Evidence for priming and inhibitory effects of glucose on insulin secretion from isolated islets of langerhans

Summary Biphasic insulin secretion from perifused rat islets of Langerhans was affected in three ways by the islet glucose environment prior to stimulation, (i) The secretory response to glucose was diminished if the basal concentration of glucose in the medium was reduced from 5.5 to 2.7 mmol/l for 2 h prior to stimulation. First phase secretion was affected more than the second, (ii) Secretion was potentiated if islets had been previously exposed to a stimulatory concentration of glucose of 22.2 mmol/l. Again first phase secretion was particularly affected and there was a positive correlation between the magnitude of the secretory response and the duration of the initial stimulus, (iii) In contrast, both phases of secretion were proportionately reduced if islets had been previously exposed to stimulatory concentrations of glucose of 8.3 mmol/l.     

Monomethylated-adenines potentiate glucose-induced insulin production and secretion via inhibition of phosphodiesterase activity in rat pancreatic islets

Monomethyladenines have effects on DNA repair, G-protein-coupled receptor antagonism and autophagy. In islet ß-cells, 3-methyladenine (3-MA) has been implicated in DNA-repair and autophagy, but its mechanism of action is unclear. Here, the effect of monomethylated adenines was examined in rat islets. 3-MA, N6-methyladenine (N6-MA) and 9-methyladenine (9-MA), but not 1- or 7-monomethylated adenines, specifically potentiated glucose-induced insulin secretion (3-4 fold; p ≤ 0.05) and proinsulin biosynthesis (∼2-fold; p ≤ 0.05). Using 3-MA as a ‘model’ monomethyladenine, it was found that 3-MA augmented [cAMP]_i accumulation (2-3 fold; p ≤ 0.05) in islets within 5 minutes. The 3-, N6- and 9-MA also enhanced glucose-induced phosphorylation of the cAMP/protein kinase-A (PKA) substrate cAMP-response element binding protein (CREB). Treatment of islets with pertussis or cholera toxin indicated 3-MA mediated elevation of [cAMP]_i was not mediated via G-protein-coupled receptors. Also, 3-MA did not compete with 9-cyclopentyladenine (9-CPA) for adenylate cyclase inhibition, but did for the pan-inhibitor of phosphodiesterase (PDE), 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine (IBMX). Competitive inhibition experiments with PDE-isoform specific inhibitors suggested 3-MA to have a preference for PDE4 in islet ß-cells, but this was likely reflective of PDE4 being the most abundant PDE isoform in ß-cells. In vitro enzyme assays indicated that 3-, N6- and 9-MA were capable of inhibiting most PDE isoforms found in ß-cells. Thus, in addition to known inhibition of phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase (PI3′K)/m Target of Rapamycin (mTOR) signaling, 3-MA also acts as a pan-phosphodiesterase inhibitor in pancreatic ß-cells to elevate [cAMP]_i and then potentiate glucose-induced insulin secretion and production in parallel.     

Monomethylated-adenines potentiate glucose-induced insulin production and secretion via inhibition of phosphodiesterase activity in rat pancreatic islets

Monomethyladenines have effects on DNA repair, G-protein-coupled receptor antagonism and autophagy. In islet ß-cells, 3-methyladenine (3-MA) has been implicated in DNA-repair and autophagy, but its mechanism of action is unclear. Here, the effect of monomethylated adenines was examined in rat islets. 3-MA, N6-methyladenine (N6-MA) and 9-methyladenine (9-MA), but not 1- or 7-monomethylated adenines, specifically potentiated glucose-induced insulin secretion (3-4 fold; p ≤ 0.05) and proinsulin biosynthesis (～2-fold; p ≤ 0.05). Using 3-MA as a ‘model’ monomethyladenine, it was found that 3-MA augmented [cAMP]_i accumulation (2-3 fold; p ≤ 0.05) in islets within 5 minutes. The 3-, N6- and 9-MA also enhanced glucose-induced phosphorylation of the cAMP/protein kinase-A (PKA) substrate cAMP-response element binding protein (CREB). Treatment of islets with pertussis or cholera toxin indicated 3-MA mediated elevation of [cAMP]_i was not mediated via G-protein-coupled receptors. Also, 3-MA did not compete with 9-cyclopentyladenine (9-CPA) for adenylate cyclase inhibition, but did for the pan-inhibitor of phosphodiesterase (PDE), 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine (IBMX). Competitive inhibition experiments with PDE-isoform specific inhibitors suggested 3-MA to have a preference for PDE4 in islet ß-cells, but this was likely reflective of PDE4 being the most abundant PDE isoform in ß-cells. In vitro enzyme assays indicated that 3-, N6- and 9-MA were capable of inhibiting most PDE isoforms found in ß-cells. Thus, in addition to known inhibition of phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase (PI3′K)/m Target of Rapamycin (mTOR) signaling, 3-MA also acts as a pan-phosphodiesterase inhibitor in pancreatic ß-cells to elevate [cAMP]_i and then potentiate glucose-induced insulin secretion and production in parallel.     

