Do maternal psychotic symptoms predict offspring's psychotic disorder? Findings from the Helsinki High-Risk Study

The Helsinki High-Risk (HR) Study is a follow-up study of 179 offspring born to mothers with DSM-IV-TR diagnoses of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, other schizophrenia spectrum disorders, and affective psychoses. Mothers comprised all female patients born between 1916 and 1948 who had been treated with hospital diagnoses of schizophrenia, schizophreniform, or schizoaffective psychoses in any mental hospital in the city of Helsinki up to 1974, and who had given birth in Helsinki between 1960 and 1964. In this report we conducted a principal factor analysis of maternal symptoms using 12 items of the Major Symptoms of Schizophrenia Scale (MSSS), the global ratings of anhedonia-asociality and avolition-apathy from the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS), and the global rating of bizarre behavior from the Scale for the Assessment of Positive symptoms (SAPS), and examined whether the factor scores predicted the offspring's morbidity from psychotic disorders. We found a four-factor solution (negative, positive, catatonic, and affective symptom factors). High maternal positive symptom factor score significantly predicted decreased morbidity from schizophrenia among offspring (P=0.0098). Our result suggests that maternal positive symptoms are less harmful to the child than other maternal psychotic symptoms, and supports the view that positive symptoms are non-specific symptoms of psychosis rather than core features of schizophrenia.     

Diagnostic stability over 3 years in a total group of first-episode psychosis patients

First-episode psychosis (FEP) patients are often given diagnoses that later have to be changed. The aim of this study was to measure the diagnostic stability in a total group of FEP patients; 146 FEP patients were followed longitudinally and prospectively. Their revised baseline diagnoses were compared with their 3-year follow-up diagnoses. The schizophrenic spectrum disorders showed a high diagnostic stability as a group, but there was a great flow of patients between the different schizophrenic spectrum diagnoses. Also schizophrenia was a stable diagnosis. The affective psychosis group was homogenous without interaction of other psychosis groups. The other psychosis diagnoses, both regarded as a group and individually, turned out to be quite heterogeneous, with low stability values and a split course, often ending up in the schizophrenic spectrum. Fifty one per cent did not fulfil the criteria for DSM-IV axis 1 psychosis diagnosis at follow-up. In conclusion, our findings suggest that in the early phase of psychosis. Only three different diagnostic categories would be sufficient; "schizophrenic spectrum type", "affective psychosis," and for the rest "psychotic disorder NOS."     

Diagnostic stability 18 months after treatment initiation for first-episode psychosis

OBJECTIVES: (1) Assessment of diagnostic stability of psychotic disorders or psychotic mood disorders from 6 weeks to 18 months after initiation of treatment in a representative first-episode psychosis (FEP) sample. (2) Comparison between those patients who shifted from DSM-IV schizophreniform disorder to schizophrenia or schizo-affective disorder and those whose diagnosis of schizophreniform disorder remained stable. METHOD: The Early Psychosis Prevention and Intervention Centre (EPPIC) in Australia admitted 786 FEP patients from January 1998 to December 2000. Data were collected from patients' medical records (MRs) using a standardized questionnaire. Seven hundred four MRs were available, 36 of which were excluded owing to nonpsychotic diagnoses or a psychotic disorder due to a general medical condition. Of the remaining 668 patients, 176 (26.3%) were lost to follow-up. Four hundred ninety-two subjects were analyzed. Strategies to assure validity and reliability of diagnoses were applied. RESULTS: The same diagnosis was made at baseline (< or = 6 weeks after admission into EPPIC) and 18 months for 69.9% of the patients. Among the most consistent diagnoses were schizophrenia (97.3%), schizoaffective disorder (94.1%), and bipolar disorder (83.2%); the least stable, as expected, was schizophreniform disorder (40.0%). In subjects with schizophreniform disorder at baseline, the best predictors of a shift from schizophreniform disorder to schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder were a higher baseline Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness scale score and lower premorbid Global Assessment of Functioning score, although the variance accounted for was small (R2 = .07). CONCLUSIONS: A longitudinally based diagnostic process in FEP samples is needed, especially in schizophreniform disorder and bipolar disorder. However, a thorough initial assessment of patient and family by a specialized team of investigators regarding the kind and duration of patient symptoms may lead to high diagnostic stability, especially in schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder, even in a FEP sample with a relatively short duration of untreated psychosis.     

