The impact of organ failures and their relationship with outcome in intensive care: analysis of a prospective multicentre database of adult admissions

The database of a multicentre cohort study was analysed to determine the impact of intensive care unit (ICU) organ failures and their association with ICU mortality using sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA). A consecutive sample of 873 adult patients with a non-neurological diagnosis was identified. SOFA scores were measured every 24 h of ICU stay. The odds of ICU death within 7 days doubled (95% CI 1.3-2.9) for a 5-unit increase in total SOFA score at admission, p < 0.001. However ICU death after 7 days was not associated with total SOFA score at admission, p = 0.36. Compared to patients with a day 6 total SOFA score = 5, there was a 1-unit (95% CI 0.8-3.1) increase in the odds ratio of ICU death after 7 days with every 5-unit increase in SOFA score on day 6, p = 0.009. Continuous assessments of organ failures during an ICU admission are more useful than scores measured at admission to determine outcome and to compare ICUs.     

Progression of Organ Failure in Patients Approaching Brain Stem Death

We performed a retrospective cohort study to document the progression of organ dysfunction in 182 critically ill adult patients who subsequently met criteria for brain stem death (BSD). Patients were admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) of Mayo Medical Center, Rochester, MN, between January 1996 and December 2006. Daily sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores were used to assess the degree of organ dysfunction. Serial SOFA scores were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA). Mean (standard deviation, SD) SOFA score on the first ICU day was 8.9 (3.2). SOFA scores did not significantly change over the course of ICU stay. 67.6% of patients donated one or more organs after BSD was declared. The median time from ICU admission to declaration of BSD was 18.8 h (interquartile range 10.3–45.0), and in those who donated organs, the time from declaration of BSD to organ retrieval was 11.8 h (9.5–17.6). The fact that mean SOFA scores did not change significantly over time, even after BSD occurred, has implications for the timing of retrieval of organs for transplantation.     

Variation of the SOFA score and mortality in patients with severe burns: A cohort study

Multiple organ failure (MOF) is the leading cause of death in patients with burns requiring ICU admission. Quantifying the evolution of MOF, with the SOFA score, over the first few days after a severe burn may provide useful prognostic information. This retrospective cohort study aimed at evaluating the association between the evolution of the SOFA score between day 0 and day 3 and in-hospital mortality. All patients admitted for severe burns at the burn ICU of the Tours University Hospital between 2017 and 2020 and who stayed 3 days or more were included. Severe burns included: total body surface area burned (TBSA) ≥ 20 % or burns of any surface associated with one or more of the following items: (1) organ failure, (2) clinically significant smoke inhalation and/or cyanide poisoning, (3) severe preexisting comorbidities, (4) complex and specialized burn wound care. DeltaSOFA was defined as day 3 minus day 0 SOFA. One hundred and thirty-six patients were included. Median age was 52 years (38?70), median TBSA burned was 24 % (20?38), median day 0 SOFA was 2 (0?4) and median day 3 SOFA was 1 (0?5). In-hospital mortality was 10 %. There was a significant association between deltaSOFA and mortality that persisted after adjustment for age and TBSA (HR 1.37, 95 %CI 1.09–1.72, p < 0.01). Area under the receiver operating characteristics curve for the prediction of mortality by day 0 SOFA and deltaSOFA were 0.79 (95 %CI 0.69–0.89) and 0.83 (95 %CI 0.70–0.95) respectively. After exclusion of patients with TBSA burned< 15 %, deltaSOFA remained independently associated with mortality (HR 1.42 95 %CI 1.09–1.85, p < 0.01). In addition, SOFA variations allowed the identification of subgroups of patients with either very low or very high mortality. In patients with severe burns, SOFA score evolution between day 0 and day 3 may be useful for individualized medical and ethical decisions. Further multicenter studies are required to corroborate the present results.     

