General genetic and acquired risk factors,and prevalence of peri‐implant diseases – Consensus report of working group 1

For decades, oral implants have been used successfully for the replacement of missing teeth. Nevertheless, peri‐implant diseases have become an increasingly important issue in daily practice. In this working group, the prevalence of peri‐implant mucositis and peri‐implantitis, as well as different general risk factors and their impact on the onset and progression of peri‐implant diseases, were discussed based on reviews reflecting the current state of evidence. The influence of smoking on the peri‐implant bone‐healing process and its association with peri‐implantitis has been explored in the current literature, demonstrating that smoking is an important risk indicator for the development of peri‐implantitis and implant loss. Compared with non‐smokers, smokers have a higher potential for pathological peri‐implant bone loss, which is also influenced by poor oral hygiene. Despite the fact that a growing number of genetic polymorphisms have been identified and related to periodontal diseases, there are still no genetic patterns that could act as adjuncts to clinical diagnostics in order to identify patients at higher risk of peri‐implant diseases. Long‐term medications, such as bisphosphonate therapy (> 3 years), may have an impact on implant loss. A higher incidence of implant failure was reported in patients using selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in anti‐depression therapy. Alcoholism (defined as more than 5 units a day) has been associated with implant loss in retrospective and case–control studies, as well as in animal studies.     

Early intervention of peri‐implantitis and periodontitis using a mouse model

1 Background

Peri‐implantitis is an inflammatory response to bacterial biofilm resulting in bone loss and can ultimately lead to implant failure. Because of the lack of predictable treatments available, a thorough understanding of peri‐implantitis's pathogenesis is essential. The objective of this study is to evaluate and compare the response of acute induced peri‐implantitis and periodontitis lesions after insult removal.

2 Methods

Implants were placed in one‐month‐old C57BL/6J male mice eight weeks post extraction of their left maxillary molars. Once osseointegrated, ligatures were placed around the implants and contralateral second molars of the experimental groups. Controls did not receive ligatures. After one week, half of the ligatures were removed, creating the ligature‐retained and ligature‐removed groups. Mice were sacrificed at two time points, 5 and 14 days, from ligature removal. The specimens were analyzed via micro‐computed tomography and histology.

3 Results

By 5 and 14 days after ligature removal, the periodontitis group experienced significant bone gain, whereas the peri‐implantitis group did not. Histologically, all implant groups exhibited higher levels of cellular infiltrate than any of the tooth groups. Osteoclast numbers increased in peri‐implantitis and periodontitis ligature‐retained groups and decreased following insult removal. Collagen was overall more disorganized in peri‐implantitis than periodontitis for all groups. Peri‐implantitis experimental groups revealed greater matrix metalloproteinase‐8 and NF‐kB levels than periodontitis.

4 Conclusions

Implants respond slower and less favorably to insult removal than teeth. Future research is needed to characterize detailed peri‐implantitis disease pathophysiology.     

Crestal Bone Changes at Teeth and Implants in Periodontally Healthy and Periodontally Compromised Patients. A 10‐Year Comparative Case‐Series Study

Background: Limited data exist on the longitudinal crestal bone changes around teeth compared with implants in partially edentulous patients. This study sought to compare the 10‐year radiographic crestal bone changes (bone level [BL]) around teeth and implants in periodontally compromised (PCPs) and periodontally healthy (PHPs) patients. Methods: A total of 120 patients were evaluated for the radiographic crestal BL around dental implants and adjacent teeth at time of implant crown insertion and at the 10‐year follow‐up. Sixty patients had a previous history of periodontitis (PCPs), and the remaining 60 were PHPs. In each category (PCP and PHP), two different implant systems were used. The mean BL change at the implant and at the adjacent tooth at the interproximal area was calculated by subtracting the radiographic crestal BL at the time of crown cementation from the radiographic crestal BL at the 10‐year follow‐up. Results: At 10 years after therapy, the survival rate ranged from 80% to 95% for subgroups for implants, whereas it was 100% for the adjacent teeth. In all eight different patient categories evaluated, teeth demonstrated a significantly more stable radiographic BL compared with adjacent dental implants (teeth BL, 0.44 ± 0.23 mm; implant BL, 2.28 ± 0.72 mm; P <0.05). Radiographic BL changes around teeth seemed not to be influenced by the presence or absence of advanced bone loss (≥3 mm) at the adjacent implants. Conclusions: Natural teeth yielded better long‐term results with respect to survival rate and marginal BL changes compared with dental implants. Moreover, these findings also extend to teeth with an initial reduced periodontal attachment level, provided adequate periodontal treatment and maintenance are performed. As a consequence, the decision of tooth extraction attributable to periodontal reasons in favor of a dental implant should be carefully considered in partially edentulous patients.