Are negative symptoms associated with functioning deficits in both schizophrenia and nonschizophrenia patients? A 10-year longitudinal analysis

The current analyses assess the functional correlates of negative symptoms across diagnoses and across time to assess the appropriateness of a dimensional approach to the study of negative symptoms--specifically, whether negative symptoms should be studied as a single construct across diagnostic groups. Seventy-two schizophrenia/schizoaffective, 36 other psychotic, and 42 nonpsychotic depressed patients were recruited at index hospitalization and were followed up 4.5, 7.5, and 10 years later. At each followup assessment, data were collected on symptoms and adaptive and cognitive functioning. Analyses indicated that negative symptoms showed some similar functional associates in all three diagnostic groups, although results were strongest for the schizophrenia spectrum patients. Negative symptoms at the 10-year followup were associated with different patterns of social deficits prior to index hospitalization in the three diagnostic groups. The data provide some support for a dimensional approach to the study of mental illness, with negative symptoms associated with deficits across diagnosis, but also provide evidence of some diagnostic differences.     

Mobility limitations in persons with psychotic disorder: findings from a population-based survey

BACKGROUND: There are few reports on mobility limitations in persons with psychotic disorder although restrictions in mobility may aggravate the general functional limitations of these patients. Our aim was to investigate mobility limitations among subjects with psychotic disorder in a general population-based sample. METHODS: A nationally representative sample of 6,927 persons aged 30 and older self-reported mobility limitations in an interview and was examined in performance tests. Diagnostic assessment of DSM-IV psychotic disorders combined SCID interview and case note data. Lifetime-ever diagnoses of psychotic disorder were classified into schizophrenia, other nonaffective psychotic disorders and affective psychoses. RESULTS: Self-reported mobility limitations were highly prevalent in persons with schizophrenia and other nonaffective psychosis, but not in the affective psychosis group. After adjusting for age and sex, persons with schizophrenia and other nonaffective psychoses but not affective psychoses had significantly increased odds of having both self-reported and test-based mobility limitations as well as weak muscle strength. Schizophrenia remained an independent predictor of mobility limitations even after controlling for lifestyle-related factors and chronic medical conditions. Among persons with nonaffective psychoses, higher levels of negative symptoms predicted mobility limitations. CONCLUSION: Self-reported mobility limitations are prevalent already at a young age in persons with schizophrenia and other nonaffective psychotic disorders, and among older persons with these disorders both self-reported limitations and measured performance tests show lower capacity in mobility. Difficulties in mobility are associated with negative symptoms. Mental health care professionals should pay attention to mobility limitations in persons with psychotic disorder.     

The factor structure for positive and negative symptoms in South African Xhosa patients with schizophrenia

Most studies investigating the symptom dimensions of schizophrenia utilising the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) and the Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms (SAPS) favour a three factor model. This study sought to investigate the factor structure of both the global and individual items of the SANS and SAPS in a large sample of South African Xhosa patients with schizophrenia. A total of 422 subjects participated. Both principal components and factor analytical procedures were applied. For the global items, a two-factor solution representing positive and negative symptoms accounted for 59.9% of the variance. Alternatively, the three-dimensional model of negative, psychotic and disorganisation factors was supported by a five-factor solution if the more heterogeneous items of attention and alogia were ignored. Analysis of the individual items yielded a five-factor solution with the negative symptoms splitting into diminished expression and disordered relating, and the positive symptoms separating into factors for psychosis, thought disorder and bizarre behaviour. Our findings are very similar to those from other parts of the world, providing evidence that the factor structure for the symptoms of schizophrenia is relatively resistant to cultural influences. This is particularly true for negative symptoms.     

