The role of aromatase inactivators in the treatment of breast cancer

 Third-generation aromatase inhibitors and inactivators have earned their place in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. The third-generation aromatase inactivator exemestane was found to be superior to megestrol acetate as second-line endocrine therapy in postmenopausal women, with respect to time to progression as well as overall survival, and the results from an ongoing study comparing exemestane with tamoxifen in first-line treatment are promising. The finding that exemestane may also work in patients previously exposed to nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors reveals lack of complete cross-resistance between the compounds. Currently, exemestane given as monotherapy, or in sequence with tamoxifen (2-3 + 3-2 years of tamoxifen-exemestane or 5 years of tamoxifen followed by 2 years of exemestane) is being compared with tamoxifen 5 years monotherapy in the adjuvant setting. In addition, we are currently addressing the toxicity of exemestane in a placebo-controlled trial in low-risk breast-cancer patients. The results from these studies will outline the potential role of exemestane in adjuvant treatment and, potentially, for breast-cancer prevention in postmenopausal women. Received: April 1, 2002     

Applicability of the intratumor aromatase preclinical model to predict clinical trial results with endocrine therapy

Preclinical models and clinical studies have shown that aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are powerful inhibitors of estrogen synthesis and significantly suppress estrogen in vivo. For more than 20 years, standard first-line treatment for postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer has been the antiestrogen tamoxifen, a selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) with differential effects on breast, endometrial, bone, and vascular tissues. The estrogenic activity of tamoxifen is associated with deleterious clinical side effects, including vaginal bleeding, endometrial cancer, and thromboembolism. AIs are established second-line treatments in patients who progress with tamoxifen. Compared with progestins, such as megestrol acetate, or the earlier AIs aminoglutethimide and fadrozole, the new AIs, including exemestane, anastrozole, and letrozole, have increased efficacy and clinical benefit and cause fewer side effects in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Letrozole and anastrozole are approved first-line therapy for patients with metastatic breast cancer and as second-line treatment after tamoxifen failure. Studies in the intratumoral aromatase xenograft preclinical model have shown better responses with AIs than with antiestrogens in first-line therapy, and these data are consistent with the results from clinical trials. This model is now being used to assess whether combined or sequential administration of AIs with other agents may provide additional benefit.     

Exemestane: a novel aromatase inactivator for breast cancer

Exemestane is a unique inactivator of the aromatase enzyme and differs from the two approved aromatase inhibitors. It is well absorbed at a daily oral dose of 25 mg and produces significant suppression of aromatase and plasma estrogen levels without androgenic side effects. Toxicity is mild with menopausal symptoms predominating. Exemestane is approved for the treatment of postmenopausal women with recurrent breast cancer. In reported clinical trials, exemestane was effective in patients failing tamoxifen, megestrol acetate, or even other aromatase inhibitors in phase II trials and was superior to megestrol acetate in a phase III randomized trial in which an early survival advantage for exemestane was observed. Studies evaluating first-line exemestane for adjuvant use and as a chemopreventive agent are underway.     

Aromatase inhibitors for treatment of postmenopausal patients with breast cancer

The third generation of aromatase inhibitors and inactivators, such as anastrozole (Arimidex), letrozole (Femara) and exemestane (Aromasin), have become available for treatment of postmenopausal breast cancer patients. Several clinical trials have demonstrated that these new drugs can achieve better treatment results than megestrol acetate (Megace) and may replace tamoxifen for the first-line hormonal therapy for metastatic breast cancer patients. In fact, these drugs are now used in many hospitals and clinics for patients with metastatic breast cancer who were previously given tamoxifen as adjuvant treatment. However, the primary concern is whether they can be used as first-line agents for adjuvant treatment of primary breast cancer or are suitable for breast cancer prevention in view of possible adverse side effects. Recently, the Arimidex and Tamoxifen Alone or in Combination trial demonstrated the superiority in terms of disease-free survival of anastrozole over tamoxifen in adjuvant use for postmenopausal patients with Stage I and II primary breast cancer. The results of this report indicate the potential of anastrozole as an alternative drug in the adjuvant setting, although the mean follow-up time is so far only 47 months. Additional data regarding survival resulting from comparative trials of letrozole and tamoxifen and of exemestane and tamoxifen are expected to be available in a few years. However, limited information is available regarding adverse events caused by long-term administration of aromatase inhibitors. Longer follow-up is needed to determine the efficacy and safety of these new aromatase inhibitors when used for adjuvant treatment of postmenopausal patients with breast cancer.     

