Implantation of the distal aorta: A technique for preservation of pelvic blood flow in aortofemoral reconstruction

We report our initial experience with a previously undescribed variation of aortofemoral bypass. This technique is an alternative to end-to-side aortic anastomosis for preservation of pelvic blood flow. It involves an end-to-end proximal aortic anastomosis with implantation of the distal aorta into the posterior wall of the bifurcation graft. This approach has been used selectively for nine patients. Seven patients operated on using this technique had bilateral external iliac artery disease preventing retrograde perfusion of the pelvis. We used this procedure in two other young patients to preserve large inferior mesenteric and distal aortic lumbar vessels proximal to common iliac artery occlusions. Mean follow-up has been 20 months. There have been no deaths and no major complications. This technique provides the hemodynamic benefit of a proximal end-to-end aortic anastomosis while maintaining patency of the distal aorta and its branches. Additional technical advantages may include better suture line protection from the duodenum and a decreased potential for graft limb kinking. These factors may ultimately result in superior long- term graft patency.Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Peripheral Vascular Surgery Society, New York, New York, June 17, 1989.     

Fate of the iliac arteries after repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm with an aortobifemoral bypass graft

The objective of this study is to determine the fate of the iliac arteries after repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm with an aortobifemoral bypass graft. It is a prospective natural history study at a university-affiliated urban teaching hospital. Thirty-two patients with retrograde flow to the iliac circulation after repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm by aortobifemoral bypass grafting were studied. All patients were followed prospectively with repeat CAT scans, clinical assessment, and selective angiography to determine the fate of the iliac circulation. We were particularly interested in subsequent vessel thrombosis or aneurysmal dilation. Patient survival was analyzed with a Kaplan-Meier life-table and survival curve. Graft patency was analyzed using life-table analysis. Primary outcomes included iliac artery size, graft patency, and patient survival. The iliac arteries remained constant in size or thrombosed in all study patients. Iliac expansion did not occur in any of the study patients. Secondary graft patency was 100%. The cumulative survival rate at 47 months was 0.55 (0.37–0.74,95% confidence interval). Retrograde perfusion of diseased iliac arteries after aortobifemoral bypass for repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm is safe. Iliac artery atherosclerotic, ectatic or small aneurysmal disease (≤3 cm) does not appear to be a contraindication to retrograde iliac artery perfusion.     

Spinal cord ischemia after abdominal aortic operation: is it preventable?

PURPOSE: Spinal cord ischemia after operation on the abdominal aorta is a rare event that is attributed to variations in the spinal cord blood supply. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the possible causes of this devastating event. METHODS: A survey of patients among the members of the Southern Association for Vascular Surgery was performed, and 18 patients were identified with spinal cord ischemia manifested by paraplegia or paraparesis after abdominal aortic operation. RESULTS: Preoperative computed tomographic, magnetic resonance, and aortographic results did not visualize the greater radicular artery (Adamkiewicz's artery) in any patient. Eleven patients underwent resection of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs): seven of these patients had tube grafts, three had aortobifemoral grafts, and one had an aortobiiliac graft. Five other patients underwent placement of aortobifemoral grafts, and one patient underwent aortobiiliac graft placement for occlusive disease. One patient underwent suprarenal AAA resection with an interposition graft to a previous aortobiiliac graft. The mean operative time was 3 hours and 39 minutes (range, 2 hours and 45 minutes to 6 hours and 30 minutes), with a mean aortic cross-clamp time of 48 minutes (range, 24 to 97 minutes). Sixteen aortic cross-clamps were placed infrarenally and two suprarenally (one in a case of ruptured AAA, the other a suprarenal AAA). Seventeen proximal anastomoses were end to end. The average minimum systolic blood pressure during the aortic cross-clamping was 96 mm Hg (range, 80 to 130 mm Hg). All the patients had internal iliac artery flow preserved with either prograde perfusion (10 patients) or retrograde perfusion (eight patients), and one patient underwent unilateral internal iliac artery ligation because of aneurysmal disease. One aortobifemoral-graft limb necessitated thrombectomy, but no cases of massive peripheral embolization occurred. When paraplegia was suspected after operation (6 to 20 hours after surgery), five patients underwent lumbar drainage. No clinical improvement was noted. CONCLUSION: Interference with pelvic blood supply from prolonged aortic cross clamping, intraoperative hypotension, aortic embolization, and interruption of internal iliac artery circulation have all been suggested as possible causes of spinal cord ischemia. In this survey, none of these factors proved to be significant as the sole cause of spinal cord ischemia. In the performance of an aortic operation with an end-to-end proximal anastomosis in the presence of severe external or internal iliac artery disease, there may be an increased incidence of spinal cord ischemia despite appropriate surgical techniques to ensure internal iliac perfusion. Spinal cord ischemia after abdominal aortic operations appears to be a tragically unpredictable, random, and unpreventable event.     