Diagnostic stability 2 years after treatment initiation in the early psychosis intervention programme in Singapore

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic stability of psychotic disorders over a 2 year period in patients presenting with first-episode psychosis. METHODS: One hundred and fifty-four patients were recruited from an early psychosis intervention programme (EPIP). They were diagnosed by the attending psychiatrist using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I at first contact (baseline) and after 24 months. The diagnoses were classified into the following categories: schizophrenia spectrum disorders (schizophrenia, schizophreniform disorder and schizoaffective disorder), affective psychosis (bipolar and major depressive disorders with psychotic symptoms), and other non-affective psychosis (delusional disorder, psychosis not otherwise specified and brief psychotic disorder). Two measures of stability, the prospective and the retrospective consistency were determined for each diagnosis. RESULTS: The diagnoses with the best prospective consistency were schizophrenia (87.0%) and affective psychosis (54.5%). The shift into schizophrenia spectrum disorder was the most frequent diagnostic change. Duration of untreated psychosis was found to be the only significant predictor of shift. CONCLUSION: It is difficult to make a definitive diagnosis at first contact. The clinical need to review the diagnosis throughout the period of follow up is emphasized.     

Diagnosis and six-month stability of negative symptoms in psychotic disorders

Negative symptoms were examined in 150 primarily first-admission patients diagnosed with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, psychotic depression, psychotic bipolar disorder, and other psychoses. The analysis focused on patients who were rated on the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) within 45 days of admission and at follow-up 6 months later. Significantly more schizophrenics had moderate to severe negative symptoms at each time point compared with other psychotic patients. The SANS scores were found to be relatively stable over time in all five diagnostic groups. Although the DSM-IV includes alogia, effective flattening, and avolition in the A criterion for schizophrenia, only alogia and affective flattening were found to be specific to this disorder. Our results point to the existence and enduring quality of negative symptoms in the early phase of psychosis and its specificity to schizophrenia even at this early stage.     

Cognitive functioning in young people with first episode psychosis: relationship to diagnosis and clinical characteristics

OBJECTIVE: To examine the extent and nature of neuropsychological deficits in adolescents and young people with first episode psychosis (FEP), and to determine whether the pattern and extent of neuropsychological deficits varied according to diagnosis. METHOD: A total of 83 FEP subjects aged 13-25 years, and 31 healthy controls completed a comprehensive battery of neuropsychological tests, grouped into 10 cognitive domains. First episode psychosis subjects were stratified into three diagnostic groups (schizophrenia, affective disorders, substance-induced psychosis) and differences in cognitive profiles were examined. The contribution of demographic and clinical characteristics to cognitive performance was also explored. RESULTS: The schizophrenia group demonstrated significantly worse performance on tasks of verbal learning and memory than the affective disorders group. Compared to healthy controls, the schizophrenia group also demonstrated global impairment across the majority of cognitive domains. The substance-induced group's performance lay between that of the schizophrenia and affective disorders groups. Analyses of differential deficits revealed that verbal learning, verbal memory and current intellectual functioning were selectively impaired in the schizophrenia group, whereas the affective disorders group demonstrated a selective deficit in speeded processing. Premorbid intellectual functioning, negative symptomatology and medication levels were the strongest predictors of cognitive performance in FEP subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Verbal memory deficits differentiate individuals with schizophrenia from those with psychotic affective disorders. Although significant cognitive deficits are evident across all diagnostic FEP groups, individuals with schizophrenia appear to have more generalized impairment across a broad array of cognitive functions than other psychotic diagnoses. Lower premorbid intellectual functioning does not appear to contribute to greater cognitive deterioration following onset of psychosis, but severity of illness may be a more important factor than levels of mood disturbance.     

Cross-sectional similarities and differences between schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder and mania or mixed mania with mood-incongruent psychotic features.