The role of aromatase inhibitors in early breast cancer

Opinion statement The role of hormonal therapy for the treatment of patients with early stage breast cancer has been evaluated in many studies. The results of these studies establish tamoxifen as the gold standard of hormonal therapy for the adjuvant treatment of hormone receptorpositive invasive breast cancer in pre- and postmenopausal women. Studies show tamoxifen reduces the risk of invasive breast cancer in women at increased risk for the disease, including women with ductal carcinoma in situ. Tamoxifen has adverse effects such as hot flashes, increased risk of uterine cancer in postmenopausal women, and rare occurrence of thromboembolic disease. Despite the multiple therapeutic roles of tamoxifen, alternatives are needed. Aromatase inhibitors (AI) are drugs with antiestrogenic activity. AIs function by inhibiting the peripheral conversion of adrenally synthesized androstenedione to estradiol through inhibition of the aromatase enzyme. AIs do not suppress estradiol synthesis by the ovary adequately. Therefore, AIs are effective in reducing circulating estradiol levels in postmenopausal women, but not premenopausal women. Selective nonsteroidal AIs, including anastrozole (Arimidex; AstraZeneca, Wilmington, DE) and letrozole (Femara; Novartis, East Hanover, NJ), and the steroidal AI exemestane (Aromasin; Pharmacia, Peapack, NJ) have been associated with increased specificity and improved therapeutic index compared to nonselective AIs such as aminoglutethamide. Nonsteroidal and steroidal AIs have demonstrated to be superior to megestrol acetate in second-line therapy of postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer, and selective nonsteroidal AIs have shown to be superior to tamoxifen in first-line therapy of postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer. The ATAC (Arimidex, tamoxifen, alone, or in combination) trial is the only published randomized trial comparing the efficacy of an AI to tamoxifen for the adjuvant treatment of women with early breast cancer. This large study showed that at a median follow-up time of 33 months, anastrozole alone results in significant improvement in disease-free survival rates, reduction in contralateral breast cancers, and increased tolerability, compared to tamoxifen in postmenopausal women. Although the long-term effects of AIs are not known, the early positive results of the ATAC trial led to the approval of anastrozole by the US Food and Drug Administration for use as adjuvant hormonal therapy for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive invasive breast cancer. Thus, there is an alternative to tamoxifen for postmenopausal women with relative/absolute contraindications to tamoxifen use or patients who choose not to take tamoxifen because of its side-effect profile. New AIs may challenge the position of tamoxifen as the gold standard for the treatment of early stage breast cancer in postmenopausal women.     

A comparison of the efficacy of aromatase inhibitors in second-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer

Randomized clinical trials have established the role of third-generation aromatase inhibitors (AIs) (letrozole, anastrozole, and exemestane) as standard treatment for patients with hormone-sensitive metastatic breast cancer who have experienced disease progression with antiestrogen therapy. Significant gains in clinical efficacy and improved tolerability over progestins (megestrol acetate) and the first-generation AI aminoglutethimide have positioned these agents above previous therapies. Estrogen receptor (ER) status remains the best predictive determinant of endocrine response, and further randomized trials with properly selected patient populations may distinguish individual AIs within this class. A recently completed, randomized, head-to-head phase III trial of letrozole versus anastrozole as second-line endocrine therapy demonstrated a significant difference in objective response rate for letrozole compared with anastrozole (19% versus 12%, respectively; P = 0.014), with similar time to progression. The improved efficacy and safety of AIs as second-line endocrine therapies has spawned trials of their use as first-line endocrine therapy versus tamoxifen for patients with metastatic breast cancer. Based on favorable results from these trials, letrozole and anastrozole have also been approved for use as first-line treatment of postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer.     

