Atrial transseptal left ventricular lead implantation for cardiac resynchronization therapy using arteriovenous loop technique

To date, several techniques for transseptal left ventricular (LV) endocardial pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) have been proposed in patients for whom routine transvenous LV pacing is infeasible. These techniques are of varying difficulty and complexity, and some requires devices not easily accessible. We herein report a simple, safe and effective approach of atrial transseptal LV lead implantation using arteriovenous loop technique in a patient for whom transvenous LV implantation lead had failed.     

Pacemaker optimization in nonresponders to cardiac resynchronization therapy: left ventricular pacing as an available option

Background: Echocardiographic (ECHO)‐guided pacemaker optimization (PMO) in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) nonresponders acutely improves left ventricular (LV) function. However, the chronic results of LV pacing in this group are less understood. Methods: We retrospectively studied 28 CRT nonresponders optimized based on ECHO to LV pacing and compared them to 28 age‐ and gender‐matched patients optimized to biventricular (BiV) pacing. ECHOs with tissue Doppler imaging assessed LV hemodynamics before, immediately after, and 29 ± 16 months after PMO. Also, 56 age‐ and gender‐matched CRT responders were included for comparison of clinical outcomes. Results: PMO resulted in acute improvements in longitudinal LV systolic function and several measures of dyssynchrony, with greater improvements in the LV paced group. Chronic improvements in ejection fraction (EF) (3.2 ± 7.7%), and left ventricle end‐systolic volume (LVESV) (?11 ± 36 mL) and one dyssynchrony measure were seen in the combined group. Chronically, both LV and BiV paced patients improved some measures of systolic function and dyssynchrony although response varied between the groups. Survival at 3.5 years was similar (P = 0.973) between the PMO (58%) and nonoptimized groups (58%) but survival free of cardiovascular hospitalization was significantly (P = 0.037) better in the nonoptimized group. Conclusions : CRT nonresponders undergoing PMO to either LV or BiV pacing have acute improvements in longitudinal systolic function and some measures of dyssynchrony. Some benefits are sustained chronically, with improvements in EF, LVESV, and dyssynchrony. A strategy of ECHO‐guided PMO results in survival for CRT nonresponders similar to that of CRT patients not referred for PMO. (PACE 2012; 35:685–694))     

Novel lead anchor technique using an active fixation quadripolar left ventricular lead in cardiac resynchronization therapy

In this report, we present a case of successful advancement of a LV lead into tortuous vessels. This was achieved by deep engagement of the coronary sinus with a cannulation catheter by applying the anchor technique using the Medtronic Attain Stability Quad lead.     

Invasive optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy: role of sequential biventricular and left ventricular pacing

BACKGROUND: Aim of this invasive study was to characterize and quantify changes in left ventricular (LV) systolic function due to sequential biventricular pacing (BV) as compared to right atrial triggered simultaneous BV (BV(0)), LV, and right ventricular (RV) pacing in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF). METHODS: In 22 CHF patients, all in sinus rhythm, temporary multisite pacing was performed prior to implantation of a permanent system. LV systolic function was evaluated invasively by the maximum rate of LV pressure increase (dP/dt(max)). Sequential BV pacing was performed with preactivation of either ventricle at 20-80 ms. RESULTS: In comparison to RV pacing, LV and BV(0) pacing increased dP/dt(max) by 33.9 +/- 19.3% and 34.0 +/- 22.6%, respectively (P < 0.001). In 9 patients, optimized sequential BV pacing further improved dP/dt(max) by 8.5 +/- 4.8% compared to BV(0) (range 3.3-17.1, P < 0.05). In 10 patients exhibiting a PR interval < or =200 ms, LV pacing was either superior (n = 6) or equal to BV(0) pacing (n = 4). In these 10 patients, LV pacing yielded a 7.4 +/- 8.0% higher dP/dt(max) than BV(0) pacing (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Using sequential BV pacing, generally with LV preactivation, moderate improvements in LV systolic function can be achieved in selected patients. Baseline PR interval may aid in the selection of the optimum cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) mode, favoring LV pacing in patients with a PR interval < or =200 ms.     

