Small rectosigmoid polyps as markers of proximal neoplasms

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the spatial distribution and histotype of small colorectal polyps and to determine the validity of distal-small colorectal polyps as markers of proximal neoplasms. METHODS: In 366 patients who underwent total colonoscopy and removal of all polyps, the presence and features of polyps were recorded. The relationship between proximal neoplasms and distal polyps was investigated in 216 of 366 subjects who had no personal or familial history of colorectal neoplasia. RESULTS: Of 366 patients, 96 were free from polyps. A total of 733 small colorectal neoplasms was removed from the remainder: 79.9 percent neoplastic and 20.1 percent hyperplastic, inflammatory, or hamartomatous. High-grade dysplasia was noted in 2.7 percent of the neoplastic polyps. One adenoma containing invasive carcinoma was observed. In the subset of 216 patients, proximal neoplasms were found in 11.4 percent of those with no distal polyps, 338 percent of those with distal-small colorectal polyps only (P <0.01), and 58.8 percent of those with at least one polyp >5 mm in diameter (P =0.001). The proximal neoplasm percentage was the same in patients with at least one adenomatous-small polyp and those with only hyperplastic-small polyps. CONCLUSIONS: A distal-small colorectal polyp, whether adenomatous or hyperplastic, may be a proximal neoplasm marker. Total colonoscopy is thus justified in all patients with distal polyps, regardless of their size and histotype     

Risk of colorectal adenomas in patients with a family history of colorectal cancer: some implications for screening programmes.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Most colorectal cancers (CRC) arise in colorectal adenomas. A case-control study was conducted to see whether a family history of CRC is associated with a higher prevalence of colorectal adenomas. SUBJECTS: Subjects were drawn from all patients who underwent colonoscopy at the Royal Brisbane Hospital between 1980-1982 and 1985, and included 141 cases with colorectal adenomas diagnosed at colonoscopy and 882 controls who were free of polyps at colonoscopy. METHODS: The prevalence of family history of CRC was compared between patients with adenomas and negative colonoscopy controls. RESULTS: Overall, patients with one first degree relative with CRC were at no greater risk for adenomas at colonoscopy than patients with no family history (odds ratio (OR) = 0.8, 95% confidence intervals (CI) = 0.4, 1.5). Patients with two or more affected first degree relatives had a more than doubled risk for adenomas (OR = 2.3, 95% CI = 0.5, 8.2), and were also more likely to carry moderately or severely dysplastic adenomas (OR = 14.1, 95% CI = 2.0, 62.9). CONCLUSIONS: These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that some families, in addition to those with familial adenomatous polyposis, have an increased susceptibility to develop colorectal adenomas, and that adenomas in such families may have a greater tendency to undergo malignant transformation.     

Management of Portuguese patients with hyperplastic polyposis and screening of at-risk first-degree relatives: a contribution for future guidelines based on a clinical study

BACKGROUND: Hyperplastic polyposis (HP) is a rare condition characterized by the presence of multiple hyperplastic polyps in the colon, which has been associated to an increased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). Guidelines for management of this disease remain, so far, undefined. AIMS: To evaluate, in symptomatic patients with HP, phenotypic characteristics as well as results of a screening program in their at-risk first-degree relatives. PATIENTS Pedigree information and clinical and endoscopic data of 14 patients with HP was studied. Seventeen AND METHODS: at-risk first-degree relatives from six families were also invited to perform screening colonoscopy. RESULTS: Twelve of fourteen (86%) patients had fewer than 100 colorectal polyps. Polyps' sizes ranged from 2 to 25 mm and were uniformly distributed through the whole colon in 43% of the patients. Hyperplastic polyps predominated, but 11/14 (79%) patients also harbored serrated as well as classic adenomatous polyps. CRC was present in 6/14 (43%) of the patients at the time of diagnosis. Familial history of CRC/polyps was positive in 6/12 (50%) of cases. Colonoscopy in at-risk relatives disclosed polyps in 10/17 (59%) of cases with at least one additional patient having criteria for HP. CONCLUSIONS: Although small, this series demonstrates that a high level of suspicion is needed to diagnose the HP syndrome, in which serrated adenomas seem to be the hallmark. Although an elevated percentage of CRC was observed in this series of symptomatic patients with HP, prospective studies in asymptomatic individuals are needed to clearly quantify the risk of CRC in patients with HP. Because familial aggregation of HP was present in 3/12 (25%) of kindreds, screening colonoscopy should be offered to first-degree relatives.     

