Improving communication between hospitals and care homes: the development of a daily living plan for older people

The present study describes a practice development project that produced a user-led daily living plan (DLP), which was developed in partnership with older people, and staff from health and social care settings. The DLP was designed to facilitate communication of the daily living preferences of older people, ensuring that continuity of care and support could be maintained and that their future care can be planned on an individualised basis when they move from hospital to a care home. In the process of developing and implementing the DLP, more effective person-centred communication between hospitals and care homes was achieved, and some of the hospital staff's ideas about care homes changed.     

高龄老人社区卫生服务需求及影响因素的调查

目的 通过对成都市高龄老人社区卫生服务需求及影响因素进行调查，了解高龄老人的社区卫生服务情况，为今后更好地开展社区卫生服务提供有益的参考资料。方法 采用入户问卷调查方式，就小天竺辖区204位80岁以上高龄老人的一般情况、健康及医疗保健情况和社区卫生服务需求意愿进行调查。结果 被调查高龄老人有46．10％的老人愿意建立社区健康档案；37．30％的老人愿意医务人员上门提供医疗服务；31．90％的老人愿意在生病出院后，在家中继续接受医疗康复服务；49．50％的老人愿意在社区接受健康教育；26．00％的老人选择热线电话健康咨询服务；29．90％的老人愿意在社区定期进行体检；21．60％的老人愿意接受居家护理服务；40．10％的老人愿意在家中接受康复服务；92．20％的老人选择在家中养老；7．80％的老人选择在养老院养老。结论 高龄老人社区卫生服务出现“高需要，低利用”的原因之一是社会经济因素，原因之二是因为对社区卫生服务宣传力度不够。     

The cost effectiveness of a home hazard reduction program to reduce falls among older persons

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of individual components (other than exercise) of multifactorial intervention packages aimed to reduce the incidence of falls in older people is uncertain. There have been no randomised trials of home modifications alone for the prevention of falls. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of just one component of a multifactorial approach to falls prevention, that is, a home hazard reduction program. The study estimates the size and direction of change in resource use within and between the hospital, home and community sectors. METHODS: A randomised trial was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of home modifications for prevention of falls among older people. An occupational therapist (O/T) with experience in aged care assessed homes for environmental hazards and supervised the necessary home modifications. SUBJECTS: The subjects in this study were people aged 65 years and older and most were recruited during a hospital stay. The cost-effectiveness analysis was based on a randomised trial with a total of 530 subjects. RESULTS: The incremental cost per fall prevented was $4,986. A sensitivity analysis was conducted by removing 12 outlier subjects (6 control and 6 intervention). The incremental cost per fall prevented was $1,921 for all subjects and was cost saving for subjects who had fallen in the 12 months prior to randomisation. CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS: A single factor home hazard reduction program is more likely to be most cost-effective amongst older people who have a history of falls.     

Non‐pharmacological interventions to prevent hospital or nursing home admissions among community‐dwelling older people with dementia: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Older people with dementia more frequently experience episodes of hospital care, transferal to nursing home and adverse events when they are in these environments. This study synthesised the available evidence examining non‐pharmacological interventions to prevent hospital or nursing home admissions for community‐dwelling older people with dementia. Seven health science databases of all dates were searched up to 2 December 2019. Randomised controlled trials and comparative studies investigating non‐pharmacological interventions for older people with dementia who lived in the community were included. Meta‐analyses using a random‐effect model of randomised controlled trials were used to assess the effectiveness of interventions using measures taken as close to 12 months into follow‐up as reported. Outcomes were risk and rate of hospital and nursing home admissions. Risk ratio (RR) or rate ratios (RaR) with 95% confidence interval were used to pool results for hospital and nursing home admission outcomes. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to include pooling of results from non‐randomised trails. Twenty studies were included in the review. Community care coordination reduced rate of nursing home admissions [(2 studies, n = 303 people with dementia and 86 patient–caregiver dyads), pooled RaR = 0.66, 95% CI (0.45, 0.97), I² = 0%, p = .45]. Single interventions of psychoeducation and multifactorial interventions comprising of treatment and assessment clinics indicated no effect on hospital or nursing home admissions. The preliminary evidence of community care coordination on reducing the rate of nursing home admissions may be considered with caution when planning for community services or care for older people living with dementia.     

