Airway inflammation assessed by invasive and noninvasive means in severe asthma: eosinophilic and noneosinophilic phenotypes

BACKGROUND: Airway inflammation assessed by bronchial biopsies demonstrates distinct eosinophilic and noneosinophilic phenotypes in severe asthma, but their relationship to other biomarkers of disease (induced sputum and nitric oxide [NO]) is not clear. OBJECTIVES: We sought to compare airway inflammation using noninvasive (induced sputum, exhaled NO), and invasive (bronchial biopsies) methods in moderate and severe asthma and to assess whether induced sputum and exhaled NO would allow the identification of eosinophilic and noneosinophilic phenotypes in severe asthma. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study of 32 subjects with severe asthma and 35 subjects with moderate asthma, from whom we obtained bronchial biopsies, induced sputum, and exhaled NO measurements. RESULTS: Among subjects with severe asthma, we identified eosinophilic and noneosinophilic phenotypes using both bronchial biopsies and sputum cell counts. However, the vast majority of subjects with high sputum eosinophil counts did not have high mucosal eosinophil counts. Exhaled NO was increased in the eosinophilic phenotype as judged from bronchial biopsy findings, but not on the basis of induced sputum. Subjects with high sputum eosinophil counts experienced more asthma exacerbations than the subjects with low sputum eosinophil counts. In contrast, we did not find any differences in the clinical characteristics between eosinophilic and noneosinophilic phenotypes that were identified by bronchial biopsies. CONCLUSION: The use of sputum cell counts allowed the identification of a subgroup of subjects with severe asthma who were at risk of more frequent asthma exacerbations. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Monitoring sputum eosinophil counts in subjects with severe asthma may allow identifying the subjects with the greatest disease activity.     

Effects of interleukin (IL)-3 and IL-5 on human eosinophil degranulation induced by complement components C3a and C5a*

It is suggested that eosinophils (Eos) play an important role in the pathogenesis of bronchial asthma by releasing cytotoxic cationic eosinophil granule proteins and damaging bronchial epithelial cells. However, the exact nature of the actual inducer of eosinophil degranulation in vivo is unclear. We examined eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) release from human Eos in response to soluble agonists such as C5a, C3a, platelet-activating factor, and FMLP with or without interleukin (IL)-3 or IL-5 priming. Eosinophil degranulation induced by these soluble agonists required the pretreatment of Eos by cytochalasin B even in IL-3 priming. Among four agonists, C5a was the most effective stimulus of ECP release either with or without IL-5 priming. IL-3 and IL-5 remarkably enhanced ECP release in Eos triggered by C3a and C5a. The enhancement of ECP release by IL-3 and IL-5 occurred at 0.1–0.3 ng/ml and became maximal at 10–30 ng/ml, concentration-dependently. The enhancement of ECP release by cytokines became optimal at an interval of 10 min. Our data support the importance of complement components and cytokines in eosinophil degranulation in vivo.     

Expression of eotaxin in induced sputum of atopic and nonatopic asthmatics

BACKGROUND: The chemokine eotaxin has been implicated in airway eosinophilia in atopic asthma. We have compared airway eosinophils and eotaxin expression in induced sputum from well-matched atopic and nonatopic asthmatics. METHODS: Eosinophil numbers, eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), and the expression of eotaxin were examined in induced sputum from atopic asthmatics (AA = 11), nonatopic asthmatics (NAA = 11), and atopic (AC = 12) and normal (NC = 10) controls. Slides were prepared for differential cell counts by Romanowsky stain, and ECP levels were measured by RIA. Eotaxin expression was detected by in situ hybridization, with 35S-labelled riboprobes and immunocytochemistry. RESULTS: The numbers of eosinophils and ECP concentration were increased in the sputum of AA and NAA compared with AC and NC (P < 0.05). The numbers of eotaxin mRNA+ and immunoreactive cells were increased in NAA, but not AA, when compared with controls (P < 0.05). Eotaxin immunoreactive cells in NAA were significantly higher than in AA (P < 0.05). Eotaxin was expressed predominantly by macrophages, eosinophils, and epithelial cells. In NAA, but not AA, the numbers of eotaxin mRNA+ cells were correlated with histamine PC20 (r = -0.81, P < 0.01) and eosinophil numbers in sputum (r = 0.7, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Eotaxin production by macrophages, eosinophils, and epithelial cells may play a more pronounced role in airway eosinophilia in nonatopic than in atopic asthma.     