GLP‐1 receptor activated insulin secretion from pancreatic β‐cells: mechanism and glucose dependence

The major goal in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus is to control the hyperglycaemia characteristic of the disease. However, treatment with common therapies such as insulin or insulinotrophic sulphonylureas (SU), while effective in reducing hyperglycaemia, may impose a greater risk of hypoglycaemia, as neither therapy is self‐regulated by ambient blood glucose concentrations. Hypoglycaemia has been associated with adverse physical and psychological outcomes and may contribute to negative cardiovascular events; hence minimization of hypoglycaemia risk is clinically advantageous. Stimulation of insulin secretion from pancreatic β‐cells by glucagon‐like peptide 1 receptor (GLP‐1R) agonists is known to be glucose‐dependent. GLP‐1R agonists potentiate glucose‐stimulated insulin secretion and have little or no activity on insulin secretion in the absence of elevated blood glucose concentrations. This ‘glucose‐regulated’ activity of GLP‐1R agonists makes them useful and potentially safer therapeutics for overall glucose control compared to non‐regulated therapies; hyperglycaemia can be reduced with minimal hypoglycaemia. While the inherent mechanism of action of GLP‐1R agonists mediates their glucose dependence, studies in rats suggest that SUs may uncouple this dependence. This hypothesis is supported by clinical studies showing that the majority of events of hypoglycaemia in patients treated with GLP‐1R agonists occur in patients treated with a concomitant SU. This review aims to discuss the current understanding of the mechanisms by which GLP‐1R signalling promotes insulin secretion from pancreatic β‐cells via a glucose‐dependent process.     

The balance between proinsulin biosynthesis and insulin secretion: where can imbalance lead?

Insulin is stored in pancreatic β-cells in β-granules. Whenever insulin is secreted in response to a nutrient secretagogue, there is a complementary increase in proinsulin biosynthesis to replenish intracellular insulin stores. This specific nutrient regulation of proinsulin biosynthesis is predominately regulated at the translational level. Recently, a highly conserved cis -element in the 5'-untranslated region (UTR) of preproinsulin mRNA, named ppIGE, has been identified that is required for specific translational regulation of proinsulin biosynthesis. This ppIGE is also found in the 5'-UTR of certain other translationally regulated β-granule protein mRNAs, including the proinsulin processing endopeptidases, PC1/3 and PC2. This provides a mechanism whereby proinsulin processing is adaptable to changes in proinsulin biosynthesis. However, relatively few β-granules undergo secretion, with most remaining in the storage pool for ∼5 days. Aged β-granules are retired by intracellular degradation mechanisms, either via crinophagy and/or autophagy, as another long-term means of maintaining β-granule stores at optimal levels. When a disconnection between insulin production and secretion arises, as may occur in type 2 diabetes, autophagy further increases to maintain β-granule numbers. However, if this increased autophagy becomes chronic, autophagia-mediated cell death occurs that could then contribute to β-cell loss in type 2 diabetes.     

Gastric bypass alters the dynamics and metabolic effects of insulin and proinsulin secretion.