Colorectal cancer surveillance behaviors among members of typical and attenuated FAP families

OBJECTIVES: Although enhanced colorectal surveillance is recommended for members of familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) families, little is known about individual-level adherence behavior. This study examined factors associated with recent use of colorectal cancer (CRC) surveillance among FAP patients and their at-risk relatives. METHODS: This cross-sectional study conducted a computer-assisted telephone survey among 150 members of 71 extended families with classic (FAP) or attenuated adenomatous polyposis (AFAP). Participants were enrolled in a university-based hereditary CRC registry or were first-degree relatives of enrollees. Both qualitative and quantitative data were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: Surveillance behavior varied by disease status. Fifty-four percent of 71 participants with a personal history of FAP and 42% of 79 at-risk relatives reported recent use of CRC surveillance recommendations. In multiple logistic regression analysis, lack of patient recall of provider recommendation for an endoscopic examination of the colon (OR 4.8, 95% CI 1.8-13.1), lack of health insurance or no reimbursement for CRC surveillance (OR 3.6, 95% CI 1.2-10.5), and/or the belief that their relative risk of CRC is not increased (OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.2-7.1) were independently associated with not having had a recent colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the known benefits of CRC surveillance, a substantial proportion of FAP family members did not have a recent colonoscopy or endoscopy. Interventions targeted at both clinicians and patients are needed to improve surveillance behavior. These data are also important in designing decision support tools to assist clinicians in identifying and managing high-risk patients.     

Effects of sulindac on sporadic colorectal adenomatous polyps.

BACKGROUND: Although sulindac is known to cause regression of colorectal adenomatous polyps in familial adenomatous polyposis, less is known about the effect of sulindac on sporadic adenomas. The precise mechanisms of these effects also remain to be determined. AIMS: Sulindac was given to patients with sporadic colorectal adenomatous polyps to evaluate its effects on them, and histological analysis was performed to elucidate the mechanism of the polyp regression, as well the kind of adenomatous polys that are susceptible to the agent. SUBJECTS: 20 adenomatous polyps in 15 patients were studied. METHODS: Sulindac (300 mg daily) was given for four months, followed by colonoscopy with removal of the residual polyps. Polyp size, degree of atypia, inflammatory cell infiltration in the polyps, and immunostaining for mutant p53 product were evaluated before and after treatment. RESULTS: 13 of the 20 polyps shrank or disappeared. Patient sex, polyp location, size, degree of atypia, or p53 mutation did not affect the response, but polyps in older patients were more sensitive to sulindac. The degree of atypia or inflammatory cell infiltration was not affected by the treatment. A polyp containing a focal cancer was unresponsive. CONCLUSIONS: Sulindac can cause regression of sporadic colorectal adenomatous polyps.     

A systematic review and meta-analysis of familial colorectal cancer risk

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify published studies quantifying familial colorectal cancer (CRC) risks in first-degree relatives of CRC and colorectal adenoma (CRA) cases and, through a meta-analysis, obtain more precise estimates of familial risk according to the nature of the family history and type of neoplasm. METHODS: Twenty-seven case-control and cohort studies were identified, which reported risks of CRC in relatives of CRC cases and nine, which reported the risk of CRC in relatives of CRA cases. Pooled estimates of risk for various categories of family history were obtained by calculating the weighted average of the log relative risk estimates from studies. RESULTS: The pooled estimates of relative risk were as follows: a first-degree relative with CRC 2.25 (95% CI = 2.00-2.53), colon 2.42 (95% CI = 2.20-2.65), and rectal 1.89 (95% CI = 1.62-2.21) cancer; parent with CRC 2.26 (95% CI = 1.87-2.72); sibling with CRC 2.57 (95% CI = 2.19-3.02); more than one relative with CRC 4.25 (95% CI = 3.01-6.08); relative diagnosed with CRC before age 45, 3.87 (95% CI = 2.40-6.22); and a relative with CRA 1.99 (95% CI = 1.55-2.55). CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with a family history of CRC and CRA have a significantly elevated risk of developing CRC compared with those without such a history. Risks are greatest for relatives of patients diagnosed young, those with two or more affected relatives, and relatives of patients with colonic cancers.     

