Taxane/anthracycline combinations: setting a new standard in breast cancer?

Among the novel chemotherapeutic drugs introduced in the 1990s, the taxanes have emerged as the most powerful compounds in breast cancer. Both compounds, paclitaxel and docetaxel, have been evaluated in metastatic settings before adjuvant trials proceeded. Docetaxel was shown in several phase III trials to be superior, particularly in terms of survival, for salvaging polychemotherapies after failure of prior chemotherapy, including that with anthracyclines. A benefit of docetaxel was also reported when compared with doxorubicin after failure of alkylating agents. In phase III trials paclitaxel was reported to be as efficacious over 24 hours as doxorubicin 60 mg/m(2), while paclitaxel was significantly inferior to doxorubicin 75 mg/m(2) over 3 hours and was close to CMF in another trial. The role of taxanes in combination with anthracyclines in first-line therapy of advanced breast cancer is emerging. Following several phase II studies, a phase III trial showed the significant superiority of docetaxel/doxorubicin (AT) versus doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (AC) in terms of response and time to progression. In several phase II studies with paclitaxel (3 hours), anthracyclines in the metastatic setting showed high efficacy but produced cardiac toxicity related to a pharmacokinetic interaction between the two agents. This finding led to the implementation of metastatic strategies (phase III trials) aimed at avoiding the pharmacokinetic interaction, while the adjuvant strategies with paclitaxel focused primarily on the sequential approach (AC followed by paclitaxel). In contrast, adjuvant strategies with docetaxel/anthracycline-based programs were implemented following both sequential and combination approaches.     

Advances in the use of taxanes in the adjuvant therapy of breast cancer

Among the novel chemotherapeutic drugs introduced in the 1990s, the taxanes have emerged as the most powerful compounds in breast cancer. Paclitaxel and docetaxel have been evaluated in the metastatic setting before proceeding with adjuvant trials. The adjuvant strategies of development of both taxanes have been different, mostly as a result of pharmacokinetic differences and dose-schedule issues. As a consequence, paclitaxel was studied nearly exclusively in sequential programs such as AC (doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide) followed by paclitaxel or doxorubicin, followed by paclitaxel, followed by cyclophosphamide. In contrast, docetaxel has been investigated in sequence (AC followed by docetaxel) and in combination chemotherapy (doxorubicin/docetaxel and docetaxel/doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide). Available results of large-scale phase III trials confirm that the taxanes have the potential to change the natural history of early-stage breast cancer. It is becoming clear that sequential chemotherapy and polychemotherapy approaches with taxanes are to be considered in the treatment of patients with node-positive breast cancer. Further results are eagerly awaited to fully understand the role of taxanes and to optimize their impact on early-stage breast cancer. It is our opinion that the real pending issue is no longer whether taxanes will make a difference in the adjuvant setting (the answer is most likely yes), but the definition of their optimal strategic use for maximum patient benefit.     

Ongoing US cooperative group trials using taxanes in the adjuvant setting

The use of systemic adjuvant therapy in women with early-stage breast cancer has been demonstrated to have a profound impact on survival. The role of paclitaxel and docetaxel in the adjuvant setting has attracted a great deal of attention. Both of these agents are highly active in patients with advanced breast cancer. In addition, they can be utilized in combination with anthracyclines, which have been shown to provide a slightly better outcome in patients with early-stage breast cancer compared to non-anthracycline-containing regimens. Randomized trials have demonstrated a potential role for paclitaxel in adjuvant chemotherapy. In the Cancer and Leukemia Group B 9344 trial, which explored the use of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide with or without paclitaxel, the initial analysis demonstrated a 22% reduction in the relative risk of relapse and a 26% reduction in the relative risk of death in the paclitaxel group. However, a clear role for the use of paclitaxel in adjuvant therapy remains to be defined. The Breast Cancer International Research Group trial 001 compared the combination of docetaxel/doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide to 5-fluorouracil/doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide. This trial demonstrated a promising reduction in the relative risk of recurrence of 32% for the docetaxel/doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide group. Ongoing trials will help to further define the role of taxanes in the adjuvant setting for patients with operable breast cancer.     