AIMS: Hyperproinsulinaemia is associated with obesity and is a risk factor for Type 2 diabetes. We explored the dynamics of proinsulin and insulin and postprandial effects on glucose and lipids in subjects who had undergone gastric bypass (GBP) surgery compared with morbidly obese (MO) subjects and normal weight control subjects (NW). METHODS: Subjects free from diabetes were recruited: 10 previously MO subjects [body mass index (BMI) +/- sd, 34.8 +/- 6.2 kg/m2] who had undergone GBP surgery, 10 MO subjects (BMI 44 +/- 3.1 kg/m2) and 12 NW control subjects (BMI 23.2 +/- 2.4 kg/m2). After an overnight fast, a standard meal (2400 kJ) was ingested and glucose, proinsulin, insulin free fatty acids and triglycerides were determined up to 180 min. RESULTS: Fasting proinsulin was similar in the GBP group and NW control subjects, but threefold increased in MO subjects (P < 0.05). Postprandial AUC for glucose was similar in the three groups and AUC for proinsulin was high in MO, intermediate in the GBP group and lowest in NW control subjects (P for trend = 0.020). Postprandial proinsulin at 60 min was similar in the GBP group and MO subjects and twofold higher than in NW control subjects. Postprandial proinsulin at 180 min was normal in the GBP group, but fivefold increased in MO subjects (P = 0.008). Insulin increased rapidly at 30 min in the GBP group and was normal at 90 min, whereas insulin was still increased at 90-180 min in the MO subjects (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: MO subjects, free from diabetes, have elevated proinsulin concentrations in the fasting as well as the postprandial phase. After GBP surgery markedly lower fasting and postprandial proinsulin concentrations were observed, although BMI was higher compared with NW control subjects.     

Postprandial C‐peptide to glucose ratio as a predictor of β‐cell function and its usefulness for staged management of type 2 diabetes

Aims/Introduction

Type 2 diabetes is characterized by progressive deterioration of β‐cell function. Recently, it was suggested that the C‐peptide‐to‐glucose ratio after oral glucose ingestion is a better predictor of β‐cell mass than that during fasting. We investigated whether postprandial C‐peptide‐to‐glucose ratio (PCGR) reflects β‐cell function, and its clinical application for management of type 2 diabetes.

Materials and Methods

We carried out a two‐step retrospective study of 919 Korean participants with type 2 diabetes. In the first step, we evaluated the correlation of PCGR level with various markers for β‐cell function in newly diagnosed and drug‐naïve patients after a mixed meal test. In the second step, participants with well‐controlled diabetes (glycated hemoglobin <7%) were divided into four groups according to treatment modality (group I: insulin, group II: sulfonylurea and/or dipeptityl peptidase IV inhibitor, group III: metformin and/or thiazolidinedione and group IV: diet and exercise group).

Results

In the first step, PCGR was significantly correlated with various insulin secretory indices. Furthermore, PCGR showed better correlation with glycemic indices than homeostatic model assessment of β‐cell function (HOMA‐β). In the second step, the PCGR value significantly increased according to the following order: group I, II, III, and IV after adjusting for age, sex, body mass index and duration of diabetes. The cut‐off values of PCGR for separating each group were 1.457, 2.870 and 3.790, respectively (P < 0.001).

Conclusions

We suggest that PCGR might be a useful marker for β‐cell function and an ancillary parameter in the choice of antidiabetic medication in type 2 diabetes.     

Effects of C-peptide on isolated human pancreatic islet cells

BACKGROUND: Recent data have demonstrated that pro-insulin-derived C-peptide can affect the function of several different cell types. We hypothesized that C-peptide might have an influence on the function and survival of isolated human islets. METHODS: Islets were prepared by combining enzymatic digestion and density gradient centrifugation, and the effects of human C-peptide were evaluated acutely and after 24-h incubation. Insulin secretion, apoptosis, quantitative RT-PCR and western-blotting experiments were then performed. RESULTS: Glucose-stimulated insulin secretion was not affected by C-peptide and, accordingly, mRNA expression of glucose transporter 2 and glucokinase did not differ between islets pre-cultured or not with the hormone. However, apoptosis was significantly lower in islets exposed to C-peptide than in control islets. This was accompanied by a significant increase of mRNA and protein expression of Bcl2, an anti-apoptotic molecule, with no change in the expression of Bax, a pro-apoptotic molecule. CONCLUSION: These results show that in human islets pro-insulin C-peptide has no direct effects on insulin secretion, but it decreases islet cell apoptosis. A direct role of C-peptide on beta-cell mass regulation is therefore suggested.     