Sensitivity of sputum eosinophil cationic protein level for monitoring asthmatic patients with normal peak expiratory flow]

Previous studies have shown that eosinophils and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) levels in the sputum of patients with asthma closely reflect inflammatory activity of the bronchial mucosa. We examined whether the ECP level or eosinophil count in induced sputum provides information useful in determining whether to taper the dose of medications or to terminate treatment especially with inhaled corticosteroids in patients with well controlled asthma. We studied 15 adults with asthma who consistently maintained a peak expiratory flow (PEF) value within 80% or more of their predicted value (green zone) for at least 4 weeks with no asthmatic symptoms. All patients underwent at least two hypretonic saline inhalation tests. Forty sputum samples were obtained for evaluation of cell count and ECP level. Before the tests, patients were requested to record asthmatic symptoms, medications received, and morning and evening PEF values in a diary for more than 3 months. The relations among clinical and laboratory variables, including symptoms scores, medication scores, asthma scores (= symptom scores + medication scores). PEF values, forced expiratory volume (FEV1.0) during the test, and sputum eosinophil count or sputum ECP, were analyzed. The sputum ECP level correlated significantly with the percentage of eosinophils in the sputum (rs = 0.783). There were also significant correlations between the sputum ECP level and the mean weekly symptom scores (rs = 0.500-0.510), medication scores (rs = 0.510-0.540), and asthma scores (rs = 0.509-0.548). However, there were no significant correlations among sputum ECP level, mean morning PEF or evening PEF, daily variation in PEF, and FEV1.0. We conclude that the sputum ECP level is a sensitive laboratory variable useful in monitoring the presence of eosinophilic inflammation in the bronchial mucosa of patients with bronchial asthma, especially those who have mild or no symptoms with normal PEF.     

Airway inflammation in asthma and perennial allergic rhinitis. Relationship with nonspecific bronchial responsiveness and maximal airway narrowing

BACKGROUND: Eosinophilic airway inflammation is the hallmark of asthma, but it has also been reported in other conditions such as allergic rhinitis. We have tested whether the analysis of cells and chemicals in sputum can distinguish between patients with mild allergic asthma, those with allergic rhinitis, and healthy controls. The relationship between inflammation markers in sputum and nonspecific bronchial hyperresponsiveness to methacholine (BHR) (PD20 and maximal response plateau [MRP] values) was also evaluated. METHODS: We selected 31 mild asthmatics and 15 rhinitis patients sensitized to house-dust mite. As a control group, we studied 10 healthy subjects. Every subject underwent the methacholine bronchial provocation test (M-BPT) and sputum induction. Blood eosinophils and serum ECP levels were measured. Sputum cell differentials were assessed, and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), tryptase, albumin, and interleukin (IL)-5 levels were measured in the entire sputum supernatant. RESULTS: Blood eosinophils and serum ECP levels were higher in asthma patients and rhinitis than in healthy controls, but no difference between asthma patients and rhinitis patients was found. Asthmatics had higher eosinophil counts and higher ECP and tryptase levels in sputum than rhinitis patients or control subjects. Sputum albumin levels were higher in asthmatics than in controls. Rhinitis patients exhibited higher sputum eosinophils than healthy controls. An association between sputum eosinophil numbers and MPR values (r= -0.57) was detected, and a trend toward correlation between sputum ECP levels and PD20 values (r= -0.47) was found in the rhinitis group, but not in asthmatics. No correlation between blood eosinophilic inflammation and lung functional indices was found. CONCLUSIONS: Induced sputum is an accurate method to study bronchial inflammation, allowing one to distinguish between rhinitis patients and mildly asthmatic patients. The fact that no relationship was detected between sputum inflammation and BHR suggests that other factors, such as airway remodeling, may be at least partly responsible for BHR in asthma.     