Exemestane improves survival compared with megoestrol acetate in postmenopausal patients with advanced breast cancer who have failed on tamoxifen. results Of a double-blind randomised phase III trial

Exemestane is an aromatase inactivator. 769 Postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer who had failed on tamoxifen were randomised to exemestane or megoestrol acetate in this double-blind trial. Objective response rate was similar between treatments. Median time to progression, time to treatment failure and overall survival was significantly longer with exemestane. Drug-related withdrawals and drug-related deaths were more common with megoestrol acetate.     

The third-generation non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors: A review of their clinical benefits in the second-line hormonal treatment of advanced breast cancer

Three new aromatase inhibitors have recently completed phase III evaluation as treatment of metastatic breast cancer in post-menopausal women whose disease has progressed despite tamoxifen therapy: anastrozole (ARIMIDEX, Zeneca), letrozole (FEMARA, Novartis) and vorozole (RIVIZOR, Janssen). All belong to the third generation of non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors, and each is superior to previous generations in terms of potency and selectivity.The trials that have been performed compare each agent to megestrol acetate, and letrozole and vorozole to aminoglutethimide. Although the studies are not directly comparable due to differing study designs and patient populations, it has been demonstrated each of these drugs provides single agent, once-daily, oral palliation of hormone-responsive, post-menopausal metastatic breast cancer. Letrozole is clearly more effective than megestrol acetate, and anastrozole and vorozole are possibly so. All three are better tolerated than the progestin, particularly in terms of weight gain. Both letrozole and vorozole are significantly more effective, and better tolerated than aminoglutethimide. Overall, this most recent generation of aromatase inhibitors is a clear improvement on our current standard second-line therapies.In 1999, tamoxifen remains the first choice in the hormonal therapy of breast cancer. Following tamoxifen failure, the optimal second-line hormonal therapy remains undefined, but aminoglutethimide and megestrol acetate are no longer optimal therapy in this setting. The third-generation non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors must now be compared to each other, to the steroidal aromatase inhibitors, to the pure anti-oestrogens, and to tamoxifen.     

Current status and future potential role of exemestane in the treatment of early and advanced breast cancer (Review)

Exemestane is a new oral steroidal aromatase inactivator, active in postmenopausal women with hormonal sensitive breast carcinoma. This drug, at a dosage of 25 mg once daily, was shown to suppress in vivo aromatase activity by 97.9%, with a subsequent reduction superior to 85% of circulating oestrogen level. It exhibits definite antitumor activity at a relatively low daily dose, and is highly potent, highly selective, and well-tolerated. Moreover, for postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer, exemestane demonstrated a higher activity and lower toxicity profile when compared to megestrol acetate and tamoxifen in second- and first-line therapy, respectively. New data on exemestane are forthcoming both in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant setting, which could improve the management of early breast cancer in the future.     