Transseptal left ventricular endocardial pacing reduces dispersion of ventricular repolarization

Background: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) may be proarrhythmic in some patients. This may be due to the effect of left ventricular (LV) epicardial pacing on ventricular repolarization. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of endocardial versus epicardial LV biventricular pacing on surface electrocardiogram (ECG) parameters that are known markers of arrhythmogenic repolarization. Methods: ECG markers of repolarization (QT dispersion, QTD; T peak to end, T_peak‐end; T_peak‐end dispersion, T_peak‐endD; QTc) were retrospectively measured before and after CRT in seven patients with transseptal LV endocardial leads (TS group), 28 matched patients with coronary sinus (CS) LV leads (CS group), and eight patients with surgical LV epicardial leads (SUR group). All ECGs were scanned and analyzed using digital callipers. Results: Compared to the CS group, the TS group CRT was associated with a significant postpacing reduction in QTD (?45.2 ± 35.6 vs ?4.3 ± 43.6 ms, P = 0.03) and T_peak‐end (?24.2 ± 22.1 vs 3.4 ± 26.7 ms, P = 0.02). There was a nonsignificant post‐CRT reduction in both T_peak‐endD (?11.3 ± 31.0 vs 2.4 ± 28.9 ms, P = 0.27) and QTc (?50.0 ± 46.4 vs 4.4 ± 70.2 ms, P = 0.06) in the TS versus the CS group. In contrast, there were no differences between the SUR and CS groups in terms of the effect of CRT on these repolarization parameters. Conclusions: CRT with (atrial transseptal) endocardial LV lead placement is associated with repolarization characteristics that are considered to be less arrhythmogenic than those generated by CS (epicardial) LV lead placement. Further work is needed to determine whether these changes translate to a reduction in proarrhythmia. (PACE 2011; 34:1258–1266)     

Performance of left ventricular versus biventricular pacing in chronic heart failure assessed by stress echocardiography

Acute hemodynamic studies suggest that resynchronization therapy using single-site left ventricular pacing (LVP) is equivalent to biventricular pacing (BIVP). The aim of this study was to assess the performance of LVP versus BIVP during exercise by means of stress echocardiography. A total of 28 patients (25 men and 3 women, mean age 60.9 +/- 8 years) with advanced chronic heart failure and impaired ventricular conduction (QRS > 150 ms) were studied. Patients were randomly allocated to either BIVP or LVP mode with a crossover on the next day and cardiac output was estimated at rest and during each stage of bicycle ergometry in supine position by means of velocity time integral formula. Maximum exercise level was comparable for both pacing modes (up to 100 W) and no significant differences were revealed either in heart rate or in blood pressure at rest and during any step of exercise. LVP was associated with significantly higher cardiac output at rest (3.2 +/- 0.5 vs 2.8 +/- 0.6 l/min, P < 0.01) and during low level exercise (4.4 +/- 0.8 vs 3.9 +/- 0.8 l/min at 25 W, P < 0.05) as compared with BIVP. There was a trend towards higher cardiac output for LVP even at higher levels of exercise. These effects were predominantly confined to patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. It is concluded that cardiac resynchronization therapy using single-site LVP results in better hemodynamic response as compared with BIVP, both at rest and during physical exercise.     

Latency during left ventricular pacing from the lateral cardiac veins: a cause of ineffectual biventricular pacing

We report three patients with cardiomyopathy and pronounced stimulus to QRS latency during left ventricular (LV) pacing from an epicardial cardiac vein. Delayed LV activation during simultaneous biventricular pacing produced an electrocardiographic pattern dominated by right ventricular stimulation. Hemodynamic parameters improved immediately after advancing LV stimulation (in one patient) or pacing the LV only (in two patients) coupled with dramatic improvement of heart failure symptoms.     

Long-term outcome of leads and patients following robotic epicardial left ventricular lead placement for cardiac resynchronization therapy

Introduction: In cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), positive clinical response and reverse remodeling have been reported using robotically assisted left ventricular (LV) epicardial lead placement. However, the long‐term performance of epicardial leads and long‐term outcome of patients who undergo CRT via robotic assistance are unknown. In addition, since the LV lead placement is more invasive than a transvenous procedure, it is important to identify patients at higher risk of complications. Methods: We evaluated 78 consecutive patients (70 ± 11 years, 50 male) who underwent robotic epicardial LV lead placement. The short‐ (<12 months) and long‐term (≥12 months) lead performance was determined through device interrogations. Mortality data were determined by contact with the patient's family and referring physicians and confirmed using the Social Security Death Index. Results: All patients had successful lead placement and were discharged in stable condition. When compared to the time of implantation, there was a significant increase in pacing threshold (1.0 ± 0.5 vs 2.14 ± 1.2; P < 0.001) and decrease in lead impedance (1010 ± 240 Ω vs 491 ± 209 Ω; P < 0.001) at short‐term follow‐up. The pacing threshold (2.3 ± 1.2 vs 2.14 ± 1.2; P = 0.30) and lead impedance (451 ± 157 Ω vs 491 ± 209 Ω; P = 0.10) remained stable during long‐term follow‐up when compared to short‐term values. At a follow‐up of 44 ± 21 months, there were 20 deaths (26%). These patients were older (77 ± 7 vs 67 ± 11 years; P = 0.001) and had a lower ejection fraction (EF) (13 ± 7% vs 18 ± 9%; P = 0.02) than surviving patients. Conclusion: Robotically implanted epicardial LV leads for CRT perform well over short‐ and long‐term follow‐up. Older patients with a very low EF are at higher risk of death. The risks and benefits of this procedure should be carefully considered in these patients. (PACE 2011; 34:235–240)     

