Long‐term outcomes in African American kidney transplant recipients under contemporary immunosuppression: a four‐yr analysis of the Mycophenolic acid Observational REnal transplant (MORE) study

Mycophenolic acid Observational REnal transplant (MORE) was a prospective, observational study of de novo kidney transplant patients receiving mycophenolic acid (MPA). Four‐yr data on 904 patients receiving tacrolimus and enteric‐coated mycophenolate sodium (EC‐MPS) or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) were analyzed to evaluate immunosuppression and graft outcomes in African American (AA, n = 218) vs. non‐AA (n = 686) patients. Mean tacrolimus dose was higher in AA vs. non‐AA patients but mean tacrolimus trough concentration was similar. Use of the recommended MPA dose in AA patients decreased from 78.9% at baseline to 33.1% at year 3. More AA patients received the recommended MPA dose with EC‐MPS than MMF at month 6 (56.2% vs. 35.7%, p = 0.016) and month 36 (46.6% vs. 16.7%, p = 0.029), with no safety penalty. Significantly, more AA patients received corticosteroids than non‐AA patients. Biopsy‐proven acute rejection was higher in AA vs. non‐AA patients (18.9% vs. 10.7%, p = 0.003), as was graft loss (10.9% vs. 4.4%, p = 0.003); differences were confirmed by Cox regression analysis. Patient survival was similar. Estimated GFR was comparable in AA vs. non‐AA patients. Kidney allograft survival remains lower for AA vs. non‐AA recipients even under the current standard of care.     

Gastrointestinal side effects in liver transplant recipients taking enteric‐coated mycophenolate sodium vs. mycophenolate mofetil

In the setting of liver transplantation, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) may be used as an adjuvant therapy for immunosuppression to prevent graft rejection; however, its use may be limited due to severe gastrointestinal (GI) side effects. In contrast, enteric‐coated mycophenolate sodium (EC‐MPS) may be associated with less severe side effects and hence better tolerability. We compared the side effects of EC‐MPS to MMF in liver transplant patients in a de novo study (Study I—randomized, prospective, double‐blinded) and a conversion study (Study II). In both studies, the severity of GI symptoms was assessed at various time points using the Gastrointestinal Symptoms Rating Scale (GSRS) survey, a validated survey of GI symptoms (abdominal pain, reflux, indigestion, diarrhea, and constipation). In Study I, the symptoms of 30 recipients receiving EC‐MPS (n = 15) were compared to 15 recipients receiving MMF. A multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) of the total GSRS scores and symptom syndrome subscores revealed no significant difference (p > 0.05) between the two medications over time. A conversion study (Study II) with 29 participants, however, showed that over time, all GI symptoms improved significantly (p < 0.001) when the patients were treated with EC‐MPS instead of MMF.     

Randomized crossover study to assess the inter‐ and intrasubject variability of morning mycophenolic acid concentrations from enteric‐coated mycophenolate sodium and mycophenolate mofetil in stable renal transplant recipients

Tedesco‐Silva H, Felipe CR, Park SI, Pinheiro‐Machado PG, Garcia R, Slade A, Schmouder R, Medina‐Pestana JO. Randomized crossover study to assess the inter‐ and intrasubject variability of morning mycophenolic acid concentrations from enteric‐coated mycophenolate sodium and mycophenolate mofetil in stable renal transplant recipients.
Clin Transplant 2010: 24: E116–E123.
© 2009 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract: The delayed release of mycophenolic acid (MPA) from enteric‐coated mycophenolate sodium (EC‐MPS, myfortic^®) may have an impact on the variability of MPA trough (C_{0 h}) levels. A randomized, two‐period crossover study was performed in 24 maintenance renal transplants to evaluate the inter‐ and intrasubject variability of MPA predose levels from EC‐MPS and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF, CellCept^®), both in combination with cyclosporine. Patients received EC‐MPS (720 mg b.i.d.) and MMF (1000 mg b.i.d.) for a period of 21 d each. MPA plasma levels were measured over the final seven consecutive days at ?1, 0, 1, 2, and 3 h after the morning MPA dose. Intersubject coefficients of variation (%CV) for MPA troughs were 47.5% (95% CI, 34.1–80.3) and 54.4% (40.0–86.8) for EC‐MPS and MMF, respectively; intrasubject %CVs were 62.7% (55.1–72.9) and 42.8% (37.9–49.2). High MPA C_{0 h} levels >10 μg/mL were rarely observed with both EC‐MPS (1.8%) and MMF (0.6%). Mean MPA area under the curve (AUC)_{0–3 h} was comparable between treatments, while MPA C_{0 h} was on average 46% higher with EC‐MPS. In conclusion, predose MPA trough level monitoring appears of limited value during EC‐MPS and MMF therapy given the large intrasubject variability in MPA C_{0 h} levels with both treatments.     