Elderly care. Armchair theatre

The government's plan to free beds in the acute sector by discharging elderly people from hospital into private nursing homes are ill-thought out and a poor response to a complex problem. Older people may come to fear admission to hospital, seeing it as a prelude to being put in a home. Greater investment in community services would be the best hope of appropriate care for many older people. The government should have the need for hospital-based services for older people in the next three years and aim for a corresponding increase in good community services.     

Effects of intensive home visiting programs for older people with poor health status: A systematic review

Background  

Home visiting programs have been developed aimed at improving the health and independent functioning of older people. Also, they intend to reduce hospital and nursing home admission and associated cost. A substantial number of studies have examined the effects of preventive home visiting programs on older people living in the community; the findings have been inconsistent. The objective of this review was to assess the effectiveness of intensive home visiting programs targeting older people with poor health or otherwise with functional impairments.     

HIV/AIDS Prevention in New York City: Identifying Sociocultural Needs of the Community

This article is a call for those who design social work courses to recognize the complexity and richness of aged care social work in health care and to social workers to shake off ageist attitudes and consider working with older people as a positive option in this rapidly expanding area of social work practice. A mixture of practice experience together with findings from the literature, this article explores social work practice with older people in hospital settings. Social work with older people has both therapeutic and practical components. The importance of integrating a therapeutic approach into all aspects of social work practice with this population cannot be overestimated.     

Social work with older people in a hospital setting

This article is a call for those who design social work courses to recognize the complexity and richness of aged care social work in health care and to social workers to shake off ageist attitudes and consider working with older people as a positive option in this rapidly expanding area of social work practice. A mixture of practice experience together with findings from the literature, this article explores social work practice with older people in hospital settings. Social work with older people has both therapeutic and practical components. The importance of integrating a therapeutic approach into all aspects of social work practice with this population cannot be overestimated.     

Delayed discharge. Home truths

The Department of Health wants to turn home improvement agencies into key players in provision of services to older people discharged from hospital. 104 clients have been referred to the project: 55 related to hospital discharge and 49 to admission prevention. Having a single point of contact for a range of home improvement services has made referrals easier.     

Buying time II: an economic evaluation of a joint NHS/Social Services residential rehabilitation unit for older people on discharge from hospital

The study's aim was to investigate the cost-effectiveness of an NHS/Social Services short-term residential rehabilitation unit (a form of intermediate care) for older people on discharge from community hospital compared with 'usual' community services. An economic evaluation was conducted alongside a prospective controlled trial, which explored the effectiveness of a rehabilitation unit in a practice setting. The aim of the unit was to help individuals regain independence. A matched control group went home from hospital with the health/social care services they would ordinarily receive. The research was conducted in two matched geographical areas in Devon: one with a rehabilitation unit, one without. Participants were recruited from January 1999 to October 2000 in 10 community hospitals and their eligibility determined using the unit's strict inclusion/exclusion criteria, including 55 years or older and likely to benefit from a short-term rehabilitation programme: potential to improve, realistic, achievable goals, motivation to participate. Ninety-four people were recruited to the intervention and 112 to the control group. Details were collated of the NHS and Social Services resources participants used over a 12-month follow-up. The cost of the resource use was compared between those who went to the unit and those who went straight home. Overall, costs were very similar between the two groups. Aggregated mean NHS/Social Services costs for the 12 months of follow-up were pound 8542.28 for the intervention group and pound 8510.68 for the control. However, there was a clear 'seesaw' effect between the NHS and Social Services: the cost of the unit option fell more heavily on Social Services (pound 5011.56, whereas pound 3530.72 to the NHS), the community option more so on the NHS (pound 5146.74, whereas pound 3363.94 to Social Services). This suggests that residential rehabilitation for older people is no more cost-effective over a year after discharge from community hospital than usual community services. The variability in cost burden between the NHS and Social Services has implications for 'who pays' and being sure that agencies share both pain and gain.     