Implantation of left ventricular leads using a telescopic catheter system

BACKGROUND: Implantation procedures for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) remain challenging with regard to coronary sinus (CS) cannulation and left ventricular (LV) lead positioning. Technologic advances in catheter design may facilitate CS cannulation and LV lead placement. AIMS: To evaluate two different telescoping dual-catheter systems, RAPIDO Guiding Catheter System (Group R) and RAPIDO ADVANCE Guiding Catheter System (Group A) (Guidant Inc., St. Paul, MN, USA), during implantation of a CRT device. METHODS: Seventy-four consecutive patients randomly received a CRT device using the R or A system. RESULTS: An LV lead was successfully implanted in 74 patients (100%). (1) Median times for CS cannulation in groups R and A were 0.3 minutes (range from 0.05 to 14 minutes) and 0.5 minutes (range from 0.05 to 9 minutes), respectively (P = NS). (2) Median times for LV lead placement were 8 minutes (range from 0.8 to 100 minutes) and 3.5 minutes (range from 0.25 to 30 minutes), respectively, for groups R and A (P = 0.032). (3) Median total fluoroscopy times were 12.33 minutes (range from 5 to 70 minutes) and 14.33 minutes (range from 6 to 53 minutes) for groups R and A, respectively (P = NS). (4) Median procedural times for CRT implantation were 80 minutes (range from 40 to 200 minutes) and 75 minutes (range from 45 to 180 minutes) (P = NS) in groups R and A, respectively. There were no major complications. CONCLUSION: CS cannulation and LV lead placement with a telescopic dual-catheter system is a safe and feasible approach that may reduce fluoroscopy and overall CRT implantation times. Our observations suggest that the RAPIDO ADVANCE System is faster than the RAPIDO System in terms of median time for LV lead positioning.     

Video-assisted thoracoscopic implantation of the left ventricular pacing lead for cardiac resynchronization therapy

Background: To study the feasibility and efficacy of video-assisted thoracoscopic (VAT) placement of the left ventricular pacing lead for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) where the conventional transvenous coronary sinus approach has failed.
Methods: Seventeen patients underwent the VAT procedure. Indications for CRT were ischemic cardiomyopathy in six patients and nonischemic cardiomyopathy in 11. The procedure was performed under general anesthesia with single-lung ventilation. Three 2-cm incisions were used on the left chest wall to place the screw-in lead near the obtuse marginal arteries high on the lateral wall of the left ventricle (LV).
Results: The VATS approach was successful in 13/17 (76%) patients. Median procedure time was 75 minutes (range 55–135). A learning curve was observed that appeared to plateau at 75 minutes procedure time after four cases. Median length of hospital stay was 2 days (range 2–8) with one patient requiring intensive care. Satisfactory thresholds and impedances of 2.3 ± 0.9 V/0.5 ms and 560 ohms, respectively, were achieved at mean follow-up of 226 days. All patients reported symptomatic benefit with reduction in New York Heart Association score from III preoperatively to II postoperatively.
Conclusions: VAT placement of the epicardial pacing lead is feasible, safe, and efficacious. It should be considered in cases where the transvenous route has failed or as an alternative in prolonged or hazardous transvenous procedures.     

Cardiac resynchronisation therapy for heart failure

Cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) reduces symptoms and improves left ventricular function in chronic heart failure (CHF) patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction and prolonged QRS duration. Recent studies have demonstrated a reduction in mortality associated with CRT. When combined with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) reduction in mortality is likely to reduce further. Cardiac resynchronisation therapy is well tolerated and free from compliance issues and therefore should be considered for all suitable patients. Identifying patients who will derive maximum benefit requires further study and has health economic implications. We review here the CRT trial evidence as well as the implantation technique and complications. We also describe a case report where an intra-aortic balloon pump was used successfully as a bridge to CRT to treat a patient with end-stage heart failure.     