Effect of mycophenolate mofetil on hematological side effects incidence in renal transplant recipients

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), an immunosuppressant administered after solid organ transplantation, is generally well tolerated; however, it frequently causes hematological toxicity. In this study, we aimed to assess the relation between the pharmacokinetic parameters of MMF metabolites (mycophenolic acid [MPA] and 7‐O‐MPA glucuronide [MPAG]) and the adverse effects on the hematopoietic system in renal transplant recipients. The four‐h pharmacokinetic profiles of MPA and MPAG were determined using the HPLC method for MMF‐treated patients (n = 61) among 106 renal transplant recipients (during the late post‐transplant period) participating in the study. Anemia was more frequently observed in the study group compared with the control group (30.7% vs. 20.0%) and although the difference was insignificant, plasma iron concentrations were significantly higher in patients treated with MMF (32.9 ± 9.4 μmol/L vs. 28.7 ± 9.4 μmol/L; p = 0.032). Iron supplementation was more frequently applied to patients with anemia (48.2%) compared with patients with hemoglobin within the norm (20.3%; p = 0.005). As all MPAG pharmacokinetic parameters correlated negatively with hemoglobin and hematocrit, and MPAG pharmacokinetic parameters were higher in patients with anemia, MPAG may be the predicting factor of MMF side effects. In renal transplant recipients, especially with deteriorated renal function, extensive iron supplementation may be ineffective as anemia was associated with declined renal function and was not caused by low iron concentration.     

Long‐term outcomes after cyclosporine or mycophenolate withdrawal in kidney transplantation – results from an aborted trial

Long‐term triple immunosuppressive therapy with cyclosporine (CsA), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and prednisolone may be excessively powerful for many transplant recipients. We compared withdrawal of either MMF or CsA in stable kidney transplants on triple immunosuppression. The study was a prospective, randomized, controlled 12‐months trial in stable kidney transplants. The patients who withdrew CsA were given MMF 2 g/d, and CsA troughs were between 75 and 125 ng/mL in MMF withdrawal. Planned inclusion was 298 patients. The study was prematurely aborted after inclusion of 39 patients. Acute rejection rates were 6/20 (30%) in the MMF group compared with 0/19 (0%) in the CsA group (p = 0.02). Time to acute rejections was 4.0–28.7 months after withdrawal. Trough concentrations of mycophenolic acid (MPA) and CsA showed therapeutic levels. The subjects have been observed for eight yr, and of the 28 patients remaining on randomized therapy, the MMF patients preserved graft function better than CsA patients. Death‐censored graft survival was 75% and 95% (p = 0.18) and patient survival was 70% and 68% (p = 0.99) in the MMF and CsA groups, respectively, at the end of long‐term follow‐up. CsA withdrawal was associated with a high rate of acute rejections. Initially, the treatment of acute rejections was successful. However, five of six lost their grafts in the long term.     