Internal iliac artery revascularization as an adjunct to endovascular repair of aortoiliac aneurysms.

PURPOSE: Endovascular repair of aortoiliac aneurysms may be limited by extension of the aneurysm to the iliac bifurcation, necessitating endpoint implantation in the external iliac artery. In such cases the circulation to the internal iliac artery is interrupted. Bilateral internal iliac artery occlusion during endovascular repair may be associated with significant morbidity, including gluteal claudication, erectile dysfunction, and ischemia of the sigmoid colon and perineum. We have employed internal iliac artery revascularization (IIR) to allow endograft implantation in the external iliac artery while preserving flow to the internal iliac artery in patients with aneurysms involving the iliac bifurcation bilaterally. METHODS: A total of 11 IIR procedures were performed in 10 patients undergoing endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair (9 men, 1 woman; mean age, 74 years). IIR was accomplished via a retroinguinal incision in 9 cases and a retroperitoneal incision in 2 cases. Six-mm polyester grafts were used for external-to-internal iliac artery bypass in 10 cases and internal iliac artery transposition onto the external iliac artery was used in one case. Endovascular AAA repair was performed using a modular bifurcated device (Talent-LPS, Medtronics, Minneapolis, Minn) after IIR. Bypass graft patency was determined immediately after the surgery, at 1 month, and every 3 months thereafter, using duplex ultrasound scanning and computed-tomography angiography. Mean aneurysm diameters were as follows: AAA, 6.4 +/- 0.7 cm; ipsilateral common iliac, 3.7 +/- 1.0 cm; contralateral common iliac, 3.9 +/- 0.8 cm. RESULTS: Successful IIR and endovascular AAA repair were accomplished in all cases. No proximal, distal, or graft junction endoleaks occurred. Two patients demonstrated retrograde aneurysm side-branch endoleaks originating from the lumbar arteries. One thrombosed spontaneously within 3 months. One perioperative myocardial infarction occurred. Reduction in aneurysm size was documented in 5 aortic, 5 ipsilateral iliac, and 3 contralateral iliac aneurysms. Gluteal claudication, erectile dysfunction, colon and perineal ischemia, and mortality did not occur. All IIRs have remained patent during a follow-up period of 4 to 15 months (mean, 10.1 months). CONCLUSIONS: IIR may be used with good short-term to intermediate-term patency to prevent pelvic ischemia in patients whose aneurysm anatomy requires extension of the endograft into the external iliac artery. This may allow endovascular AAA repair to be performed in patients who might otherwise be at risk for developing complications associated with bilateral internal iliac artery occlusion.     

Internal iliac artery revascularization in the treatment of vasculogenic impotence

Five impotent men underwent internal iliac artery revascularization in conjunction with end-to-side aortobifemoral bypass after preoperative testing suggested a vasculogenic cause for impotence. All patients had abnormal preoperative penile/brachial arterial pressure indices (mean, 0.42 +/- 0.12). Following operation, all patients regained erectile capability and had normal postoperative penile/brachial indices (mean, 0.80 +/- 0.06). One patient developed retrograde ejaculation, emphasizing the need for meticulous nerve-sparing dissection with this operation. Internal iliac artery revascularization in conjunction with end-to-side aortobifemoral bypass is effective in relieving vasculogenic impotence in properly selected patients.     