BACKGROUND: The cross-sectional clinical differentiation of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder from mood-incongruent psychotic mania or mixed mania is difficult, since pathognomonic symptoms are lacking in these conditions. AIMS OF THE STUDY: To compare a series of clinical variables related to mood and cognition in patient groups with DSM-III-R diagnosis of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, mood-incongruent psychotic mania and mood-incongruent psychotic mixed mania. METHODS: One hundred and fifty-one consecutive patients were evaluated in the week prior to discharge by using the structured clinical interview for DSM-III-R-patient edition (SCID-P). Severity of psychopathology was assessed by the 18-item version of the brief psychiatric rating scale (BPRS) and negative symptoms by the scale for assessment of negative symptoms (SANS). Level of insight was assessed with the scale to assess unawareness of mental disorders (SUMD). RESULTS: There were no differences in rates of specific types of delusions and hallucinations between subjects with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, psychotic mania and psychotic mixed mania. SANS factors scores were significantly higher in patients with schizophrenia than in the bipolar groups. Patients with mixed state scored significantly higher on depression and excitement compared to schizophrenia group and, to a lesser extent, to schizoaffective group. Subjects with schizophrenia showed highest scores on the SUMD indicating that they were much more compromised on the insight dimension than subjects with psychotic mania or mixed mania. CONCLUSION: Negative rather than affective symptomatology may be a useful construct to differentiate between schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorders from mood-incongruent psychotic mania or mixed mania.     

Schizophreniform disorder,delusional disorder and psychotic disorder not otherwise specified: clinical features,outcome and familial psychopathology

The relationship between DSM-III-R schizophreniform disorder, delusional disorder (DD) and psychotic disorder not otherwise specified (PD-NOS) and schizophrenia and affective illness (AI) remains uncertain. We explore this question in the Roscommon Family Study by examining symptoms, outcome and patterns of psychopathology in relatives. Probands were selected from a population-based case registry in the west of Ireland with an ICD-9 diagnosis of schizophrenia or AI. Personal interviews were conducted with 88% of traceable, living probands, a mean of 16 years after onset, and 86% of traceable, living first-degree relatives. Best-estimate diagnoses were made at follow-up. Schizophreniform disorder, DD and PD-NOS constituted 6.4%, 2.8% and 7.5%, respectively, of all probands with a registry diagnosis of schizophrenia. Probands with schizophreniform disorder had prominent positive psychotic symptoms, negligible negative symptoms and a good outcome, comparable to that seen in AI probands. Their relatives had an excess risk of schizophrenia spectrum illness but not AI. Probands with DD had prominent delusions but no other psychotic symptoms, few negative symptoms, fair to good outcome and an increased risk in relatives for alcoholism. Probands with PD-NOS had both moderate positive and negative psychotic symptoms, a poor to fair outcome and a substantially elevated risk in relatives of schizophrenia and schizophrenia spectrum disorders but not AI. These results suggest that i) DSM-III-R criteria for schizophreniform disorder define a good outcome disorder with prominent positive psychotic symptoms that probably has a familial relationship to schizophrenia, but not AI; ii) DD is a rare, monosymptomatic psychosis that may have a modest etiologic relationship with alcoholism, but probably not with schizophrenia or AI and iii) PD-NOS is probably heterogeneous but, of these 3 disorders, most closely resembles schizophrenia with respect to symptoms, outcome and familial psychopathology. These results should be seen as tentative given the small number of probands and relatives evaluated.     