Phenotypic diversity in patients with multiple serrated polyps: a genetics clinic study

Objective

Hyperplastic polyposis is a colonic polyposis condition of unknown aetiology. The purpose of this study was to examine the spectrum of phenotypic variation in patients with multiple serrated polyps as a basis for gene discovery.

Methods

One hundred and twenty-six patients with multiple (≥5) serrated polyps were recruited to the study. Polyp counts were extracted from histology and colonoscopy reports. Ethnicity was self-reported. Family history of cancer data were derived from pedigrees. Ascertainment status was classified as either index case or identified by screening.

Results

The average reported polyp count was 39. Patients with highest polyp numbers were more likely to be male (P? =?0.02). Colorectal cancer (CRC) was identified in 49 of 119 patients (41%) and 28% of these patients had multiple CRC. Young onset patients had higher polyp numbers (P? =?0.03) and were more likely to have their CRC in the distal colon (P? =?0.02). CRC was significantly associated with the presence of adenomas (P? =?0.03). Patients were divided into moderate polyposis (5-79 serrated polyps) and dense polyposis (80 or more) categories. The dense polyposis category was associated with a lack of family history for CRC (P? =?0.034) and male gender (P? =?0.014), independent of ascertainment status and recruitment site.

Conclusion

Multiple serrated polyps were associated with an increased personal risk of CRC. A subset of patients with the highest polyp numbers was more likely to be male and to have no family history of CRC. This result suggests heterogeneous modes of inheritance and has implications for studies investigating the genetic basis of multiple serrated polyps.     

Computed tomographic colonography compared with colonoscopy in patients at increased risk for colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND & AIMS: To date, computed tomographic (CT) colonography has been compared with an imperfect test, colonoscopy, and has been mainly assessed in patients with positive screening test results or symptoms. Therefore, the available data may not apply to screening of patients with a personal or family history of colorectal polyps or cancer (increased risk). We prospectively investigated the ability of CT colonography to identify individuals with large (>or=10 mm) colorectal polyps in consecutive patients at increased risk for colorectal cancer. METHODS: A total of 249 consecutive patients at increased risk for colorectal cancer underwent CT colonography before colonoscopy. Two reviewers interpreted CT colonography examinations independently. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were determined after meticulous matching of CT colonography with colonoscopy. Unexplained large false-positive findings were verified with a second-look colonoscopy. RESULTS: In total, 31 patients (12%) had 48 large polyps at colonoscopy. This included 8 patients with 8 large polyps that were overlooked initially and detected at the second-look colonoscopy. In 6 of 8 patients, the missed polyp was the only large lesion. With CT colonography, 84% of patients (26/31) with large polyp(s) were identified, paired for a specificity of 92% (200-201/218). Positive and negative predictive values were 59%-60% (26/43-44) and 98% (200-201/205-206), respectively. CT colonography detected 75%-77% (36-37/48) of large polyps, with 9 of the missed lesions being flat. CONCLUSIONS: CT colonography and colonoscopy have a similar ability to identify individuals with large polyps in patients at increased risk for colorectal cancer. The large proportion of missed flat lesions warrants further study.     

First-degree relatives of patients with advanced colorectal adenomas have an increased prevalence of colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The risk of colorectal cancer in relatives of patients with adenomatous colonic polyps is not well defined. This study assessed whether finding colonic neoplasia during screening colonoscopy was related to the family history of colorectal cancer among the participants' parents and siblings. METHODS: Self-reported family history of colorectal cancer was recorded for all participants in a screening colonoscopy study. The size and location of all polyps were recorded before their removal and histologic examination. Participants were grouped according to the most advanced lesion detected. RESULTS: Three thousand one hundred twenty-one patients underwent complete colonoscopic examination. Subjects with adenomas were more likely to have a family history of colorectal cancer than were subjects without polyps (odds ratio [OR], 1.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09-1.70). The finding of a small (<1 cm) tubular adenoma as the most advanced lesion was associated with only a modest increase in the OR of colorectal cancer in family members (OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.99-1.61), but the presence of an advanced adenoma was associated with a higher OR (OR, 1.62;5% CI, 1.16-2.26). Younger age of adenoma diagnosis was not related to a higher prevalence of a family history of colorectal cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Relatives patients with advanced colorectal adenomas have an increased risk of colorectal cancer. Individuals with advanced colorectal adenomas should be counseled about the increased risk of colorectal cancer among their relatives.     