Effect of conversion from mycophenolate mofetil to enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium on maximum tolerated dose and gastrointestinal symptoms following kidney transplantation

Despite the potential tolerability advantage of enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS), no prospective, randomized trial has evaluated whether conversion from mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) to EC-MPS permits mycophenolic acid dose to be increased or gastrointestinal side-effects to be ameliorated. In a randomized, multicenter, open-label trial, kidney transplant recipients experiencing gastrointestinal side-effects either remained on MMF or switched to an equimolar dose of EC-MPS, adjusted 2 weeks subsequently to target the highest tolerated dose up to 1440 mg/day (EC-MPS) or 2000 mg/day (MMF). Patients were followed up to 12 weeks postrandomization. One hundred and thirty-four patients were randomized. The primary efficacy endpoint, the proportion of patients receiving a higher mycophenolic acid (MPA) dose at week 12 than at randomization, was significantly greater in the EC-MPS arm (32/68, 47.1%) than the MMF arm (10/61, 16.4%; P  < 0.001). At the final visit, 50.0% (34/68) of EC-MPS patients were receiving the maximum recommended dose versus 26.2% (16/61) of MMF patients ( P  = 0.007). Kidney transplant patients receiving reduced-dose MMF because of gastrointestinal side-effects can tolerate a significant increase in MPA dose after conversion to EC-MPS. Patient-reported gastrointestinal outcomes with higher doses of EC-MPS remained at least as good as in MMF-treated controls.     

Impact of dose reductions on efficacy outcome in heart transplant patients receiving enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium or mycophenolate mofetil at 12 months post-transplantation

Mycophenolic acid (MPA) dose reduction is associated with increased risk of rejection and graft loss in renal transplantation. This analysis investigated the impact of MPA dose changes with enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in de novo heart transplant recipients. In a 12-month, single-blind trial, 154 patients (EC-MPS, 78; MMF, 76) were randomized to either EC-MPS (1080 mg bid) or MMF (1500 mg bid) in combination with cyclosporine and steroids. The primary efficacy variable was the incidence of treatment failure, comprising a composite of biopsy-proven (BPAR) and treated acute rejection, graft loss or death. Significantly fewer patients receiving EC-MPS required > or =2 dose reductions than patients on MMF (26.9% vs. 42.1% of patients, p = 0.048). Accordingly, the average daily dose of EC-MPS as a percentage of the recommended dose was significantly higher than for MMF (88.4% vs. 79.0%, p = 0.016). Among patients requiring > or =1 dose reduction, the incidence of treated BPAR grade > or =3A was significantly lower with EC-MPS compared with MMF (23.4% vs. 44.0%, p = 0.032). These data suggest that EC-MPS-treated heart transplant patients are less likely to require multiple dose reductions than those on MMF which may be associated with a significantly lower risk of treated BPAR > or =3A.     

Enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium delivers bioequivalent MPA exposure compared with mycophenolate mofetil

Mycophenolic acid (MPA), the active moiety of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), is routinely used as an adjunct immunosuppressant therapy in renal transplantation. Although highly effective, MMF therapy is associated with significant gastrointestinal adverse effects. Enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) is an advanced formulation delivering MPA. The enteric coat dissolves at pH > 5 allowing for MPA delivery in the small intestine. A single-center, open-label, randomized, three-way crossover study of 24 stable Caucasian renal transplant patients receiving cyclosporine-based immunosuppression, compared the relative bioavailability of two EC-MPS doses (640 and 720 mg) with MMF (1000 mg). Both EC-MPS doses delivered bioequivalent mean MPA exposure (AUC(0-infinity)) compared with 1000 mg MMF: 60.7 microg h/mL for 640 mg EC-MPS, 66.5 microg h/mL for 720 mg EC-MPS, and 63.7 microg h/mL for 1000 mg MMF. Median t(max) was significantly delayed for both EC-MPS doses compared with MMF (2.0 h vs. 0.75 h, respectively; p < 0.01), consistent with a functional enteric coating of EC-MPS. Furthermore, both EC-MPS doses were bioequivalent to 1000 mg MMF for AUC and C(max) for mycophenolic acid glucuronide. All three treatments were well tolerated. The EC-MPS 720 mg dose most closely approximated the MPA exposure of 1000 mg MMF and was selected for subsequent phase III studies.     

