Uniportal versus biportal video-assisted thoracoscopic sympathectomy for palmar hyperhidrosis

Background Video-assisted thoracoscopic sympathectomy had replaced open surgery. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of using a single port and two pods to perform video-assisted thoracoscopic sympathectomy for palmar hyperhidrosis. Methods Between April 2006 and February 2008, 20 cases underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic sympathectomy through one port (uniportal group) and 25 cases through two pods (biportal group). The variables including the operating time, hospital stay, pain scores, postoperative complications, incidence of symptom recurrence and patient satisfaction were compared. The mean postoperative follow-up period was 11.5 months (range, 3-25 months). Results The hands of all patients were warm and dry after operation. No conversion to open surgery was necessary, and no operative mortality was recorded in either group. The mean inpatient pain scores were significantly higher in the biportal group (1.2±0.6) than that in the uniportal group (0.8±0.5, p=0.025). For the first three weeks after operation, four out of 20 (20%) patients in the uniportal group constantly suffered from mild or moderate residual pain while eight out of 25 (32%) cases in the biportal group (P=0.366). Among them, two cases in the uniportal group and five cases in the biportal group need to take analgesics. Our mean operative time (bilateral sympathectomy) in the uniportal group ((39.5±10.0) minutes) was shorter than that in biportal group ((49.7±10.6) minutes, P=0.02). There were no significant differences between two groups in terms of the mean hospital stay, compensatory sweating, and patient satisfaction. Two patients in the biportal group and three in the uniportal group experienced a unilateral pneumothorax. None of them required chest drainage. No patient experienced Homer's syndrome, and no recurrent symptoms were observed in either groupsConclusions Both uniportal and biportal video-assisted thoracoscopic sympathectomy are effective, safe, and minimally invasive for palmar hyperhidrosis. Comparing with the biportal approach, the uniportal approach causes lesspostoperative pain and less operative time, and is a more reasonable procedure in treatment of palmar hyperhidrosis.     

Uniportal versus biportal video-assisted thoracoscopic sympathectomy for palmar hyperhidrosis

Background Video-assisted thoracoscopic sympathectomy had replaced open surgery. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of using a single port and two pods to perform video-assisted thoracoscopic sympathectomy for palmar hyperhidrosis. Methods Between April 2006 and February 2008, 20 cases underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic sympathectomy through one port (uniportal group) and 25 cases through two pods (biportal group). The variables including the operating time, hospital stay, pain scores, postoperative complications, incidence of symptom recurrence and patient satisfaction were compared. The mean postoperative follow-up period was 11.5 months (range, 3-25 months). Results The hands of all patients were warm and dry after operation. No conversion to open surgery was necessary, and no operative mortality was recorded in either group. The mean inpatient pain scores were significantly higher in the biportal group (1.2±0.6) than that in the uniportal group (0.8±0.5, p=0.025). For the first three weeks after operation, four out of 20 (20%) patients in the uniportal group constantly suffered from mild or moderate residual pain while eight out of 25 (32%) cases in the biportal group (P=0.366). Among them, two cases in the uniportal group and five cases in the biportal group need to take analgesics. Our mean operative time (bilateral sympathectomy) in the uniportal group ((39.5±10.0) minutes) was shorter than that in biportal group ((49.7±10.6) minutes, P=0.02). There were no significant differences between two groups in terms of the mean hospital stay, compensatory sweating, and patient satisfaction. Two patients in the biportal group and three in the uniportal group experienced a unilateral pneumothorax. None of them required chest drainage. No patient experienced Homer's syndrome, and no recurrent symptoms were observed in either groupsConclusions Both uniportal and biportal video-assisted thoracoscopic sympathectomy are effective, safe, and minimally invasive for palmar hyperhidrosis. Comparing with the biportal approach, the uniportal approach causes lesspostoperative pain and less operative time, and is a more reasonable procedure in treatment of palmar hyperhidrosis.     