Is colonoscopic screening appropriate in asymptomatic patients with family history of colon cancer?

Colonoscopy has been advocated by some investigators as the most appropriate means of screening asymptomatic patients with a positive family history of colorectal cancer. However, results of such screening have been widely disparate. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the yield of colonoscopy in a cohort of completely asymptomatic individuals with one or two first-degree relatives with a history of colorectal cancer and to compare this yield with that of colonoscopy in a group of patients with apparent anal bleeding. Patients with possible genetic disorders, such as familial polyposis, were excluded. A total of 160 asymptomatic patients and a comparison group of 137 patients with nonacute anorectal bleeding underwent colonoscopy. Colonoscopy was completed in 143 of the 160 study patients (89 percent) and in all of the comparison patients and did not result in any complications. Twenty-two adenomas were found in 17 study patients (10.6 percent); 16 of the 22 adenomas were less than 1 cm in size. In the comparison group, eight adenomas were identified (5.8 percent of patients). No cancers were identified. The difference in polyp frequency between groups was not significant. The relatively low yield of colorectal neoplasms discovered at colonoscopy in this study may in part be due to the small sample size or to the strict criteria used to define these asymptomatic patients but does not lend strong support to the notion that colonoscopy is an appropriate first step in screening the asymptomatic patient with one or two first-degree relatives with colon cancer.     

Clustering of colorectal cancer in families of probands under 40 years of age

Although sporadic colorectal cancer (CRC) is relatively uncommon in the young, it may constitute an elevated genetic risk for CRC in these individuals. PURPOSE: This study was designed to determine extent of colorectal cancer in families of probands under 40 years of age. METHODS: Medical records of all consecutive patients, 40 years of age or younger at the time of CRC surgery, during the time period 1986 to 1994 were examined. Cases of familial adenomatous polyposis and ulcerative colitis were excluded.Via interviews of surviving probands or nearest relatives, dates of birth and death, causes of death, and diagnosis of cancer were recorded on all first-degree relatives (parents, siblings, and offspring), second-degree relatives (grandparents, aunts, and uncles), and any other relatives. RESULTS: A total of 128 patients, 40 years of age or less at time of CRC resection, were identified. Of these, 45 probands/families were reached by phone, and 45 detailed family histories were obtained. Age range of these 45 probands was 19 to 40 (mean, 33.1) years. In 25 families there was no history of CRC in first-degree, second-degree, or third-degree relatives. Eight of 45 probands (17.8 percent) had at least one first-degree relative with CRC, and three of these eight families fulfilled the Amsterdam criteria for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC). In all three families, inheritance of CRC appeared to segregate with the maternal side of the family. In addition, 5 of 43 non-HNPCC probands had at least one first-degree, second-degree, or third-degree relative less than 40 years of age, at time of CRC diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Ascertainment of a detailed family history in early age of onset CRC patients identifies frequent familial clustering of CRC and HNPCC in 17.8 percent of cases.Dr. Guillem is recipient of a Career Development Award from the American Cancer Society and a research grant from The New York District Council of Carpenters Benefits Fund.Poster presentation at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, May 7 to 12, 1995.     

