Electrical stimulation of the anterior nucleus of thalamus for treatment of refractory epilepsy

Purpose: We report a multicenter, double‐blind, randomized trial of bilateral stimulation of the anterior nuclei of the thalamus for localization‐related epilepsy. Methods: Participants were adults with medically refractory partial seizures, including secondarily generalized seizures. Half received stimulation and half no stimulation during a 3‐month blinded phase; then all received unblinded stimulation. Results: One hundred ten participants were randomized. Baseline monthly median seizure frequency was 19.5. In the last month of the blinded phase the stimulated group had a 29% greater reduction in seizures compared with the control group, as estimated by a generalized estimating equations (GEE) model (p = 0.002). Unadjusted median declines at the end of the blinded phase were 14.5% in the control group and 40.4% in the stimulated group. Complex partial and “most severe” seizures were significantly reduced by stimulation. By 2 years, there was a 56% median percent reduction in seizure frequency; 54% of patients had a seizure reduction of at least 50%, and 14 patients were seizure‐free for at least 6 months. Five deaths occurred and none were from implantation or stimulation. No participant had symptomatic hemorrhage or brain infection. Two participants had acute, transient stimulation‐associated seizures. Cognition and mood showed no group differences, but participants in the stimulated group were more likely to report depression or memory problems as adverse events. Discussion: Bilateral stimulation of the anterior nuclei of the thalamus reduces seizures. Benefit persisted for 2 years of study. Complication rates were modest. Deep brain stimulation of the anterior thalamus is useful for some people with medically refractory partial and secondarily generalized seizures.     

Acute and long-term safety of external trigeminal nerve stimulation for drug-resistant epilepsy

Trigeminal nerve stimulation (TNS) is a novel therapy for drug-resistant epilepsy. We report in detail the safety of external TNS (eTNS), focusing on acute and long-term heart rate and systolic and diastolic blood pressure in response to TNS from the pilot feasibility study. The data indicate that eTNS of the infraorbital and supraorbital branches of the trigeminal nerve is safe and well tolerated.     

Chronic high-frequency deep brain stimulation of the STN/SNr for progressive myoclonic epilepsy

Chronic high-frequency deep brain stimulation (DBS) may also be effective in patients with refractory epilepsy. A possible benefit has been postulated because of the connections that exist between the subthalamic nucleus (STN) and the superior colliculus. Individual case reports and pilot studies of successful DBS in different types of epilepsy have already been presented. Here, the case of a 39-year-old male with progressive myoclonic epilepsy is reported who remained severely impaired despite VNS and combined antiepileptic drug therapy. Bilateral DBS electrodes were implanted into the STN, followed by implantation of a neurostimulation system under general anesthesia. Adjustment and testing of the remaining contacts was done over several months postoperatively. Bilateral monopolar DBS reduced the intensity and frequency of seizures by 50%. The patient has so far been followed for 12 months. This is the first report of positive effects of DBS in progressive myoclonic epilepsy in an adult patient. A subsequent prospective study will have to investigate whether the STN or other target nuclei are most suitable for DBS in these types of epilepsy and which long-term results can be obtained.     

High and low frequency electrical stimulation in non-lesional temporal lobe epilepsy

In patients with pharmacologically intractable epilepsy who are not eligible for surgery, deep brain stimulation is currently under evaluation as an alternative treatment. Optimal stimulation parameters, including high (HFS) versus low frequency (LFS) stimulation, are not well defined. Here, we report the effects of HFS (130 pulses per second, pps) and LFS (5pps) of the principal epileptogenic focus, in three patients with non-lesional temporal lobe epilepsy. HFS, but not LFS, was associated with a reduction of the interictal discharges and absence of seizures. HFS may be beneficial in patients with non-lesional temporal lobe epilepsy who are not surgical candidates.     

Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus as adjunct treatment for refractory epilepsy

PURPOSE: We studied the efficacy and safety of bilateral subthalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS) for refractory partial-onset epilepsy in two cases. METHODS: This was an open treatment pilot study for subjects who had failed numerous medications and had seizure injuries. Seizure counts and adverse events were collected during a 3-4 month baseline, and for 26-32 months after DBS surgery, with AEDs held constant. RESULTS: Case 1, age 45, with bitemporal seizures, had about half the seizure frequency but still fell with injuries. Case 2, age 46, with left frontal encephalomalacia, had a frequency reduction of about one-third, but a more meaningful reduction of seizure severity and injuries. CONCLUSIONS: Subthalamic DBS partly reduced partial-onset seizures, but the quality of life was more affected by seizure-related injuries.     