Adjuvant therapy approaches to breast cancer: Should taxanes be incorporated?

The triplet of docetaxel, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (TAC) has emerged as an alternative chemotherapy regimen for adjuvant management of node-positive breast cancer. Based on recently reported 3-year data from the Breast Cancer International Research Group (BCIRG) 001, disease-free survival was significantly higher in patients who underwent adjuvant chemotherapy with TAC rather than the established regimen of 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FAC). TAC reduced the risk of disease recurrence in estrogen receptor-positive and -negative patients. Whereas overall survival was not significantly different between the two groups, TAC led to a significant reduction in mortality in the subset of patients with one to three involved axillary lymph nodes. Overall, these interim BCIRG 001 results, coupled with those from Cancer and Leukemia Group B-9344 and National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) B-28 (phase III trials of sequential adjuvant chemotherapy with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel), suggest that taxanes are a valuable component of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with node-positive breast cancer, including those with estrogen receptor positivity and/or extensive lymph node involvement. Accumulating data in the neoadjuvant setting lend further support to the view that the taxanes confer clinically meaningful benefits in the management of early-stage breast cancer. Such ongoing studies as NSABP B-30 will be instrumental in establishing the relative merits of sequential versus concurrent taxane-anthracycline adjuvant regimens for patients with node-positive breast cancer.     

Capecitabine: expanding options for the treatment of patients with early or locally advanced breast cancer

Capecitabine has proven efficacy in metastatic breast cancer, extending survival in combination with docetaxel and offering a favorable safety profile, including minimal myelosuppression and alopecia, as a single agent. It is therefore logical that capecitabine could build on the improved outcomes achieved with taxanes in early breast cancer. In the neoadjuvant setting, a phase III trial of capecitabine and docetaxel (XT) versus doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) showed that XT was more effective than AC in terms of clinical response rate and pathologic complete response rate, with a manageable safety profile. Other studies, including a phase III trial of capecitabine, epirubicin, and docetaxel, a phase III trial of capecitabine and vinorelbine, and several phase II studies of different regimens with capecitabine, have confirmed the high activity of neoadjuvant capecitabine, with acceptable safety. In the adjuvant setting, a Finnish phase III study (FinXX) of sequential XT followed by cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and capecitabine versus docetaxel followed by 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide has shown favorable safety with lower doses of both capecitabine and docetaxel in the XT combination. Efficacy results from that trial are eagerly awaited. A large, ongoing trial program is continuing to explore the potential for capecitabine in the treatment of early breast cancer, looking at capecitabine-taxane combinations, capecitabine maintenance therapy, capecitabine for elderly patients, and sequential versus combination therapy, involving >20,000 patients.     

Overview of epirubicin-based adjuvant therapy in breast cancer

Clinical trial data indicate that epirubicin-based adjuvant treatment of breast cancer is associated with marked improvement in relapse-free and overall survival compared with traditional cyclophosphamide/methotrexate/5-fluorouracil. The outcomes are comparable to those achieved with sequential use of doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide and paclitaxel. Dose intensification of epirubicin is feasible, with tolerable side effects and no increased risk of cardiotoxicity beyond that expected. Clinical trial data coupled with pharmacokinetic evidence provide a strong foundation and rationale for current and future investigation of epirubicin in combination with the taxanes in the adjuvant setting. An ongoing German study is evaluating epirubicin/cyclophosphamide in combination with trastuzumab as first-line therapy of metastatic breast cancer in patients whose tumors overexpress HER2/neu protein. These results, particularly the tolerability of this regimen, will form the basis for future adjuvant and neoadjuvant studies of epirubicin/trastuzumab-based regimens.     

