lighter, shorter, and had less body surface area than the control group. Of the pharmacokinetic parameters studied, total and intrinsic clearance, distribution volume, and valproic acid free fraction were significantly increased in the very high dose group. In three patients who were investigated after co-medications were eliminated, clearances and dosage requirements decreased by more than 50%. We concluded that very high VPA dosages are sometimes required to achieve therapeutic serum drug concentrations and that this therapy occasionally improves seizure control. There were no adverse effects of very high dose therapy that required dosage reduction.     

Long-term tolerability, pharmacokinetic and preliminary efficacy study of lamotrigine in patients with resistant partial seizures

Four adult men with resistant partial seizures underwent an intensive open-label protocol designed to evaluate long-term add-on lamotrigine (LTG) therapy. Following an 8-week baseline, LTG was added to their background medication(s) (carbamazepine in three; carbamazepine and phenytoin in one). Incremental LTG doses of 50, 100, 150, and 200 mg every 12 h were given on days 58-60, 61-63, 64-127, and 128-176, respectively. The patients were hospitalized during and after each of the dose increases for a total of 25 days. Frequent outpatient visits were performed biweekly, weekly, or monthly, depending on the phase of the protocol. Frequent clinical, electrocardiographic (ECG), and laboratory evaluations were performed. Serial blood levels and 24-h urine collections were performed sequentially. In patients 1, 2, and 3, LTG was well tolerated at 200 mg b.i.d. Patient 4 did not tolerate 150 mg, b.i.d., but tolerated and maintained complete seizure control on 100 b.i.d. All four patients tolerated LTG and continued to receive it for 39, 46, 105, and 104 weeks, respectively. Serial 12-h plasma LTG levels were obtained on days 63, 70, and 133. On these days, the mean (+/- SD) LTG clearances (dose/AUC) were 0.0436 +/- 0.0171, 0.0468 +/- 0.0093, and 0.0575 +/- 0.0160 L/h/kg, respectively. Some 43-87% of the LTG was recovered in the urine, predominantly as the glucuronide metabolite. In the four patients, the mean weekly seizure frequency per patient was 6.5 in baseline, 5.0 on submaximal LTG doses, and 3.5 on the maximum administered doses. Three of the four patients eventually experienced a greater than 50% decrease in seizure frequency. In conclusion, when given for long periods of time (9.5 months to 2 years), LTG was well tolerated in doses up to 400 mg/day and mean trough levels of 3.0 +/- 0.6 microgram/ml; LTG has a favorable pharmacokinetic profile and appears to exhibit first-order linear kinetics during long-term chronic dosing; LTG shows preliminary evidence of efficacy during long-term administration; and to date, our patients represent the longest reported experience of continuous and closely monitored LTG therapy in the literature.     

Abstracts of the 7th European Congress on Epileptology, Helsinki, Finland, 2-6 July 2006

¹ G. Sills, ¹ L. Stephen, ¹ E. Butler, ¹ P. Parker, ¹ K. Kelly, ¹ E. Wilson, and ¹ M. Brodie ( ¹ Epilepsy Unit, University Division of Cardiovascular & Medical Sciences, Western Infirmary, Glasgow, Scotland ) Purpose: This study was designed to compare monotherapy with sodium valproate (VPA) and lamotrigine (LTG) in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy. Method: A total of 226 untreated patients (116 male) with a recent diagnosis of epilepsy (60 idiopathic generalised epilepsy, 149 localisation‐related epilepsy, 17 unclassified) were randomised to receive either VPA or LTG as monotherapy. Median age was 35 years (range 13–80 years). Patients were followed‐up at six‐weekly intervals and remained in the study until reaching a predetermined end point (12 month seizure‐freedom; intolerable side‐effects including idiosyncratic reaction; lack of efficacy despite adequate dosing). Results: Twenty‐nine patients were excluded from the analysis (24 lost to follow‐up, 3 withdrawn consent, 1 protocol violator, 1 non‐epileptic attack). A total of 197 patients reached an end point, with 126 (63%) becoming seizure‐free for a minimum period of 12 months on initial monotherapy. Of these, 64 took VPA (67% of VPA completers; median dose = 1000 mg, range 600–3000 mg) and 62 took LTG (60% of LTG completers; median dose = 200 mg, range 100–700 mg). Thirty‐eight patients (24 VPA, 14 LTG) experienced intolerable side effects, while a further 33 (18 VPA, 15 LTG) failed to report acceptable efficacy despite adequate dosing. There were no significant changes in mean (±SEM) serum concentrations of testosterone (p = 0.225), SHBG (p = 0.201), or androstenedione (p = 0.394) in either patient group at 6 months after initiation of therapy. Conclusion: These findings suggest that there is little (if any) difference in the efficacy, tolerability, or hormonal effects of VPA or LTG monotherapy in the treatment of newly diagnosed epilepsy.     

Lupus anticoagulant induced by the combination of valproate and lamotrigine

A 5-year-old boy with generalized absence seizures was treated with valproate (VPA), 30 mg/kg/day. One month after VPA introduction, routine examination showed moderate reduction in fibrinogen and prolonged partial thromboplastin time (PTT). The search for lupus anticoagulant (LAC) was negative. After 10 months of VPA treatment, seizures persisted, and lamotrigine (LTG), 2 mg/kg/day, was progressively given with VPA. Seizures disappeared, but PTT was more prolonged than before LTG introduction. The search for LAC was positive, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) for immunoglobulin G (IgG) anticardiolipid antibodies were positive. Serum autoantibody screen and rheumatoid factor were negative; serum complement was normal. LAC eventually disappeared with VPA discontinuation. We believe that LTG may have exacerbated an initially mild immune response induced by VPA without clinical evidence of systemic disease. We therefore suggest that careful surveillance for LAC and systemic disease should be instituted when VPA is used with LTG.     