Chronic anterior thalamus stimulation for intractable epilepsy

PURPOSE: A significant number of patients with epilepsy remain poorly controlled despite antiepileptic medication (AED) treatment and are not eligible for resective surgery. Novel therapeutic methods are required to decrease seizure burden in this population. Several observations have indicated that the anterior thalamic region plays an important role in the maintenance and propagation of seizures. We investigated neuromodulation of the anterior thalamus by using deep-brain stimulation (DBS) in patients with intractable seizures. METHODS: Five patients with medically refractory epilepsy underwent stereotactic placement of and received stimulation through bilateral DBS electrodes in the anterior thalamus. RESULTS: Treatment showed a statistically significant decrease in seizure frequency, with a mean reduction of 54% (mean follow-up, 15 months). Two of the patients had a seizure reduction of > or =75%. No adverse effects were observed after DBS electrode insertion or stimulation. Unexpectedly, the observed benefits did not differ between stimulation-on and stimulation-off periods. CONCLUSIONS: DBS of the anterior thalamus is a safe procedure and possibly effective in patients with medically resistant seizures.     

Deep brain stimulation in patients with refractory temporal lobe epilepsy

PURPOSE: This pilot study prospectively evaluated the efficacy of long-term deep brain stimulation (DBS) in medial temporal lobe (MTL) structures in patients with MTL epilepsy. METHODS: Twelve consecutive patients with refractory MTL epilepsy were included in this study. The protocol included invasive video-EEG monitoring for ictal-onset localization and evaluation for subsequent stimulation of the ictal-onset zone. Side effects and changes in seizure frequency were carefully monitored. RESULTS: Ten of 12 patients underwent long-term MTL DBS. Two of 12 patients underwent selective amygdalohippocampectomy. After mean follow-up of 31 months (range, 12-52 months), one of 10 stimulated patients are seizure free (>1 year), one of 10 patients had a >90% reduction in seizure frequency; five of 10 patients had a seizure-frequency reduction of > or =50%; two of 10 patients had a seizure-frequency reduction of 30-49%; and one of 10 patients was a nonresponder. None of the patients reported side effects. In one patient, MRI showed asymptomatic intracranial hemorrhages along the trajectory of the DBS electrodes. None of the patients showed changes in clinical neurological testing. Patients who underwent selective amygdalohippocampectomy are seizure-free (>1 year), AEDs are unchanged, and no side effects have occurred. CONCLUSIONS: This open pilot study demonstrates the potential efficacy of long-term DBS in MTL structures that should now be further confirmed by multicenter randomized controlled trials.     

Microendoscopic transventricular deep brain stimulation of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus as a safe treatment in intractable epilepsy: A feasibility study

IntroductionDeep brain stimulation (DBS) of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus (ANT) is proposed in patients with severe intractable epilepsy. When used, the transventricular approach increases the risk of bleeding due the anatomy around the entry point in the thalamus. To avoid such a complication, we used a transventricular microendoscopic technique.MethodsWe performed a retrospective study of nine adult patients who were surgically treated for refractory epilepsy between 2010 and 2019 by DBS of the anterior thalamic nucleus.ResultsEndoscopy provides a direct visual control of the entry point of the lead in the thalamus through the ventricle by avoiding ependymal vessels. No hemorrhage was recorded and accuracy was systematically checked by intraoperative stereotactic MRI. We reported a responder rate improvement in 88.9% of patients at 1 year and in 87.5% at 2 years. We showed a significant decrease in global seizure count per month one year after DBS (68.1%; P = 0.013) leading to an overall improvement in quality of life. No major adverse effect was recorded during the follow-up. ANT DBS showed a prominent significant effect with a decrease of the number of generalized seizures.ConclusionWe aimed at a better ANT/lead collimation using a vertical transventricular approach under microendoscopic monitoring. This technique permitted to demonstrate the safety and the accuracy of the procedure.     