Postprandial serum C‐peptide value is the optimal index to identify patients with non‐obese type 2 diabetes who require multiple daily insulin injection: Analysis of C‐peptide values before and after short‐term intensive insulin therapy

Aims/Introduction

Type 2 diabetes is a progressive disease characterized by a yearly decline in insulin secretion; however, no definitive evidence exists showing the relationship between decreased insulin secretion and the need for insulin treatment. To determine the optimal insulin secretory index for identifying patients with non‐obese type 2 diabetes who require multiple daily insulin injection (MDI), we evaluated various serum C‐peptide immunoreactivity (CPR) values.

Materials and Methods

We near‐normalized blood glucose with intensive insulin therapy (IIT) over a 2‐week period in 291 patients with non‐obese type 2 diabetes, based on our treatment protocol. After improving hyperglycemia, we challenged with oral hypoglycemic agent (OHA), and according to the responsiveness to OHA, patients were classified into three therapy groups: OHA alone (n = 103), basal insulin plus OHA (basal insulin‐supported oral therapy [BOT]; n = 56) and MDI (n = 132). Glucagon‐loading CPR increment (ΔCPR), fasting CPR (FCPR), CPR 2 h after breakfast (CPR2h), the ratio of FCPR to FPG (CPI), CPI 2 h after breakfast (CPI2h) and secretory unit of islets in transplantation (SUIT) were submitted for the analyses. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and multiple logistic analyses for these CPR indices were carried out.

Results

Many CPR values were significantly lower in the MDI group compared with the OHA alone or BOT groups. ROC and multiple logistic analyses disclosed that post‐prandial CPR indices (CPR2h and CPI2h) were the most reliable CPR markers to identify patients requiring MDI.

Conclusions

Postprandial CPR level after breakfast is the most useful index for identifying patients with non‐obese type 2 diabetes who require MDI therapy.     

Liraglutide,a once‐daily human GLP‐1 analogue,improves pancreatic B‐cell function and arginine‐stimulated insulin secretion during hyperglycaemia in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus

Aims To assess the effect of liraglutide, a once‐daily human glucagon‐like peptide‐1 analogue on pancreatic B‐cell function. Methods Patients with Type 2 diabetes (n = 39) were randomized to treatment with 0.65, 1.25 or 1.9 mg/day liraglutide or placebo for 14 weeks. First‐ and second‐phase insulin release were measured by means of the insulin‐modified frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test. Arginine‐stimulated insulin secretion was measured during a hyperglycaemic clamp (20 mmol/l). Glucose effectiveness and insulin sensitivity were estimated by means of the insulin‐modified frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test. Results The two highest doses of liraglutide (1.25 and 1.9 mg/day) significantly increased first‐phase insulin secretion by 118 and 103%, respectively (P < 0.05). Second‐phase insulin secretion was significantly increased only in the 1.25 mg/day group vs. placebo. Arginine‐stimulated insulin secretion increased significantly at the two highest dose levels vs. placebo by 114 and 94%, respectively (P < 0.05). There was no significant treatment effect on glucose effectiveness or insulin sensitivity. Conclusions Fourteen weeks of treatment with liraglutide showed improvements in first‐ and second‐phase insulin secretion, together with improvements in arginine‐stimulated insulin secretion during hyperglycaemia.     