芜湖市老年病人出院后长期护理需求分析

目的了解住院治疗后出院的老年人生活质量状况。方法选择芜湖市镜湖区和鸠江区151名出院老年人进行入户问卷调查。结果老年人日常生活活动量表(ADL)和工具性日常生活活动量表(IADL)功能有了较大程度的提高;患心脑血管疾病的老年人年龄越大在ADL和IADL功能方面受损程度越高(P<0.001);出院老年人再访医院率较高;社区长期护理服务某些项目知晓率、利用率不高,老年人需求意愿较高。结论社区长期护理服务体系总体上供给与需求存在较大缺口;多种因素分析表明,社区长期护理已成为城市老年病患者出院后的首选需求;应采取有效措施完善社区长期护理服务体系。     

The last 3 months of life: care, transitions and the place of death of older people

Many older people die in hospitals, whereas research indicates that they would prefer to die at home. Little is known about the factors associated with place of death. The aim of the present study was to investigate the care received by older people in the last 3 months of their life, the transitions in care and the predictors of place of death. In this population-based study, interviews were held with 270 proxy respondents to obtain data on 342 deceased participants (79% response rate) in the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam. In the last 3 months of life, the utilisation of formal care increased. Half of the community-dwelling older people and their families were confronted with transitions to institutional care, in most cases to hospitals. Women relied less often on informal care only, and were more dependent than men on institutional care. For people who only received informal care, the odds of dying in a hospital were 3.68 times the odds for those who received a combination of formal and informal home care. The chance of dying in a hospital was also related to the geographical region. The authors argue that future research is needed into the association that they found in the present study, i.e. that decedents who received both formal and informal care were more likely to die at home. In view of the differences found in geographical region in relation to place of death, further investigation of regional differences in the availability and accessibility of care is indicated.     

The effectiveness of inter‐professional working for older people living in the community: a systematic review

Health and social care policy in the UK advocates inter‐professional working (IPW) to support older people with complex and multiple needs. Whilst there is a growing understanding of what supports IPW, there is a lack of evidence linking IPW to explicit outcomes for older people living in the community. This review aimed to identify the models of IPW that provide the strongest evidence base for practice with community dwelling older people. We searched electronic databases from 1 January 1990–31 March 2008. In December 2010 we updated the findings from relevant systematic reviews identified since 2008. We selected papers describing interventions that involved IPW for community dwelling older people and randomised controlled trials (RCT) reporting user‐relevant outcomes. Included studies were classified by IPW models (Case Management, Collaboration and Integrated Team) and assessed for risk of bias. We conducted a narrative synthesis of the evidence according to the type of care (interventions delivering acute, chronic, palliative and preventive care) identified within each model of IPW. We retrieved 3211 records and included 37 RCTs which were mapped onto the IPW models: Overall, there is weak evidence of effectiveness and cost‐effectiveness for IPW, although well‐integrated and shared care models improved processes of care and have the potential to reduce hospital or nursing/care home use. Study quality varied considerably and high quality evaluations as well as observational studies are needed to identify the key components of effective IPW in relation to user‐defined outcomes. Differences in local contexts raise questions about the applicability of the findings and their implications for practice. We need more information on the outcomes of the process of IPW and evaluations of the effectiveness of different configurations of health and social care professionals for the care of community dwelling older people.     

‘Seamless care? Just a list would have helped!’ Older people and their carer’s experiences of support with medication on discharge home from hospital

Background Many older people use one or more prescribed medicines on a daily basis. Effective medicines management at hospital discharge can support appropriate use of medicines following discharge and help avoid unnecessary hospital re‐admission. Many people, however, feel they receive insufficient information about medicines on discharge from hospital. Objectives To explore older people and their family carers’ experience of hospital discharge in relationship to the organization and management of medicines. Design Qualitative interviews with older people over 75 years old, taking four or more medicines, and their carers, following discharge from hospital in the United Kingdom (UK). Participants completed medication diaries prior to the interview. Setting Interviews took place in the participant’s home. Results Nineteen interviews were conducted involving 12 carers and seven older people. Participants were generally not satisfied with the discharge process, particularly concerning perceived delays in discharge. Inadequate explanations about medicines at discharge were commonly reported and led to omission of medicines, incorrect dosage, anxiety and confusion. Poor communication between the hospital and general practitioners or community pharmacists was also evident. Conclusions Despite significant policy recommendations and research in this area, many problems with the management of medicines during hospital discharge were shown, and a lack of partnership was evident between hospital staff and patients/family carers regarding the use of medicines post‐discharge. Improved medicines management during hospital discharge is required to ensure older people take their medications as prescribed and to protect them from the adverse effects of medicines not being taken correctly.     