Comparison of bipolar versus monopolar extraoperative electrical cortical stimulation mapping in patients with focal epilepsy

ObjectiveExtraoperative cortical stimulation (CS) for mapping of eloquent cortex in patients prior to epilepsy surgery is not standardized across centres. Two different techniques are in use, referred to as bipolar and monopolar CS. We compared the ability of bipolar versus monopolar CS to identify eloquent cortex and their safety profile in patients undergoing subdural EEG recordings.MethodsFive patients undergoing intracranial EEG recordings and extraoperative CS. Systematic comparison of stimulus parameters, clinical signs and afterdischarges of bipolar versus monopolar CS.ResultsBipolar CS requires less stimulation current but is more time consuming and more likely to produce afterdischarges when compared to monopolar CS. None of the stimulations elicited seizures. The area defined as eloquent by either bipolar or monopolar CS reveals only minor discordances, involving mainly the outer row and edge of the electrode array producing clinical signs with monopolar CS only. Qualitatively, bi- and monopolar CS reproduced similar movements and types of muscle contractions.ConclusionsBipolar and monopolar CS are safe procedures identifying similar cortical areas as eloquent, although monopolar cortical stimulation is less time consuming.SignificanceFindings advocate the use of monopolar CS in a clinical setting.     

Pilot study of trigeminal nerve stimulation (TNS) for epilepsy: a proof-of-concept trial

The safety and preliminary efficacy of trigeminal nerve stimulation (TNS) for epilepsy was evaluated in a pilot feasibility study of transcutaneous stimulation of the infraorbital and supraorbital branches of the trigeminal nerve. TNS was well tolerated. Four (57%) of seven subjects who completed >or=3 months experienced a >or=50% reduction in seizure frequency. The results of this pilot study support further investigation into the safety and efficacy of TNS for epilepsy.     

Controlling seizures is not controlling epilepsy: a parametric study of deep brain stimulation for epilepsy

Pharmacological inhibition and high-frequency stimulation (HFS) of the substantia nigra pars reticulata (SNr) suppress seizures in different animal models of epilepsy. The aim of the present study was to determine the optimal parameters of HFS to control spontaneous seizures in a genetic model of absence epilepsy in the rat. Single SNr stimulation that was bilateral, bipolar and monophasic at 60 Hz frequency and with 60-micros pulse width was optimal. However, when used for repeated stimulations, long-term suppression did not occur and even the number of seizures increased. A delay of at least 60 s between stimulations was necessary to be fully effective. Although single HFS of the SNr can be used to suppress ongoing seizures, repeated HFS is ineffective and could even aggravate seizures in our model. Thus investigations of accurate stimulation procedures are still needed.     

Chronic bilateral stimulation of the anterior thalamus of kainate-treated rats increases seizure frequency

PURPOSE: Electrical stimulation of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus (ANT) is receiving increased attention as a novel means of controlling intractable epilepsy, and has entered human clinical trial. Animal data supporting the anticonvulsant benefit of ANT stimulation, however, has been obtained from acute chemoconvulsant models of epilepsy rather than models of chronic epilepsy with spontaneous seizures. It is unknown whether ANT stimulation is effective in models of chronic epilepsy. METHODS: Bilateral ANT stimulation was evaluated in rats with chronic epilepsy following acute status epilepticus (SE) produced by systemic kainic acid (KA) administration. The evolution of epilepsy following KA SE and the effects of ANT stimulation were monitored by continuous video-EEG. RESULTS: Following KA SE, most rats have 2-8 seizures per day, and the average seizure rate increases over time, doubling over the course of 14 weeks. Behavioral seizure severity, after the initial development of epilepsy, remains stable. Seizure frequency during ANT stimulation was 2.5 times the baseline seizure frequency. In some cases stimulation triggered seizures were observed. The effects of stimulation were specific to the ANT. Stimulation applied to electrodes placed outside the ANT did not significantly worsen seizure frequency. CONCLUSIONS: ANT stimulation exacerbated seizure frequency in rats with chronic epilepsy following kainate status epilepticus.     

Epilepsia partialis continua responsive to neocortical electrical stimulation

Epilepsia partialis continua (EPC), defined as a syndrome of continuous focal jerking, is a rare form of focal status epilepticus that usually affects a distal limb, and when prolonged, can produce long‐lasting deficits in limb function. Substantial electrophysiologic evidence links the origin of EPC to the motor cortex; thus surgical resection carries the risk of significant handicap. We present two patients with focal, drug‐resistant EPC, who were admitted for intracranial video‐electroencephalography monitoring to elucidate the location of the epileptogenic focus and identification of eloquent motor cortex with functional mapping. In both cases, the focus resided at or near eloquent motor cortex and therefore precluded resective surgery. Chronic cortical stimulation delivered through subdural strips at the seizure focus (continuous stimulation at 60–130 Hz, 2–3 mA) resulted in >90% reduction in seizures and abolition of the EPC after a follow‐up of 22 months in both patients. Following permanent implantation of cortical stimulators, no adverse effects were noted. EPC restarted when intensity was reduced or batteries depleted. Battery replacement restored previous improvement. This two‐case report opens up avenues for the treatment of this debilitating condition.     

