Portal vein thrombosis and renal dysfunction: a national comparative study of liver transplant recipients for NAFLD versus alcoholic cirrhosis

The prevalence of portal vein thrombosis (PVT), renal dysfunction (RD), and simultaneous PVT/RD in liver transplantation (LT) is poorly understood. We analyzed the prevalence of PVT, RD, simultaneous PVT/RD, and the outcomes of adult recipients of LT for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and alcoholic liver disease (ALD) between 2006 and 2016 in the United States. We found that the prevalence of PVT (7.2% → 11.3%), RD (33.8% → 39.2%), and simultaneous PVT/RD (2.4% → 4.5%) has increased significantly over the study period (all P-values <0.05). NAFLD patients had a higher proportion of PVT (14.8% vs. 9.2%), RD (45.0% vs. 42.1%), and simultaneous PVT/RD (6.5% vs. 3.9%; all P-values <0.05). 90-day mortality was 3.8%, 6.3%, 6.8%, and 9.8% for PVT(−)/RD(−), PVT(−)/RD(+), PVT(+)/RD(−), and PVT(+)/RD(+) recipients, respectively (P < 0.01). 5-year survival was 82.1%, 75.5%, 74.8%, and 71.1% for PVT(−)/RD(−), PVT(−)/RD(+), PVT(+)/RD(−), and PVT(+)/RD(+) recipients, respectively (P < 0.05). In conclusion, the prevalence of PVT, RD, and simultaneous PVT/RD has increased among LT recipients, especially for those with NAFLD. The short- and long-term outcomes of recipients with PVT, RD, and simultaneous PVT/RD were inferior to patients without those risk factors irrespective of their indication for LT. No differences in patient outcomes were found between ALD and NAFLD recipients after stratification by risk factors.     

Risk factors for pneumonia caused by multidrug‐resistant Gram‐negative bacilli among liver recipients

Shi SH, Kong HS, Jia CK, Zhang WJ, Xu J, Wang WL, Shen Y, Zhang M, Zheng SS. Risk factors for pneumonia caused by multidrug‐resistant Gram‐negative bacilli among liver recipients.
Clin Transplant 2010: 24: 758–765. © 2009 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract: Pneumonia caused by multidrug‐resistant (MDR) Gram‐negative bacilli is associated with a higher mortality rate. The appropriate empiric therapy is based on the understanding of local etiology and MDR pattern. This study was to evaluate the spectrum of Gram‐negative bacilli, MDR rate, risk factors and mortality in 475 liver transplantation (LT) recipients. In the first six months after LT, the incidence of bacterial pneumonia was 21.3% (101/475). The overall infectious incidence during the first post‐transplant month was 80.2%. The most frequent pneumonia isolates were Enterobacteriaceae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus. Gram‐negative bacilli accounted for 69.6% of all pneumonia pathogens. Of the main 124 Gram‐negative bacilli isolates, MDR rate was 58.9%. Four risk factors for post‐LT pneumonia caused by MDR Gram‐negative bacilli were LT candidates with grade II–IV encephalopathy (OR 2.275, 95%CI 1.249–4.124, p = 0.006), prolonged duration of endotracheal intubation (OR 8.224, 95%CI 4.276–15.815, p = 0.013), tracheostomy (OR 4.929, 95%CI 1.099–18.308, p = 0.027) and post‐LT episode(s) of reoperations (OR 10.597, 95%CI 3.726–30.134, p < 0.001). MDR Gram‐negative bacterial pneumonia‐related mortality was significantly higher than that because of antibiotic‐susceptible bacilli (45.6% vs. 11.4%, p = 0.010). Our data suggest that pneumonia caused by MDR Gram‐negative bacilli after LT is common, and associated with the severity of underlying disease, prolonged mechanical ventilation and upper abdominal surgery.     