Sequencing of endocrine therapies in breast cancer--integration of recent data

A wide range of endocrine therapies has demonstrated activity in the treatment of hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer and sequential tumor responses to sequential hormonal therapies are common. However, the optimal sequence of the hormonal therapies has not yet been determined. The selection of endocrine therapies in women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer is strongly influenced by the menopausal status of the patient. For premenopausal women, tamoxifen alone or combined with ovarian suppression using a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist - such as goserelin or leuprolide - is an appropriate first-line hormonal therapy. Ovarian ablation or megestrol acetate is an appropriate second-line hormonal therapy for premenopausal women treated with tamoxifen as first-line therapy, or ovarian ablation plus an aromatase inhibitor (AI) or megestrol acetate for women treated with first-line tamoxifen plus an LHRH agonist. For postmenopausal women, the non-steroidal AIs anastrozole and letrozole now represent the preferred first-line hormonal treatment for metastatic breast cancer, based upon both efficacy and toxicity considerations. For second-line therapy in postmenopausal women, a number of options now exist, including tamoxifen, the steroidal AI exemestane, and the new agent fulvestrant. Fulvestrant, a novel estrogen receptor (ER) antagonist that downregulates the ER and has no known agonist effects, has been demonstrated to be at least as effective as anastrozole in postmenopausal women whose tumors progress on tamoxifen. The establishment of the optimal sequence of the endocrine therapies should offer significant benefits to women with hormone-sensitive metastatic breast cancer.     

Aromatase inhibition in the treatment of advanced breast cancer: is there a relationship between potency and clinical efficacy?

Two-thirds of breast tumours are oestrogen-receptor positive and 60-70% of these tumours respond to interventions that reduce the effects of oestrogen. Until recently, tamoxifen was the drug of choice for the treatment of hormone-responsive early and advanced breast cancer. However, tamoxifen is associated with increased incidences of endometrial cancer and thromboembolic disease, and many tumours eventually become resistant to treatment with tamoxifen. Thus, there is a need for alternative therapies with different mechanisms of action. In postmenopausal women, aromatase inhibitors (AIs) suppress oestrogen levels by inhibiting oestrogen synthesis via the aromatase enzyme pathway. The third-generation AIs (anastrozole, letrozole and exemestane) are more potent than the earlier AIs (aminoglutethimide, formestane and fadrozole) with respect to both aromatase inhibition and oestrogen suppression. While the earlier AIs were unable to show any benefit over megestrol acetate or tamoxifen as second- and first-line therapy, respectively, in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer, third-generation AIs have shown significant benefits in both settings. Comparison of aromatase inhibition and oestrogen suppression between the third-generation AIs anastrozole and letrozole showed a small but significantly greater difference in the degree of suppression of oestrone and oestrone sulphate (but not oestradiol), with letrozole. In an open-label trial, there were no significant differences between letrozole and anastrozole for the clinical end points of time to progression (primary end point), time to treatment failure, overall survival, clinical benefit, duration of clinical benefit, time to response, duration of response or objective response rate in patients with confirmed hormone receptor-positive tumours. Together these data suggest that once a certain threshold of aromatase inhibition is reached, small differences in oestrogen suppression between the third-generation AIs do not lead to clinically significant differences in overall efficacy.     

Role of anastrozole across the breast cancer continuum: from advanced to early disease and prevention

Breast tumorigenesis is a continuum from preinvasive lesions to early breast cancer and advanced disease. In this article the data supporting the use of the aromatase inhibitor anastrozole in postmenopausal women across this continuum are reviewed. In advanced disease, anastrozole has a significant survival benefit and tolerability advantage compared with megestrol acetate when used as second-line treatment. As first-line therapy, anastrozole significantly prolongs time to progression compared with tamoxifen in women with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) disease. In the adjuvant setting, anastrozole has superior efficacy and tolerability compared with tamoxifen in newly diagnosed patients and those who have already received 2-3 years' prior adjuvant tamoxifen. Therefore, anastrozole should be considered a preferred treatment option for postmenopausal women with HR+ early breast cancer. Furthermore, anastrozole has preoperative efficacy in HR+ large or locally advanced tumors. Finally, anastrozole substantially reduces the incidence of contralateral breast cancer compared with tamoxifen in women with HR+ early breast cancer and, therefore, is a potential chemopreventive agent. Anastrozole is thus positioned to become the standard care for postmenopausal women with HR+ disease across the whole breast cancer continuum. Additional data from ongoing studies will further clarify the role of anastrozole across the continuum and answer outstanding questions regarding the optimal timing and duration of treatment.     

