Antimicrobial resistance and molecular epidemiology of vancomycin-resistant enterococci from North America and Europe: a report from the SENTRY antimicrobial surveillance program

Increases in prevalence of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) have been documented globally since its emergence in the 1980s. A SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (2003) objective monitored VRE isolates with respect to antimicrobial susceptibility trends, geographic resistance variability, and clonal dissemination. In 2003, VRE isolates from North America (United States and Canada, n = 839, 26 sites) and Europe (n = 56, 10 sites) were susceptibility tested using Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) reference methodologies. Based on resistance profiles, 155 isolates displayed similar multidrug-resistant (MDR) profiles and were temporally related; these were subsequently submitted for typing by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). Most of the submitted isolates were Enterococcus faecium (91.0%) and Enterococcus faecalis (7.8%). Among VRE, the VanA phenotype was more prevalent in North America (76%) than Europe (40%), and all isolates had elevated resistance rates to other antimicrobial classes including the following: 1) chloramphenicol resistance among E. faecalis being greater in North America than in Europe (28.6% versus 7.1%, respectively) but reversed among E. faecium (0.5% and 15.0%, the latter due to clonal occurrences); 2) ciprofloxacin resistance in North America >99% for both species and in Europe varying from 85.7% to 87.5%; 3) rare occurrences of linezolid resistance in North America (0.8% to 1.8%) due to G2576U ribosomal mutation; 4) higher quinupristin/dalfopristin resistance observed among European E. faecium strains (10.0% versus 0.6%); and 5) higher rifampin resistance rates among European E. faecalis (21.4% versus 5.4%). Thirty-five MDR epidemic clusters were identified by PFGE in 21 North American and 2 European medical centers including the following: 1) VanA (20 sites, 27 clonal occurrences) and VanB (1 site, 2 clonal occurrences); 2) elevated quinupristin/dalfopristin MIC results (not vatD/E, 3 sites); and 3) chloramphenicol resistance (chloramphenicol acetyltransferase-positive strains, 3 sites). The esp gene, part of the putative E. faecium pathogenicity island and a marker for the clonal complex-17 lineage, was detected in 76% of vancomycin-resistant E. faecium. Clonal spread appears to be a dominant factor of MDR VRE dissemination on both continents, and further monitoring is critical to assist in the control of these resistant pathogens.     

Comparison of phenotypic methods to identify enterococci intrinsically resistant to vancomycin (VanC VRE)

Clinical laboratories must be able to differentiate between enterococci possessing acquired resistance to vancomycin (vanA and vanB genotypes) from those that are inherently resistant (vanC1 and vanC2/C3 genotypes). We compared several routine phenotypic tests to determine the species identity of clinical isolates of enterococci and a PCR assay for the van ligase genes was used to confirm identification of VanC VRE.The Vitek Gram Positive Identification card identified 53/60 (88%) Enterococcus faecalis and E. faecium isolates and 81/141 (57%) VanC VRE without additional testing. Another 32 of the VanC VRE required additional testing (e.g., motility and pigmentation) for correct identification. However, 7 of these 32 VanC VRE were nonmotile. The rapid ID 32 STREP strips identified 50/60 (83%) E. faecalis and E. faecium isolates and 102/141 (72%) VanC VRE. All E. faecalis and E. faecium isolates were nonmotile and did not acidify 1% methyl-alpha-D-glucopyranoside (MGP). Only 93/115 (81%) E. gallinarum and 21/26 (81%) E. casseliflavus/E. flavescens were motile but all 141 VanC VRE acidified MGP. MGP acidification can accurately differentiate VanC VRE from E. faecalis and E. faecium. Because some VanC VRE isolates are nonmotile, MGP acidification is preferred as a simple and less costly test for identification of these isolates.     