Descending thoracic aortobifemoral bypass: an alternative approach for difficult aortic revascularization

Descending thoracic aortobifemoral bypass is an alternative inflow operation in cases in which standard aortobifemoral or axillobifemoral bypass is not an option. We performed descending thoracic aortobifemoral bypass for failed inflow operations in four patients, prior abdominal/pelvic radiation in two patients, poor quality distal aorta (extensive atherosclerotic disease or poor tissue quality) in two patients, and abdominal sepsis in two patients. Eight have had excellent results with patency at a mean follow-up of 38 months. There was no limb loss. One patient died of organ failure, and one patient with hypercoagulability developed a graft clot. A literature review disclosed that a descending thoracic aortobifemoral bypass was reported to have been performed in 203 patients, with most cases reported in the last decade. This procedure was the primary inflow operation in 42 per cent of cases. Indications for the operation included failed aortic grafts (38%), "hostile" abdomen (21%), infected aortic grafts (18%), and other (23%). The patency rate was 95 per cent at 6 months. Few long-term results are known, but the results appear to be durable. Descending thoracic aortobifemoral bypass is a useful operation in highly selected circumstances in which conventional methods of aortic reconstruction are not available.     

External iliac artery-to-internal iliac artery endograft: a novel approach to preserve pelvic inflow in aortoiliac stent grafting.

PURPOSE: To describe four patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm and bilateral common iliac artery aneurysms repaired by coil embolization of the ipsilateral internal iliac artery, aortouniiliac endograft extended to the ipsilateral external iliac artery, femorofemoral bypass grafting, and a contralateral external iliac to internal iliac stent graft to preserve pelvic perfusion. METHODS: Four patients with multiple risk factors, abdominal aortic aneurysm (mean diameter, 6.6 cm), and bilateral common iliac artery aneurysms were evaluated with contrast-enhanced computed tomography scanning, arteriography, and intravascular ultrasonography. Aortobiiliac endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair was not feasible because of extension of the common iliac artery aneurysms to the iliac bifurcation bilaterally. RESULTS: The abdominal aortic aneurysms were repaired with an aortouniiliac endograft. The ipsilateral common iliac artery aneurysms were treated by coil embolization of the internal iliac artery and extension of the endograft to the external iliac artery. The contralateral common iliac artery aneurysms were excluded by a custom-made stent graft (n = 2) or a commercial stent graft (n = 2) from the external iliac artery to the internal iliac artery, which preserved pelvic inflow via retrograde perfusion from the femorofemoral bypass. Mean length of stay was 3.5 days. One patient had hip claudication. Follow-up (mean 10 months, range 6 to 17) demonstrated exclusion of the abdominal aortic aneurysm and common iliac artery aneurysms with no endoleak and patent external iliac artery-to-internal iliac artery endografts in all patients. CONCLUSION: Patients with bilateral common iliac artery aneurysms that extend to the iliac bifurcation may be excluded from endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair because of concerns regarding pelvic ischemia after occlusion of both internal iliac arteries. External iliac artery-to-internal iliac artery endografting is a feasible alternative to maintain pelvic perfusion and still allow endograft repair of the abdominal aortic aneurysm in these patients.     