Role of anti-aromatase agents in postmenopausal advanced breast cancer

PURPOSE: Endocrine therapy is a well-recognized approach to the treatment of postmenopausal patients with advanced breast cancer, particularly those with estrogen receptor-positive tumors. The availability of anti-aromatase agents, both reversible (nonsteroidal) and irreversible (steroidal), provides clinicians with additional hormonal treatment options. METHODS: A MEDLINE search was conducted to identify studies that evaluated anti-aromatase therapy in the treatment of postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer. In selecting studies, priority was given to randomized, controlled trials. RESULTS: Tamoxifen is the standard first-line therapy for advanced breast cancer. However, recent results have demonstrated the efficacy of newer anti-aromatase agents in this setting. Among patients who have progressed after tamoxifen therapy, anti-aromatase agents have emerged as first choice therapy based on their better tolerability and improved efficacy compared with megestrol acetate. Exemestane and anastrozole (irreversible and reversible anti-aromatase agents, respectively) have demonstrated survival benefits over megestrol acetate in second-line therapy. Anti-aromatase agents have also demonstrated efficacy in patients who have failed multiple hormonal therapies. Based on these data, an algorithm for the treatment of postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer is proposed. CONCLUSIONS: The enhanced tolerability and superior efficacy of anti-aromatase inhibitors compared with megestrol acetate has resulted in these agents becoming the endocrine treatment of choice for women with advanced breast cancer who have progressed after tamoxifen treatment. The increased use of tamoxifen in the adjuvant setting and the demonstrated activity of aromatase inhibitors in first-line therapy will further increase the role of these agents.     

Endocrine effects of the combination of megestrol acetate and tamoxifen in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer

Six postmenopausal patients with metastatic breast cancer, who responded to megestrol acetate after 6 weeks of treatment, were treated with the combination of megestrol acetate and tamoxifen during the next 6 weeks. The study was oriented towards the endocrine effects of this combination since it was known from our previous studies that megestrol acetate induces suppression of serum gonadotropins and of the pituitary-adrenal axis, a decrease of peripheral concentration of SHBG and of estradiol, and an increase of basal and TRH-stimulated plasma prolactin concentration. Tamoxifen, on the other hand, produces a decrease of prolactin and gonadotropins, whilst estradiol remains unaffected. Although the role of prolactin in the growth of human breast cancer has not been elucidated yet and there is no unequivocal evidence that a decrease in plasma prolactin could be of benefit for treatment of metastatic breast cancer, we tested whether addition of tamoxifen to the treatment regimen eliminated megestrol acetate-induced hyperprolactinaemia. The results show that addition of tamoxifen to megestrol acetate treatment annihilated the hyper-response of prolactin to TRH stimulation, while basal prolactin levels remained unaffected. The negative effect on plasma gonadotropin concentration appeared to be amplified, while estradiol and cortisol were not affected and SHBG increased. The results of these endocrine investigations merit a further study, directed to antitumor effects of this combination modality.     

To switch or not to switch: should the updated Intergroup Exemestane Study alter our decision?

Adjuvant therapy for breast cancer with aromatase inhibitors improves survival compared with tamoxifen; however, whether they should be given upfront or sequentially after 2-3 years of tamoxifen in estrogen receptor-positive early breast cancer affecting postmenopausal women is unclear. The Intergroup Exemestane Study looked at 4724 postmenopausal patients with estrogen receptor-positive or unknown breast cancer who had been disease free for 2-3 years on tamoxifen and were randomly assigned to switch to exemestane or to continue tamoxifen for the remainder of a 5-year endocrine treatment period. A significant disease-free survival advantage (p = 0.0001) was seen in favor of exemestane, with an absolute benefit of 3.3% by the end of treatment. This trial is the first to show an overall survival advantage for switching in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer (p相似文献   