Mycophenolic acid dose reductions result in poor long-term renal allograft survival: comparison between mycophenolate sodium and mycophenolate mofetil

Mycophenolate acid (MPA) therapy is associated with a decrease in acute rejection rates and excellent renal allograft survival. Unfortunately, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is associated with significant adverse effects (AE), which, in many cases, preclude full-dose therapy. Previously, lower MMF drug exposure was significantly associated with a greater risk of rejection. Patients who had a ≥50% dose reduction of MMF experienced a lower graft survival compared to those who tolerated full-dose MMF. Mycophenolate sodium (MPS) was designed to lessen MPA-associated AE. In this retrospective study, we studied the tolerability and long-term outcomes in renal transplant recipients (RTR) treated with MPS versus MMF. Four hundred forty-nine RTRs who received MPS or MMF for more than 3 months were classified into three groups: group 1: MMF-treated; group 2: MPS-treated; and group 3; patients who converted from MMF to MPS due to AE. Donor and recipient demographics as well as induction and maintenance immunosuppressive therapies were similar in all groups. Patient survival was not different in all groups. However, long-term graft survival was lower in patients whose dose of either MPS or MMF was reduced by ≥50%. Moreover, a ≥50% MPA dose reduction was associated with a higher rate of rejection compared to full dose (38% vs 21%, respectively, P < .01). Compared to patients treated initially with MMF, fewer MPS-treated recipients required dose reductions (65% vs 42%, respectively, P < .001). Furthermore, 38% of patients in group 3 tolerated full-dose MPS despite previous intolerance to MMF. Finally, the long-term graft survival was best in MPS-treated RTR and worst in those who converted from MMF to MPS due to AE. We conclude that MPS is better tolerated than MMF, which may explain the superior graft outcome in RTR who were treated with MPS from the onset.     

A critical analysis of racial difference with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) dosing,clinical outcomes and adverse effects in pediatric kidney transplant patients

Jensen CJ, Shrivastava S, Taber DJ, Weimert NA, Shatat IF, Orak J, Chavin KD, Baliga PK. A critical analysis of racial difference with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) dosing, clinical outcomes and adverse effects in pediatric kidney transplant patients.
Clin Transplant 2011: 25: 534–540. © 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract: There is paucity in the data examining the differences in mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) dosing and outcomes among pediatric kidney transplant recipients (PKTX) between races. The aims of this study were as follows (i) to assess whether higher doses of MMF are being utilized in African American (AA) PKTX (ii) to determine whether there is a correlation between MMF dose and outcomes between races, and (iii) to assess the adverse effects of MMF between races. This study analyzed 109 PKTX who received MMF between 7/99 and 5/08. Demographics were similar between groups. Fewer AAs received kidneys from living donors (18% vs. 44%), spent more time on dialysis (1.0 vs. 0.5 yr), and had more human leukocyte antigen mismatches (4 vs. 3). MMF doses among AA patients were higher throughout the study, with statistical differences at week 4, month 3, and month 18. AA patients had significantly higher acute rejection rates and trended toward poorer graft survival; infections, adverse events from MMF and post‐transplant lymphoproliferative disease tended to be lower in the AA patients. AA PKTX received higher MMF doses within the first three yr post‐transplant compared to their non‐AA counterparts, yet demonstrate significantly more acute rejection episodes. Importantly, MMF caused fewer adverse events in AA patients, despite these patients receiving higher doses.     

Enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium in de novo and maintenance kidney-pancreas transplant recipients

Ricart MJ, Oppenheimer F, Andrés A, Morales JM, Alonso Á, Fernández C, on behalf of the Epi‐trasplante Study, MIDATA Kidney–Pancreas Sub‐study Group. Enteric‐coated mycophenolate sodium in de novo and maintenance kidney–pancreas transplant recipients.
Clin Transplant 2011 DOI: 10.1111/j.1399‐0012.2011.01526.x.
© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract: Background: Our objective was to describe efficacy and safety of enteric‐coated mycophenolate sodium (EC‐MPS) in de novo and maintenance recipients of kidney–pancreas transplant in the clinical practice. Methods: Observational, multicentre, prospective, 12‐month study. Results: We included 24 de novo and 24 maintenance patients. EC‐MPS mean (±SD) doses at initiation in de novo patients were 1440 ± 0 vs. 1268 ± 263 mg/d at month 12 (M12). Patient and renal graft survival at one yr were 100%, and pancreatic graft survival was 83.3% (two losses owing to technical failure and two owing to rejection). In the maintenance cohort, EC‐MPS was introduced at a median (P25–P75) of 30 (6–71) months after transplant. Baseline doses were 585 ± 310 vs. 704 ± 243 mg/d at M12. In this group, a significant increase in creatinine clearance was observed (65 ± 22 at baseline vs. 74 ± 20 mL/min at M12, p = 0.011). Patient, renal, and pancreatic graft survival were 100%, 95.8%, and 100%, respectively (one kidney graft loss owing to rejection). During follow‐up, one patient from each group discontinued EC‐MPS. Conclusions: The efficacy of EC‐MPS in the clinical practice of kidney–pancreas transplantation is good, with high patient and grafts survival at 12 months, and good safety profile. The maintenance group displayed an improvement in renal function.     

Use of enteric‐coated mycophenolate sodium in liver transplant patients with intestinal intolerance caused by mycophenolate mofetil

Abstract: Background: Post‐transplant gastrointestinal (GI) side effects can impair a patient’s quality of life (QoL). This study investigates the improvement in GI side effects and related QoL changes in recipients of liver transplantation (OLT) after converting patients from mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) to enteric‐coated mycophenolate sodium (EC‐MPS). Methods: Thirty‐four patients who underwent OLT and suffered from GI intolerability were included in this study. Infectious causes of GI intolerability were excluded. QoL assessed by the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index was evaluated before conversion and at months 3, 6 and 12 post‐conversion. All patients received baseline immunosuppression of one calcineurin inhibitor, MMF, with or without steroids. Patients were converted from MMF to EC‐MPS on an equimolar basis. Paired t‐test was used to assess differences in mean score changes over time. Results: Conversion from MMF to EC‐MPS for GI intolerability post‐OLT shows statistically significant improvement in GI‐related QoL at 3, 6, and 12 months when compared to baseline assessments (p < 0.05 for total mean score); nonetheless, one‐third of patients discontinued EC‐MPS. No rejection episodes, deaths or graft loss were seen during the study period. Conclusion: OLT recipients who develop GI side effects caused by MMF can be safely converted to EC‐MPS with improvement to their QoL.     

Longitudinal growth on an everolimus‐ versus an MMF‐based steroid‐free immunosuppressive regimen in paediatric renal transplant recipients

Concerns have been raised that mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors in pediatric transplant recipients might interfere with longitudinal bone growth by inhibition of growth factor signaling and growth plate chondrocyte proliferation. We therefore undertook a prospective nested, case‐control study on longitudinal growth over 2 years in steroid‐free pediatric renal transplant recipients. Fourteen patients on a steroid‐free maintenance immunosuppressive regimen consisting of low‐dose everolimus (EVR) in conjunction with low‐dose cyclosporine (CsA) were compared to a matched cohort of 14 steroid‐free patients on a standard dose mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) regimen in conjunction with a standard dose calcineurin inhibitor (CNI). The mean change in height standard deviation (SD) score in the first study year was 0.31 ± 0.71 SD score in the EVR group compared to 0.31 ± 0.64 SD score in the MMF group (P = 0.20). For the entire study period of 2 years, the change in height SD score in the EVR group was 0.43 ± 0.81 SDS compared to 0.75 ± 0.85 SDS in the MMF group (P = 0.32). The percentage of prepubertal patients experiencing catch‐up growth, defined as an increase in height SD score ≥0.5 in 2 years, was similar in the EVR group (5/8, 65%) and the MMF group (6/8, 75%; P = 1.00). Longitudinal growth over 2 years in steroid‐free pediatric patients on low‐dose EVR and CsA is not different to that of a matched steroid‐free control group on an immunosuppressive regimen with standard‐dose CNI and MMF. Hence, low‐dose EVR does not appear to negatively impact short‐term growth in pediatric renal transplant recipients.     