Postmenopausal Metastatic Breast Cancer

Endocrine therapy and chemotherapy play important roles in the management of postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer. This paper specifically reviews the indications and options for first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer and recent advances are highlighted, with particular attention to randomized, controlled, phase III clinical trials. Until recently, tamoxifen was standard first-line endocrine treatment for patients with metastatic breast cancer. Now, potent third generation aromatase inhibitors, such as letrozole and anastrozole, have shown superiority to tamoxifen as first-line endocrine treatment and provide an alternative for postmenopausal women. The most active chemotherapy agents for patients with advanced breast cancer have, until recently, been the anthracyclines, doxorubicin and epirubicin. However, their increasing use in the adjuvant setting has resulted in a need for novel active non-cross-resistant cytotoxic drugs for metastatic breast cancer. Real progress has been made with the introduction of the taxanes, paclitaxel and docetaxel. Other developments include the use of single agent cytotoxics such as vinorelbine, the oral fluoropyrimidine capecitabine and gemcitabine, all of which have some activity following either taxanes or anthracyclines, along with a low toxicity profile. Bisphosphonates are bone-specific palliative treatments that have been instituted on the basis of their impact on symptoms and skeletal related morbidity. Finally, the era of biological therapy in the clinic for patients with breast cancer has been heralded with the development and introduction of trastuzumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody which targets the cell surface growth factor receptor HER2/neu. Importantly, each of these new treatment options has provided an incremental improvement in efficacy over previous standard first-line therapies.     

Management of HER-2/neu-positive metastatic breast cancer

We reviewed therapies for the management of HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer. HER2-overexpressing breast cancers have a distinctive molecular signal and distinctive clinical characteristics. They are associated with an adverse prognosis, relative resistance to certain types of therapies (i.e. tamoxifen), and responsiveness to anthracyclines and taxanes. Anti-HER2 therapies such as trastuzumab and lapatinib have revolutionised the treatment of breast cancer and can dramatically improve outcomes in women with HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer. Response to these targeted agents is improved when used in combination with cytotoxic agents such as anthracyclines and taxanes. However, there is an approximate 13% (taxanes) to 27% (conventional anthracyclines) risk of cardiotoxicity with these combinations. The novel anthracycline, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, shows efficacy similar to that of conventional doxorubicin and may offer significantly less cardiotoxicity; this should be confirmed in phase III clinical trials. Lapatinib is an oral small molecule targeting HER2 with promising antitumour activity in the metastatic setting and a potential for reduced cardiotoxicity as compared with trastuzumab. Neoadjuvant as well adjuvant trials involving lapatinib, trastuzumab or their combination have started recrutiment worldwide.     

Combination of taxanes and anthracyclines in first-line chemotherapy of metastatic breast cancer: an interim report

Anthracyclines and taxanes are among the most effective agents in the treatment of advanced breast cancer, refractory or non-responsive to endocrine manipulation. Several recently published phase III studies have addressed the role of these compounds in combination compared with established chemotherapy regimens. This report considering a total of 4244 patients evaluates the data of those trials with respect to the efficacy and toxicity of the treatment regimens. Currently, evidence is growing that especially patients with symptomatic visceral tumour spread may benefit from the combined application of anthracyclines and taxanes. Adequately dosed polychemotherapy appears to be more successful than monotherapy, and, at present, the combination of anthracyclines (doxorubicin, epirubicin) and taxanes (docetaxel (Doc), paclitaxel (Pac)) might lead to a promising approach to improve the course of the metastatic disease.     

Rationale and use of epirubicin-based therapy in the adjuvant setting

The taxanes paclitaxel and docetaxel have an important role in the treatment of breast cancer, and numerous randomized trials have evaluated their efficacy for this indication. A systematic, evidence-based review was performed, which included all randomized, controlled trials evaluating taxanes for the treatment of early- or advanced-stage breast cancer that were identified in CANCERLIT and MEDLINE searches. The primary objectives of this review were to determine the dose and schedule for each taxane that was associated with the most favorable therapeutic index, and to determine whether (and under what circumstances) the taxanes improved survival. The search revealed 18 randomized phase II (n=1) or phase III (n=17) trials. For metastatic breast cancer, the dose and schedule associated with the most favorable therapeutic index for paclitaxel was 175 mg/m2 given as a 3-hour infusion every 3 weeks, and docetaxel was 60-100 mg/m2 given as a 1-hour infusion every 3 weeks. Survival was improved under the following circumstances: (1) when 4 cycles of paclitaxel (175 mg/m2 every 3 weeks) was given following 4 cycles of conventional doxorubicin- cyclophosphamide for axillary node-positive operable breast cancer, (2) when trastuzumab was added to paclitaxel as first-line therapy for metastatic breast cancer that overexpressed HER2/neu, and (3) when docetaxel was given as second-line therapy for anthracycline-resistant disease. Although a survival benefit was found for taxanes as a component of first-line therapy in two of six trials, the interpretation of both positive trials was confounded by a lack of crossover to taxane therapy in those who were initially randomized to receive standard therapy. The taxanes improve survival in patients with early-stage breast cancer and selected patients with metastatic breast cancer. Further research is necessary in order to identify the efficacy of docetaxel relative to paclitaxel, the optimal dose of docetaxel, the role of weekly taxane therapy, the role of trastuzumab plus taxanes in early-stage disease, and whether taxanes are more effective when given concomitantly or sequentially in patients with early-stage disease     