2007-2012年浙江萧山医院尿路感染患者的肠球菌分布及耐药性分析

目的 调查从尿路感染患者分离的肠球菌的菌种、临床分布及耐药性,为临床合理选用抗生素提供依据。方法 尿培养采用经典型浸片Uricult,ATB-Expression细菌分析系统进行鉴定和药敏试验;所有资料采用Whonet 5.6软件进行回顾性分析。结果 分离肠球菌238株,主要为粪肠球菌122株（51.3%）和屎肠球菌95株（39.9%）;菌株主要来源列前2位的是内科（38.2%）和泌尿外科（21.0%）;耐药率较高的是红霉素（86.5%）、利福平（75.7%）和四环素（66.4%）;较低的是呋喃妥因（19.7%）、万古霉素（9.6%）和利奈唑胺（0.0%）;粪肠球菌对利福平、红霉素、奎奴普丁/达福普汀和四环素的耐药率较高,均76.5%,万古霉素耐药率0.9%;屎肠球菌对氨苄西林等8种药物耐药率75.8%,万古霉素耐药率4.3%。粪肠球菌对所测试抗生素耐药率仅有四环素、奎奴普丁/达福普汀高于屎肠球菌,其余低于屎肠球菌;利福平、万古霉素和利奈唑胺耐药率在二者间差异无统计学意义。2007年与2012年相比,青霉素、氨苄西林等药物耐药率上升,而环丙沙星、四环素等下降。结论 肠球菌是引起尿路感染的重要病原菌,以粪肠球菌和屎肠球菌为主,不同种类肠球菌耐药率差别较大,加强细菌培养和定期分析其耐药性,有助于提高临床治愈率及合理用药水平。     

Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) colonization of high-risk patients in tertiary care Canadian hospitals. Canadian VRE Surveillance Group.

We isolated 1487 Enterococcus species from 1200 stool specimens collected from high-risk patients in 12 Canadian tertiary care hospitals between October 1995 and November 1996. The composition of the 1487 isolates was 601 vancomycin-sensitive Enterococcus faecalis (40.4%), 667 vancomycin-sensitive Enterococcus faecium (44.9%), 18 vancomycin-resistant (nine isolates MIC 8-16 micrograms/mL; nine isolates MIC > or = 32 micrograms/mL) E. faecium (VREF) (1.2%), 95 vancomycin-sensitive Enterococcus gallinarum (6.4%), 29 vancomycin-resistant (all MICs 8-16 micrograms/mL) E. gallinarum (2.0%), and 77 vancomycin-sensitive Enterococcus casseliflavus (5.2%). Nine of the 18 VREF isolates collected possessed the vanA genotype and were from three patients at one hospital. Two other VREF isolates, of the vanB genotype, were from a single patient at a second hospital, and the remaining seven isolates, also all of the vanB genotype, were from five patients at a third hospital. All VREF were ampicillin resistant (MIC > or = 16 micrograms/mL), streptomycin resistant (MIC > 1000 micrograms/mL), and ciprofloxacin resistant (MIC > or = 4 micrograms/mL). Ten of the 18 VREF were also resistant to gentamicin (MIC > 500 micrograms/mL), while all 18 isolates had quinupristin/dalfopristin MICs < or = 0.5 microgram/mL. In conclusion, high-risk patients in tertiary care Canadian hospitals are rarely colonized (9/1200 patients, 0.75%) with VREF in their lower gastrointestinal tract. These findings correlate well with the lack of reported VREF infection in high-risk patients in Canadian hospitals. Quinupristin/dalfopristin demonstrated excellent in vitro activity against VREF and other non-faecalis species of Enterococcus, many of which also possessed high-level ampicillin, and/or high-level aminoglycoside, and/or ciprofloxacin resistance.     

In vitro susceptibilities of enterococcal blood culture isolates from the Hamburg area to ten antibiotics

Treatment of enterococcal infections is often difficult because of intrinsic and acquired resistance to a variety of antimicrobial agents. Between January 1993 and May 1997, enterococci were isolated from blood cultures of 117 patients at the Institute of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, University Hospital Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. Eightynine (76%) isolates were phenotypically identified as Enterococcus faecalis, and 24 (21%) as Enterococcus faecium. All E. faecalis isolates, but only 17% of the E. faecium isolates were susceptible to ampicillin. Two E. faecium isolates (8%) but no E. faecalis were vancomycin resistant (vanA genotype). Quinupristin/dalfopristin shows a high degree of susceptiblity of E. faecium (79%) and may be suitable for the therapy of infections caused by glycopeptide-resistant E. faecium strains.     