Colorectal cancer risk in first-degree relatives of patients with colorectal adenomatous polyp

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To evaluate any risk of colorectal cancer in first-degree relatives of patients with colorectal adenomatous polyp. METHODOLOGY: In a screening program-based cross-sectional study, 44821 subjects received an immunochemical fecal occult blood test using a 2-consecutive-day method. They were divided into two groups, according to the results of a self-completed questionnaire on family history of colorectal adenomatous polyps, and the positivity rate of an immunochemical fecal occult blood test as well as the positive predictive value for colorectal cancer were determined in these two groups. RESULTS: The fecal occult blood test was positive in 8.5% of subjects with family history and in 4.8% of subjects without family history, and the positive predictive value for colorectal cancer was 6.8% and 2.4% in subjects with and without family history of colorectal adenomatous polyps, respectively, indicating a significant difference in the positivity rate of the fecal occult blood test (P < 0.01) as well as the positive predictive value for colorectal cancer (P < 0.05) between these two groups. CONCLUSIONS: These results show that first-degree relatives of patients with colorectal adenomatous polyp have an increased risk for colorectal cancer, and that the subjects with family history of colorectal adenomatous polyps as well as cancers should be considered as a priority group for prevention of colorectal cancer.     

Attenuated adenomatous polyposis coli

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to show that the diagnosis of attenuated adenomatous polyposis coli must be made with caution and certainly only after adequate colonic examination with dye-spray. METHODS: Four patients thought to have attenuated adenomatous polyposis coli on the basis of family history and the identification of fewer than 100 polyps on simple colonoscopy underwent colonoscopy with dye-spray. RESULTS: All four individuals were found to have more than 100 polyps when dye-spray was used, confirming a diagnosis of classical familial adenomatous polyposis. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnosis of familial adenomatous polyposis may be missed altogether or incorrectly assigned as attenuated adenomatous polyposis coli if dye-spray is not used at colonoscopy. Patients with a family history of familial adenomatous polyposis or colorectal cancer should be considered for dye-spray before the diagnosis of familial adenomatous polyposis is excluded or one of attenuated adenomatous polyposis coli is made.Marina Wallace, Susan Clark, and Ian Frayling were supported by the Imperial Cancer Research Fund.Presented at the Eighth Biennial meeting of the Leeds Castle Polyposis Group, Lorne, Australia, March 1 to 6, 1999.     

Colonoscopic screening examination of relatives of patients with colorectal cancer. II. Relations between tumour characteristics and the presence of polyps.

Colonoscopy was offered to 206 first-degree relatives of 181 patients operated on for colorectal cancer (CRC). Findings of polyps in relatives correlated with Dukes staging, extent of dedifferentiation and localization of tumour in the operated patient, and type of family relationship. Adenomas in relatives and Dukes staging of carcinoma in the patients were inversely related. Relatives of patients with Dukes stage A tumour had more than twice as many adenomas as and a higher prevalence of multiple adenomas than relatives of patients with advanced cancer at the time of operation. If the patient had polyp(s) in addition to tumour, the number of adenomas per relative was almost doubled. Hyperplastic polyps in relatives were associated with poorly differentiated carcinoma in their related patients. These results support the theory that not all CRC are derived from polyps and that adenoma-derived CRC may have a better prognosis than 'de novo' CRC. An adenoma prevalence risk table is also presented.     

Family history and colorectal cancer screening: a survey of physician knowledge and practice patterns

OBJECTIVES: Risk stratification is essential to effective implementation of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening strategies. The objectives of this study were to assess and compare the current knowledge and practice patterns of gastroenterologists and primary care physicians regarding familial risk of CRC. METHODS: We conducted a survey of regional gastroenterologists and a sample of university- and community-based primary care physicians. The survey instrument assessed physician knowledge of screening recommendations and current practices for individuals with family histories of CRC, adenomatous polyps (APs), familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), and hereditary nonpolyposis cancer (HNPCC). The instrument also elicited data about familial risk assessment, documentation, and notification of at-risk family members. RESULTS: Thirty-five gastroenterologists (65%) and 58 primary care physicians (92%) completed the survey. Most gastroenterologists and primary care physicians (85% vs 72%) chose age 40 as the appropriate age to begin screening for a family history of CRC, but relatively few (37% vs 36%) recommended screening at age 40 for a family history of APs. Gastroenterologists were significantly more likely to recommend screening for FAP at puberty (80% vs 27%, p < 0.001) and for HNPCC at age 25 (73% vs 50%, p = 0.04). Colonoscopy was the preferred screening strategy by both groups for family histories of CRC (97%), HNPCC (97%), and APs (77%); primary care physicians also preferred colonoscopy for family histories of CRC (72%) and HNPCC (76%) but flexible sigmoidoscopy plus fecal occult blood testing for a family history of APs (38%). Gastroenterologists were more likely to recommend genetic testing for persons at risk of FAP (91% vs 71%, p = 0.03) and HNPCC (72% vs 57%, p = 0.18), routinely inquire about a family history of CRC or APs (93% vs 63%, p < 0.001), and recommend notification of at-risk first-degree relatives with family histories of CRC (94% vs 55%, p < 0.001) or AP (53% v.s 6%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Although gastroenterologists are more likely than primary care physicians to elicit a family history of colorectal neoplasia and implement appropriate screening strategies, overall compliance with recommended guidelines and notification of at-risk relatives are suboptimal. Novel approaches for improving awareness of the available screening guidelines are needed.     