Diagnostic accuracy of sputum outcomes in chronic stable asthma

BACKGROUND: Asthma with non-remitting airflow obstruction may not always be differentiated from COPD with airway hyperreactivity. Many attempts have been made to find useful markers for the distinction between these two disorders. OBJECTIVE AND METHODS: In order to help the finding of a useful marker for the diagnosis of asthma in the population of patients with airway obstruction we analysed the diagnostic accuracy of sputum eosinophils and sputum ECP in 91 patients with asthma, 15 patients with chronic bronchitis, 32 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and 20 controls subjects, by performing ROC analysis. RESULTS: Sputum eosinophils were above the normal range of our laboratory (0-3.7%) in 48 asthma patients and in six COPD patients, while sputum ECP (normal range < 85 microg/L) was high in 65 asthma patients, in 24 COPD patients and in nine chronic bronchitis patients. The ROC analysis revealed that sputum eosinophils count (AUC = 0.82) was more accurate than both sputum ECP levels (AUC = 0.56) (P < 0.0001) and beta2-reversibility (AUC = 0.53) (P = 0.0001) in differentiating asthmatic from non-asthmatic subjects (COPD, chronic bronchitis patients and normal subjects). The diagnostic accuracy of ECP was similar to that of bronchial reversibility (P = 0.76). When ROC analysis was performed by including only patients with airway obstruction (36 asthmatics with airway obstruction and COPD patients), both eosinophil count (AUC = 0.77) and beta2-reversibility (AUC = 0.66) were more accurate than ECP measurement (AUC = 0.39) in discriminating asthmatics from COPD patients (P < 0.00001 and P = 0.04, respectively). CONCLUSION: Sputum eosinophils seem to be valid markers for detecting asthma in a population of patients with airway obstruction. Moreover, the higher diagnostic accuracy of eosinophils in the sputum compared to sputum ECP and bronchial reversibility reinforces the role of cytological analysis of sputum in the diagnosis of chronic stable bronchial asthma.     

Nitric oxide metabolites,eosinophils, and eosinophilic cationic protein in patients with asthma: sputum versus blood

The monitoring of airway inflammation has assessed in bronchial asthma directly by sputum examination, and indirectly by measurements in peripheral blood. To investigate the diagnostic value of these two methods, we compared nitric oxide (NO) metabolites, eosinophils, and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) in sputum and blood in patients with asthma and control subjects. Sputum and serum were obtained from fifteen patients with asthma, and then were examined before anti-asthma treatment, including steroid preparations. ECP was measured by fluoroimmunoassay. NO metabolites were assayed by using modified Griess reaction. Asthmatic patients, compared with control subjects, had significantly higher level of NO metabolites, higher proportion of eosinophils, and higher levels of ECP in sputum. Asthmatic patients, compared with control subjects, however, had significantly higher number of eosinophils, and were at higher levels of ECP in blood. FEV1, FEV1/FVC was negatively correlated with sputum eosinophils. The area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve showed that eosinophils in sputum are significantly accurate markers than NO metabolites in sputum and blood. These findings suggest that the proportion of eosinophils in sputum have more accurate diagnostic marker of asthmatic airway inflammation than NO metabolites in sputum in differentiating asthmatic patients from control subjects.     

Eosinophils and eosinophilic cationic protein in induced sputum and blood: effects of budesonide and terbutaline treatment.