Comparison of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score with organ failure scores to predict hospital mortality

This study compared the performance of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score with two organ failure scores in predicting hospital mortality of critically ill patients. A total of 1311 consecutive adult patients in a tertiary 22-bed multidisciplinary intensive care unit (ICU) in Western Australia were considered. The APACHE II score had a better calibration and discrimination than the Max Sequential Organ Failure Score (Max SOFA) (area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve 0.858 vs 0.829), Admission SOFA (area under ROC 0.858 vs 0.791), and the first day or cumulative 5-day Royal Perth Hospital Intensive Care Unit (RPHICU) organ failure score (area under ROC 0.858 vs 0.822 and 0.819, respectively) in predicting hospital mortality. The APACHE II score predicted hospital mortality of critically ill patients better than the SOFA and RPHICU organ failure scores in our ICU.     

Neuroanesthesia and Intensive Care Limited ability of SOFA and MOD scores to discriminate outcome: a prospective evaluation in 1,436 patients

PURPOSE: The multiple organ dysfunction (MOD) score and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score are measures of organ dysfunction and have been validated based on the association of these scores with mortality. We sought to compare the performance of the SOFA and MOD scores in a large cohort of consecutive multisystem intensive care unit (ICU) patients. METHODS: Prospective automated daily measurements of MOD and SOFA scores were performed in 1,436 patients admitted to a multisystem ICU in the Calgary Health Region over a one-year period. Logistic regression modeling techniques were used to describe the association of SOFA and MODS with mortality. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were used to assess the model's discriminatory ability. RESULTS: For ICU and hospital mortality, there was very little practical difference between the SOFA and MOD scores in their ability to discriminate outcome as determined by the area under the ROC. However, compared to previous literature, the discriminatory ability of both scores in this population was weak. As well, the calibration of the models was poor for both scores. The SOFA cardiovascular component score performed better than the MOD cardiovascular component score in the discrimination of both ICU and hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS: SOFA and MOD scores had only a modest ability to discriminate between survivors and non-survivors. These results question the appropriateness of using organ dysfunction scores as a 'surrogate' for mortality in clinical trials and suggest further work is necessary to better understand the temporal relationship and course of organ failure with mortality.     

Extracorporeal life support in lung and heart–lung transplantation for pulmonary hypertension in adults

After bilateral lung and heart–lung transplantation in adults with pulmonary hypertension, hemodynamic and oxygenation deficiencies are life‐threatening complications that are increasingly managed with extracorporeal life support (ECLS). The primary aim of this retrospective study was to assess 30‐day and 1‐year survival rates in patients managed with vs without post‐operative venoarterial ECLS in 2008–2013. The secondary endpoints were the occurrence rates of nosocomial infection, bleeding, and acute renal failure. Of the 93 patients with pulmonary hypertension who received heart‐lung (n=29) or bilateral lung (n=64) transplants, 28 (30%) required ECLS a median of 0 [0–6] hours after surgery completion and for a median of 3.0 [2.0–8.5] days. Compared to ECLS patients, controls had higher survival at 30 days (95.0% vs 78.5%; P=.02) and 1 year (83% vs 64%; P=.005), fewer nosocomial infections (48% vs 79%; P=.0006), and fewer bleeding events (17% vs 43%; P=.008). The need for renal replacement therapy was not different between groups (11% vs 17%; P=.54). Venoarterial ECLS is effective in treating pulmonary graft dysfunction with hemodynamic failure after heart‐lung or bilateral lung. However, ECLS use was associated with higher rates of infection and bleeding.     

Vasoactive Inotropic Score compared to the sequential organ failure assessment cardiovascular score in intensive care

Background

The cardiovascular component of the sequential organ failure assessment (cvSOFA) score may be outdated because of changes in intensive care. Vasoactive Inotropic Score (VIS) represents the weighted sum of vasoactive and inotropic drugs. We investigated the association of VIS with mortality in the general intensive care unit (ICU) population and studied whether replacing cvSOFA with a VIS-based score improves the accuracy of the SOFA score as a predictor of mortality.