Uniportal versus biportal video-assisted thoracoscopic sympathectomy for palmar hyperhidrosis

Background Video-assisted thoracoscopic sympathectomy had replaced open surgery. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of using a single port and two pods to perform video-assisted thoracoscopic sympathectomy for palmar hyperhidrosis. Methods Between April 2006 and February 2008, 20 cases underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic sympathectomy through one port (uniportal group) and 25 cases through two pods (biportal group). The variables including the operating time, hospital stay, pain scores, postoperative complications, incidence of symptom recurrence and patient satisfaction were compared. The mean postoperative follow-up period was 11.5 months (range, 3-25 months). Results The hands of all patients were warm and dry after operation. No conversion to open surgery was necessary, and no operative mortality was recorded in either group. The mean inpatient pain scores were significantly higher in the biportal group (1.2±0.6) than that in the uniportal group (0.8±0.5, p=0.025). For the first three weeks after operation, four out of 20 (20%) patients in the uniportal group constantly suffered from mild or moderate residual pain while eight out of 25 (32%) cases in the biportal group (P=0.366). Among them, two cases in the uniportal group and five cases in the biportal group need to take analgesics. Our mean operative time (bilateral sympathectomy) in the uniportal group ((39.5±10.0) minutes) was shorter than that in biportal group ((49.7±10.6) minutes, P=0.02). There were no significant differences between two groups in terms of the mean hospital stay, compensatory sweating, and patient satisfaction. Two patients in the biportal group and three in the uniportal group experienced a unilateral pneumothorax. None of them required chest drainage. No patient experienced Homer's syndrome, and no recurrent symptoms were observed in either groupsConclusions Both uniportal and biportal video-assisted thoracoscopic sympathectomy are effective, safe, and minimally invasive for palmar hyperhidrosis. Comparing with the biportal approach, the uniportal approach causes lesspostoperative pain and less operative time, and is a more reasonable procedure in treatment of palmar hyperhidrosis.     

Uniportal versus biportal video-assisted thoracoscopic sympathectomy for palmar hyperhidrosis

Background Video-assisted thoracoscopic sympathectomy had replaced open surgery. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of using a single port and two pods to perform video-assisted thoracoscopic sympathectomy for palmar hyperhidrosis. Methods Between April 2006 and February 2008, 20 cases underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic sympathectomy through one port (uniportal group) and 25 cases through two pods (biportal group). The variables including the operating time, hospital stay, pain scores, postoperative complications, incidence of symptom recurrence and patient satisfaction were compared. The mean postoperative follow-up period was 11.5 months (range, 3-25 months). Results The hands of all patients were warm and dry after operation. No conversion to open surgery was necessary, and no operative mortality was recorded in either group. The mean inpatient pain scores were significantly higher in the biportal group (1.2±0.6) than that in the uniportal group (0.8±0.5, p=0.025). For the first three weeks after operation, four out of 20 (20%) patients in the uniportal group constantly suffered from mild or moderate residual pain while eight out of 25 (32%) cases in the biportal group (P=0.366). Among them, two cases in the uniportal group and five cases in the biportal group need to take analgesics. Our mean operative time (bilateral sympathectomy) in the uniportal group ((39.5±10.0) minutes) was shorter than that in biportal group ((49.7±10.6) minutes, P=0.02). There were no significant differences between two groups in terms of the mean hospital stay, compensatory sweating, and patient satisfaction. Two patients in the biportal group and three in the uniportal group experienced a unilateral pneumothorax. None of them required chest drainage. No patient experienced Homer's syndrome, and no recurrent symptoms were observed in either groupsConclusions Both uniportal and biportal video-assisted thoracoscopic sympathectomy are effective, safe, and minimally invasive for palmar hyperhidrosis. Comparing with the biportal approach, the uniportal approach causes lesspostoperative pain and less operative time, and is a more reasonable procedure in treatment of palmar hyperhidrosis.     