Tacrolimus and mycophenolate regimen and subclinical tubulo‐interstitial inflammation in low immunological risk renal transplants

The aim was to evaluate the relationship between maintenance immunosuppression, subclinical tubulo‐interstitial inflammation and interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (IF/TA) in surveillance biopsies performed in low immunological risk renal transplants at two transplant centers. The Barcelona cohort consisted of 109 early and 66 late biopsies in patients receiving high tacrolimus (TAC‐C₀ target at 1‐year 6–10 ng/ml) and reduced MMF dose (500 mg bid at 1‐year). The Oslo cohort consisted of 262 early and 237 late biopsies performed in patients treated with low TAC‐C₀ (target 3–7 ng/ml) and standard MMF dose (750 mg bid). Subclinical inflammation, adjusted for confounders, was associated with low TAC‐C₀ in the early (OR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.61–0.92; P = 0.006) and late biopsies (OR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.50–0.95; P = 0.023) from Barcelona. In the Oslo cohort, it was associated with low MMF in early biopsies (OR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.83–0.98; P = 0.0101) and with low TAC‐C₀ in late biopsies (OR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.61–0.97; P = 0.0286). MMF dose was significantly reduced in Oslo between early and late biopsies. IF/TA was not associated with TAC‐C₀ or MMF dose in the multivariate analysis. Our data suggest that in TAC‐ and MMF‐based regimens, TAC‐C₀ levels are associated with subclinical inflammation in patients receiving reduced MMF dose.     

Everolimus Versus Mycophenolate Mofetil in Heart Transplantation: A Randomized,Multicenter Trial

In an open‐label, 24‐month trial, 721 de novo heart transplant recipients were randomized to everolimus 1.5 mg or 3.0 mg with reduced‐dose cyclosporine, or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) 3 g/day with standard‐dose cyclosporine (plus corticosteroids ± induction). Primary efficacy endpoint was the 12‐month composite incidence of biopsy‐proven acute rejection, acute rejection associated with hemodynamic compromise, graft loss/retransplant, death or loss to follow‐up. Everolimus 1.5 mg was noninferior to MMF for this endpoint at month 12 (35.1% vs. 33.6%; difference 1.5% [97.5% CI: –7.5%, 10.6%]) and month 24. Mortality to month 3 was higher with everolimus 1.5 mg versus MMF in patients receiving rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG) induction, mainly due to infection, but 24‐month mortality was similar (everolimus 1.5 mg 10.6% [30/282], MMF 9.2% [25/271]). Everolimus 3.0 mg was terminated prematurely due to higher mortality. The mean (SD) 12‐month increase in maximal intimal thickness was 0.03 (0.05) mm with everolimus 1.5 mg versus 0.07 (0.11) mm with MMF (p < 0.001). Everolimus 1.5 mg was inferior to MMF for renal function but comparable in patients achieving predefined reduced cyclosporine trough concentrations. Nonfatal serious adverse events were more frequent with everolimus 1.5 mg versus MMF. Everolimus 1.5 mg with reduced‐dose cyclosporine offers similar efficacy to MMF with standard‐dose cyclosporine and reduces intimal proliferation at 12 months in de novo heart transplant recipients.     

Questionnaire-based evaluation of gastrointestinal disorders in de novo renal-transplant patients receiving either mycophenolate mofetil or enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium.