Methods

We studied the association of VIS during the first 24 h after ICU admission with 30-day mortality in a retrospective study on adult medical and non-cardiac emergency surgical patients admitted to Kuopio University Hospital ICU, Finland, in 2013–2019. We determined the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for the original SOFA and for SOFA_VISmax, where cvSOFA was replaced with maximum VIS (VIS_max) categories.

Results

Of 8079 patients, 1107 (13%) died within 30 days. Mortality increased with increasing VIS_max. AUROC was 0.813 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.800–0.825) for original SOFA and 0.822 (95% CI: 0.810–0.834) for SOFA_VISmax, p < .001.

Conclusion

Mortality increased consistently with increasing VIS_max. Replacing cvSOFA with VIS_max improved the predictive accuracy of the SOFA score.     

Sepsis and SOFA score: related outcome for critically ill renal patients

AIMS: To evaluate the influence of sepsis in critically ill patients with acute renal failure (ARF), and to analyze the value of the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score for assessing the morbidity and related mortality of these patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective observational study developed in a medical intensive care unit (ICU) of a tertiary care university hospital. Data were collected from January 1, 2001 - July 31, 2002. The inclusion criterion was either a creatinine plasma level > or = 2 mg/dl on ICU admission or increases > or = 30% from its initial value. Sepsis was evaluated at the time of study inclusion, and patients were distributed into 2 groups (septic and nonseptic patients). RESULTS: Two hundred patients with ARF were prospectively enrolled in the study (91 (45.5%) septic and 109 (54.5%) nonseptic patients). Median age was 68 years in septic patients and 72 in nonseptic ones while the percentage of males in both groups was 66% vs 69%, respectively. Septic patients showed more organ failures and more respiratory, cardiovascular and coagulation failures at the time of study admission as well as a worse mean SOFA score during the first 4 days after inclusion (p < 0.01). Mortality rate at the ICU was significantly higher in the septic group when compared to the nonseptic one (55% vs 19.3%, OR = 2.21 (1.65 - 2.97)). Using stepwise logistic regression, acute tubular necrosis and oliguria in septic patients as well as cardiovascular failure (evaluated by SOFA score) in nonseptic patients were identified as independent risk factors for mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Septic and nonseptic ICU patients with ARF have an increased risk of ICU mortality depending on the type of organ failure. Although SOFA score does not predict outcome, it is a useful tool to categorize these patients and to describe a sequence of complications in critically ill patients.     

Comparison of the severity of illness scoring systems for critically ill cirrhotic patients with renal failure

BACKGROUND: Mortality rates of cirrhotic patients with renal failure admitted to the medical intensive care unit (ICU) are high. End-stage liver disease is frequently complicated by disturbances of renal function. This investigation is aimed to compare the predicting ability of acute physiology, age, chronic health evaluation II and III (APACHE II and III), sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA), and Child-Pugh scoring systems, obtained on the first day of ICU admission, for hospital mortality in critically ill cirrhotic patients with renal failure. METHODS: Sixty-seven patients with liver cirrhosis and renal failure were admitted to ICU from April 2001-March 2002. Information considered necessary for computing the Child-Pugh, SOFA, APACHE II and APACHE III score on the first day of ICU admission was prospectively collected. RESULTS: The overall hospital mortality rate was 86.6%. Liver disease was most commonly attributed to hepatitis B viral infection. The development of renal failure was associated with a history of gastrointestinal bleeding. Goodness-of-fit was good for SOFA, APACHE II and APACHE III scores. The APACHE III and SOFA models reported good areas under receiver operating characteristic curve (0.878 +/- 0.050 and 0.868 +/- 0.051, respectively). CONCLUSION: Renal failure is common in critically ill patients with cirrhosis. The prognosis for cirrhotic patients with renal failure is poor. APACHE III and SOFA showed excellent discrimination power in this group of patients. They are superior to APACHE II and Child-Pugh scores in this homogenous group of patients.     