Drug treatments for adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: recent trials and future directions

Adjuvant chemotherapy with anthracycline-based regimens has been proven to decrease the risk of relapse and cancer-related mortality in women with early-stage breast cancer. The taxanes, paclitaxel and docetaxel, have been incorporated into several adjuvant chemotherapy regimens in recent studies. Some of these trials have matured and demonstrated a definitive benefit with the use of taxanes. The available studies reveal that the addition of a taxane after an anthracycline or the substitution of a taxane into a three-drug regimen, such as docetaxel, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide, clearly demonstrate a benefit for taxanes in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer. The toxicities of the taxanes are generally acceptable. Targeted therapy, such as with trastuzumab, has demonstrated a large benefit that previously has never been seen in adjuvant chemotherapy trials, and thus, should now be part of the standard in the treatment of HER-2/neu positive breast cancer. Newer agents are on the horizon.     

Neoadjuvant gemcitabine therapy for breast cancer

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has become a standard treatment in the management of locally advanced breast cancer. Patients with earlier-stage disease may also benefit from neoadjuvant treatment in terms of improved rates of breast-conserving surgery and thus better quality of life. Gemcitabine is a pyrimidine analogue that has shown activity in a variety of solid tumors, a good toxicity profile, and nonoverlapping toxicity with other chemotherapeutic agents. Several phase II/III studies are assessing gemcitabine combined with anthracyclines, taxanes, and/or vinorelbine both in the neoadjuvant and metastatic disease settings. This article reviews developments in neoadjuvant use of gemcitabine in combination with anthracyclines and taxanes. Several phase II trials of gemcitabine combined with doxorubicin/epirubicin or with doxorubicin/paclitaxel have been carried out. Preliminary findings demonstrate increased complete response rates and good tolerability of these regimens in patients with breast cancer.     

Rationale and design of a phase III trial of adjuvant sequential epirubicin/ cyclophosphamide and taxane versus concurrent epirubicin/taxane in operable node-positive breast cancer

The sequential use of a doxorubicin combination followed by paclitaxel has been reported to improve disease-free and overall survival in patients with node-positive breast cancer beyond that obtained with doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide combinations. Epirubicin is associated with less cardiotoxicity than doxorubicin and can be used at cumulative dose levels or intensities that cannot be safely achieved with doxorubicin. Epirubicin/taxane combinations have exhibited significant activity when used in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Based on these safety and efficacy data, a phase III adjuvant trial will compare the efficacy of a concurrent epirubicin/taxane regimen with sequential epirubicin/cyclophosphamide followed by taxane treatment in patients with operable node-positive breast cancer.     

Chemotherapy of metastatic breast cancer: what to expect in 2001 and beyond

Chemotherapy plays an important role in the management of metastatic breast cancer. The anthracyclines (doxorubicin, epirubicin) and the taxanes (paclitaxel, docetaxel) are considered the most active agents for patients with advanced breast cancer. Traditionally, the anthracyclines have been used in combination with cyclophosphamide and 5-fluorouracil (FAC, FEC). The taxanes have single-agent activity similar to older combination chemotherapy treatments. There is great interest in developing anthracycline/taxane combinations. Capecitabine is indicated for patients who progress after anthracycline and taxane therapy. Vinorelbine and gemcitabine have activity in patients with metastatic breast cancer and are commonly used as third- and fourth-line palliative therapy. The role of high-dose chemotherapy is not well-defined and remains experimental. Novel cytotoxic therapy strategies include the development of anthracycline, taxane, and oral fluoropyrimidine analogues; antifolates; topoisomerase I inhibitors, and multidrug resistance inhibitors. A better understanding of the biology of breast cancer is providing novel treatment approaches. Oncogenes and tumor-supressor genes are emerging as important targets for therapy. Trastuzumab, a monoclonal antibody directed against the Her-2/neu protein, has been shown to prolong survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Other novel biologic therapies interfere with signal transduction pathways and angiogenesis. The challenge for the next decade will be to integrate these promising agents in the management of metastatic and primary breast cancer.     