The impact of postreperfusion syndrome during liver transplantation using livers with significant macrosteatosis

The impact of postreperfusion syndrome (PRS) during liver transplantation (LT) using donor livers with significant macrosteatosis is largely unknown. Clinical outcomes of all patients undergoing LT with donor livers with moderate macrosteatosis (30%‐60%) (N = 96) between 2000 and 2017 were compared to propensity score matched cohorts of patients undergoing LT with donor livers with mild macrosteatosis (10%‐29%) (N = 96) and no steatosis (N = 96). Cardiac arrest at the time of reperfusion was seen in eight (8.3%) of the patients in the moderate macrosteatosis group compared to one (1.0%) of the patients in the mild macrosteatosis group (P = .02) and zero (0%) of the patients in the no steatosis group (P = .004). Patients in the moderate macrosteatosis group had a higher rate of PRS (37.5% vs 18.8%; P = .004), early allograft dysfunction (EAD) (76.4% vs 25.8%; P < .001), renal dysfunction requiring continuous renal replacement therapy following transplant (18.8% vs 8.3%; P = .03) and return to the OR within 30 days (24.0% vs 7.3%; P = .002), than the no steatosis group. Both long‐term patient (P = .30 and P = .08) and graft survival (P = .15 and P = .12) were not statistically when comparing the moderate macrosteatosis group to the mild macrosteatosis and no steatosis groups. Recipients of LT using livers with moderate macrosteatosis are at a significant increased risk of PRS. If patients are able to overcome the initial increased perioperative risk of using these donor livers, long‐term graft survival does not appear to be different than matched recipients receiving grafts with no steatosis.     

Sleeve gastrectomy prior to liver transplantation is superior to medical weight loss in reducing posttransplant metabolic complications

Strategies to optimize the management of obesity-related metabolic complications after liver transplantation (LT) are needed. We examined the effect of pre-LT sleeve gastrectomy (SG), as compared to medical weight loss (MWL), on post-LT outcomes. This is a cohort study of adults (≥18 years) with medically complicated obesity who were eligible for pre-LT SG and underwent LT from January 1, 2006 to June 1, 2016. Logistic regression models evaluated the association of SG on post-LT diabetes and hypertension, defined as new-onset or progressive disease post-LT. Cox regression models evaluated the association of SG on recurrent and de novo nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Among 70 LT recipients who were eligible for pre-LT SG, 14 (20%) underwent SG and 56 (80%) underwent MWL only. Mean follow-up was 5.2 years post-LT. The SG cohort sustained higher % total body weight loss at 3 years post-LT (28.9% vs. 5.4%, p < .001). In multivariable analyses, SG was associated with significantly lower risk of post-LT diabetes (OR 0.04, 95% CI 0.00–0.41, p = .01), hypertension (OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.04–0.67, p = .01), and recurrent and de novo NAFLD (HR 0.19, 95% CI 0.04–0.91, p = .04). When compared to MWL, SG resulted in sustained weight loss and significantly lower risk of diabetes, hypertension, and recurrent and de novo NAFLD post-LT.     

Clinical analysis of emergency liver transplantation: the role of living donor liver transplantation

The current liver allocation system requires reevaluation because of the advancements in peri‐transplantation care and surgical techniques. And, the role of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in an emergency has not been determined yet. Retrospective review of all patients undergoing emergency liver transplantation (LT) from January 2000 to June 2010 was conducted, and clinical data were analyzed. Of the total 505 LTs, 69 patients (13.7%) underwent an emergency LT. Of these, 54 patients (78.3%) underwent LDLT using a right liver, and 15 patients (21.7%) underwent deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT). The overall hospital mortality was 21.7% (15/69). The leading cause of death after transplantation was sepsis (60.0%). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that a model for end‐stage liver disease (MELD) >33 [hazard ratio (HR), 16.6; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.443–191.632; p = 0.024] and existence of pre‐transplantation intubation (HR, 18.2; 95% CI, 1.463–225.483; p = 0.024) were independent factors associated with poor survival after emergency LT. LDLT group and DDLT group showed no difference in hospital mortality (p = 0.854) and graft survival (p = 0.861). Thus, MELD score and respiratory insufficiency could be parameters predicting post‐transplant survival. And, LDLT using the right liver could be an appropriate alternative to DDLT in an emergency.     