The impact of invasive fungal diseases on survival after lung transplantation

Arthurs SK, Eid AJ, Deziel PJ, Marshall WF, Cassivi SD, Walker RC, Razonable RR. The impact of invasive fungal diseases on survival after lung transplantation.
Clin Transplant 2010: 24: 341–348. © 2009 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract: Background: Recipients of lung transplants are at high risk of infectious complications. We investigated the epidemiology of infections after lung transplantation and determined their impact on survival. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent lung transplantation at Mayo Clinic (Rochester) during 1990–2005. Survival analyses were performed using Kaplan–Meier estimation and Cox proportional hazard modeling. Results: Sixty‐nine lung transplants were performed during the 16‐yr study period. The mean (±SD) patient age was 50.5 ± 9.7 yr; 45% were male. During the mean (±SD) follow‐up period of 1188 (±1288) d, the cumulative percentage of patients with infections were: bacteria (52%), cytomegalovirus (CMV) (49%), other viruses (32%), fungi (19%), mycobacteria (7%), and Pneumocystis jiroveci (1%). The median survival time after lung transplantation was 5.02 yr. Kaplan–Meier estimation of one‐, three‐, and five‐yr survival was 80%, 61%, and 50%, respectively. Overall, 37 (54%) patients died due to graft rejection and failure (35%), invasive fungal diseases (16%), post‐transplant lymphoproliferative disorder and other malignancies (14%), cardiovascular diseases (5%), CMV disease (3%), bacterial infection (3%), or other causes (24%). Survival analysis using Kaplan–Meier estimation showed that invasive fungal disease (Aspergillus sp., n = 9, Candida sp., n = 2, Alternaria sp., n = 1, Rhizopus sp., n = 1, and/or Mucor sp., n = 1) was significantly associated with mortality (p = 0.0104). After adjusting for age and graft rejection, invasive fungal disease remains a significant predictor of mortality (p = 0.0262). Conclusion: Invasive fungal disease is significantly associated with all‐cause mortality after lung transplantation. An aggressive antifungal preventive strategy may lead to improved survival after lung transplantation.     

Procalcitonin for early prediction of survival outcome in postoperative critically ill patients with severe sepsis

Background. Identification of postoperative patients at highrisk of dying early after intensive care unit (ICU) admissionthrough a fast and readily available parameter may help in determiningtherapeutic interventions or further diagnostic procedures thatcould have an impact on patients' outcome. The aim of our studywas to assess the utility of procalcitonin (PCT) and other readilyavailable parameters, as useful early (days 1–3) predictorsof mortality in postoperative patients diagnosed with severesepsis within 24 h preceding their operation. Methods. More than a period of 2 yr, subsets of 69 postoperativepatients admitted with severe sepsis and 890 non-septic ICUpatients were investigated. PCT, C-reactive protein (CRP) andsequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score were recordedover the duration of ICU stay. Results. PCT area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC)curve was 0.78 on day 3 and was highly predictive of fatal outcome(0.90) at day 6. Area under ROC curve of SOFA score was 0.85on day 3 and remained in this range until day 6. Area underROC curves on day 3 of CRP (0.61) was non-predictive and remainednon-predictive over the duration of ICU stay. Conclusions. PCT exhibited no discriminative power early afterICU admission for prediction of mortality in critically illpatients with severe sepsis, compared with a high predictivepower of SOFA score on day 3. However, using PCT could stillserve as a useful complementary comparator for prediction ofsurvival outcome using the SOFA score.     