Resistance to Linezolid: Characterization of Mutations in rRNA and Comparison of Their Occurrences in Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci

To assess the potential for emergence of resistance during the use of linezolid, we tested 10 clinical isolates of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) (four Enterococcus faecalis, five Enterococcus faecium, and one Enterococcus gallinarum) as well as a vancomycin-susceptible control (ATCC 29212) strain of E. faecalis. The enterococci were exposed to doubling dilutions of linezolid for 12 passes. After the final passage, the linezolid plate growing VRE contained a higher drug concentration with E. faecalis than with E. faecium. DNA sequencing of the 23S rRNA genes revealed that linezolid resistance in three E. faecalis isolates was associated with a guanine to uracil transversion at bp 2576, while the one E. faecium isolate for which the MIC was 16 microg/ml contained a guanine to adenine transition at bp 2505.     

Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of enterococci in intensive care units in Sweden evaluated by different MIC breakpoint systems.

Three hundred and twenty-two (322) clinical isolates were collected from patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) at eight Swedish hospitals between December 1996 and December 1998. Of the isolates, 244 (76%) were Enterococcus faecalis, 74 (23%) were Enterococcus faecium and four (1%) were other Enterococcus spp. MICs of ampicillin, imipenem, meropenem, piperacillin/tazobactam, ciprofloxacin, trovafloxacin, clinafloxacin, gentamicin, streptomycin, vancomycin, teicoplanin, quinupristin/dalfopristin, linezolid and evernimicin were determined by Etest. Susceptible and resistant isolates were defined according to the species-related MIC breakpoints of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (BSAC), the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) and the Swedish Reference Group for Antibiotics (SRGA). Tentative breakpoints were applied for new/experimental antibiotics. Multidrug resistance among enterococci in ICUs is not uncommon in Sweden, particularly among E. faecium, and includes ampicillin resistance and concomitant resistance to fluoroquinolones. Almost 20% of E. faecalis isolates showed high-level resistance to gentamicin and concomitant resistance to fluoroquinolones. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci were only found sporadically. Among the new antimicrobial agents, linezolid and evernimicin showed the best activity against all enterococcal isolates. There was good concordance between the BSAC, NCCLS and SRGA breakpoints in detecting resistance. When applying the SRGA breakpoints for susceptibility, isolates were more frequently interpreted as intermediate. This might indicate earlier detection of emerging resistance using the SRGA breakpoint when the native population is considered susceptible, but with the risk that isolates belonging to the native susceptible population will be incorrectly interpreted as intermediate.     

Substantially increased faecal carriage of vancomycin-resistant enterococci in a tertiary Greek hospital after a 4 year time interval

OBJECTIVES: In a tertiary Greek hospital with no documented vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) infections, a cross-sectional study was conducted in order to determine the degree of VRE faecal carriage among adult patients hospitalized in high-risk units. METHODS: Specimens for the surveillance were collected from separate patients in two periods (January-May 1999 and January-May 2003); 258 specimens were submitted during the first period and 149 during the second period. RESULTS: Three patients (1.2%) were colonized with VRE during the first period, whereas 52 (34.9%) were colonized during the second period. Two VRE isolates of the first period were Enterococcus faecalis and one Enterococcus faecium, whereas those of the second period were E. faecium except for three E. faecalis and two Enterococcus gallinarum. All VRE isolates apart from the two E. gallinarum isolates were positive for the vanA gene. The 48 vancomycin-resistant E. faecium were classified into eight clonal types, one of those predominating with 29 isolates; the remaining included one to nine isolates. The five vancomycin-resistant E. faecalis formed four distinct clonal types. CONCLUSIONS: The study reports a substantially higher prevalence of VRE carriage when the surveillance was repeated after a 4 year time interval. Urgent infection control measures are needed to prevent emergence of VRE outbreaks in our hospital setting.     