Lamotrigine Monotherapy in Newly Diagnosed Untreated Epilepsy: A Double-Blind Comparison with Phenytoin

PURPOSE: Lamotrigine is an effective add-on therapy against a range of epileptic seizure types. Comparative studies with carbamazepine (CBZ) as monotherapy in newly diagnosed epilepsy suggest similar efficacy. In this study, lamotrigine (LTG) and phenytoin (PHT) are compared. METHODS: In a double-blind parallel-groups study, 181 patients with newly diagnosed untreated partial seizures or secondarily or primary generalised tonic-clonic seizures were randomised to two treatment groups. One group (n = 86) received LTG titrated over 6 weeks from a starting dose of 100 mg/day. The other (n = 95) received PHT titrated from 200 mg/day. Treatment continued for < or =48 weeks. RESULTS: The percentages of patients remaining on each treatment and seizure free during the last 24 and 40 weeks of the study, and times to first seizure after the first 6 weeks of treatment (dose-titration period), did not differ significantly between the treatment groups. These were measures of efficacy. Time to discontinuation, a composite index of efficacy and safety, likewise did not distinguish between treatments. Adverse events led to discontinuation of 13 (15%) patients from LTG and 18 (19%) from PHT. The adverse-event profile for LTG was dominated by skin rash [discontinuation of 10 (11.6%) patients compared with five (5.3%) from PHT] rather than central nervous system side effects: asthenia, somnolence, and ataxia were each significantly more frequent in the PHT group. The high rate of rash with LTG was probably due to the high starting dose and may be avoidable. A quality-of-life instrument, the SEALS inventory, favoured LTG. Patients taking PHT showed the biochemical changes expected of an enzyme-inducing drug, whereas those taking LTG did not. CONCLUSIONS: LTG and PHT monotherapy were similarly effective against these seizure types in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy. LTG was better tolerated, more frequently causing rash, but with a lower incidence of central nervous system side effects.     

Utility of the Lethargic (lh/lh) Mouse Model of Absence Seizures in Predicting the Effects of Lamotrigine,Vigabatrin, Tiagabine,Gabapentin, and Topiramate Against Human Absence Seizures

Summary: Purpose: Traditional methods of preclinical screening have predicted the effects of a putative antiepi-leptic drug (AED) against human absence seizures by testing its efficacy against clonic seizures in the high-dose pen-tylenetetrazole (PTZ) model. This high-dose PTZ model correctly predicted the efficacy of ethosuximide (ESM), benzodiazepines, and valproate (VPA) and the lack of efficacy of phenytoin (PHT) and carbamazepine (CBZ). However, the high-dose PTZ model erred in predictions for (a) phenobarbital (PB) (PTZ: efficacy; human: noneffi-cacy); (b) lamotrigine (LTG) (PTZ nonefficacy; human: efficacy); (c) vigabatrin (VGB) (PTZ: nonefficacy; human: proabsence effect); and (d) tiagabine (TGB) (PTZ efficacy; human: possibleproabsence). It also appears to have erred in predictions for gabapentin (GBP) (PTZ efficacy) and topiramate (TPM) (PTZ: efficacy). Because the lh/lh genetic model of absence seizures correctly predicted effects of ESM, clonazepam, VPA, PHT, CBZ, and PB against human absence seizures, we performed this study to test the predictive utility of the lWZh model for LTG, VGB, TGB, GBP, and TPM. Methods: Bipolar recording electrodes were implanted bilaterally into frontal neocortex of 8–week-old male lWZh mice. With the exception of VGB, vehicle or drugs were administered intraperitoneally (i.p.) on alternating days, and an EEG was used to record effects on seizure frequency. With VGB, vehicle was administered i.p. on day 1, and gradually increasing doses of VGB were administered on successive days. Drug and vehicle effects were compared in corresponding lfi-min epochs of the 150–min period after administration. Results: LTG (4.8–144 μmol/kg) significantly (p < 0.04) reduced seizure frequency (by 6.5%) compared with vehicle. In contrast, VGB (0.35–11 mmol/kg) and TGB (0.27–27 μmol/kg) significantly increased seizure frequency (300– 700%) and seizure duration (1,700–1,800%; p ≤ 0.001). GBP (18μmol/kg to 1.8 mmol/kg) and TPM (8.9–29.5 pmol/kg) had no significant effect on seizure frequency. Conclusions: In contrast to the high-dose PTZ model, the lh/lh model correctly predicted the antiabsence effect of LTG, the possible proabsence effects of VGB and TGB, and the lack of effect of GBP and TPM. The lWlh model appears to be superior to the high-dose PTZ model in predicting efficacy of putative AEDs against human absence seizures.     

Vigabatrin as add-on therapy in children and adolescents with refractory epilepsy: an open trial

Seventy-seven children and adolescents with drug-resistant epilepsies received vigabatrin as add-on therapy for a median of 18 months (range 4–36 months) at a dose of 50 mg/kg/day divided in two doses; patients with spasms were given a maximum dose of 100 mg/kg/day. In 23 patients (29.9%), seizure frequency decreased by 50–100% and in 12 patients (15.6%) by 25–50%. The number of seizures remained unchanged in 34 patients (44.1%) and increased in seven (9.1%). Vigabatrin was most effective in cryptogenic and symptomatic partial seizures (39% and 43%, respectively), and in infantile spasms (25%). Adverse events occurred in 20 patients (26%), though they were generally mild and transient, suggesting that vigabatrin is well tolerated.