Uniportal versus biportal video-assisted thoracoscopic sympathectomy for palmar hyperhidrosis

Background Video-assisted thoracoscopic sympathectomy had replaced open surgery. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of using a single port and two pods to perform video-assisted thoracoscopic sympathectomy for palmar hyperhidrosis. Methods Between April 2006 and February 2008, 20 cases underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic sympathectomy through one port (uniportal group) and 25 cases through two pods (biportal group). The variables including the operating time, hospital stay, pain scores, postoperative complications, incidence of symptom recurrence and patient satisfaction were compared. The mean postoperative follow-up period was 11.5 months (range, 3-25 months). Results The hands of all patients were warm and dry after operation. No conversion to open surgery was necessary, and no operative mortality was recorded in either group. The mean inpatient pain scores were significantly higher in the biportal group (1.2±0.6) than that in the uniportal group (0.8±0.5, p=0.025). For the first three weeks after operation, four out of 20 (20%) patients in the uniportal group constantly suffered from mild or moderate residual pain while eight out of 25 (32%) cases in the biportal group (P=0.366). Among them, two cases in the uniportal group and five cases in the biportal group need to take analgesics. Our mean operative time (bilateral sympathectomy) in the uniportal group ((39.5±10.0) minutes) was shorter than that in biportal group ((49.7±10.6) minutes, P=0.02). There were no significant differences between two groups in terms of the mean hospital stay, compensatory sweating, and patient satisfaction. Two patients in the biportal group and three in the uniportal group experienced a unilateral pneumothorax. None of them required chest drainage. No patient experienced Homer's syndrome, and no recurrent symptoms were observed in either groupsConclusions Both uniportal and biportal video-assisted thoracoscopic sympathectomy are effective, safe, and minimally invasive for palmar hyperhidrosis. Comparing with the biportal approach, the uniportal approach causes lesspostoperative pain and less operative time, and is a more reasonable procedure in treatment of palmar hyperhidrosis.     

Uniportal versus biportal video-assisted thoracoscopic sympathectomy for palmar hyperhidrosis

Background Video-assisted thoracoscopic sympathectomy had replaced open surgery. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of using a single port and two pods to perform video-assisted thoracoscopic sympathectomy for palmar hyperhidrosis. Methods Between April 2006 and February 2008, 20 cases underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic sympathectomy through one port (uniportal group) and 25 cases through two pods (biportal group). The variables including the operating time, hospital stay, pain scores, postoperative complications, incidence of symptom recurrence and patient satisfaction were compared. The mean postoperative follow-up period was 11.5 months (range, 3-25 months). Results The hands of all patients were warm and dry after operation. No conversion to open surgery was necessary, and no operative mortality was recorded in either group. The mean inpatient pain scores were significantly higher in the biportal group (1.2±0.6) than that in the uniportal group (0.8±0.5, p=0.025). For the first three weeks after operation, four out of 20 (20%) patients in the uniportal group constantly suffered from mild or moderate residual pain while eight out of 25 (32%) cases in the biportal group (P=0.366). Among them, two cases in the uniportal group and five cases in the biportal group need to take analgesics. Our mean operative time (bilateral sympathectomy) in the uniportal group ((39.5±10.0) minutes) was shorter than that in biportal group ((49.7±10.6) minutes, P=0.02). There were no significant differences between two groups in terms of the mean hospital stay, compensatory sweating, and patient satisfaction. Two patients in the biportal group and three in the uniportal group experienced a unilateral pneumothorax. None of them required chest drainage. No patient experienced Homer's syndrome, and no recurrent symptoms were observed in either groupsConclusions Both uniportal and biportal video-assisted thoracoscopic sympathectomy are effective, safe, and minimally invasive for palmar hyperhidrosis. Comparing with the biportal approach, the uniportal approach causes lesspostoperative pain and less operative time, and is a more reasonable procedure in treatment of palmar hyperhidrosis.     

Uniportal versus biportal video-assisted thoracoscopic sympathectomy for palmar hyperhidrosis