A clonal lineage of VanA-type Enterococcus faecalis predominates in vancomycin-resistant Enterococci isolated in New Zealand

Avoparcin was used as a feed additive in New Zealand broiler production from 1977 until June 2000. We report here on the effects of the usage and discontinuation of avoparcin on the prevalence of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) in broilers. Eighty-two VRE isolates were recovered from poultry fecal samples between 2000 and mid-2001. VRE isolates were only obtained from broiler farms that were using, or had previously used, avoparcin as a dietary supplement. Of these VRE isolates, 73 (89%) were VanA-type Enterococcus faecalis and nine (11%) were VanA-type Enterococcus faecium. All E. faecalis isolates were found to have an identical or closely related pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) pattern of SmaI-digested DNA and were susceptible to both ampicillin and gentamicin. The PFGE patterns of the nine E. faecium isolates were heterogeneous. All VRE contained both the vanA and ermB genes, which, regardless of species or PFGE pattern, resided on the same plasmid. Eighty-seven percent of the VRE isolates also harbored the tet(M) gene, while for 63 and 100%, respectively, of these isolates, the avilamycin and bacitracin MICs were high (>or=256 microg/ml). Five of eight vancomycin-resistant E. faecalis isolates recovered from humans in New Zealand revealed a PFGE pattern identical or closely related to that of the E. faecalis poultry VRE isolates. Molecular characterization of Tn1546-like elements from the VRE showed that identical transposons were present in isolates from poultry and humans. Based on the findings presented here, a clonal lineage of VanA-type E. faecalis dominates in VRE isolated from poultry and humans in New Zealand.     

Comparison of the clinical characteristics and outcomes associated with vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis and vancomycin-resistant E. faecium bacteremia

In published studies, cohorts of patients with bacteremia due to vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) have predominantly been infected with Enterococcus faecium. Little is known about the epidemiology and outcomes associated with bacteremia due to VR Enterococcus faecalis. A retrospective study of isolates obtained from January 2008 to October 2010 was conducted at Detroit Medical Center (DMC). Unique patients with blood cultures positive for VRE were reviewed. Outcomes were analyzed using logistic regression. During the study period, 105 cases of bacteremia due to VR E. faecalis and 197 cases of bacteremia due to VR E. faecium were identified. The mean age in the study cohort was 61.5 ± 15 years; 162 subjects (53.6%) were male. After controlling for a propensity score, bacteremia due to VR E. faecalis was associated with >2-fold-lower in-hospital mortality than bacteremia due to VR E. faecium. Interestingly, bacteremia due to VR E. faecalis was associated with longer hospital stay after VRE isolation, although total length of stay was similar for groups with VR E. faecalis and VR E. faecium. Bacteremia due to VR E. faecalis was associated with a >2-fold-lower risk for mortality than bacteremia due to VR E. faecium, possibly due to the availability of β-lactam therapeutics for treatment of VR E. faecalis.     

Antibiotic activity against urinary tract infection (UTI) isolates of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE): results from the 2002 North American Vancomycin Resistant Enterococci Susceptibility Study (NAVRESS)

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) in urinary isolates in North America, and the activity of various antibiotics against VRE. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-eight medical centres in the United States and 10 centres in Canada assessed the prevalence of VRE in urinary isolates in 2002. Each study site was asked to collect up to a maximum of 50 consecutive VRE (Enterococcus faecium, Enterococcus faecalis only) urinary isolates. Susceptibility was determined by NCCLS broth microdilution. The prevalence of vanA and vanB resistance genotypes was determined by multiplex PCR. RESULTS: From the 28 US medical centres, a total of 697 VRE (616 [88.4%] E. faecium and 81 [11.6%] E. faecalis) were received. Approximately 75% of all VRE (E. faecium and E. faecalis) isolates demonstrated a VanA phenotype (resistance to both vancomycin and teicoplanin). PCR detection of vanA and vanB resistance determinants showed that the vanA genotype was present in 584 of 697 (83.8%) VRE isolates, whereas 113 (16.2%) isolates possessed the vanB gene. The most active agents were linezolid, nitrofurantoin and chloramphenicol, with 0.3%, 0.6% and 2.4% resistance, respectively. The majority (77.8%) of vancomycin-resistant E. faecium isolates displayed the VanA phenotype, and 538 of these 616 (87.3%) isolates were PCR-positive for vanA; the vanB genotype was detected in 78 (12.7%) isolates. Resistance was lowest with linezolid, chloramphenicol and nitrofurantoin at 0.3%, 0.3% and 0.5%, respectively. Only three genetically indistinguishable vanA-positive E. faecium were isolated from the 10 Canadian medical centres. CONCLUSION: VRE urinary isolates are common in the United States, are primarily of the vanA genotype and are very susceptible to linezolid, nitrofurantoin and chloramphenicol. In Canada, VRE urinary isolates remain uncommon.     