Anandamide absorption by direct hemoperfusion with polymixin B-immobilized fiber improves the prognosis and organ failure assessment score in patients with sepsis

Purpose Direct hemoperfusion (DHP) with polymixin B-immobilized fiber (PMX) has been reported to be effective for patients with septic shock. The aim of this study was to clarify the mechanism of PMX-DHP effect on septic shock. Methods The following parameters were measured in septic shock patients who were treated with PMX-DHP: survival rate, sepsis-related organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE-II) score, and plasma concentrations of cannabinoids [anandamide (ANA) and 2-arachidonyl glyceride (2-AG)], cytokines [interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, IL-10], transforming growth factor β (TGF-β), and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP)]. The primary end point was mortality from all causes at day 28 after intensive care unit (ICU) admission or discharge. Results The survival rate of all patients at 28 days after ICU admission was 37.5% (9/24). The survival group showed significantly lower SOFA and APACHE-II scores than the nonsurvival group after PMX-DHP treatment (P = 0.008 and 0.028, respectively). The improved SOFA score group showed a better survival rate than the nonimproved SOFA score group (71.4% versus 23.5%, P = 0.028). Plasma ANA level significantly decreased after PMX-DHP treatment both in the improved SOFA score group and in the survival group. The level of 2-AG, however, showed no significant change in either group. Conclusion ANA, an intrinsic cannabinoid that induces hypotension in septic shock, is inferred to be the main mechanism of the PMX-DHP effect. Removal of ANA by PMX-DHP could be key to successful septic shock treatment.     

Application of modified sequential organ failure assessment score in children after cardiac surgery

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the usefulness of the modified sequential organ failure assessment (m/SOFA) score for assessing morbidity and mortality in pediatric patients after cardiac surgery. DESIGN: Analysis of a prospectively collected database. SETTING: Pediatric intensive care unit of a university-affiliated hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive pediatric patients (n = 142) undergoing cardiac surgery. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The m/SOFA score, consisting of 5 organ scores (maximum score of 20 points), was calculated on admission (initial) and at 12 and 36 hours postoperatively. An initial score of >5 points with an unchanged or upward postoperative trend predicted a higher postoperative mortality and a greater need for intensive care intervention. In neonates, sustained higher score >10 points predicted an outcome of death with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 87%. Given the higher mortality related to immature organ function and a greater complexity of heart defects, the application of the m/SOFA score, a less invasive and simple way to assess organ damage, is especially suitable in neonates. The m/SOFA score would be more appropriately assessed according to the congenital heart defect or surgical procedure because the types of cardiac defect after the surgical repair affect each organ score measurement. CONCLUSION: Application of the m/SOFA score in the early postoperative period, which reflects cumulative perioperative organ damage, would provide some direction to eventual outcomes of morbidity and mortality in patients with congenital heart defects undergoing surgery.     

Heart–lung vs. double‐lung transplantation for idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension

Patients with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (IPAH) have improved survival after heart–lung transplantation (HLT) and double‐lung transplantation (DLT). However, the optimal procedure for patients with IPAH undergoing transplantation remains unclear. We hypothesized that critically ill IPAH patients, defined by admission to the intensive care units (ICU), would demonstrate improved survival with HLT vs. DLT. All adult IPAH patients (>18 yr) in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) database, who underwent either HLT or DLT between 1987 and 2012, were included. Baseline characteristics, survival, and adjusted survival were compared between the HLT and DLT groups. Similar analyses were performed for the subgroups as defined by the recipients' hospitalization status. A total of 928 IPAH patients (667 DLT, 261 HLT) were included in this analysis. The HLT recipients were younger, more likely to be admitted to the ICU, and have had their transplant in previous eras. Overall, the adjusted survivals after HLT or DLT were similar. For recipients who were hospitalized in the ICU, DLT was associated with worse outcomes (HR 1.827; 95% CI 1.018–3.279). In IPAH patients, the overall survival after HLT or DLT is comparable. HLT may provide improved outcomes in critically ill IPAH patients admitted to the ICU at time of transplantation.     