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal (GI) disorders are one of the main adverse events in patients treated by mycophenolic acid (MPA). The aim of our prospective questionnaire-based study was to assess GI side-effects in de novo renal-transplant patients receiving either mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS). METHODS: Between January 2002 and April 2003, all patients receiving MPA with a functioning allograft at 1 month post-transplantation were enrolled in this study (n = 130). Ninety-three of them received MMF (group I), and 37 patients received EC-MPS (group II). Each month, every patient completed a questionnaire regarding GI disorders. RESULTS: During the first year post-transplantation, GI disorders occurred in 31 patients from the MMF group (33.3%) and 12 patients from the EC-MPS group (32.4%) (not significant). The incidence of upper GI disorders was also similar in both groups. Diarrhoea was observed in 18 patients (19.3%) from group I, and in five patients from group II (13.5%) (not significant). Its frequency and severity were similar in both groups. Weight loss was observed in three patients receiving MMF. Diarrhoea resolved spontaneously in 10 patients from group I and in all patients from group II. For the other eight patients in group I, the diarrhoea required MMF discontinuation in three patients and dose reduction in five patients. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, in this questionnaire-based evaluation, the incidence of GI disorders was similar in patients receiving either MMF or EC-MPS during the first year post-transplantation.     

Effects of mycophenolate mofetil introduction in liver transplant patients: results from an observational,non‐interventional,multicenter study (LOBSTER)

The benefits of calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)‐sparing regimens on renal function following liver transplantation (LT) have been demonstrated in clinical studies. This observational study assessed the real‐life effects of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) introduction in LT patients. Four hundred and ninety‐seven patients in whom MMF was introduced according to local standards or clinical considerations were entered. Patients were grouped by time between transplantation and start of MMF (start of study): Group A (n = 263): ≤6 d; Group B (n = 64): >6 d to ≤1 month; Group C (n = 74): >1 month to ≤1 yr; and Group D (n = 96): >1 yr. CNI sparing occurred in all groups, particularly in Groups C and D. Mean MMF doses at 12 months were 1202.7, 1363.5, 1504.7, and 1578.1 mg/d, respectively, in Groups A–D. At introduction of MMF, median glomerular filtration rate was 73.3, 81.7, 62.7, and 53.7 mL/min/1.73 m² in Groups A–D. At 12 months, this decreased to 66 mL/min/1.73 m² in Groups A and B, remained stable in Group C, and increased in Group D (64.8 mL/min/1.73 m²). Serious adverse drug reactions were lowest in Group D. In conclusion, MMF with a subsequent decrease in CNI was well tolerated and improved renal function even years after transplantation. A more forceful MMF dosing strategy with greater CNI sparing may further improve renal function.     

Tacrolimus plus mycophenolate mofetil vs. cyclosporine plus everolimus in deceased donor kidney transplant recipients: three‐yr results of a single‐center prospective clinical trial

We compared in kidney transplantation two immunosuppressive regimens: tacrolimus plus mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (TAC) and everolimus plus low‐dose cyclosporine (EVE). Sixty consecutive patients received TAC (30 patients) or EVE (30 patients) as immunosuppressive regimen; all subjects also received induction with basiliximab and corticosteroids. After three‐yr follow‐up, no difference was found in patient and graft survival (PTS: TAC: 97% vs. EVE: 100%; GS: TAC: 93% vs. EVE: 93%). The incidence of acute rejection was higher in the EVE group but the difference was not statistically significant (17% vs. 23%, p = ns). Patients in EVE showed higher serum cholesterol (205 ± 41 vs. 235 ± 41 mg/dL, p = 0.0012) and lower hemoglobin concentration (13.6 ± 1.4 vs. 12.4 ± 1.9, p = 0.01). Renal function was not significantly different in the two groups (3 Y creatinine: TAC 1.4 ± 0.8 vs. EVE 1.6 ± 0.8 mg/dL, p = ns). Treatment discontinuation was higher in the EVE group (TAC 17 vs. EVE 36%, p = ns). Our data show that in the middle‐term follow‐up, an immunosuppressive regimen with tacrolimus plus MMF has a similar efficacy and safety profile in comparison with the combination of low‐exposure cyclosporine plus everolimus. Further follow up could evidence the benefits related to the anti‐proliferative effects of everolimus.     