BACKGROUND: There is a need for easily measurable markers of airway inflammation to guide the use of anti-inflammatory treatment in asthma. Eosinophilic cationic protein (ECP) levels in sputum and blood correlate with clinical severity, and serial measurements of ECP have been proposed as a suitable candidate. AIMS AND METHODS: Our aim was to confirm that sputum and serum ECP measurements would provide a more sensitive indicator of responses to asthma treatment than eosinophil counts per se, in a randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study of terbutaline, budesonide, and their combination in patients with chronic persistent asthma. We compared the changes in eosinophil counts and ECP in induced sputum and blood during each treatment period. RESULTS: Budesonide and combined treatment caused a significant reduction in sputum eosinophils (-2.7% and -2.3%, respectively, P < 0.05). Sputum eosinophils increased with terbutaline (+3.9%, P = 0.049). In contrast, the changes for sputum ECP were not significant. There was a similar treatment effect on blood eosinophils, but not for serum ECP. Correlations between sputum and blood eosinophils were significant with and without budesonide, but were nonsignificant between sputum and blood ECP during the active treatments. Correlations between sputum eosinophils and ECP, and between blood eosinophils and serum ECP were greatest during treatment with placebo or terbutaline alone: budesonide weakened or abolished these relationships. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with eosinophil counts, ECP measurements in either induced sputum or serum failed to reflect treatment-related changes in chronic asthma. We conclude that ECP is not a sensitive or reliable means of evaluating airway inflammation, and can not be recommended for assessing responses to anti-inflammatory therapy.     

Eosinophil activation in acute asthma attacks evaluated by electronmicroscopic findings of eosinophils and the concentration of eosinophil cationic protein in sputum]

We evaluated the activation of eosinophils in the airways of patients with acute asthma attacks by measuring the concentration of sputum eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) and changes in the electron densities of the eosinophil specific granules in sputum. In six hospitalized patients with asthmatic attacks, sputum samples were collected for seven consecutive days after admission and were used for the evaluation of eosinophil activation. The concentration of sputum ECP, the incidence of changes in the electron densities of eosinophil specific granules and the severity of asthma attacks were highest on the day of admission and decreased in association with each other after treatment. A significant correlation was found between the concentration of sputum ECP and the incidence of changes in the electron densities of eosinophil specific granules. These findings suggest that the eosinophils in the airways are markedly activated and degranulated in asthma attacks.     

Relationship between sputum inflammatory markers and osmotic airway hyperresponsiveness during induction of sputum in asthmatic patients

Hypertonic saline aerosols are being used increasingly for bronchial provocation testing and induction of sputum. The aims of this study were to assess the response to challenge with 3% hypertonic saline administered via a ultrasonic nebulizer in patients with asthma, and to evaluate relationship between % fall of FEV1 during induction of sputum (osmotic airway hyperresponsiveness; osmotic AHR) and biochemical markers of induced sputum. We investigated changes in FEV1 in response to inhaling ultrasonically nebulized 3% saline in 25 patients with asthma and 10 control subjects. FEV1 was measured before, during, and after induction of sputum. We used fluoroimmunoassay to detect eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), immunohistochemical staining to detect EG2+ (secretory form of ECP) eosinophils, and a sandwich ELISA to detect interleukin (IL)-5. Protein concentration was determined by using bicinchoninic acid protein assay reagent. Asthmatics, compared with controls, had significantly higher osmotic AHR. Moderate to severe asthmatics had significantly higher osmotic AHR compared to mild asthmatics. Osmotic AHR was significantly correlated with the proportion of eosinophils, the levels of ECP, EG2+ eosinophils, IL-5, and proteins. These data suggest that osmotic AHR is closely related to the clinical status and biochemical markers of sputum supernatant in asthmatic patients.     

Eotaxin in induced sputum of asthmatics: relationship with eosinophils and eosinophil cationic protein in sputum

BACKGROUND: Eosinophilic inflammation is a crucial aspect of allergic diseases such as bronchial asthma. An eosinophil-active chemokine, eotaxin, may play a role in the pathogenesis of the tissue eosinophilia accompanying asthma. METHODS: Induced sputa were obtained from 53 patients with atopic asthma and six healthy subjects, and the concentration of eotaxin in the sputum was measured by ELISA. We investigated whether the sputum content of eotaxin is related to 1) asthma status or corticosteroid therapy, and 2) other sputum indices, including percentage of eosinophils and concentration of eosinophil cationic protein (ECP). RESULTS: The patients with stable or unstable asthma showed significantly higher concentrations of sputum eotaxin than the normal controls. The level of sputum eotaxin demonstrated a positive correlation with the percentage of eosinophils in stable asthmatics not receiving corticosteroid therapy, but not in stable patients treated with corticosteroids, or in unstable patients. Sputum eotaxin demonstrated a positive correlation with ECP in asthmatic patients who were either in a stable state or not receiving steroid therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The elevated level of eotaxin detected in association with increased eosinophils and ECP in the sputum of asthmatics suggests that eotaxin is involved in the pathogenesis of eosinophilic airway inflammation. The relationship of eotaxin to airway eosinophilia may be modified by the stability status of asthma and corticosteroid therapy.     

Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) in bronchial asthma

BACKGROUND: Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) is a pro-inflammatory cytokine favouring the secretion of TNFalpha and IL-8 and counteracts anti-inflammatory effects of corticosteroids. Airways inflammation is a central feature of bronchial asthma and is characterized by the accumulation of eosinophils. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate whether MIF is related to asthma symptoms and eosinophil accumulation in the airways. METHODS: Serum MIF levels were measured by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in 44 healthy subjects and 44 asthmatics. Levels of MIF in induced sputum were measured in 10 healthy subjects and 15 asthmatics. Levels of eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) in induced sputum were measured by a radioimmunosorbent assay. Fluorescence double immunostaining was conducted to examine cellular source and localization of MIF. RESULTS: Serum MIF levels were significantly increased in asthmatic patients compared with age and sex-matched control subjects. Symptomatic patients had a higher MIF level than asymptomatic patients. Induced sputum obtained from asthmatics contained higher levels of MIF than those from control subjects. MIF levels in induced sputum were correlated with ECP levels in induced sputum. MIF was colocalized with eosinophil peroxidase staining in the cytoplasm of sputum cells. CONCLUSION: Increased MIF levels are associated with asthma symptoms and one of the cellular sources of MIF in the airways are eosinophils.     

Inflammatory biomarkers in airways of patients with severe asthma compared with non-severe asthma

Background About 5–10% of patients with asthma suffer from poorly-controlled disease despite corticosteroid (CS) therapy.
Objective We determined whether there were any differences in inflammatory biomarkers between severe and non-severe asthma patients.
Methods Nineteen severe and 20 non-severe asthma patients were recruited and underwent collection of induced sputum, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid and bronchial biopsies.
Results Biopsy results showed no differences in eosinophils (major basic protein positive), neutrophils, macrophages, T cells and mast cells in the bronchial submucosa. However, subbasement membrane (SBM) thickness and smooth muscle area were increased in the biopsies. No significant differences were observed in the induced sputum inflammatory cells. In BAL fluid, there was a significant increase in neutrophils but a significant decrease in macrophages. Eosinophil counts were non-significantly increased threefold in both sputum and BAL in severe asthma. Levels of IL-8 and IL-13 in sputum supernatants were similar in both groups of asthma patients. There was a significant inverse correlation between post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s and provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV₁ with SBM thickness.
Conclusion Differences in inflammatory cells were observed mainly in terms of increased neutrophils and reduction in macrophage numbers in BAL fluid with a trend towards increased eosinophils in severe asthma compared with non-severe asthma. However, the most notable features are the increase in features of airway wall remodelling of SBM thickness and smooth muscle area.     

Allergen-induced bronchial inflammation in house dust mite-allergic patients with or without asthma