Neurological events after liver transplantation: a single‐center experience

The aim of this study was to identify potential risk factors linked to neurologic events (NE) occurring after liver transplantation (LT) and use them to construct a model to predict such events. From odds ratios (OR) of risk factors, a scoring system was assessed using multivariate regression analysis. Forty‐one of 307 LT patients presented NE (13.3%), with prolonged hospital stay and decreased post‐LT survival. On multivariate analysis, factors associated with NE included: severe pre‐LT ascites OR 3.9 (1.80–8.41; P = 0.001), delta sodium ≥12 mEq/l OR 3.5 (1.36–8.67; P = 0.01), and post‐LT hypomagnesemia OR 2.9 (1.37–5.98; P = 0.005). Points were assigned depending on ORs as follows: ascites 4 points, and hypomagnesemia and delta sodium ≥12 mEq/l, 3 points each (score range = 0–10 points). ROC curve analysis suggested good discriminative power for the model, with a c‐statistic of 0.72 (CI 0.62–0.81; P < 0.0001), best performance for a cutoff value >3 points (71% sensitivity, 60% specificity). NE risk increased progressively from 6.4%, to 10.3%, 12.8%, 31.5% and 71.0% as scores rose from 0 to 3, 4, 6–7 and 10 cumulative points, respectively. The score described helps to identify patients potentially at risk for neurologic events, and its prevention would decrease morbidity and mortality after LT.     

Graft macrosteatosis and time of T‐tube removal as risk factors for biliary strictures after liver transplantation

Biliary strictures (BS) remain a significant problem following liver transplantation (LT), representing an important cause of morbidity. The purpose of this follow‐up study was to evaluate the incidence and risk factors associated with BS after LT. From 2001 to 2009, 244 consecutive patients underwent LT at our center. Multiple donor and recipient variables were collected for each patient. Exclusion criteria were hepaticojejunostomy, living‐donor LT, and follow‐up less than three months. We reviewed 177 patients, all of whom underwent an end‐to‐end choledochocholedochostomy and T‐tube placement. BS occurred in 23% of patients. Multivariate analysis revealed that graft macrovesicular steatosis >25% (p = 0.05, OR 3.38) and time of T‐tube removal less than six months (p = 0.02, OR 2.53) were independent risk factors for BS. Biliary strictures did not affect patient and graft survival. Donor macrovesicular steatosis represents a risk factor for BS, contributing to liver damage through a reduction in hepatic blood flow. Time of T‐tube removal seems to play a role in the development of BS, although it is unclear whether it represents the cause or the consequence of the development of BS.     

The impact of direct‐acting antiviral agents on liver and kidney transplant costs and outcomes

Direct‐acting antiviral medications (DAAs) have revolutionized care for hepatitis C positive (HCV+) liver (LT) and kidney (KT) transplant recipients. Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients registry data were integrated with national pharmaceutical claims (2007‐2016) to identify HCV treatments before January 2014 (pre‐DAA) and after (post‐DAA), stratified by donor (D) and recipient (R) serostatus and payer. Pre‐DAA, 18% of HCV+ LT recipients were treated within 3 years and without differences by donor serostatus or payer. Post‐DAA, only 6% of D‐/R+ recipients, 19.8% of D+/R+ recipients with public insurance, and 11.3% with private insurance were treated within 3 years (P < .0001). LT recipients treated for HCV pre‐DAA experienced higher rates of graft loss (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] _1.341.85_2.10, P < .0001) and death (aHR _1.471.68_1.91, P < .0001). Post‐DAA, HCV treatment was not associated with death (aHR _0.340.67_1.32, P = .25) or graft failure (aHR _0.320.64_1.26, P = .20) in D+R+ LT recipients. Treatment increased in D+R+ KT recipients (5.5% pre‐DAA vs 12.9% post‐DAA), but did not differ by payer status. DAAs reduced the risk of death after D+/R+ KT by 57% (_0.190.43_0.95, P = .04) and graft loss by 46% (_0.270.54_1.07, P = .08). HCV treatment with DAAs appears to improve HCV+ LT and KT outcomes; however, access to these medications appears limited in both LT and KT recipients.     