Anticonvulsant effects of transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) in the rat cortical ramp model of focal epilepsy

PURPOSE: Weak direct currents induce lasting alterations of cortical excitability in animals and humans, which are controlled by polarity, duration of stimulation, and current strength applied. To evaluate its anticonvulsant potential, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) was tested in a modified cortical ramp-stimulation model of focal epilepsy. METHODS: The threshold for localized seizure activity (TLS) was determined in freely moving rats by applying a single train of rising bipolar pulses through a unilateral epicranial electrode. After tDCS, TLS was determined repeatedly for 120 min at intervals of 15 min. The first group of animals received two sessions of cathodal tDCS at 100 microA, one for 30 and one for 60 min. A third session consisted of 60 min of anodal tDCS. A second group received cathodal tDCS at 200 microA for 15 and for 30 min, as well as anodal tDCS for 30 min. RESULTS: Sixty minutes of cathodal tDCS at 100 microA resulted in a TLS increase lasting for >or=2 h. When the intensity was increased to 200 microA, a similar lasting TLS elevation occurred after a stimulation of just 30-min duration. In contrast, anodal tDCS at identical stimulation durations and current strengths had no significant effect on TLS. CONCLUSIONS: The anticonvulsive effect induced by cathodal tDCS depends on stimulation duration and current strength and may be associated with the induction of alterations of cortical excitability that outlast the actual stimulation. The results lead to the reasonable assumption that cathodal tDCS could evolve as a therapeutic tool in drug-refractory partial epilepsy.     

Refractory epilepsy and deep brain stimulation

Up to one-third of all patients with epilepsy have epilepsy refractory to medical therapy. Surgical options include temporal lobectomy, focal neocortical resection, stereotactic lesioning and neurostimulation. Neurostimulatory options comprise vagal nerve stimulation, trigeminal nerve stimulation and deep brain stimulation (DBS). DBS enables structures in the brain to be stimulated electrically by an implanted pacemaker after a minimally invasive neurosurgical procedure and has become the therapy of choice for Parkinson’s disease refractory to or complicated by drug therapy. Here we review DBS for epilepsy, a powerful emerging treatment in the surgical armamentarium for drug refractory epilepsy, with a focus on extratemporal epilepsy.     

Deep brain stimulation of the anterior thalamus attenuates PTZ kindling with concomitant reduction of adenosine kinase expression in rats

BackgroundDeep brain stimulation (DBS) of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus (ANT) is an emerging therapy to provide seizure control in patients with refractory epilepsy, although its therapeutic mechanisms remain elusive.ObjectiveWe tested the hypothesis that ANT-DBS might interfere with the kindling process using three experimental groups: PTZ, DBS-ON and DBS-OFF.Methods79 male rats were used in two experiments and exposed to chemical kindling with pentylenetetrazole (PTZ, 30 mg/kg i.p.), delivered three times a week for a total of 18 kindling days (KD). These animals were divided into two sets of three groups: PTZ (n = 26), DBS-ON (n = 28) and DBS-OFF (n = 25). ANT-DBS (130 Hz, 90 μs, and 200 μA) was paired with PTZ injections, while DBS-OFF group, although implanted remained unstimulated. After KD 18, the first set of PTZ-treated animals and an additional group of 11 naïve rats were euthanized for brain extraction to study adenosine kinase (ADK) expression. To observe possible long-lasting effects of ANT stimulation, the second set of animals underwent a 1-week treatment and stimulation-free period after KD 18 before a final PTZ challenge.ResultsANT-DBS markedly attenuated kindling progression in the DBS-ON group, which developed seizure scores of 2.4 on KD 13, whereas equivalent seizure scores were reached in the DBS-OFF and PTZ groups as early as KD5 and KD6, respectively. The incidence of animals with generalized seizures following 3 consecutive PTZ injections was 94%, 74% and 21% in PTZ, DBS-OFF and DBS-ON groups, respectively. Seizure scores triggered by a PTZ challenge one week after cessation of stimulation revealed lasting suppression of seizure scores in the DBS-ON group (2.7 ± 0.2) compared to scores of 4.5 ± 0.1 for the PTZ group and 4.3 ± 0.1 for the DBS-OFF group (P = 0.0001). While ANT-DBS protected hippocampal cells, the expression of ADK was decreased in the DBS-ON group compared to both PTZ (P < 0.01) and naïve animals (P < 0.01).ConclusionsOur study demonstrates that ANT-DBS interferes with the kindling process and reduced seizure activity was maintained after a stimulation free period of one week. Our findings suggest that ANT-DBS might have additional therapeutic benefits to attenuate seizure progression in epilepsy.     