Background Video-assisted thoracoscopic sympathectomy had replaced open surgery. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of using a single port and two pods to perform video-assisted thoracoscopic sympathectomy for palmar hyperhidrosis. Methods Between April 2006 and February 2008, 20 cases underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic sympathectomy through one port (uniportal group) and 25 cases through two pods (biportal group). The variables including the operating time, hospital stay, pain scores, postoperative complications, incidence of symptom recurrence and patient satisfaction were compared. The mean postoperative follow-up period was 11.5 months (range, 3-25 months). Results The hands of all patients were warm and dry after operation. No conversion to open surgery was necessary, and no operative mortality was recorded in either group. The mean inpatient pain scores were significantly higher in the biportal group (1.2±0.6) than that in the uniportal group (0.8±0.5, p=0.025). For the first three weeks after operation, four out of 20 (20%) patients in the uniportal group constantly suffered from mild or moderate residual pain while eight out of 25 (32%) cases in the biportal group (P=0.366). Among them, two cases in the uniportal group and five cases in the biportal group need to take analgesics. Our mean operative time (bilateral sympathectomy) in the uniportal group ((39.5±10.0) minutes) was shorter than that in biportal group ((49.7±10.6) minutes, P=0.02). There were no significant differences between two groups in terms of the mean hospital stay, compensatory sweating, and patient satisfaction. Two patients in the biportal group and three in the uniportal group experienced a unilateral pneumothorax. None of them required chest drainage. No patient experienced Homer's syndrome, and no recurrent symptoms were observed in either groupsConclusions Both uniportal and biportal video-assisted thoracoscopic sympathectomy are effective, safe, and minimally invasive for palmar hyperhidrosis. Comparing with the biportal approach, the uniportal approach causes lesspostoperative pain and less operative time, and is a more reasonable procedure in treatment of palmar hyperhidrosis.     

Uniportal versus biportal video-assisted thoracoscopic sympathectomy for palmar hyperhidrosis

Background Video-assisted thoracoscopic sympathectomy had replaced open surgery. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of using a single port and two pods to perform video-assisted thoracoscopic sympathectomy for palmar hyperhidrosis. Methods Between April 2006 and February 2008, 20 cases underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic sympathectomy through one port (uniportal group) and 25 cases through two pods (biportal group). The variables including the operating time, hospital stay, pain scores, postoperative complications, incidence of symptom recurrence and patient satisfaction were compared. The mean postoperative follow-up period was 11.5 months (range, 3-25 months). Results The hands of all patients were warm and dry after operation. No conversion to open surgery was necessary, and no operative mortality was recorded in either group. The mean inpatient pain scores were significantly higher in the biportal group (1.2±0.6) than that in the uniportal group (0.8±0.5, p=0.025). For the first three weeks after operation, four out of 20 (20%) patients in the uniportal group constantly suffered from mild or moderate residual pain while eight out of 25 (32%) cases in the biportal group (P=0.366). Among them, two cases in the uniportal group and five cases in the biportal group need to take analgesics. Our mean operative time (bilateral sympathectomy) in the uniportal group ((39.5±10.0) minutes) was shorter than that in biportal group ((49.7±10.6) minutes, P=0.02). There were no significant differences between two groups in terms of the mean hospital stay, compensatory sweating, and patient satisfaction. Two patients in the biportal group and three in the uniportal group experienced a unilateral pneumothorax. None of them required chest drainage. No patient experienced Homer's syndrome, and no recurrent symptoms were observed in either groupsConclusions Both uniportal and biportal video-assisted thoracoscopic sympathectomy are effective, safe, and minimally invasive for palmar hyperhidrosis. Comparing with the biportal approach, the uniportal approach causes lesspostoperative pain and less operative time, and is a more reasonable procedure in treatment of palmar hyperhidrosis.     

Uniportal versus biportal video-assisted thoracoscopic sympathectomy for palmar hyperhidrosis

Background Video-assisted thoracoscopic sympathectomy had replaced open surgery. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of using a single port and two pods to perform video-assisted thoracoscopic sympathectomy for palmar hyperhidrosis. Methods Between April 2006 and February 2008, 20 cases underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic sympathectomy through one port (uniportal group) and 25 cases through two pods (biportal group). The variables including the operating time, hospital stay, pain scores, postoperative complications, incidence of symptom recurrence and patient satisfaction were compared. The mean postoperative follow-up period was 11.5 months (range, 3-25 months). Results The hands of all patients were warm and dry after operation. No conversion to open surgery was necessary, and no operative mortality was recorded in either group. The mean inpatient pain scores were significantly higher in the biportal group (1.2±0.6) than that in the uniportal group (0.8±0.5, p=0.025). For the first three weeks after operation, four out of 20 (20%) patients in the uniportal group constantly suffered from mild or moderate residual pain while eight out of 25 (32%) cases in the biportal group (P=0.366). Among them, two cases in the uniportal group and five cases in the biportal group need to take analgesics. Our mean operative time (bilateral sympathectomy) in the uniportal group ((39.5±10.0) minutes) was shorter than that in biportal group ((49.7±10.6) minutes, P=0.02). There were no significant differences between two groups in terms of the mean hospital stay, compensatory sweating, and patient satisfaction. Two patients in the biportal group and three in the uniportal group experienced a unilateral pneumothorax. None of them required chest drainage. No patient experienced Homer's syndrome, and no recurrent symptoms were observed in either groupsConclusions Both uniportal and biportal video-assisted thoracoscopic sympathectomy are effective, safe, and minimally invasive for palmar hyperhidrosis. Comparing with the biportal approach, the uniportal approach causes lesspostoperative pain and less operative time, and is a more reasonable procedure in treatment of palmar hyperhidrosis.     

