Acne and social media: A cross‐sectional study of content quality on TikTok

Our objective was to assess the quality of acne‐related medical information present on TikTok, the world's fastest growing social media platform. We queried the TikTok mobile application for videos tagged with “#acne” on May 1, 2020, and assessed the top 100 videos meeting inclusion criteria for content quality using DISCERN, a validated and reliable instrument for evaluating consumer health information. The mean content quality rating of videos was 2.03 (SD 0.47) which, according to the DISCERN instrument, indicates information with serious to potentially important shortcomings. Dermatologists should be aware that adolescents are using TikTok to gather acne‐related information, and should prioritize acne education in this patient demographic due to the generally low content quality of such information.     

Patient perception of beauty on social media: Professional and bioethical obligations in esthetics

Recently, social media use has skyrocketed, especially with millennials. The use of filtered images and photo editing has led to a new trend of social media‐induced dissatisfaction with appearance, termed “snapchat dysmorphia” and “selfie dysmorphia”. It is important for practitioners to recognize and understand this trend in addition to knowing how to manage these patients. As clinicians, we have bioethical and professional obligations to educate ourselves on new and relevant trends, ensure adequate patient safety, and advocate for continued consumer education.     

The Grading of Recommendations,assessment, development,and evaluation approach was rarely followed and inconsistently applied in pressure injury prevention guidelines development: A cross-sectional survey

IntroductionThe Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was developed to assess the certainty (or quality) of evidence and strength of recommendations in guidelines and endorsed internationally as a standard. Some guidelines had been developed to promote pressure injury prevention.AimsWe explored whether and to what extent the development of pressure injury prevention guidelines had followed or been informed by the GRADE approach. If this approach was not used, we examined which other methods were used instead.MethodsA cross-sectional study of pressure injury prevention guidelines was conducted. PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Chinese databases as well as guideline repositories and websites of professional bodies were searched for guidelines from 1990 to 2020. The grading systems of the certainty (or quality) of evidence and strength of recommendations of included guidelines were extracted. For the GRADE approach guidelines, compliance was assessed with the GRADE application criteria.ResultsTwenty guidelines were identified. Among them, four guidelines (20%) indicated the use of the GRADE approach. The compliance rate ranged from 33.3%–94.4%. Other approaches, such as the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) approach, were also used.ConclusionThe GRADE approach is rarely followed and inconsistently applied in pressure injury prevention guidelines. Other systems, such as the SIGN approach, are being used despite being outdated or inconsistent. Strategies for further uptake and appropriate application of the GRADE approach among guideline developers are needed in the future.     

The impact of rosacea on quality of life: effects of demographic and clinical characteristics and various treatment modalities

Summary Background Rosacea has a major psychosocial impact on a patient’s life. Objectives To determine the impact of rosacea on patient quality of life, the relationship of quality of life scores to clinical and demographic variables, and the change in quality of life following various treatments. Methods Patients’ demographic and clinical characteristics were recorded at their initial examination and their response to treatment and side‐effects were recorded additionally at their follow‐up examination. Rosacea severity was scored for each of four signs from 0 to 3. Patients were requested to complete Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) questionnaires. Results A total of 308 patients took part in this study. Mean ± SD DLQI total score at the initial visit was 6·93 ± 5·18 and was related to patients’ age, sex, age at disease onset, subjective symptoms, triggering factors, previous treatments, rosacea severity scores and patients’ self‐assessment of ease of living with rosacea. Of these 308 patients, 164 completed the DLQI following treatment. Mean ± SD post‐treatment DLQI score was 4·36 ± 4·82. Post‐treatment scores were also related to sex, type of treatment modality, development of side‐effects, improvement of rosacea, rosacea severity scores and patients’ self‐reported ease of living with rosacea. Topical metronidazole, oral tetracycline and oral isotretinoin were observed to reduce signs and symptoms of rosacea and DLQI scores significantly at this repeat examination. Conclusions Rosacea affects patients’ lives to a moderate extent, and this can be assessed by using DLQI. DLQI is also sensitive to quality of life changes brought about by treatment of rosacea. As a preliminary result we can say that topical metronidazole, oral tetracycline and oral isotretinoin seem to improve quality of life of patients by improving lesions of rosacea more efficiently than other therapeutic agents.