Comparative activity of quinupristin/dalfopristin and RPR 106972 and the effect of medium on in-vitro test results

Quinupristin/dalfopristin and RPR 106972 were active in vitro against a wide range of aerobic Gram-positive organisms including Enterococcus faecium. However, most isolates of Enterococcus faecalis were resistant or of intermediate sensitivity. Against Staphylococcus aureus quinupristin/dalfopristin was more active but for all other species the range of activity of the two drugs was the same or RPR 106972 was more active. RPR 106972 was also more active against the respiratory pathogens Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis. Quinupristin/dalfopristin MICs for isolates of H. influenzae (1-8 mg/L) clustered around the breakpoint. There were differences in the quality of growth, but little difference in MICs or zone diameters was obtained on three different media: Mueller-Hinton (MHA), Iso-Sensitest (ISA), and Diagnostic Sensitivity Test (DST) agars. The addition of blood to the medium increased MICs 2- to 4-fold, with MHA showing the greatest increase, and reduced zone diameters around quinupristin/dalfopristin discs by 3-4 mm, with the greatest effect on ISA.     

In vitro activity of quinupristin/dalfopristin against clinical isolates of common gram-positive bacteria in Taiwan

The MICs of quinupristin/dalfopristin against common Gram-positive bacteria isolated from various clinical specimens at a university hospital in Taiwan were determined by the agar dilution method. The tested bacteria included methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis (MRSE), methicillin-susceptible S. epidermidis (MSSE), Streptococcus pyogenes, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Enterococcus faecalis. With the exception of E. faecalis all bacteria were susceptible to quinupristin/dalfopristin. The MIC50 and MIC90 were, respectively, 0.25 microgram/mL and 0.5 microgram/mL for both MRSA and MSSA; 0.25 microgram/mL and 0.5 microgram/mL for MRSE; 0.25 microgram/mL and 0.25 microgram/mL for MSSE; 0.125 microgram/mL and 0.125 microgram/mL for S. pyogenes; and < or = 0.03 microgram/mL and 0.25 microgram/mL for S. pneumoniae. Eighty-two percent of the tested E. faecalis isolates were intermediately resistant or resistant to quinupristin/dalfopristin, with an MIC50 of 2 micrograms/mL and an MIC90 of 4 micrograms/mL. Quinupristin/dalfopristin seems to be a promising antimicrobial agent against common Gram-positive bacteria other than E. faecalis in Taiwan.     

Prevalence of resistance to MLS antibiotics in 20 European university hospitals participating in the European SENTRY surveillance programme. Sentry Participants Group.

Macrolide, lincosamide and streptogramin (MLS) antibiotics are chemically distinct inhibitors of bacterial protein synthesis. Resistance to MLS antibiotics may be constitutive or inducible. The purpose of this study is to update our understanding of the prevalence of different forms of MLS resistance in Europe. The analysis of 3653 clinical pneumococcal, staphylococcal and enterococcal isolates exhibited an average percentage of 21.3% and 6.2% intermediate and high-level penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae, 21.8% methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and 11% vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium. Geographical differences in erythromycin and clindamycin resistance in isolates of S. pneumoniae and S. aureus strongly reflect geographical variations in susceptibility to penicillin and methicillin, respectively. A very narrow range of MICs was obtained with quinupristin/dalfopristin, with no S. pneumoniae, S. aureus and E. faecium isolate having an MIC of > 4 mg/L, indicating a possible role of quinupristin/dalfopristin in the treatment of infections by multi-resistant Gram-positive bacteria.     