Future treatment options with capecitabine in solid tumours

The oral fluoropyrimidine, capecitabine is attracting great interest in the context of tumour-selective therapy and rationally designed combination regimens. Agents such as taxanes upregulate thymidine phosphorylase (TP), and there is therefore a clear rationale for their combination with capecitabine. Preclinical studies of capecitabine/taxane combination therapy demonstrated synergistic antitumour activity and phase I studies showed encouraging efficacy. Therefore, a randomised, phase III trial (docetaxel versus docetaxel/capecitabine) has been initiated in anthracycline-refractory metastatic breast cancer patients. Recruitment is complete. In colorectal cancer, capecitabine/oxaliplatin combination therapy is promising and a phase I, dose-finding trial has been conducted in patients with refractory metastatic solid tumours. A similar trial has evaluated capecitabine/irinotecan combination treatment. Capecitabine is also being investigated as adjuvant therapy for colorectal and breast cancers. The primary objective of the ongoing X-ACT trial in almost 2000 Dukes' C colon cancer patients is to demonstrate at least equivalent disease-free survival between capecitabine and the Mayo Clinic regimen. In addition, the CALGB is planning a randomised, phase III trial of capecitabine versus doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide or cyclophosphamide/methotrexate/5-fluorouracil (CMF) as adjuvant treatment in high-risk, node-negative breast cancer patients aged >65 years.     

Preclinical pharmacology of the taxanes: implications of the differences

Taxanes are one of the most powerful classes of compounds among all chemotherapeutic drugs. Only 30 years separate the isolation of the first taxane from the results of direct clinical comparisons in metastatic breast, ovarian, and lung cancer between the two taxanes available in routine clinical practice. These results suggest a more favorable benefit-to-risk ratio for docetaxel compared to paclitaxel when these drugs are used as single agents or in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents in an every-3-week dosing regimen. Pharmacological data support the difference between the taxanes, likely explaining the clinical results. Considering the molecular pharmacology of the two drugs, docetaxel appears to bind to beta-tubulin with greater affinity and has a wider cell cycle activity than paclitaxel. Docetaxel also appears to have direct antitumoral activity via an apoptotic effect mediated by bcl-2 phosphorylation. In addition, docetaxel has a longer retention time in tumor cells than paclitaxel because of greater uptake and slower efflux. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the taxanes show both agents to be extensively metabolized in the liver, and paclitaxel has a nonlinear pharmacokinetic behavior while docetaxel has linear pharmacokinetics. These differences explain the more simple treatment schedule and favorable results for docetaxel as a single agent and in combination therapy. Last, but not least, there is a pharmacokinetic interaction between paclitaxel and the anthracyclines, an active class of compounds commonly used in the treatment of breast cancer. This pharmacokinetic interaction is associated with greater cardio- and myelotoxicities, which are sequence dependent. These pharmacological data likely explain the different clinical development strategies for the two molecules as well as the different clinical results from individual trials and direct comparisons.     

Adjuvant use of taxanes for patients with breast cancer: we see the tip of the iceberg

Advances in screening techniques for breast cancer have led to the diagnosis of more patients at earlier disease stages at which time the possibility of a cure is more likely. Adjuvant chemotherapy with anthracycline-based regimens has proven to reduce the risk of relapse and cancer-related death in women with early-stage breast cancer. Recent studies have aimed at integrating the taxanes, paclitaxel and docetaxel, into the adjuvant setting, but to date, we are still in the earliest stages of the study of patients with operable breast cancer. Adjuvant trials now require thousands of patients and many years to reach maturity. Many of the trials began in the late 1990s and are not yet mature. For node-positive patients, the available evidence supports the use of taxanes as adjuvant treatment since they are safe and appear to provide benefit. Going forward, docetaxel holds significant promise in the adjuvant setting, and further trials as well as further follow-up of existing trials are eagerly awaited to help us determine whether docetaxel is best given sequentially to, or concurrently with, doxorubicin or epirubicin.     