Outcome comparison of liver transplantation for hepatitis A‐related versus hepatitis B‐related acute liver failure in adult recipients

Hepatitis A virus (HAV) can cause acute liver failure (ALF). This study compares outcomes between liver transplantation (LT) for HAV‐related ALF (HAV‐ALF) and LT for hepatitis B virus (HBV)‐related ALF (HBV‐ALF). Of 3616 adult LTs performed between January 2005 and December 2014, we performed LT for HAV‐ALF recipients (n = 29) and LT for HBV‐ALF recipients (n = 34). HAV‐ALF group included 18 males and 11 females with mean age of 33.1 years. Graft survival rates in HAV‐ALF and HBV‐ALF were 65.5% and 88.0% (1 year) and 65.5% and 84.0% (5 years) (P = .048). Patient survival rates in HAV‐ALF and HBV‐ALF were 69.0% and 88.0% (1 year) and 69.0% and 84.0% (5 years) (P = .09). Multivariate analyses demonstrated that acute pancreatitis and HAV recurrence were independent risk factors of graft and patient survival. Post‐transplant outcome was poorer in patients with HAV‐ALF than in those with HBV‐ALF. This weakens LT's appropriateness in HAV‐ALF patients with pancreatitis. HAV recurrence after LT for HAV‐ALF is common and often fatal; thus, HAV recurrence should be monitored vigilantly, beginning early post‐transplant.     

Negative outcomes after liver transplantation in patients with alcoholic liver disease beyond the fifth post‐transplant year

Although up to 50% of patients with alcoholic liver disease (ALD) resume alcohol consumption after liver transplantation (LT), numerous studies indicate that long‐term results are not compromised. This study focused on evaluating the impact of ALD on outcomes up to and beyond the fifth year after LT. Among the 432 primary LT recipients included in this study, 97 underwent transplantation for ALD. Alcohol relapse rate at 10 yr was 33.5%, with younger recipient age being the only independent predictor (p = 0.019). Survival of patients with ALD (77.0%) was similar to those without (79.0%) up to the fifth post‐transplant year (p = 0.655) but worse during the five subsequent years among the five‐yr survivors (70.6% vs. 92.9%; p = 0.002). ALD was an independent risk factor for poorer survival beyond the fifth post‐transplant year (p = 0.049), but not earlier (p = 0.717). Conversely, alcohol relapse increased the risk of death only during the first five post‐transplant years (p = 0.039). There were no significant differences regarding graft failure incidence between ALD and non‐ALD recipients up to the fifth post‐transplant year (7.3% vs. 11.6%; p = 0.255) and beyond (12.9% vs. 5.0%; p = 0.126). In conclusion, pre‐transplant diagnosis of ALD yields negative effects on post‐transplant outcomes beyond the fifth post‐transplant year, not attributable to recidivism.     

Concomitant tacrolimus and ketorolac therapy in pediatric liver transplant recipients: Teaching old dogma new tricks

Nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), such as ketorolac, are effective analgesic medications, but concerns for nephrotoxicity have limited their role for pain control following pediatric liver transplantation (LT). Calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) and NSAIDs share a similar mechanism of nephrotoxicity, and concomitant administration is traditionally discouraged. A retrospective review of pediatric LT recipients was conducted between 1/1/2015 and 12/31/2019 at a single center. Patients were stratified based on receipt of ketorolac. The primary outcome was the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI). Secondary outcomes included serum creatinine, urine output, estimated glomerular filtration rate, bleeding incidence, oral morphine milligram equivalents, and hospital length of stay (LOS). The incidence of AKI was similar between the two groups with 25.8% of patients in the ketorolac group versus 29.2% of patients in the nonketorolac group (p = .475) meeting criteria in the first 10 days post‐transplant. Opioid requirements were less in the ketorolac group (p < .001), who also demonstrated shorter LOS compared with nonketorolac patients (p = .033). Concurrent CNI and ketorolac use did not result in an increased incidence of AKI in the early post‐LT period and resulted in significantly lower opioid requirements along with a decreased hospital LOS.     