Randomized comparison of the effects of tamoxifen, megestrol acetate, or tamoxifen plus megestrol acetate on treatment response and survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer

BACKGROUND:: The antioestrogen tamoxifen and progestins act via differentreceptors and may therefore have complementary effects againsthuman breast cancer. This possibility was tested in a randomizedstudy which compared the effects of tamoxifen, standard-dosemegestrol acetate, and these two agents in combination, in patientswith metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS:: 184 post-menopausal patients with metastatic breast cancer wererandomized to initial treatment with either tamoxifen (TAM)40 mg daily, megestrol acetate (MA) 160 mgm daily, or the combinationof the two administered simultaneously. Patients crossed overto the alternative single agent on relapse or disease progression.Patients were evaluated for response, time to initial and ultimatetreatment failure, and survival. RESULTS:: There were no significant differences between the three groupswith respect to response rates, nor the other parameters. Patientsurvival was significantly associated with age >60 years,ER positive status, and the absence of visceral metastases. CONCLUSIONS:: TAM and MA are both equally effective in response inductionas initial treatments and the combination has no advantage.Sequential treatment is still optimal, TAM being the preferredinitial agent in view of the reported side effects with MA. breast, cancer, megestrol acetate, randomized, trial, tamoxifen     

Mature results of a randomized phase II multicenter study of exemestane versus tamoxifen as first-line hormone therapy for postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Women with hormone-responsive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) may respond to or have stable disease with a number of hormone therapies. We explored the efficacy and safety of the steroidal aromatase inactivator exemestane as first-line hormonal therapy in MBC in postmenopausal women. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with measurable disease were eligible if they had received no prior hormone therapy for metastatic disease and had hormone receptor positive disease or hormone receptor unknown disease with a long disease-free interval from adjuvant therapy. They were randomized to tamoxifen 20 mg/day or exemestane 25 mg/day in this open-label study. RESULTS: Blinded independently reviewed response rates for exemestane and tamoxifen were 41% and 17%, respectively. Fifty-seven per cent of exemestane- and 42% of tamoxifen-treated patients experienced clinical benefit, defined as complete or partial response, or disease stabilization lasting at least 6 months. There was a low incidence of severe flushing, sweating, nausea and edema in women who received exemestane. One exemestane-treated patient had a pulmonary embolism with grade 4 dyspnea. CONCLUSIONS: Exemestane is well tolerated and active in the first-line treatment of hormone-responsive MBC. An ongoing EORTC phase III trial is comparing the efficacy, measuring time-to-disease progression, of exemestane and tamoxifen.     

Advances in endocrine treatments for postmenopausal women with metastatic and early breast cancer

For the past 25 years, the estrogen antagonist tamoxifen has been the hormonal treatment of choice for postmenopausal patients with hormone-sensitive metastatic and early breast cancer (EBC). However, tamoxifen is associated with certain tolerability and safety concerns. In addition, the hormonal options after progression are limited, and thus, alternative endocrine treatments have been developed. This review provides a synopsis of the newer alternatives in endocrine therapy of breast cancer: the aromatase inhibitors (AIs) and fulvestrant Faslodex), the estrogen receptor antagonist that downregulates estrogen and progesterone receptors and has no known agonist activity. The third-generation AIs, anastrozole and letrozole, have been shown to be as effective or more effective than megestrol acetate and tamoxifen as second- and first-line therapies for the treatment of postmenopausal patients with metastatic breast cancer, and exemestane has been approved for second-line use. Fulvestrant has been shown to be as effective as anastrozole as second-line therapy for metastatic breast cancer and has been approved in the U.S. for the treatment of postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer following progression on antiestrogen therapy. Anastrozole is the only AI with published clinical trial data and U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval for adjuvant therapy of postmenopausal women with EBC. The 'Arimidex,' Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination (ATAC) trial, a double-blind, multicenter trial with 9,366 patients, compared tamoxifen with anastrozole, alone and in combination, as adjuvant endocrine treatment for postmenopausal patients with operable, invasive, EBC. The first analysis (at a median follow-up of 33.3 months) showed longer disease-free survival and, in general, better tolerability with anastrozole than with tamoxifen. This pattern was maintained at later analyses with a median follow-up of 47 months for efficacy and 37 months for safety and tolerability. Although longer follow-up is warranted, anastrozole appears to be a well-documented choice of endocrine adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal women with hormone-responsive breast cancer.     