Hypophysis and function of pancreatic islets

Summary Insulin secretion and biosynthesis of proinsulin and insulin were determined in isolated pancreatic islets of hypophysectomized rats. Control rats were of both same age and weight. Hypophysectomy was performed either 13 or 5 weeks prior to the investigation, the weight of the animals being either 80 or 170 g. Biosynthesis of insulin was estimated from the amounts of radioactivity incorporated into proinsulin and insulin after incubation of isolated islets at 50 or 300 mg% glucose in the presence of³H-leucine for 3 h. Islet proteins were separated on Sephadex G 50 fine. — Hypophysectomy resulted in a significant decrease of both glucose stimulated secretion and biosynthesis of insulin. It was found that this reduction was 1) more significant when compared with controls of same age 2) more marked in rats which had been hypophysectomized 13 weeks before than in rats after an interval of 5 weeks and 3) less in rats which had been hypophysectomized at a weight of 170 g than in rats in whom pituitary ablation was performed at a weight of 80 g. At basal glucose concentrations, no significant changes of both secretion and biosynthesis of insulin were apparent. The relation of radioactivity incorporated into proinsulin and insulin was unchanged under all conditions. Insulin content of the isolated islets used was found within about the same range in all rats, apart from the animals which had been hypophysectomized 13 weeks before. In islets of these rats, a reduction to 84% was observed. — Our findings may be explained by reduced sensitivity of the pancreatic B-cell to glucose and a slower rate of insulin biosynthesis after hypophysectomy.Alexander von Humboldt-Fellow 1970–1972.H.S. was on leave from the 2nd Medical Clinic, University of Vienna, Austria.Supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Bonn-Bad Godesberg, SFB Ulm 87, Proj. 11.     

Adding insulin glargine vs. NPH insulin to metformin results in a more efficient postprandial β‐cell protection in individuals with type 2 diabetes

Aim: Postprandial release of intact proinsulin (IP) is an independent marker for β‐cell dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes. This open‐label, parallel‐group, two‐arm, pilot study compared the β‐cell protective effect of adding insulin glargine (GLA) vs. NPH insulin to ongoing metformin. Material and methods: Overall, 28 insulin‐naive type 2 diabetes subjects (mean ± SD age, 61.5 ± 6.7 years; diabetes duration, 9.8 ± 6.5 years; HbA1c, 7.1 ± 0.5%; BMI, 30.7 ± 4.3 kg/m²) treated with metformin and sulfonylurea were randomized to add once‐daily GLA or NPH at bedtime. At baseline and after 3 months, subjects received a standardized breakfast, lunch and dinner, with pre‐ and postprandial blood sampling to measure plasma IP, total insulin and blood glucose (BG). Results: Insulin dose after 3 months was comparable in both groups (GLA vs. NPH: 23.6 ± 13.4 vs. 23.3 ± 12.7; p = NS ). Both treatments significantly reduced fasting BG levels (GLA: 158 ± 19 to 121 ± 23 mg/dl; NPH: 156 ± 34 to 119 ± 29 mg/dl; both p < 0.01 vs. baseline). Fasting and postprandial BG levels did not differ between groups. IP levels decreased in both groups (p < 0.05 at all timepoints). Although IP release after breakfast did not differ between treatments, GLA induced a greater reduction in IP release after lunch (p = 0.08) and dinner (p = 0.04). Total plasma insulin levels did not differ between groups. Conclusions: Adding basal insulin to metformin reduces postprandial β‐cell load. While GLA and NPH had comparable effects at breakfast, GLA reduces β‐cell stress more effectively at dinner, and with a trend at lunch, most probably because of its longer lasting pharmacodynamic profile.     

Sulphonylurea receptor‐1, sulphonylureas and amplification of insulin secretion by Epac activation in β cells

Amplification of insulin secretion by cyclic AMP involves activation of protein kinase A (PKA) and Epac2 in pancreatic β cells. Recent hypotheses suggest that sulphonylurea receptor‐1 (SUR1), the regulatory subunit of ATP‐sensitive potassium channels, is implicated in Epac2 effects and that direct activation of Epac2 by hypoglycaemic sulphonylureas contributes to the stimulation of insulin secretion by these drugs. In the present experiments, using islets from Sur1KO mice, we show that dibutyryl‐cAMP and membrane‐permeant selective activators of Epac or PKA normally amplify insulin secretion in β cells lacking SUR1. In contrast to Epac activator, sulphonylureas (glibenclamide and tolbutamide) did not increase insulin secretion in Sur1KO islets, as would be expected if they were activating Epac2 directly. Furthermore, glibenclamide and tolbutamide did not augment the amplification of insulin secretion produced by Epac activator or dibutyryl‐cAMP. Collectively, the results show that SUR1 is dispensable for amplification of insulin secretion by Epac2 activation and that direct activation of Epac2 is unimportant for the action of therapeutic concentrations of sulphonylureas in β cells.     