Application of ischaemia-free liver transplantation improves prognosis of patients with steatotic donor livers – a retrospective study

The use of steatotic livers in liver transplantation (LT) is controversial. Ischaemia-free liver transplantation (IFLT) has obvious advantages for the recovery of allograft function. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of liver grafts with steatosis on outcome and the effect of IFLT with steatotic livers. 360 patients with LT were enrolled in this study. Perioperative characteristics and differences in outcome among different grades of steatotic groups, and between the IFLT and conventional LT (CLT) groups were analysed. Occurrence of early allograft dysfunction (EAD; 50%) and primary nonfunction (PNF; 20%) was significantly higher in the severe steatosis group (P < 0.001 and <0.001, respectively). Survival rate is significantly low in severe steatosis group (3-year: 60%, P = 0.0039). The IFLT group had a significantly lower occurrence of EAD than the CLT group (0% vs. 60%, P = 0.01). The level of postoperative peak AST, GGT and creatine were significantly lower in IFLT group (P = 0.009, 0.032 and 0.024, respectively). In multivariable analysis, IFLT and EAD were independent factors affecting postoperative survival. Severe steatotic livers lead to severe complications and poor outcomes in LT. IFLT has obvious advantages for reducing the rate of EAD in LT with steatotic livers.     

An objective definition for clinical suspicion of T‐cell‐mediated rejection after liver transplantation

A uniform definition of clinical suspicion of T‐cell‐mediated rejection (TCMR) in liver transplantation (LT) is needed to homogenize clinical decisions, especially within randomized trials. This multicenter study included a total of 470 primary LT recipients. The derivation cohort consisted of 142 patients who had clinically driven liver biopsies at any time after LT. The external validation cohort included 328 patients who underwent protocol biopsies at day 7‐10 after LT. The rates of moderate‐severe histological TCMR were 33.8% in the derivation cohort and 43.6% in the validation cohort. Independent predictors (ie, risk factors) of moderate‐severe TCMR in the derivation cohort were as follows: serum bilirubin >4 mg/dL (OR=5.83; P<.001), rising bilirubin within the 4 days prior to liver biopsy (OR=4.57; P=.003), and blood eosinophils count >0.1×10⁹/L (OR=3.81; P=.004). In the validation cohort, the number of risk factors was an independent predictor of moderate‐severe TCMR (OR=1.74; P=.001), after controlling for hepatitis C status. The number of risk factors paralleled the rates of moderate‐severe TCMR in the derivation and validation cohorts (P<.001 in both comparisons). In conclusion, increased serum bilirubin, rising bilirubin and eosinophilia are validated risk factors for moderate‐severe histological TCMR and could be used as objective criteria to select candidates for liver biopsy.     

Neutrophil and platelet‐to‐lymphocyte ratio as new predictors of dropout and recurrence after liver transplantation for hepatocellular cancer

There is increasing evidence that systemic inflammation markers like neutrophil (NLR) and platelet‐to‐lymphocyte ratios (PLR) may play a role in the outcome of hepatocellular cancer (HCC). Between January 1994 and March 2012, 181 patients with HCC were registered on the transplant waiting list: 35 (19.3%) patients dropped out during the waiting period and 146 (80.7%) patients underwent liver transplantation (LT). The median follow‐up of this patient cohort was 4.2 years (IQR: 1.8–8.3). On c‐statistics, the last NLR (AUROC = 67.4; P = 0.05) was the best predictor of dropout. The last PLR had an intermediate statistical ability (AUROC = 66.1; P = 0.07) to predict post‐LT tumor recurrence. Patients with a NLR value >5.4 had poor 5‐year intention‐to‐treat (ITT) survival rates (48.2 vs. 64.5%; P = 0.02). Conversely, PLR better stratified patients in relation to tumor‐free survival (TFS) (80.7 vs. 91.6%; P = 0.02). NLR is a good predictor for the risk of dropout, while PLR is a good predictor for the risk of post‐LT recurrence. Use of these markers, which are all available before LT, may represent an additional tool to refine the selection criteria of HCC liver recipients.     