Multiple organ failure and outcome of critically ill patients with haematological malignancy

BACKGROUND: The number of failing organs systems in ICU patients with haematological malignancy is associated with outcome. The objective of this study was to assess short and long-term survival in these patients with special reference to multiple organ failure reflected by the SOFA (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment) score. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of haematological patients admitted to the 10-bed intensive care unit (ICU) of a tertiary level academic teaching hospital from 1994 to 1998. Of 31 admitted patients with the diagnosis of haematological malignancy, the charts of 30 were available for analysis. RESULTS: Univariate logistic regression analysis of factors previously shown to influence survival revealed that only admission SOFA score and untreated status of haematological disease were significantly associated with survival (P < 0.05). ICU, 3-month and one-year survival rates were 57% (17/30), 23% (7/30) and 20% (6/30), respectively. If maximal SOFA score during the ICU stay was included in a multivariate model comprising treatment status and effect, admission day SOFA and APACHE II scores, mechanical ventilation, renal replacement therapy and neutropenia, the maximal SOFA score became the only independent variable. All patients with an admission SOFA score exceeding 11 died in hospital. Leave-one-out method revealed that admission SOFA scores and the status of haematological disease (untreated or not) correctly classified 83% (25 of 30) of patients to survivors or non-survivors. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple organ failure assessed as SOFA score on admission and status of disease were associated with outcome in critically ill patients with haematological malignancy.     

Sequential organ failure assessment score and comorbidity: valuable prognostic indicators in chronically critically ill patients

Chronically critically ill patients are defined as those who survive initial life-threatening, possibly reversible organ failure(s) but are unable to recover rapidly to a point at which they are fully independent of life support. Accordingly, these patients require mechanical ventilation and medical resources for a long time in an intensive care unit (ICU). The present study analysed demographic, clinical and survival data of chronically critically ill patients, to identify condition(s) related to poor prognosis. A total of 141 chronically critically ill patients were studied retrospectively over a two-year period (July 1, 2003 to June 30, 2005). Their mean lengths of stay in the ICU and in the hospital were 42.9+/-36.4 and 83.9+/-100.5 days respectively. ICU and six-month cumulative mortality rates were 42.6% and 75.9% respectively. Non-survivors had a significantly higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score than survivors on day 21 of ICU admission, as well as having significantly lower changes of SOFA scores between days three and 21. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the SOFA score on day 21 and the Charlson Comorbidity Index were the best predictor of survival for six months after hospital discharge. The SOFA score on day 21 and comorbidity in the ICU appears to be a valuable prognostic indicators in chronically critically ill patients.     

Defining an extended criteria donor lung: an empirical approach based on the Eurotransplant experience1

The aim of this study was to design and validate a lung donor score that reflects experts’ perceived risk of allograft failure. All lung donors reported to Eurotransplant from 1999 to 2007 [N = 6080] were used to create a lung donor score. Based on observed discard rates and using multivariate regression, points were assigned for six preprocurement donor variables. Donors reported in 2008 were used to validate the score [N = 751]. All the six factors significantly predicted discard; as an example, the following donor with points: age 55–59 years: 2; compromised history: 4; smoking: 2; shadow on chest X‐ray: 2; purulent secretion during bronchoscopy: 2; and Pao₂/Fio₂ ratio below 300 mmHg: 3. Discard rates for donors with a lung donor score of 6 points (class 1) was 18%, while 36% and 54% of the donors with a score of 7–8 (class 2) and 9 + (class 3) were discarded (P < 0.001), respectively. In addition, the donor lung score was significantly associated with 1‐year survival: class 1: 91%; class 2: 80%; and class 3: 72% (P = 0.017). The lung donor score accurately reflects the likelihood of organ acceptance and predicts patient mortality, and its application at time of donor reporting may facilitate donor risk assessment and patient selection.     