Interactions between hospital and nursing home use.

National estimates are provided, for the first time, of the number of hospitalizations in a year for elderly persons who also experience some nursing home use, and patterns for this interaction are described. In 1987, 816,000 persons were transferred from nursing homes to hospitals, constituting 8.5 percent of all Medicare hospital admissions for persons ages 65 and older. Another 347,000 hospital stays involved people admitted from the community and discharged to a nursing home. The reporting of discharge destination on Medicare hospital bill data in 1987 also is analyzed. It was found that these data may have underreported a nursing home as the destination by between 15 and 20 percent. The magnitude of hospitalizations of nursing home residents suggests that programs aimed at improving nursing home care might have an important impact on total days of hospital care, and that it is important to learn more about the optimal use of expensive hospital care.     

Post-Acute Care for Older People Following Injury: A Randomized Controlled Trial

ObjectivesThe study sought to determine whether older people, on discharge from hospital and on referral to a supported discharge team (SDT), will have: (1) reduced length of stay in hospital; (2) reduced risk of hospital readmission; and (3) reduced healthcare costs.Design/InterventionRandomized controlled trial with follow-up at 4 and 12 months of post-acute home-based rehabilitation team (SDT). Programs were delivered by trained healthcare assistants, up to 4 times a day, 7 days a week, under the guidance of registered nurses, allied health, and geriatricians for up to 6 weeks.Participants/SettingA total of 303 older women and 100 older men (mean age 81) in hospital because of injury, were randomized to either SDT (n = 201) or usual care (n = 202). The intervention was operated from Waikato hospital, a regional hospital in New Zealand.MethodsDays spent in hospital in the year following randomization and healthcare costs were collected from hospital datasets, and functional status assessed using the interRAI Contact Assessment was gathered by health professional research associates.ResultsParticipants randomized to the SDT spent less time in hospital in the period immediately prior to discharge (mean 20.9 days) in comparison to usual care (mean 26.6 days) and spent less time in hospital in the 12 months following discharge home. Healthcare costs were lower in the SDT group in the 12 months following randomization.Conclusions/ImplicationsSDT can provide an important role in reducing hospital length of stay and readmissions of older people following an injury. Almost a million older people (65+ years of age) a year in the US are hospitalized as a consequence of falls-related injuries, most often fractured hip. Hospitals are not always the best location to provide care for older people. SDTs can help with the transition from hospital to home, while reducing hospital length-of-stay.     

Assessing the impact of a restorative home care service in New Zealand: a cluster randomised controlled trial

Due to the ageing population, there is an increased demand for home care services. Restorative care is one approach to improving home care services, although there is little evidence to support its use in the community setting. The objective of this trial was to evaluate the impact of a restorative home care service for community-dwelling older people. The study was a cluster randomised controlled trial undertaken at a home care agency in New Zealand. The study period was from December 2005 to May 2007. Older people were interviewed face-to-face at baseline, four and 7 months. A total of 186 older people who received assistance from a home care agency participated in the study, 93 received restorative home care and 93 older people received usual home care. The primary outcome measure was change in health-related quality of life (measured by the Short Form 36 [SF36] Health Survey). Secondary outcomes were the physical, mental, and social well-being of older people (Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living, Timed Up and Go, Mastery scale, Duke Social Support Index). Findings revealed that compared with usual care, the intervention demonstrated a statistically significant benefit in health-related quality of life (SF36) at 7 months for older people (mean difference 3.8, 95% CI -0.0 to 7.7, P = 0.05). There were no changes in other scale measurements for older people in either group over time. There was a statistically significant difference in the number of older people in the intervention group identified for reduced hours or discharge (29%) compared with the control group (0%) (P < 0.001). In conclusion, a restorative home care service may be of benefit to older people, and improves home care service efficacy.     