Hepatic encephalopathy and post‐transplant hyponatremia predict early calcineurin inhibitor‐induced neurotoxicity after liver transplantation

Early calcineurin inhibitor‐induced neurotoxicity (ECIIN) is considered when neurological symptoms occur within 4 weeks after liver transplantation (LT). Risk factors and clinical outcome of ECIIN remain largely unknown. We sought to estimate the incidence, risk factors, and outcome of ECIIN after LT. We retrospectively evaluated 158 patients that underwent LT in a 2‐year period and received immunosuppression with calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) and prednisone. ECIIN was considered when moderate/severe neurological events (after excluding other etiologies) occurred within 4 weeks after LT and improved after modification of CNI. Demographic and clinical variables were analyzed as risk factors. Twenty‐eight (18%) patients developed ECIIN and the remaining 130 patients were analyzed as controls. History of pre‐LT hepatic encephalopathy (OR 3.16, 95% CI 1.29–7.75, P = 0.012), post‐LT hyponatremia (OR 3.34, 95% CI 1.38–9.85, P = 0.028), and surgical time >7 h (OR 2.62, 95% CI 1.07–6.41, P = 0.035) were independent factors for ECIIN. Acute graft rejection and infections were more frequent in the ECIIN group. In addition, length of stay was longer in ECIIN patients. In conclusion, pre‐LT hepatic encephalopathy, surgical time >7 h, and post‐LT hyponatremia are risk factors for ECIIN. Clinical complications and a longer hospital stay are associated with ECIIN development.     

Mesangial expansion at 5 years predicts death and death‐censored graft loss after renal transplantation

Death with a functioning graft and death‐censored renal allograft failure remain major problems for which effective preventative protocols are lacking. The retrospective cohort study aimed to determine whether histologic changes on a 5‐year surveillance kidney biopsy predict adverse outcomes after transplantation in recipients who had: both Type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m²) at the time of transplantation (T2DM/Obesity, n = 75); neither (No T2DM/No obesity, n = 78); No T2DM/Obesity (n = 41), and T2DM/No obesity (n = 47). On 5‐year biopsies, moderate‐to‐severe mesangial expansion was more common in the T2DM/Obesity group (Banff mm score ≥2 = 49.3%; Tervaert classification MS ≥ 2b = 26.7%) compared to the other groups (p < .001 for both scores). Risk factors included older age, higher BMI, HbA1C, and triglycerides at 1‐year post‐transplant. Moderate‐to‐severe mesangial expansion correlated with death with function (HR 1.74 (1.01, 2.98), p = .045 Banff and 1.89 (1.01, 3.51) p = .045 Tervaert) and with death‐censored graft loss (HR 3.2 (1.2, 8.8), p = .02 Banff and HR 3.8 (1.3, 11.5), p = .01 Tervaert) over a mean of 11.6 years of recipient follow‐up post‐transplant. These data suggest that mesangial expansion in recipients with T2DM and obesity may reflect systemic vascular injury and might be a novel biomarker to predict adverse outcomes post renal transplant.     

Lack of agreement for defining ‘clinical suspicion of rejection’ in liver transplantation: a model to select candidates for liver biopsy

The gold standard to diagnose acute cellular rejection (ACR) after liver transplantation (LT) is histological evaluation, but there is no consensus to select patients for liver biopsy. We aimed to evaluate the agreement among clinicians to select candidates for liver biopsy early after LT. From a protocol biopsy population (n = 690), we randomly selected 100 LT patients in whom the biopsy was taken 7–10 days after LT. The clinical information between LT and protocol biopsy was given to nine clinicians from three transplant centres who decided whether a liver biopsy was needed. The agreement among clinicians to select candidates for liver biopsy was poor: κ = 0.06–0.62, being κ < 0.40 in 76% of comparisons. The concordance between indication for liver biopsy and moderate–severe ACR in the protocol biopsy was κ < 0.30 in all cases. A multivariate model based on the product age‐by‐MELD (OR = 0.81; P = 0.013), delta eosinophils (OR = 1.5; P = 0.002) and mean tacrolimus trough concentrations <6 ng/ml within the prior 4 days (OR = 11.4; P = 0.047) had an AUROC = 0.84 to diagnose moderate–severe histological ACR. In conclusion, the agreement among clinicians to select patients for liver biopsy is very poor. If further validated the proposed model would provide an objective method to select candidates for liver biopsy after LT.     