Cardiac resynchronization therapy: gender related differences in left ventricular reverse remodeling

AIM: Gender related differences in epidemiology, treatment, and prognosis of heart failure (HF) have been reported. We examined the sex influence in patients treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). METHODS AND RESULTS: Out of 334 consecutive HF patients (19.7% women) who underwent CRT, 195 patients reached clinical and echocardiographic evaluation at six and 12 months and were selected for analysis. A reduction in left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic volume/m(2) (EDVi) and end systolic volume/m(2) (ESVi) was evident in the overall population at six months (P < 0.001) and from six to 12 months (P < 0.001). Compared to men, women showed significantly greater changes in LV volumes at mid (P < 0.05) and long-term (P < 0.001) follow-up and a significantly higher LV ejection fraction (EF) (40.8 +/- 12.3 vs 34.1 +/- 10.1, P < 0.01) at one year. Multiple regression analysis, including several demographic and clinical parameters, revealed that female gender is independently associated with greater reduction in LV ESVi. At the 12-month follow-up, the proportion of responders (defined in terms of ESV reduction by at least 10%) was higher in women than in men (76.1% vs 59.3%, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: CRT induced a gender specific LV remodeling response.     

Long-term follow-up of left ventricular pacing via a posterior cardiac vein after mechanical tricuspid valve replacement

Permanent cardiac pacing was recommended in a 66-year-old woman with mechanical prosthetic mitral and tricuspid valves. To avoid a thoracotomy, a conventional endocardial lead was inserted with a steerable stylet (Locator) into the posterior cardiac vein via the right cephalic vein. Four weeks later, lead dislodgement required reoperation. The lead position remained stable up to 29 months.     

Robotically enhanced placement of left ventricular epicardial electrodes during implantation of a biventricular implantable cardioverter defibrillator system

Biventricular pacing has gained increasing acceptance in advanced heart failure patients. One major limitation of this therapy is positioning the left ventricular stimulation lead via the coronary sinus. This report demonstrates the feasibility of totally endoscopic direct placement of an epicardial stimulation lead on the left ventricle using the daVinci surgical system.     

Long-Term Experience with a Preshaped Left Ventricular Pacing Lead

OLLITRAULT, J., et al. : Long-Term Experience with a Preshaped Left Ventricular Pacing Lead. This study describes a long-term experience with a new LV pacing lead. The study population consisted of 62 patients (85% men,   71 ± 10   years old) with advanced dilated cardiomyopathy, in NYHA Class III or IV despite optimal drug therapy, and a QRS duration >150 ms. Patients in sinus rhythm were implanted with a triple chamber pacemaker to maintain atrioventricular synchrony. A dual chamber pacemaker was implanted in patients in atrial fibrillation for biventricular pacing only. A clinical evaluation and interrogation of the resynchronization pacemaker were performed at implant, at 1 week (W1), one (M1), four (M4), and seven (M7) months after implantation. A longer follow-up (2 years) is available for patients implanted at the authors institution. LV measurements were pacing threshold at 0.5-ms pulse duration and pacing impedance. R wave amplitude (mV) was measured at the time of implantation only. The system was successfully implanted in 86% of patients with the latest design of the lead. Mean R wave amplitude at implant was   15 ± 7 mV   and mean pacing impedance was   1054 ± 254 Ω   . Between implant   (n = 38)   and M7   (n = 15)   , pacing threshold rose from   0.73 ± 0.54   to   1.57 ± 0.60 V (P < 0.001)   . In conclusion, the situs lead was successfully implanted in a high percentage of patients. In addition, low pacing threshold and high impedance measured during follow-up are consistent with a low pacing current drain, ensuring a durable pulse generator longevity. (PACE 2003; 26[Pt. II]:185–188)     

Simple access to the coronary venous system for left ventricular pacing

Implantation of the LV lead for biventricular pacing can be challenging, time consuming, and often requires extensive fluoroscopy time. A conventional diagnostic 5 Fr left Amplatz catheter was used to cannulate the coronary sinus in 15 consecutive patients undergoing implantation of a biventricular pacemaker. When the coronary sinus was cannulated, the proximal end of the Amplatz catheter was cut and the coronary sinus sheath was passed over the Amplatz catheter that was then removed. Coronary sinus cannulation was achieved in all 15 patients with a mean fluoroscopy time of 3.34 +/- 1.9 minutes. Subsequent implantation of a biventricular pacemaker was successful and free of complications in all the 15 patients.