Prospective study of adolescents with subsyndromal psychosis: characteristics and outcome

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine the characteristics and outcome of adolescents with psychotic disorder not otherwise specified (PsyNOS) and brief psychotic disorder (BrPsy), two neglected subsyndromal diagnostic entities. METHODS: As part of an ongoing, naturalistic study investigating adolescents considered to be prodromal for schizophrenia, 29 youngsters (mean age, 16.2 +/- 2.7 years) with PsyNOS or BrPsy were identified as theoretically at highest risk for schizophrenia and followed for over 6 (mean, 22.8 +/- 19.4) months. RESULTS: Contrary to our expectations, only 7 of the 26 individuals (27.0%) with follow-up data developed schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder, and only 2 subjects (7.7%) retained their diagnosis of BrPsy/PsyNOS. The most frequent other diagnoses at follow-up were mood disorders (34.6%), personality disorders (11.5%), and obsessive-compulsive disorder (7.7%). Regarding severity of outcome, 38.5% of the patients progressed to a syndromal psychotic disorder, 23.1% continued to have attenuated positive symptoms, and 38.4% improved to having attenuated negative symptoms only, or no positive or negative symptoms. BrPsy was associated with lower maximum levels of negative symptoms (p = 0.02) and higher likelihood of symptom remission (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that psychotic symptoms not fulfilling criteria for schizophrenia or a psychotic mood disorder are unreliable predictors of a syndromal psychotic disorder outcome at 2 years. Long-term studies of PsyNOS and BrPsy are needed to clarify where these disorders fall in the developmental course of schizophrenia.     

Diagnostic agreement of schizophrenia spectrum disorders among chronic patients with functional psychoses

BACKGROUND: To investigate whether diagnostic agreement across different diagnostic systems improves in a sample of chronic patients suffering from functional psychosis compared to first-admitted patients. SAMPLING AND METHODS: Among 353 patients with a history of functional psychosis, a subset of 100 individuals (35 women and 65 men) were randomly sampled and assessed using the Operational Criteria Checklist for Psychotic Illness and Affective Illness (OPCRIT). Based on the OPCRIT diagnoses the subjects suffering from schizophrenia and schizophrenia spectrum disorders according to seven diagnostic systems were identified. Diagnostic agreement was assessed using unweighted kappa-statistics and pairwise concordance rates (CR). RESULTS: High diagnostic agreement of schizophrenia was observed across the ICD-10 and DSM systems (CR >0.70, kappa >0.70), which all had a significantly lower concordance to the St. Louis Criteria (SLC), research diagnostic criteria and Schneider's first rank symptoms (FRS) (0.32< CR <0.66; -0.10< kappa <0.51). Agreement on schizophrenia across all systems was observed for one fourth of the subjects. Elimination of the diagnostic impact of 'co-occurrence of psychotic and affective symptoms' excluded FRS standalone individuals from the sample, increased overall homogeneity and resulted in a dichotomized sample according to SLC (46 positive vs. 47 negative). SLC status could be predicted in 78% of cases by four items relating to family history and psychosocial function previous to the onset of illness. Similarly high pairwise CR were observed for schizophrenia spectrum disorders across all diagnostic systems. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that diagnostic agreement is higher among chronic patients than that observed in subjects with a recent onset of psychosis, although considerable discordance is also observed in this chronic sample. However, the discordance among chronic patients with functional psychosis largely derives from the different emphasis that diagnostic systems place on co-occurrence of psychotic and affective symptoms. This may have serious epistemological consequences, thus underlining the conventional nature of the present schizophrenia diagnoses and the need for biologically founded diagnostic criteria.     

Smoking in schizophrenia: diagnostic specificity, symptom correlates, and illness severity

Background: Cigarette smoking was consistently found to be more prevalent in individuals with schizophrenia than in other psychiatric groups and the general population. These findings have been interpreted as evidence of a specific association between schizophrenia and smoking. However, the supporting data come primarily from cross-sectional studies, which are susceptible to confounding. Our aim was to test specificity of this link longitudinally in an epidemiologic sample. Methods: A cohort of 542 inpatients with psychosis was followed for 10 years after first hospitalization, completing 5 face-to-face interviews. Assessments included ratings of specific symptoms (psychotic, negative, disorganized, and depressive), Global Assessment of Functioning, and a categorical measure of cigarette consumption. All participants were assigned longitudinal consensus diagnoses by study psychiatrists, and 229 were diagnosed with schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SZ). Results: At baseline, 52.4% of participants were current smokers and 69.3% were lifetime smokers. Smoking rates did not differ among the diagnostic groups (schizophrenia spectrum, major depressive, bipolar, or other psychotic disorder) at any assessment point. Smokers were more severely ill than nonsmokers but did not differ in specific symptoms either cross-sectionally or longitudinally. Among smokers, changes in cigarette consumption were linked only with changes in depression (β = .16, P < .001). Conclusions: Rates of smoking were elevated in subjects with schizophrenia but were just as high with other psychotic disorders. Smoking was not associated with psychotic symptoms, but cigarette consumption covaried with depression over time. Given the devastating health consequences of cigarette use, smoking cessation interventions are urgently needed in this population and should specifically address depression.     