Taxanes for breast cancer: an evidence-based review of randomized phase II and phase III trials

The taxanes paclitaxel and docetaxel have an important role in the treatment of breast cancer, and numerous randomized trials have evaluated their efficacy for this indication. A systematic, evidence-based review was performed, which included all randomized, controlled trials evaluating taxanes for the treatment of early-or advanced-stage breast cancer that were identified in CANCERLIT and MEDLINE searches. The primary objectives of this review were to determine the dose and schedule for each taxane that was associated with the most favorable therapeutic index, and to determine whether (and under what circumstances) the taxanes improved survival. The search revealed 18 randomized phase II (n = 1) or phase III (n = 17) trials. For metastatic breast cancer, the dose and schedule associated with the most favorable therapeutic index for paclitaxel was 175 mg/m2 given as a 3-hour infusion every 3 weeks, and docetaxel was 60-100 mg/m2 given as a 1-hour infusion every 3 weeks. Survival was improved under the following circumstances: (1) when 4 cycles of paclitaxel (175 mg/m2 every 3 weeks) was given following 4 cycles of conventional doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide for axillary node-positive operable breast cancer, (2) when trastuzumab was added to paclitaxel as first-line therapy for metastatic breast cancer that overexpressed HER2/neu, and (3) when docetaxel was given as second-line therapy for anthracycline-resistant disease. Although a survival benefit was found for taxanes as a component of first-line therapy in two of six trials, the interpretation of both positive trials was confounded by a lack of crossover to taxane therapy in those who were initially randomized to receive standard therapy. The taxanes improve survival in patients with early-stage breast cancer and selected patients with metastatic breast cancer. Further research is necessary in order to identify the efficacy of docetaxel relative to paclitaxel, the optimal dose of docetaxel, the role of weekly taxane therapy, the role of trastuzumab plus taxanes in early-stage disease, and whether taxanes are more effective when given concomitantly or sequentially in patients with early-stage disease.     

A phase II study of sequential docetaxel followed by doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer

This phase II study assessed the activity and toxicity profile of the sequential administration of 3 cycles of docetaxel (100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks) followed by 3 cycles of AC (doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide; 60/600 mg/m2 every 3 weeks) as first-line chemotherapy in 30 patients with metastatic breast cancer. The response rate was 60% after docetaxel and 73% after AC. This reflected an increase in the rate of complete response (from 7% after docetaxel to 17% after AC). The median duration of response was 10.5 months, and the median time to progression was 12.6 months. The median survival time had not been reached after a median follow-up of 23.2 months. The sequential treatment was generally well tolerated, with grade 3/4 neutropenia found in 20% and 14% of patients treated with docetaxel and AC, respectively. No cumulative myelosuppression was detected. The incidence of grade 3/4 nonhematologic toxicities was low. The sequential administration of docetaxel followed by AC showed a high antitumor activity and a good safety profile. The hematologic toxicity found is markedly lower than that found using concomitant chemotherapy with the same drugs. Our results support the design of phase III trials that directly compare a sequential schedule with a concomitant schedule of docetaxel plus AC (or with doxorubicin only), focusing on the toxicity profile.     

Taxanes in the treatment of early breast cancer

The taxanes docetaxel and paclitaxel have established roles as two of the most active agents in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. These two drugs are now being incorporated into the management of early breast cancer. A first generation of trials has explored whether the addition of taxanes either sequentially or in combination with adjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy improves outcome for patients with early breast cancer. A second generation of trials are now underway which are based on the assumption that taxanes are beneficial in the adjuvant setting, and are comparing the different taxanes, dosing regimens and the addition of further agents. Trials in the neoadjuvant setting have recently demonstrated improved response rates with the addition of taxanes into existing anthracycline-based regimes. This review critically appraises these trials and provides an overview of ongoing research in the area.