A larger aortic annulus causes aortic regurgitation and a smaller aortic annulus causes aortic stenosis in bicuspid aortic valve

A bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) often causes aortic stenosis (AS) or regurgitation (AR). In 54 patients with a BAV (48 +/- 16 years), transthoracic and transesophageal echo were performed to measure aortic annulus diameter (AAD), to evaluate the severity of aortic valve disease (AVD) and to calculate the area eccentricity index (AEI) of a BAV defined as a ratio of the larger aortic cusp area to a smaller aortic cusp area. By multiple linear regression analysis, the severity of AR correlated significantly with the AAD (r = 0.38) and AEI (r = 0.35) (P < 0.05) and that of AS correlated significantly with the AAD (r =-0.40) and AEI (r = 0.34) (P < 0.05). Thirty-six patients showed anteroposteriorly (A-P) located BAVs and 18 patients showed right-left (R-L) located BAVs. The AAD was larger in A-P type than in R-L type (15 +/- 3 vs 13 +/- 2 mm/BSA, P < 0.05) and there was no difference in the age and AEI between the two groups. AR was more severe in A-P type than in R-L type while AS was more severe in R-L type than in A-P type (P < 0.05). Twenty-nine patients showed raphes. The AEI was larger in raphe (+) type than in raphe (-) type (1.83 +/- 0.53 vs 1.51 +/- 0.47, P < 0.05) and there was no difference in the AAD and severity of AVD between the two groups. In conclusion, a BAV with larger aortic annulus or A-P located will tend to cause AR while a BAV with smaller aortic annulus or R-L located will tend to cause AS.     

Quadricuspid aortic valve with severe aortic regurgitation

Quadricuspid aortic valve is a rare congenital anomaly that usually presents with aortic regurgitation. Its importance, however, lies in its association with coronary abnormalities, which may lead to surgical catastrophe, if not diagnosed pre-operatively. This report describes a case of quadricuspid aortic valve detected incidentally during routine pre-operative transesophageal echocardiography.     

�������в� �ڼ�Ѫ�׺ʹ�͸������Ӱ��ѧ����½�չ

文章论述主动脉夹层(AD)、主动脉壁间血肿(出血)、主动脉穿透性溃疡的影像学诊断的进展,并讨论三者的关系,提出影像学检查在诊断和鉴别诊断中具有重要的作用。     

In-vitro comparison of aortic valve hemodynamics between aortic root remodeling and aortic valve reimplantation

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: Valve-preserving aortic replacement has become an accepted option for patients with aortic valve regurgitation and aortic dilatation. The relative role of root remodeling versus valve reimplantation inside a vascular graft has been discussed, albeit controversially. In the present study, an in-vitro model was used to investigate the aortic valve hemodynamics of root remodeling and valve reimplantation; roots with supracommissural aortic replacement served as controls. METHODS: Aortic roots with aortoventricular diameter 21 mm were obtained from pigs. Root remodeling was performed using a 22-mm graft (group I, n = 6), or valve reimplantation with a 24-mm graft (group II, n = 7). Control roots were treated by supracommissural aortic replacement (22-mm graft; group III, n = 7). Using an electrohydraulic, computer-controlled pulse duplicator, the valves were tested at flows of 2, 4, 5, 7, and 9 I/min at a heart rate of 70 /min and a mean arterial pressure of 100 mmHg. Parameters assessed included: mean pressure gradient, effective orifice area, valve closure and regurgitant volume, and energy loss due to ejection, valve closure and regurgitation. Data were compared using ANOVA. RESULTS: There were no differences between the three groups in terms of regurgitant volume, energy loss due to valve regurgitation, or valve closure. The aortic valve orifice area was largest and systolic gradient lowest in group I at all flow rates (p < 0.001). Ejection energy loss was lowest in group I at all flow rates (9 l/min: group I, 128 +/- 21 mJ; group II, 399 +/- 46 mJ; group III, 312 +/- 27 mJ; p < 0.001). Valve closure volumes were similar in groups I and III, but significantly lower in group II at all flow rates (p = 0.047). CONCLUSION: In this standardized experimental setting, root remodeling--but not valve reimplantation--resulted in physiologic hemodynamic performance of the aortic valve with regard to orifice area, pressure gradient, and systolic energy loss.     

Bicuspid aortic valve: abnormal aortic elastic properties

BACKGROUND AND AIMS OF THE STUDY: Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is frequently associated with clinically relevant abnormalities of the aorta, suggesting the existence of a common underlying developmental defect involving the aortic valve and wall of the ascending aorta. The study aim was to evaluate noninvasively the elastic properties of the aortic root in young males with BAV, to discover whether structural abnormalities of the aorta might be manifested by impairment in elasticity. METHODS: Forty-nine young male subjects with isolated BAV were consecutively detected during preenrollment military screening, and studied using transthoracic echocardiography. Data were compared with those obtained in 45 normal subjects, matched for gender and age. RESULTS: Patients and controls were comparable for body size, and systolic and diastolic blood pressures. BAVs were normally functioning in 18 patients (37%), and mildly regurgitant in 31 (63%). Measurements made by two-dimensional echocardiography showed that BAV patients had significantly larger aortic root dimensions at the annulus (2.4+/-0.2 versus 2.2+/-0.2 cm, p <0.001), at the sinus of Valsalva (3.3+/-0.4 versus 2.6+/-0.3 cm, p <0.001), at the sinotubular junction (2.9+/-0.3 versus 2.5+/-0.2 cm, p <0.001), and at the proximal ascending aorta (2.8+/-0.3 versus 2.5+/-0.2 cm, p <0.001). Measurements made using M-mode echocardiography at 3 cm from the annulus, showed the difference between systolic and diastolic diameters of the aortic root to be significantly smaller in patients than in controls (2.1+/-1.2 versus 3.0+/-1.1 mm, respectively, p <0.001). In patients and in controls, both aortic distensibility (2.7+/-1.5 versus 4.8+/-2.2 x 10(-6) cm2 dyne(-1), respectively, p <0.001) and aortic stiffness index (10.2+/-5.3 versus 5.03+/-1.97, respectively, p <0.001) were significantly different. CONCLUSION: Young male subjects with BAV and no or mild aortic regurgitation display large aortic size and abnormal elastic properties of the ascending aorta compared with controls. These findings confirm the notion that, in these patients, aortic root dilatation is a morphological correlate of intrinsic structural aortic abnormality.     

Repeat balloon aortic valvuloplasty for aortic valve restenosis

Effective balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) is limited restenosis. After aortic valve restenosis six patients underwent repeat BAV. In spite of the use of larger balloons there was a trend toward a less satisfactory result after repeat BAV (0.98 +/- .26 cm2 vs. 1.2 +/- .26 cm2), which did not reach statistical significance, P = .14. Mortality of the patients at 6 months was 50%. Repeat BAV may be less efficacious than the original procedure.