Depressive and negative symptoms in major psychiatric disorders

Among 193 inpatients with Research Diagnostic Criteria (RDC) major psychiatric disorders, the scores in Hamilton's Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) were higher among those patients with RDC schizoaffective disorder depressed type and major depressive disorder, whereas the scores in the Scale for Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) were higher among patients with these two disorders, as well as those with RDC nonaffective psychoses (schizophrenia and unspecified functional psychosis). The HRSD and SANS items were factor-analyzed, yielding nine factors that discriminated depressive and negative symptoms. These findings suggest that although depressive and negative symptoms frequently coexist, they constitute discrete syndromes.     

Major self-mutilation in the first episode of psychosis

Major self-mutilation (MSM) is a rare but catastrophic complication of severe mental illness. Most people who inflict MSM have a psychotic disorder, usually a schizophrenia spectrum psychosis. It is not known when in the course of psychotic illness, MSM is most likely to occur. In this study, the proportion of patients in first episode of psychosis (FEP) was assessed using the results of a systematic review of published case reports. Histories of patients who had removed an eye or a testicle, severed their penis, or amputated a portion of a limb and were diagnosed with a schizophrenia spectrum psychosis were included. A psychotic illness was documented in 143 of 189 cases (75.6%) of MSM, of whom 119 of 143 (83.2%) were diagnosed with a schizophrenia spectrum psychosis. The treatment status of a schizophrenia spectrum psychosis could be ascertained in 101 of the case reports, of which 54 were in the FEP (53.5%, 95% confidence interval = 43.7%-63.2%). Patients who inflict MSM in FEP exhibited similar symptoms to those who inflict MSM later in their illness. Acute psychosis, in particular first-episode schizophrenia, appears to be the major cause of MSM. Although MSM is extremely uncommon, earlier treatment of psychotic illness may reduce the incidence of MSM.     

Does operational diagnosis of schizophrenia significantly impact intellectual deficits in psychotic disorders?

Background Evidence suggests that, as a group, patients with schizophrenia have intellectual deficits that may precede the manifestation of psychotic symptoms; however, how successfully intelligence tests are able to discriminate schizophrenia from other psychotic disorders has yet to be investigated in detail. Methods Using Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale – Revised (WAIS‐R) data for 55 inpatients with schizophrenia and 28 inpatients with non‐schizophrenic psychotic disorders (NSPD) (schizophreniform disorder, brief psychotic disorder, delusional disorder, psychotic disorder due to a general medical condition, and psychotic disorders not otherwise specified), intelligence performance was compared between schizophrenia and NSPD and among different subtypes of schizophrenia. Results There were no significant differences in intelligence quotient (IQ), verbal IQ (VIQ) and performance IQ (PIQ) discrepancy, and subtest scores of WAIS‐R between the patients with schizophrenia and those with NSPD. These diagnostic groups were not discriminated well by any WAIS‐R variables. Schizophrenia patients with prominent negative symptoms, on the other hand, had a significantly larger IQ discrepancy (VIQ > PIQ) than those without prominent negative symptoms and NSPD patients. Intelligence performance in schizophrenia did not differ with respect to diagnostic subtypes and longitudinal courses. Conclusions The current study failed to show diagnostic usefulness of WAIS‐R in discriminating schizophrenia and other psychoses. A diagnosis of schizophrenia does not significantly impact intellectual deficits in psychotic disorders.     