Impact of insulin glargine and lixisenatide on β‐cell function in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A randomized open‐label study

It is known that β‐cell function can be enhanced by direct stimulation of insulin secretion or by induction of β‐cell rest, but whether both strategies can complement each other has not yet been examined. A total of 28 people with type 2 diabetes (glycated haemoglobin 7.8% ± 0.5%) were treated with either lixisenatide or titrated insulin glargine, followed by their combined administration, each over 4 weeks. First‐ and second‐phase insulin secretion during an intravenous glucose challenge were calculated. First‐ and second‐phase insulin secretion were not increased with glargine alone, but increased after addition of lixisenatide ( P < .001). Lixisenatide alone increased first‐ and second‐phase insulin secretion ( P < .01). Addition of insulin glargine tended to further increase first‐phase insulin secretion (P = .054), as well as insulin and C‐peptide concentrations ( P < .05). Second‐phase insulin secretion was not affected by the addition of glargine. The sequence of initiating lixisenatide or glargine had no effect on the final measures of glycaemia or insulin secretion. Thus, lixisenatide and, to a lesser extent, insulin glargine, increase glucose‐stimulated insulin secretion in an additive manner.     

Is the defect in pro‐hormone processing in Type 2 diabetes mellitus restricted to the β cell?

AIMS: To investigate whether the defect in pro-hormone processing in people with Type 2 diabetes mellitus is restricted to the pancreatic beta cell or whether there is evidence of a more generalized abnormality. METHODS: Ten Indian subcontinent Asian women with diet-controlled Type 2 diabetes were compared with a control group of nine non-diabetic Asian women who were matched for body mass index. All subjects underwent a standard 75 g oral glucose tolerance test during which plasma glucose, insulin, proinsulin and 32,33 split proinsulin were measured. Subjects in both groups then underwent an intravenous corticotrophin-releasing hormone (CRH) test with 100 microg human CRH. Plasma cortisol, adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH) and ACTH precursors were measured. RESULTS: Basal levels of insulin were lower in diabetic subjects (32.5 (12.5-52) pmol/l) than in the control group (42.2 (21.4-63.0) pmol/l); normalized geometric mean (95% confidence interval), P<0.05; as were the levels at 30 min (29.5 (3.7-55.3) pmol/l) and (34.4 (10.7-58.2) pmol/l), P<0.05. The levels at 60 min were (26.7 (6.4-47.0) pmol/l) in subjects with diabetes and (13.6 (-11.3-38.5) pmol/l) in controls, P<0.05 and at 90 min these were (43.4 (19.4-67.4) pmol/l) and (19.3 (-4.6-43.3) pmol/l), P<0.05, respectively, after the 75-g oral glucose load. The acute insulin response was markedly reduced in the subjects with diabetes (1.8 (0.60-3.1) pmol insulin/ mmol glucose), compared with the control group (31.4 (8.0-54) pmol/l insulin/mmol glucose), P<0.005. Intact proinsulin was much higher in the diabetic subjects (23.9 (10.1-37) pmol/1) than in the control group (7.2 (3.9-10) pmol/1), P<0.002, as was the percentage of proinsulin-like molecules (28 (14-42) and 12 (8-17)%), respectively, P<0.01. There were no differences between basal or stimulated levels of ACTH precursors, ACTH or cortisol between the diabetic subjects and the controls. CONCLUSIONS: The defect in insulin secretion in Indian subcontinent Asian women with Type 2 diabetes is similar to that described in other populations with an increased prevalence of Type 2 diabetes. The absence of any defect in the processing of cortisol precursors in the women with Type 2 diabetes suggests that they do not have a generalized defect of hormone processing.