Treatment Options For Postmenopausal Women with Tamoxifen-Resistant Advanced Breast Cancer

Tamoxifen resistance can be classified into de novo (with disease progression within 6 months of treatment) and acquired (with an initial clinical benefit of at least 6 months followed by subsequent disease progression). Further endocrine therapy tends to be the treatment of choice when acquired resistance develops, especially when there has been a long duration of response to tamoxifen, in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer. These endocrine agents used to be progestogens (e.g. megestrol acetate) or aminoglutethimide. They have now been replaced by third-generation aromatase inhibitors (anastrozole, letrozole and exemestane) which have shown superior efficacy and tolerability compared with the traditional agents. The pure anti-estrogen, fulvestrant, has also been shown to be at least equivalent to anastrozole and is currently being evaluated in phase III trials. Recently, the third-generation aromatase inhibitors are challenging the role of tamoxifen as a first line endocrine agent. It is, therefore, envisaged that the use of endocrine agents at the time of tamoxifen resistance (when used as a second-line therapy) would become more complex and depend on the response of prior agents used. For patients with de novo resistance, chemotherapy is the standard treatment option, although for those who refuse chemotherapy or are deemed unfit a second-line endocrine agent could be tried. Newer biological therapies such as monoclonal antibodies (e.g. trastuzumab), tyrosine kinase inhibitors (ZD1839) and cell cycle inhibitors (e.g. CCI-779) are either available for clinical use or being investigated in trials.     

The breast cancer continuum in hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer in postmenopausal women: evolving management options focusing on aromatase inhibitors.

There are now a number of highly effective options for the treatment of hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer. Although tamoxifen was the standard hormonal treatment for many years, we now have another option for postmenopausal women: the third-generation aromatase inhibitors (AIs) anastrozole, exemestane and letrozole. A number of trials have investigated the use of third-generation AIs compared with tamoxifen throughout the continuum of treatment settings for postmenopausal women with breast cancer. In the neoadjuvant setting, letrozole, given for 4 months, resulted in better overall clinical response and breast-conserving surgery rates than tamoxifen. The Immediate Preoperative Anastrozole Tamoxifen or Combined with Tamoxifen trial gave anastrozole for 3 months with no difference in clinical response but significantly improved breast-conserving surgery rates. Compared with tamoxifen, anastrozole and letrozole significantly improved disease-free survival as early adjuvant treatment for hormone-receptor-positive disease. Switching to anastrozole or exemestane after 2 to 3 years of adjuvant tamoxifen for a total of 5 years of therapy was also more effective than continued tamoxifen. All three agents are approved in the early adjuvant or switching setting in the USA. Letrozole following 5 years of tamoxifen as extended adjuvant treatment improved disease-free survival and, in the node-positive subgroup, overall survival when compared with placebo. Anastrozole and letrozole are both approved for the first-line treatment of hormone-sensitive advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women; letrozole showed an improved response rate compared with tamoxifen. Anastrozole, letrozole and exemestane are all indicated for the second-line treatment of advanced breast cancer. In summary, third-generation AIs have been shown to have superior efficacy over tamoxifen in the metastatic, neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings and to improve outcome as extended adjuvant therapy following 5 years of tamoxifen. Ongoing studies will further define the role of sequential adjuvant treatment. Appropriate duration of treatment is another important area of investigation. This review will cover hormonal therapy for postmenopausal women with breast cancer and will not address the treatment of premenopausal women.