Remote endarterectomy: lessons learned after more than 100 cases

BACKGROUND: Bypass procedures have been the mainstay of treatment of extensive external iliac and superficial femoral artery (SFA) occlusive disease, particularly total occlusions. Since the early 1990s, reports from Europe have espoused the virtues of endarterectomy of the superficial femoral and iliac arteries from a small groin incision, but adoption in the United States has been limited. Over the past 4 years, we have explored the technical challenges and durability of this procedure and report our findings. METHODS: Remote endarterectomy from an inguinal incision was the primary treatment option for all patients considered surgical candidates for vascular reconstruction of the external iliac and superficial femoral arteries. All data were entered into an outcomes database prospectively and reviewed retrospectively. After the procedure, duplex ultrasound surveillance was performed quarterly the first year and semi-annually thereafter. RESULTS: Remote endarterectomy was the planned procedure in 133 patients. The mean age was 68 years, 68% were men, and 31% were diabetic. The indications for the procedure were claudication in 57% and limb salvage in 43%. In 16 patients (12%), technical issues precluded the completion of the remote endarterectomy and a bypass was performed. Successful retrograde iliac endarterectomy was performed in 7 patients, SFA endarterectomy in 105 patients, and combined retrograde iliac and antegrade SFA in 5 patients. The average duration of the procedure was 162 minutes +/- 69 minutes (SD). Half of the patients were discharged on the first postoperative day, and the average length of stay was 2.52 days. The mean follow-up was 19 months, with a primary patency of 70% at 30 months by life-table analysis. Limb salvage was 94%. CONCLUSIONS: Remote endarterectomy is a viable and durable alternative to standard bypass procedures. It has equivalent patency to published results of bypass or endovascular procedures of the external iliac and superficial femoral arteries and may soon replace bypass as the preferred procedure for long-segment occlusions of these vessels.     

Prevention and management of sigmoid and pelvic ischemia associated with aortic surgery.

Ischemia of the colon, rectum, and pelvis continues to be a significant source of morbidity and mortality after aortic reconstruction. Complications associated with colonic and pelvic ischemia are severe and include impotency, buttock claudication, colonic and rectal infarction, buttock and perineal necrosis, and spinal cord or lumbar plexus injury. To prevent these complications the vascular surgeon must make every attempt to guarantee the adequacy of colonic and pelvic blood supply after aortic reconstructive procedures. During open surgical repair of aneurysms or aortoiliac arterial occlusive disease, patent inferior mesenteric arteries must either be routinely reimplanted or selectively ligated on the basis of object intraoperative assessment of colonic perfusion. In addition, when possible, antegrade perfusion should be maintained in patent internal iliac arteries, and femoral reconstructions should include reconstruction of the deep femoral artery to assure adequate perfusion of potential pelvic collaterals. The rate of colonic and pelvic ischemia after endovascular aneurysm repair appears lower than after open repair, but all of the complications of colonic and pelvic ischemic seen after open repairs have been reported after endoluminal aneurysm repair. Thus, during stent-graft repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms, all attempts also should be made to preserve pelvic perfusion by maintaining antegrade flow to a least one patent internal iliac artery. The principle to remember in the management of complications of pelvic ischemia associated with aortic reconstruction is prevention because when complications of pelvic ischemia occur, the damage often is irreversible.     

Pelvic ischemia following aortoiliac reconstruction

Clinically evident compromise of parietal or visceral pelvic function secondary to interruption of pelvic blood flow occurs infrequently after aortoiliac reconstruction. Certain patterns of aortoiliac or occlusive aneurysmal disease or graft infection may require exclusion of the hypogastric or profunda femoral arteries. In these situations collateral blood flow or retrograde iliac flow may be insufficient to perfuse the pelvis and may cause ischemia. We present three cases of postoperative pelvic ischemia and describe our efforts to restore pelvic perfusion.     

Proximal anastomosis in aortobifemoral bypass: end-to-end or end-to-side?

When performing an aortobifemoral bypass, the surgeon may choose between an end-to-end or end-to-side aortic anastomosis. Although several authors have claimed the superiority of the former, controversy still exists. The aim of this study was to compare the early and late results of these two techniques in patients for which both procedures were possible. Of 158 patients, aortic anastomosis was performed end-to-end in 47 (group I) and end-to-side in 111 (group II). Both groups were similar in all other aspects. The type of proximal anastomosis did not affect the rate of perioperative mortality or early thrombosis. There were no secondary aortic aneurysms or aortoenteric fistulae in either group. Actuarial primary (without reoperation) and secondary (after thrombectomy) five year patency rates were 90.2 and 98.9 per cent in group I, and 90.8 and 98.5 per cent in group II, respectively. Five-year limb survival was 95.3 and 95.7 per cent, respectively. As we could not find any difference between the results in the two groups, we suggest choosing the simplest procedure which maintains adequate pelvic and colonic blood supply, according to angiographic findings.     