Treatment of vancomycin-resistant enterococcus with quinupristin/dalfopristin and high-dose ampicillin

OBJECTIVE: To report the successful treatment of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) bacteremia using the combination of quinupristin/dalfopristin and high-dose ampicillin. CASE SUMMARY: A 38-year-old African American woman with relapsed acute myeloid leukemia and neutropenic fever developed VRE bacteremia following 3 successive courses of vancomycin for methicillin-resistant staphylococcal infections. Treatment with linezolid was initiated; however, after 9 days of therapy, blood cultures continued to reveal VRE and the patient became febrile. The patient was subsequently switched to quinupristin/dalfopristin and high-dose ampicillin. The fever resolved and all subsequent blood cultures were negative after the initiation of combination therapy. DISCUSSION: The emergence of VRE infections presents a treatment challenge in immunocompromised patients. When treating VRE infections in this patient population, the effectiveness of linezolid and quinupristin/dalfopristin is limited by their bacteriostatic activity when used as monotherapy. Recent in vitro data suggest synergistic activity with quinupristin/dalfopristin when used in combination with other antimicrobials in selected isolates of VRE. CONCLUSIONS: Persistent VRE bacteremia was successfully treated in this neutropenic patient using the combination of high-dose ampicillin and quinupristin/dalfopristin. Case reports and in vitro data suggest that concomitant therapy with high-dose ampicillin may be an effective treatment alternative for VRE infections not responding to standard therapy.     

258株肠球菌耐药性分析及耐万古霉素基因检测

目的研究肠球菌的耐药率及耐万古霉素肠球菌(VRE)的耐药表型和基因型。方法按照美国临床和实验室标准化研究所(CLSI)2009年推荐的微量稀释法进行临床分离肠球菌对各类药物的最小抑菌浓度(MIC)检测,VRE进一步用E-test药敏试验确认;PCR法检测VRE的耐药基因。结果 2010年7月至2011年11月沈阳军区总医院共检出粪肠球菌95株,屎肠球菌163株。粪肠球菌对万古霉素、替考拉宁保持较高敏感度,对氨苄西林、青霉素、呋喃妥因三种抗菌药物敏感度也在65%以上,对其他抗菌药物敏感度低,统计期内未检出耐万古霉素粪肠球菌菌株。屎肠球菌对多数抗菌药物表现为耐药,对氯霉素敏感率为70%,对万古霉素、替考拉宁敏感度下降,为90.7%。期间检出15株VRE,其耐药表型为多重耐药,PCR扩增结果显示,15株万古霉素耐药屎肠球菌VanA基因扩增均为阳性,产物长度在700～1000bp之间,约783bp,符合预期;VanB、VanC引物扩增均阴性。15株万古霉素耐药屎肠球菌对多数抗菌药物耐药,仅对氯霉素、四环素相对敏感,对万古霉素MIC>256mg/L,对替考拉宁也表现为耐药。结论屎肠球菌耐药性高于粪肠球菌,VRE多为多重耐药,给临床治疗带来困难,医院应加强对其预防监测。     

European survey of vancomycin-resistant enterococci in at-risk hospital wards and in vitro susceptibility testing of ramoplanin against these isolates

A survey in eight European countries, including 13 hospitals, of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) in at-risk hospital wards (such as the ICU and the haematology ward) was performed in 2001, and the in vitro susceptibility of the isolates ramoplanin and other drugs was tested. A total of 1314 non-duplicate clinical enterococcal isolates were collected, and 38 (2.9%) were vancomycin resistant: 27 Enterococcus faecium and 11 Enterococcus faecalis; 35 VanA and three VanB phenotypes. Rates of VRE among clinical enterococcal isolates varied between 0 and 1.7% for the participating countries, except the UK (10.4%) and Italy (19.6%). One hundred and twenty-three (3.5%) VRE were found among 3499 stool samples tested for the presence of these organisms: 111 (3.2%) E. faecium and 12 (0.3%) E. faecalis; 114 (3.3%) VanA and nine (0.3%) VanB phenotypes. Rates of intestinal colonization with VRE varied between 0 and 1.2% for the participating countries, except Italy (7.5%) and the UK (32.6%). In vitro susceptibility testing showed that the Italian and UK VRE are multi-resistant (including resistance to ampicillin and high-level resistance to gentamicin and streptomycin), and that ramoplanin was active against all strains of VRE, with an MIC90 of 0.5 mg/L for clinical isolates. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis showed that the high prevalence of VRE in the Italian and UK centres was related to the monoclonal emergence and spread of three centre-specific clones. This survey suggests that in some centres in Europe, a similar situation may be encountered to that in the USA (monoclonal spread of multi-resistant VRE in at-risk wards).     