Facial emotion perception in schizophrenia: Does sex matter?

AIM: To review the literature on sex differences in facial emotion perception (FEP) across the schizophrenia spectrum. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of empirical articles that were included in five separate meta-analyses of FEP across the schizophrenia spectrum, including meta-analyses that predominantly examined adults with chronic schizophrenia, people with early (onset prior to age 18) or recent-onset (experiencing their first or second psychotic episode or illness duration less than 2 years) schizophrenia, and unaffected first-degree relatives of people with schizophrenia. We also examined articles written in English (from November 2011 through June 2015) that were not included in the aforementioned meta-analyses through a literature search in the PubMed database. All relevant articles were accessed in full text. We examined all studies to determine the sample sizes, diagnostic characteristics, demographic information, methodologies, results, and whether each individual study reported on sex differences. The results from the meta-analyses themselves as well as the individual studies are reported in tables and text. RESULTS: We retrieved 134 articles included in five separate meta-analyses and the PubMed database that examined FEP across the schizophrenia spectrum. Of these articles, 38 examined sex differences in FEP. Thirty of these studies did not find sex differences in FEP in either chronically ill adults with schizophrenia, early-onset or recently diagnosed people with schizophrenia, or first-degree relatives of people with schizophrenia. Of the eight studies that found sex differences in FEP, three found that chronically ill women outperformed men, one study found that girls with early-onset schizophrenia outperformed boys, and two studies found that women (including first-degree relatives, adults with schizophrenia, and the healthy control group) outperformed men on FEP tasks. In total, six of the eight studies that examined sex differences in FEP found that women outperformed men across the schizophrenia spectrum. CONCLUSION: Evidence to date suggests few sex differences in FEP in schizophrenia; both men and women across the schizophrenia spectrum have deficits in FEP.     

Familial association of schizotypal traits with psychotic and affective disorders

The criteria for schizotypal personality disorder were developed on the basis of traits observed in biologic relatives of schizophrenic and borderline schizophrenic probands from the Danish adoption studies. In this review, the relationship between schizotypal personality disorder and the schizophrenic spectrum, affective disorders, and psychotic disorders is explored. A dimension of psychosis may overlap with the schizophrenia spectrum to yield chronic schizophrenia, with the affective disorders spectrum to yield psychotic affective disorder, or by itself lead to other psychotic disorders. Schizotypal personality disorder in this model is posited to represent schizophrenia spectrum disorder that does not overlap with psychosis, whereas nonpsychotic affective disorders represent the affective disorders that do not overlap with psychosis. Delusional disorder represents another psychotic disorder that is not specifically related to either schizophrenia or the affective disorders. Evidence suggests that the schizotypal personality disorder criteria, particularly those emphasizing the negative symptoms or deficit-like symptoms of this disorder, specifically identify a unique relationship to the schizophrenia spectrum.     

Formal thought disorder in first-episode psychosis

Formal thought disorder (FTD) is one of the fundamental symptom clusters of schizophrenia and it was found to be the strongest predictor determining conversion from first-episode acute transient psychotic disorder to schizophrenia. Our goal in the present study was to compare a first-episode psychosis (FEP) sample to a healthy control group in relation to subtypes of FTD. Fifty six patients aged between 15 and 45 years with FEP and forty five control subjects were included in the study. All the patients were under medication for less than six weeks or drug-naive. FTD was assessed using the Thought and Language Index (TLI), which is composed of impoverishment of thought and disorganization of thought subscales. FEP patients showed significantly higher scores on the items of poverty of speech, weakening of goal, perseveration, looseness, peculiar word use, peculiar sentence construction and peculiar logic compared to controls. Poverty of speech, perseveration and peculiar word use were the significant factors differentiating FEP patients from controls when controlling for years of education, family history of psychosis and drug abuse.