A novel hybrid approach to the treatment of common iliac aneurysms: antegrade endovascular hypogastric stent grafting and femorofemoral bypass grafting

A progressively enlarging left common iliac artery aneurysm developed in a 72-year-old man 7 years after open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair with a bifurcated Dacron graft. Because both the right hypogastric and inferior mesenteric arteries had been ligated at the initial operation, preservation of left hypogastric flow was critical to avoid pelvic or intestinal ischemia. He was a poor open surgical candidate owing to obesity, a hostile abdomen, and multiple medical comorbidities. Therefore, a novel hybrid approach was used consisting of left transbrachial selective left hypogastric artery catheterization, followed by deployment of two, overlapping, antegrade, covered stent grafts extending from the proximal left graft limb into the left hypogastric artery. A right-to-left femorofemoral crossover bypass was added to perfuse the left lower extremity and was performed in end-to-end fashion to the left common femoral artery to exclude and prevent retrograde flow into the iliac aneurysm. Also presented are potential procedural pitfalls and a detailed review of open, endovascular and hybrid options to preserve hypogastric flow when treating iliac aneurysms in complex, high-risk patients.     

Pelvic hemodynamics after aortoiliac reconstruction

Changes in blood flow to the pelvis were monitored by measurement of penile blood pressures before and after 38 aortoiliac vascular reconstructions. An increase in penile pressure was noted in 14 patients (37%), a decrease was seen in eight patients (21%), and no change occurred in 16 patients (46%). These changes could have been predicted by matching arteriograms to the surgical procedure performed. Preoperative impotence was present in 27 patients (17%). In this group a postoperative increase in penile pressure was associated with restoration of erectile capability in eight of 11 patients. Only one of 10 patients with an unchanged penile pressure regained sexual potency. In contrast, none of the eight patients whose penile pressures decreased had recurrence of erectile capability. Six of these patients had end-to-end aortobifemoral grafts, and concurrent external iliac disease prevented retrograde flow to the internal iliac vessels.     

Subclavian steal syndrome. Part 2: Intraoperative vertebral artery blood flow measurement.

Intraoperative vertebral artery blood flow was measured in two patients with symptomatic subclavian steal syndrome, before and after proximal end-to-side vertebral to common carotid artery transposition. This confirmed retrograde flow in the vertebral artery before transposition, and antegrade flow after transposition. The measured flow rates were compared to values in other series involving different operative procedures for correction of symptomatic subclavian steal. The greatest mean antegrade flow rates in the vertebral artery were restored by proximal end-to-side vertebral to common carotid artery transposition.     

Videoendoscopically assisted combined retroperitoneal and pelvic extraperitoneal approach for aortoiliac occlusive disease

Background Laparoendoscopic surgery has emerged as a new method for the management of iliac and aortoiliac occlusive disease. This article describes a combined retroperitoneal and pelvic extraperitoneal approach to aorta and iliac arteries. Methods A review was performed for 15 patients who underwent videoendoscopically assisted vascular bypass procedures between January 1999 and June 2003. A minimal access approach was used for access to the proximal anastomotic site (proximal common iliac or distal aorta) and creation of a tunnel for the prosthetic graft placement up to the distal anastomotic site. Altogether, 11 iliofemoral bypasses, 2 iliobifemoral bypasses and 2 aortobifemoral bypasses were performed. Patients with diffuse stenosis/long-segment occlusion and multiple lesions for whom percutaneous transluminal angioplasty with stenting proved to be unsuitable were included. The outcome parameters measured were intraoperative time, intraoperative blood loss, skin incision length, length of hospital stay, postoperative pain and analgesia requirement, and patency of graft. Results Videoendoscopy was used to complete14 procedures. The mean operating time was 258 ± 49 min (range, 180–300 min) and the mean blood loss was 124 ± 28.23 ml (range, 80–150ml). The mean hospital stay was 6.7 ± 4.46 days (range, 4–9 days). After a mean follow-up period of 14.4 ± 3.55 months (range, 6–20 months), all grafts were patent. Conclusion Videoendoscopically assisted vascular surgery for iliac and aortoiliac occlusive disease by a combined retroperitoneal and pelvic extraperitoneal approach is feasible and appears to confer many advantages of minimal access surgery. However, prospective randomized trials are needed to define clearly any advantages of this approach over conventional surgery.     