Medication adherence and rejection rates in older vs younger adult liver transplant recipients

A growing number of older adults are undergoing liver transplantation (LT) in the United States. In some settings, it is thought that adherence declines with age. This retrospective study examined adherence and clinical outcomes in older vs younger adult LT recipients. Medical records of adult LT recipients from 2009 to 2012 from a single urban center were reviewed. The medication level variability index (MLVI) was the predefined primary outcome, with nonadherence defined as MLVI >2.5. The secondary outcome was incidence of rejection. Outcomes were evaluated starting 1 year post‐LT until 2015. A total of 42 of 248 patients were ≥65 at transplant. Older adults had significantly better adherence than younger ones (65%≥65 were adherent vs 42% younger adults; chi‐square two‐tailed P=.02). Survival analyses of rejection between age groups censored by time since transplant showed no difference among the four age groups (χ²=0.84, P=.84). Older age was not found to be a risk factor for reduced adherence or graft rejection in patients surviving at least 1 year post‐LT.     

Peri‐transplant lactate levels and delayed lactate clearance as predictive factors for poor outcomes after liver transplantation: A propensity score–matched study

This study aimed to investigate risk factors for early allograft dysfunction (EAD) and outcomes after liver transplantation (LT), focusing on peri‐transplant lactate clearance. We reviewed patients who underwent deceased donor LTs between 2011 and 2014. Lactate levels were checked at reperfusion and at the time of intensive care unit admission. Early lactate clearance was defined as reduction rate of lactate between the times of reperfusion and immediately after LT. Patients were categorized into the normal and delayed clearance groups. We used propensity score matching (PSM) between these two groups to estimate an impact of lactate clearance on incidence of EAD and graft survival. A total of 256 recipients were eligible for this study. Cut‐off value of lactate clearance to predict occurrence of EAD was determined at 0.2 mmol/L/h. After PSM, 120 patients in the normal clearance and 36 patients in the delayed clearance group were matched. Delayed lactate clearance was considered as an independent risk factor for EAD (Odds ratio 3.49, P = 0.002). The adjusted hazard of one‐year graft loss was significantly increased in the delayed clearance group (hazard ratio 6.69, P = 0.001). In conclusion, peri‐transplant delayed lactate clearance may be a strong predictor for EAD and poor liver graft outcomes.     

Autoimmunity after liver transplantation: a frequent event but a rare clinical problem

Autoantibodies are frequently detected after liver transplantation (LT), but their role is unclear. This study was designed to address three points: autoantibody prevalence pre‐LT and over time up to five yr after LT, identification of possible predictors of autoantibody formation, and correlation between autoantibodies and graft dysfunction. To these aims, we retrospectively evaluated 92 consecutive LT recipients for whom prospectively stored frozen sera were available for autoantibodies assessment by immunofluorescence. The overall autoantibody prevalence resulted significantly higher after LT than before LT (64% vs. 27%, p < 0.001 and 35.9% vs. 8.7%, p < 0.001 considering cutoff titer of ≥1:80 and ≥1:160, respectively). Recipient gender, donor age and gender, and indication for LT and main immunosuppressant (cyclosporine vs. tacrolimus) were not associated with the presence of autoantibodies. Patients with graft dysfunction had a significantly higher autoantibody prevalence irrespective of the etiology of liver injury as compared to those patients with persistently normal liver biochemistry, but only for cutoff titers ≥1:160 (p = 0.004). No cases of de novo autoimmune hepatitis were observed. In conclusion, autoantibodies are very frequently detected after LT also at high titers and their association with graft dysfunction likely represents an aspecific indicator of liver injury.