Establishment of a colonic polyp registry in Rhode Island

A colonic adenomatous polyp registry (PR) has been organized at the Roger Williams Medical Center whose main functions are to prevent the occurrence of colorectal cancer (CRC) in the enrollees, to provide a population of subjects for epidemiological and interventional studies, and to provide educational, including dietary, information to subjects and physicians. One hundred fou and 202 patients with polyps, originally retrieved from the hospital pathology files, were enrolled in the 1984 and 1987 cohorts, respectively, of whom about 90% were followed for at least three years after polypectomy. Three carcinomas, all Dukes A, were found in the right colonin the follow-up period. New polyps identified in the first three years after polypectomy were generally small tubular adenomas with a greater predilection for the right colon than was found for the index polyps. Risk factors for new polyps included history of previous polyps and, probably, multiple index polyps. The use of colonoscopy for postopolypectomy surveillance increased between 1984 and 1987. About 25% of the subjects in, each cohort were either lost to follow-up or received no endoscopic suveillance. On the other hand, some of those who were followed were probably subjected to excessive numbers of procedures. Defects in the PR include inadequacy of personal and family history data, and steady loss of patients during the three to six years after polypectomy. Despite the small size and limited resources of our hospital, its colonic polyp registry has already provided information that may help in the management of patients with this premalignant condition. The more widespread use of securely funded polyp registries would probably reduce the incidence of metachronous CRC in that population and would have significant epidemiological and educational functions.     

Depressed-type (O-Ⅱc) colorectal neoplasm in patients with family history of first-degree relatives with colorectal cancer: A cross-sectional study

AIM: To investigate the correlation of depressed-type (0-Ⅱc) colorectal neoplasm and family history of firstdegree relatives (FDR) with colorectal cancer (CRC).METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted from June 2000 to October 2002 at National Cancer Center Hospital East. Eligible patients undergoing initial total colonoscopy were surveyed regarding family history of CRC among FDR by a questionnaire prior to colonoscopic examinations. All endoscopic findings during colonoscopy were recorded and the macroscopic classification of the early stage neoplasm/cancer was classified into two types (0-Ⅱc vs non 0-Ⅱc). Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated by univariate and multivariate logistic regression to estimate the association between macroscopic features and clinicopathological data including gender, age, and family history of FDR with CRC.RESULTS: The OR of an association between family history of FDR with CRC and overall early stage neoplasm adjusted by gender and age was 1.85 (95% CI: 1.31-2.61, P = 0.0004), that for non 0-Ⅱc neoplasm was 1.71 (95% CI: 1.22-2.41, P = 0.0017) and for 0-Ⅱc colorectal neoplasm was 2.78 (95% CI: 1.49-5.16, P = 0.0031).CONCLUSION: Our study shows a significant association between a family history of FDR with CRC and 0-Ⅱc colorectal neoplasm. When patients with a family history of FDR with CRC undergo colonoscopy,colonoscopists should check carefully for not only polypoid, but also depressed-type (0-Ⅱc) lesions.     