Uniportal versus biportal video-assisted thoracoscopic sympathectomy for palmar hyperhidrosis

Background Video-assisted thoracoscopic sympathectomy had replaced open surgery. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of using a single port and two pods to perform video-assisted thoracoscopic sympathectomy for palmar hyperhidrosis. Methods Between April 2006 and February 2008, 20 cases underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic sympathectomy through one port (uniportal group) and 25 cases through two pods (biportal group). The variables including the operating time, hospital stay, pain scores, postoperative complications, incidence of symptom recurrence and patient satisfaction were compared. The mean postoperative follow-up period was 11.5 months (range, 3-25 months). Results The hands of all patients were warm and dry after operation. No conversion to open surgery was necessary, and no operative mortality was recorded in either group. The mean inpatient pain scores were significantly higher in the biportal group (1.2±0.6) than that in the uniportal group (0.8±0.5, p=0.025). For the first three weeks after operation, four out of 20 (20%) patients in the uniportal group constantly suffered from mild or moderate residual pain while eight out of 25 (32%) cases in the biportal group (P=0.366). Among them, two cases in the uniportal group and five cases in the biportal group need to take analgesics. Our mean operative time (bilateral sympathectomy) in the uniportal group ((39.5±10.0) minutes) was shorter than that in biportal group ((49.7±10.6) minutes, P=0.02). There were no significant differences between two groups in terms of the mean hospital stay, compensatory sweating, and patient satisfaction. Two patients in the biportal group and three in the uniportal group experienced a unilateral pneumothorax. None of them required chest drainage. No patient experienced Homer's syndrome, and no recurrent symptoms were observed in either groupsConclusions Both uniportal and biportal video-assisted thoracoscopic sympathectomy are effective, safe, and minimally invasive for palmar hyperhidrosis. Comparing with the biportal approach, the uniportal approach causes lesspostoperative pain and less operative time, and is a more reasonable procedure in treatment of palmar hyperhidrosis.     

32例电视胸腔镜胸交感神经干切除术治疗手汗症报道

目的总结电视胸腔镜下胸交感神经切除术治疗手汗症的临床经验。方法分析2004年3月~2006年12月间,应用电视胸腔镜行选择性胸交感神经干切除术治疗32例手汗症患者的临床资料,并对该手术进行文献复习和讨论。结果32例患者手术全部成功。平均手术时间(双侧)42min(28~76min),平均住院时间4.8d。平均随访时间22.5个月(10~41个月),17例(53.1%)患者出现躯干、大腿和脚等处的代偿性多汗,但患者能够耐受,不需要进一步治疗。结论电视胸腔镜下选择性胸交感神经干切除术是治疗手汗症的一种疗效确切、创伤小和安全的治疗方法。     

胸腔镜下胸交感神经切断术治疗手汗症的研究

目的:探讨胸腔镜胸交感神经切断术治疗手汗症的安全性和有效性.方法:对16例手汗症患者采用双腔气管插管全麻,电视胸腔镜下依次切断双侧胸3交感神经节手术治疗.结果:全组病例手术均获成功.所有患者术毕手掌多汗的症状即消失,皮温升高,双侧手术时间平均21 min.术后平均住院时间为2.2 d,术后无气胸、代偿性多汗及Homer's综合症等并发症.随访1～12个月,平均5.9个月,手汗症状无一例复发.结论:胸腔镜下胸3交感神经节切除术治疗手汗症,疗效确切,创伤小,恢复快,并发症少.     