The community prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in older people living in their own homes: implications for treatment, screening and surveillance in the UK

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) predominantly affects those over 65 years old. There may be a substantial pool of older people with MRSA in the community. We studied the prevalence in one London general practice, screening 258 older people living in their own home. MRSA (E-MRSA 15) was found in two participants (0.78%). Past history of MRSA was the only significant risk factor. The results of this and other studies suggest that national guidelines recommending early discharge for MRSA carriers have not resulted in widespread community acquisition amongst elderly people living in their own home. Community antibiotic policies for skin and soft-tissue infection do not require amendment. Patients with previous MRSA should be isolated and screened on admission especially to high-risk units.     

Developing and utilising a new funding model for home‐care services in New Zealand

Worldwide increases in the numbers of older people alongside an accompanying international policy incentive to support ageing‐in‐place have focussed the importance of home‐care services as an alternative to institutionalisation. Despite this, funding models that facilitate a responsive, flexible approach are lacking. Casemix provides one solution, but the transition from the well‐established hospital system to community has been problematic. This research seeks to develop a Casemix funding solution for home‐care services through meaningful client profile groups and supporting pathways. Unique assessments from 3,135 older people were collected from two health board regions in 2012. Of these, 1,009 arose from older people with non‐complex needs using the interRAI‐Contact Assessment (CA) and 2,126 from the interRAI‐Home‐Care (HC) from older people with complex needs. Home‐care service hours were collected for 3 months following each assessment and the mean weekly hours were calculated. Data were analysed using a decision tree analysis, whereby mean hours of weekly home‐care was the dependent variable with responses from the assessment tools, the independent variables. A total of three main groups were developed from the interRAI‐CA, each one further classified into “stable” or “flexible.” The classification explained 16% of formal home‐care service hour variability. Analysis of the interRAI‐HC generated 33 clusters, organised through eight disability “sub” groups and five “lead” groups. The groupings explained 24% of formal home‐care services hour variance. Adopting a Casemix system within home‐care services can facilitate a more appropriate response to the changing needs of older people.     

Buying Time I: a prospective, controlled trial of a joint health/social care residential rehabilitation unit for older people on discharge from hospital

The study's objective was to determine the effectiveness of a joint NHS/Social Services rehabilitation unit (a form of intermediate care) for older people on discharge from community hospital, compared with 'usual' community services. This was a controlled clinical trial in a practice setting. The intervention was 6 weeks in a rehabilitation unit where individuals worked with care/rehabilitation assistants and occupational therapists to regain independence. Controls went home with the health/social care services they would ordinarily receive. Participants were from two matched geographical areas in Devon: one with a rehabilitation unit, one without. Recruitment was from January 1999 to October 2001 in 10 community hospitals. Study eligibility was assessed using the unit's inclusion/exclusion criteria: 55 years or older and 'likely to benefit from a short-term rehabilitation programme' ('potential to improve', 'realistic and achievable goals' and 'motivation to participate'). Ninety-four people were recruited to the intervention and 112 to the control. The mean (standard deviation) age was 81.8 (8.0) years. The main outcome measure was prevention of institutionalisation assessed by the number of days from baseline interview to admission to residential/nursing care or death ('survival-at-home time'). Secondary outcome measures were time to hospital re-admission over 12 months, quality of life and coping ability. There were no significant differences between the groups on any outcome measure. Adjusted hazard ratio (95% CI) for 'survival-at-home time' was 1.13 (0.70-1.84), and 0.84 (0.53-1.33) for 'time to hospital re-admission'. However, attending the unit was associated with earlier hospital discharge. Median (interquartile range) days in hospital for the intervention graph was 27 (20, 40), and for the control graph was 35 (22, 47) (U = 4234, P = 0.029). These findings suggest a stay in a rehabilitation unit is no more effective than 'usual' care at diverting older people from hospital/long-term care. Alternative service configurations may be as effective, having implications for tailoring services more specifically to individual need and/or user preferences. However, the unit did appear to facilitate earlier discharges from community hospital.