Depressed-type （0-IIc） colorectal neoplasm in patients with family history of first-degree relatives with colorectal cancer： A cross-sectional study

AIM: To investigate the correlation of depressed-type (0-IIc) colorectal neoplasm and family history of first-degree relatives (FDR) with colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted from June 2000 to October 2002 at National Cancer Center Hospital East. Eligible patients undergoing initial total colonoscopy were surveyed regarding family history of CRC among FDR by a questionnaire prior to colonoscopic examinations. All endoscopic findings during colonoscopy were recorded and the macroscopic classification of the early stage neoplasm/cancer was classified into two types (0-IIc vs non 0-IIc). Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated by univariate and multivariate logistic regression to estimate the association between macroscopic features and clinicopathological data including gender, age, and family history of FDR with CRC. RESULTS: The OR of an association between family history of FDR with CRC and overall early stage neoplasm adjusted by gender and age was 1.85 (95% CI: 1.31-2.61, P = 0.0004), that for non 0-IIc neoplasm was 1.71 (95% CI: 1.22-2.41, P = 0.0017) and for 0-IIc colorectal neoplasm was 2.78 (95% CI: 1.49-5.16, P = 0.0031). CONCLUSION: Our study shows a significant association between a family history of FDR with CRC and 0-IIc colorectal neoplasm. When patients with a family history of FDR with CRC undergo colonoscopy, colonoscopists should check carefully for not only polypoid, but also depressed-type (0-IIc) lesions.     

Management of the Difficult Colon Polyp Referred for Resection: Resect or Rescope?

Purpose Patients are frequently referred for resection of difficult colon polyps. Before colectomy the experienced surgeon has the option of repeating the colonoscopy to assess the polyp, tattoo the site, and potentially remove the polyp. The purpose of this study was to review our results with this approach. Methods All new patients referred during a five-year period to an 11-physician colon and rectal surgical group with the diagnosis of colon polyp (CPT 211.3) that was not previously removed were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with rectal polyps, inflammatory bowel disease, previous cancer, or familial adenomatous polyposis were excluded. Patient demographics, details of the polyps, success of polypectomy, reasons for surgical resection, pathology, and complications were analyzed. Results The study population consisted of 252 patients with a mean age of 65 years. Eighty patients underwent resection upon referral without a repeat colonoscopy. Upon resection, invasive cancers were found in 13 cases. A total of 172 patients underwent at least one repeat colonoscopy by the colorectal surgeon. Of this group, 101 patients had successful polypectomy, thus avoiding major colectomy. The remaining 71 patients had a subsequent colon resection after at least one repeat colonoscopy. In 26 cases the polyp site was tattooed for later localization. There were nine postpolypectomy hemorrhages treated nonoperatively and two perforations. Conclusions Repeat colonoscopy by an experienced surgeon leads to complete removal and avoidance of major colectomy in 58 percent of these cases. Patients with large difficult polyps referred for resection should be considered for repeat colonoscopy before surgery. Read at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, St. Louis, Missouri, June 2 to 6, 2007. Reprints are not available.     

Failure to diagnose hereditary colorectal cancer and its medicolegal implications

PURPOSE: We describe a patient who had precancerous colonic symptoms and a positive family history of multiple occurrences of early-onset colorectal cancer in her first-degree and second-degree relatives consistent with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer diagnosis had not been made before her diagnosis of carcinoma of the cecum with liver metastasis. She died at age 20, leading to litigation. Controversies about standards of care, their malpractice implications, and pertinent legal issues are discussed. METHODS: Review of the medical and family history was made by the expert witness (HTL) with appropriate documentation of the chronology of symptoms, as derived from depositions. These documents revealed that the patient's mother had repeatedly discussed with the caregivers her concern about the family history of colon cancer and the need for appropriate surveillance. RESULTS: The patient's colonic symptoms progressed for a period of three years. Flexible sigmoidoscopy was performed by a nonphysician. The physician who ordered the procedure considered this appropriate because isolated polyps were reported in the patient's father and paternal uncle, which apparently led him to believe that the diagnosis was familial adenomatous polyposis. During litigation procedures, a pedigree was constructed and found to be consistent with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. The case was settled in favor of the plaintiff before trial. CONCLUSION: It is essential to understand the natural history of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer, inclusive of the need for surveillance colonoscopy in patients at increased risk by virtue of their position in their family pedigree.