胸腔镜下胸交感神经链切断术治疗手汗症

目的探讨胸腔镜下胸交感神经链切断术治疗手汗症的疗效和安全性。方法45例手汗症患者全身麻醉后在胸腔镜下行双侧胸3～4交感神经链切断术,术中持续监测心电图、平均动脉压、脉搏血氧饱和度、呼气末二氧化碳浓度及双手温度。手术前、后24 h行动态心电图检查。随访症状缓解情况、代偿性出汗和满意程度,评估手术前、后焦虑水平及其对日常生活的影响程度。结果平均手术时间为(35.6±5.7)min,术中血流动力学稳定。术后手掌多汗症状均消失,双手掌皮肤温度均较术前显著升高(P值均<0.01)。并发气胸及皮下气肿2例,无严重并发症。手术前、后24 h平均心率及矫正的QT间期比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。41例患者术后随访6～36个月,无复发。代偿性出汗18例(43.9%),其中轻度出汗16例(39.0%),中度出汗2例(4.9%)。手术后焦虑症状及对日常生活的影响较手术前均明显改善(P值均<0.01)。31例(75.6%)患者对手术非常满意,10例(24.4%)比较满意。结论胸腔镜下胸交感神经链切断术能显著减少双手出汗,提高生活质量,患者对手术满意度高,但应对患者强调常见并发症特别是代偿性出汗的可能。     

Thoracoscopic sympathectomy for primary palmar and axillary hyperhidrosis

Hyperhidrosisisadisablingdisorderthatcausesphysi calandpsychologicalinconvenience .Itisnotatemporarycondition .Manypeoplewhosufferfromithavesufferedformanyyears,usuallysincechildhood .Also,whetherinhotorcoldclimate ,thesweatingisconstant.Thisdisorderaf fectsasmallbutsignificantproportionoftheyoungpopula tionallovertheworld .Therearemanytypesoftreatmentsavailableforthisdisease .Conservativetreatmentisnotef fectiveinseverecases.Thoracoscopicsympathectomyisthetreatmentofchoice.Thispaperdescribe…     

加速康复外科在胸腔镜交感神经切断术治疗手汗症中的应用

目的 探讨加速康复外科（ERAS）在胸腔镜胸交感神经切断术治疗手汗症的临床应用价值。方法 回顾性研究我科2010 年1 月～2017 年6 月行胸腔镜胸交感神经切断术的78 例手汗症患者的临床资料,根据是否采用ERAS 理念,分为ERAS 组38 例,对照组40 例。比较两组的手术时间、视觉疼痛评分、血清CRP 上升水平、住院时间、住院费用、疗效满意率和并发症等资料。结果 两组均在胸腔镜下顺利完成手术,无中转开胸,症状缓解率100%。两组术后满意率、气胸及胸腔积液发生率比较,差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。ERAS 组手术时间、VAS 评分、血清CRP 上升水平、住院时间、住院费用、代偿性多汗等均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。所有患者均完成1 年随访,无复发病例。结论 加速康复外科在胸腔镜胸交感神经切断术中的应用是安全、有效的,有利于患者的快速康复,缩短住院时间,降低医疗费用,具有一定优势。     

胸腔镜下胸交感神经切断术治疗手汗症的临床应用

目的:总结胸腔镜下胸交感神经链切断术治疗手汗症的临床经验.方法:回顾分析2004年12月～2006年9月应用胸腔镜下胸交感神经链切断术治疗手汗症135例的临床资料.结果:全组病例手术均获成功,术后双手立即干燥、红润.无Homer综合症、血气胸等并发症.平均住院2天.结论:胸腔镜下胸交感神经切断术治疗手汗症安全、有效.     