氨苄西林预报粪肠球菌和屎肠球菌亚胺培南敏感性的可行性研究

目的 评价氨苄西林预报粪肠球菌和屎肠球菌亚胺培南敏感性的可行性。方法 收集23家医院的127株粪肠球菌和124株屎肠球菌非重复临床分离株。采用微量肉汤稀释法和纸片扩散法测定粪肠球菌和屎肠球菌对青霉素、氨苄西林、亚胺培南的敏感性。结果 纸片扩散法青霉素和氨苄西林均敏感或均耐药的粪肠球菌,微量肉汤稀释法氨苄西林-亚胺培南的分类一致率（CA）均为100.0%,未出现非常重大误差（VME）和重大误差（ME）;纸片扩散法青霉素和氨苄西林均耐药的粪肠球菌,微量肉汤稀释法氨苄西林-亚胺培南的CA为77.8%,ME占22.2%;青霉素耐药、氨苄西林敏感的粪肠球菌,微量肉汤稀释法氨苄西林-亚胺培南的CA为57.1%,纸片扩散法的CA为81.8%。结论 氨苄西林预报粪肠球菌和屎肠球菌亚胺培南敏感性的可靠性优于青霉素,但氨苄西林的敏感性不能用于预报青霉素耐药、氨苄西林敏感表型粪肠球菌和屎肠球菌的亚胺培南敏感性;青霉素敏感可预报粪肠球菌和屎肠球菌对氨苄西林敏感。     

Enterococci with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin in New Zealand

This study was conducted to determine the prevalence of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) in the stools of hospitalized patients with possible antibiotic-associated diarrhoea. From 176 faecal samples collected during 1997 and 1998, 66 strains of enterococci were recovered using vancomycin enrichment techniques. Only six of these displayed reduced susceptibility to vancomycin (MIC 8-12 mg/L). All VRE were positive for the presence of the vanC gene. Based on motility, pigment production and automated Gram-positive identification (GPI Vitek card), four of these six VRE isolates were identified as Enterococcus gallinarum. The remaining two isolates were non-motile and therefore were considered to be Enterococcus faecium. However, 16S rDNA sequence analysis and positive methyl-alpha-D-glucopyranoside tests indicated that they were non-motile species of E. gallinarum. This is consistent with the intrinsic, low-level vanC-1-mediated resistance associated with this species. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis comparisons between the VRE indicated genetic relatedness between some strains. This work confirms that vancomycin-resistant E. faecium and Enterococcus faecalis are rare in New Zealand.     

2010年中国CHINET肠球菌属细菌耐药性监测

目的了解2010年中国主要地区临床分离肠球菌属细菌对各类抗菌药物的耐药性。方法国内主要地区14所教学医院(12所综合性医院,2所儿童医院)按统一方案、采用统一的材料、方法(K-B法)和判断标准(CLSI 2010年版)进行肠球菌属细菌的耐药性监测。结果共分离到4 046株非重复肠球菌属细菌,最常见菌种为粪肠球菌1 829株(45.2%)、屎肠球菌1 817株(44.9%)、鹑鸡肠球菌78株(1.9%)、鸟肠球菌54株(1.3%)、铅黄肠球菌49株(1.2%)。肠球菌属对利奈唑胺、万古霉素、替考拉宁仍极敏感,耐药率<4%,万古霉素耐药粪肠球菌和屎肠球菌检出率分别为0.6%、3.6%。粪肠球菌对呋喃妥因、磷霉素和氨苄西林耐药率较低,分别为3.2%、5.7%和11.3%,对高浓度庆大霉素耐药率为44.0%;屎肠球菌耐药性明显高于粪肠球菌,对氨苄西林耐药率接近90%,对高浓度庆大霉素耐药率接近70%,对氯霉素耐药率仅为7.3%,儿童屎肠球菌分离株对磷霉素、呋喃妥因耐药率<10%。不同医院分离的肠球菌属细菌对抗菌药物的耐药率有一定差异。结论屎肠球菌的分离率有增加趋势,肠球菌属细菌对利奈唑胺、万古霉素、替考拉宁依然保持极高的敏感性。