Sepsis is associated with lack of monocyte HLA-DR expression recovery without modulating T-cell reconstitution after lung transplantation

BackgroundImmunosuppressive strategy targets mainly adaptive immunity after solid organ transplantation. We assessed the influence of early post-operative sepsis on T cell and monocyte reconstitution in anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG)-treated lung transplant recipients.MethodsWe retrospectively included recipients who underwent a first lung transplant at our Lung Transplant Center (Marseille, France) between July 2011 and February 2013. Peripheral blood T-lymphocyte subset counts and monocyte HLA-DR (mHLA-DR) expression routinely performed by flow cytometry within 60 days post-transplant were analyzed. We compared the immune kinetics of patients who did or did not develop sepsis during the post-operative intensive care unit stay.ResultsAmong the 37 recipients included, 19 patients (51%) developed at least one episode of sepsis. At the ICU admission, septic recipients had higher SOFA score (9 [7.5–9] versus 6 [[4], [5], [6], [7]]), p = .01), higher primary graft dysfunction score (1.4 ± 1.4 versus 0.3 ± 0.7, p = .008) and more frequent use of ECMO (47% versus 0%, p = .003). Whereas both groups had similar T-lymphocytes reconstitution in the post-operative period, mHLA-DR reconstitution was dramatically affected in septic patients after day 14, median mHLA-DR expression at 2.3 MFI [1.3–3.5] in the septic versus 8.0 MFI [5.1–10.5] in the non-septic group, p = .02.ConclusionWe found that sepsis is negatively correlated with the mHLA-DR expression but not adaptive T cell immune reconstitution. This finding highlights the importance of immunomonitoring after lung transplantation and questions the strategy of a lower immunosuppression therapy in context of sepsis.     

Prediction of survival after 48-h of intensive care following open surgical repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm.

OBJECTIVE: To identify predictive factors for 30-day mortality after 48 h of maximal treatment in intensive care unit (ICU) after repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (RAAA). DESIGN: Retrospective study in the ICU of the university central hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 1999 and 2003, a total of 197 patients were admitted to emergency unit due to RAAA, and 185 of them underwent open surgical repair. A total of 138 patients survived at least 48-h and were included in a study to identify factors predictive of 30-day mortality by logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Thirty-day mortality of all RAAA patients was 46% (87/197) whereas the 30-day mortality for those alive at 48 h was 22% (31/138). Forward stepwise multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that only organ dysfunction by SOFA score (sequential organ failure assessment) at 48-h, preoperative Glasgow Aneurysm Score, and supra-renal clamping in operation were independent predictors of death. CONCLUSIONS: Degree of organ dysfunction by SOFA score was the best predictor of 30-day mortality in RAAA patients alive at 48-h after open surgical repair.     

肾移植术后肺部感染状态下免疫抑制剂的调整

目的 探讨肾移植术后肺部感染患者免疫抑制剂的应用与预后的关系.方法 对肾移植术后合并肺部感染的98例患者临床资料进行回顾性分析.将患者分为维持应用免疫抑制剂组(维持剂量组,45例)与免疫抑制剂减量或停用组(调整剂量组,53例).按与感染相关的器官衰竭估计评分(SOFA)标准,在肾移植术后肺部感染较重(SOFA≥12分)和感染较轻(SOFA＜12分)的情况下,分别分析两组患者的死亡率、感染恢复时间和排斥反应发生率的差异.结果 当SOFA≥12分时,调整剂量组死亡率和感染恢复时间明显低于维持剂量组(P＜0.05),而排斥反应发生率在两组之间的差异则无统计学意义(P＞0.05);当SOFA＜12分时,死亡率和感染恢复时间在两组之间差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05),但调整剂量组患者排斥反应发生率明显高于维持剂量组(P＜0.05).结论 在肾移植术后肺部感染较重(SOFA≥12分)时,减量和停用免疫抑制剂有利于降低患者的死亡率和缩短抗感染疗程;但感染较轻(SOFA＜12分)时,建议维持免疫抑制剂原剂量不变.