A clinical assessment of mycophenolate drug monitoring after liver transplantation

Hwang S, Lee S‐G, Ahn C‐S, Kim K‐H, Moon D‐B, Ha T‐Y, Song G‐W, Jung D‐H, Choi N‐K, Kim K‐W, Yu Y‐D, Park G‐C, Park P‐J, Choi Y‐I. A clinical assessment of mycophenolate drug monitoring after liver transplantation.
Clin Transplant 2010 DOI: 10.1111/j.1399‐0012.2009.01166.x
© 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract: Background: Recent findings have suggested the clinical utility of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in patients treated with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). Aim: To assess whether routine mycophenolic acid (MPA) TDM is beneficial and how to utilize it. Methods: A series of short‐term prospective studies on TDM for MPA and/or tacrolimus was performed at a large‐volume center. Results: The 673 adult liver transplants were divided into four groups based on immunosuppressive regimens as tacrolimus monotherapy (n = 369), tacrolimus–MMF therapy (n = 270), MMF‐minimal tacrolimus therapy (n = 17), and MMF monotherapy (n = 17). There was a significant difference of tacrolimus concentration between the groups receiving tacrolimus monotherapy and tacrolimus–MMF therapy during the first two yr (at two yr: 8.4 ± 2.7 vs. 6.3 ± 2.6 ng/mL; p ≤ 0.002). MMF‐minimal tacrolimus therapy and MMF monotherapy were applied after first three months and MPA levels ranged from 1.8 to 5.3 μg/mL. Correlation between MMF dosage and MPA concentration showed wide interindividual variations (n = 304, r² = 0.271, p < 0.001), in which r² was fluctuating from 0.056 to 0.213 according to the post‐transplant period over five yr; wide intraindividual variation was also observed during the first two months (n = 12, r² < 0.2, p > 0.195). About 10% of patients were classified as poor MMF absorber and excluded from MMF usage. Mean MPA level leading to successful MMF monotherapy or MMF‐minimal tacrolimus therapy was ≥1.0 μg/mL in 87% and >2.0 μg/mL in 56.5%. Conclusion: MPA TDM‐based MMF dosage adjustment enabled us to administer MMF more confidently than categorical dosing. MPA TDM appears to be a useful tool to cope with the wide pharmacokinetic variability of MMF after liver transplantation.     

Efficacy and safety of bleselumab in kidney transplant recipients: A phase 2, randomized,open‐label,noninferiority study

This study assessed the efficacy and safety of the anti‐CD40 monoclonal antibody bleselumab (ASKP1240) in de novo kidney transplant recipients over 36 months posttransplant. Transplant recipients were randomized (1:1:1) to standard of care (SoC: 0.1 mg/kg per day immediate‐release tacrolimus [IR‐TAC]; target minimum blood concentration [C_trough] 4‐11 ng/mL plus 1 g mycophenolate mofetil [MMF] twice daily) or bleselumab (200 mg on days 0/7/14/28/42/56/70/90, and monthly thereafter) plus either MMF or IR‐TAC (0.1 mg/kg per day; target C_trough 4‐11 ng/mL days 0‐30, then 2‐5 ng/mL). All received basiliximab induction (20 mg pretransplant and on days 3‐5 posttransplant) and corticosteroids. One hundred thirty‐eight transplant recipients received ≥1 dose of study drug (SoC [n = 48]; bleselumab + MMF [n = 46]; bleselumab + IR‐TAC [n = 44]). For the primary endpoint (incidence of biopsy‐proven acute rejection [BPAR] at 6 months), bleselumab + IR‐TAC was noninferior to SoC (difference 2.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI] ?8.1% to 13.8%), and bleselumab + MMF did not demonstrate noninferiority to SoC (difference 30.7%; 95% CI 15.2%‐46.2%). BPAR incidence slightly increased through month 36 in all groups, with bleselumab + IR‐TAC continuing to demonstrate noninferiority to SoC. Bleselumab had a favorable benefit–risk ratio. Most treatment‐emergent adverse events were as expected for kidney transplant recipients (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01780844).