Distal internal iliac artery embolization: a procedure to avoid

OBJECTIVES: Internal iliac artery (IIA) coil embolization as an adjunct to endovascular stent grafting (ESG) is common practice for treating abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in patients with a substantially enlarged common iliac artery requiring extension of the stent-graft limb into the external iliac artery. The literature describing pelvic ischemia in association with IIA coil embolization contains conflicting reports of symptom severity. We studied IIA occlusion outcome as a function of coil placement in the IIA. METHODS: From August 1997 to March 2002, 20 patients with AAA underwent ESG with unilateral IIA coil embolization. Coils were placed proximal to the first branch of the IIA in 8 patients and distal to the first branch in 12 patients. Symptoms of pelvic ischemia and mid-term outcome were studied. RESULTS: Patients included 18 men and 2 women with mean age of 70(1/2) years (range, 53-86 years). Mean diameter of AAA was 54.4 mm (range, 38-80 mm), and of common iliac artery was 24.2 mm (range, 15-48 mm). Ten patients (50%) had new onset of symptoms of pelvic ischemia after endograft procedures: 1 of 8 patients (13%) with proximal IIA embolization had buttock claudication, and 9 of 12 patients (75%) with distal IIA embolization had pelvic ischemic symptoms, including buttock claudication in 8 and impotence in 1 (P =.02, Fisher exact test). No colonic ischemia occurred in this series. At 12-month follow-up, 4 patients with distal IIA embolization were symptom-free. At further follow-up to 24 months, 4 patients remained significantly limited with symptoms of claudication. CONCLUSIONS: A significantly higher incidence of symptoms of pelvic ischemia occurred with more distal placement of coils for IIA embolization. Failure to control for extent of coil placement may account for the apparently conflicting results in published studies. IIA coil embolization should be performed as proximal as possible to prevent interference with pelvic collateral circulation.     

动脉自膨式支架置入治疗下肢缺血

目的探讨下肢各个部位动脉腔内自膨式支架置入治疗下肢缺血的疗效。方法对2002年1月-2006年3月支架治疗65例71条患肢的临床资料进行临床回顾性研究，其中52．3％（38／71）肢体为糖尿病下肢动脉硬化，47、7％（33／71）肢体为非糖尿病下肢动脉硬化。支架部位包括腹主动脉支架2例2条患肢2枚支架，腹主动脉及髂动脉闭塞行腹主动脉和单侧髂动脉支架置入1例3枚支架，髂动脉支架33例35条患肢38枚支架，髂动脉和股浅动脉同时支架置入6例6条息肢12枚支架，股浅动脉支架置入16例19条肢体23枚支架，股浅动脉和近端胭动脉病变同时支架置入5例6条患肢10枚支架，远端胭动脉支架2例2条患肢。结果65例随访2—50个月，平均16．1月，2例腹主动脉支架、1例腹主动脉与髂动脉支架同时置入全部通畅；髂动脉支架闭塞4例4条患肢，通畅率88．6％（31／35）；股浅动脉支架闭塞4例4条患肢，通畅率为78．9％（15／19）；股浅动脉与近端胭动脉支架闭塞1例，通畅率83．3％（5／6）；远端胭动脉支架2例全部闭塞；3例小腿动脉流出道主干动脉全部闭塞的支架术后平均5．6月仍然保持通畅。结论下肢动脉腔内支架置入可作为治疗主髂动脉病变的首选方法；对于股动脉和近段胭动脉病变也可根据情况适当选用，尤其是年老体弱，无法耐受动脉旁路移植手术的患者，也可以作为首选方法；对于膝下小动脉病变应慎重使用支架。     

The surgical treatment of arterial aneurysms in Behçet disease: a report of 16 patients