BACKGROUND: It is presently unknown which factors determine the occurrence and persistence of asthma in house dust mite-allergic individuals. The level of allergen-specific IgE antibodies does not seem to be decisive for asthmatic symptoms. Moreover, levels of exposure to mite allergens do not seem to differ significantly between asthmatic and non-asthmatics individuals. AIM: It was hypothesized that the presence or absence of asthmatic symptoms in house dust mite-allergic patients is associated with quantitative or qualitative differences in the cellular bronchial inflammatory response during the late phase of the allergic reaction. This hypothesis was tested in the bronchial allergen challenge model. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Whole lung challenges with house dust mite extract were performed in 52 house dust mite-allergic subjects, of whom 26 had asthma and 26 had perennial rhinitis without asthmatic symptoms. Primary outcomes were parameters for bronchial inflammation in serial samples of induced sputum (cell differentials, eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), interleukin-8 (IL-8), myeloperoxydase (MPO)). In addition, lung function, non-specific bronchial hyper-responsiveness and serial blood samples (eosinophils and IL-5) were analysed. RESULTS: At baseline sputum eosinophils and ECP were similar in both groups but neutrophils and IL-8 were higher in asthmatics. The early bronchoconstriction after allergen challenge was similar in asthma and non-asthmatic rhinitis (median decrease in FEV1: asthma -31.7% vs. non-asthmatics -29.1%, P > 0.1). The late phase bronchoconstriction was significantly greater in asthma (median decrease in FEV1: asthma -27.6% vs. non-asthmatics -18.9%, P = 0.02). Induction of bronchial hyper-responsiveness was similar in both groups. Bronchial allergen challenge elicited significant increases in sputum eosinophils and ECP, which were indistinguishable for both groups (P > 0.1 and P = 0.07, respectively). In contrast, higher numbers of neutrophils persisted in asthma 24h after challenge and were accompanied by significant increases in IL-8 and MPO, which were absent in non-asthmatics (difference between groups P = 0.007 and P = 0.05, respectively). CONCLUSION: Allergen challenge inducedvery similar increases in eosinophils and ECP in induced sputum in allergic asthmatics and in allergic non-asthmatic patients. The difference in bronchial inflammation between asthma and non-asthmatic rhinitis appeared to be more closely related to indices for neutrophilic inflammation.     

Activation states of blood eosinophils in asthma

Asthma is characterized by airway inflammation rich in eosinophils. Airway eosinophilia is associated with exacerbations and has been suggested to play a role in airway remodelling. Recruitment of eosinophils from the circulation requires that blood eosinophils become activated, leading to their arrest on the endothelium and extravasation. Circulating eosinophils can be envisioned as potentially being in different activation states, including non‐activated, pre‐activated or ‘primed’, or fully activated. In addition, the circulation can potentially be deficient of pre‐activated or activated eosinophils, because such cells have marginated on activated endothelium or extravasated into the tissue. A number of eosinophil surface proteins, including CD69, L‐selectin, intercellular adhesion molecule‐1 (ICAM‐1, CD54), CD44, P‐selectin glycoprotein ligand‐1 (PSGL‐1, CD162), cytokine receptors, Fc receptors, integrins including α_M integrin (CD11b), and activated conformations of Fc receptors and integrins, have been proposed to report cell activation. Variation in eosinophil activation states may be associated with asthma activity. Eosinophil surface proteins proposed to be activation markers, with a particular focus on integrins, and evidence for associations between activation states of blood eosinophils and features of asthma are reviewed here. Partial activation of β₁ and β₂ integrins on blood eosinophils, reported by monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) N29 and KIM‐127, is associated with impaired pulmonary function and airway eosinophilia, respectively, in non‐severe asthma. The association with lung function does not occur in severe asthma, presumably due to greater eosinophil extravasation, specifically of activated or pre‐activated cells, in severe disease.     

嗜酸性粒细胞阳离子蛋白在支气管哮喘中的研究

嗜酸性粒细胞阳离子蛋白(ECP)是活化嗜酸性细胞释放的强碱性蛋白中的重要组分,是嗜酸性粒细胞活化的重要标志,本文概述了ECP的来源,生物学作用以及与感染的关系,着重综述了ECP与支气管哮喘之间的关系。     

Phenotypic plasticity and targeting of Siglec‐FhighCD11clow eosinophils to the airway in a murine model of asthma