Electrical stimulation of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus for the treatment of intractable epilepsy

PURPOSE: Animal studies and sporadic case reports in human subjects have suggested that intermittent electrical stimulation of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus reduces seizure activity. We embarked on an open-label pilot study to determine initial safety and tolerability of bilateral stimulation of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus (ANT), to determine a range of appropriate stimulation parameters, and to begin to gather pilot efficacy data. METHODS: We report an open-label pilot study of intermittent electrical stimulation of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus in five patients (three men, two women; age range, 24-47 years), with follow-up between 6 and 36 months. All patients had intractable partial epilepsy. Four of the five patients also had secondarily generalized seizures. Stimulation was delivered by bilateral implantable, programmable devices by using an intermittent, relatively high-frequency protocol. Stimulation parameters were 100 cycles per second with charge-balanced alternating current; pulse width, 90 ms; and voltages ranging between 1.0 and 10.0 V. Seizure counts were monitored and compared with preimplantation baseline. RESULTS: Four of the five patients showed clinically and statistically significant improvement with respect to the severity of their seizures, specifically with respect to the frequency of secondarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures and complex partial seizures associated with falls. One patient showed a statistically significant reduction in total seizure frequency. No adverse events could clearly be attributed to stimulation. None of the patients could determine whether the stimulator was on or off at these parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Electrical stimulation of the ANT appears to be well tolerated. Preliminary evidence suggests clinical improvement in seizure control in this small group of intractable patients. Further controlled study of deep brain stimulation of the anterior nucleus is warranted.     

Seizure outcome after hippocampal deep brain stimulation in a prospective cohort of patients with refractory temporal lobe epilepsy

PurposeIn this study, we present the results obtained from a series of patients with refractory temporal lobe epilepsy (r-TLE) who underwent hippocampal deep brain stimulation (Hip-DBS).MethodsNine consecutive adult patients were studied. Low-frequency and high-frequency stimulation was carried out immediately after the insertion of each electrode. Chronic continuous high-frequency stimulation was used during treatment. The mean follow-up time was 30.1 months. The mean age of the patients was 37.2 years. The MRI scan was normal in three patients; four patients had bilateral mesial temporal sclerosis (MTS), and two had unilateral MTS.ResultsThe patients with unilateral MTS received unilateral implantation and experienced a 76% and an 80% reduction in seizure frequency after Hip-DBS. All patients with normal MRI scans were implanted bilaterally. Two of these patients received unilateral activation of the electrodes and experienced a 97% and an 80% reduction in seizure frequency; the third patient had bilateral activation of the device and was a non-responder. All patients with bilateral MTS were implanted bilaterally. Three of these patients received unilateral activation of the device and experienced a 66%, a 66% and a 100% reduction in seizure frequency after Hip-DBS; one patient had bilateral electrode activation, and was a non-responder. Whenever present, generalised tonic–clonic seizures disappeared completely after Hip-DBS.ConclusionsAlthough performed on a relatively small number of patients, Hip-DBS was safe and effective in our patients with r-TLE. Seven of the nine patients were considered responders. Hip-DBS might represent a useful therapeutic option in patients with refractory temporal lobe epilepsy who were not candidates for resective surgery or have had previous failed procedures.     

Nucleus accumbens stimulation in partial epilepsy—A randomized controlled case series

Neuromodulative treatment options are warranted in patients with difficult‐to‐treat epilepsy. However, acquisition of controlled data on deep brain stimulation has so far been achieved only for the centromedian and anterior thalamic nucleus. In a case series of four patients with intractable partial epilepsy, a randomized controlled cross‐over protocol was used to get insight into efficacy and safety of 3‐month nucleus accumbens stimulation. Seizure frequency, neurocognitive testing, “Liverpool Seizure Severity Score,” “Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory,” “Beck Depression Inventory,” and “Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview” were obtained at every visit. In a subsequent open‐label phase, nucleus accumbens stimulation responders underwent concomitant anterior thalamic nucleus stimulation, whereas nonresponders received solely thalamic stimulation. Under nucleus accumbens stimulation, three of four patients had ≥50% reduction in frequency of disabling seizures without further improvement with additional anterior thalamic nucleus stimulation. Patient‐reported outcome and neurocognitive testing remained unchanged. Accumbens stimulation is safe and seems to be a suitable option in intractable partial epilepsy. The current findings require substantiation by an adequately powered multicenter study.