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this article is to report our experience in the surgical treatment of arterial aneurysms in patients with Beh?et disease. METHODS: From October 2001 through May 2004, 18 arterial aneurysms were diagnosed in 16 Beh?et patients. All patients were male. The patients ranged in age from 24 to 52 years (mean, 37.4 +/- 5.2 years). There were six abdominal aortic, three common femoral, two iliac, two popliteal, two superficial femoral, and two anterior tibial aneurysms and one subclavian artery aneurysm. All patients but four were in remission at the time of diagnosis. Those 4 patients received immunosuppressive therapy before the surgical intervention to induce remission. After hospital discharge, all patients were followed up regularly at 3-month intervals. The mean duration of follow-up was 17 +/- 4.2 months (range, 6-24 months). RESULTS: All patients underwent a successful surgical intervention. During the study period, we performed five aortic tube graft interpositions, two aortofemoral bypasses, one aortobifemoral bypass, three common femoral artery graft interpositions, and two femoropopliteal bypasses. The popliteal artery (n = 2), anterior tibial artery (n = 2), and subclavian artery (n = 1) aneurysms were repaired primarily. There was no in-hospital mortality. One patient with an abdominal aortic aneurysm had to undergo reoperation because of postoperative bleeding. The postoperative hospital stay was 8.5 +/- 4.3 days. Two patients were lost to follow-up. During the follow-up period, two false aneurysms of the common femoral artery were repaired with a graft interposition procedure. Another patient who had undergone an aortic tube graft interposition was readmitted 9 months later with an external iliac artery aneurysm. The external iliac artery was ligated through a retroperitoneal approach, and femorofemoral bypass was performed. In addition, one femoropopliteal interposition graft was occluded, without disabling ischemia. CONCLUSIONS: Although aneurysmal disease is rare in Beh?et disease, it can complicate the clinical picture and cause life-threatening complications. We believe that the establishment of remission before the surgical intervention decreases the incidence of postoperative complications. Because recurrence at the site of anastomosis is possible, prolonged monitoring is required.     

Endovascular Aneurysm Repair or Open Surgery for Treatment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm with Involvement of Both Common Iliac Arteries ?

Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) involving the entire common iliac arteries requires proximal coil embolisation of both internal iliac arteries and extension of the stent graft into the external iliac arteries (type E according to the Eurostar classification). A potential complication of this treatment is pelvic ischemia. Therefore, this type of aneurysm is a relative contra-indication for EVAR.

In this case-report we describe a hybrid procedure preserving antegrade circulation in one of the internal iliac arteries in a patient with a type E aneurysm who was unfit for open surgery.     

Femorofemoral crossover bypass for noninfective complications of aortoiliac surgery

Between 1973 and 1989, 39 femorofemoral crossover bypasses were performed to treat unilateral noninfective complications of aortoiliac surgery. The initial revascularization procedure, performed an average of 79.5 months previously, was an aortobifemoral bypass in 29 cases, an aorto- or iliofemoral bypass in six cases, an inlay graft for abdominal aortic aneurysm and aortoiliac endarterectomy in two cases each. The indications for femorofemoral crossover bypass included prosthetic occlusion in 35 cases, thrombosed false aneurysm in two, and further degradation after endarterectomy (iliac stenosis and occlusion in one case each). There was no operative mortality. One patient with acute ischemia upon admission and another with distal gangrene required below-knee and forefoot amputations, respectively. No amputations were required during the rest of the follow-up period. Three repeat aortobifemoral bypasses were performed because of occurrence of aortic or inflow vessel lesions. Primary and secondary actuarial five year patency rates for femorofemoral crossover bypasses were 59.7% and 78.4%, respectively. Femorofemoral crossover bypass can extend the benefits derived from direct aortoiliac surgery with low mortality and morbidity in the absence of associated aortic pathology (false aneurysm at the aortic implantation site or severe obstructive lesions). kg]Key wordsPresented at the Annual Meeting of the Société de Chirurgie Vasculaire de Langue Française, May 18–19, 1990, Nancy, France.