电视纵隔镜与胸腔镜胸交感神经链切断术治疗手汗症的比较

目的 :探讨电视纵隔镜胸交感神经链切断术治疗手汗症的可行性。方法 :气管插管全麻 ,30°～ 4 5°半坐位 ,两臂外展 90°,电视纵隔镜从腋前线第 3肋间小切口置入 ,电钩切断T2～T4交感神经链。结果 :手术时间 2 0～ 4 0min ,平均 30min。单纯手汗合并而部及腋窝多汗均消失 ,双手温度上升0 .8～ 3.0℃ ,温暖而干燥。住院 3～ 30d ,平均 3.5 4d。无严重并发症发生 ,1例气胸需较长时间胸腔引流 ,背部代偿性多汗 34例。结论 :电视纵隔镜胸交感神经链切断术治疗手汗症可行。比常规电视胸腔镜减少 1～ 2个切口 ,操作简单 ,病人易于接受 ,可部分取代电视胸腔镜手术。     

电视胸腔镜手术治疗手汗症不同术式的选择

目的 回顾分析胸腔镜下不同术式治疗手汗症的远期疗效及术后代偿性多汗情况,供选择术式做参考.方法 对浙江省人民医院心胸外科自1995年7月至2008年8月接受电视胸腔镜双侧胸交感神经链部分切除术治疗手汗症的643例患者进行随访并分析,其中随访到498例(77.4%),按手术方式不同分为4组:A组:T2-4交感神经链切除82例;B组:T2交感神经链切断135例;C组:T2交感神经链夹闭41例;D组:T3-4交感神经链切除+旁路纤维(Kuntz纤维)切除240例.结果 4组患者均无手术死亡,手掌多汗症状治疗有效率达100%.4组代偿性多汗总体发生率分别为54.9%、48.1%、48.8%、28.8%,重度代偿性多汗发生率分别为9.8%、10.4%、9.8%、2.9%,D组与其他3组相比,无论是代偿性多汗总体发生率还是重度代偿性多汗发生率,差异均有统计学意义,D组明显低于其他3组,A、B、C 3组之间比较差异均无统计学意义.A、B、C、D 4组术后手汗症复发率分别为1.2%、2.2%、7.3%、0.8%,发现D组的手汗症术后复发率明显较C组低,差异有统计学意义(x2=8.423,P=0.004),其余互相之间的比较差异均无统计学意义.结论 胸腔镜下T3-4双侧交感神经链及旁路纤维切除术,是治疗手汗症、减少术后代偿性多汗并发症的良好选择.     

电视胸腔镜下胸交感神经链切断术的临床应用

随着胸交感神经链切断术中电视胸腔镜应用的不断深入,电视胸腔镜胸交感神经切除术(video-assisted thoraco-scopic sympathectomy,VATS)逐渐成为胸部交感神经切除术的首选方式。文中就交感神经链切断术发展史、适应证及术后并发症作一综述。     

单孔胸腔镜解剖性肺段切除治疗肺部小病变395例临床分析

目的 探讨单孔胸腔镜下解剖性肺段切除治疗肺部良恶性小病变的可行性及安全性。方法 回顾性分析2013年8月至2017年5月同济大学附属上海市肺科医院单一手术组采用单孔胸腔镜进行肺段切除的395例患者的临床资料。其中男性139例、女性256例;平均年龄为（56.25±10.53）岁;左肺193例,右肺202例。采用患者全身麻醉双腔气管插管,于腋前线第4或5肋间取4 cm单孔切口置入胸腔镜及手术器械行解剖性肺段切除术。统计分析左、右两侧肺段切除患者的围手术期资料、术后病理结果、术中中转情况、术后并发症及远期随访结果。结果 本组395例患者中除7例中转为肺叶切除、3例中转开胸、1例由后基底段中转为基底段切除外,其余均顺利完成目标肺段切除。左肺、右肺两侧手术患者在手术时间、术中失血量、病变直径、淋巴结采样个数、术后24 h胸腔引流量、术后插胸腔引流管时间、术后住院时间方面差异均无统计学意义（P均>0.05）。术后病理结果显示恶性病变310例,良性病变85例。术后发生并发症共11例（左肺6例、右肺5例）,其中血胸2例、延迟性漏气6例、心律失常3例。无手术死亡病例。随访9~54个月,平均随访时间为（40.06±2.86）个月,所有病例均无术后远期并发症,心肺功能均无异常,本组恶性病变患者均无复发或转移。结论 单孔胸腔镜下解剖性肺段切除安全、可行,可以达到精准、微创的病变部位切除,值得临床推广应用。