Eosinophil recruitment in asthma is a multistep process, involving both trans‐endothelial migration to the lung interstitium and trans‐epithelial migration into the airways. While the trans‐endothelial step is well studied, trans‐epithelial recruitment is less understood. To contrast eosinophil recruitment between these two compartments, we employed a murine kinetics model of asthma. Eosinophils were phenotyped by multicolor flow cytometry in digested lung tissue and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) simultaneously, 6 h after each ovalbumin (OVA) challenge. There was an early expansion of tissue eosinophils after OVA challenge followed by eosinophil buildup in both compartments and a shift in phenotype over the course of the asthma model. Gradual transition from a Siglec‐F^medCD11c^? to a Siglec‐F^highCD11c^low phenotype in lung tissue was associated with eosinophil recruitment to the airways, as all BAL eosinophils were of the latter phenotype. Secondary microarray analysis of tissue‐activated eosinophils demonstrated upregulation of specific integrin and chemokine receptor signature suggesting interaction with the mucosa. Using adhesion assays, we demonstrated that integrin CD11c mediated adhesion of eosinophils to fibrinogen, a significant component of epithelial barrier repair and remodeling. To the best of our knowledge, this is the only report to date dissecting compartmentalization of eosinophil recruitment as it unfolds during allergic inflammation. By capturing the kinetics of eosinophil phenotypic change in both tissue and BAL using flow cytometry and sorting, we were able to demonstrate a previously undocumented association between phenotypic shift of tissue‐recruited eosinophils and their trans‐epithelial movement, which implicates the existence of a specific mechanism targeting these cells to mucosal airways.     

Effect of pranlukast on bronchial inflammation in patients with asthma

BACKGROUND: Pranlukast (8-[p-(4-phenylbutyloxy) benzol] amino-2-[tetrazol-5-yl]-4-oxo-4H-1-benzopyran hemihydrate), a selective cysteinyl leukotriene receptor antagonist, has been reported to exhibit not only antileukotrine activity but also pharmacological activity including antieosinophilic effects. OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to investigate whether the antiasthmatic activity of pranlukast is associated with a reduction in eosinophilic inflammation. METHODS: A double-blind, randomized, crossover design was used. Subjects received 225 mg of pranlukast or placebo orally twice daily for 4 weeks and then, after a washout period of at least 4 weeks, crossed over to receive the alternative treatment. We assessed the effects of pretreatment with pranlukast on bronchoconstriction precipitated by inhalation of methacholine in 32 adult patients with mild or moderate bronchial asthma; those who were in stable clinical condition were allocated to this study. Blood and sputum samples were taken the morning of the methacholine provocation test. Eosinophil counts and measurement of eosinophilic cationic protein (ECP) were performed. RESULTS: After the 4 weeks of treatment with pranlukast, patients' symptoms, blood eosinophils, serum ECP, sputum eosinophils, and sputum ECP were significantly decreased. Furthermore, values of PC20-methacholine significantly improved in the treatment with pranlukast. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that pranlukast has an anti-inflammatory effect on bronchial eosinophilic infiltration. This study raises further interesting therapeutic possibilities and argues for further trials of new approaches to the treatment of bronchial asthma.     

维生素D3上调蛋白1在哮喘嗜酸粒细胞中的表达及其与细胞活化的关系

目的: 探讨维生素D3上调蛋白1（VDUP1）在哮喘患者外周血嗜酸粒细胞（EOS）中的表达及与EOS活化的关系。方法: 实验分为对照组、哮喘发作组和缓解组。抽取外周静脉血15 mL，计算诱导痰EOS%，测定第1秒最大呼气量占预计值百分比（FEV1.0%）和最大呼气中期流速占预计值百分比（PEF%）；ELISA法检测血清嗜酸粒细胞阳离子蛋白（ECP）浓度。RT-PCR及Western blotting方法检测外周血EOS VDUP1表达情况。IL-5 与EOS共孵育，检测EOS VDUP1表达情况，ELISA法检测培养上清液ECP浓度。结果: 哮喘发作组外周血EOS VDUP1表达均显著低于正常组及缓解组，与诱导痰EOS%及血清ECP浓度呈明显负相关；缓解组基因表达与正常对照组无显著差异，与上述指标也无明显相关。IL-5刺激下，EOS VDUP1表达明显降低，同时伴上清ECP明显升高。结论： 哮喘发作时外周血EOS VDUP1表达明显下调，EOS VDUP1表达与血清ECP及诱导痰EOS%呈明显负相关，IL-5促进EOS活化可能与VDUP1通路有关。